Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Observed Latitudinal, Longitudinal and Temporal Variability of Io's Atmosphere Simulated by a Purely Sublimation Driven Atmosphere

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a purely sublimation-driven atmosphere, with a single tuned thermal diffusivity value, can reproduce the observed latitudinal, longitudinal, and temporal variability of Io's SO2 atmosphere.

desk verdict A transparent one-parameter model for Io's sublimation atmosphere with a real seasonal prediction, but Eq. (8) as printed is off by ~10^3 and the headline numbers can't be reproduced until it's fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19152 v1 pith:6IVZR4YE submitted 2025-06-23 astro-ph.EP

A.-C. Dott , J. Saur , S. Schlegel , D.F. Strobel , K. de Kleer , I. de Pater This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords IosublimationatmosphereSO2columndensitythermalinertiadiffusivityeclipsecollapseseasonalvariabilitytidalheating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the global structure of Io's SO2 atmosphere—its latitude bands, day–night asymmetry, sub-Jovian/anti-Jovian difference, eclipse collapse, and seasonal cycle—can all be produced by solar-driven sublimation of surface frost alone, without needing volcanoes to shape the large-scale pattern. The claim matters because it would settle a long-standing debate: volcanic outgassing then adds only local perturbations, while sublimation sets where and when the atmosphere is densest. The model's only free parameter is the subsurface thermal diffusivity, which it fixes at $\alpha = 2.41\times10^{-7}\,\mathrm{m^2\,s^{-1}}$ (thermal inertia 298 MKS) by fitting the observed diurnal temperature range and latitudinal column-density decrease. On that single setting the model matches observed dayside column densities of $3.7\times10^{16}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ (sub-Jovian) and $8.5\times10^{16}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ (anti-Jovian), an equator-to-pole drop of over an order of magnitude, and a column-density variation of nearly an order of magnitude over a Jovian year.

What carries the argument

The central object is a one-dimensional, time-dependent heat-diffusion equation for Io's subsurface temperature, $\partial T/\partial t = \alpha\,\partial^2 T/\partial z^2 + (\rho c_p)^{-1}(P - L)$, with solar insolation, Jupiter's thermal and reflected radiation, internal tidal heating at the lower boundary, and surface radiation loss as source and sink terms, all evaluated with SPICE-derived exact celestial geometry. The free parameter is the thermal diffusivity $\alpha$, which controls how much of the diurnal heating is stored in the subsurface and re-emitted at night. The second step maps surface temperature to column density through the vapor-pressure equilibrium formula $N_{\mathrm{sub}} = 1.1516\times10^{16}\,\exp(-4510/T)/(m_{\mathrm{SO_2}} g_0)$ (Wagman, 1979), which is what makes the model testable against observations. This machinery converts orbital geometry and one material property into a global, time-varying map of the atmosphere.

What would settle it

A spatially resolved, minute-cadence observation of Io's SO2 column at the dawn terminator during an eclipse ingress would decide the issue: the model requires the column to drop by more than an order of magnitude within about ten minutes, tracking the computed surface temperature. If the observed column either lags the surface-temperature drop by substantially more than ten minutes or remains high over frost regions that have already cooled, the instantaneous-equilibrium assumption of Equation (8) is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that, on global scales, Io's SO2 atmosphere is a purely sublimation-driven atmosphere in the quantitative sense that most of its observed spatial and temporal variability is reproduced by mapping the local surface temperature, computed from a 1-D heat-diffusion equation with exact orbital geometry, to the vapor-pressure equilibrium column density of SO2. With the best-fit thermal diffusivity $\alpha = 2.41\times10^{-7}\,\mathrm{m^2\,s^{-1}}$ ($\Gamma = 298$ MKS), the model produces dayside maxima of $3.7\times10^{16}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ on the sub-Jovian and $8.5\times10^{16}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ on the anti-Jovian hemisphere, a day–night contrast of almost two orders of magnitude at the equator, and a latitudinal decrease of more than one order of magnitude that matches Lyman-$\alpha$ observations. The anti-Jovian excess by a factor of about four is a direct geometric consequence: because of Io's locked rotation, the anti-Jovian hemisphere is never in Jupiter's shadow and receives about two more hours of sunlight each day. Seasonal effects appear as hemispheric summers, with northern summer near perihelion and northern winter near aphelion, and the anomalous warm poles require an additional conductive heat flux of at least 1.2 W/$m^{2}$ at high latitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the atmosphere is everywhere in instantaneous vapor-pressure equilibrium with a uniform, frost-covered surface, so that local column density is a pure function of local surface temperature; if the frost is patchy, if winds move the gas, or if sublimation and condensation lag behind temperature changes, the mapping in Equation (8) breaks, and the authors concede it fails at eclipse ingress/egress and at the terminators.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, volcanoes control only local and transient patches of Io's atmosphere; the global pattern of SO2 is set by insolation and thermal inertia.
  • The anti-Jovian hemisphere should be denser than the sub-Jovian by about a factor of four at all seasons, as a direct consequence of Io's eclipse geometry.
  • Io's atmosphere should collapse by roughly an order of magnitude within about ten minutes of Jupiter's eclipse ingress, and recover similarly at egress.
  • Over a Jovian year the equatorial column density should change by about a factor of seven, with the northern and southern hemispheres alternately warmer by about 4 K.
  • Io's polar temperatures of 75–90 K require an internal conductive heat flux that increases toward the poles (roughly 1.2 W/m^2 in summer, 2.1 W/m^2 in winter), which favors deep-mantle tidal heating over a shallow magma ocean.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equilibrium mapping is correct, eclipse collapse and regrowth become a remote probe of Io's surface thermal diffusivity at centimeter depths, giving a testable prediction for future spacecraft or high-cadence ground-based observations.
  • The same surface-temperature-to-column mapping could be applied to other sublimation-dominated tenuous atmospheres, such as Triton's nitrogen or Pluto's, where the equilibrium assumption is shakier; the model's success on Io would make it a useful null hypothesis there.
  • The polar heat-flux requirement (1.2–2.1 W/m^2) is essentially independent of insolation and albedo at high latitudes, so a future measurement of Io's polar heat flow would either confirm the deep-mantle heating scenario or falsify the model's polar extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a time-dependent 1-D heat-diffusion model of Io's surface and subsurface temperatures, driven by solar insolation, Jovian thermal and reflected radiation, and internal tidal heating, with SPICE-based exact celestial geometry including Io's inclination and eclipses. Surface temperatures are converted to SO2 column densities under the assumption of instantaneous local vapor-pressure equilibrium with a uniform frost layer (Eq. 8). A parameter study over thermal diffusivity selects a default value alpha = 2.41e-7 m^2/s (thermal inertia 298 MKS) by matching observed diurnal temperature/column variations and the latitudinal column falloff. The resulting model reproduces an equator-to-pole column decrease of more than an order of magnitude, a sub-Jovian versus anti-Jovian asymmetry with dayside maxima of 3.7e16 and 8.5e16 cm^-2, a diurnal collapse of nearly two orders of magnitude, seasonal hemispheric asymmetries tied to Io's inclination, and requires an enhanced polar conductive heat flux of about 1.2-2.1 W/m^2 to explain the warm poles.

Significance. If the quantitative mapping in Eq. (8) is corrected, the model provides a simple, transparent, and falsifiable baseline for how much of Io's large-scale atmospheric structure can be explained by a purely sublimation-driven atmosphere. Strengths include the use of exact celestial geometry, a publicly available code, and an unusually candid Appendix A3 listing model limitations. The main quantitative claims, however, are conditional on the correctness of Eq. (8), which as printed cannot produce the reported column densities, and the headline latitudinal comparison is partly in-sample because the free thermal diffusivity is tuned against that same latitudinal profile. The paper is within the scope of JGR: Planets and offers a useful reference framework for future observations, provided the central equation and the framing of the parameter fit are fixed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (8); Figures 5 and 9] Equation (8) as printed is numerically inconsistent with the reported results. For the stated values m_SO2 = 1.064e-25 kg and g0 = 1.81 m/s^2, the equation gives N_sub(T=110 K) ~ 9e18 cm^-2 and N_sub(T=116.5 K) ~ 9e19 cm^-2, whereas the manuscript reports maximum dayside column densities of 3.7e16 and 8.5e16 cm^-2. The prefactor appears to be about 10^3 too large; replacing 1.1516e16 by 1.1516e13 Pa would yield values consistent with the reported columns at the stated dayside temperatures. Because Eq. (8) is the sole link between the simulated surface temperatures and every atmospheric column density in Sections 3.3-3.6, this is a load-bearing issue that must be corrected and verified against the public code output before publication.
  2. [Section 3.3 and Abstract] The default thermal diffusivity alpha = 0.1 alpha_0 is selected by 'quantitative comparison' with the observed latitudinal column-density variation (Strobel and Wolven 2001) and with the observed diurnal temperature/column variation (Section 3.1 and 3.3). Therefore the agreement shown in Figures 5-7 for the equator-to-pole falloff and the diurnal collapse is a consistency check, not an independent prediction, and the abstract's wording 'We find that a thermal diffusivity ... yields ... decreasing ... in accordance with the observed spatial variations' should be reframed to state explicitly that this parameter was tuned to those observations. An out-of-sample test, for example fixing alpha using only the diurnal temperature data and then comparing to the latitudinal column profile, would materially strengthen the central claim.
  3. [Appendix A3 and Eq. (8)] The central T-to-column mapping assumes instantaneous vapor-pressure equilibrium with a uniform, frost-covered surface everywhere. The authors candidly acknowledge in Appendix A3 that this equilibrium fails near eclipse ingress/egress and at terminators, but the paper's headline quantitative comparisons are made at the dayside maximum, where the equilibrium assumption is most favorable. Still, the model also assumes no winds, no lateral transport, and no partial frost coverage; each of these could change columns by factors of several. I ask the authors to add a short quantitative sensitivity statement, or at least a discussion of how partial frost coverage or finite sublimation/condensation rates would alter the reported column densities, so that the reader can gauge how robust the 'purely sublimation-driven' conclusion is to violations of the local-equilibrium assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (8)] Please define all symbols in Eq. (8) explicitly, including the units of the prefactor (Pa), the mass of the SO2 molecule in kg, and the explicit statement that T is in Kelvin; the current notation 'm_SO2[kg]·g0[m s^-2]' is confusing.
  2. [Table 1] The parameter-study range is printed as '1.61−96.4×10^-7' which is ambiguous; use consistent scientific notation such as 1.61e-7 to 9.64e-6 m^2/s.
  3. [Section 3.5.1] The text says the model 'underestimates these column density values by a facor of 2 - 6' and cites '0.75−1.1×10^17 cm^-2'; there are typographical errors ('facor') and inconsistent spacing that should be corrected.
  4. [Figure 9] The caption does not explain all symbol types (stars, diamonds, triangles) or their color coding; please add a legend or a complete caption so the multi-epoch observational comparisons are self-contained.
  5. [Section 3.3 and Figure 6] The comparison in Figure 6 is made separately for northern and southern hemispheres because of Io's inclination, but the text does not quantify the uncertainty in the modeled latitudinal profiles; adding a spread of alpha values within the stated 272-333 MKS range would help the reader judge whether the equator-to-pole decrease is robust within the fitted parameter range.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The default thermal diffusivity is tuned against the same latitudinal and diurnal column-density variations that are later reported as reproduced, so the equator-to-pole falloff and day-night collapse are partly by construction; the sub-Jovian/anti-Jovian and seasonal results remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3 (Latitudinal variation), parameter-selection paragraph and Figure 6 comparison; abstract]
    "By comparing the model results also with observations of the latitudinal column density variation (e.g. Strobel and Wolven (2001)) ... we then choose our default value through quantitative comparison. ... This comparison shows that our simulations yield dayside averaged column density values that agree with the ones from Strobel and Wolven (2001). Thus, a plain sublimation generated atmosphere reproduces the observed latitudinal decrease of the column density which is more than one order of magnitude."

    The model's only free parameter, the thermal diffusivity, is selected by quantitative comparison with the observed latitudinal column-density variation, and the same equator-to-pole decrease is then presented as a successful reproduction. Since the latitudinal temperature contrast and the corresponding sublimation column gradient are monotone functions of alpha, the Figure 6 agreement is a restatement of the fit rather than an independent prediction. The abstract's headline 'decreasing by more than one order of magnitude from equator to poles in accordance with observed spatial variations' is therefore partly forced by the choice of alpha.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1 (Thermal inertia effects) and Section 3.3.1 (Diurnal variations)]
    "We determine minimum and maximum values alpha_min = 1/12 alpha_0 and alpha_max = 1/8 alpha_0 of the thermal diffusivity that lead to a diurnal variation that corresponds to observations for the sub- and anti-Jovian hemisphere, especially when looking at the corresponding column density."

    The admissible range of the free parameter is explicitly chosen so that the diurnal column-density variation corresponds to observations on both hemispheres. The later claims of a day-night collapse by about one order of magnitude and a large day-night asymmetry are then generated by running that fitted alpha through Equations (6)-(8). The amplitude of the diurnal collapse is thus imposed in part by the fitting procedure rather than independently predicted; the collapse timescale, controlled by the heat equation, retains some independent content.

full rationale

The paper is transparent about its fitting procedure and most of its comparisons are not circular. The sub-Jovian versus anti-Jovian asymmetry, the seasonal/north-south asymmetry, and the long-term heliocentric variation are outputs of the solar-geometry and heat-diffusion model with a single global alpha; they are not tuned separately and can be tested against external observations. The latitudinal target paper (Strobel and Wolven 2001) has overlapping authorship, but its HST-derived columns are external observations; the circularity lies in fitting to that curve, not in the citation itself. The only self-citations (e.g., Saur and Strobel 2004, de Pater et al. 2020b, Roth et al. 2017) are not invoked as uniqueness theorems and do not carry the argument. The circularity is partial: the equator-to-pole falloff and the diurnal collapse amplitude are the same observables used to select the default thermal diffusivity, so those headline agreements reduce in part to the fit. Separately, I note a non-circularity correctness risk: the printed Eq. (8) with the stated dayside temperatures 110-116.5 K yields column densities around 1e19-1e20 cm^-2, roughly two orders above the reported 3.7e16-8.5e16 cm^-2, so the printed prefactor and the reported results are mutually inconsistent; this load-bearing numerical issue should be checked in the code before the quantitative claims are accepted. Score 6 reflects one or more predictions partially reducing to the fitted parameter, while substantial independent predictions remain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central atmospheric calculation has one fitted free parameter (thermal diffusivity), plus an ad hoc polar heat flux to match warm-pole observations. The model rests on background assumptions: uniform SO2 frost, instantaneous vapor-pressure equilibrium, constant thermal diffusivity with depth, and neglect of winds and lateral conduction. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Thermal diffusivity alpha = 2.41e-7 m^2/s (0.1 alpha0; thermal inertia 298 MKS; constrained range 272-333 MKS)
    The single free parameter of the reference model, chosen in Section 3.3 by quantitative comparison of modeled and observed latitudinal and diurnal column density and temperature variations.
  • Polar conductive heat flux = 1.2 W/m^2 (summer pole), 2.1 W/m^2 (winter pole)
    Adjusted in Section 3.7 so modeled polar surface temperatures reach the observed ~80 K; not independently constrained.
  • Latitude-dependent conductive heat flux profile = 0.48 W/m^2 at equator rising to 1.44 W/m^2 poleward of 60 degrees
    Constructed scenario in Section 3.7.2 to reproduce warm poles while keeping equatorial temperatures unchanged; ad hoc.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Uniform areal coverage of Io's surface by SO2 frost
    Invoked throughout; stated as a modeling assumption in Appendix A3; local patchiness would break the temperature-to-column mapping.
  • domain assumption Instantaneous vapor-pressure equilibrium between surface frost and atmosphere (Eq. 8)
    Invalid near eclipse ingress/egress and terminators, acknowledged in Section 3.1 and Appendix A3.
  • domain assumption Constant thermal diffusivity with depth
    Assumed in Section 2; contradicts de Pater et al. (2020b) inference of depth-dependent thermal inertia, acknowledged in limitations.
  • domain assumption Negligible lateral heat conduction and no wind/plasma redistribution
    Justified in Appendix A1 by scale separation; winds and plasma drag cited as beyond model scope in Appendix A3.
  • domain assumption Vapor pressure relation of Wagman (1979)
    Empirical sublimation pressure relation used in Eq. (8); standard but not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Internal heat: total 2.4 W/m^2, 20% conductive
    Taken from Steinke et al. (2020) and Veeder et al. (2015); affects lower boundary condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observed Latitudinal, Longitudinal and Temporal Variability of Io's Atmosphere Simulated by a Purely Sublimation Driven Atmosphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6IVZR4YE

@misc{pith2026250619152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observed Latitudinal, Longitudinal and Temporal Variability of Io's Atmosphere Simulated by a Purely Sublimation Driven Atmosphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6IVZR4YE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19152}
}
abstract

How much of Io's SO$_2$ atmosphere is driven by volcanic outgasing or sublimation of SO$_2$ surface frost is a question with a considerable history. We develop a time dependent surface temperature model including thermal inertia and the exact celestial geometry to model the radiation driven global structure and temporal evolution of Io's atmosphere. We show that many observations can be explained by assuming a purely sublimation driven atmosphere. We find that a thermal diffusivity $\alpha=2.41\times10^{-7}$ m$^2$s$^{-1}$ yields an averaged atmospheric SO$_2$ column density decreasing by more than one order of magnitude from the equator to the poles in accordance with the observed spatial variations of Io's column densities. Our model produces a strong day-night-asymmetry with modeled column density variations of almost two orders of magnitude at the equator as well as a sub-anti-Jovian hemisphere asymmetry, with maximum dayside column densities of $3.7\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$ for the sub-Jovian and $8.5\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$ for the anti-Jovian hemisphere. Both are consistent with the observed temporal and large-scale longitudinal variation of Io's atmosphere. We find that the diurnal variations of the surface temperature affect the subsurface structure up to a depth of 0.6m. Furthermore, we quantify seasonal effects with Io having a northern summer close to perihelion and a northern winter close to aphelion. Finally, we found that at Io's anomalous warm polar regions a conductive heat flux of at least 1.2 Wm$^{-2}$ is necessary to reach surface temperatures consistent with observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19152 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diurnal equatorial surface temperatures and sublimation driven SO2 column den￾sities as a function of time elapsed over 42 hour Io rotation period for different values of the thermal diffusivity at the sub- and anti-Jovian point. Key Io local solar times are annotated on the plot. As reference value for the thermal diffusivity we assume α0 = 2.41 × 10−6m2 s −1 and perform simulations varying α between 1 12α0 and 2α0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top view of Io’s orbit around Jupiter to illustrate the effect of Io’s eclipse by Jupiter. Remarkable here is that due to the moon’s locked rotation around the planet the anti￾Jovian hemisphere is Io’s nightside whenever Io is in eclipse by Jupiter. As a consequence, the anti-Jovian hemisphere receives 2 hrs more sunlight compared to the sub-Jovian hemisphere, which has a significant effects on Io’s atmosphere. –9– … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diurnal equatorial surface temperatures and sublimation driven SO2 column den￾sities as a function of time including the contribution of the thermal radiation from Jupiter Prad,Jup and the sunlight reflected from Jupiter Pref,Jup (solid line) and neglecting them (dashed line) at the sub-Jovian point. The surface temperature differs by ∼3 K with largest influence of Prad,Jup and Pref,Jup during the night. The corresp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Global surface temperature and column density maps, assuming that the sub￾Jovian longitude is the subsolar longitude, so the sub-Jovian hemisphere is illuminated by the sun. The column density is represented as contour lines and given in cm−2 , the surface temperature …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Global surface temperature and column density map assuming a thermal diffusivity of 0.1α0 with α0 = 2.41 × 10−6m2 s −1 . We distinguish here between (A) the sub-Jovian and (B) the anti-Jovian hemisphere being Io’s dayside. In both cases the atmosphere is mostly centere…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Column density as a function of latitude for Io’s northern (solid line) and southern (dashed-dot line) hemispheres assuming a thermal diffusivity of 0.1α0 with α0 = 2.41×10−6m2 s −1 in each case. The simulated northern hemisphere column density is higher than the south…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diurnal variations of the surface temperature and column density for all latitudes at (A) the sub-Jovian (φ= 0° W) and (B) the anti-Jovian longitude (φ= 180° W) assuming α = 0.1α0 with α0 = 2.41 × 10−6m2 s −1 . The eclipse effect generates an atmosphere that has a more…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: presents the vertical temperature profiles at the equator, on the anti-Jovian hemi￾sphere (φ = 180° W), assuming a thermal diffusivity of 0.1α0 and for one Io day in June 1999, where Jupiter was at perihelion. The shape of the vertical temperature profiles is mainly de…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Modeled diurnal maximum surface temperature and corresponding sublimation column density as a function of time between June 1996 and September 2013. Added are also the pericenter/apocenter locations (dashed lines) and observed column densities published by various auth…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Diurnal surface temperature and column density variation at φ = 180° W (anti￾Jovian). (A) One day during the northern summer season where Jupiter is near perihelion. (B) One day during southern summer, half a Jovian year (∼6 years) later when Jupiter is near aphe￾lion…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: which shows the simulated surface temperature of Io’s north and south pole during northern summer resulting from our default model with varying conductive heat fluxes between 0.4 and 3 Wm−2 . As expected, conductive heat fluxes of 1.2 Wm−2 for the summer and 2.1 Wm−2 …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (top) Global surface temperature and column density map of Io’s surface with the subsolar longitude occuring at φ=0◦ and the sub-Jovian hemisphere being fully illuminated. The simulations were performed for Jupiter (and Io) at perihelion. The internal heat fluxes were…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    apacite url apacite =6pt Acknowledgments. 6pt 1sp \@dates Received \@recvdate\@empty\@rcvaccrule \@recvdate \@revisedate\@empty ; revised \@revisedate; \@accptdate\@empty \@revisedate\@empty; accepted \@accptdate \@pubdate\@empty. ; published \@pubdate. -2pt \@authaddrs @list\@empty =.15in @list 1sp @list =9pt plus 2pt minus 6pt \@sluginfo width 4pc =3000...

    2001

  2. [3]

    APACrefauthors \ 1996

    SPICE APACrefauthors Acton, C H. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility Ancillary data services of nasa's navigation and ancillary information facility . Planetary and Space Science 44 1 65-70 . Planetary data system APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7 1996

  3. [4]

    , Fletcher, L N

    antunano_2019 APACrefauthors Antu \ n ano, A. , Fletcher, L N. , Orton, G S. , Melin, H. , Milan, S. , Rogers, J. Giles, R. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Jupiter’s atmospheric variability from long-term ground-based observations at 5 m Jupiter’s atmospheric variability from long-term ground-based observations at 5 m . The Astronomical Journal 158 3 130

    work page 2019

  4. [5]

    \ Goldstein, D B

    austin_2000 APACrefauthors Austin, J V. \ Goldstein, D B. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Rarefied gas model of Io's sublimation-driven atmosphere Rarefied gas model of io's sublimation-driven atmosphere . Icarus 148 2 370--383

    work page 2000

  5. [6]

    \ Dols, V

    bagenaldols2020 APACrefauthors Bagenal, F. \ Dols, V. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The Space Environment of Io and Europa The space environment of Io and Europa . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 125 5 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027485 APACrefDOI

    doi:10.1029/2019ja027485 2020

  6. [7]

    , Saur, J

    Bloecker_2018 APACrefauthors Blöcker, A. , Saur, J. , Roth, L. \ Strobel, D F. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . MHD Modeling of the Plasma Interaction With Io's Asymmetric Atmosphere MHD modeling of the plasma interaction with Io's asymmetric atmosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 123 11 9286-9311 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018J...

    doi:10.1029/2018ja025747 2018

  7. [8]

    , Emery, J P

    cruikshank_2010 APACrefauthors Cruikshank, D P. , Emery, J P. , Kornei, K A. , Bellucci, G. \ d’Aversa, E. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Eclipse reappearances of Io: Time-resolved spectroscopy (1.9--4.2 m) Eclipse reappearances of io: Time-resolved spectroscopy (1.9--4.2 m) . Icarus 205 2 516--527

    work page 2010

  8. [9]

    , Perry, J E

    Davies2023 APACrefauthors Davies, A G. , Perry, J E. , Williams, D A. \ Nelson, D M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Io’s polar volcanic thermal emission indicative of magma ocean and shallow tidal heating models Io’s polar volcanic thermal emission indicative of magma ocean and shallow tidal heating models . Nature Astronomy 8 1 94--100 . APACrefDOI doi:https://...

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02123-5 2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [10]

    , Perry, J E

    davies_2024 APACrefauthors Davies, A G. , Perry, J E. , Williams, D A. , Veeder, G J. \ Nelson, D M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . New Global Map of Io’s Volcanic Thermal Emission and Discovery of Hemispherical Dichotomies New global map of Io’s volcanic thermal emission and discove...

    2024 doi

  2. [12]

    , de Pater, I

    de_Kleer_2019_AJ APACrefauthors de Kleer, K. , de Pater, I. , Molter, E M. , Banks, E. , Davies, A G. , Alvarez, C. Tollefson, J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Io’s Volcanic Activity from Time Domain Adaptive Optics Observations: 2013–2018 Io’s volcanic activity from time domain ada...

    2019 doi

  3. [13]

    , McEwen, A S

    deKleer2019 APACrefauthors de Kleer, K. , McEwen, A S. , Park, R S. , Bierson, C J. , Davies, A G. , DellaGustina, D N. others APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Tidal heating: Lessons from Io and the jovian system-final report Tidal heating: Lessons from Io and the jovian system-final r...

    2019

  4. [14]

    , Keane, J T

    depater2020review APACrefauthors de Pater, I. , Keane, J T. , de Kleer, K. \ Davies, A G. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . A 2020 observational perspective of Io A 2020 observational perspective of Io . Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 49 1 643--678 . APACrefDOI doi:https:...

    2021 doi

  5. [15]

    \ Lissauer, J J

    dePater_2015_plansci APACrefauthors de Pater, I. \ Lissauer, J J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Planetary sciences Planetary sciences . Cambridge University Press

    2015

  6. [16]

    , Luszcz-Cook, S

    dePater_2020 APACrefauthors de Pater, I. , Luszcz-Cook, S. , Rojo, P. , Redwing, E. , de Kleer, K. \ Moullet, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020b . ALMA Observations of Io Going into and Coming out of Eclipse Alma observations of Io going into and coming out of eclipse . The Planetary S...

    doi

  7. [17]

    , Roe, H

    dePater_2002 APACrefauthors de Pater, I. , Roe, H. , Graham, J R. , Strobel, D F. \ Bernath, P. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Detection of the Forbidden SO a1 → X3 - Rovibronic Transition on Io at 1.7 m Detection of the forbidden so a1 → x3 - rovibronic transition on Io at 1.7 m . I...

    2002

  8. [18]

    APACrefauthors \ 2024

    dott_zenodo APACrefauthors Dott, A C. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Implicit solver for 1-D heat equation to calculate Io's surface temperature (assuming a homogenous subsurface structure)[Software]. Implicit solver for 1-d heat equation to calculate Io's surface temperature (assumi...

    2024 doi

  9. [19]

    , McGrath, M

    Feaga2009 APACrefauthors Feaga, L M. , McGrath, M. \ Feldman, P D. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Io's dayside SO _ 2 atmosphere Io's dayside SO _ 2 atmosphere . Icarus 201 2 570-584 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.029 APACrefDOI

    2009 doi

  10. [20]

    , Strobel, D F

    Feldman2000 APACrefauthors Feldman, P D. , Strobel, D F. , Moos, H W. , Retherford, K D. , Wolven, B C. , McGrath, M A. Ballester, G E. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Lyman- imaging of the SO _2 distribution on Io Lyman- imaging of the SO _2 distribution on Io . Geophysical Research ...

    doi

  11. [21]

    , Spencer, J R

    giles_2024 APACrefauthors Giles, R S. , Spencer, J R. , Tsang, C C. , Greathouse, T K. , Lellouch, E. \ L \'o pez-Valverde, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Seasonal and longitudinal variability in Io’s SO2 atmosphere from 22 years of IRTF/TEXES observations Seasonal and longitudi...

    2024

  12. [22]

    \ Roth , L

    Giono_Roth2021 APACrefauthors Giono , G. \ Roth , L. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Io's SO _ 2 atmosphere from HST Lyman- images: 1997 to 2018 Io's SO _ 2 atmosphere from HST Lyman- images: 1997 to 2018 . Icarus 359 114212 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114212 APACrefDOI

    2021

  13. [23]

    , Stevenson, D J

    guillot_2004 APACrefauthors Guillot, T. , Stevenson, D J. , Hubbard, W B. \ Saumon, D. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . The interior of Jupiter The interior of jupiter . Jupiter: The planet, satellites and magnetosphere 35 57

    2004

  14. [24]

    , Beggan, C D

    Hamilton2013 APACrefauthors Hamilton, C W. , Beggan, C D. , Still, S. , Beuthe, M. , Lopes, R M. , Williams, D A. Wright, W. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Spatial distribution of volcanoes on Io : Implications for tidal heating and magma ascent Spatial distribution of volcanoes on I...

    2013 doi

  15. [25]

    , Summers, M E

    ingersoll_1985 APACrefauthors Ingersoll, A P. , Summers, M E. \ Schlipf, S G. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Supersonic meteorology of Io: Sublimation-driven flow of SO2 Supersonic meteorology of io: Sublimation-driven flow of so2 . Icarus 64 3 375--390

    1985

  16. [26]

    , Spencer, J

    Jessup2004 APACrefauthors Jessup, K. , Spencer, J. , Ballester, G. , Vigel, M. , Howell, R. , Roesler, F. \ Yelle, R. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . The Atmospheric Signature of Io's Prometheus Plume and Anti- Jovian Hemisphere: Evidence for a Sublimation Atmosphere The atmospheric s...

    2004 doi

  17. [27]

    \ Spencer, J R

    Jessup2014 APACrefauthors Jessup, K L. \ Spencer, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Spatially resolved HST/STIS observations of Io’s dayside equatorial atmosphere Spatially resolved HST/STIS observations of Io’s dayside equatorial atmosphere . Icarus 248 165-189 . APACrefDOI doi:ht...

    2015 doi

  18. [28]

    , Fanale, F

    kerton_1996 APACrefauthors Kerton, C. , Fanale, F. \ Salvail, J. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . The state of SO2 on Io's surface The state of so2 on io's surface . Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 101 E3 7555--7563

    1996

  19. [29]

    , Tobie, G

    kervazo_2022 APACrefauthors Kervazo, M. , Tobie, G. , Choblet, G. , Dumoulin, C. \ B e hounkov \'a , M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Inferring Io’s interior from tidal monitoring Inferring io’s interior from tidal monitoring . Icarus 373 114737

    2022

  20. [30]

    , Jia, X

    Khurana_2011 APACrefauthors Khurana, K K. , Jia, X. , Kivelson, M G. , Nimmo, F. , Schubert, G. \ Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Evidence of a Global Magma Ocean in Io’s Interior Evidence of a global magma ocean in Io’s interior . Science 332 6034 1186-1189 . APACrefDOI...

    2011 doi

  21. [31]

    APACrefauthors \ 2005

    lellouch_2005 APACrefauthors Lellouch, E. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Io’s atmosphere and surface-atmosphere interactions Io’s atmosphere and surface-atmosphere interactions . Space science reviews 116 211--224

    2005

  22. [32]

    , Ali-Dib, M

    lellouch_2015 APACrefauthors Lellouch, E. , Ali-Dib, M. , Jessup, K L. , Smette, A. , K \"a ufl, H U. \ Marchis, F. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Detection and characterization of Io’s atmosphere from high-resolution 4- m spectroscopy Detection and characterization of io’s atmospher...

    2015

  23. [33]

    , Belton, M

    lellouch_1990 APACrefauthors Lellouch, E. , Belton, M. , de Pater, I. , Gulkis, S. \ Encrenaz, T. APACrefauthors \ 1990 . Io's atmosphere from microwave detection of SO _2 Io's atmosphere from microwave detection of SO _2 . Nature 346 6285 639--641 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi...

    1990 doi

  24. [34]

    , McGrath, M A

    lellouch2007 APACrefauthors Lellouch, E. , McGrath, M A. \ Jessup, K L. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Io’s atmosphere Io’s atmosphere . Io After Galileo 231--264

    2007

  25. [35]

    , Wilson, L

    Leone_2011 APACrefauthors Leone, G. , Wilson, L. \ Davies, A. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . The geothermal gradient of Io : Consequences for lithosphere structure and volcanic eruptive activity The geothermal gradient of Io : Consequences for lithosphere structure and volcanic erupt...

    2011 doi

  26. [36]

    , Steinke, T

    Matsyama_2022 APACrefauthors Matsuyama, I N. , Steinke, T. \ Nimmo, F. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Tidal Heating in Io Tidal Heating in Io . Elements 18 6 374-378 . APACrefDOI doi:10.2138/gselements.18.6.374 APACrefDOI

    2022 doi

  27. [37]

    , Keszthelyi, L

    McEwen2004 APACrefauthors McEwen, A. , Keszthelyi, L. , Lopes, R. , Schenk, P. \ Spencer, J. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . The lithosphere and surface of Io The lithosphere and surface of Io . Jupiter. The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere

    2004

  28. [38]

    , Belton, M J

    McGrath2000 APACrefauthors McGrath, M A. , Belton, M J. , Spencer, J R. \ Sartoretti, P. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy of Io's Pele Plume and SO _2 Atmosphere Spatially resolved spectroscopy of Io's Pele plume and SO _2 atmosphere . Icarus 146 2 476-4...

    2000

  29. [39]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    moore_2011 APACrefauthors Moore, C H. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Monte Carlo simulation of the Jovian plasma torus interaction with Io’s atmosphere and the resultant aurora during eclipse Monte carlo simulation of the jovian plasma torus interaction with io’s atmosphere and the r...

    2011

  30. [40]

    , Schubert, G

    moreno_1991 APACrefauthors Moreno, M A. , Schubert, G. , Baumgardner, J. , Kivelson, M G. \ Paige, D A. APACrefauthors \ 1991 . Io's volcanic and sublimation atmospheres Io's volcanic and sublimation atmospheres . Icarus 93 1 63--81

    1991

  31. [41]

    \ Telesco , C

    Morrison1980 APACrefauthors Morrison , D. \ Telesco , C. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . Io: Observational constraints on internal energy and thermophysics of the surface Io: Observational constraints on internal energy and thermophysics of the surface . Icarus 44 2 226-233 . APACrefD...

    1980 doi

  32. [42]

    , Gurwell, M A

    moullet_2010 APACrefauthors Moullet, A. , Gurwell, M A. , Lellouch, E. \ Moreno, R. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Simultaneous mapping of SO _2 , SO , NaCl in Io’s atmosphere with the Submillimeter Array Simultaneous mapping of SO _2 , SO , NaCl in Io’s atmosphere with the Submillim...

    2010 doi

  33. [43]

    \ Nelson, R M

    Nash1979 APACrefauthors Nash, D B. \ Nelson, R M. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Spectral evidence for sublimates and adsorbates on Io Spectral evidence for sublimates and adsorbates on Io . Nature 280 763--766 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/280763a0 APACrefDOI

    1979 doi

  34. [44]

    , Jacobson, R

    park_2025 APACrefauthors Park, R. , Jacobson, R. , Gomez Casajus, L. , Nimmo, F. , Ermakov, A. , Keane, J. others APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Io’s tidal response precludes a shallow magma ocean Io’s tidal response precludes a shallow magma ocean . Nature 638 8049 69--73

    2025

  35. [45]

    , Folkner, W M

    park_2021 APACrefauthors Park, R S. , Folkner, W M. , Williams, J G. \ Boggs, D H. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The JPL planetary and lunar ephemerides DE440 and DE441 The JPL planetary and lunar ephemerides DE440 and DE441 . The Astronomical Journal 161 3 105 . APACrefDOI doi:10.3...

    2021 doi

  36. [46]

    , Cassen, P

    Peale1979 APACrefauthors Peale, S. , Cassen, P. \ Reynolds, R. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Melting of Io by Tidal Dissipation Melting of Io by tidal dissipation . Science (New York, N.Y.) 203 892-4 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1126/science.203.4383.892 APACrefDOI

    1979 doi

  37. [47]

    , Spencer, J

    Rathbun2004 APACrefauthors Rathbun, J. , Spencer, J. , Tamppari, L. , Martin, T. , Barnard, L. \ Travis, L. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Mapping of Io's thermal radiation by the Galileo photopolarimeter–radiometer (PPR) instrument Mapping of Io's thermal radiation by the Galileo ph...

    2004 doi

  38. [48]

    , Roth, L

    retherford2019 APACrefauthors Retherford, K. , Roth, L. , Becker, T. , Feaga, L. , Tsang, C. , Jessup, K. \ Grava, C. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Io’s Atmosphere Silhouetted by Jupiter Ly- Io’s atmosphere silhouetted by jupiter ly- . The Astronomical Journal 158 4 154 . APACrefDOI...

    2019 doi

  39. [49]

    , Bl \"o cker, A

    roth_2025 APACrefauthors Roth, L. , Bl \"o cker, A. , de Kleer, K. , Goldstein, D. , Lellouch, E. , Saur, J. others APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Mass supply from Io to Jupiter’s magnetosphere Mass supply from io to jupiter’s magnetosphere . Space Science Reviews 221 1 13

    2025

  40. [50]

    , Boissier, J

    roth_2020 APACrefauthors Roth, L. , Boissier, J. , Moullet, A. , S \'a nchez-Monge, \'A . , de Kleer, K. , Yoneda, M. others APACrefauthors \ 2020 . An attempt to detect transient changes in Io’s SO _2 and NaCl atmosphere An attempt to detect transient changes in Io’s SO _2 an...

    2020

  41. [51]

    , Saur, J

    Roth_2017 APACrefauthors Roth, L. , Saur, J. , Retherford, K D. , Blöcker, A. , Strobel, D F. \ Feldman, P D. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Constraints on Io's interior from auroral spot oscillations Constraints on Io's interior from auroral spot oscillations . Journal of Geophysica...

    2017 doi

  42. [52]

    , Saur, J

    Roth2011 APACrefauthors Roth, L. , Saur, J. , Retherford, K D. , Strobel, D F. \ Spencer, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Simulation of Io’s auroral emission: Constraints on the atmosphere in eclipse Simulation of Io’s auroral emission: Constraints on the atmosphere in eclipse . ...

    2011 doi

  43. [53]

    , Neubauer, F M

    saur_2002 APACrefauthors Saur, J. , Neubauer, F M. , Strobel, D F. \ Summers, M E. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Interpretation of Galileo's Io plasma and field observations: I0, I24, and I27 flybys and close polar passes Interpretation of galileo's io plasma and field observations:...

    2002

  44. [54]

    \ Strobel, D F

    SaurStrobel2004 APACrefauthors Saur, J. \ Strobel, D F. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Relative contributions of sublimation and volcanoes to Io's atmosphere inferred from its plasma interaction during solar eclipse Relative contributions of sublimation and volcanoes to Io's atmosphe...

    2004 doi

  45. [55]

    , Spohn, T

    Segatz_1988 APACrefauthors Segatz, M. , Spohn, T. , Ross, M. \ Schubert, G. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Tidal dissipation, surface heat flow, and figure of viscoelastic models of Io Tidal dissipation, surface heat flow, and figure of viscoelastic models of Io . Icarus 75 2 187-206...

    1988 doi

  46. [56]

    , Dodd, C

    Simonelli2001 APACrefauthors Simonelli, D P. , Dodd, C. \ Veverka, J. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Regolith variations on Io: Implications for bolometric albedos Regolith variations on io: Implications for bolometric albedos . Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 106 E12 33241-...

    2001 doi

  47. [57]

    , West, R

    sinclair_2023 APACrefauthors Sinclair, J. , West, R. , Barbara, J. , Tao, C. , Orton, G. , Greathouse, T. Irwin, P. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Long-term variability of Jupiter’s northern auroral 8- m CH4 emissions Long-term variability of jupiter’s northern auroral 8- m ch4 emiss...

    2023

  48. [58]

    APACrefauthors \ 1967

    smoluchowski_1967 APACrefauthors Smoluchowski, R. APACrefauthors \ 1967 . Internal structure and energy emission of Jupiter Internal structure and energy emission of jupiter . Nature 215 5102 691--695

    1967

  49. [59]

    , Lellouch, E

    Spencer2005 APACrefauthors Spencer, J R. , Lellouch, E. , Richter, M J. , López-Valverde, M A. , Jessup, K L. , Greathouse, T K. \ Flaud, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Mid-infrared detection of large longitudinal asymmetries in Io's SO _ 2 atmosphere Mid-infrared detection of l...

    2005 doi

  50. [60]

    , van Sliedregt, D

    Steinke2020 APACrefauthors Steinke, T. , van Sliedregt, D. , Vilella, K. , van der Wal, W. \ Vermeersen, B. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Can a Combination of Convective and Magmatic Heat Transport in the Mantle Explain Io's Volcanic Pattern? Can a combination of convective and magm...

    2020 doi

  51. [61]

    \ Wolven, B C

    StrobelWolven2001 APACrefauthors Strobel, D F. \ Wolven, B C. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . The atmosphere of Io : Abundances and sources of sulfur dioxide and atomic hydrogen The atmosphere of Io : Abundances and sources of sulfur dioxide and atomic hydrogen . Astrophysics and Spac...

    2001 doi

  52. [62]

    , de Kleer, K

    thelen_2024 APACrefauthors Thelen, A E. , de Kleer, K. , Cordiner, M A. , de Pater, I. , Moullet, A. \ Luszcz-Cook, S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Io’s SO2 and NaCl Wind Fields from ALMA Io’s so2 and nacl wind fields from alma . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 978 1 L1

    2024

  53. [63]

    , Spencer, J R

    tsang_2015 APACrefauthors Tsang, C C. , Spencer, J R. \ Jessup, K L. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Non-detection of post-eclipse changes in Io’s Jupiter-facing atmosphere: Evidence for volcanic support? Non-detection of post-eclipse changes in io’s jupiter-facing atmosphere: Evidenc...

    2015

  54. [64]

    , Spencer , J R

    Tsang_2012 APACrefauthors Tsang , C C C. , Spencer , J R. , Lellouch , E. , L \'o pez-Valverde , M A. , Richter , M J. \ Greathouse , T K. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Io's atmosphere: Constraints on sublimation support from density variations on seasonal timescales using NASA IRTF...

    2012

  55. [65]

    , Spencer , J R

    Tsang2013 APACrefauthors Tsang , C C C. , Spencer , J R. , Lellouch , E. , L \'o pez-Valverde , M A. , Richter , M J. , Greathouse , T K. \ Roe , H. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Io s contracting atmosphere post 2011 perihelion: Further evidence for partial sublimation support on th...

    2013 doi

  56. [66]

    , Spencer, J R

    Tsang2016 APACrefauthors Tsang, C C C. , Spencer, J R. , Lellouch, E. , Lopez-Valverde, M A. \ Richter, M J. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The collapse of Io's primary atmosphere in Jupiter eclipse The collapse of Io's primary atmosphere in jupiter eclipse . Journal of Geophysical R...

    2016 doi

  57. [67]

    , Henning, W G

    Tyler_2015 APACrefauthors Tyler, R H. , Henning, W G. \ Hamilton, C W. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . TIDAL HEATING IN A MAGMA OCEAN WITHIN JUPITER’S MOON Io Tidal heating in a magma ocean within jupiter’s moon Io . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 218 2 22 . APACrefDOI do...

    2015 doi

  58. [68]

    , Davies, A G

    Veeder_2015 APACrefauthors Veeder, G J. , Davies, A G. , Matson, D L. , Johnson, T V. , Williams, D A. \ Radebaugh, J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Io: Heat flow from small volcanic features Io: Heat flow from small volcanic features . Icarus 245 379-410 . APACrefDOI doi:https://do...

    2015 doi

  59. [69]

    , Matson, D L

    veeder_1994 APACrefauthors Veeder, G J. , Matson, D L. , Johnson, T V. , Blaney, D L. \ Goguen, J D. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Io's heat flow from infrared radiometry: 1983--1993 Io's heat flow from infrared radiometry: 1983--1993 . Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 99 E8...

    1994

  60. [70]

    , Matson, D L

    Veeder2004_polar APACrefauthors Veeder, G J. , Matson, D L. , Johnson, T V. , Davies, A G. \ Blaney, D L. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . The polar contribution to the heat flow of Io The polar contribution to the heat flow of Io . Icarus 169 1 264-270 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org...

    2004 doi

  61. [71]

    APACrefauthors \ 1979

    Wagman_1979 APACrefauthors Wagman, D. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Sublimation pressure and enthalpy of sublimation of SO _2 , Chem Sublimation pressure and enthalpy of sublimation of SO _2 , chem . Thermodyn. Data Cent. Rep., Natl. Bur. of Standards, Washington, DC

    1979

  62. [72]

    , Gratiy, S

    Walker2010 APACrefauthors Walker, A. , Gratiy, S. , Goldstein, D. , Moore, C. , Varghese, P. , Trafton, L. Stewart, B. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . A comprehensive numerical simulation of Io’s sublimation-driven atmosphere A comprehensive numerical simulation of Io’s sublimation-dr...

    2010 doi

  63. [73]

    , Moore, C H

    Walker_2012 APACrefauthors Walker, A C. , Moore, C H. , Goldstein, D B. , Varghese, P L. \ Trafton, L M. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . A parametric study of Io’s thermophysical surface properties and subsequent numerical atmospheric simulations based on the best fit parameters A par...

    2012 doi

  64. [74]

    , Schenk , P M

    Williams2023IoBook APACrefauthors Williams , D A. , Schenk , P M. \ Radebaugh , J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 01 . Geology of Io Geology of Io . R M C. Lopes , K. de Kleer \ J T. Keane \ ( ), Io: A New View of Jupiter's Moon Io: A new view of jupiter's moon \ ( 468, 233-290). APACr...

    2023 doi

  65. [75]

    APACrefauthors \ 1995 1

    IoFactsheet APACrefauthors Williams, D R. APACrefauthors \ 1995 1 . Jovian Satellite Fact Sheet. Jovian satellite fact sheet. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/joviansatfact.html . Accessed 2023-09-05

    1995

  66. [76]

    APACrefauthors \ 1995 2

    JupiterFactsheet APACrefauthors Williams, D R. APACrefauthors \ 1995 2 . Jupiter Fact Sheet. Jupiter fact sheet. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/jupiterfact.html . Accessed 2023-09-05

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.