Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Tailoring Magnetic Properties of Zigzag Structured Thin Films via Interface Engineering and Columnar Nano-structuring

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In zigzag magnetic films, the junctions between oppositely tilted columns act as their own anisotropy source, rotating the easy axis as the bilayer count changes.

desk verdict A well-executed bilayer-scaling study with a genuinely useful CFA control, but the headline interface-induced anisotropy mechanism is underdetermined by the data as presented. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19577 v1 pith:CYNJLVOW submitted 2025-06-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sharanjeet Singh , Manisha Priyadarsini , Anup Kumar Bera , Smritiparna Ghosh , Varimalla R. Reddy , Sarathlal Koyiloth Vayalil , Benedikt Sochor , Dileep Kumar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords zigzagthinfilmssequentialobliqueangledepositioninterface-inducedshapeanisotropyuniaxialmagneticmagneto-opticalKerreffectgrazing-incidencesmall-angleX-rayscatteringcobaltcolumnarnanostructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Thin magnetic films grown as zigzags—alternately tilted columnar layers—are usually assumed to get their magnetic anisotropy from the shape of the columns. This paper argues that the junctions where oppositely tilted columns meet contribute their own anisotropy, one that points perpendicular to the column direction. By varying the number of junction-bearing bilayers in cobalt films, the authors show the magnetic easy axis can be rotated from perpendicular to the column direction, through an isotropic state, to parallel to it. A low-anisotropy cobalt-iron-aluminium alloy shows the same perpendicular preference while lacking crystallographic texture, isolating the interface contribution. If the claim holds, junction density becomes a practical dial for tuning magnetic films between isotropic and anisotropic response in spintronic and sensor applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the periodic interface-induced shape anisotropy: the dense, elongated junction regions between oppositely tilted columns are treated as high-aspect-ratio magnetic plates, with the long axis extending microns perpendicular to the column projection and the width only a few nanometres. These plates generate demagnetization-field anisotropy perpendicular to the column projection. Their spacing, about 3.5 nm between interfaces, is below the ~5 nm exchange length in cobalt, so adjacent columnar segments are exchange-coupled and the interfaces collectively influence magnetization reversal. The same plate picture also explains why S-OAD films beat conventional OAD: conventional columns have nanometre dimensions in both lateral directions, while the zigzag interfaces are nanometre-wide but micron-long, giving a much larger aspect ratio and hence stronger demagnetizing-field anisotropy.

What would settle it

Transmission-electron-microscopy cross-sections of a 3-bilayer cobalt zigzag film should reveal the proposed elongated, dense junction plates running perpendicular to the column projection; if no such connected high-density regions exist, or if inserting a nonmagnetic spacer at each junction leaves the perpendicular anisotropy unchanged, the interface-plate mechanism would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that periodic, dense interfaces inside zigzag columnar films act as a distinct magnetic-anisotropy source. In sequential oblique angle deposition each pair of oppositely tilted columns meets in a high-density junction; because columns are connected in one lateral direction and separated along the tilt, these junctions form elongated, rod- or plate-like regions whose long axis lies perpendicular to the column projection. The paper claims these regions generate an interface-induced shape anisotropy perpendicular to the column projection, which competes with the usual column-shape anisotropy and with texture-induced magneto-crystalline anisotropy. The competition explains the measured anisotropy crossover: with 3 bilayers the easy axis is perpendicular, with 4-5 bilayers the response is almost isotropic, and with 7 bilayers the easy axis shifts along the column projection. Structural support comes from a GISAXS Bragg-like peak at $q_z \approx 0.96\ \mathrm{nm}^{-1}$, giving a periodicity $d \approx 6.5\ \mathrm{nm}$ that matches the nominal bilayer thickness, and from 2DXRD showing progressively stronger (002) texture and anisotropic crystallite size along the column projection.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on the assumption that the dense, elongated interface regions at column junctions behave as coherent, high-aspect-ratio magnetic plates with their own shape anisotropy; the paper infers these plates from GISAXS periodicity and known column connectivity rather than from direct imaging, isolated magnetometry, or micromagnetic calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single deposition recipe can cover the full anisotropy range: increasing bilayer count moves the easy axis from perpendicular to the column projection, through an isotropic state, to along the projection.
  • The interface contribution is strong enough to counteract even cobalt's magneto-crystalline anisotropy, so anisotropy strength is not limited by intrinsic material constants alone.
  • The same zigzag geometry produces stronger uniaxial anisotropy than conventional OAD films because the dense interfaces run microns laterally while remaining nanometres wide, enlarging the effective demagnetizing-field anisotropy.
  • The CFA control shows that the mechanism persists without crystallographic texture, so the technique should transfer to materials with weak or no magneto-crystalline anisotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: If the junction plates are the true source, thinning the individual layers to pack more junctions per unit thickness should strengthen the perpendicular anisotropy; the 3- to 5-bilayer trend is consistent with this but is not itself a proof.
  • Beyond the paper: The CFA result implies the mechanism is largely independent of crystalline anisotropy, so the same zigzag geometry could impose a strong in-plane easy axis in Heusler, ferrite, or amorphous magnetic films where growth-induced texture is weak.
  • Beyond the paper: A decisive experiment would grow identical zigzag films with thin nonmagnetic spacers inserted at each junction; a vanishing of the perpendicular anisotropy would localize the effect to the junctions, while a persistence would point to purely dipolar or roughness origins.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic study of cobalt (Co) and Co2FeAl (CFA) zigzag thin films grown by Sequential Oblique Angle Deposition (S-OAD) with varying bilayer count, and claims the emergence of a novel interface-induced shape anisotropy component. Magnetometry (MOKE) shows an anisotropy crossover from an easy axis perpendicular to the column projection (3 bilayers) through an isotropic state (4-5 bilayers) to an easy axis parallel to the projection (7 bilayers). GISAXS reveals a periodic electron-density modulation with a period of about 6.5 nm, attributed to dense interfaces at the junctions of oppositely tilted columns. 2DXRD shows progressive in-plane (002) texturing along the column projection with increasing bilayer count. The authors attribute the perpendicular anisotropy to dipolar interactions and to a proposed interface-induced shape anisotropy from laterally elongated, dense interface regions acting as high-aspect-ratio magnetic plates, and argue that competition between this interface term and texture/crystallite-size-driven anisotropies explains the crossover. A 3-bilayer CFA zigzag film shows robust perpendicular UMA without crystallographic texture, which is presented as supporting evidence.

Significance. If the interface-induced anisotropy mechanism is correct, the work offers a new route to tune magnetic anisotropy in ferromagnetic thin films beyond conventional OAD, potentially useful for spintronic and sensor applications. The paper has notable strengths: the combination of MOKE, GISAXS, and 2DXRD on the same samples provides internally consistent structural and magnetic data; the CFA control addresses the role of magnetocrystalline anisotropy; and the GISAXS evidence for periodic bilayer interfaces is clearly presented. However, the central claim hinges on an unverified structural/magnetic entity (the interface 'plates'), and the data analysis is qualitative, with no anisotropy-energy constants, no micromagnetic modeling, and no direct imaging of the interfaces. The paper would be a valuable contribution if the mechanism is substantiated, but at present the evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive.

major comments (4)
  1. [§Results (Figs. 2-3) and Discussion] The bilayer-count series varies total film thickness simultaneously with the number of interfaces: the 3-, 4-, 5-, and 7-bilayer films have total thicknesses of 21, 28, 35, and 49 nm, respectively. The observed crossover of the easy axis from perpendicular to parallel to the column projection with increasing total thickness is exactly the known thickness-dependent behavior of conventional OAD films cited in the paper (refs. 17-19, 50-51). The paper provides no OAD control at 21, 28, 35, or 49 nm; the only OAD control (50 nm) is already in the parallel-easy-axis regime. Therefore the crossover cannot be uniquely attributed to interface-induced anisotropy, and the central claim requires either OAD thickness-series controls or a quantitative separation of thickness and interface-density effects (e.g., by micromagnetic modeling).
  2. [§GISAXS (Fig. 6) and Discussion] The GISAXS Bragg-like peak at qz ≈ 0.96 nm⁻¹ (d ≈ 6.5 nm) demonstrates a periodic electron-density modulation with a period matching the bilayer thickness, but it does not establish that the interface regions form the proposed 'dense, elongated, rod-like magnetic plates' with a lateral extent of microns and a width of only a few nanometers. No cross-sectional imaging (TEM/SEM), no quantitative GISAXS modeling of lateral correlation lengths, and no estimate of the demagnetizing factor of the putative interface plates is provided. Without such evidence, the physical entity invoked to explain the perpendicular anisotropy remains an assumption rather than a measured property.
  3. [§Discussion (CFA comparison, Fig. 10)] The CFA 3-bilayer versus CFA OAD comparison does not isolate the interface contribution. The 3-bilayer film has individual layer thicknesses of 3.5 nm, whereas the OAD CFA film has a column length of 21 nm, so the columnar shape anisotropy differs substantially between the two geometries: the short 3.5 nm columns have a much smaller aspect ratio than the 21 nm OAD columns. The observed stronger perpendicular UMA in the zigzag CFA film could therefore reflect the reduced columnar aspect ratio rather than the periodic interfaces. A control with matched individual-layer thickness but varied interface density, or a quantitative calculation of shape anisotropy for the actual column geometry, is required before the result can be assigned to the proposed interface-induced anisotropy.
  4. [§Discussion] The paper asserts that the interface-induced, dipolar, and crystalline anisotropies 'compete' and that the interface term is 'sufficiently strong to compete with, and in some cases counteract, even significant MCA-driven uniaxial anisotropy,' but no anisotropy constants, anisotropy fields, or energy densities are extracted from the MOKE data. The discussion remains entirely qualitative, and the proposed interface anisotropy is never quantified or modeled. For a claim of a new anisotropy source, the absence of any quantitative measure is a load-bearing gap that cannot be filled by correlation alone.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§Experimental] The phrase 'sample-to-detector distance of 225 m m' contains a typo; it should read '225 mm'.
  2. [§Fig. 7 caption and Table I] The caption of Fig. 7 states the error in the normalized area is ±0.03, whereas Table I reports an error of ±0.02 for the same quantity; this inconsistency should be reconciled.
  3. [§References] Reference 42 is cited as an arXiv preprint from 2023; if a peer-reviewed version exists, it should be cited instead, or the preprint status should be clearly indicated.
  4. [§Results (Fig. 2)] The description of the 4- and 5-bilayer samples as 'nearly isotropic' would benefit from a quantitative criterion (e.g., the remanence ratio or angular modulation amplitude) rather than relying solely on visual inspection of the polar plots.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the interface-induced anisotropy claim rests on new CFA-control and GISAXS evidence, not on a fitted parameter or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that periodic high-density interfaces between oppositely tilted columns generate an additional shape-anisotropy component. The derivation chain is experimental and interpretive rather than tautological: GISAXS shows a periodic electron-density modulation (Bragg-like peak at qz ~0.96 nm^-1, d ~6.5 nm) in the 7-bilayer zigzag film; MOKE shows an anisotropy crossover with bilayer count; GIXRD/2DXRD shows increasing (002) texture along the column projection; and the CFA 3-bilayer zigzag film, which lacks crystallographic texture, exhibits strong uniaxial anisotropy perpendicular to the column projection, whereas a conventional OAD CFA film of the same thickness shows easy-axis alignment along the column projection. No parameter is fitted to one subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. No equation defines the claimed interface-induced anisotropy in terms of the observed magnetization such that the conclusion is equivalent to its input. The authors do cite their own prior work [28] for the prior observation of unusual isotropic behavior and for interpreting the GISAXS features as dense interfaces, but the present paper adds directly measured GISAXS data and an independent CFA control that does not rely on that citation. Thus the self-citation is not load-bearing. Concerns that the bilayer series confounds interface density with total thickness, or that the dense-interface plate model is underconstrained without direct imaging or micromagnetic calculations, are scientific-risk or correctness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters were fitted to magnetic curves; structural parameters such as XRD areas, FWHM values, and GISAXS periodicity are measured and reported with quoted errors. The load-bearing assumptions are listed above. The invented entity is the interface-induced anisotropy component itself, which is inferred rather than directly observed.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption In obliquely deposited films, tilted columns induce shape anisotropy; for layer thickness below about 10 nm, columnar shape anisotropy is weak and dipolar intercolumnar interactions favor an easy axis perpendicular to the column projection.
    Invoked in the Discussion to explain the 3-bilayer behavior and to argue that dipolar interactions alone cannot overcome magnetocrystalline anisotropy; based on references [17-19,50,51].
  • ad hoc to paper Periodic interfaces between oppositely tilted columns are dense and laterally elongated, forming rod-like magnetic entities with high aspect ratio perpendicular to the column projection.
    Core mechanistic claim, inferred from the GISAXS Bragg-like peak and assumed intercolumnar connectivity; no direct magnetic imaging or calculation is provided.
  • domain assumption Co has strong hcp magnetocrystalline anisotropy and Co2FeAl has intrinsically low magnetocrystalline anisotropy.
    Used to isolate the interface component via the CFA control film; standard material property, cited from reference [21].
  • domain assumption Interfaces spaced about 3.5 nm apart, combined with an exchange length of about 5 nm, allow strong exchange coupling between adjacent columnar layers.
    Needed for the collective interface influence on magnetization reversal; the exchange length is taken from reference [19].
invented entities (1)
  • Interface-induced shape anisotropy component (dense elongated interface regions treated as magnetic plates)
    purpose: Explains the easy axis perpendicular to the column projection and the open hard-axis loops observed in zigzag films.
    Inferred from GISAXS and MOKE correlation; no micromagnetic simulation, direct imaging, or independent prediction outside this paper is provided. The CFA control is an internal test, not an external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tailoring Magnetic Properties of Zigzag Structured Thin Films via Interface Engineering and Columnar Nano-structuring." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CYNJLVOW

@misc{pith2026250619577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tailoring Magnetic Properties of Zigzag Structured Thin Films via Interface Engineering and Columnar Nano-structuring},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CYNJLVOW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19577}
}
read the original abstract

We report the emergence of a novel interface-induced shape anisotropy component in zigzag-structured thin films fabricated via Sequential Oblique Angle Deposition (S-OAD). In this study, we systematically investigate cobalt (Co) and Co2FeAl (CFA) thin films by varying column length, number of bilayers, and magneto-crystalline anisotropy (MCA) to explore how structural modulation affects magnetic behavior. Using magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements in conjunction with synchrotron-based grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) and 2D X-ray diffraction (2DXRD), we reveal that the interplay between interface-induced, shape, and crystalline anisotropies allows for a tunable magnetic response, ranging from isotropic to anisotropic behavior. The observed uniaxial magnetic anisotropy (UMA) exceeds that of conventional OAD films, while column merging is effectively suppressed through precise multilayer engineering. Structural analysis confirms that periodic, high-density interfaces at the junctions of oppositely tilted columns are central to this anisotropy control. These findings demonstrate that interface engineering and columnar nanostructuring within zigzag nanostructures offer a powerful route for tailoring magnetic properties in zigzag thin films, enabling their application in next-generation spintronic and magnetic sensor technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bera, A.S

    A.K. Bera, A.S. Dev, D. Kumar, Enhancing th e limit of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy induced by ion beam erosion, Appl Phys Lett 122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125851

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0125851 2023

  2. [2]

    Bera, M.S

    A.K. Bera, M.S. Jamal, A.G. Khanderao, S. Singh, D. Kumar, Harnessing ion beam erosion engineering for controlled self-assembly and tunable magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial films, J Appl Phys 136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0190202

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0190202 2024

  3. [3]

    Singh, A

    S. Singh, A. Kumar Bera, P. Gupta, M. Ranjan, V .R. Reddy, A. Chumakov, M. Schwartzkopf, D. Kumar, Enhanced magnetic anisotropy and its thermal stability in obliquely deposited Co -Film on the nanopatterned substrate, Appl Surf Sci 663 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160154

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Dev, A.K

    A.S. Dev, A.K. Bera, P. Gupta, V . Srihari, P . Pandit, M. Betker, M. Schwartzkopf, S. V . Roth, D. Kumar, Oblique angle deposited FeCo multilayered nanocolumnar structure: Magnetic anisotropy and its thermal stability in polycrystalline thin films, Appl Surf Sci 590 (2022) 153056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153056

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Bera, A.S

    A.K. Bera, A.S. Dev, M. Kuila, M. Ranjan, P. Pandit, M. Schwartzkopf, S. V . Roth, V .R. Reddy, D. Kumar, Morphology induced large magnetic anisotropy in obliquely grown nanostructured thin film on nanopatterned substrate, Appl Surf Sci 581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152377

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Hirohata, K

    A. Hirohata, K. Yamada, Y . Nakatani, I.-L. Prejbeanu, B. Diény, P. Pirro, B. Hillebrands, Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications, J Magn Magn Mater 509 (2020) 166711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166711

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Z. Wang, X. Wang, M. Li, Y . Gao, Z. Hu, T. Nan, X. Liang, H. Chen, J. Yang, S. Cash, N.X. Sun, Highly Sensitive Flexible Magnetic Sensor Based on Anisotropic Magnetoresistance Effect, Advanced Materials 28 (2016) 9370–9377. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201602910

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201602910 2016

  8. [8]

    Hamidi, M.M

    S.M. Hamidi, M.M. Tehranchi, Y . Chiniforoshan, The magneto-optical Co-based amorphous thin film as a magnetic field sensor, 2010

    work page 2010

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Hawkeye, M.J

    M.M. Hawkeye, M.J. Brett, Glancing angle deposition: Fabrication, properties, and applications of micro- and nanostructured thin films, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 25 (2007) 1317–1335. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2764082

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    Kijima, Y

    H. Kijima, Y . Zhang, N. Kobayashi, S. Ohnuma, H. Masumoto, High frequency soft magnetic performance on magnetically isotropic Co-Al-N films in external bias field, IEEE Trans Magn 48 (2012) 2910–2913. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2196683

    2012

  3. [11]

    Boudiar, S

    T. Boudiar, S. Capraro, T. Rouiller, M.F. Blanc -Mignon, B. Payet -Gervy, M. Le Berre, J.J. Rous seau, YIG thin films for magneto -optical and microwave applications, in: Physica Status Solidi C: Conferences, 2004: pp. 3347–3351. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200405453

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    Kijima, S

    H. Kijima, S. Ohnuma, H. Masumoto, High -frequency soft magnetic properties of i sotropic Co -Al-N Films, IEEE Trans Magn 47 (2011) 3928–3931

    2011

  5. [13]

    Kumar Bera, S

    A. Kumar Bera, S. Singh, M. Shahid Jamal, Z. Hussain, V .R. Reddy, D. Kumar, Growth and in -situ characterization of magnetic anisotropy of epitaxial Fe thin film on ion -sculpted Ag (001) substrate, J Magn Magn Mater 544 (2022) 168679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168679

    2022

  6. [14]

    Barranco, A

    A. Barranco, A. Borras, A.R. Gonzalez -Elipe, A. Palmero, Perspectives on oblique angle deposition of thin films: From fundamentals to devices, Prog Mater Sci 76 (2016) 59 –153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2015.06.003

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Sheraz Ahmad, W

    S. Sheraz Ahmad, W. He, J. Tang, Y . Sheng Zhang, B. Hu, J. Ye, Q. Gul, X.Q. Zhang, Z.H. Cheng, Manipulating magnetic anisotropies of Co/MgO(001) ultrathin films via oblique deposition, Chinese Physics B 25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/25/9/097501

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Q. Gul, W. He, Y . Li, R. Sun, N. Li, X. Yang, Y . Li, Z.Z. Gong, Z.K. Xie, X.Q. Zhang, Z.H. Cheng, Thickness dependent manipulation of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in Fe -thin films by oblique deposition, Chinese Physics B 27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/9/097504

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Solovev, A

    P.N. Solovev, A. V . Izotov, B.A. Belyaev, Microstructural and magnetic properties of thin obliquely deposited films: A simulation approach, J Magn Magn Mater 429 (2017) 45 –51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.012

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Quirós, L

    C. Quirós, L. Peverini, J. Díaz, A. Alija, C. Blanco, M. Vélez, O. Robach, E. Ziegler, J.M. Alameda, Asymmetric grazing incidence small angle x -ray scattering and anisotropic domain wall motion in obliquely grown nanocrystalline Co films, Nanotechnol ogy 25 (2014). https://do...

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Alameda, F

    J.M. Alameda, F. Carmona, F.H. Salas, L.M. Alvarez -Prado, R. Morales, G.T. Pérez, Effects of the initial stages of film growth on the magnetic anisotropy of obliquely -deposited cobalt thin films, J Magn Magn Mater 154 (1996) 249–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0...

    1996 doi

  12. [20]

    X. Xu, H. Huang, L. Jin, T. Wen, Y . Liao, X. Tang, Y . Li, Z. Zhong, Micromorphology and uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of oblique -sputtered Ni80F e20 films on periodically rippled Al2O3 substrates, Surfaces and Interfaces 37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.102694

    2023

  13. [21]

    Kaushik, R

    S. Kaushik, R. Raj, M. Priyadarsini, P. Gupta, G. Manna, V .R. Reddy, D. Kumar, Glancing Angle Deposition-Induced Asymmetric Growth and Magnetic Anisotropy in Co2FeAl/C60 Thin Films, ACS Appl Electron Mater 7 (2025) 3000–3009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.5c00179

    2025 doi

  14. [23]

    Solovev, A

    P.N. Solovev, A. V . Izotov, B.A. Belyaev, Numerical study of structural and magnetic properties of thin films obliquely deposited on rippled substrates, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac26fc

    2021 doi

  15. [24]

    Bukharia, P

    K. Bukharia, P. Karmakar, P. Pandit, A. Gupta, Study of magnetic nanowires of amorphous Co20Fe60B20 prepared by oblique angle deposition on nanorippled substrate, J Magn Magn Mater 529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167842

    2021

  16. [25]

    Patel, T

    S.P. Patel, T. Basu, M. Kumar, P. Mishra, T. Som, Microstructural, surface morphological, and magnetic properties of oblique angle deposited Co thin films on ion -beam fabricated self-organized Si substrates, Mater Lett 308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131099

    2022

  17. [26]

    Koyiloth Vayalil, A

    S. Koyiloth Vayalil, A. Koorikkat, A.K. Gopi, S. V . Roth, P.S. Anil Kumar, Tailoring of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in Permalloy thin films using nanorippled Si substrates, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab6d0d

    2020 doi

  18. [27]

    S. Ki, J. Dho, Strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in triangular wave -like ferromagnetic NiFe thin films, Appl Phys Lett 106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921784

    2015 doi

  19. [28]

    Singh, A.S

    S. Singh, A.S. Dev, M. Priyadarsini, P. Gupta, S.K. Vayalil, B. Sochor, V . Srihari, D. Kumar, Enhanced thermal stability of magnetic properties in cobalt thin films via zigzag nanostructuring, Appl Surf Sci 695 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162857

    2025

  20. [29]

    Savaloni, A

    H. Savaloni, A. Esfandiar, Fabrication, characterization and some applications of graded chiral zigzag shaped nano-sculptured silver thin films, Appl Surf Sci 257 (2011) 9425 –9434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.023

    2011 doi

  21. [30]

    Hawkeye, M.T

    M.M. Hawkeye, M.T. Taschuk, M.J. Brett, Wiley Series in Materials for Electronic & Optoelectronic Applications Glancing Angle Deposit ion of Thin Films Engineering the Nanoscale, First, WILEY , West Sussex, United Kingdom For, n.d

  22. [31]

    Yang, D.D

    Y .G. Yang, D.D. Mass, H.N.G. Wadley, Porosity control in zig -zag vapor -deposited films, Thin Solid Films 471 (2005) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.02.034

    2005 doi

  23. [32]

    Oliva-Ramírez, C

    M. Oliva-Ramírez, C. López-Santos, F. Yubero, A.R. González-Elipe, Nanostructural Analysis of Porous Oblique Angle Deposited (OAD) Multilayer Systems by Grazing -Incidence Small -Angle X -Ray Scattering, Adv Mater Interfaces 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201800530

    2018 doi

  24. [33]

    Potočnik, M

    J. Potočnik, M. Popović, B. Jokić, Z. Rakočević, Tailoring the structural and magnetic properties of Ni zigzag nanostructures using different deposition angles, Mater Res Bull 119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110540

    2019

  25. [34]

    Park, K.M.A

    Y .J. Park, K.M.A. Sobahan, C.K. Hwangbo, J. Ahn, Optical properties of TiO2 zigzag films prepared by using oblique angle deposition, Journal of the Korean Physical Society 56 (2010) 1378 –1381. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.56.1378

    2010 doi

  26. [35]

    Z. Gao, T. Zhang, Q. Wang, P. Heinz Mayrhofer, Nanostructured zig -zag γ-Mo2N thin films produced by glancing angle deposition for flexible symmetrical solid -state supercapacitors, Mater Des 225 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111432

    2023

  27. [36]

    Rodrigues, J

    M.S. Rodrigues, J. Borges, M. Proença, P . Pedrosa, N. Martin, K. Romanyuk, A.L. Kholkin, F. Vaz, Nanoplasmonic response of porous Au -TiO2 thin films prepared by oblique angle deposition, Nanotechnology 30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab068e

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    Bezuidenhout, M.J

    L.W. Bezuidenhout, M.J. Brett, Ultrathin layer chromatography on nanostructured thin films, J Chromatogr A 1183 (2008) 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.089

    2008 doi

  29. [38]

    Jiménez -Piqué, L

    E. Jiménez -Piqué, L. González -García, V .J. Rico, A.R. González -Elipe, Nanoindentation of nanocolumnar TiO2 thin films with single and stacked zig -zag layers, Thin Solid Films 550 (2014) 444 –

    2014

  30. [39]

    Lintymer, N

    J. Lintymer, N. Martin, J.M. Chappé, P. Delobelle, J. Takadoum, Influence of zigzag microstructure on mechanical and electrical properties of chromium multilayered thin films, Surf Coat Technol 180 –181 (2004) 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.10.027

    2004 doi

  31. [40]

    Buchta, M

    K. Buchta, M. Lewandowski, L. Bischoff, K. Synoradzki, M. Blaszyk, T. Tolinski, T. Luciński, Magnetization reversal in Co zigzag nanocolumns grown by glancing angle deposition, Thin Solid Films 568 (2014) 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.009

    2014 doi

  32. [41]

    Albrecht, R

    O. Albrecht, R. Zierold, C. Patzig, J. Bachmann, C. Sturm, B. Rheinländer, M. Grundmann, D. Görlitz, B. Rauschenbach, K. Nielsch, Tubular magnetic nanostructures based on glancing angle deposited templates and atomic layer deposition, Phys Status Solid i B Basic Res 247 (2010)...

    2010 doi

  33. [42]

    A.S. Dev, S. Singh, A.K. Bera, P. Gupta, V . Srihari, P. Pandit, M. Schwartzkopf, S. V Roth, D. Kumar, Significantly increased magnetic anisotropy in Co nano -columnar multilaye r structure via a unique sequential oblique-normal deposition approach, ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2302.0...

    2023 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Buffet, A

    A. Buffet, A. Rothkirch, R. Döhrmann, V . Körstgens, M.M. Abul Kashem, J. Perlich, G. Herzog, M. Schwartzkopf, R. Gehrke, P. Müller -Buschbaum, S. V . Roth, P03, the microfocus and nanofocus X-ray scattering (MiNaXS) beamline of the PETRA III storage ring: The microfocus endst...

    2012 doi

  35. [44]

    Gupta, P.N

    P. Gupta, P.N. Rao, M.K. S wami, A. Bhakar, S. Lal, S.R. Garg, C.K. Garg, P.K. Gauttam, S.R. Kane, V .K. Raghuwanshi, S.K. Rai, BL -02: A versatile X -ray scattering and diffraction beamline for engineering applications at Indus -2 synchrotron source, J Synchrotron Radiat 28 (...

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Pandey, H.K

    K.K. Pandey, H.K. Poswal, A.K. Mishra, A. Dwivedi, R. Vasanthi, N. Garg, S.M. Sharma, Energy - dispersive X -ray diffraction beamline at Indus -2 synchrotron source, Pramana - Journal of Physics 80 (2013) 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-012-0493-0

    2013 doi

  37. [46]

    Benecke, W

    G. Benecke, W. Wagermaier, C. Li, M. Schwartzkopf, G. Flucke, R. Hoerth, I. Zizak, M. Burghammer, E. Metwalli, P. Müller-Buschbaum, M. Trebbin, S. Förster, O. Paris, S. V Roth, P. Fratzl, A customizable software for fast reduction and analysis of large X -ray scattering data s...

    2014 doi

  38. [47]

    Priyadarsini, S

    M. Priyadarsini, S. Kaushik, A.S. Dev, S. Singh, P. Gupta, M. Schwartzkopf, S. V Roth, V .R. Reddy, D. Kumar, Evolution of Magnetic Properties with Structure and Morphology of Co/Alq3 Bilayer: A Thickness Dependent Study , J Supercond Nov Magn 37 (2024) 1713 –1721. https://doi...

    2024 doi

  39. [48]

    Liedke, M

    M.O. Liedke, M. Körner, K. Lenz, M. Fritzsche, M. Ranjan, A. Keller, E. Čižmár, S.A. Zvyagin, S. Facsko, K. Potzger, J. Lindner, J. Fassbender, Crossover in the su rface anisotropy contributions of ferromagnetic films on rippled Si surfaces, Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phy...

    2013 doi

  40. [49]

    A.K. Bera, D. Kumar, In -situ investigation of ion beam -induced crossover in uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of polycrystalline Fe films, ACS Appl Electron Mater 2 (2020) 3686 –3694. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.0c00720

    2020 doi

  41. [50]

    Q. Gul, W. He, Y . Li, R. Sun, N. Li, X. Yang, Y . Li, Z.-Z. Gong, Z. Xie, X. -Q. Zhang, Z. -H. Cheng, Thickness dependent manipulation of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in Fe -thin films by oblique deposition*, Chinese Physics B 27 (2018) 097504. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674 -1...

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    A.K. Bera, P. Gupta, D. Garai, A. Gupta, D. Kumar, Effect of surface morphology on magnetization dynamics of cobalt ultrathin films: An in -situ investigation, Applied Surface Science Advances 6 (2021) 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100124

    2021

  43. [52]

    Hurand, A

    S. Hurand, A. Corvisier, B. Lacroix, A.J. Santos, F. M audet, C. Dupeyrat, R.G. Roja, F.M. Morales, T. Girardeau, F. Paumier, Anisotropic optical properties of indium tin oxide thin films prepared by ion beam sputtering under oblique angle deposition, Appl Surf Sci 595 (2022)....

    2022

  44. [53]

    Maudet, B

    F. Maudet, B. Lacroix, A.J. Santos, F. Paumier, M. Paraillous, S. Hurand, A. Corvisier, C. Marsal, B. Giroire, C. Dupeyrat, R. García, F.M. Morales, T. Girardeau, Optical and nanostructural insights of oblique angle deposited layers appli ed for photonic coatings, Appl Surf Sc...

    2020

  45. [54]

    Tang, D.L

    F. Tang, D.L. Liu, D.X. Ye, Y .P. Zhao, T.M. Lu, G.C. Wang, A. Vijayaraghavan, Magnetic properties of Co nanocolumns fabricated by oblique -angle de position, J Appl Phys 93 (2003) 4194 –4200. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1558209

    2003 doi

  46. [55]

    Schlömann, Demagnetizing fields in thin magnetic films due to surface roughness, J Appl Phys 41 (1970) 1617–1622

    E. Schlömann, Demagnetizing fields in thin magnetic films due to surface roughness, J Appl Phys 41 (1970) 1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1659081

    1970 doi

  47. [449]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.022

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.