Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Softness and Hydrodynamic Interactions Regulate Lipoprotein Transport in Crowded Yolk Environments

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Egg-yolk LDLs are caged, soft particles that diffuse roughly 100 times slower when crowded, and the slowdown is 3–7 times stronger than hard-sphere predictions.

desk verdict A genuinely interesting MHz-XPCS measurement of LDL dynamics in native yolk plasma, but the quantitative soft-sphere conclusion rests on an unresolved factor-of-two inconsistency in the concentration scale. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22520 v1 pith:LKBKOUBO submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.soft

Nimmi Das Anthuparambil , Michelle Dargasz , Sonja Timmermann , Anita Girelli , Sebastian Retzbach , Johannes Möller , Wonhyuk Jo , Agha Mohammad Raza
show 22 more authors
Aliaksandr Leonau James Wrigley Frederik Unger Maddalena Bin Prince Prabhu Rajaiah Iason Andronis William Chèvremont Jörg Hallmann Angel Rodriguez-Fernandez Jan-Etienne Pudell Felix Brausse Ulrike Boesenberg Mohamed Youssef Roman Shayduk Rustam Rysov Anders Madsen Felix Lehmkühler Michael Paulus Fajun Zhang Fivos Perakis Frank Schreiber Christian Gutt
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords low-densitylipoproteinseggyolkplasmaX-rayphotoncorrelationspectroscopyanomalousdiffusionhydrodynamicinteractionsparticlesoftnessdynamiccagingself-diffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses megahertz X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy to watch low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) move inside their native crowded egg-yolk plasma. It claims that at physiological concentration crowding slows LDL long-time self-diffusion by roughly a factor of 100 relative to dilute solution, and that this slowdown is 3–7 times stronger than hard-sphere colloidal predictions. The extra damping is attributed to solvent-mediated hydrodynamic interactions together with the inherent softness of LDL particles, and the concentration dependence is reproduced by a concentrated-suspension theory with a soft-sphere interaction parameter and a fitted singular volume fraction of $\phi_0=0.5$. If the claim is right, egg yolk plasma is a dense, sluggish liquid in which soft particles are caged but not frozen, a state that packs lipid storage tightly while still allowing controlled nutrient release during embryonic development.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is dynamic caging, quantified through the relation $D(q)=D_0 H^*(q)/S(q)$, where $S(q)$ is the measured structure factor and $H^*(q)$ is an effective hydrodynamic function whose $q\to\infty$ limit gives the normalized long-time self-diffusion $D_s^{\mathrm{long}}/D_0$. The concentration dependence of that limit is then compared with Eq. 5, which writes $D_s^{\mathrm{long}}/D_0=[1-(9\phi/32)]/[1+L(\phi)+\epsilon K(\phi)]$ with $K(\phi)=(\phi/\phi_0)/(1-\phi/\phi_0)^2$; here $\epsilon$ encodes particle softness ($\epsilon=1$ hard spheres, $\epsilon=2$ for a soft $r^{-6}$ repulsion) and $\phi_0$ is a singular volume fraction set by many-body long-range hydrodynamic interactions. This machinery turns raw XPCS correlation functions into a volume-fraction curve that separates hard-sphere from soft-sphere behavior, and it is complemented by mean-square displacement analysis, which yields cage sizes and the anomalous exponent $\zeta$. The physical picture is that memory effects—from direct interparticle forces and hydrodynamic backflow—stretch the correlation functions and create the sub-diffusive plateau.

What would settle it

Measure long-time self-diffusion of LDLs in yolk plasma after depleting or replacing the livetin fraction while keeping LDL volume fraction fixed: if $D_s^{\mathrm{long}}/D_0$ moves substantially off the $\epsilon=2$ curve of Eq. 5, livetins rather than LDL softness and hydrodynamics are responsible for the extra slowdown, and if it stays on the curve the paper's attribution is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that yolk LDLs behave as soft, hydrodynamically coupled particles rather than hard spheres. In native yolk plasma (volume fraction $\phi\approx 0.43$) the long-time self-diffusion coefficient $D_s^{\mathrm{long}}$ is about one hundredth of the dilute-limit value $D_0$, and the measured $D_s^{\mathrm{long}}/D_0$ falls 3–7 times below hard-sphere predictions, with the gap widening as concentration rises. The authors reproduce the full volume-fraction dependence with Eq. 5 using an inverse-power-law soft repulsion ($\epsilon=2$) and a singular volume fraction $\phi_0=0.5$, whereas the hard-sphere version ($\epsilon=1$) clearly overestimates diffusion. Consistent with caging, the intermediate scattering functions are stretched (KWW exponent $\alpha<1$), the mean-square displacement shows a sub-diffusive plateau, and the reduced memory function grows with concentration. A rescaled hydrodynamic function extracted from the $q$-dependent collective diffusion has the same $q$-shape as the short-time hydrodynamic function, indicating that long-range, solvent-mediated hydrodynamic interactions persist at cage-relaxation times. The authors conclude that yolk plasma remains liquid—the loss modulus exceeds the storage modulus—but is poised near a glass-like state, which they interpret as the physical compromise behind dense lipid storage, structural stability, and fluidity needed for embryogenesis.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the roughly 15 wt% livetins and other yolk-plasma components do not materially alter the measured dynamics; because volume fractions are computed from the 85/15 dry-matter composition, any crowding, depletion, or association from livetins would shift the fitted $\phi_0=0.5$ and the 3–7-fold soft-sphere deviation even if the qualitative 100-fold slowdown survives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At physiological yolk-plasma concentrations, LDL self-diffusion is about 100 times slower than in dilute buffer, so transport models for LDL-based drug carriers should not use dilute diffusion constants in crowded biological fluids.
  • Hard-sphere colloid models systematically overpredict LDL mobility by factors of 3–7 at volume fractions above 0.3, so soft-sphere and hydrodynamic-interaction terms are needed to describe protein and lipoprotein crowding.
  • The ratio of short-time to long-time self-diffusion reaches about 9 at the highest concentration, a sign of strong caging that still leaves the sample in a liquid state, which the authors tie to the structural stability of yolk.
  • Deviations from the Stokes–Einstein relation appear at high concentration, consistent with mass and momentum transport decoupling near a glass-like transition.
  • A hydrodynamic function evaluated at cage timescales retains the $q$-shape of short-time hydrodynamic theory, implying that hydrodynamic interactions remain active in collective relaxation rather than only in the short-time limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If LDL softness is indeed the dominant factor, the same transport picture should apply to other lipid-based nanocarriers in crowded media, so drug-delivery modeling could adopt soft-sphere diffusion laws rather than hard-sphere ones.
  • The fitted $\phi_0=0.5$ and $\epsilon=2$ imply a specific effective repulsive potential; independent osmotic-pressure or pair-force measurements on yolk LDLs could test whether the inferred potential matches direct interaction data.
  • The high compressibility (about 9 times that of hard spheres) but only ~3% SAXS size reduction suggests the apparent softness may come from the deformable lipid core or the apolipoprotein corona rather than from large-scale particle compression, and distinguishing these would refine the mechanism.
  • A straightforward control—depleting livetins while holding LDL volume fraction fixed—would separate the LDL softness contribution from any crowder effects of the minor plasma proteins.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports megahertz XPCS experiments on egg-yolk plasma at three LDL concentrations (reported as 814, 668, and 547 mg/mL). The authors observe concentration-dependent stretching of the intermediate scattering function, a q-dependent collective diffusion coefficient with de Gennes narrowing, a reduced memory function that grows with concentration, and subdiffusive MSD plateaus. From the long-q limit of a rescaled hydrodynamic function they extract Ds_long/D0 and compare it with Tokuyama-type hard-sphere and soft-sphere predictions, concluding that LDLs diffuse 3-7 times slower than hard-sphere predictions, with phi0 = 0.5 and epsilon = 2, and that pure yolk-plasma is a sluggish liquid with Ds_short/Ds_long ~ 9. The biological interpretation is that dense LDL packing balances lipid storage with controlled nutrient release.

Significance. If the quantitative comparison is correct, the paper is significant for biological crowding and LDL-based drug delivery: it directly resolves microsecond cage dynamics in a native, highly concentrated biological fluid and identifies softness and many-body hydrodynamic interactions as causes of the slowdown beyond hard-sphere expectations. The XPCS methodology is careful: dose-rate and accumulated-dose thresholds are established (Figs. S15-S16), speckle contrast is calibrated (Fig. S6), and the raw correlation data are independent of the theoretical model. The qualitative finding of strong caging and a roughly 100-fold reduction of long-time self-diffusion at physiological concentration is credible and would survive even if the quantitative comparison to soft-sphere theory is revised. However, the central quantitative claims are currently tied to an unresolved concentration-scale inconsistency and to a one-parameter fit of phi0 to the same data being compared.

major comments (4)
  1. [Materials and Methods, Sample preparation; Results; Table 1] There is an internal factor-of-two inconsistency in the reported LDL concentrations. The Methods state that yolk-plasma dry matter is 49 wt% and LDLs are 85 wt% of that dry matter; with LDL density 0.98 g/cm3 this gives 0.49 x 0.85 = 0.4165 g/g, i.e. about 417 mg/mL, and the 90 wt% and 80 wt% dilutions give about 375 and 333 mg/mL. The volume fractions in Table 1 (0.43, 0.39, 0.34) match this mass-fraction calculation, but the concentrations quoted in the Results and Methods are 814, 668, and 547 mg/mL, which cannot be reconciled with the stated dry-matter content or with the stated dilution factors. Since phi is the x-axis of Fig. 5B and enters Eq. 5, the hard-sphere reference curve, the fitted phi0 = 0.5, and the central '3-7 times slower than hard-spheres' claim are not robust until this concentration scale is settled.
  2. [Discussion, Eq. 5, Fig. 5B] The quantitative soft-sphere comparison is weaker than the text implies because the red curve in Fig. 5B uses phi0 = 0.5 obtained by fitting the very same three Ds_long/D0 values it is compared with; three points with one free parameter do not constitute an independent confirmation of the model. Moreover, Fig. 5B shows no error bars for Ds_long/D0 even though these values are obtained by taking the q -> infinity limit of H*(q), after rescaling by Ds_long/Ds_short from the MSD fit. The manuscript should report uncertainties (e.g., from fit covariance or bootstrap over the H*(q) extrapolation) and a sensitivity analysis for phi0 before the 3-7x deviation from hard-sphere behavior can be assessed.
  3. [Discussion, Eq. 7; Fig. S11] The MSD analysis used to support caging and to define cage sizes partly re-uses the model output: Eq. 7 multiplies the measured width function w(q,t) by Ds_long/D(q), where Ds_long is itself taken from the H* model (Eq. 4) whose long-q limit is the quantity plotted in Fig. 5B. The collapse across q in Fig. S11 shows internal consistency, but the absolute MSD scale and the extracted cage sizes in Table 1 are not direct experimental observables. Please state explicitly which reported quantities (Ds_long/D0, MSD, rcage, viscoelastic moduli) depend on this model step, and ideally provide an estimate of the associated systematic uncertainty.
  4. [Results, opening paragraph; Materials and Methods, Sample preparation] The model and volume-fraction calculation treat yolk-plasma as essentially monodisperse LDLs, but the sample contains about 15 wt% livetins and other plasma components. These proteins are absent from the phi calculation and from the Tokuyama model. If livetins crowd, deplete, or associate with LDLs, the effective volume fraction and hydrodynamic interactions differ from those assumed, and part of the apparent deviation from hard-sphere behavior could be misattributed to LDL softness. This should be acknowledged as a limitation or tested, for example by comparing with livetin-depleted plasma or model LDL/livetin mixtures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5B caption; Discussion] The solid black curve in Fig. 5B is labeled as Eq. 14, but Eq. 14 is the short-time self-diffusion coefficient Ds_short/D0, whereas the data plotted are Ds_long/D0; the caption and text should explain why this short-time curve is shown on the same panel.
  2. [Materials and Methods, Estimation of D0] Eq. 11 uses R = 15.5 nm obtained from SAXS form-factor fits, not from a hydrodynamic measurement; the main text should state this explicitly, since D0 normalizes all diffusion coefficients and the SAXS radius may differ from the hydrodynamic radius used in the Stokes-Einstein estimate.
  3. [Results, Wave-vector dependent dynamics] The KWW exponent range is given as 0.5-0.8, but no table or figure reports the actual fitted alpha values for each q and concentration; adding this information would make the stretching claim more quantitative.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract states 'approximately 100 times slower than in dilute solutions' without specifying that this is for pure yolk-plasma and is based on the H* extrapolation; consider adding a qualifier such as 'estimated' to avoid overstating a model-dependent number.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The soft-sphere curve in Fig. 5B is fitted to the same Ds_long/D0 points it is said to confirm, but the core XPCS-based caging and 3-7x hard-sphere-deviation claims are independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Discussion, Fig. 5B paragraph; Eq. 5]
    "The prediction of 𝐷long𝑠/𝐷0 for this model, assuming hard-sphere interactions only (dotted line in Fig. 5B), overestimates the diffusion constants also by a factor of 3–7. In contrast, 𝐷long𝑠/𝐷0 for soft-spheres aligns with the data (red line in Fig. 5B), highlighting the critical role of particle softness in limiting the self-diffusion coefficients of LDL particles in egg yolk-plasma. Furthermore, the critical volume fraction obtained from the fit is 𝜙0= 0.5."

    Equation 5 contains phi0 as a free singular-volume parameter, and the red soft-sphere curve in Fig. 5B is Eq. 5 with eps=2 and phi0=0.5. The paper explicitly says phi0=0.5 was 'obtained from the fit', i.e. fitted to the very three Ds_long/D0 points displayed in Fig. 5B. Presenting this curve as 'aligns with the data' is therefore not an independent test of the soft-sphere/hydrodynamic explanation; it is a one-parameter fit to the same data being explained. The non-circular part is the hard-sphere comparison with phi0=0.5718 fixed externally, which yields the independent 3-7x overestimate; the additional attribution to softness via eps=2 rests on the fitted curve.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is self-contained and independent of the model fit: XPCS two-time correlations fitted with Eq. 2 give Gamma(q), D(q)=Gamma/q^2, and H*(q)=D(q)S(q)/D0; the high-q limit of H*(q) yields Ds_long/D0; and the comparison with the Tokuyama hard-sphere curve (Eq. 5, eps=1, phi0=0.5718 fixed) is an external benchmark that supports the headline 100-fold slowdown and 3-7x hard-sphere deviation. These claims do not reduce to fitted inputs. The circular element is limited to the soft-sphere red curve in Fig. 5B, whose phi0=0.5 is fitted to the same Ds_long/D0 values the curve is then said to confirm; this is a fitted-curve agreement rather than an independent prediction. Self-citations (e.g., ref. 35 for ferritin scaling) are contextual and not load-bearing. Separately, the reported LDL concentrations 814/668/547 mg/mL are roughly twice the 0.49 x 0.85 = 0.417 g/mL implied by the stated 49 wt% dry matter and 85 wt% LDL composition, while Table 1 volume fractions 0.43/0.39/0.34 match the mass-fraction calculation rather than the reported mg/mL values; this is a data-consistency/correctness concern for the Fig. 5B x-axis, but it is not a circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new microscopic entities are introduced. The central claim depends on external colloid models (Tokuyama-Oppenheim, Beenakker-Mazur), on fitted parameters phi0 and nu, and on treating the multicomponent plasma as a one-component LDL suspension.

free parameters (3)
  • phi0 (critical volume fraction in Tokuyama model, Eq. 5) = 0.5
    Fitted to the three experimental Ds_long/D0 values in Fig. 5B; the soft-sphere curve said to align with the data is drawn with this fitted value, so the agreement is not a parameter-free prediction.
  • nu (free parameter in MSD model, Eq. 15) = not reported
    Explicitly described as a free parameter to be determined; it enters the extraction of Ds_short/Ds_long and cage sizes, but fitted values are not reported.
  • Effective LDL radius at high concentration (form factor fits, Fig. S3B-D) = roughly 3% smaller than 15.5 nm at 814 mg/ml
    Obtained from fits to I(q) at q>0.65 nm^-1 and used to set D0, normalize volume fractions, and compute hard-sphere comparisons; errors propagate into Ds/D0.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Stokes-Einstein relation with water viscosity and LDL radius R=15.5 nm yields the dilute diffusion coefficient D0.
    Used in Eq. 11 and throughout to normalize all diffusion coefficients.
  • domain assumption The measured I(q) can be factored into an effective form factor and structure factor using Eq. 9, with the high-concentration form factor obtained by fitting q>0.65 nm^-1.
    If the LDL shape changes more than the fitted 3% size reduction at high concentration, the extracted S(q), S(0), and compressibility are biased.
  • domain assumption Yolk-plasma dry matter is 85 wt% LDL and 15 wt% livetins, and the LDL density is 0.98 g/cm3, so concentration can be converted to volume fraction.
    Volume fractions in Table 1 and all hard-sphere comparisons rest on this composition and density from the literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The Tokuyama-Oppenheim model with epsilon=2 (soft inverse-power-law potential) and the fitted phi0=0.5 describes the long-time self-diffusion of LDLs.
    The softer-sphere exponent is assumed rather than measured, and phi0 is fitted to the data, making the model comparison partly post hoc.
  • domain assumption The empirical MSD relation Eq. 7, validated for hard-sphere colloids, applies to soft LDLs in yolk plasma.
    Used to convert collective intermediate scattering functions into mean-square displacements; the paper supports it with a collapse of curves but no independent check.
  • domain assumption The 15 wt% livetins and other yolk constituents do not materially affect the measured dynamics.
    The analysis treats the plasma as LDL-only; livetin crowding, depletion, or binding are not modeled. This is the weakest assumption and is not flagged in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Softness and Hydrodynamic Interactions Regulate Lipoprotein Transport in Crowded Yolk Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LKBKOUBO

@misc{pith2026250522520,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Softness and Hydrodynamic Interactions Regulate Lipoprotein Transport in Crowded Yolk Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LKBKOUBO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22520}
}
abstract

Low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) serve as nutrient reservoirs in egg yolk for embryonic development and as promising drug carriers. Both roles critically depend on their mobility in densely crowded biological environments. Under these crowded conditions, diffusion is hindered by transient confinement within dynamic cages formed by neighboring particles, driven by solvent-mediated hydrodynamic interactions and memory effects -- phenomena that have remained challenging to characterize computationally and experimentally. Here, we employ megahertz X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy to directly probe the cage dynamics of LDLs in yolk-plasma across various concentrations. We find that LDLs undergo anomalous diffusion, experiencing $\approx$ 100-fold reduction in self-diffusion at high concentrations compared to dilute solutions. This drastic slowing-down is attributed to a combination of hydrodynamic interactions, direct particle-particle interactions, and the inherent softness of LDL particles. Despite reduced dynamics, yolk-plasma remains as a liquid, yet sluggish, balancing dense packing, structural stability, and fluidity essential for controlled lipid release during embryogenesis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Depletion-Induced Interactions Modulate Nanoscale Protein Diffusion in Polymeric Crowder Solutions

    cond-mat.soft 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ferritin diffusion in polymer crowder solutions follows a c*-normalized non-monotonic curve with a crossover near 2c*, attributed to depletion-induced intermediate-range order that bulk viscosity cannot explain.

  2. A pipeline for Megahertz X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy on soft matter samples at the MID instrument of European XFEL

    physics.ins-det 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An automated pipeline for MHz-XPCS at the MID instrument of the European XFEL enables routine microsecond-timescale dynamics measurements on soft matter with minimal user intervention.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. W. Gofman, et al., The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis.Science 111 (2877), 166–186 (1950)

    1950

  2. [2]

    Saari, W

    A. Saari, W. Powrie, O. Fennema, Isolation and characterization of low-density lipoproteins in native egg yolk plasma. J. Food Sci. 29 (3), 307–315 (1964)

    1964

  3. [3]

    T. Li, Y. Jin, J. Wu, Z. Ren, Beyond energy provider: multifunction of lipid droplets in embryonic development. Biol. Res. 56 (1), 38 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    B. A. Ference, E. Braunwald, A. L. Catapano, The LDL cumulative exposure hypothesis: evidence and practical applications. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 21 (10), 701–716 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    H. J. Carpenter, M. H. Ghayesh, A. C. Zander, P. J. Psaltis, Effect of Nonlinear Blood Viscosity on LDL Transport and Fluid-Structure Interaction Biomechanics of a Multi-stenosis Left Circumflex Coronary Artery, in Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics: Proceedings of the Second International Nonlinear Dynamics Conference (NODYCON 2021), Volume 1(Springer) (2022...

    2022

  6. [6]

    C. Zhu, Y. Xia, Biomimetics: reconstitution of low-density lipoprotein for targeted drug delivery and related theranostic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (24), 7668–7682 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Wang, et al

    C. Wang, et al. , Transporting mitochondrion-targeting photosensitizers into cancer cells by low-density lipoproteins for fluorescence-feedback photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale 13 (2), 1195–1205 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Jutkova, D

    A. Jutkova, D. Chorvat, P. Miskovsky, D. Jancura, S. Datta, Encapsulation of anticancer drug curcumin and co-loading with photosensitizer hypericin into lipoproteins investigated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Int. J. Pharm. 564, 369–378 (2019)

    2019

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Dai, et al

    L. Dai, et al. , Low-density lipoprotein: a versatile nanoscale platform for targeted delivery. Nanoscale Adv. 5 (4), 1011–1022 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Sun, B.-Q

    Y.-L. Sun, B.-Q. Ge, M.-Z. Li, L. Wang, Z.-X. Chen, The effect of macromolecular crowding degree on the self-assembly of fatty acid and lipid hydrolysis. npj Sci. Food. 7 (1), 39 (2023). 26

    2023

  3. [11]

    Nettesheim, et al., Macromolecular crowding acts as a physical regulator of intracellular transport

    G. Nettesheim, et al., Macromolecular crowding acts as a physical regulator of intracellular transport. Nat. Phys. 16 (11), 1144–1151 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Alric, C

    B. Alric, C. Formosa-Dague, E. Dague, L. J. Holt, M. Delarue, Macromolecular crowding limits growth under pressure. Nat. Phys. 18 (4), 411–416 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Grimaldo, F

    M. Grimaldo, F. Roosen-Runge, F. Zhang, F. Schreiber, T. Seydel, Dynamics of proteins in solution. Q. Rev. Biophys. 52, e7 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Girelli, et al., Microscopic dynamics of liquid-liquid phase separation and domain coars- ening in a protein solution revealed by X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy.Phys

    A. Girelli, et al., Microscopic dynamics of liquid-liquid phase separation and domain coars- ening in a protein solution revealed by X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (13), 138004 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    N. D. Anthuparambil, et al., Salt induced slowdown of kinetics and dynamics during thermal gelation of egg-yolk. J. Chem. Phys. 161 (5) (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Ramalingam, G

    R. Ramalingam, G. Jiang, H. Larjava, L. H¨akkinen, Macromolecular crowding regulates matrix composition and gene expression in human gingival fibroblast cultures. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 2047 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Bucciarelli, et al., Dramatic influence of patchy attractions on short-time protein diffusion under crowded conditions

    S. Bucciarelli, et al., Dramatic influence of patchy attractions on short-time protein diffusion under crowded conditions. Sci. Adv. 2 (12), e1601432 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Nawrocki, P.-h

    G. Nawrocki, P.-h. Wang, I. Yu, Y. Sugita, M. Feig, Slow-down in diffusion in crowded protein solutions correlates with transient cluster formation. J. Phys. Chem. B 121 (49), 11072–11084 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    M. K. Braun, et al., Crowding-controlled cluster size in concentrated aqueous protein solutions: structure, self-and collective diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 (12), 2590–2596 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Lavalette, C

    D. Lavalette, C. T ´etreau, M. Tourbez, Y. Blouquit, Microscopic viscosity and rotational diffu- sion of proteins in a macromolecular environment. Biophys. J. 76 (5), 2744–2751 (1999)

    1999

  13. [21]

    Zosel, A

    F. Zosel, A. Soranno, K. J. Buholzer, D. Nettels, B. Schuler, Depletion interactions modulate the binding between disordered proteins in crowded environments.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (24), 13480–13489 (2020). 27

    2020

  14. [22]

    Heinen, et al., Viscosity and diffusion: crowding and salt effects in protein solutions

    M. Heinen, et al., Viscosity and diffusion: crowding and salt effects in protein solutions. Soft Matter 8 (5), 1404–1419 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Grimaldo, et al., Protein short-time diffusion in a naturally crowded environment

    M. Grimaldo, et al., Protein short-time diffusion in a naturally crowded environment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 (8), 1709–1715 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Beck, et al., Short-time transport properties of bidisperse suspensions of immunoglobulins and serum albumins consistent with a colloid physics picture

    C. Beck, et al., Short-time transport properties of bidisperse suspensions of immunoglobulins and serum albumins consistent with a colloid physics picture. J. Phys. Chem. B. 126 (38), 7400–7408 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    D. Bonn, W. K. Kegel, Stokes–Einstein relations and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem in a supercooled colloidal fluid. J. Chem. Phys. 118 (4), 2005–2009 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    S. F. Swallen, M. Ediger, Self-diffusion of the amorphous pharmaceutical indomethacin near T g. Soft Matter 7 (21), 10339–10344 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Klein, W

    R. Klein, W. Hess, Mass-diffusion and self-diffusion properties in systems of strongly charged spherical particles. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 76, 137–150 (1983)

    1983

  20. [28]

    N ¨agele, P

    G. N ¨agele, P. Baur, R. Klein, Non-exponential relaxation of density fluctuations in strongly interacting colloidal suspensions. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 231 (1), 49–61 (1996), colloid and Interface Science: Trends and Applications

    1996

  21. [29]

    P. Baur, G. N ¨agele, R. Klein, Nonexponential relaxation of density fluctuations in charge- stabilized colloids. Phys. Rev. E 53, 6224–6237 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    E. R. Weeks, D. A. Weitz, Subdiffusion and the cage effect studied near the colloidal glass transition. Chem. Phys. 284 (1-2), 361–367 (2002)

    2002

  23. [31]

    E. R. Weeks, D. Weitz, Properties of cage rearrangements observed near the colloidal glass transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (9), 095704 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    N ¨agele, On the dynamics and structure of charge-stabilized suspensions.Phys

    G. N ¨agele, On the dynamics and structure of charge-stabilized suspensions.Phys. Rep. 272 (5- 6), 215–372 (1996)

    1996

  25. [33]

    Doster, S

    W. Doster, S. Longeville, Microscopic diffusion and hydrodynamic interactions of hemoglobin in red blood cells. Biophys. J. 93 (4), 1360–1368 (2007). 28

    2007

  26. [34]

    Roosen-Runge, et al

    F. Roosen-Runge, et al. , Protein self-diffusion in crowded solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 (29), 11815–11820 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Girelli, et al

    A. Girelli, et al. , Coherent X-rays reveal anomalous molecular diffusion and cage effects in crowded protein solutions. arXiv:2410.08873 [cond-mat.soft] (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    T. Ando, E. Chow, J. Skolnick, Dynamic simulation of concentrated macromolecular solutions with screened long-range hydrodynamic interactions: Algorithm and limitations. J. Chem. Phys. 139 (12) (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    J. F. Brady, G. Bossis, et al., Stokesian dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 111–157 (1988)

    1988

  30. [38]

    Holmqvist, G

    P. Holmqvist, G. N¨agele, Long-time dynamics of concentrated charge-stabilized colloids.Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (5), 058301 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    Tokuyama, I

    M. Tokuyama, I. Oppenheim, Dynamics of hard-sphere suspensions.Phys. Rev. E50, R16–R19 (1994)

    1994

  32. [40]

    Tokuyama, I

    M. Tokuyama, I. Oppenheim, On the theory of concentrated hard-sphere suspensions. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 216 (1-2), 85–119 (1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    Foffi, et al., Hard sphere-like glass transition in eye lens𝛼-crystallin solutions

    G. Foffi, et al., Hard sphere-like glass transition in eye lens𝛼-crystallin solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (47), 16748–16753 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Vodnala, et al., Hard-sphere-like dynamics in highly concentrated alpha-crystallin suspen- sions

    P. Vodnala, et al., Hard-sphere-like dynamics in highly concentrated alpha-crystallin suspen- sions. Phys. Rev. E 97 (2), 020601 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Stradner, P

    A. Stradner, P. Schurtenberger, Potential and limits of a colloid approach to protein solutions. Soft Matter 16 (2), 307–323 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Balbo, P

    J. Balbo, P. Mereghetti, D.-P. Herten, R. C. Wade, The shape of protein crowders is a major determinant of protein diffusion. Biophys. J. 104 (7), 1576–1584 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Tokuyama, T

    M. Tokuyama, T. Moriki, Y. Kimura, Self-diffusion of biomolecules in solution. Phys. Rev. E 83 (5), 051402 (2011). 29

    2011

  38. [46]

    Madsen, et al., Materials Imaging and Dynamics (MID) instrument at the European X-ray Free-Electron Laser Facility

    A. Madsen, et al., Materials Imaging and Dynamics (MID) instrument at the European X-ray Free-Electron Laser Facility. J. Synchrotron Rad. 28 (2), 637–649 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Srinivasan, V

    H. Srinivasan, V. K. Sharma, S. Mitra, Breaking the Brownian barrier: models and manifesta- tions of molecular diffusion in complex fluids.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26 (47), 29227–29250 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Anton, Egg yolk: structures, functionalities and processes

    M. Anton, Egg yolk: structures, functionalities and processes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93 (12), 2871–2880 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Kuang, F

    H. Kuang, F. Yang, Y. Zhang, T. Wang, G. Chen, The impact of egg nutrient composition and its consumption on cholesterol homeostasis. Cholesterol 2018 (1), 6303810 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Breßler, J

    I. Breßler, J. Kohlbrecher, A. F. Th¨ unemann, SASfit: a tool for small-angle scattering data analysis using a library of analytical expressions. J. Appl. Cryst. 48 (5), 1587–1598 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    S. D. Quinn, et al., Crowding-induced morphological changes in synthetic lipid vesicles deter- mined using smFRET. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 958026 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    OGINO, T

    K. OGINO, T. KUBOTA, H. UCHIYAMA, M. ABE, Micelle formation and micellar size by a light scattering technique. J. oleo sci. 37 (8), 588–591 (1988)

    1988

  45. [53]

    Perakis, C

    F. Perakis, C. Gutt, Towards molecular movies with X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (35), 19443–19453 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    N. D. Anthuparambil, et al., Exploring non-equilibrium processes and spatio-temporal scaling laws in heated egg yolk using coherent X-rays.Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 5580 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Williams, D

    G. Williams, D. C. Watts, Non-symmetrical dielectric relaxation behaviour arising from a simple empirical decay function. Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 80–85 (1970)

    1970

  48. [56]

    simple-liquid

    A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, Characterization of the “simple-liquid” state in a polymeric system: Coherent and incoherent scattering functions. Phys. Rev. E 80 (4), 041805 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    Ruta, et al., Wave-vector dependence of the dynamics in supercooled metallic liquids.Phys

    B. Ruta, et al., Wave-vector dependence of the dynamics in supercooled metallic liquids.Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (5), 055701 (2020). 30

    2020

  50. [58]

    L. Hong, N. Smolin, J. C. Smith, de Gennes narrowing describes the relative motion of protein domains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (15), 158102 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Nyg ˚ard, et al., Anisotropic de Gennes narrowing in confined fluids.Phys

    K. Nyg ˚ard, et al., Anisotropic de Gennes narrowing in confined fluids.Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (16), 167801 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Caronna, Y

    C. Caronna, Y. Chushkin, A. Madsen, A. Cupane, Dynamics of nanoparticles in a supercooled liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (5), 055702 (2008)

    2008

  53. [61]

    Neuber, et al

    N. Neuber, et al. , Disentangling structural and kinetic components of the 𝛼-relaxation in supercooled metallic liquids. Commun. Phys. 5 (1), 316 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Luo, et al., Q-dependent collective relaxation dynamics of glass-forming liquid Ca0

    P. Luo, et al., Q-dependent collective relaxation dynamics of glass-forming liquid Ca0. 4K0. 6 (NO3) 1.4 investigated by wide-angle neutron spin-echo.Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 2092 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    T. W. Taylor, B. J. Ackerson, Memory function for a colloidal liquid. J. Chem. Phys. 83 (5), 2441–2446 (1985)

    1985

  56. [64]

    H ¨artl, H

    W. H ¨artl, H. Versmold, U. Wittig, P. Linse, Structure and dynamics of polymer colloid sus- pensions from dynamic light scattering and Brownian dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 97 (10), 7797–7804 (1992)

    1992

  57. [65]

    W. Hess, R. Klein, Generalized hydrodynamics of systems of Brownian particles. Adv. Phys. 32 (2), 173–283 (1983)

    1983

  58. [66]

    Dallari, et al., Microsecond hydrodynamic interactions in dense colloidal dispersions probed at the European XFEL

    F. Dallari, et al., Microsecond hydrodynamic interactions in dense colloidal dispersions probed at the European XFEL. IUCrJ 8 (5), 775–783 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    J. D. Maier, J. Wagner, Structure and short-time diffusion of concentrated suspensions consist- ing of silicone-stabilised PMMA particles: a quantitative analysis taking polydispersity effects into account. Soft Matter 20 (6), 1309–1319 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    G. C. Abade, B. Cichocki, M. L. Ekiel-Je˙ zewska, G. N¨agele, E. Wajnryb, Short-time dynamics of permeable particles in concentrated suspensions. J. Chem. Phys. 132 (1) (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Beenakker, P

    C. Beenakker, P. Mazur, Diffusion of spheres in a concentrated suspension: Resummation of many-body hydrodynamic interactions. Phys. Lett. A 98 (1-2), 22–24 (1983). 31

    1983

  62. [70]

    Beenakker, P

    C. Beenakker, P. Mazur, Diffusion of spheres in a concentrated suspension II. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 126 (3), 349–370 (1984)

    1984

  63. [71]

    Medina-Noyola, Long-time self-diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions

    M. Medina-Noyola, Long-time self-diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (26), 2705 (1988)

    1988

  64. [72]

    Van Blaaderen, J

    A. Van Blaaderen, J. Peetermans, G. Maret, J. Dhont, Long-time self-diffusion of spherical colloidal particles measured with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. J. Chem. Phys. 96 (6), 4591–4603 (1992)

    1992

  65. [73]

    Begam, et al., Packing and dynamics of a protein solution approaching the jammed state

    N. Begam, et al., Packing and dynamics of a protein solution approaching the jammed state. Soft Matter 16 (33), 7751–7759 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    M. J. Bergman, T. Garting, P. Schurtenberger, A. Stradner, Experimental evidence for a cluster glass transition in concentrated lysozyme solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 123 (10), 2432–2438 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    A. J. Banchio, M. Heinen, P. Holmqvist, G. N¨agele, Short-and long-time diffusion and dynamic scaling in suspensions of charged colloidal particles. J. Chem. Phys. 148 (13) (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    Martinez, J

    V. Martinez, J. Thijssen, F. Zontone, W. Van Megen, G. Bryant, Dynamics of hard sphere sus- pensions using dynamic light scattering and X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy: Dynamics and scaling of the intermediate scattering function. J. Chem. Phys. 134 (5) (2011)

    2011

  69. [77]

    Segre, P

    P. Segre, P. Pusey, Scaling of the dynamic scattering function of concentrated colloidal sus- pensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (4), 771 (1996)

    1996

  70. [78]

    Segre, P

    P. Segre, P. N. Pusey, Dynamics and scaling in hard-sphere colloidal suspensions. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 235 (1-2), 9–18 (1997)

    1997

  71. [79]

    L ¨owen, T

    H. L ¨owen, T. Palberg, R. Simon, Dynamical criterion for freezing of colloidal liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (10), 1557 (1993)

    1993

  72. [80]

    T. G. Mason, Estimating the viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids using the generalized Stokes–Einstein equation. Rheol. Acta. 39, 371–378 (2000). 32

    2000

  73. [81]

    U. Genz, R. Klein, Collective diffusion of charged spheres in the presence of hydrodynamic interaction. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 171 (1), 26–42 (1991)

    1991

  74. [82]

    Biehl, Jscatter, a program for evaluation and analysis of experimental data.PLoS One 14 (6), e0218789 (2019)

    R. Biehl, Jscatter, a program for evaluation and analysis of experimental data.PLoS One 14 (6), e0218789 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Tokuyama, Slow dynamics of equilibrium density fluctuations in a supercooled colloidal liquid

    M. Tokuyama, Slow dynamics of equilibrium density fluctuations in a supercooled colloidal liquid. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 289 (1-2), 57–85 (2001)

    2001

  76. [84]

    Tokuyama, H

    M. Tokuyama, H. Yamazaki, Y. Terada, Test of mean-field equations for two types of hard- sphere systems by a Brownian-dynamics simulation and a molecular-dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. E 67 (6), 062403 (2003)

    2003

  77. [85]

    Reiser, et al

    M. Reiser, et al. , Resolving molecular diffusion and aggregation of antibody proteins with megahertz X-ray free-electron laser pulses. Nat. Commun. 13, 2041–1723 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    K. Mann, M. Mann, The chicken egg yolk plasma and granule proteomes. Proteomics 8 (1), 178–191 (2008)

    2008

  79. [87]

    Cao, et al., The protein corona leads to deformation of spherical micelles

    C. Cao, et al., The protein corona leads to deformation of spherical micelles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 133 (18), 10430–10437 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Hruszkewycz, et al

    S. Hruszkewycz, et al. , High contrast x-ray speckle from atomic-scale order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (18), 185502 (2012)

    2012

  81. [89]

    N ¨agele, P

    G. N ¨agele, P. Baur, Long-time dynamics of charged colloidal suspensions: hydrodynamic interaction effects. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 245 (3), 297–336 (1997)

    1997

  82. [90]

    Ruta, et al., Hard X-rays as pump and probe of atomic motion in oxide glasses

    B. Ruta, et al., Hard X-rays as pump and probe of atomic motion in oxide glasses. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 1–8 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Pintori, G

    G. Pintori, G. Baldi, B. Ruta, G. Monaco, Relaxation dynamics induced in glasses by absorption of hard X-ray photons. Phys. Rev. B 99 (22), 224206 (2019)

    2019

  84. [92]

    M ¨oller, M

    J. M ¨oller, M. Sprung, A. Madsen, C. Gutt, X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy of protein dynamics at nearly diffraction-limited storage rings. IUCrJ 6 (5), 794–803 (2019). 33

    2019

  85. [93]

    Dallari, et al., Real-time swelling-collapse kinetics of nanogels driven by XFEL pulses.Sci

    F. Dallari, et al., Real-time swelling-collapse kinetics of nanogels driven by XFEL pulses.Sci. Adv. 10 (16), eadm7876 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Abbasnezhad, N

    B. Abbasnezhad, N. Hamdami, J.-Y. Monteau, H. Vatankhah, Numerical modeling of heat transfer and pasteurizing value during thermal processing of intact egg. Food Sci. Nutr. 4 (1), 42–49 (2016)

    2016

  87. [95]

    S. S. Rita de C ´assia, et al., Effect of pH and salt concentration on the solubility and density of egg yolk and plasma egg yolk. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. 40 (7), 1253–1258 (2007). Acknowledgments We acknowledge European XFEL in Schenefeld, Germany, for the provision of X-ray...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.