Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 36 references

Variable Frequency Pulse Generation from Breathers in Josephson Transmission Lines

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Breathers—bound fluxon-antifluxon pairs—driven by timed flux-pulse trains can generate flat-top Gaussian microwave pulses at 15-22 GHz with up to 97% simulated efficiency in an unbiased Josephson transmission line.

desk verdict Novel breather-based pulse shaping protocol with real potential, but the unshunted/overdamped contradiction and inconsistent reported numbers need to be resolved before the results can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03689 v1 pith:BAAAHCBZ submitted 2025-05-06 quant-ph

Gregory Cunningham , Yufeng Ye , Kaidong Peng , Alec Yen , Jessica Kedziora , Kevin P. O'Brien This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords Josephsontransmissionlinebreatherfluxonfluxoidsinglefluxquantummicrowavepulsegenerationcryogenicqubitcontrolsuperconductingreadout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes generating shaped gigahertz microwave pulses entirely inside a cryostat, using the physics of breathers in a Josephson transmission line (JTL). A breather is a bound fluxon–antifluxon pair that oscillates near the junction plasma frequency $\omega_P$ and slowly decays when the line's output termination has the right impedance mismatch. The protocol feeds trains of alternating-polarity flux pulses, timed to the breather period, so that the junction phase oscillates with an amplitude envelope set by the flux content of each pulse. Simulations show flat-top Gaussian pulses at 15.2–21.5 GHz with bandwidths from 40 to 365 MHz and maximum energy efficiency of 0.97, and Gaussian pulses with efficiency up to 0.987, all without shunt or bias resistors. The result, if confirmed by experiment, would allow microwave tones for controlling and reading out superconducting qubits to be produced at 4 K with lower latency and heat load than room-temperature synthesis.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the breather: a bound fluxon–antifluxon pair that forms when a fluxon reflects off the output termination of a Josephson transmission line whose impedance ratio $\alpha_{\mathrm{Out}}$ lies in the absorption regime $\alpha_0 \leq \alpha \leq \alpha_\infty$ (here roughly 0.15–0.35). The breather oscillates near the junction plasma frequency $\omega_P$ and decays into plasma radiation over time. The protocol works by timing incoming alternating-polarity fluxons and fluxoids (pulses with flux not equal to $\Phi_0$) to the breather period $T_B \sim \omega_P^{-1}$, so each pulse tilts the Josephson washboard potential near the phase extrema; the junction phase then oscillates with an amplitude envelope set by each pulse's flux content, and adding more pulse pairs narrows the output bandwidth from 365 MHz to 40 MHz.

What would settle it

Build or simulate the 4–5 unit cell JTL with the stated inductance, capacitance, critical current, and output impedance ratio $\alpha_{\mathrm{Out}} = 0.25$, drive it with the pulse train produced by a standard DC-SFQ converter emitting fixed-$\Phi_0$ pulses with realistic timing jitter, and measure the output spectrum and energy efficiency. If the output no longer resembles a Gaussian or flat-top Gaussian, or the efficiency falls well below 0.97, the protocol depends on input pulses the cited source cannot supply; this is a check any group with a JTL simulation tool can run.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the decaying oscillation of breathers—formed when fluxon pulses reflect off the impedance-mismatched termination of an unbiased, unshunted Josephson transmission line—can be sculpted by incoming pulse trains into usable microwave pulses. Sending alternating-polarity fluxons (area $\Phi_0$) or fluxoids (area $\neq \Phi_0$) with spacing near the breather period $T_B \approx \omega_P^{-1}$ engineers the junction phase to oscillate with an amplitude envelope set by each pulse's flux content: a Gaussian amplitude envelope yields a Gaussian microwave pulse, while uniform pulses with shaped ends yield a flat-top Gaussian. Increasing the number of pulse pairs from 50 to 500 narrows the simulated bandwidth from 365 MHz to 40 MHz, comparable to pulses used for transmon qubit control and readout. The simulations report center frequencies of 15.2–21.5 GHz for flat-top Gaussian pulses and 14.6–21.1 GHz for Gaussian pulses, with maximum energy efficiencies of 0.970 and 0.987, at average input powers of a few to roughly 100 nW, well within a dilution refrigerator's cooling budget. A reverse device, converting microwave pulses back into fluxoids, is proposed as the path to a complete fluxoid-to-microwave-to-fluxoid interface at 4 K.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the required input pulses can actually be produced: an alternating-polarity train of fluxons and fluxoids whose amplitudes follow a Gaussian (or flat-top) envelope, spaced at the breather period, yet the paper only cites a DC-SFQ converter that emits fixed-area SFQ pulses and does not show how to generate variable-amplitude fluxoids or the exact timing pattern used in the simulations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Microwave readout and control tones can be generated at 4 K inside the dilution refrigerator, removing the latency, cabling, and heat load of room-temperature synthesis.
  • Because the junctions are unshunted and unbiased, the generator dissipates no static bias power, and simulated energy efficiency saturates near 0.97–0.98 as the number of pulse pairs grows.
  • Bandwidth narrows from 365 MHz (50 pulse pairs) to 40 MHz (500 pulse pairs), reaching the range used for transmon qubit control and dispersive readout.
  • Average input powers of roughly 1.9–97 nW sit above few-photon readout requirements (about $10^{-18}$ W) and far below the roughly 19 $\mu$W cooling power of the mK stage, so the device fits the cryogenic power budget.
  • Operated in reverse, the same device could convert microwave pulses into fluxoids, letting a forward/reverse pair form a complete cryogenic interface between SFQ logic at 4 K and qubits at mK.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Gaussian-envelope input requirement may be relaxable: the flat-top case already uses uniform-amplitude pulses with only the end pulses shaped, and because the output frequency is set by $\omega_P$ rather than by the input spectrum, a standard fixed-area SFQ source might approximate the required trains more closely than the variable-amplitude fluxoid picture suggests.
  • Time-reversal symmetry suggests a testable reciprocity check: the same JTL parameters that give 0.97 forward efficiency should, run backwards, convert a Gaussian tone into a fluxoid train, and comparing the two efficiencies would isolate the radiation loss the paper attributes to breather formation.
  • Timing jitter in the SFQ input train is an untested risk: if jitter is a significant fraction of the roughly 100 ps pulse spacing, the bandwidth narrowing from many pulse pairs will degrade, and a jitter-sweep simulation would place an upper bound on the usable number of pulse pairs.
  • The efficiency ceiling near 0.97 is blamed on plasma radiation emitted during breather formation; adjusting $\alpha_{\mathrm{In}}$ or the JTL length to recapture that radiation is a natural extension the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a protocol for generating gigahertz-frequency microwave pulses (flat-top Gaussian and Gaussian shapes) from trains of fluxons and fluxoids in an unbiased Josephson transmission line (JTL) with unshunted junctions, using breather formation and decay at an impedance-mismatched termination. WRspice simulations are used to demonstrate pulse generation with center frequencies around 15–24 GHz, energy efficiencies up to ~0.97–0.98, and bandwidths down to 40 MHz, along with reported input/output powers and a discussion of applications to superconducting qubit readout.

Significance. If correct, the protocol offers a cryogenic, on-chip microwave pulse source that avoids room-temperature synthesis and shunt resistors, which is relevant for scalable superconducting qubit control. The work builds on established sine-Gordon and breather theory, and the parameter sweeps in Figs. 3–5 provide falsifiable predictions. The central physics is plausible, but the significance is currently tempered by internal inconsistencies in the damping model, the lack of reproducible simulation details, and discrepancies in the reported performance metrics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (1b); Section IV] The text states 'In our overdamped system (β_C << 1), the relaxation between the nonlinear inductor and normal state resistance (τ_LR = L_J/R) sets the timescale for this phase slip process' (Section II) and later sets 'pulses have fixed pulse widths equal to the largest relaxation timescale in an overdamped junction (τ_LR)' (Section IV). This contradicts the paper's claim that the JTL uses unshunted junctions with no bias resistors (Abstract, Section I, Section VI). Equation (1b), the governing JTL equation, contains no resistive damping term, and standard unshunted Nb junctions have β_C >> 1, not β_C << 1. For the reported I_C = 4 µA and C_J = 800 fF, matching the 30.71 ps pulse width would require R ≈ 2.7 Ω, a very low shunt resistance. This inconsistency affects every reported frequency and efficiency value in Figs. 3–5 and Table I. The authors must clarify the WRspice netlist: does it include a shunt resistance, what is its value and the resulting β_C, and how does this align with the 'unshunted' claim? If the model is truly unshunted, the underdamped case requires re-analysis; if it is shunted, the central claim of eliminating shunt resistors is false.
  2. [Section VI and Fig. 4] The protocol requires input trains of fluxons and fluxoids whose amplitudes follow a Gaussian envelope, with alternating polarity and inter-pulse spacing near the breather period (Fig. 4a,c). Section VI states 'The SFQ pulses in this work would be generated via a DC-SFQ converter as described in [9]'. A standard DC-SFQ converter emits fixed-area SFQ pulses of a single polarity, not variable-amplitude bidirectional fluxoids. The paper does not demonstrate how to produce the specific amplitude-varying pulse sequences used in the simulations, nor does it discuss timing jitter, amplitude control, or the energy cost of generating the input train. This is load-bearing for the claimed practicality of the protocol.
  3. [Table I and Fig. 4d; Abstract/Conclusion] The reported performance numbers are internally inconsistent. The abstract and conclusion give flat-top Gaussian center frequencies of 15.2–21.5 GHz and Gaussian of 14.6–21.1 GHz, whereas Table I lists 16.991–24.018 GHz and 15.191–21.482 GHz, respectively. The abstract states bandwidth from 40 to 365 MHz, and Fig. 4d reports 365 MHz for 50 pulse pairs, but Table I's flat-top rows (50 pulses) show FWHM between 418 and 582 MHz. Additionally, the conclusion states output powers from -74.5 to -69.3 dBm, while Table I's load power column ranges from -77.2 to -62.4 dBm. These discrepancies must be reconciled so that the central claims are unambiguous.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II] There is a typo: 'Other defining parameters are the the junction plasma frequency' should read 'the junction plasma frequency'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] In the caption, 'THe collision' should be 'The collision'.
  3. [Section IV and Section VI] Section IV states that the JTL length is set by minimizing |1/i tan(N_JTL/λ_J)|, with the first minimum at N_JTL/λ_J ~ 1.66, but Section VI says the lengths are '4 (λ_J = 2.50) and 5 (λ_J = 3.17) unit cells', giving ratios 1.60 and 1.58. Please clarify which criterion sets the lengths and why the values differ slightly.
  4. [Table I] The column heading 'FWHM Power [Load]' is unclear; please define whether this is the integrated power within the full width at half maximum or some other metric.
  5. [Reproducibility] No netlist or simulation code is provided, which limits reproducibility; please include the WRspice netlist or a detailed model description as supplementary material.
  6. [References] Reference [9] is cited for DC-SFQ converters, but that reference describes RSFQ logic generally; please cite a specific DC-SFQ converter design and any works that address generation of variable-amplitude fluxoids of both polarities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the simulation results are computed from external sine-Gordon/breather theory and chosen circuit parameters, not from fitted targets or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. Breather formation and decay dynamics are cited from established external literature (McLaughlin & Scott, Costabile et al., Olsen & Samuelsen), and the WRspice simulations implement the discrete sine-Gordon equation (Eq. 1b) with circuit parameters listed explicitly. The reported center frequencies, bandwidths, and energy efficiencies in Table I and Fig. 5 are simulation outputs from chosen I_C, C_J, L, and termination impedances, not quantities fitted to a target result. The Gaussian and flat-top Gaussian output envelopes are produced by explicitly designing the input fluxoid/fluxon-pair amplitude and timing patterns, as stated in Section IV; this is an input-design protocol rather than a hidden fit, and the microwave-frequency carrier near ω_P is a nontrivial dynamical output of the JTL. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the cited references are external to the authors, and no uniqueness or existence theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked. The paper's internal inconsistency between the 'unshunted JTL' claim and the 'overdamped system (β_C << 1)' assumption in Section II is a physical-modeling concern, not a circularity, because the circularity criteria require showing that a claimed result reduces by construction to its inputs or to an unverified self-citation chain. No such reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The simulation depends on the standard discrete sine-Gordon model, established breather theory, and a set of hand-chosen operating parameters such as impedance ratios, fluxon velocity, pulse spacing, and JTL length. The largest unsupported load is the assumption that a DC-SFQ converter can produce the variable-amplitude fluxoid pulse trains used in the simulations. No code or netlist is provided, and the text contains an internal contradiction about junction damping. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Output impedance ratio α_Out = 0.15 to 0.35, with 0.25 used in Figs. 4 and 5
    Chosen by hand to place operation inside the breather absorption regime while controlling the resonance behavior.
  • Input impedance ratio α_In = 5.0
    Chosen in Section III to minimize fluxon reflection at the input port during forward propagation.
  • Incident fluxon velocity v0 = 0.75
    Fixed in Section III to give efficient phase-slip propagation between unit cells and to set the kinetic energy available for breather formation.
  • Pulse spacing and number of pulse pairs = Spacing near ω_P^{-1}; 41 or 50 pulse pairs, up to 500 for bandwidth scan
    Chosen so each incoming pulse reinforces the breather oscillation; more pairs narrow the output bandwidth as shown in Fig. 4d.
  • JTL length in unit cells = 4 unit cells for Gaussian, 5 unit cells for flat-top Gaussian
    Chosen so that N_JTL/λ_J is near 1.66, which the paper states minimizes the input impedance seen by a traveling wave at the plasma frequency.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The discrete sine-Gordon equation (Eq. 1b) accurately models the JTL with the chosen circuit parameters.
    This is the standard model for JTLs and the paper relies on it for all simulations without deriving it from the individual circuit elements.
  • standard math The breather formation thresholds and dynamics from McLaughlin-Scott and Costabile et al. (refs. 13-15) apply in the simulated parameter range.
    The paper uses α_0, α_∞, and the absorption regime from these references to choose α_Out and to interpret the simulated resonances.
  • domain assumption Voltage pulses with flux not equal to Φ0, called fluxoids, still obey valid phase winding quantization and can be injected as inputs.
    The protocol needs variable-amplitude fluxoids; the paper cites ref. 30 for their existence but does not demonstrate generation or injection in hardware.
  • ad hoc to paper A DC-SFQ converter can generate the required fluxoid pulse trains at 4 K.
    Section VI asserts feasibility based on ref. 9, but ref. 9 describes fixed-Φ0 SFQ pulses; variable-amplitude and alternating-polarity fluxoids are not established.
  • ad hoc to paper The junction damping in the WRspice model is physically consistent with unshunted junctions, despite the text calling the system overdamped (β_C << 1).
    No netlist is provided, so the damping source, intrinsic quasiparticle resistance versus external shunt, cannot be checked; the text's own β_C statement conflicts with the unshunted-junction claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Variable Frequency Pulse Generation from Breathers in Josephson Transmission Lines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAAAHCBZ

@misc{pith2026250503689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Variable Frequency Pulse Generation from Breathers in Josephson Transmission Lines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAAAHCBZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03689}
}
read the original abstract

Single flux quantum technology has the potential to enhance readout and control of superconducting quantum systems due to their low energy consumption, high speed, and cryogenic operating temperatures. Current cryogenic readout and control typically requires microwave pulses of specific frequencies to travel between the room temperature control electronics and the cryogenic setup. Latency in control and readout can be improved by generating pulses within the dilution refrigerator. In this work, we consider a protocol for generating gigahertz frequency microwave tones from trains of DC-centered fluxons and fluxoids in Josephson transmission lines using the dynamics of breather formation, without room temperature synthesis or shunt / bias resistors. Simulations show that pulses with frequencies in the range of 15.2 to 21.5 GHz can be generated with maximal energy efficiency of 97% and bandwidth from 40 to 365 MHz. This protocol can also be used to generate gigahertz frequency Gaussian pulses. We detail metrics relevant to the control and readout of quantum systems such as input power, output power, and footprint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Circuit description of system and simulated breather decay. (a) N unit cell JTL schematic for the nonlinear system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Toy model for breather formation and decay from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Breather variation with output impedance mismatch ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Gaussian and flat-top Gaussian pulse generation. (a) Gaussian load (orange) transient resulting from input (blue) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Flat-top Gaussian and Gaussian pulse generation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    K.Likharev and V.K. Semenov, Rsfq logic/memory fam- ily: a new josephson-junction technology for sub- terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems, IEEE Trans- actions on Applied Superconductivity1, 3 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [1]

    Gambetta, Ibm’s roadmap for scaling quantum tech- nology, IBM Research Blog (September 2020) (2020)

    J. Gambetta, Ibm’s roadmap for scaling quantum tech- nology, IBM Research Blog (September 2020) (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineer- ing cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technology6, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    A. M. Savin, J. P. Pekola, T. Holmqvist, J. Has- sel, L. Gr¨ onberg, P. Helist¨ o, and A. Kidiyarova- Shevchenko, High-resolution superconducting single-flux quantum comparator for sub-Kelvin temperatures, Ap- plied Physics Letters89, 133505 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [4]

    Intiso, J

    S. Intiso, J. Pekola, A. Savin, Y. Devyatov, and A. Kidiyarova-Shevchenko, Rapid single-flux-quantum circuits for low noise mK operation, Superconductor Sci- ence and Technology19, S335 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [5]

    S. K. Tolpygo, V. Bolkhovsky, T. J. Weir, L. M. John- son, M. A. Gouker, and W. D. Oliver, Fabrication pro- cess and properties of fully-planarized deep-submicron nb/al– AlO x/Nb josephson junctions for vlsi circuits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity25, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    Reversible Fluxon Logic: Topological particles allow ballistic gates along 1D paths

    W. Wustmann and K. D. Osborn, Reversible Fluxon Logic: Topological particles allow ballistic gates along 1D paths, Physical Review B101, 014516 (2020), arXiv: 1711.04339

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    C. Yan, J. Hassel, V. Vesterinen, J. Zhang, J. Ikonen, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Goetz, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, A low-noise on-chip coherent microwave source, Nature Electronics 4, 885 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    D. E. Kirichenko, S. Sarwana, and A. F. Kirichenko, Zero Static Power Dissipation Biasing of RSFQ Circuits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity21, 776 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    K. G. Fedorov, A. V. Shcherbakova, M. J. Wolf, D. Beck- mann, and A. V. Ustinov, Fluxon Readout of a Super- conducting Qubit, Physical Review Letters112, 160502 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Leonard, M

    E. Leonard, M. A. Beck, J. Nelson, B. Christensen, T. Thorbeck, C. Howington, A. Opremcak, I. Pech- enezhskiy, K. Dodge, N. Dupuis, M. Hutchings, J. Ku, F. Schlenker, J. Suttle, C. Wilen, S. Zhu, M. Vavilov, B. Plourde, and R. McDermott, Digital coherent control of a supercond...

    2019

  4. [12]

    McDermott, M

    R. McDermott, M. G. Vavilov, B. L. T. Plourde, F. K. Wilhelm, P. J. Liebermann, O. A. Mukhanov, and T. A. Ohki, Quantum–classical interface based on single flux quantum digital logic, Quantum Science and Technology 3, 024004 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    D. W. McLaughlin and A. C. Scott, Perturbation analysis of fluxon dynamics, Physical Review A18, 1652 (1978)

    1978

  6. [14]

    O. H. Olsen and M. R. Samuelsen, Reflection of sine- Gordon breathers, Journal of Applied Physics52, 2913 (1981)

    1981

  7. [15]

    Costabile, R

    G. Costabile, R. D. Parmentier, B. Savo, D. W. McLaughlin, and A. C. Scott, Exact solutions of the sine- Gordon equation describing oscillations in a long (but finite) Josephson junction, Applied Physics Letters32, 587 (1978)

    1978

  8. [16]

    Christiansen and O

    P. Christiansen and O. Olsen, Reflection of fluxons on a Josephson line cavity, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 1, 412 (1980)

    1980

  9. [17]

    Scott, F

    A. Scott, F. Chu, and D. McLaughlin, The soliton: A new concept in applied science, Proceedings of the IEEE 61, 1443 (1973)

    1973

  10. [18]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self- modulation of waves in nonlinear media, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.61, 118 (1971), [Sov. Phys. JETP34, 62 (1972)]

    1971

  11. [19]

    Likharev,Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Cir- cuits(Routledge, London, 1986)

    K. Likharev,Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Cir- cuits(Routledge, London, 1986)

    1986

  12. [20]

    Remoissenet,Waves Called Solitons Concepts and Ex- periments.(Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1996) oCLC: 1255224501

    M. Remoissenet,Waves Called Solitons Concepts and Ex- periments.(Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1996) oCLC: 1255224501

    1996

  13. [21]

    D. E. McCumber, Effect of ac Impedance on dc Voltage- Current Characteristics of Superconductor Weak-Link Junctions, Journal of Applied Physics39, 3113 (1968)

    1968

  14. [22]

    W. C. Stewart, CURRENT-VOLTAGE CHARAC- TERISTICS OF JOSEPHSON JUNCTIONS, Applied Physics Letters12, 277 (1968)

    1968

  15. [23]

    Y. S. Kivshar and B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of solitons in nearly integrable systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 61, 763 (1989)

    1989

  16. [24]

    Peyrard and M

    M. Peyrard and M. D. Kruskal, Kink dynamics in the highly discrete sine-Gordon system, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena14, 88 (1984)

    1984

  17. [25]

    V. V. Kurin and A. V. Yulin, Radiation of linear waves by solitons in a Josephson transmission line with dispersion, Physical Review B55, 11659 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    Osborn and W

    K. Osborn and W. Wustmann, Asynchronous reversible computing unveiled using ballistic shift registers, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 054034 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Darula and M

    M. Darula and M. Kedro, Dynamic reduction of the criti- cal current in a Josephson junction, Journal of Low Tem- perature Physics78, 287 (1990)

    1990

  20. [28]

    J. F. Currie, S. E. Trullinger, A. R. Bishop, and J. A. Krumhansl, Numerical simulation of sine-Gordon soliton dynamics in the presence of perturbations, Physical Re- view B15, 5567 (1977)

    1977

  21. [29]

    Polonsky, V

    S. Polonsky, V. Semenov, and D. Schneider, Transmission of single-flux-quantum pulses along superconducting mi- crostrip lines, IEEE Transactions on Applied Supercon- ductivity3, 2598 (1993)

    1993

  22. [30]

    Wildermuth, L

    M. Wildermuth, L. Powalla, J. N. Voss, Y. Sch¨ on, A. Schneider, M. V. Fistul, H. Rotzinger, and A. V. Ustinov, Fluxons in high-impedance long Josephson junc- tions, Applied Physics Letters120, 112601 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A Quantum Engineer’s Guide to Superconducting Qubits, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021318 (2019), arXiv: 1904.06560

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Grnbech-Jensen, P

    N. Grnbech-Jensen, P. S. Lomdahl, and M. R. Samuelsen, Bifurcation and chaos in a dc-driven long annular joseph- son junction, Phys. Rev. B43, 12799 (1991)

    1991

  26. [34]

    L. Howe, M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, A. J. Sirois, D. Olaya, J. Biesecker, P. D. Dresselhaus, S. P. Benz, 9 and P. F. Hopkins, Digital control of a superconduct- ing qubit using a josephson pulse generator at 3 k, PRX Quantum3, 010350 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Gambetta, A

    J. Gambetta, A. Blais, D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting, Phys. Rev. A74, 042318 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Naaman, J

    O. Naaman, J. Strong, D. Ferguson, J. Egan, N. Bai- ley, and R. Hinkey, Josephson junction microwave mod- ulators, in2018 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS(2018) pp. 1003–1005

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.