pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.07913 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-12 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Continental-scale assessment of spatial food market accessibility in Africa using open geospatial data

Robert Benassai-Dalmau , Vasiliki Voukelatou , Rossano Schifanella , Stefania Fiandrino , Daniela Paolotti , Kyriaki Kalimeri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords food market accessibilityAfricaOpenStreetMaptravel timefood securityspatial analysissocioeconomic disparitiesWorld Food Programme
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rural and economically disadvantaged populations across Africa face substantially longer travel times to food markets, limited availability, and less spatial redundancy than urban or wealthier groups.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps food market accessibility continent-wide by combining open road and market data to compute three metrics at once. It shows that rural and low-wealth areas require hours of travel in some cases and have fewer backup options, patterns that line up with an independent wealth index and track moderately with measured food insecurity. A sympathetic reader would care because these gaps point to a concrete lever—market proximity—that shapes daily food security for millions and could guide where roads or new markets would help most.

Core claim

Integrating OpenStreetMap road networks with World Food Programme market locations, the study computes travel time to the nearest market, availability inside a 30-minute window, and an entropy-based measure of spatial distribution; the resulting maps reveal pronounced disparities in which rural and economically disadvantaged populations experience higher travel times, reduced market reach, and lower spatial redundancy, patterns that align with the Relative Wealth Index and correlate moderately with Integrated Food Security Phase Classification levels.

What carries the argument

Three complementary accessibility metrics—travel time to nearest market, 30-minute availability threshold, and entropy-based spatial redundancy—derived from OpenStreetMap roads and World Food Programme market points.

If this is right

  • Accessibility patterns track broader socioeconomic stratification and therefore reflect existing geographic inequalities.
  • Market access contributes measurably to food security outcomes across the continent.
  • The same open-data pipeline can flag specific underserved regions for targeted infrastructure or policy action.
  • Results support scalable planning that treats market proximity as one adjustable factor in food-system equity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be rerun periodically as new mapping data arrives to track whether infrastructure projects actually close the measured gaps.
  • Overlaying the accessibility layers with climate or conflict datasets might expose additional drivers that compound market isolation.
  • Governments or aid agencies could use the entropy metric to prioritize sites for new markets that increase spatial redundancy in the worst-served zones.

Load-bearing premise

OpenStreetMap and World Food Programme records give a sufficiently complete picture of markets and roads even in remote rural zones where mapping can be sparse or outdated.

What would settle it

A ground-truth survey in one or more rural districts that records actual travel times to markets by local residents and checks whether those times match the model's predictions within a small error margin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07913 by Daniela Paolotti, Kyriaki Kalimeri, Robert Benassai-Dalmau, Rossano Schifanella, Stefania Fiandrino, Vasiliki Voukelatou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pipeline for the computation of the accessibility metrics. This figure illustrates an example from Ethiopia. First, food shops and markets are extracted from OSM and WFP’s market price and Market Functionality Index data. Market centroids are computed to harmonize both datasets. Using either a walking-only or motorized friction surface, we apply a shortest-path routing algorithm to generate a travel time r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spatial accessibility to food markets in Africa. (a) Motorized and (b) walking travel time to the closest market show widespread disparities in accessibility across the continent, with rural and remote areas facing travel times of several hours or more.(c) Entropy illustrates the evenness of market distribution; higher entropy suggests a more balanced spread of accessible markets, typically concentrated in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Population distribution by rural-urban class and market accessibility metrics. This figure shows how Africa’s population is distributed across key accessibility ranges for each metric: (a) motorized and (b) walking travel time, (c) number of markets within 30 minutes (motorized), and (d) entropy. Urban populations (∼360 million) overwhelmingly have better access, while rural and hinterland areas, comprisin… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Correlations between Relative Wealth Index and market accessibility. (a) Correlations between the population averages of the RWI and the market accessibility metrics (motorized and walking travel times, entropy and number of markets within 30 minutes) at second-level administrative unit resolution for the countries of Ghana, Algeria, Ethiopia and Nigeria (coded in the figure as GHA, DZA, ETH and NGA). We a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: displays the distribution of population-weighted market accessibility values, averaged at first-level administrative unit resolution, across different IPC phases. Each region is assigned to its most prevalent IPC phase and shown against the region’s population-average market accessibility. 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Motorized travel time (h) 3 2 1 Spearman: r=0.35, p < 10 3 0 10 20 Walking travel time (h) Spearm… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Food market accessibility is a critical yet underexplored dimension of food systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In this paper, we present a continent-wide assessment of spatial food market accessibility in Africa, integrating open geospatial data from OpenStreetMap and the World Food Programme. We compare three complementary metrics: travel time to the nearest market, market availability within a 30-minute threshold, and an entropy-based measure of spatial distribution, to quantify accessibility across diverse settings. Our analysis reveals pronounced disparities: rural and economically disadvantaged populations face substantially higher travel times, limited market reach, and less spatial redundancy. These accessibility patterns align with socioeconomic stratification, as measured by the Relative Wealth Index, and moderately correlate with food insecurity levels, assessed using the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. We find pronounced disparities in accessibility: rural and economically disadvantaged populations face substantially longer travel times and reduced market availability, with some areas requiring several hours of travel. Overall, results suggest that access to food markets reflects broader geographic and economic inequalities and plays a relevant role in shaping food security outcomes. This framework provides a scalable, data-driven approach for identifying underserved regions and supporting equitable infrastructure planning and policy design across diverse African contexts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a continent-wide assessment of spatial food market accessibility across Africa, integrating OpenStreetMap road networks and market locations with World Food Programme data. It computes three metrics—travel time to the nearest market, binary availability within a 30-minute threshold, and an entropy-based measure of spatial distribution—and reports that rural and economically disadvantaged populations experience substantially higher travel times, lower market availability, and reduced spatial redundancy. These patterns are shown to align with the Relative Wealth Index and to correlate moderately with Integrated Food Security Phase Classification food-insecurity levels, implying that market access reflects broader geographic and economic inequalities.

Significance. If the geospatial inputs are sufficiently complete, the work supplies a scalable, open-data framework for mapping food-access disparities at continental scale. The multi-metric design and explicit correlations with two independent external indices (Relative Wealth Index and IPC) add analytical value and could support targeted infrastructure and food-security planning in low- and middle-income African settings.

major comments (1)
  1. [Data and Methods] Data and Methods section: no validation, completeness check, or sensitivity test is reported for OpenStreetMap market and road coverage in rural or remote grid cells. Because all three accessibility metrics are computed directly from these point and network layers, and because the reported socioeconomic gradients and IPC correlations rest on the same metrics, systematic under-mapping of rural markets would mechanically inflate travel times and depress availability and entropy values for poorer populations, artifactually strengthening the central disparity claims. A minimal robustness exercise—e.g., re-computing metrics after masking cells below a minimum OSM road density or after substituting an independent market inventory for a subsample of countries—would be required to support the results.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the two sentences that begin 'Our analysis reveals pronounced disparities...' and 'We find pronounced disparities in accessibility...' are largely redundant; one can be removed without loss of content.
  2. [Results] Results: the entropy metric is introduced without an explicit formula or normalization details in the main text, making it difficult for readers to judge how it differs from the other two metrics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data and Methods] Data and Methods section: no validation, completeness check, or sensitivity test is reported for OpenStreetMap market and road coverage in rural or remote grid cells. Because all three accessibility metrics are computed directly from these point and network layers, and because the reported socioeconomic gradients and IPC correlations rest on the same metrics, systematic under-mapping of rural markets would mechanically inflate travel times and depress availability and entropy values for poorer populations, artifactually strengthening the central disparity claims. A minimal robustness exercise—e.g., re-computing metrics after masking cells below a minimum OSM road density or after substituting an independent market inventory for a subsample of countries—would be required to support the results.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit validation or sensitivity tests for OpenStreetMap (OSM) coverage represents a limitation in the current manuscript. OSM is the most comprehensive open geospatial resource available at continental scale, yet we recognize that variable mapping completeness in rural areas could introduce bias into the accessibility metrics and their correlations with wealth and food-security indicators. To address this directly, we will add a dedicated subsection to the Methods and Results sections. This will include: (i) descriptive statistics on OSM road density and market point density stratified by urban/rural classification and Relative Wealth Index quintiles; (ii) a sensitivity analysis that recomputes all three accessibility metrics after excluding grid cells below a minimum road-density threshold; and (iii) a comparison of OSM-derived market locations against independent national or WFP market inventories for at least two countries where such data are publicly available. These additions will be presented with updated figures and tables in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical analysis on external geospatial data with standard GIS computations

full rationale

The paper conducts a continent-scale observational study by integrating independent open datasets (OpenStreetMap road networks and market points, World Food Programme market locations) and applying standard GIS operations to derive travel-time, availability, and entropy metrics. These are then correlated against external indices (Relative Wealth Index, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification). No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes are used to define or predict the core outputs; the results are computed directly from the input data layers without reduction to quantities constructed by the authors themselves. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the assumption that open geospatial datasets accurately represent real-world market locations and travel networks across diverse African contexts.

free parameters (1)
  • 30-minute travel threshold
    Arbitrary cutoff chosen to define market availability; not derived from data or theory.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption OpenStreetMap data sufficiently captures food market locations and road networks for accessibility calculations across Africa
    Invoked as the primary data source without reported validation or completeness checks in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5771 in / 1220 out tokens · 63722 ms · 2026-05-22T16:19:55.675477+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Opoku, E

    Bonuedi, I., Kamasa, K. & Opoku, E. E. O. Enabling trade across borders and food security in africa.Food Secur.12, 1121–1140 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    & Caraher, M

    Lang, T. & Caraher, M. Access to healthy foods: part ii. food poverty and shopping deserts: what are the implications for health promotion policy and practice?Heal. Educ. J.57, 202–211 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    & Yadav, P

    Raja, S., Ma, C. & Yadav, P. Beyond food deserts.J. Plan. Educ. Res.27, 469–482, DOI: 10.1177/0739456X08317461 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1177/0739456x08317461 2008

  4. [4]

    & Gilliland, J

    Larsen, K. & Gilliland, J. Mapping the evolution of ’food deserts’ in a canadian city: Supermarket accessibility in london, ontario, 1961–2005.Int. J. Heal. Geogr.7, 16, DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-16 (2008). Food deserts

    work page doi:10.1186/1476-072x-7-16 1961

  5. [5]

    & Raskin, S

    Short, A., Guthman, J. & Raskin, S. Food deserts, oases, or mirages?J. Plan. Educ. Res.26, 352–364, DOI: 10.1177/0739 456X06297795 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1177/0739 2007

  6. [6]

    Usman, M. A. & Haile, M. G. Market access, household dietary diversity and food security: Evidence from eastern africa. Food Policy113, 102374, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102374 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102374 2022

  7. [7]

    & Blumenstock, J

    Chi, G., Fang, H., Chatterjee, S. & Blumenstock, J. E. Microestimates of wealth for all low- and middle-income countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113658119 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2113658119 2022

  8. [8]

    Fraval, S.et al.Food access deficiencies in sub-saharan africa: Prevalence and implications for agricultural interventions. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.3, DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00104 (2019)

    work page doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00104 2019

  9. [9]

    & Hirvonen, K

    Abay, K. & Hirvonen, K. Does market access mitigate the impact of seasonality on child growth? panel data evidence from northern ethiopia.J. Dev. Stud.53, 1414–1429, DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1251586 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1251586 2016

  10. [10]

    I., Ying, L., Bashir, M

    Ahmed, U. I., Ying, L., Bashir, M. K., Abid, M. & Zulfiqar, F. Status and determinants of small farming households’ food security and role of market access in enhancing food security in rural pakistan.PloS One12, e0185466 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    & Minten, B

    Stifel, D. & Minten, B. Market access, well-being, and nutrition: Evidence from ethiopia.World Dev.90, 229–241, DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.09.009 (2017). 14/17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.09.009 2016

  12. [12]

    & Dereje, M

    Hoddinott, J., Headey, D. & Dereje, M. Cows, missing milk markets, and nutrition in rural ethiopia.The J. Dev. Stud.51, 958–975 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    & Ravula, P

    Nandi, R., Nedumaran, S. & Ravula, P. The interplay between food market access and farm household dietary diversity in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of literature.Glob. Food Secur.28(2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    & Hoddinott, J

    Hirvonen, K. & Hoddinott, J. Agricultural production and children’s diets: Evidence from rural ethiopia.Agric. Econ.48, 469–480 (2017). 17.Wachs, M. & Kumagai, T. G. Physical accessibility as a social indicator.Socio-Economic Plan. Sci.7, 437–456 (1973)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    M., Dumble, P

    Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L. & Wigan, M. R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning.Transp. Res. Part A: Gen.13, 91–109 (1979)

    work page 1979

  16. [16]

    A century of evolution of the accessibility concept.Transp

    Levine, J. A century of evolution of the accessibility concept.Transp. research part D: transport environment83, 102309 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    & Thomas, J

    Penchansky, R. & Thomas, J. W. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction.Med. care19, 127–140 (1981)

    work page 1981

  18. [18]

    Geurs, K. T. & van Wee, B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions.J. Transp. Geogr.12, 127–140, DOI: 10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2003.10.005 (2004). 22.Handy, S. L. & Niemeier, D. A. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives (1997)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 2003

  19. [19]

    Palacios, M. S. & El-geneidy, A. Cumulative versus gravity-based accessibility measures: Which one to use?Findings DOI: 10.32866/001c.32444 (2022)

    work page doi:10.32866/001c.32444 2022

  20. [20]

    & Delamater, P

    Pan, J., Liu, H., Wang, X., Xie, H. & Delamater, P. L. Assessing the spatial accessibility of hospital care in sichuan province, china.Geospatial Heal.10, 261–270, DOI: 10.4081/gh.2015.384 (2015)

    work page doi:10.4081/gh.2015.384 2015

  21. [21]

    J.et al.Global maps of travel time to healthcare facilities.Nat

    Weiss, D. J.et al.Global maps of travel time to healthcare facilities.Nat. Medicine 2020 26:1226, 1835–1838, DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1059-1 (2020). Used OSM (HealthSites) data for healthcare facilities

    work page doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1059-1 2020

  22. [22]

    T., Dullie, L

    Palk, L., Okano, J. T., Dullie, L. & Blower, S. Travel time to health-care facilities, mode of transportation, and hiv elimination in malawi: a geospatial modelling analysis.The Lancet Glob. Heal.8, e1555–e1564, DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109 X(20)30351-X (2020)

    work page doi:10.1016/s2214-109 2020

  23. [23]

    Guagliardo, M. F. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges.Int. J. Heal. Geogr.3, 3, DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-3-3 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1186/1476-072x-3-3 2004

  24. [24]

    Data6, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0142-2 (2019)

    Maina, J.et al.A spatial database of health facilities managed by the public health sector in sub saharan africa.Sci. Data6, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0142-2 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0142-2 2019

  25. [25]

    S., Radhakrishnan, N

    Rekha, R. S., Radhakrishnan, N. & Mathew, S. Spatial accessibility analysis of schools using geospatial techniques.Spatial Inf. Res.28, 699–708 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    31.World Food Programme

    Gao, Y .et al.Imbalance in spatial accessibility to primary and secondary schools in china: Guidance for education sustainability.Sustainability8, 1236 (2016). 31.World Food Programme. Market Functionality Index, Technical Guidance

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    J.et al.A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015.Nat

    Weiss, D. J.et al.A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015.Nat. 2018 553:7688 553, 333–336, DOI: 10.1038/nature25181 (2018). 33.Hansen, W. G. How accessibility shapes land use.J. Am. Inst. planners25, 73–76 (1959)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature25181 2015

  28. [28]

    Accessibility, entropy and the distribution and assignment of traffic.Transp

    Erlander, S. Accessibility, entropy and the distribution and assignment of traffic.Transp. Res.11, 149–153, DOI: 10.1016/0041-1647(77)90012-0 (1977)

    work page doi:10.1016/0041-1647(77)90012-0 1977

  29. [29]

    Population counts (unconstrained, un-adjusted, 2000–2020, 1 km resolution)

    WorldPop. Population counts (unconstrained, un-adjusted, 2000–2020, 1 km resolution). https://hub.worldpop.org/geodata /listing?id=75 (2020). WorldPop Hub. Accessed: 2026-02-26

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    Africa cities by population 2026

    World Population Review. Africa cities by population 2026. https://worldpopulationreview.com/cities/continent/africa (2026). Accessed: 2026-02-26

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    & McMenomy, T

    Cattaneo, A., Nelson, A. & McMenomy, T. Urban-rural continuum. Figshare, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12579572.v4 (2020)

    work page doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12579572.v4 2020

  32. [32]

    & McMenomy, T

    Cattaneo, A., Nelson, A. & McMenomy, T. Global mapping of urban–rural catchment areas reveals unequal access to services.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2011990118 (2021). 15/17 39.Cattaneo, A.et al.Worldwide delineation of multi-tier city–regions.Nat. Cities1, 469–479 (2024). 40.United Nations Statistics Division. Standard country or area codes for statistic...

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Blumenstock, J., Cadamuro, G. & On, R. Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata.Science350, 1073–1076 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    P., Scribner, R

    Block, J. P., Scribner, R. A. & DeSalvo, K. B. Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: a geographic analysis.Am. journal preventive medicine27, 211–217 (2004)

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Kaufman, P. R. Rural poor have less access to supermarkets, large grocery stores.Rural. Am. Dev. Perspectives13, 19–26 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    N.et al.Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan detroit.Am

    Zenk, S. N.et al.Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan detroit.Am. journal public health95, 660–667 (2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Ipc global platform

    Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC). Ipc global platform. https://www.ipcinfo.org/ (2026). Accessed: 2026-02-26

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    & Gerber, N

    Bonuedi, I., Kornher, L. & Gerber, N. Agricultural seasonality, market access, and food security in sierra leone.Food Secur.14, 471–494, DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01242-z (2022). SLIHS: Study in Sierra Leone

    work page doi:10.1007/s12571-021-01242-z 2022

  39. [39]

    food security18, 93–101 (2018)

    Turner, C.et al.Concepts and critical perspectives for food environment research: a global framework with implications for action in low-and middle-income countries.Glob. food security18, 93–101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    D., Plat, D

    Olvera, L. D., Plat, D. & Pochet, P. The puzzle of mobility and access to the city in sub-saharan africa.J. Transp. Geogr. 32, 56–64 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    & Gerber, N

    Bonuedi, I., Kornher, L. & Gerber, N. Agricultural seasonality, market access, and food security in sierra leone.Food Secur.14, 471–494 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Martin-Shields, C. P. & Stojetz, W. Food security and conflict: Empirical challenges and future opportunities for research and policy making on food security and conflict.World development119, 150–164 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Niles, M. T. & Salerno, J. D. A cross-country analysis of climate shocks and smallholder food insecurity.PloS one13, e0192928 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Headey, D. D. & Martin, W. J. The impact of food prices on poverty and food security.Annu. review resource economics8, 329–351 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Satyam, Aithal, R. K. & Pradhan, D. Resilience of an evolved retail agglomeration: case of rural periodic markets in emerging economies.Int. J. Retail. & Distribution Manag.50, 1395–1411 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Usman, M. A. & Callo-Concha, D. Does market access improve dietary diversity and food security? evidence from southwestern ethiopian smallholder coffee producers.Agric. Food Econ.9, 18, DOI: 10.1186/s40100-021-00190-8 (2021). <b>Ethiopia</b><br/><br/><b>IMPORTANT POINTS.<br/></b><br/>An average household had to travel 4.6 km (around 1h walking) to reach t...

    work page doi:10.1186/s40100-021-00190-8 2021

  47. [47]

    P., Barrett, C

    Reardon, T., Timmer, C. P., Barrett, C. B. & Berdegué, J. The rise of supermarkets in africa, asia, and latin america.Am. journal agricultural economics85, 1140–1146 (2003). 56.Resnick, D.The politics and governance of informal food retail in urban Africa(Intl Food Policy Res Inst, 2020)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Davies, J.et al.Governance of traditional markets and rural-urban food systems in sub-saharan africa.Habitat international 127, 102620 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    & Sivasubramanian, B

    Cook, B., Trevenen-Jones, A. & Sivasubramanian, B. Nutritional, economic, social, and governance implications of traditional food markets for vulnerable populations in sub-saharan africa: a systematic narrative review.Front. Sustain. Food Syst.8, 1382383 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    OpenStreetMap Wiki contributors. Food. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Food&oldid=2677004 (2024). Retrieved February 26, 2026. 60.World Food Programme. Market price database, 1990–2024 (2024). 1990–2024. 61.World Food Programme. Market functionality index database, 2020–2024 (2024). 2020–2024. 62.Rustein, S. O. & Johnson, K. The dhs wealt...

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Bing maps tile system

    Microsoft Corporation. Bing maps tile system. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/bingmaps/articles/bing-maps-tile-system (2026). Accessed: 2026-02-26

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    A literature review of the use of gis-based measures of access to health care services.Heal

    Higgs, G. A literature review of the use of gis-based measures of access to health care services.Heal. Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol.5, 119–139 (2004)

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    & Shearer, J

    O’Sullivan, D., Morrison, A. & Shearer, J. Using desktop gis for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach.Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.14, 85–104 (2000)

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    Xi, Y ., Miller, E. J. & Saxe, S. Exploring the impact of different cut-off times on isochrone measurements of accessibility. Transp. Res. Rec.2672, 113–124 (2018). 67.Van der Walt, S.et al.scikit-image: Image processing in python.PeerJ2, e453, DOI: 10.7717/peerj.453 (2014)

    work page doi:10.7717/peerj.453 2018

  55. [55]

    Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers.Environ

    Shen, Q. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers.Environ. planning B: Plan. Des.25, 345–365 (1998)

    work page 1998

  56. [56]

    & Wang, F

    Luo, W. & Wang, F. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a gis environment: synthesis and a case study in the chicago region.Environ. planning B: planning design30, 865–884 (2003). Acknowledgements We would like to thank Duccio Piovani, Frances Knight, Kyriacos Koupparis, Angela Di Perna, Ibrahima Mamadou Diarra, and Jonas De Meyer for the s...

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    No parametric dependence

    work page

  58. [58]

    Bridges cumulative and travel time Cons

    work page

  59. [59]

    Bias towards populated areas

    work page

  60. [60]

    Arbitrary threshold radius

    work page

  61. [61]

    Does not consider quantity

    work page

  62. [62]

    Assumes consumers only travel to the closest market

    work page

  63. [63]

    Not interpretable units

    work page

  64. [64]

    Assumed travel behaviour in the absence of data

    work page

  65. [65]

    4 maps raw Open- StreetMap (OSM) amenities and WFP market points in Ethiopia and Nigeria before centroid clustering

    Lack of references in the literature 5 OSM and WFP data coverage in Ethiopia and Nigeria To visualise complementarity between data sources, In Fig. 4 maps raw Open- StreetMap (OSM) amenities and WFP market points in Ethiopia and Nigeria before centroid clustering. WFP points concentrate in food-insecure or sparsely mapped regions (e.g., Somali Region in E...

    work page

  66. [66]

    Friction-surface routing represents a continuous cost landscape incorporating roads, land cover, slope, and off-road travel, allowing movement across all terrain types

    work page

  67. [67]

    Spearman correlation coefficients wereρ= 0.99 for unbounded pairs andρ= 0.85 for a maximum OD separation of 80 km for motorized transport

    Network-based routing (ORS) is constrained to mapped road and pedestrian networks and may underestimate connectivity in areas where road mapping is incomplete. Spearman correlation coefficients wereρ= 0.99 for unbounded pairs andρ= 0.85 for a maximum OD separation of 80 km for motorized transport. For walking,ρ= 0.85 with a maximum separation between the ...

    work page