pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.22883 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Spectrally Resolved Higher Order Photon Statistics of Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 12:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords spontaneous parametric down-conversionphoton statisticsnegative binomial distributionHanbury Brown and Twiss interferometerthermal lightwavelength dependenceheralded detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

The photon statistics of spontaneous parametric down-conversion follow a negative binomial distribution like thermal light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how the number of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion varies with wavelength and pump power. Using a spectrometer and a four-detector setup that heralds the signal beam with its paired idler photon, the authors record higher-order coincidence counts. These counts fit a negative binomial distribution across the measured spectral bands, which is the expected form for thermal light. The average photon number rises asymmetrically around the degenerate wavelength, with shorter wavelengths showing stronger nonlinear growth than longer ones. Such wavelength-resolved statistics matter for applications that need controlled photon sources in quantum metrology or communications.

Core claim

The photon statistics of SPDC, measured with a four-detector Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometer that uses the idler as herald, are best described by a Negative Binomial Distribution. Average photon numbers increase asymmetrically with pump power around the degenerate wavelength; shorter wavelengths within the emission band rise nonlinearly while longer wavelengths rise more linearly, revealing a wavelength-dependent generation efficiency.

What carries the argument

Four-detector Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometer with idler heralding, coupled to a spectrometer for spectral resolution of the signal beam.

If this is right

  • SPDC sources exhibit thermal-light photon statistics that remain consistent when resolved by wavelength.
  • Photon-number growth with pump power is stronger and more nonlinear at shorter wavelengths than at longer wavelengths.
  • Heralded multi-detector measurements can characterize complex light sources for quantum applications that depend on photon-number distributions.
  • Spectral filtering or selection within the SPDC band can tune the effective brightness and statistics of the output light.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed asymmetry may stem from the phase-matching bandwidth of the nonlinear crystal, which could be tested by varying crystal temperature or angle.
  • If the negative-binomial form persists at higher pump powers, it would support using SPDC as a calibrated thermal source for quantum metrology protocols.
  • Extending the same spectrometer-coupled setup to measure higher-order moments could reveal whether the thermal character holds for multi-photon coincidences beyond second order.

Load-bearing premise

The four-detector coincidence scheme with the idler as herald accurately captures the true photon-number distribution of the signal without significant losses, dark counts, or spectral filtering bias that would distort the observed statistics.

What would settle it

A repeated experiment that measures Poissonian statistics instead of negative binomial statistics after reducing detector losses and dark counts to negligible levels would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22883 by Chiran Wijesundara, Jeffrey Carvalho, Tim Thomay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup for measuring the photon statistics of SPDC coming from the β-BBO crystal. The time dynamics are investigated by synchronizing the APD events with the excitation laser in Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) fashion via an FPGA based correlation board. The spectral dependence is studied by the use of the spectrometer before the HBT where the grating can be used to select what w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectrally resolved photon statistics for the ten measurements using the highest average pump power (≈ 39 mW) and lowest coincidence window (0.165 ns). The x axis represents photon number n and the y axis represents probability, while the colors of the bars indicate the central wavelength of the grating in the spectrometer before the HBT setup in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fitting results for the central grating wavelength of 787 nm with the highest average pump power. On the x axis is photon number detection n and probability is on the y axis. The four plots represent four of the coincidence windows used. From left to right the coincidence values are 0.165, 0.329, 0.494, and 0.658 ns. The gray bars represent the normalized experimental data, the red stars is the Poissonian … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average photon number power dependence for five of the ten measured wavelengths. The x axis represents the pump power and the y axis represents the average photon number extracted from the Negative Binomial fit. Spectral dependence is also shown by the color in the legend. A nonlinear relationship is shown at the shorter wavelengths, where the conversion efficiency is higher. The maximum intensity waveleng… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time dependence of the average photon number ⟨n⟩ for five out of the ten measured wavelengths. The x axis represents the coincidence window and the y axis represents the average photon number. The time dependence is studied by varying the coincidence window ∆τ to correlate photon arrival times. A steady relative increase is shown for ∆τ < 0.494 ns, and a saturation effect is shown between 0.494 ns and 0.65… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: However, the difference in overall slope based on wavelength is noticeable, where the shorter wavelengths λ < 800 nm show more rapid increase in average photon number as the ∆τ increases. This can be explained by the fact that at the lower wavelengths, as shown previously, the efficiency of generation is higher, leading to more detected events overall. When increasing the coincidence window, there is a mor… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The photon statistics of Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion (SPDC) exhibit dependencies on wavelength, pump power, and coincidence time. Notably, the average photon numbers were found to asymmetrically increase with increasing pump power around the degenerate wavelength of emission. By the coupling of the detection scheme to a spectrometer, studying different bandwidths within the emission revealed that shorter wavelengths increased nonlinearly with pump power, while longer wavelengths showed more linear behavior, indicating a wavelength dependent efficiency in the generation of the SPDC. We employ the use of a four detector Hanbury Brown and Twiss Interferometer to study the photon statistics of the signal beam, where the idler serves as the herald. The measured statistics were found to be best described by a Negative Binomial Distribution, which is a characteristic of thermal light sources. The detection and characterization of complex light sources has wide ranging applications in the fields of quantum metrology, quantum communications, and quantum computing, more specifically, a system that is sensitive to wavelength and photon number distribution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements of spectrally resolved higher-order photon statistics from spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). A four-detector Hanbury Brown-Twiss interferometer is used with the idler serving as herald; coincidence histograms are acquired as functions of pump power, wavelength (via spectrometer coupling), and coincidence window. The central claim is that the observed statistics are best described by a negative binomial distribution, consistent with thermal-light behavior, with additional observations of asymmetric photon-number growth around degeneracy and wavelength-dependent scaling (nonlinear at shorter wavelengths, more linear at longer wavelengths).

Significance. If the measured histograms faithfully represent the intrinsic SPDC photon-number distribution, the work supplies useful experimental data on the spectral dependence of SPDC statistics, which is relevant for quantum-metrology and quantum-communication applications that rely on heralded single-photon or thermal sources. The use of a spectrometer to resolve bandwidth effects is a positive feature. However, the absence of reported error bars, quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics, and explicit propagation of losses or dark counts reduces the immediate utility of the result for quantitative modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental setup] The central claim that the measured statistics are 'best described by a Negative Binomial Distribution' (abstract) rests on the assumption that the four-detector heralded coincidence scheme captures the true photon-number distribution without significant distortion. The skeptic note correctly identifies that wavelength-dependent efficiency, dark-count admixture, or spectrometer-induced mode selection could shift the observed distribution; the manuscript does not appear to provide Monte-Carlo simulations or corrected histograms that quantify these effects.
  2. [Abstract] No error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or quantitative fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ² or likelihood ratios comparing negative binomial to Poisson or compound-Poisson alternatives) are reported in the abstract or described in the provided text. This prevents independent verification of the preference for the negative binomial model.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify the exact coincidence-time window used and whether it was varied systematically; the abstract mentions dependence on coincidence time but does not quantify the effect.
  2. [Results] Define the precise spectral bandwidths selected by the spectrometer and state the corresponding effective mode numbers; this would strengthen the claim of wavelength-dependent generation efficiency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important points regarding the robustness of our statistical claims and the need for quantitative metrics. We have revised the manuscript to address these issues by adding simulations, error bars, and fit statistics. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental setup] The central claim that the measured statistics are 'best described by a Negative Binomial Distribution' (abstract) rests on the assumption that the four-detector heralded coincidence scheme captures the true photon-number distribution without significant distortion. The skeptic note correctly identifies that wavelength-dependent efficiency, dark-count admixture, or spectrometer-induced mode selection could shift the observed distribution; the manuscript does not appear to provide Monte-Carlo simulations or corrected histograms that quantify these effects.

    Authors: We agree that potential experimental distortions must be quantified to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added Monte-Carlo simulations that incorporate wavelength-dependent detection efficiency, dark-count rates, and spectrometer-induced mode filtering. These simulations show that the observed histograms remain consistent with a negative-binomial distribution under realistic loss and noise levels; the corrected histograms are now presented in the supplementary material together with a discussion of the residual bias. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or quantitative fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ² or likelihood ratios comparing negative binomial to Poisson or compound-Poisson alternatives) are reported in the abstract or described in the provided text. This prevents independent verification of the preference for the negative binomial model.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original submission lacked explicit error bars and quantitative model-comparison metrics. The revised manuscript now includes error bars on all photon-number data points (derived from Poisson statistics of the coincidence counts), states the data-exclusion criteria applied to the histograms, and reports reduced χ² values together with likelihood-ratio tests comparing the negative-binomial model against Poisson and compound-Poisson alternatives. These additions appear in the methods section and in the figure captions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental photon-statistics measurement

full rationale

This is an experimental paper that records coincidence histograms from a four-detector heralded SPDC setup and compares the resulting photon-number distributions to standard models (Negative Binomial, Poisson, etc.). No derivation, first-principles calculation, or fitted-parameter prediction is presented; the claim that the data are best described by a Negative Binomial Distribution is obtained by direct statistical comparison of measured counts to the functional forms of the candidate distributions. There are no self-referential equations, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes that reduce the reported result to its own inputs by construction. The work is therefore self-contained as an empirical characterization.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of quantum optics for SPDC pair generation and thermal statistics; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SPDC produces photon pairs whose joint statistics are those of a thermal source when integrated over the detection bandwidth.
    Invoked when stating that negative binomial distribution describes the measured counts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1093 out tokens · 31354 ms · 2026-05-19T12:37:51.360405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics-Informed Discrete-Event Simulation of Polarization-Encoded Quantum Networks

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Extension of SeQUeNCe simulator integrates Jones-calculus optics and fiber physics models to enable validated simulation of polarization-encoded quantum networks and entanglement distribution.

  2. Physics-Informed Discrete-Event Simulation of Polarization-Encoded Quantum Networks

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extends the SeQUeNCe simulator with Jones-calculus components and multi-section fiber models to enable validated, hardware-parameterized predictions of entanglement distribution in polarization-encoded quantum networks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Spectrally Resolved Higher Order Photon Statistics of Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion

    Introduction Sources of higher order photon states have been of great interest in the fields of quantum communications [1], metrology [2], and sensing [3]. In communications, these states offer the ability to enhance security and information capacity [4]. In metrology and sensing, quantum (Sub-Poissonian) states of light allows for operation below the sho...

  2. [2]

    The SPDC is generated from a 1mm thick β-BBO crystal, which is mounted on a rotational (translation) stage to optimize phase matching (focusing)

    Methods The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The SPDC is generated from a 1mm thick β-BBO crystal, which is mounted on a rotational (translation) stage to optimize phase matching (focusing). Since the crystal is type-I ( e → o+ o), the signal and idler photons will have the same polarization, that is, perpendicular to the pump polarization. The si...

  3. [3]

    Results The measured spectrum of the SPDC was found to be asymmetric about the degenerate wavelength of 800 nm, with lower wavelengths having higher intensity. Asymmetric spectra have also been shown in previous works (for example [56]) and is sometimes attributed to loss in the setup [57], for example, detection inefficiency or optical transmission. The ...

  4. [4]

    Conclusion This work serves to lay the ground work of characterizing and optimizing more complex light sources of higher order photon states. The presented results examined the photon statistics dependence of type-I degenerate noncollinear Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion as functions of wavelength, pump power, and coincidence time. The detection sc...

  5. [5]

    using multi mode fiber with the capability of being used across the visible spectrum. The SPDC emission was found to have asymmetric generation efficiency at high pump powers around the degenerate wavelength of 800 nm, where the lower wavelengths proved to have a higher intensity. This behavior was transmitted directly to the subsequent photon statistics,...

  6. [6]

    Acknowledgments The authors are greatly appreciative of the assistance and computational implementa- tion provided by Andrew Rockovich [26] at the end of the calculation of the theoretical photon emission rate used to extract the detection efficiency and normalize the data

  7. [7]

    Conflict of Interest Statement The authors claim no conflict of interest

  8. [8]

    Data Availability Statement The experimental data used to make the figures will be publicly accessible through Dryad when the link becomes available

  9. [9]

    Photon Probability Distributions Because of the bosonic behavior of the SPDC emission, correlations within one of the beams can be bunched, leading to thermal statistics [58, 39]

    Supplemental 8.1. Photon Probability Distributions Because of the bosonic behavior of the SPDC emission, correlations within one of the beams can be bunched, leading to thermal statistics [58, 39]. In the case of thermal light, the statistics are governed by the Bose-Einstein Distribution [59]: P (n) = 1 ⟨n⟩ + 1 ⟨n⟩ ⟨n⟩ + 1 !n (1) where ⟨n⟩ is the average...

  10. [10]

    Generation of multi-photon Fock states at telecommunication wavelength using picosecond pulsed light, May 2024

    Tatsuki Sonoyama, Kazuma Takahashi, Tomoki Sano, Takumi Suzuki, Takefumi Nomura, Masahiro Yabuno, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Kan Takase, Warit Asavanant, Mamoru Endo, and Akira Furusawa. Generation of multi-photon Fock states at telecommunication wavelength using picosecond pulsed light, May 2024. arXiv:2405.06567 [quant-ph]

  11. [11]

    Quantum- enhanced metrology with large Fock states

    Xiaowei Deng, Sai Li, Zi-Jie Chen, Zhongchu Ni, Yanyan Cai, Jiasheng Mai, Libo Zhang, Pan Zheng, Haifeng Yu, Chang-Ling Zou, Song Liu, Fei Yan, Yuan Xu, and Dapeng Yu. Quantum- enhanced metrology with large Fock states. Nature Physics, 20(12):1874–1880, December 2024. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  12. [12]

    Optical interferometer using two-mode squeezed light for enhanced chip-integrated quantum metrology

    Patrick Tritschler, Torsten Ohms, Andr´ e Zimmermann, Fabian Zschocke, Thomas Strohm, and Peter Degenfeld-Schonburg. Optical interferometer using two-mode squeezed light for enhanced chip-integrated quantum metrology. Physical Review A, 110(1):012621, July 2024

  13. [13]

    High-Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges

    Daniele Cozzolino, Beatrice Da Lio, Davide Bacco, and Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe. High-Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges. Advanced Quantum Technologies , 2(12):1900038, 2019. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.201900038

  14. [14]

    Multiphoton quantum optics and quantum state engineering

    Fabio Dell’Anno, Silvio De Siena, and Fabrizio Illuminati. Multiphoton quantum optics and quantum state engineering. Physics Reports, 428(2):53–168, May 2006

  15. [15]

    Optimized higher-order photon state classification by machine learning

    Guangpeng Xu, Jeffrey Carvalho, Chiran Wijesundara, and Tim Thomay. Optimized higher-order photon state classification by machine learning. APL Quantum, 1(3):036122, September 2024

  16. [16]

    Spectral characterization of SPDC-based single-photon sources for quantum key distribution

    Sabine Euler, Erik Fitzke, Oleg Nikiforov, Daniel Hofmann, Till Dolejsky, and Thomas Walther. Spectral characterization of SPDC-based single-photon sources for quantum key distribution. The European Physical Journal Special Topics , 230(4):1073–1080, June 2021

  17. [17]

    Bartley, Adriana E

    Georg Harder, Tim J. Bartley, Adriana E. Lita, Sae Woo Nam, Thomas Gerrits, and Christine Silberhorn. Single-Mode Parametric-Down-Conversion States with 50 Photons as a Source for Mesoscopic Quantum Optics. Physical Review Letters, 116(14):143601, April 2016

  18. [18]

    Highly efficient and pure few-photon source on chip

    Zhaohui Ma, Jia-Yang Chen, Malvika Garikapati, Zhan Li, Chao Tang, Yong Meng Sua, and Yu- Ping Huang. Highly efficient and pure few-photon source on chip. Physical Review Applied , 20(4):044033, October 2023

  19. [19]

    Spontaneous parametric down-conversion

    Christophe Couteau. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Contemporary Physics , 59(3):291–304, July 2018. arXiv:1809.00127 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

  20. [20]

    Ortega, Jorge Fuenzalida, Mirela Selimovic, Krishna Dovzhik, Lukas Achatz, S¨ oren Wengerowsky, Rodrigo F

    Evelyn A. Ortega, Jorge Fuenzalida, Mirela Selimovic, Krishna Dovzhik, Lukas Achatz, S¨ oren Wengerowsky, Rodrigo F. Shiozaki, Sebastian Philipp Neumann, Martin Bohmann, and Rupert Ursin. Spatial and spectral characterization of photon pairs at telecommunication wavelengths from type-0 spontaneous parametric downconversion. Journal of the Optical Society ...

  21. [21]

    Subrahmanyam, and Anand K

    Girish Kulkarni, V. Subrahmanyam, and Anand K. Jha. Intrinsic upper bound on two-qubit polarization entanglement predetermined by pump polarization correlations in parametric down- conversion. Physical Review A, 93(6):063842, June 2016. Publisher: American Physical Society

  22. [22]

    Zachary M. E. Chaisson, Patrick F. Poitras, Mica¨ el Richard, Yannick Castonguay-Page, Paul- Henry Glinel, V´ eronique Landry, and Deny R. Hamel. Phase-stable source of high-quality three-photon polarization entanglement by cascaded down-conversion. Physical Review A , 105(6):063705, June 2022. Publisher: American Physical Society

  23. [23]

    Cheng Li, Boris Braverman, Girish Kulkarni, and Robert W. Boyd. Experimental generation of polarization entanglement from spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by spatiotemporally highly incoherent light. Physical Review A , 107(4):L041701, April 2023. Publisher: American Physical Society. Spectrally Resolved Higher Order Photon Statistics of SPDC 14

  24. [24]

    S. C. Yorulmaz, M. P. van Exter, and M. J. A. de Dood. The role of spatial and temporal modes in pulsed parametric down-conversion. Optics express, 22(5):5913–5926, 2014. Place: WASHINGTON Publisher: Optical Soc Amer

  25. [25]

    Walborn, C.H

    S.P. Walborn, C.H. Monken, S. P´ adua, and P.H. Souto Ribeiro. Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion. Physics Reports, 495(4-5):87–139, October 2010

  26. [26]

    Goodson Iii

    ¨Ozg¨ un S¨ uzer and Theodore G. Goodson Iii. Does pump beam intensity affect the efficiency of spontaneous parametric down conversion? Optics Express, 16(25):20166–20175, December 2008. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  27. [27]

    Optimal focusing conditions for bright spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources

    Lorenzo Coccia, Alberto Santamato, Giuseppe Vallone, and Paolo Villoresi. Optimal focusing conditions for bright spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources. Physical Review A , 107(6):063712, June 2023

  28. [28]

    Spatial and spectral properties of entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump

    Jong-Chan Lee and Yoon-Ho Kim. Spatial and spectral properties of entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump. Optics Communications , 366:442–450, 2016

  29. [29]

    Ryan S. Bennink. Optimal collinear Gaussian beams for spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A, 81(5):053805, May 2010

  30. [30]

    Spatial and temporal characteristics of spontaneous parametric down-conversion with varying focal planes of interacting beams

    Richard Bernecker, Baghdasar Baghdasaryan, and Stephan Fritzsche. Spatial and temporal characteristics of spontaneous parametric down-conversion with varying focal planes of interacting beams. The European Physical Journal D , 77(9):172, September 2023

  31. [31]

    Spectral properties of transverse Laguerre-Gauss modes in parametric down-conversion

    Carlos Sevilla-Guti´ errez, Varun Raj Kaipalath, Baghdasar Baghdasaryan, Markus Gr¨ afe, Stephan Fritzsche, and Fabian Steinlechner. Spectral properties of transverse Laguerre-Gauss modes in parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A, 109(2):023534, February 2024

  32. [32]

    W. P. Grice and I. A. Walmsley. Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down- conversion with a broadband pump. Physical Review A, 56(2):1627–1634, August 1997

  33. [33]

    Ram´ ırez-Alarc´ on, H

    R. Ram´ ırez-Alarc´ on, H. Cruz-Ram´ ırez, and A. B. U’Ren. Effects of crystal length on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs. Laser Physics, 23(5):055204, April 2013. Publisher: IOP Publishing

  34. [34]

    M. P. Van Exter, A. Aiello, S. S. R. Oemrawsingh, G. Nienhuis, and J. P. Woerdman. Effect of spatial filtering on the Schmidt decomposition of entangled photons. Physical Review A , 74(1):012309, July 2006

  35. [35]

    Maximizing Purity and Heralding Efficiency of Type-I Down-Converted Photons Using Beam Focal Parameters, October 2024

    Andrew Rockovich, Shu’an Wang, and Daniel Gauthier. Maximizing Purity and Heralding Efficiency of Type-I Down-Converted Photons Using Beam Focal Parameters, October 2024. arXiv:2401.02319 [quant-ph]

  36. [36]

    Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Sources for Multiphoton Ex- periments

    Chao Zhang, Yun-Feng Huang, Bi-Heng Liu, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo. Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Sources for Multiphoton Ex- periments. Advanced Quantum Technologies , 4(5):2000132, 2021. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202000132

  37. [37]

    Gain-Induced Group Delay in Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion

    Guillaume Thekkadath, Martin Houde, Duncan England, Philip Bustard, Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Nicol´ as Quesada, and Ben Sussman. Gain-Induced Group Delay in Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion. Physical Review Letters, 133(20):203601, November 2024

  38. [38]

    Optimal photon pairs for quantum communication protocols

    Miko laj Lasota and Piotr Kolenderski. Optimal photon pairs for quantum communication protocols. Scientific Reports, 10(1):20810, November 2020

  39. [39]

    Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing

    Masahiro Takeoka, Rui-Bo Jin, and Masahide Sasaki. Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing. New Journal of Physics , 17(4):043030, April 2015

  40. [40]

    How colors influence numbers: Photon statistics of parametric down-conversion

    Wolfgang Mauerer, Malte Avenhaus, Wolfram Helwig, and Christine Silberhorn. How colors influence numbers: Photon statistics of parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A , 80(5):053815, November 2009

  41. [41]

    Coincidence detection of spatially correlated photon pairs with a monolithic time-resolving detector array

    Manuel Untern¨ ahrer, B¨ anz Bessire, Leonardo Gasparini, David Stoppa, and Andr´ e Stefanov. Coincidence detection of spatially correlated photon pairs with a monolithic time-resolving detector array. Optics Express, 24(25):28829, December 2016. Spectrally Resolved Higher Order Photon Statistics of SPDC 15

  42. [42]

    Matekole, Yehuda Pilnyak, Daniel Istrati, Jonathan P

    Lior Cohen, Elisha S. Matekole, Yehuda Pilnyak, Daniel Istrati, Jonathan P. Dowling, and Hagai S. Eisenberg. Measuring the Schmidt number of parametric down conversion by exploiting photon distribution. AVS Quantum Science, 5(2):025002, June 2023

  43. [43]

    Nilakantha Meher and Anand K. Jha. Dependence of the photon statistics of down-converted field-modes on the photon statistics of the pump field-mode. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 37(8):2248, August 2020

  44. [44]

    Sanders, Stephen D

    Edo Waks, Eleni Diamanti, Barry C. Sanders, Stephen D. Bartlett, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto. Direct Observation of Nonclassical Photon Statistics in Parametric Down-Conversion. Physical Review Letters, 92(11):113602, March 2004

  45. [45]

    Roy J. Glauber. Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field. Physical Review , 131(6):2766–2788, September 1963. Publisher: American Physical Society

  46. [46]

    Thermal photon statistics in spontaneous parametric downconversion

    Fabio Paleari, Alessandra Andreoni, Guido Zambra, and Maria Bondani. Thermal photon statistics in spontaneous parametric downconversion. Optics Express, 12(13):2816, June 2004

  47. [47]

    Avenhaus, H

    M. Avenhaus, H. B. Coldenstrodt-Ronge, K. Laiho, W. Mauerer, I. A. Walmsley, and C. Silberhorn. Photon Number Statistics of Multimode Parametric Down-Conversion. Physical Review Letters, 101(5):053601, August 2008

  48. [48]

    Direct measurement of heralded single-photon statistics from a parametric down-conversion source

    David H¨ ockel, Lars Koch, and Oliver Benson. Direct measurement of heralded single-photon statistics from a parametric down-conversion source. Physical Review A, 83(1):013802, January 2011

  49. [49]

    P. R. Tapster and J. G. Rarity. Photon statistics of pulsed parametric light. Journal of modern optics, 45(3):595–604, 1998. Place: ABINGDON Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group

  50. [50]

    Sanders, Eleni Diamanti, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto

    Edo Waks, Barry C. Sanders, Eleni Diamanti, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto. Highly nonclassical photon statistics in parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A, 73(3):033814, March 2006

  51. [51]

    Galinis, M

    J. Galinis, M. Karpinski, G. Tamosauskas, K. Dobek, and A. Piskarskas. PHOTON CORRE- LATION AND STATISTICS OF SPONTANEOUS PARAMETRIC DOWN-CONVERSION PUMPED BY BLUE LED IN LiIO3 CRYSTAL. Lithuanian journal of physics , 52(4):285–294,

  52. [52]

    Place: VILNIUS Publisher: Lithuanian Physical Soc

  53. [53]

    Hamar, V

    M. Hamar, V. Mich´ alek, and A. Pathak. Non-classical Signature of Parametric Fluorescence and its Application in Metrology. Measurement Science Review, 14(4):227–236, August 2014

  54. [54]

    Statistics of multiphoton events in spontaneous parametric down-conversion

    Wojciech Wasilewski, Czes law Radzewicz, Robert Frankowski, and Konrad Banaszek. Statistics of multiphoton events in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A , 78(3):033831, September 2008

  55. [55]

    Wavelength variable generation and detection of photon pairs in visible and mid-infrared regions via spontaneous parametric downconversion

    Masaya Arahata, Yu Mukai, Bo Cao, Toshiyuki Tashima, Ryo Okamoto, and Shigeki Takeuchi. Wavelength variable generation and detection of photon pairs in visible and mid-infrared regions via spontaneous parametric downconversion. Journal of the Optical Society of America B , 38(6):1934, June 2021

  56. [56]

    Dorfman and Shaul Mukamel

    Konstantin E. Dorfman and Shaul Mukamel. Photon coincidence counting in parametric down- conversion: Interference of field-matter quantum pathways. Physical Review A , 86(2):023805, August 2012

  57. [57]

    Introduction to the absolute brightness and number statistics in spontaneous parametric down-conversion

    James Schneeloch, Samuel H Knarr, Daniela F Bogorin, Mackenzie L Levangie, Christopher C Tison, Rebecca Frank, Gregory A Howland, Michael L Fanto, and Paul M Alsing. Introduction to the absolute brightness and number statistics in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Journal of Optics , 21(4):043501, April 2019

  58. [58]

    I. S. Osad’ko. Sub- and super-Poissonian photon statistics of single-molecule fluorescence blinking. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , 104(6):853–865, June 2007

  59. [59]

    Photon statistics and signal to noise ratio for incoherent diffraction imaging

    Fabian Trost, Kartik Ayyer, and Henry N Chapman. Photon statistics and signal to noise ratio for incoherent diffraction imaging. New Journal of Physics , 22(8):083070, August 2020. Publisher: IOP Publishing

  60. [60]

    Role of photon statistics of light source in ghost imaging

    Kam Wai Clifford Chan. Role of photon statistics of light source in ghost imaging. Optics Letters, 37(13):2739–2741, July 2012. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  61. [61]

    Photon-counting statistics-based support vector machine with multi- mode photon illumination for quantum imaging

    Jin-Woo Kim, Jeong-Sik Cho, Christian Sacarelo, Nur Duwi Fat Fitri, Ju-Seong Hwang, and Spectrally Resolved Higher Order Photon Statistics of SPDC 16 June-Koo Kevin Rhee. Photon-counting statistics-based support vector machine with multi- mode photon illumination for quantum imaging. Scientific Reports, 12(1):16594, October 2022. Publisher: Nature Publish...

  62. [62]

    Photon-statistics-based classical ghost imaging with one single detector

    Simone Kuhn, S´ ebastien Hartmann, and Wolfgang Els¨ aßer. Photon-statistics-based classical ghost imaging with one single detector. Optics Letters , 41(12):2863–2866, June 2016. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

  63. [63]

    Z.-Y. J. Ou. Multi-photon Quantum interference. Springer, 2007

  64. [64]

    Thermal noise and correlations in photon detection

    J Zmuidzinas. Thermal noise and correlations in photon detection. Applied Optics, 42(25):4989– 5008, 2003. Place: WASHINGTON Publisher: Optical Soc Amer

  65. [65]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss. Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light. Nature, 177(4497):27–29, January 1956. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  66. [66]

    Spectral properties of entangled photon pairs generated via frequency-degenerate type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion

    So-Young Baek and Yoon-Ho Kim. Spectral properties of entangled photon pairs generated via frequency-degenerate type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A , 77(4):043807, April 2008

  67. [67]

    Spectral and statistical properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion, July

    Kirill Spasibko. Spectral and statistical properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion, July

  68. [68]

    arXiv:2007.12999 [quant-ph]

  69. [69]

    Photon bunching in parametric down-conversion with continuous-wave excitation

    Bibiane Blauensteiner, Isabelle Herbauts, Stefano Bettelli, Andreas Poppe, and Hannes H¨ ubel. Photon bunching in parametric down-conversion with continuous-wave excitation. Physical Review A, 79(6):063846, June 2009

  70. [70]

    M. Fox. Quantum Optics: An Introduction , volume (1st ed., Vol. 15). Oxford University Press, 2006