REVIEW 2 cited by
Surpassing the Global Heisenberg Limit Using a High-effciency Quantum Switch
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Indefinite causal orders have been shown to enable a precision of inverse square N in quantum parameter estimation, where N is the number of independent processes probed in an experiment. This surpasses the widely accepted ultimate quantum precision of the Heisenberg limit, 1/N. While a recent laboratory demonstration highlighted this phenomenon, its validity relies on postselection for it only accounted for a subset of the resources used. Achieving a true violation of the Heisenberg limit-considering photon loss, detection ineffciency, and other imperfections-remains an open challenge. Here, we present an ultrahigh-effciency quantum switch to estimate the geometric phase associated with a pair of conjugate position and momentum displacements embedded in a superposition of causal orders. Our experimental data demonstrate precision surpassing the global Heisenberg limit without artificially correcting for losses or imperfections. This work paves the way for quantum metrology advantages under more general and realistic constraints.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Toward an Experimental Device-Independent Verification of Indefinite Causal Order
First experimental implementation of a device-independent inequality violation for indefinite causal order, with measured value 1.8328 ± 0.0045 against bound 1.75.
-
The Transformation-Response Framework: An Operational Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum states are redefined as positive-definite characteristic functions over a transformation group; the standard QM formalism is derived from this one assumption via GNS and Bochner theorems.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.