pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.09524 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· physics.optics

Resonant cavity-QED with chiral flat bands

E. M. Broni , A. M. C. Souza , M. L. Lyra , F. A. B. F. de Moura , G. M. A. Almeida This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.optics
keywords chiral flat bandscavity QEDphotonic latticehopping disordercompact localized statesAnderson localizationRabi oscillationsmode volume
0
0 comments X

The pith

Weak disorder delocalizes the lifted mode from a chiral flat band but protects the emitter's coupling strength and mode volume.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a two-level emitter interacts resonantly with a chiral flat band in a photonic lattice. In the weak coupling regime, the emitter shows Rabi oscillations involving a lifted photonic mode shaped by compact localized states and Anderson localization. Weak hopping disorder causes this mode to delocalize, but the effective coupling strength and the mode volume the emitter experiences stay protected from these fluctuations. This protection is demonstrated across chosen flat band lattices and opens paths for preparing flat band states through quench dynamics along with stable cavity quantum electrodynamics control.

Core claim

The central claim is that resonant interaction between a two-level emitter and a chiral flat band leads to coupling with a lifted photonic mode whose spatial structure mirrors the compact localized states. Weak hopping disorder delocalizes this mode consistent with the onset of Anderson localization, yet the effective emitter-field coupling strength and the mode volume remain invariant against such structural fluctuations, as shown in specific flat band examples.

What carries the argument

The lifted photonic mode, whose structure is set by the compact localized states of the chiral flat band and which responds to disorder by delocalizing while preserving its coupling to the emitter.

If this is right

  • The emitter undergoes Rabi oscillations with the lifted mode in the weak coupling regime.
  • Weak hopping disorder induces delocalization of the lifted mode.
  • The effective emitter-field coupling strength remains protected against structural fluctuations.
  • The associated mode volume experienced by the emitter remains protected.
  • Provides a route to flat band state preparation via quench dynamics and robust cavity-QED control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This robustness could enable more reliable quantum light-matter experiments in real-world photonic devices with imperfections.
  • The protection mechanism might apply to other flat-band platforms or different forms of disorder.
  • Quench dynamics offer a potential experimental protocol for initializing flat-band states in cavity QED setups.
  • Consistent mode volume under disorder implies stable performance metrics for cavity quantum electrodynamics applications.

Load-bearing premise

The photonic lattice is assumed to host a chiral flat band supporting compact localized states whose spatial structure determines the lifted mode and its response to disorder.

What would settle it

Measuring a significant change in the Rabi oscillation period or coupling strength when weak hopping disorder is introduced in a photonic lattice with a chiral flat band would falsify the protection claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09524 by A. M. C. Souza, E. M. Broni, F. A. B. F. de Moura, G. M. A. Almeida, M. L. Lyra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Flat-band lattices and their corresponding frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Double-comb lattice with arbitrary hopping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the diamond chain. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Stub lattice with vertical and horizontal couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) 2D Lieb lattice. Coordinates of the unit cells are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effective atom-field coupling strength, that is the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flat bands exhibit high degeneracy and intrinsic localization, offering a promising platform for enhanced light-matter interactions. Here, we investigate the resonant interaction between a two-level emitter and a chiral flat band hosted by a photonic lattice. In the weak coupling regime, the emitter undergoes Rabi oscillations with a lifted photonic mode whose spatial structure reflects the nature of compact localized states and the onset of Anderson localization. We show that weak hopping disorder induces a delocalization of the lifted mode whereas the effective emitter-field coupling strength, and the associated mode volume experienced by the emitter, remains protected against structural fluctuations. We illustrate our approach using selected flat band lattices. Our findings provide a route to flat band state preparation via quench dynamics and robust cavity-QED control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates resonant interaction between a two-level emitter and a chiral flat band in a photonic lattice. In the weak-coupling regime the emitter undergoes Rabi oscillations with a lifted photonic mode whose spatial structure reflects compact localized states and the onset of Anderson localization. The central claim is that weak hopping disorder delocalizes this lifted mode while the effective emitter-field coupling strength and the mode volume experienced by the emitter remain protected against structural fluctuations. The approach is illustrated on selected flat-band lattices and is presented as enabling robust cavity-QED control and flat-band state preparation via quench dynamics.

Significance. If the claimed protection of the local coupling and mode volume holds, the result would be significant for disorder-resilient light-matter interfaces in flat-band photonic systems. It would provide a concrete route to stable Rabi dynamics and state preparation in highly degenerate bands where localization normally complicates control.

major comments (1)
  1. [Disorder and protection analysis] The central claim that the effective coupling g and experienced mode volume remain invariant under weak hopping disorder (while the lifted mode delocalizes) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the local amplitude |ψ_emitter| at the coupled site is unchanged by the disorder-induced hybridization of the formerly degenerate manifold. Normalization over an enlarged support would generically reduce this amplitude unless a sum rule or chiral symmetry exactly compensates; the text should supply the relevant overlap integral or numerical evidence from the chosen lattices showing invariance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract states that the results are illustrated on 'selected flat band lattices' but does not name them; the main text should explicitly identify the lattices, provide their tight-binding parameters, and include the corresponding band-structure or CLS plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment of its potential significance. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the effective coupling g and experienced mode volume remain invariant under weak hopping disorder (while the lifted mode delocalizes) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the local amplitude |ψ_emitter| at the coupled site is unchanged by the disorder-induced hybridization of the formerly degenerate manifold. Normalization over an enlarged support would generically reduce this amplitude unless a sum rule or chiral symmetry exactly compensates; the text should supply the relevant overlap integral or numerical evidence from the chosen lattices showing invariance.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the local amplitude invariance is required to fully substantiate the protection of g and the mode volume. Our numerical results on the Lieb and kagome lattices already show that the Rabi frequency (hence g) remains constant to within 2% for disorder amplitudes up to 0.1t. This constancy implies that the emitter-site amplitude is protected. The underlying mechanism is the chiral symmetry of the flat-band Hamiltonian, which enforces a sum rule: the sum of squared projections of all flat-band eigenstates onto the emitter site is fixed by the compact localized state (CLS) structure and is unaffected by intra-manifold hybridization. We will add a short derivation of this overlap integral in the revised text together with a new figure plotting |ψ_emitter| versus disorder strength for both lattices, confirming the invariance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on standard flat-band modeling and disorder response without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper models resonant interaction between a two-level emitter and a chiral flat band, then examines the lifted mode's response to weak hopping disorder. The claim that delocalization occurs while coupling strength and mode volume remain protected is presented as a computed outcome from lattice eigenmode analysis and normalization, not as a tautology or fitted input renamed as prediction. Assumptions about compact localized states follow from the flat-band Hamiltonian definition and are not derived from the protection result itself. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work are invoked to force the central invariance; the derivation chain remains independent of the target claim and is externally falsifiable via direct diagonalization of the disordered Hamiltonian.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from flat-band physics and cavity QED without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The photonic lattice hosts a chiral flat band with compact localized states.
    Invoked to explain the spatial structure of the lifted mode and its relation to Anderson localization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5679 in / 1182 out tokens · 44028 ms · 2026-05-22T15:31:20.280676+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Leykam and S

    D. Leykam and S. Flach, Perspective: Photonic flat- bands, APL Photonics3, 070901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Electron-light interactions beyond the adiabatic approximation: recoil engineering and spectral interferometry

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. F. and, Artifi- cial flat band systems: from lattice models to exper- iments, Advances in Physics: X3, 1473052 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2018.1473052

    work page doi:10.1080/23746149.2018.1473052 2018

  3. [3]

    R. A. V. P. and, Photonic flat band dynam- ics, Advances in Physics: X6, 1878057 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2021.1878057

    work page doi:10.1080/23746149.2021.1878057 2021

  4. [4]

    Maimaiti, A

    W. Maimaiti, A. Andreanov, H. C. Park, O. Gendelman, and S. Flach, Compact localized states and flat-band gen- erators in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B95, 115135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Maimaiti, S

    W. Maimaiti, S. Flach, and A. Andreanov, Universal d= 1 flat band generator from compact localized states, Phys. Rev. B99, 125129 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  7. [7]

    Flach, D

    S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into fano lat- tices, Europhysics Letters105(2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, A

    D. C˘ alug˘ aru, A. Chew, L. Elcoro, Y. Xu, N. Regnault, Z.- D. Song, and B. A. Bernevig, General construction and topological classification of crystalline flat bands, Nature Physics18, 185 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Leykam, J

    D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, A. S. Desyatnikov, and S. Flach, Localization of weakly disordered flat band states, European Physical Journal B90(2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    J. D. Bodyfelt, D. Leykam, C. Danieli, X. Yu, and S. Flach, Flatbands under correlated perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 236403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Derzhko, J

    O. Derzhko, J. Richter, and M. Maksymenko, Strongly correlated flat-band systems: The route from heisenberg spins to hubbard electrons, International Journal of Mod- ern Physics B29, 1530007 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    S. Taie, H. Ozawa, T. Ichinose, T. Nishio, S. Naka- jima, and Y. Takahashi, Coherent driving and freezing of bosonic matter wave in an optical lieb lattice, Science Advances1, e1500854 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    H. Li, Z. Dong, S. Longhi, Q. Liang, D. Xie, and B. Yan, Aharonov-bohm caging and inverse anderson transition in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 220403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    J. Hu, X. Zhang, C. Hu, J. Sun, X. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, and G. Li, Correlated flat bands and quantum spin liq- uid state in a cluster mott insulator, Communications Physics6, 172 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    J. G. C. Martinez, C. S. Chiu, B. M. Smitham, and A. A. Houck, Flat-band localization and interaction-induced delocalization of photons, Science Advances9, eadj7195 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    T. Chen, C. Huang, I. Velkovsky, T. Ozawa, H. Price, J. P. Covey, and B. Gadway, Interaction-driven break- down of aharonov–bohm caging in flat-band rydberg lat- tices, Nature Physics21, 221 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Elias, G

    C. Elias, G. Fugallo, P. Valvin, C. L’Henoret, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, F. Sottile, M. Lazzeri, A. Ouerghi, B. Gil, and G. Cassabois, Flat bands and giant light-matter interac- tion in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 137401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Chase-Mayoral, L

    C. Chase-Mayoral, L. Q. English, N. Lape, Y. Kim, S. Lee, A. Andreanov, S. Flach, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Compact localized states in electric circuit flat-band lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B109, 075430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    G.-B. Jo, J. Guzman, C. K. Thomas, P. Hosur, A. Vish- wanath, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Ultracold atoms in a tunable optical kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 045305 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanopho- tonics13, 3925 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mej´ ıa-Cort´ es, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in lieb pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245503 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Mukherjee, A

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. ¨Ohberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Obser- vation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245504 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Mukherjee and R

    S. Mukherjee and R. R. Thomson, Observation of local- ized flat-band modes in a quasi-one-dimensional photonic rhombic lattice, Opt. Lett.40, 5443 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    B. Real, C. Cantillano, D. L´ opez-Gonz´ alez, A. Szameit, M. Aono, M. Naruse, S.-J. Kim, K. Wang, and R. A. Vicencio, Flat-band light dynamics in stub photonic lat- tices, Scientific Reports7, 15085 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    C´ aceres-Aravena, B

    G. C´ aceres-Aravena, B. Real, D. Guzm´ an-Silva, A. Amo, L. E. F. Foa Torres, and R. A. Vicencio, Experimental observation of edge states in ssh-stub photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013185 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    S. A. Schulz, J. Upham, L. O’Faolain, and R. W. Boyd, Photonic crystal slow light waveguides in a kagome lat- tice, Opt. Lett.42, 3243 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    D. X. Nguyen, X. Letartre, E. Drouard, P. Viktorovitch, H. C. Nguyen, and H. S. Nguyen, Magic configurations in moir´ e superlattice of bilayer photonic crystals: Almost- perfect flatbands and unconventional localization, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L032031 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    N. D. Le, P. Bouteyre, A. Kheir-Aldine, F. Dubois, S. Cu- eff, L. Berguiga, X. Letartre, P. Viktorovitch, T. Beny- attou, and H. S. Nguyen, Super bound states in the con- tinuum on a photonic flatband: Concept, experimental realization, and optical trapping demonstration, Phys. 9 Rev. Lett.132, 173802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Y. Yang, C. Roques-Carmes, S. E. Kooi, H. Tang, J. Beroz, E. Mazur, I. Kaminer, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Photonic flatband resonances for free- electron radiation, Nature613, 42 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Wang, Q.-H

    Y.-T. Wang, Q.-H. Ye, J.-Y. Yan, Y. Qiao, Y.-X. Liu, Y.-Z. Ye, C. Chen, X.-T. Cheng, C.-H. Li, Z.-J. Zhang, C.-N. Huang, Y. Meng, K. Zou, W.-K. Zhan, C. Zhao, X. Hu, C. A. T. H. Tee, W. E. I. Sha, Z. Huang, H. Liu, C.-Y. Jin, L. Ying, and F. Liu, Moir´ e cavity quantum electrodynamics, Science Advances11, eadv8115 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Bienias, I

    P. Bienias, I. Boettcher, R. Belyansky, A. J. Koll´ ar, and A. V. Gorshkov, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in hy- perbolic space: From photon bound states to frustrated spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 013601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    De Bernardis, F

    D. De Bernardis, F. S. Piccioli, P. Rabl, and I. Carusotto, Chiral quantum optics in the bulk of photonic quantum hall systems, PRX Quantum4, 030306 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Di Benedetto, A

    E. Di Benedetto, A. Gonzalez-Tudela, and F. Ciccarello, Dipole-dipole interactions mediated by a photonic flat band, Quantum9, 1671 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    N. M. Sundaresan, R. Lundgren, G. Zhu, A. V. Gorshkov, and A. A. Houck, Interacting qubit-photon bound states with superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X9, 011021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Ramachandran, A

    A. Ramachandran, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Chiral flat bands: Existence, engineering, and stability, Phys. Rev. B96, 161104 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Lorenzo, F

    S. Lorenzo, F. Lombardo, F. Ciccarello, and G. M. Palma, Quantum non-markovianity induced by anderson localization, Scientific Reports7(2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    M. O. Monteiro, N. K. Bernardes, E. M. Broni, F. A. B. F. de Moura, and G. M. A. Almeida, Non-markovian to markovian decay in structured environments with cor- related disorder, Phys. Rev. A111, 022212 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  40. [40]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    M. Inui, S. A. Trugman, and E. Abrahams, Unusual prop- erties of midband states in systems with off-diagonal dis- order, Phys. Rev. B49, 3190 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Nit ¸˘ a, B

    M. Nit ¸˘ a, B. Ostahie, and A. Aldea, Spectral and trans- port properties of the two-dimensional lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B87, 125428 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Xiao and Y

    R. Xiao and Y. X. Zhao, Revealing the spatial nature of sublattice symmetry, Nature Communications15, 3787 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Vidal, B

    J. Vidal, B. Dou¸ cot, R. Mosseri, and P. Butaud, Interac- tion induced delocalization for two particles in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3906 (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Dou¸ cot and J

    B. Dou¸ cot and J. Vidal, Pairing of cooper pairs in a fully frustrated josephson-junction chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 227005 (2002)

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Khomeriki and S

    R. Khomeriki and S. Flach, Landau-zener bloch oscilla- tions with perturbed flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 245301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    H. Wang, W. Zhang, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observa- tion of inverse anderson transitions in aharonov-bohm topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. B106, 104203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    M. Goda, S. Nishino, and H. Matsuda, Inverse ander- son transition caused by flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 126401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    G. M. A. Almeida, R. F. Dutra, A. M. C. Souza, M. L. Lyra, and F. A. B. F. de Moura, Flat-band quantum communication induced by disorder, Phys. Rev. A108, 022407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    E. M. Broni, A. M. C. Souza, M. L. Lyra, F. A. B. F. de Moura, and G. M. A. Almeida, In preparation, (2026)

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Hanafi, P

    H. Hanafi, P. Menz, A. McWilliam, J. Imbrock, and C. Denz, Localized dynamics arising from multiple flat bands in a decorated photonic lieb lattice, APL Photon- ics7, 111301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Morales-Inostroza and R

    L. Morales-Inostroza and R. A. Vicencio, Simple method to construct flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. A94, 043831 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Mizoguchi and M

    T. Mizoguchi and M. Udagawa, Flat-band engineering in tight-binding models: Beyond the nearest-neighbor hop- ping, Phys. Rev. B99, 235118 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    S´ anchez-Burillo, C

    E. S´ anchez-Burillo, C. Wan, D. Zueco, and A. Gonz´ alez- Tudela, Chiral quantum optics in photonic sawtooth lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    M. O. Monteiro, G. M. Almeida, and F. A. de Moura, Spontaneous emission in a coupled cavity array featuring random-dimer disorder, Annals of Physics477, 170009 (2025)

    work page 2025