pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.23318 · v1 · pith:VJFNMLZ4new · submitted 2025-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · physics.atm-clus

Tunable Field-Linked s-wave Interactions in Dipolar Fermi Mixtures

Jing-Lun Li , Georgios M. Koutentakis , Mateja Hrast , Mikhail Lemeshko , Andreas Schindewolf , Ragheed Alhyder This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 00:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atm-clus
keywords dipolar fermionss-wave resonancemicrowave shieldingspin mixturestetratomic statesquantum gasesfield-linked interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A universal s-wave resonance becomes accessible in dipolar fermionic spin mixtures while microwave shielding stays fully effective.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that spin mixtures of dipolar fermions support a tunable s-wave resonance controlled directly by microwave field parameters. This resonance appears without the need to weaken the shielding that suppresses inelastic losses. A universal description links the microwave settings to both the scattering length and the energies of weakly bound tetratomic states. If correct, the result supplies a practical route to stable, strongly interacting degenerate samples that combine s-wave pairing with long-range dipolar forces. It also indicates that evaporative cooling can reach the required degeneracy without new loss channels opening at the resonance.

Core claim

In a fermionic dipolar spin mixture under microwave shielding, a universal s-wave resonance is reached by tuning the microwave frequency and intensity; the resonance position and the associated tetratomic bound states are described by a single universal function of the microwave parameters, without compromising the shielding.

What carries the argument

Microwave-field parameters that tune the s-wave scattering length while preserving the shielding condition.

If this is right

  • Stable, strongly interacting dipolar spin mixtures become reachable in the degenerate regime.
  • Evaporative cooling to deep degeneracy is supported because shielding remains intact.
  • Both s-wave and dipolar interactions can be present simultaneously for studies of exotic quantum phases.
  • Weakly bound tetratomic states can be prepared and controlled with the same microwave fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same microwave tuning could be tested in bosonic dipolar mixtures to check whether the universal s-wave description carries over.
  • If the tetratomic states are long-lived, they may serve as building blocks for larger dipolar clusters.
  • The approach may extend to mixtures with different dipolar moments or to optical lattice settings where shielding and resonance tuning must coexist.

Load-bearing premise

The microwave shielding continues to suppress losses at the exact field values where the s-wave resonance is tuned.

What would settle it

Measurement of a sharp increase in two-body loss rate or departure from the predicted universal scattering length when the microwave parameters are set to the calculated resonance location.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23318 by Andreas Schindewolf, Georgios M. Koutentakis, Jing-Lun Li, Mateja Hrast, Mikhail Lemeshko, Ragheed Alhyder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Potential energy surface, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) scattering length versus microwave coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Left panel: elastic scattering rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin mixtures of degenerate fermions are a cornerstone of quantum many-body physics, enabling superfluidity, polarons, and rich spin dynamics through $s$-wave scattering resonances. Combining them with strong, long-range dipolar interactions provides highly flexible control schemes promising even more exotic quantum phases. Recently, microwave shielding gave access to spin-polarized degenerate samples of dipolar fermionic molecules, where tunable $p$-wave interactions were enabled by field-linked resonances available only by compromising the shielding. Here, we study the scattering properties of a fermionic dipolar spin mixture and show that a universal $s$-wave resonance is readily accessible without compromising the shielding. We develop a universal description of the tunable $s$-wave interaction and weakly bound tetratomic states based on the microwave-field parameters. The $s$-wave resonance paves the way to stable, controllable and strongly-interacting dipolar spin mixtures of deeply degenerate fermions and supports favorable conditions to reach this regime via evaporative cooling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies scattering in a fermionic dipolar spin mixture under microwave shielding. It claims that a universal s-wave resonance is accessible at microwave parameters (detuning and Rabi frequency) without compromising the shielding effectiveness, in contrast to prior p-wave field-linked resonances. A universal description of the tunable s-wave interaction and associated weakly bound tetratomic states is developed directly from the microwave-field parameters, enabling stable strongly interacting dipolar Fermi mixtures suitable for evaporative cooling to degeneracy.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the result would enable tunable s-wave interactions in shielded dipolar fermionic systems, opening routes to strongly interacting many-body states that combine s-wave pairing with long-range dipolar effects. The parameter-based universal description, if rigorously derived without ad-hoc fitting, would be a clear strength for experimental design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the s-wave resonance is 'readily accessible without compromising the shielding' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text provides no explicit verification that the resonance position maintains the assumed shielding factor or avoids new loss channels; this must be shown by direct comparison of loss rates or shielding efficiency at the relevant microwave parameters.
  2. [Universal description] Universal scattering description: The abstract states a universal description based on microwave parameters but supplies no derivation steps, error estimates, or benchmarks against full numerical scattering calculations, preventing assessment of whether the model remains valid precisely where the resonance occurs.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify notation for the microwave detuning and Rabi frequency when they are first introduced to avoid ambiguity in the universal mapping.
  2. Add a brief comparison table or figure panel contrasting the shielding factor at the s-wave resonance versus the p-wave cases from prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work's significance and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the s-wave resonance is 'readily accessible without compromising the shielding' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text provides no explicit verification that the resonance position maintains the assumed shielding factor or avoids new loss channels; this must be shown by direct comparison of loss rates or shielding efficiency at the relevant microwave parameters.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct comparison of shielding efficiency and loss rates evaluated at the microwave parameters of the s-wave resonance, including plots or tabulated values that confirm the shielding factor remains high and that no additional loss channels open. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Universal description] Universal scattering description: The abstract states a universal description based on microwave parameters but supplies no derivation steps, error estimates, or benchmarks against full numerical scattering calculations, preventing assessment of whether the model remains valid precisely where the resonance occurs.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for greater transparency in the universal description. The revised manuscript will include an expanded derivation section (or appendix) with the principal steps, quantitative error estimates for the approximations, and direct benchmarks of the universal model against full numerical scattering calculations evaluated at and near the resonance position. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: universal s-wave description derived from microwave parameters

full rationale

The paper derives its universal description of the tunable s-wave interaction and tetratomic states directly from the microwave-field parameters (detuning and Rabi frequency) in the shielded regime. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the accessibility of the resonance without compromising shielding is presented as an output of the scattering calculation rather than an input assumption. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated model assumptions and does not rename or smuggle prior results as new predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum scattering theory for dipolar molecules plus the assumption that microwave shielding parameters can be chosen to produce a field-linked s-wave resonance while preserving stability. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Microwave shielding suppresses short-range chemical reactions while allowing long-range dipolar and field-linked interactions to dominate scattering.
    Invoked to justify that the s-wave resonance remains accessible without loss channels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1141 out tokens · 33089 ms · 2026-05-22T00:52:19.278847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    scales of dipole-dipole inter- action. In the following, we shall show that the field-linked tetratomic binding energy Eb depends universally on the scattering length and R4, up to energies on the order of Eb ∼ − E4, allowing our universal framework to be ex- tended to estimate the field-linked tetratomic molecular binding energy. To characterise the bind...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Inguscio, W

    M. Inguscio, W. Ketterle, and C. Salomon, edi- tors. Proceedings, International School of Physics ”En- rico Fermi”, 164th Course, ”Ultra-cold Fermi Gases”: Varenna, Italy, June 20-30, 2006 , volume 164, Amster- dam, 2007. IOS Pr

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80:885–964, Jul 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Wolfgang Ketterle and N. J. Van Druten. Evaporative Cooling of Trapped Atoms. volume 37 of Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , pages 181–236. Academic Press, 1996. ISSN: 1049-250X

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases

    Cheng Chin, Rudolf Grimm, Paul Julienne, and Eite Tiesinga. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:1225–1286, Apr 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas

    Wilhelm Zwerger. The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas. Springer Science & Business Media, oct 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Anisotropic superfluid behavior of a dipolar bose-einstein condensate

    Matthias Wenzel, Fabian B¨ ottcher, Jan-Niklas Schmidt, Michael Eisenmann, Tim Langen, Tilman Pfau, and Igor Ferrier-Barbut. Anisotropic superfluid behavior of a dipolar bose-einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121:030401, Jul 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Quantum spin liquids: a review

    Lucile Savary and Leon Balents. Quantum spin liquids: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics , 80(1):016502, nov 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    J. P. Kestner, Bin Wang, Jay D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma. Prediction of a gapless topological haldane liquid phase in a one-dimensional cold polar molecular lattice. Phys. Rev. B, 83:174409, May 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases

    Lauriane Chomaz, Igor Ferrier-Barbut, Francesca Fer- laino, Bruno Laburthe-Tolra, Benjamin L Lev, and Tilman Pfau. Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases. Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(2):026401, February 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications

    Lincoln D Carr, David DeMille, Roman V Krems, and Jun Ye. Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications. New Journal of Physics , 11(5):055049, May 2009

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    N. R. Cooper and G. V. Shlyapnikov. Stable topological superfluid phase of ultracold polar fermionic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:155302, Oct 2009

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Shi, J.-N

    T. Shi, J.-N. Zhang, C.-P. Sun, and S. Yi. Singlet and triplet bardeen-cooper-schrieffer pairs in a gas of two-species fermionic polar molecules. Phys. Rev. A , 82:033623, Sep 2010

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular bose-einstein condensates

    Matthias Schmidt, Lucas Lassabli` ere, Goulven Qu´ em´ ener, and Tim Langen. Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular bose-einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:013235, Mar 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules

    Tim Langen, Giacomo Valtolina, Dajun Wang, and Jun Ye. Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules. Nature Physics, 20(5):702–712, May 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    G. M. Bruun and E. Taylor. Quantum phases of a two-dimensional dipolar fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:245301, Dec 2008

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Iskin and C

    M. Iskin and C. A. R. S´ a De Melo. Ultracold Heteronu- clear Molecules and Ferroelectric Superfluids. Physical Review Letters, 99(11):110402, September 2007

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller. Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases. Chemical Reviews , 112(9):5012–5061, September 2012. arXiv: 1207.1914 ISBN: 0009-2665. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Block, and Georg M

    Zhigang Wu, Jens K. Block, and Georg M. Bruun. Liq- uid crystal phases of two-dimensional dipolar gases and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless melting. Scientific Re- ports, 6(1):19038, January 2016. Publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Bijit Mukherjee and Jeremy M. Hutson. SU(N) sym- metry with ultracold alkali dimers: Weak dependence of scattering properties on hyperfine state. Physical Review Research, 7(1):013099, January 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules

    Bijit Mukherjee, Jeremy M Hutson, and Kaden R A Haz- zard. SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules. New Journal of Physics , 27(1):013013, January 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Santos, G

    L. Santos, G. V. Shlyapnikov, P. Zoller, and M. Lewen- stein. Bose-Einstein Condensation in Trapped Dipolar Gases. Physical Review Letters, 85(9):1791–1794, August 2000

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Lushnikov

    Pavel M. Lushnikov. Collapse of bose-einstein conden- sates with dipole-dipole interactions. Phys. Rev. A , 66:051601, Nov 2002

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. H. G. de Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Qu´ em´ ener, P. S. Julienne, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye. Quantum-State Controlled Chemical Reactions of Ultracold Potassium-Rubidium Molecules. Science, 327(5967):853–857, 2010

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Ruzic, and John L

    Michael Mayle, Goulven Qu´ em´ ener, Brandon P. Ruzic, and John L. Bohn. Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime. Physical Review A , 87(1):012709, January 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Zwierlein, Gerrit C

    Arthur Christianen, Martin W. Zwierlein, Gerrit C. Groenenboom, and Tijs Karman. Photoinduced Two- Body Loss of Ultracold Molecules. Physical Review Let- ters, 123(12):123402, September 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Nichols, David D

    Yu Liu, Ming-Guang Hu, Matthew A. Nichols, David D. Grimes, Tijs Karman, Hua Guo, and Kang-Kuen Ni. Photo-excitation of long-lived transient intermediates in ultracold reactions. Nature Physics , 16(11):1132–1136, November 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Gregory, Jacob A

    Philip D. Gregory, Jacob A. Blackmore, Sarah L. Brom- ley, and Simon L. Cornish. Loss of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules via Optical Excitation of Long-Lived Two- Body Collision Complexes. Physical Review Letters , 124(16):163402, April 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Ultracold Sticky Colli- sions: Theoretical and Experimental Status

    Roman Bause, Arthur Christianen, Andreas Schindewolf, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo. Ultracold Sticky Colli- sions: Theoretical and Experimental Status. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , 127(3):729–741, January 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Park, Yu-Kun Lu, Alan O

    Juliana J. Park, Yu-Kun Lu, Alan O. Jamison, Timur V. Tscherbul, and Wolfgang Ketterle. A Feshbach resonance in collisions between triplet ground-state molecules. Na- ture, 614(7946):54–58, February 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Effective potential and su- perfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules

    Fulin Deng, Xing-Yan Chen, Xin-Yu Luo, Wenxian Zhang, Su Yi, and Tao Shi. Effective potential and su- perfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:183001, May 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Huang, Y.-T

    S.-J. Huang, Y.-T. Hsu, H. Lee, Y.-C. Chen, A. G. Volos- niev, N. T. Zinner, and D.-W. Wang. Field-induced long- lived supermolecules. Physical Review A , 85(5):055601, May 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [34]

    Control- ling the scattering length of ultracold dipolar molecules

    Lucas Lassabli` ere and Goulven Qu´ em´ ener. Control- ling the scattering length of ultracold dipolar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:163402, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [35]

    Yu, Tijs Karman, Eunmi Chae, Kang-Kuen Ni, Wolfgang Ketterle, and John M

    Lo¨ ıc Anderegg, Sean Burchesky, Yicheng Bao, Scarlett S. Yu, Tijs Karman, Eunmi Chae, Kang-Kuen Ni, Wolfgang Ketterle, and John M. Doyle. Observation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules. Science, 373(6556):779– 782, August 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    Avdeenkov and John L

    Alexandr V. Avdeenkov and John L. Bohn. Collisional dynamics of ultracold OH molecules in an electrostatic field. Physical Review A, 66(5):052718, November 2002

    work page 2002

  36. [37]

    A. V. Avdeenkov and John L. Bohn. Linking Ultracold Polar Molecules. Physical Review Letters, 90(4):043006, January 2003

    work page 2003

  37. [38]

    A. V. Avdeenkov, D. C. E. Bortolotti, and J. L. Bohn. Field-linked states of ultracold polar molecules. Physical Review A, 69(1):012710, January 2004

    work page 2004

  38. [39]

    A. V. Gorshkov, P. Rabl, G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, P. Zoller, M. D. Lukin, and H. P. B¨ uchler. Suppression of inelastic collisions between polar molecules with a repulsive shield. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:073201, Aug 2008

    work page 2008

  39. [40]

    Tobias, Giacomo Valtolina, Goulven Qu´ em´ ener, and Jun Ye

    Kyle Matsuda, Luigi De Marco, Jun-Ru Li, William G. Tobias, Giacomo Valtolina, Goulven Qu´ em´ ener, and Jun Ye. Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields. Science, 370(6522):1324–1327, De- cember 2020. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page 2020

  40. [41]

    Field-linked resonances of polar molecules

    Xing-Yan Chen, Andreas Schindewolf, Sebastian Ep- pelt, Roman Bause, Marcel Duda, Shrestha Biswas, Tijs Karman, Timon Hilker, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo. Field-linked resonances of polar molecules. Nature, 614(7946):59–63, Feb 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    Hilker, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo

    Xing-Yan Chen, Shrestha Biswas, Sebastian Eppelt, An- dreas Schindewolf, Fulin Deng, Tao Shi, Su Yi, Timon A. Hilker, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo. Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules. Nature, 626(7998):283– 287, February 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [43]

    Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy

    Andreas Schindewolf, Roman Bause, Xing-Yan Chen, Marcel Duda, Tijs Karman, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo. Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy. Nature, 607(7920):677–681, Jul 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [44]

    Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields, January

    Fulin Deng, Xinyuan Hu, Wei-Jian Jin, Su Yi, and Tao Shi. Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields, January

    work page

  44. [45]

    arXiv:2501.05210 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv

  45. [46]

    Double microwave shielding, 2025

    Tijs Karman, Niccol` o Bigagli, Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Ian Stevenson, and Sebastian Will. Double microwave shielding, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [47]

    Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules

    Niccol` o Bigagli, Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Boris Bula- tovic, Tijs Karman, Ian Stevenson, and Sebastian Will. Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules. Nature, 631(8020):289–293, July 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [48]

    Tijs Karman and Jeremy M. Hutson. Microwave shield- ing of ultracold polar molecules with imperfectly circular polarization. Phys. Rev. A , 100:052704, Nov 2019

    work page 2019

  48. [49]

    Joy Dutta, Bijit Mukherjee, and Jeremy M. Hutson. Uni- versality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Res., 7:023164, May 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [50]

    See Supplemental Material for additional details

    work page

  50. [51]

    Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ınez, John L

    Maykel L. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ınez, John L. Bohn, and Goul- ven Qu´ em´ ener. Adimensional theory of shielding in ultra- cold collisions of dipolar rotors. Phys. Rev. A, 96:032718, Sep 2017

    work page 2017

  51. [52]

    Frye, John D

    Tijs Karman, Matthew D. Frye, John D. Reddel, and Jeremy M. Hutson. Near-threshold bound states of the dipole-dipole interaction. Phys. Rev. A , 98:062502, Dec 10 2018

    work page 2018

  52. [53]

    Quantization func- tion for potentials with −1/r4 tails

    Patrick Raab and Harald Friedrich. Quantization func- tion for potentials with −1/r4 tails. Phys. Rev. A , 80:052705, Nov 2009

    work page 2009

  53. [54]

    Multichannel quantum-defect the- ory for ultracold atom–ion collisions

    Zbigniew Idziaszek, Andrea Simoni, Tommaso Calarco, and Paul S Julienne. Multichannel quantum-defect the- ory for ultracold atom–ion collisions. New Journal of Physics, 13(8):083005, aug 2011

    work page 2011

  54. [55]

    Cavagnero, and C

    J L Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor. Quasi- universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases. New Journal of Physics , 11(5):055039, May 2009

    work page 2009

  55. [56]

    Reuben R. W. Wang and John L. Bohn. Anisotropic thermalization of dilute dipolar gases. Physical Review A, 103(6):063320, June 2021

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules

    Niccol` o Bigagli, Claire Warner, Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Ian Stevenson, Tijs Karman, and Sebastian Will. Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules. Nature Physics , 19(11):1579–1584, Septem- ber 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    Greene, and Sebastian Will

    Ian Stevenson, Shayamal Singh, Ahmed Elkamshishy, Niccol´ o Bigagli, Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Chris H. Greene, and Sebastian Will. Three-body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:263402, Dec 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [59]

    Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molec- ular Gas, May 2025

    Weijun Yuan, Siwei Zhang, Niccol` o Bigagli, Haneul Kwak, Claire Warner, Tijs Karman, Ian Stevenson, and Sebastian Will. Extreme Loss Suppression and Wide Tunability of Dipolar Interactions in an Ultracold Molec- ular Gas, May 2025. arXiv:2505.08773 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [60]

    B. D. Esry, Chris H. Greene, and H. Suno. Threshold laws for three-body recombination. Phys. Rev. A , 65:010705, Dec 2001

    work page 2001

  60. [61]

    Few-body physics in resonantly inter- acting ultracold quantum gases

    Jos´ e P D’Incao. Few-body physics in resonantly inter- acting ultracold quantum gases. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 51(4):043001, jan 2018

    work page 2018

  61. [62]

    Bijit Mukherjee and Jeremy M. Hutson. Controlling col- lisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields. Physical Review Re- search, 6(1):013145, February 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [63]

    Reuben R. W. Wang, Shrestha Biswas, Sebastian Eppelt, Fulin Deng, Xin-Yu Luo, and John L. Bohn. Simulations of evaporation to deep Fermi degeneracy in microwave- shielded molecules. Physical Review A , 110(4):043309, October 2024

    work page 2024

  63. [64]

    Haussmann, W

    R. Haussmann, W. Rantner, S. Cerrito, and W. Zwerger. Thermodynamics of the bcs-bec crossover. Phys. Rev. A, 75:023610, Feb 2007

    work page 2007

  64. [65]

    Julienne

    Micha l Tomza, Krzysztof Jachymski, Rene Gerritsma, Antonio Negretti, Tommaso Calarco, Zbigniew Idziaszek, and Paul S. Julienne. Cold hybrid ion-atom systems.Rev. Mod. Phys., 91:035001, Jul 2019

    work page 2019

  65. [66]

    J. P. Shaffer, S. T. Rittenhouse, and H. R. Sadegh- pour. Ultracold Rydberg molecules. Nature Communica- tions, 9(1):1965, May 2018. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 1965

  66. [67]

    Lepers, R

    M. Lepers, R. Vexiau, M. Aymar, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, and O. Dulieu. Long-range interactions between polar alkali-metal diatoms in external electric fields.Phys. Rev. A, 88:032709, Sep 2013

    work page 2013

  67. [68]

    Tijs Karman and Jeremy M. Hutson. Microwave shield- ing of ultracold polar molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121:163401, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  68. [69]

    Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules

    Gaoren Wang and Goulven Qu´ em´ ener. Tuning ultracold collisions of excited rotational dipolar molecules. New Journal of Physics , 17(3):035015, mar 2015

    work page 2015

  69. [70]

    D. E. Manolopoulos. An improved log derivative method for inelastic scattering. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 85(11):6425–6429, 12 1986

    work page 1986

  70. [71]

    Will, Jee Woo Park, Zoe Z

    Sebastian A. Will, Jee Woo Park, Zoe Z. Yan, Huanqian Loh, and Martin W. Zwierlein. Coherent microwave con- trol of ultracold 23Na40K molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116:225306, Jun 2016

    work page 2016

  71. [72]

    1 + |δ| Ω 2#−1 , (9) B = d4 1120π2ϵ2 0Ω

    Bo Gao. Quantum-defect theory for −1/r4-type interac- tions. Phys. Rev. A , 88:022701, Aug 2013. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS J. Li thanks Gaoren Wang for valuable discussions on the absorbing boundary condition. G. M. K. thanks P. Giannakeas for fruitful discussions during the initial stages of this study. G. M. K. was funded by the Aus- trian Science Fund (FWF) [10....

    work page doi:10.55776/f1004 2013

  72. [73]

    The parameter γsr2 enters at the order of c2κ2 in the expansion, whereas the con- tributions from the parameters in F high 4 (E) only arise beginning at the c5κ5 order. By solving αs = 1/κ + c0 + c1κ + c2κ2 (28) and expanding the solution in terms of 1 /αs, we get Eb = − ℏ2κ2 m (29) = − ℏ2 m 1 α2s + 2c0 α3s + 3c2 0 + 2c1 α4s +4c3 0 + 8c0c1 + 2c2 α5s + · ·...

    work page 2000