Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Differentiation of Site-Specific Symmetry Breaking Orders in Y$_{1-x}$Pr$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+y}$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that PrBa2Cu3O7 and its Y-substituted films host two distinct orders with nearly identical wavevectors, a Pr-site structural superlattice and an in-plane copper-site charge density wave, and concludes that the Pr-site…

desk verdict A convincing site-resolved separation of two nearly degenerate 1/3 orders in Pr-doped YBCO, with a structural story for Q1 that is honest but under-built and a causation claim that outruns the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20640 v1 pith:532JQOWI submitted 2025-07-28 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords cupratesuperconductorschargedensitywaveresonantelasticx-rayscatteringPrBa2Cu3O7YBCOsuperlatticeordercompetitionthinfilms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Y$_{1-x}$Pr$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+y}$ hosts two distinct ordering phenomena whose in-plane wavevectors are almost the same, and this paper separates them with site-sensitive resonant x-ray scattering. One order, $Q_1=(\delta_1,0,0)$, is a temperature-independent, long-range lattice modulation that resonates at the praseodymium and out-of-plane copper sites; it is assigned to a Pr-related superlattice. The other, $Q_2=(\delta_2,0,1/2)$, is a short-range, temperature-dependent modulation resonating at the in-plane copper site and is identified with the charge-density-wave order seen in YBCO. The paper concludes that the translational symmetry breaking at the Pr site is detrimental to superconducting pairing, offering a structural clue to why PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ is the non-superconducting anomaly of the 123 family.

What carries the argument

The central tool is site-sensitive resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS) tuned to the Cu-$L$ and Pr-$M$ absorption edges, combined with high-energy grazing-incidence x-ray diffraction. REXS distinguishes the two orders by the atomic site at which the reflection gains intensity: $Q_1$ lights up at Pr and out-of-plane Cu, $Q_2$ at in-plane Cu. The comparisons that carry the identification are temperature dependence, correlation length, and the incommensurability sign, $\delta_1 > 1/3$ versus $\delta_2 < 1/3$. Symmetry analysis of the allowed distortion modes for the $Q_1$ ordering vector is used to argue that a Pr in-plane displacement is the structural mode behind the superlattice.

What would settle it

A structure refinement of PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ at the $Q_1$ reflection that finds no Pr or out-of-plane Cu displacement modes of the allowed symmetry would falsify the superlattice interpretation, as would a magnetic-field or doping-induced change in $\delta_1$ that cannot be traced to the lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that two reflections with nearly identical in-plane periodicity, $\delta_1 \approx \delta_2 \approx 1/3$, come from different physical orders. In PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ and Y$_{0.7}$Pr$_{0.3}$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.67}$, a reflection at $Q_1=(\delta_1,0,0)$ with $\delta_1 > 1/3$ is temperature independent, resolution-limited, and enhanced at both the Pr and out-of-plane Cu resonances, so it is interpreted as a structural superlattice tied to Pr. In Y$_{0.7}$Pr$_{0.3}$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.67}$ a second reflection at $Q_2=(\delta_2,0,1/2)$ with $\delta_2 = 0.325(1) < 1/3$ is short-range, temperature dependent, and resonates at the in-plane Cu site, matching the charge-density-wave order of YBCO. Because the two orders differ in atomic site, temperature dependence, correlation length, and the sign of their deviation from $1/3$, they cannot be the same ordering dressed in different stackings. From this, the paper draws the conclusion that the Pr-site structural order, not a second electronic charge order, is what suppresses pairing in PBCO.

Load-bearing premise

The central distinction rests on the premise that a reflection which is temperature independent and resonates at the Pr and out-of-plane copper sites is a lattice superlattice, not an electronic charge order; the structure refinement that would prove this is deferred.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $Q_2$ reflection is a genuine charge-density-wave order of the YBCO type, with the same in-plane ordering vector and a predominantly two-dimensional character.
  • The $Q_1$ superlattice appears across the studied $(x,y)$ range, strongest in PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ and weakest in Y$_{0.7}$Pr$_{0.3}$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$, indicating that Pr substitution generically creates a $1/3$ superlattice susceptibility.
  • The Pr-site translational symmetry breaking is identified as the direct structural correlate of the PBCO anomaly and as unfavorable for superconducting pairing.
  • The hole-doping analysis implies only a small fraction ($p_{\mathrm{FR}} \approx 0.02$) of holes enters the Pr $4f$--O $2p$ hybridized state, and these holes do not participate in the charge-order modulation.
  • The reduced $T_c$ of Y$_{0.7}$Pr$_{0.3}$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.67}$ combined with a higher charge-order onset is read as phase competition, similar to other cuprates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the structural-superlattice reading is right, a full structure refinement of PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ should reveal static Pr displacement modes at the $Q_1$ wavevector; their absence would force the alternative electronic-order reading.
  • The same site-resonance separation could be applied to other 123-family films with different rare-earth substitutions to test whether the $1/3$ superlattice is specific to Pr or generic to $4f$ hybridization.
  • Because $Q_1$ is long-range and temperature-independent, its symmetry breaking may act as a quenched structural background that sets boundary conditions for the charge density wave and superconductivity, rather than as a fluctuating competing order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined grazing-incidence x-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) and resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS) study of PrBa2Cu3O7 and Y1-xPrxBa2Cu3O6+y thin films, identifying two quasi-commensurate ordering vectors Q1=(δ1,0,0) and Q2=(δ2,0,1/2) with δ1≈δ2≈1/3. The authors argue that Q2 is a charge-density wave analogous to the CDW in YBCO, while Q1 is a Pr-related super-lattice structure, based on different resonance sites, temperature dependences, correlation lengths, and slightly different in-plane wavevectors. They conclude that translational symmetry breaking at the Pr site is detrimental to superconducting pairing.

Significance. If the structural interpretation of Q1 is correct, the paper provides a direct structural correlate for the anomalous insulating behavior of PrBa2Cu3O7 and demonstrates the power of site-sensitive REXS to differentiate nearly degenerate orderings within a single material. The experimental dataset is careful, and the within-sample differentiation of Q1 and Q2 is convincing: different resonance sites, different temperature dependences, and different correlation lengths are clearly established. However, the significance of the central conclusion is contingent on the structural (as opposed to electronic) nature of Q1, which is not proven by the present data. The paper does not deliver a structure refinement for Q1 and explicitly defers it to a future communication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II (Discussion), paragraph beginning 'Next, we turn to the Q1-order'] The identification of Q1 as a structural super-lattice is load-bearing for the paper's final conclusion, but it is not conclusively established. The authors state that structure refinement 'is, in principle, possible' but 'leave such a detailed analysis for a future communication,' and they concede that 'the causal relation between Pr-site distortions and mixed Pr-valence from oxygen hybridization remains to be clarified.' The reported evidence (resonance at Pr and out-of-plane Cu, temperature independence, resolution-limited width) is consistent with a static valence or charge ordering localized at the Pr sites, which could also involve local ionic displacements. Without a refined structural model (e.g., atomic displacement refinement from the available 3D scattering volume), the central contrast between a charge-density wave and a super-lattice structure is not fully supported. Please either provide the refinement for at least PrBa2Cu3O7 or substantially soften the conclusions to present Q1 as a lattice modulation whose structural versus electronic origin remains to be determined.
  2. [Section II (Discussion), concluding paragraph] The causal conclusion that 'translational symmetry breaking at the Pr-site is detrimental to superconducting pairing' is stronger than the correlation data support. The study contains only two Pr concentrations (x=0.3 and x=1) and Q1 is present in superconducting Y0.7Pr0.3Ba2Cu3O6.67 and Y0.7Pr0.3Ba2Cu3O7 with Tc of 28-53 K, while the non-superconducting PrBa2Cu3O7 has the strongest Q1. This correlation is suggestive but does not prove causation. I recommend tempering the final statement or adding a testable prediction (e.g., controlled variation of Q1 strength by external pressure or further Pr doping) to support the causal link.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, 'Gracing-incidence x-ray diffraction'] The section heading contains a typo: 'Gracing' should be 'Grazing'.
  2. [Methods, 'Film growth'] There is an inconsistency in film thickness: the text states that Pr-YBCO films have a thickness of 120 nm, but the table lists Y0.7Pr0.3Ba2Cu3O7 with d=60 nm. Please clarify which thickness is correct.
  3. [Author Contributions] The Author Contributions section contains the text 'Quickly written. Can be missing contributions and contributions may come.' This appears to be an accidental placeholder and should be replaced with a complete, professional author contributions statement.
  4. [Section II (Discussion), paragraph on charge density wave] The conclusion that only a small fraction of holes (pFR=0.02) enters the Pr 4f-FR state is presented without error bars or a sensitivity analysis of the doping estimate pZR≈0.10. Please provide a more explicit uncertainty estimate or a caveat that this is a rough estimate.
  5. [Figure 3(d) and Section II (Discussion)] The statement that the in-plane periodicity shows a 'minute discrepancy' between δ1=0.3365(4) and δ2=0.325(1) seems to understate the difference of about 3.5%. The wording 'minute' may be misleading; consider using 'small but significant'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central site-specific differentiation rests on direct REXS observations, while the structural interpretation of Q1 is deferred rather than derived from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical and does not reduce to its inputs. Two distinct reflections, Q1 = (delta1,0,0) and Q2 = (delta2,0,1/2), are separated by site-resolved resonance (Pr and out-of-plane Cu vs in-plane Cu), temperature dependence, correlation length, and minute incommensurability differences. These are independently measured properties, not parameters fitted and then repredicted. The classification of Q2 as a YBCO-like CDW is supported by its in-plane Cu resonance, finite correlation length, T-dependent intensity, and L-independence; this identification does not depend on a self-citation. The super-lattice assignment of Q1 is an interpretation, not a circular derivation, and the paper explicitly defers the decisive structure refinement ('We leave such a detailed analysis for a future communication') and concedes that 'the causal relation between Pr-site distortions and mixed Pr-valence from oxygen hybridization remains to be clarified.' Those are missing-support limitations, not circular steps. The hole-doping estimate pZR ~ 0.10 is read from published CDW incommensurability calibrations, some of which involve coauthors, but this is non-load-bearing for the central site-specific distinction and is an external empirical calibration, not a self-referential theorem. No uniqueness claim, ansatz, or fitted input is invoked to force the conclusion, so the paper is self-contained against its own measurements and exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to produce the central result; the wavevectors and temperature dependences are measured. The interpretation depends on the Fehrenbacher-Rice hole-partition model, the Liang doping calibration, the REXS site-selectivity assumption, and the temperature-independence-as-structural heuristic. The Q1 super-lattice distortion modes are inferred, not refined.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Fehrenbacher-Rice model of Pr-4f and O-2p hybridization with mixed Pr valence.
    Invoked in Section II to partition holes into the CuO2 planes (pZR) and the Pr-4f state (pFR) and to interpret the reduced Tc; cited from Ref. 6 but not independently established here.
  • domain assumption Liang et al. calibration relating oxygen content y to hole doping p in YBCO.
    Used in Section II to assign p = 0.12 for y = 0.67 and to estimate pZR from the CDW incommensurability.
  • domain assumption REXS resonance at an absorption edge identifies the atomic site participating in the ordering.
    Central to the site differentiation of Q1 and Q2; standard assumption in resonant scattering, not proven within this paper.
  • domain assumption Temperature-independent diffraction intensity indicates a structural super-lattice rather than an electronic order.
    Used in Section II to classify Q1 as structural and Q2 as electronic; a heuristic that is reasonable but not rigorously established for this system.
  • ad hoc to paper A Pr substitution every third unit cell (x=0.3) or an intrinsic Pr distortion in PrBa2Cu3O7 produces the observed Q1 peaks.
    This is the proposed explanation for Q1; the paper explicitly defers the structure refinement to a future communication, so the distortion modes are not directly evidenced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differentiation of Site-Specific Symmetry Breaking Orders in Y$_{1-x}$Pr$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+y}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/532JQOWI

@misc{pith2026250720640,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differentiation of Site-Specific Symmetry Breaking Orders in Y$_1-x$Pr$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_6+y$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/532JQOWI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20640}
}
abstract

Solid matter is classified through symmetry of ordering phenomena. Experimentally, this approach is straightforward, except when distinct orderings occur with identical or almost identical symmetry breaking. Here we show that the cuprate system Y$_{1-x}$Pr$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6+y}$ hosts two distinct orderings with almost identical translational symmetry breaking. Only when applying site-sensitive resonant elastic x-ray scattering (REXS), charge ordering can be conclusively differentiated from a super-lattice structure. These two orderings occur with almost the same in-plane symmetry but manifest at different atomic sites and display different temperature dependence. Differentiating these orders provides an important clue to the anomalous behavior of PrBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ within the 123-series of high-temperature superconductors. We conclude that the symmetry breaking at the Pr-site is unfavorable for superconducting pairing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20640 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. , (H, K, 0) and (H, 1, L) scattering planes are ob￾tained by slicing the three-dimensional reciprocal scatter￾ing volume. The most intense reflections are associated with fundamental Bragg peaks at QB = (H, K, L) with integer Miller indices. Furthermore, quasi-commensurate weaker reflections are found at Q1 = QB + τ1 with τ1 ≈ (±δ1, 0, 0) and (0, ±δ1, 0) where δ1 ⪆ 1/3. These quasi-commensurate reflections are two t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charge order in the Pr substituted YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$ from high-field Hall effect measurements

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hall measurements on Pr-substituted YBCO show the same sign-reversing Hall coefficient as pure YBCO, implying charge-order-driven Fermi-surface reconstruction and matched phase diagrams across the two doping routes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bergen , author R

    author author A. Bergen , author R. Andersen , author M. Bauer , author H. Boy , author M. t. \ Brake , author P. Brutsaert , author C. Bührer , author M. Dhallé , author J. Hansen , author H. ten Kate , author J. Kellers , author J. Krause , author E. Krooshoop , author C. Kruse , author H. Kylling , author M. Pilas , author H. Pütz , author A. Rebsdorf ...

  2. [2]

    Li , author M

    author author X. Li , author M. Ainslie , author D. Song , author W. Yang , \ and\ author R. Macián-Juan ,\ 10.1088/1361-6668/ada9d2 journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ volume 38 ,\ pages 033001 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Dong , author D

    author author F. Dong , author D. Park , author P. Sadde , author J. Bascuñán , \ and\ author Y. Iwasa ,\ 10.1088/1361-6668/adb4a9 journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ volume 38 ,\ pages 035016 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    Mukoyama , author A

    author author S. Mukoyama , author A. Nakai , author H. Sakamoto , author S. Matsumoto , author G. Nishijima , author M. Hamada , author K. Saito , \ and\ author Y. Miyoshi ,\ 10.1088/1742-6596/1054/1/012038 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume 1054 ,\ pages 012038 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    Kiss \ and\ author F

    author author A. Kiss \ and\ author F. Simon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174413 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 82 ,\ pages 174413 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    Fehrenbacher \ and\ author T

    author author R. Fehrenbacher \ and\ author T. M. \ Rice ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3471 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 70 ,\ pages 3471 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Merz , author N

    author author M. Merz , author N. Nücker , author E. Pellegrin , author P. Schweiss , author S. Schuppler , author M. Kielwein , author M. Knupfer , author M. S. \ Golden , author J. Fink , author C. T. \ Chen , author V. Chakarian , author Y. U. \ Idzerda , \ and\ author A. Erb ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.9160 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 55 ,\ ...

  8. [8]

    Soderholm , author C.-K

    author author L. Soderholm , author C.-K. \ Loong , author G. L. \ Goodman , \ and\ author B. D. \ Dabrowski ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.7923 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 43 ,\ pages 7923 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Ghiringhelli , author M

    author author G. Ghiringhelli , author M. L. \ Tacon , author M. Minola , author S. Blanco-Canosa , author C. Mazzoli , author N. B. \ Brookes , author G. M. D. \ Luca , author A. Frano , author D. G. \ Hawthorn , author F. He , author T. Loew , author M. M. \ Sala , author D....

  2. [10]

    Chang , author E

    author author J. Chang , author E. Blackburn , author A. T. \ Holmes , author N. B. \ Christensen , author J. Larsen , author J. Mesot , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author A. Watenphul , author M. v. Zimmermann , author E. M. \ Forgan , \ and...

  3. [11]

    author author A. J. \ Achkar , author R. Sutarto , author X. Mao , author F. He , author A. Frano , author S. Blanco-Canosa , author M. L. \ Tacon , author G. Ghiringhelli , author L. Braicovich , author M. Minola , author M. M. \ Sala , author C. Mazzoli , author R. Liang , a...

  4. [12]

    Blackburn , author J

    author author E. Blackburn , author J. Chang , author M. Hücker , author A. T. \ Holmes , author N. B. \ Christensen , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author M. v. \ Zimmermann , author E. M. \ Forgan , \ and\ author S. M. \ Hayden ,\ https://jou...

  5. [13]

    Hücker , author N

    author author M. Hücker , author N. B. \ Christensen , author A. T. \ Holmes , author E. Blackburn , author E. M. \ Forgan , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author O. Gutowski , author M. v. \ Zimmermann , author S. M. \ Hayden , \ and\ author J....

  6. [14]

    Choi , author O

    author author J. Choi , author O. Ivashko , author E. Blackburn , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author A. T. \ Holmes , author N. B. \ Christensen , author M. Hücker , author S. Gerber , author O. Gutowski , author U. Rütt , author M. v. \ Zimm...

  7. [15]

    Vinograd , author S

    author author I. Vinograd , author S. M. \ Souliou , author A.-A. \ Haghighirad , author T. Lacmann , author Y. Caplan , author M. Frachet , author M. Merz , author G. Garbarino , author Y. Liu , author S. Nakata , author K. Ishida , author H. M. L. \ Noad , author M. Minola ,...

  8. [16]

    Blanco-Canosa , author A

    author author S. Blanco-Canosa , author A. Frano , author T. Loew , author Y. Lu , author J. Porras , author G. Ghiringhelli , author M. Minola , author C. Mazzoli , author L. Braicovich , author E. Schierle , author E. Weschke , author M. Le Tacon , \ and\ author B. Keimer ,\...

  9. [17]

    Blanco-Canosa , author A

    author author S. Blanco-Canosa , author A. Frano , author E. Schierle , author J. Porras , author T. Loew , author M. Minola , author M. Bluschke , author E. Weschke , author B. Keimer , \ and\ author M. Le Tacon ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.054513 journal journal Physical Review B ...

  10. [18]

    \ Kim , author E

    author author H.-H. \ Kim , author E. Lefranıfmmode mboxç else ç fiois , author K. Kummer , author R. Fumagalli , author N. B. \ Brookes , author D. Betto , author S. Nakata , author M. Tortora , author J. Porras , author T. Loew , author M. E. \ Barber , author L. Braicovich ...

  11. [19]

    Wu , author H

    author author T. Wu , author H. Mayaffre , author S. Krämer , author H. Mladen , author C. Berthier , author W. N. \ Hardy , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author M.-H. \ Julien ,\ 10.1038/nature10345 journal journal Nature \ volume 477 ,\ pages 191 ( year 2011...

  12. [20]

    author author E. M. \ Forgan , author E. Blackburn , author A. T. \ Holmes , author A. K. R. \ Briffa , author J. Chang , author L. Bouchenoire , author S. D. \ Brown , author R. Liang , author D. Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author N. B. \ Christensen , author M. V. \ Zimmer...

  13. [21]

    Vinograd , author R

    author author I. Vinograd , author R. Zhou , author M. Hirata , author T. Wu , author H. Mayaffre , author S. Krämer , author R. Liang , author W. N. \ Hardy , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author M.-H. \ Julien ,\ 10.1038/s41467-021-23140-w journal journal Nature Communication...

  14. [22]

    Wu , author H

    author author T. Wu , author H. Mayaffre , author S. Krämer , author M. Horvatić , author C. Berthier , author P. L. \ Kuhns , author A. P. \ Reyes , author R. Liang , author W. N. \ Hardy , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author M.-H. \ Julien ,\ 10.1038/ncomms3113 journal journ...

  15. [23]

    Wu , author H

    author author T. Wu , author H. Mayaffre , author S. Krämer , author M. Horvatić , author C. Berthier , author W. N. \ Hardy , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author M.-H. \ Julien ,\ 10.1038/ncomms7438 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 6 ,\ pages 6...

  16. [24]

    LeBoeuf , author S

    author author D. LeBoeuf , author S. Krämer , author W. N. \ Hardy , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author C. Proust ,\ https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2502 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  17. [25]

    Wahlberg , author R

    author author E. Wahlberg , author R. Arpaia , author G. Seibold , author M. Rossi , author R. Fumagalli , author E. Trabaldo , author N. B. \ Brookes , author L. Braicovich , author S. Caprara , author U. Gran , author G. Ghiringhelli , author T. Bauch , \ and\ author F. Lomb...

  18. [26]

    Doiron-Leyraud , author C

    author author N. Doiron-Leyraud , author C. Proust , author D. LeBoeuf , author J. Levallois , author J.-B. \ Bonnemaison , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , \ and\ author L. Taillefer ,\ https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05872 journal journal ...

  19. [27]

    Chang , author R

    author author J. Chang , author R. Daou , author C. Proust , author D. LeBoeuf , author N. Doiron-Leyraud , author F. Laliberté , author B. Pingault , author B. J. \ Ramshaw , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author H. Takagi , author A. B. \ Antu...

  20. [28]

    author author P. M. C. \ Rourke , author A. F. \ Bangura , author C. Proust , author J. Levallois , author N. Doiron-Leyraud , author D. LeBoeuf , author L. Taillefer , author S. Adachi , author M. L. \ Sutherland , \ and\ author N. E. \ Hussey ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.020514 jo...

  21. [29]

    author author B. J. \ Ramshaw , author S. E. \ Sebastian , author R. D. \ McDonald , author J. Day , author B. S. \ Tan , author Z. Zhu , author J. B. \ Betts , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , \ and\ author N. Harrison ,\ 10.1126/science.aaa4990 ...

  22. [30]

    Hücker , author M

    author author M. Hücker , author M. v. Zimmermann , author G. D. \ Gu , author Z. J. \ Xu , author J. S. \ Wen , author G. Xu , author H. J. \ Kang , author A. Zheludev , \ and\ author J. M. \ Tranquada ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.104506 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ ...

  23. [31]

    author author M. H. \ Julien ,\ 10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01997-X journal journal Physica B: Condensed Matter \ series Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Low Temperature Physics ,\ volume 329-333 ,\ pages 693 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

  24. [32]

    Chang , author C

    author author J. Chang , author C. Niedermayer , author R. Gilardi , author N. B. \ Christensen , author H. M. \ Rønnow , author D. F. \ McMorrow , author M. Ay , author J. Stahn , author O. Sobolev , author A. Hiess , author S. Pailhes , author C. Baines , author N. Momono , ...

  25. [33]

    Gerber , author H

    author author S. Gerber , author H. Jang , author H. Nojiri , author S. Matsuzawa , author H. Yasumura , author D. A. \ Bonn , author R. Liang , author W. N. \ Hardy , author Z. Islam , author A. Mehta , author S. Song , author M. Sikorski , author D. Stefanescu , author Y. Fe...

  26. [34]

    Chang , author E

    author author J. Chang , author E. Blackburn , author O. Ivashko , author A. T. \ Holmes , author N. B. \ Christensen , author M. Hücker , author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , author W. N. \ Hardy , author U. Rütt , author M. v. \ Zimmermann , author E. M. \ Forgan , \ and\...

  27. [35]

    \ Kim , author S

    author author H.-H. \ Kim , author S. M. \ Souliou , author M. E. \ Barber , author E. Lefrançois , author M. Minola , author M. Tortora , author R. Heid , author N. Nandi , author R. A. \ Borzi , author G. Garbarino , author A. Bosak , author J. Porras , author T. Loew , auth...

  28. [36]

    Ruiz , author B

    author author A. Ruiz , author B. Gunn , author Y. Lu , author K. Sasmal , author C. M. \ Moir , author R. Basak , author H. Huang , author J.-S. \ Lee , author F. Rodolakis , author T. J. \ Boyle , author M. Walker , author Y. He , author S. Blanco-Canosa , author E. H. \ da ...

  29. [37]

    Kang , author C

    author author M. Kang , author C. C. \ Zhang , author E. Schierle , author S. McCoy , author J. Li , author R. Sutarto , author A. Suter , author T. Prokscha , author Z. Salman , author E. Weschke , author S. Cybart , author J. Y. T. \ Wei , \ and\ author R. Comin ,\ 10.1073/p...

  30. [38]

    Gustafson , author M

    author author J. Gustafson , author M. Shipilin , author C. Zhang , author A. Stierle , author U. Hejral , author U. Ruett , author O. Gutowski , author P.-A. \ Carlsson , author M. Skoglundh , \ and\ author E. Lundgren ,\ 10.1126/science.1246834 journal journal Science \ volu...

  31. [39]

    Wang , author M

    author author Q. Wang , author M. Horio , author K. von Arx , author Y. Shen , author D. John Mukkattukavil , author Y. Sassa , author O. Ivashko , author C. E. \ Matt , author S. Pyon , author T. Takayama , author H. Takagi , author T. Kurosawa , author N. Momono , author M. ...

  32. [40]

    Arpaia , author L

    author author R. Arpaia , author L. Martinelli , author M. M. \ Sala , author S. Caprara , author A. Nag , author N. B. \ Brookes , author P. Camisa , author Q. Li , author Q. Gao , author X. Zhou , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author E. Schierle , author...

  33. [41]

    Jang , author W.-S

    author author H. Jang , author W.-S. \ Lee , author H. Nojiri , author S. Matsuzawa , author H. Yasumura , author L. Nie , author A. V. \ Maharaj , author S. Gerber , author Y.-J. \ Liu , author A. Mehta , author D. A. \ Bonn , author R. Liang , author W. N. \ Hardy , author C...

  34. [42]

    Liang , author D

    author author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author W. N. \ Hardy ,\ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786435.2012.669065 journal journal Philos. Mag. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 2563 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Liang , author D

    author author R. Liang , author D. A. \ Bonn , \ and\ author W. N. \ Hardy ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.180505 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 73 ,\ pages 180505 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

  36. [44]

    Comin \ and\ author A

    author author R. Comin \ and\ author A. Damascelli ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011401 journal journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 7 ,\ pages 369 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  37. [45]

    author author B. J. \ Campbell , author H. T. \ Stokes , author D. E. \ Tanner , \ and\ author D. M. \ Hatch ,\ 10.1107/S0021889806014075 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 39 ,\ pages 607 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

  38. [46]

    Arpaia , author E

    author author R. Arpaia , author E. Andersson , author E. Trabaldo , author T. Bauch , \ and\ author F. Lombardi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.024804 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 024804 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  39. [47]

    Arpaia , author N

    author author R. Arpaia , author N. Alcalde-Herraiz , author A. D'Alessio , author E. Stepantsov , author E. Wahlberg , author A. Kalaboukhov , author T. Bauch , \ and\ author F. Lombardi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.044803 journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 8 ,\ page...

  40. [48]

    author author M. v. Zimmermann , author O. Ivashko , author F. Igoa Saldaña , author J. Liu , author P. Glaevecke , author O. Gutowski , author R. Nowak , author K. Köhler , author B. Winkler , author A. Schöps , author H. Schulte-Schrepping , \ and\ author A.-C. \ Dippel ,\ 1...

  41. [49]

    Oppliger , author J

    author author J. Oppliger , author J. Küspert , author A.-C. \ Dippel , author M. v. Zimmermann , author O. Gutowski , author X. Ren , author X. Zhou , author Z. Zhu , author R. Frison , author Q. Wang , author L. Martinelli , author I. Biało , \ and\ author J. Chang ,\ 10.103...

  42. [50]

    Weschke \ and\ author E

    author author E. Weschke \ and\ author E. Schierle ,\ 10.17815/jlsrf-4-77 journal journal Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF \ volume 4 ,\ pages A127 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.