LLM-Driven Medical Document Analysis: Enhancing Trustworthy Pathology and Differential Diagnosis
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:L5PWJ3Z4record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Medical document analysis plays a crucial role in extracting essential clinical insights from unstructured healthcare records, supporting critical tasks such as differential diagnosis. Determining the most probable condition among overlapping symptoms requires precise evaluation and deep medical expertise. While recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced performance in medical document analysis, privacy concerns related to sensitive patient data limit the use of online LLMs services in clinical settings. To address these challenges, we propose a trustworthy medical document analysis platform that fine-tunes a LLaMA-v3 using low-rank adaptation, specifically optimized for differential diagnosis tasks. Our approach utilizes DDXPlus, the largest benchmark dataset for differential diagnosis, and demonstrates superior performance in pathology prediction and variable-length differential diagnosis compared to existing methods. The developed web-based platform allows users to submit their own unstructured medical documents and receive accurate, explainable diagnostic results. By incorporating advanced explainability techniques, the system ensures transparent and reliable predictions, fostering user trust and confidence. Extensive evaluations confirm that the proposed method surpasses current state-of-the-art models in predictive accuracy while offering practical utility in clinical settings. This work addresses the urgent need for reliable, explainable, and privacy-preserving artificial intelligence solutions, representing a significant advancement in intelligent medical document analysis for real-world healthcare applications. The code can be found at \href{https://github.com/leitro/Differential-Diagnosis-LoRA}{https://github.com/leitro/Differential-Diagnosis-LoRA}.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
UniReason-Med: A Shared Grounded Reasoning Interface for 2D-to-3D Transfer in Medical VQA
UniReason-Med introduces a unified framework for 2D and 3D medical VQA with shared grounded reasoning, trained on a 220K dataset, claiming that joint 2D+3D supervision improves 3D performance over 3D-only training.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.