pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.17194 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Security of deterministic key distribution with higher-dimensional systems

Abhishek Muhuri , Ayan Patra , Rivu Gupta , Tamoghna Das , Aditi Sen De This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum key distributionhigher-dimensional systemsindividual attackscollective attacksmutually unbiased basesHeisenberg-Weyl operatorsentropic uncertainty relationstwo-way protocols
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-dimensional systems in two-way quantum key distribution generate secret keys against stronger individual attacks and greater collective eavesdropping.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the security of a deterministic two-way quantum key distribution protocol that operates with qudits of any finite dimension. It demonstrates that increasing the dimension permits secret key generation even when an eavesdropper performs stronger cloning-based individual attacks, and it maintains higher key rates under collective attacks by using a purification approach combined with entropic uncertainty relations. The work avoids effective entanglement in the protocol itself and instead relies on two mutually unbiased bases along with Heisenberg-Weyl operators to bound the eavesdropper's information. This matters because it points to a route for more noise-tolerant quantum communication that could function with simpler state preparation than entanglement-based alternatives. The protocol is also compared to an entangled dense-coding version under models of correlated and uncorrelated noise.

Core claim

The central claim is that a two-way deterministic key distribution protocol using arbitrary finite-dimensional systems, two mutually unbiased bases, and Heisenberg-Weyl operators achieves secret key generation for greater interception strengths in individual cloning attacks and exhibits monotonically increasing robustness to collective eavesdropping as the dimension grows, with the asymptotic key rate derived via a purification scheme and entropic uncertainty relations without requiring effective entanglement.

What carries the argument

Two mutually unbiased bases together with Heisenberg-Weyl operators in higher dimensions, which bound the eavesdropper's information for both cloning attacks and collective attacks through purification and uncertainty relations.

If this is right

  • Secret keys remain extractable for interception strengths where lower-dimensional versions produce zero rate.
  • The asymptotic key rate under collective attacks stays positive for stronger noise levels as dimension rises.
  • The protocol outperforms an entangled two-way dense-coding scheme when eavesdropper noise is modeled as correlated or uncorrelated.
  • Security analysis holds without the need to prepare or distribute entangled states in the actual key-distribution step.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Practical devices that naturally support higher-dimensional encoding, such as orbital-angular-momentum photons, could be tested directly for the predicted dimensional gain in attack tolerance.
  • The same bounding technique might extend to other two-way protocols that currently rely on entanglement, potentially simplifying hardware requirements.
  • Numerical checks of the key-rate formula for dimensions four through eight would reveal how quickly the robustness saturates.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen two mutually unbiased bases and Heisenberg-Weyl operators are assumed to fully capture every possible piece of information an eavesdropper could extract in both individual and collective attacks.

What would settle it

Measure the secret key rate in a laboratory implementation of the protocol with dimension three under controlled cloning attacks of varying strength and check whether positive rates persist beyond the threshold predicted for dimension two.

read the original abstract

We analyze the security of two-way quantum key distribution using arbitrary finite-dimensional systems, considering both individual and collective eavesdropping attacks, without the effective use of entangled states, by incorporating two mutually unbiased bases and Heisenberg-Weyl operators in higher dimensions. For individual attacks, we consider cloning operations by the eavesdropper and demonstrate a dimensional advantage where secret keys can be generated for greater strengths of interception. To analyze security under collective attacks, we employ a purification scheme and derive the key rate using entropic uncertainty relations. Further, we exhibit how the protocol is more robust against eavesdropping with increasing dimension of the systems used, and compare the performance with that of the entangled two-way secure dense coding protocol when the presence of the eavesdropper is modeled by correlated and uncorrelated noise.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the security of a two-way deterministic quantum key distribution protocol that uses arbitrary finite-dimensional systems, two mutually unbiased bases, and Heisenberg-Weyl operators, without effective entanglement. For individual attacks it derives a dimensional advantage via cloning maps, allowing secret-key generation against stronger interception as dimension increases. For collective attacks it employs a specific purification scheme followed by entropic uncertainty relations to obtain a lower bound on the key rate, claiming increased robustness with dimension; performance is also compared to an entangled two-way dense-coding protocol under correlated and uncorrelated noise models.

Significance. If the purification construction and resulting bounds are shown to be tight against all admissible collective attacks, the work would supply concrete evidence that high-dimensional two-way protocols can tolerate stronger eavesdropping than their qubit counterparts while remaining entanglement-free, which is relevant for practical QKD implementations that seek to exploit larger alphabets.

major comments (1)
  1. §4 (collective-attack analysis): the lower bound on the secret-key rate is obtained after a purification that models the eavesdropper’s information exclusively via the two chosen MUBs and the associated Heisenberg-Weyl operators. It is not shown that every possible collective attack in dimension d>2 can be represented by such a purification; an optimal attack employing a different set of generalized Pauli operators or non-Weyl unitaries could evade the bound, rendering the claimed dimensional robustness for collective attacks conditional on this modeling choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and §3 state that the protocol exhibits “increased robustness against eavesdropping with increasing dimension,” yet the numerical plots in Fig. 4 only show the key rate for d=2,3,4 under a single noise model; explicit comparison tables or additional curves for d=5,6 would strengthen the claim.
  2. Notation for the cloning fidelity and the entropic quantities is introduced without a consolidated table; a short appendix listing all symbols and their definitions would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (collective-attack analysis): the lower bound on the secret-key rate is obtained after a purification that models the eavesdropper’s information exclusively via the two chosen MUBs and the associated Heisenberg-Weyl operators. It is not shown that every possible collective attack in dimension d>2 can be represented by such a purification; an optimal attack employing a different set of generalized Pauli operators or non-Weyl unitaries could evade the bound, rendering the claimed dimensional robustness for collective attacks conditional on this modeling choice.

    Authors: We agree that our purification construction is tailored to the protocol's use of two specific mutually unbiased bases and the associated Heisenberg-Weyl operators. The resulting lower bound on the key rate therefore applies to collective attacks whose action on the transmitted qudits can be captured by this modeling choice. We do not claim, nor does the manuscript demonstrate, that the bound holds against every conceivable collective attack in d > 2. To address this point we will revise Section 4 to (i) explicitly state the class of attacks for which the bound is derived, (ii) clarify that the dimensional robustness is shown within this class, and (iii) note that extending the analysis to fully general collective attacks remains an interesting open direction. This revision will be accompanied by a short discussion of why the chosen purification is natural given the protocol's measurement structure. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; key-rate bounds derived from standard entropic relations and purification

full rationale

The paper derives individual-attack security via explicit cloning maps on higher-dimensional systems and collective-attack rates via a purification scheme plus entropic uncertainty relations applied to two MUBs and Heisenberg-Weyl operators. These steps are standard QKD techniques and do not reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The claimed dimensional robustness follows from direct comparison of the resulting key-rate expressions against noise models, without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not equate outputs to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard quantum mechanics, properties of mutually unbiased bases, and entropic uncertainty relations; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Properties of mutually unbiased bases and Heisenberg-Weyl operators hold in arbitrary finite dimensions.
    Invoked to model the protocol states and eavesdropper information.
  • domain assumption Entropic uncertainty relations provide tight bounds on eavesdropper information under the purification scheme.
    Used to derive the key rate for collective attacks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5666 in / 1246 out tokens · 33873 ms · 2026-05-22T13:19:14.475717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gisin, G

    N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, Quan- tum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys.74(2002) 145–195. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145. doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.74.145

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 2002

  2. [2]

    Scarani, H

    V . Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lütkenhaus, M. Peev, The security of practical quantum key distribution, Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 1301–1350. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1301 2009

  3. [3]

    Horodecki, M

    R. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, P . Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009)865–942. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  4. [4]

    Bell nonlocality

    N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V . Scarani, S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys.86 (2014)839.arXiv:quant-ph/1303.2849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991)661–663. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.67.661

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 1991

  6. [6]

    Mayers, A

    D. Mayers, A. Yao, Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus, in: Proceedings39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280), IEEE Comput. Soc,1998, pp. 503–509. doi:10.1109/SFCS.1998.743501

    work page doi:10.1109/sfcs.1998.743501 1998

  7. [7]

    Gottesman, H.-K

    D. Gottesman, H.-K. Lo, N. Lutkenhaus, J. Preskill, Security of quantum key distribution with im- perfect devices, in: International Symposium onInformation Theory,2004. ISIT2004. Proceed- ings., IEEE,2004, pp.135–135. doi:10.1109/ ISIT.2004.1365172

    work page arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    A. Acín, J. Bae, E. Bagan, M. Baig, L. Masanes, R. Muñoz-Tapia, Secrecy properties of quan- tum channels, Phys. Rev. A.73(2006) 012327. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012327. arXiv:arXiv:quant-ph/0411092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012327 2006

  9. [9]

    A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, V . Scarani, Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks, Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 230501. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 2007

  10. [10]

    Masanes, S

    L. Masanes, S. Pironio, A. Acín, Secure device- independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices, Nat. Commun.2(2011). URL:https://doi.org/10. 1038/ncomms1244. doi:10.1038/ncomms1244

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1244 2011

  11. [11]

    Scalable Quantum Simula- tion of Molecular Energies

    S. Pironio, L. Masanes, A. Leverrier, A. Acín, Security of device-independent quantum key distribution in the bounded-quantum-storage model, Phys. Rev. X3(2013)031007. URL:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX. 3.031007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx 2013

  12. [12]

    Vazirani, T

    U. Vazirani, T. Vidick, Fully device-independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014)140501. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140501 2014

  13. [13]

    C. A. Miller, Y. Shi, Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys us- ing untrusted quantum devices, Journal of the ACM63(2016)1–63. doi:10.1145/2885493

    work page doi:10.1145/2885493 2016

  14. [14]

    M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Quantum Compu- tation and Quantum Information:10th Anniver- sary Edition, Cambridge University Press,2010. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511976667

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2010

  15. [15]

    M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory, Cambridge University Press,2013. doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139525343

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Preskill, CreateSpace Independent Publish- ing Platform,2015

    J. Preskill, CreateSpace Independent Publish- ing Platform,2015. URL:http://theory. caltech.edu/~preskill/ph229/. doi:http: //theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/ph229/

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press,2018

    J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press,2018. doi:10.1017/ 9781316848142

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Quantum cryptog- raphy: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theoretical Computer Science560(2014)7–11. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0304397514004241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs. 2014.05.025, theoretical Aspects of Quantum Cryptography – celebrating30years of BB84. 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tcs 2014

  19. [19]

    Bruß, Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states, Phys

    D. Bruß, Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998)3018–3021. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3018 1998

  20. [20]

    Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N

    H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. Gisin, Incoher- ent and coherent eavesdropping in the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. A59(1999)4238–4248. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4238. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4238

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.59.4238 1999

  21. [21]

    Tomamichel, C

    M. Tomamichel, C. C. W. Lim, N. Gisin, R. Ren- ner, Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryp- tography, Nature Communications3(2012)634. doi:10.1038/ncomms1631

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1631 2012

  22. [22]

    Boström, T

    K. Boström, T. Felbinger, Determinis- tic secure direct communication using en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 187902. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187902. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.187902 2002

  23. [23]

    Lucamarini, S

    M. Lucamarini, S. Mancini, Secure deterministic communication without entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005)140501. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.140501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.140501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.140501 2005

  24. [24]

    ping-pong

    Q.-y. Cai, The “ping-pong” protocol can be attacked without eavesdropping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(2003)109801. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.109801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.109801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.109801 2003

  25. [25]

    ping-pong

    A. Wójcik, Eavesdropping on the “ping-pong” quantum communication protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(2003)157901. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.157901 2003

  26. [26]

    F.-G. Deng, G. L. Long, X.-S. Liu, Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the einstein-podolsky-rosen pair block, Phys. Rev. A68 (2003)042317. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042317. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.68.042317

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042317 2003

  27. [27]

    F.-G. Deng, G. L. Long, Secure direct communica- tion with a quantum one-time pad, Phys. Rev. A69 (2004)052319. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052319. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.69.052319

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052319 2004

  28. [28]

    Cai, B.-w

    Q.-y. Cai, B.-w. Li, Improving the capacity of the boström-felbinger protocol, Phys. Rev. A69 (2004)054301. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.054301. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.69.054301

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.69.054301 2004

  29. [29]

    Lu, C.-H

    H. Lu, C.-H. F. Fung, X. Ma, Q.-y. Cai, Unconditional security proof of a determin- istic quantum key distribution with a two- way quantum channel, Phys. Rev. A84 (2011)042344. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042344. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.84.042344

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84.042344 2011

  30. [30]

    C.-H. F. Fung, X. Ma, H. F. Chau, Q.-y. Cai, Quan- tum key distribution with delayed privacy amplifi- cation and its application to the security proof of a two-way deterministic protocol, Phys. Rev. A85 (2012)032308. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032308. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.85.032308

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.032308 2012

  31. [31]

    Bechmann-Pasquinucci, W

    H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, W. Tittel, Quantum cryptography using larger alphabets, Phys. Rev. A61(2000)062308. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062308. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062308

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.61.062308 2000

  32. [32]

    Bourennane, A

    M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, G. Björk, Quantum key distribution using multi- level encoding, Phys. Rev. A64(2001) 012306. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012306

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012306 2001

  33. [33]

    Bourennane, A

    M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, G. Bj rk, N. Gisin, N. J. Cerf, Quantum key distribution using mul- tilevel encoding: security analysis, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General35(2002) 10065–10076. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/47/ 307

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/47/ 2002

  34. [34]

    G. M. Nikolopoulos, K. S. Ranade, G. Al- ber, Error tolerance of two-basis quantum- key-distribution protocols using qudits and two- way classical communication, Phys. Rev. A73 (2006)032325. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032325. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.73.032325

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.73.032325 2006

  35. [35]

    Sasaki, Y

    T. Sasaki, Y. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, Practical quan- tum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance, Nature509(2014)475–478. doi:10.1038/nature13303

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13303 2014

  36. [36]

    G. B. Xavier, G. Lima, Quantum information processing with space-division multiplexing opti- cal fibres, Communications Physics3(2020)9. doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0269-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0269-7 2020

  37. [37]

    N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, N. Gisin, Security of quantum key distribution using d -level systems, Physical Review Letters88(2002)127902. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127902. 16

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.127902 2002

  38. [38]

    Ogrodnik, A

    M. Ogrodnik, A. Widomski, D. Bruß, G. Chesi, F. Grasselli, H. Kampermann, C. Macchiavello, N. Walk, N. Wyderka, M. Karpi ´ nski, High- dimensional quantum key distribution with resource-efficient detection, arXiv:2412.16782 (2024). URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2412. 16782

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    High-dimensional quantum key distribution rates for multiple measurement bases

    N. Wyderka, G. Chesi, H. Kampermann, C. Mac- chiavello, D. Bruß, High-dimensional quantum key distribution rates for multiple measurement bases, arXiv:2501.05890(2025). URL:https://arxiv. org/abs/2501.05890

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Scarfe, R

    L. Scarfe, R. Abolhassani, F. Bouchard, A. Gold- berg, K. Heshami, F. D. Colandrea, E. Karimi, High-dimensional quantum key distribution with qubit-like states, arXiv:2504.03893(2025). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03893

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    T. N. Thomas, W. O. Krawec, New key rate bound for high-dimensional bb84with multiple basis measurements, arXiv:2504.11315(2025). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11315

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Kanitschar, M

    F. Kanitschar, M. Huber, Composable finite-size security of high-dimensional quantum key distri- bution protocols, arXiv:2505.03874(2025). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03874

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    L. A. Correa, Multistage quantum ab- sorption heat pumps, Phys. Rev. E89 (2014)042128. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042128. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042128

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.89.042128 2014

  44. [44]

    J. Wang, Y. Lai, Z. Ye, J. He, Y. Ma, Q. Liao, Four- level refrigerator driven by photons, Phys. Rev. E91(2015)050102. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.050102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.050102

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.91.050102 2015

  45. [45]

    A. C. Santos, B. Çakmak, S. Campbell, N. T. Zinner, Stable adiabatic quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E 100(2019)032107. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032107

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.100.032107 2019

  46. [46]

    Dou, Y.-J

    F.-Q. Dou, Y.-J. Wang, J.-A. Sun, Closed- loop three-level charged quantum battery, EPL (Europhysics Letters)131(2020)43001. URL:https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1209/0295-5075/131/43001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/131/43001

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/131/43001 2020

  47. [47]

    A. Usui, W. Niedenzu, M. Huber, Simpli- fying the design of multilevel thermal ma- chines using virtual qubits, Phys. Rev. A104 (2021)042224. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.042224. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.042224

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.042224 2021

  48. [48]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Sen(De), Dimensional en- hancements in a quantum battery with imperfections, Phys. Rev. A105(2022) 022628. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022628. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022628

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022628 2022

  49. [49]

    T. K. Konar, S. Ghosh, A. K. Pal, A. Sen(De), Designing refrigerators in higher dimensions using quantum spin models, Phys. Rev. A 107(2023)032602. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032602

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032602 2023

  50. [50]

    K. Wei, N. Tischler, S.-R. Zhao, Y.-H. Li, J. M. Ar- razola, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, Y.-A. Chen, B. C. Sanders, Q. Zhang, G. J. Pryde, F. Xu, J.-W. Pan, Experimental quantum switch- ing for exponentially superior quantum commu- nication complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 120504. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.12...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.120504 2019

  51. [51]

    Nagali, D

    E. Nagali, D. Giovannini, L. Marrucci, S. Slus- sarenko, E. Santamato, F. Sciarrino, Experimen- tal optimal cloning of four-dimensional quantum states of photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 073602. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.073602. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.105.073602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.073602 2010

  52. [52]

    Bouchard, R

    F. Bouchard, R. Fickler, R. W. Boyd, E. Karimi, High-dimensional quantum cloning and applica- tions to quantum hacking, Science Advances3 (2017). doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601915

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601915 2017

  53. [53]

    Ecker, F

    S. Ecker, F. Bouchard, L. Bulla, F. Brandt, O. Ko- hout, F. Steinlechner, R. Fickler, M. Malik, Y. Guryanova, R. Ursin, M. Huber, Overcom- ing noise in entanglement distribution, Phys. Rev. X9(2019)041042. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041042. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041042 2019

  54. [54]

    B. P . Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P . Almeida, T. Jen- newein, T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O’Brien, A. Gilchrist, A. G. White, Sim- plifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional hilbert spaces, Nature Physics5(2009)134–140. doi:10.1038/nphys1150

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1150 2009

  55. [55]

    Babazadeh, M

    A. Babazadeh, M. Erhard, F. Wang, M. Malik, R. Nouroozi, M. Krenn, A. Zeilinger, High- dimensional single-photon quantum gates: Con- cepts and experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 180510. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180510. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.119.180510. 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180510 2017

  56. [56]

    Muralidharan, C.-L

    S. Muralidharan, C.-L. Zou, L. Li, J. Wen, L. Jiang, Overcoming erasure errors with multilevel sys- tems, New Journal of Physics19(2017)013026. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa573a

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa573a 2017

  57. [57]

    Bouchard, K

    F. Bouchard, K. Heshami, D. England, R. Fick- ler, R. W. Boyd, B.-G. Englert, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, E. Karimi, Experimental investigation of high- dimensional quantum key distribution protocols with twisted photons, Quantum2(2018)111. doi:10.22331/q-2018-12-04-111

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2018-12-04-111 2018

  58. [58]

    Y. Ding, D. Bacco, K. Dalgaard, X. Cai, X. Zhou, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on multicore fiber using silicon photonic integrated circuits, npj Quantum Information3(2017)25. doi:10.1038/ s41534-017-0026-2

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    A. Sit, R. Fickler, F. Alsaiari, F. Bouchard, H. Larocque, P . Gregg, L. Yan, R. W. Boyd, S. Ra- machandran, E. Karimi, Quantum cryptography with structured photons through a vortex fiber, Optics Letters43(2018)4108. doi:10.1364/OL. 43.004108

    work page doi:10.1364/ol 2018

  60. [60]

    L. V . Amitonova, T. B. H. Tentrup, I. M. Vellekoop, P . W. H. Pinkse, Quantum key establishment via a multimode fiber, Optics Express28(2020)5965. doi:10.1364/OE.380791

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.380791 2020

  61. [61]

    Cañas, N

    G. Cañas, N. Vera, J. Cariñe, P . González, J. Car- denas, P . W. R. Connolly, A. Przysiezna, E. S. Gómez, M. Figueroa, G. Vallone, P . Villoresi, T. F. da Silva, G. B. Xavier, G. Lima, High-dimensional decoy-state quantum key distribution over multi- core telecommunication fibers, Phys. Rev. A96 (2017)022317. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.022317 2017

  62. [62]

    N. T. Islam, C. C. W. Lim, C. Cahall, J. Kim, D. J. Gauthier, Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits, Science Ad- vances3(2017). doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701491

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701491 2017

  63. [63]

    Eusebi, S

    A. Eusebi, S. Mancini, Deterministic quantum dis- tribution of a d-ary key, Quantum Information and Computation9(2009)50–62. doi:10.26421/ QIC9.11-12-3

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    I. D. Ivonovic, Geometrical description of quan- tal state determination, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General14(1981)3241–3245. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/14/12/019

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/14/12/019 1981

  65. [65]

    W. K. Wootters, B. D. Fields, Optimal state- determination by mutually unbiased measure- ments, Annals of Physics191(1989)363–381. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9 1989

  66. [66]

    Bandyopadhyay, P

    S. Bandyopadhyay, P . O. Boykin, V . Roychowdhury, F. Vatan, A new proof for the existence of mutually unbiased bases, Algorithmica34(2002)512–528. doi:10.1007/s00453-002-0980-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00453-002-0980-7 2002

  67. [67]

    G. L. Mullen, A. Poli, H. Stichtenoth (Eds.), Finite Fields and Applications, volume2948, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2004. doi:10.1007/b95905

    work page doi:10.1007/b95905 2004

  68. [68]

    N. J. Beaudry, M. Lucamarini, S. Mancini, R. Renner, Security of two-way quan- tum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A88 (2013)062302. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.062302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.062302

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.062302 2013

  69. [69]

    P . W. Shor, J. Preskill, Simple proof of se- curity of the bb84quantum key distribu- tion protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 441–444. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.441 2000

  70. [70]

    Kraus, N

    B. Kraus, N. Gisin, R. Renner, Lower and upper bounds on the secret-key rate for quan- tum key distribution protocols using one-way classical communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005)080501. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.080501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.080501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.080501 2005

  71. [71]

    Patra, R

    A. Patra, R. Gupta, T. Das, A. Sen(De), Dimen- sional advantage in secure information trading via the noisy dense-coding protocol, Phys. Rev. A110(2024)032419. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.032419. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.032419

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032419 2024

  72. [72]

    Hiroshima, Optimal dense coding with mixed state entanglement, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General34(2001)6907–6912

    T. Hiroshima, Optimal dense coding with mixed state entanglement, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General34(2001)6907–6912. doi:10. 1088/0305-4470/34/35/316

    work page 2001

  73. [74]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estima- tion theory, Journal of Statistical Physics1(1969) 231–252. doi:10.1007/BF01007479

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01007479 1969

  74. [75]

    Holevo, Statistical decision theory for quan- tum systems, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 3(1973)337–394

    A. Holevo, Statistical decision theory for quan- tum systems, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 3(1973)337–394. doi:10.1016/0047-259X(73) 90028-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0047-259x(73 1973

  75. [76]

    S. M. Barnett, S. Croke, Quantum state discrimi- nation, Advances in Optics and Photonics1(2009)

    work page 2009

  76. [77]

    doi:10.1364/AOP.1.000238. 18

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.1.000238

  77. [78]

    Bae, L.-C

    J. Bae, L.-C. Kwek, Quantum state discrimina- tion and its applications, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48(2015)083001. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/8/083001

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/8/083001 2015

  78. [79]

    Ježek, J

    M. Ježek, J. ˇRehᡠcek, J. Fiurášek, Find- ing optimal strategies for minimum-error quantum-state discrimination, Phys. Rev. A 65(2002)060301. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.060301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.060301

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.060301 2002

  79. [80]

    Eldar, A

    Y. Eldar, A. Megretski, G. Verghese, Design- ing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory49(2003)1007–1012. doi:10.1109/TIT. 2003.809510

    work page doi:10.1109/tit 2003

  80. [81]

    Wengang, D

    W. Wengang, D. Guohua, L. Mingshan, Minimum- error quantum state discrimination based on semidefinite programming, in:2008 27th Chi- nese Control Conference, IEEE,2008, pp.521–524. doi:10.1109/CHICC.2008.4605546

    work page doi:10.1109/chicc.2008.4605546 2008

Showing first 80 references.