Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Strong correlation behavior and Strong coupling superconductivity in (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix with the rich magnetic element Ni

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the medium-entropy alloy (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix, nickel doping preserves the BCC structure, raises the superconducting transition temperature to 7.36 K, and yields specific-heat jumps and Kadowaki-Woods ratios that place the…

desk verdict Solid new data on Ni-doped TiHfNbTa with a credible bulk-superconductivity result, but the strong-correlation claim is oversold and the monotonic-Tc narrative stumbles on the undoped endpoint. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21793 v1 pith:DQATBOPZ submitted 2025-07-29 cond-mat.supr-con

Zijun Huang , Tong Li , Longfu Li , Rui Chen , Zaichen Xiang , Shuangyue Wang , Jingjun Qin , Yucheng Li
show 3 more authors
Lingyong Zeng Dinghua Bao Huixia Luo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Medium-entropyalloysHigh-entropyalloysuperconductorsStrongcouplingsuperconductivityKadowaki-WoodsratioelectroncorrelationValencecountNickeldopingBulktype-IIsuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that adding up to 7.7% nickel to the medium-entropy superconductor TiHfNbTa keeps the body-centered-cubic structure intact and turns every measured composition into a bulk type-II superconductor whose critical temperature rises with nickel content, reaching 7.36 K at x = 0.077. The specific-heat jump ratios of 2.44 to 2.89, well above the BCS weak-coupling value of 1.43, mark all compositions as strongly coupled superconductors, with the coupling slightly weakening as nickel increases. The authors further argue that a large Kadowaki-Woods ratio for the x = 0.077 sample indicates extremely strong electron correlations, and they attribute the Tc enhancement to the increase in valence electron count caused by nickel doping. If correct, the paper establishes a new material platform where strong electron-phonon coupling and strong electron correlations coexist, offering a tunable system for studying unconventional superconductivity.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two dimensionless ratios and one composition parameter. The first is the normalized specific-heat jump ΔCel/γTc, computed through the alpha model, which distinguishes weak (1.43) from strong coupling; the measured values 2.44–2.89 place all samples above the BCS limit. The second is the Kadowaki-Woods ratio KWR = A/γ², formed from the T² resistivity coefficient A and the Sommerfeld coefficient γ, whose placement relative to universal transition-metal and heavy-fermion lines is used to infer electron correlation strength. The composition parameter is the valence electron count (VEC), which increases monotonically with nickel content and is presented as the control variable that raises Tc, following the trend previously established for the parent TiHfNbTa system.

What would settle it

Measure the resistivity of a higher-purity (annealed or single-crystal) sample of (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)0.923Ni0.077 below 2 K and check whether ρ(T) − ρ0 scales as T² over a substantial temperature window; if the exponent deviates from 2 or the fitted A changes by more than experimental uncertainty when the fitting range is varied, the Kadowaki-Woods-based strong-correlation claim would be unsupported. A second falsifying observation would be to dope with a non-magnetic element that raises the VEC by the same amount as nickel and find no corresponding Tc increase, which would contradict the paper's VEC mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix with 0 < x ≤ 0.077, nickel is a beneficial dopant: it enters the BCC solid solution up to about 7.7%, all samples are bulk type-II superconductors with a 100% Meissner fraction, and Tc increases monotonically with nickel content from 6.55 K to 7.36 K. The normalized specific-heat jump ΔCel/γTc decreases from 2.89 to 2.44 as x rises, yet remains far above the BCS value of 1.43, so the alloys stay strongly coupled throughout. A single Kadowaki-Woods ratio extracted for x = 0.077, A/γ² ≈ 1.5×10⁻³ μΩ cm K⁻² / (4.297 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻²)², lies beyond the heavy-fermion line, which the authors interpret as evidence of extremely strong electron correlation. The paper concludes that nickel doping increases the valence electron count and that this VEC increase drives the Tc enhancement, consistent with the Matthias-rule trend for crystalline transition-metal superconductors.

Load-bearing premise

The strongest correlation claim rests on a single quadratic resistivity coefficient extracted from a highly disordered sample (residual resistivity ratio near 1), assuming that the low-temperature ρ(T) = ρ0 + A T² form is a genuine Fermi-liquid electron-electron scattering term and that the resulting A/γ² can be compared against universal Kadowaki-Woods lines without correction for disorder or multiband effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the VEC-driven Tc enhancement is correct, doping medium-entropy superconductors with elements that raise the valence electron count is a predictable route to higher critical temperatures within the BCC family.
  • The coexistence of strong electron-phonon coupling (ΔCel/γTc ≈ 2.4–2.9) with a very large Kadowaki-Woods ratio suggests that BCC high-entropy alloys can host both conventional strong coupling and correlation effects normally associated with heavy-fermion or unconventional superconductors.
  • Because Tc increases rather than being suppressed when a magnetic element is added, the paper implies that local magnetic moments from nickel do not destroy Cooper pairing in this highly disordered environment, opening the possibility of tuning magnetic character without losing superconductivity.
  • The systematic decrease of ΔCel/γTc with nickel content means the coupling strength can be continuously adjusted by composition while remaining in the strong-coupling regime, providing a fine-tuning knob for future experiments.
  • All measured compositions show bulk superconductivity with a full Meissner fraction, so the series can serve as a clean platform for pressure, disorder, or further substitution studies aimed at the interplay between strong correlations and superconductivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper reports the Kadowaki-Woods ratio only for x = 0.077; an obvious testable extension is to extract A and γ for every composition to see whether the strong-correlation signature grows monotonically with nickel content or appears only at the highest doping.
  • A cleaner separation of the VEC effect from nickel's magnetic character could be achieved by substituting a non-magnetic element that raises the VEC by the same amount (for example molybdenum or tungsten) and comparing the Tc trend; if Tc rises identically, magnetism is irrelevant to the enhancement.
  • The authors attribute the extreme Kadowaki-Woods ratio to strong dynamical electron-phonon coupling rather than to electronic correlations alone, following the A15-compound precedent; this leaves open the question of whether the same alloys would show heavy-fermion-like mass enhancement in direct probes such as magnetic-field-dependent specific heat or de Haas–van Alphen measurements.
  • Since the Kadowaki-Woods ratio is derived from a single T² fit on a sample with RRR near 1, a natural extension is to measure the resistivity exponent over a wider temperature range on an annealed or higher-purity specimen; if the deviation from T² is large or the coefficient changes with fit window, the correlation claim would need reassessment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the synthesis and characterization of the body-centered-cubic medium/high-entropy alloy series (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix with x = 0.014, 0.027, 0.042, 0.059, and 0.077, prepared by arc melting. Structural characterization (XRD, SEM-EDX) indicates a single BCC phase with homogeneous elemental distribution up to x = 0.077. Transport, magnetization, AC susceptibility, and specific-heat measurements are used to support three central claims: (i) all compositions are bulk type-II superconductors; (ii) Tc increases monotonically with Ni content, from 6.55 K at x = 0.014 to 7.36 K at x = 0.077, reaching 7.36 K; (iii) the normalized specific-heat jump ΔCel/γTc between 2.44 and 2.89 indicates strong electron-phonon coupling, and a Kadowaki-Woods ratio derived from a single resistivity fit indicates strong electron correlations. The paper concludes that Ni doping raises the valence electron count and thereby enhances Tc.

Significance. The bulk superconducting state in this Ni-doped HEA is credible and experimentally well supported: the combination of zero resistivity, diamagnetic shielding with demagnetization corrections reaching a full Meissner fraction, a single AC-susceptibility transition, and a specific-heat jump is mutually consistent. If the interpretive claims were fully supported, the system would be a notable addition to the small family of magnetic-element-doped HEA superconductors and potentially a platform for studying strong coupling together with strong correlations. However, the headline trend and the two 'strong' conclusions currently rest on an inconsistent composition trend, on alpha-model parameters that are partly circular, and on a single uncharacterized resistivity fit. These issues reduce the paper's current significance to that of a solid materials characterization report, with the physics claims requiring additional analysis and independent support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Table 1 and Figure 2(b)] The central claim that Tc increases monotonically with Ni content is internally inconsistent with the undoped endpoint. Table 1 lists Tc = 6.75 K for x = 0 (from reference [18]) and Tc = 6.55 K for x = 0.014; the text states that 'the Tc rises from 6.55 K to 7.35 K monotonically as the Ni content increases.' Thus the first doping step decreases Tc by 0.20 K, contradicting the abstract and conclusion that 'Tc increases with the increase of Ni-doped contents' across the series. To support the monotonic trend, the authors must either include the x = 0 point with the same synthesis and measurement conditions, show multiple batches with error bars, or explicitly restrict the claimed monotonicity to the doped range 0.014 ≤ x ≤ 0.077.
  2. [Section III, alpha-model analysis and Figure 4] The strong-coupling analysis is partly circular. The values of ωln are obtained by inverting the relation ΔCel/γTc = 1.43[1 + 53(Tc/ωlog)^2 ln(ωlog/3Tc)] from the measured ΔCel/γTc, and the values of 2Δ0/kBTc are obtained from the same alpha model. Figure 4(a) then plots ΔCel/γTc against ωln/Tc, and Figure 4(b) plots 2Δ0/kBTc against ωln/Tc; these are essentially replots of the defining relation rather than independent tests. The manuscript also does not report the fitting ranges, residuals, or uncertainties for the Cp/T = γ + βT^2 fits from which ΔCel and Tc are extracted. The authors should present the alpha-model fits with residuals, propagate uncertainties, and either compare with an independent probe of the gap (e.g., tunneling or optical conductivity) or explicitly label Figures 4(a) and 4(b) as model inversions rather than empirical correlations.
  3. [Section III, Figure 5 and Kadowaki-Woods ratio] The strong-correlation conclusion rests on a single resistivity coefficient A = 1.5×10^-3 μΩ cm K^-2 reported for x = 0.077, with no fitting window, no residuals, and no uncertainty. No A value is given for the other compositions, and the residual resistivity ratio is close to 1, indicating strong disorder. In such a dirty alloy, the apparent T^2 term can be contaminated by multiband scattering, magnetic fluctuations, or a poorly chosen temperature window, all of which the authors themselves mention as alternative sources of a large KWR. To make the 'extremely strong electron correlation' claim load-bearing, the authors need to show the ρ(T) fit and its residuals, justify the temperature range, report the uncertainty in A, and ideally show A for several compositions. Without this, Figure 5 only locates one derived point, not a systematic correlation effect.
  4. [Abstract and Section I] The statement that the maximum solid solution of (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix is about 7.7% is not supported by the data presented. The XRD patterns show single-phase BCC behavior for x ≤ 0.077, but no composition with x > 0.077 was synthesized or measured. A maximum solid-solution limit requires evidence of phase separation or a lattice-parameter discontinuity beyond the claimed boundary. The text should be revised to 'single-phase up to x = 0.077' unless additional compositions are studied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, heat capacity paragraph] The text states 'As demonstrated in Figure 5, the normal-state specific heat data can be modeled...' but Figure 5 is the Kadowaki-Woods plot; the normal-state specific-heat fits appear in Figure 3. The cross-reference should be corrected.
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript uses both ωlog and ωln for the logarithmically averaged phonon frequency; please standardize the notation and use it consistently in equations, Table 1, and Figure 4.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'Kadawaki-Woods' should be 'Kadowaki-Woods'; 'Sommerfield' should be 'Sommerfeld'; 'imgaes' should be 'images'; 'accelerting' should be 'accelerating'; and 'Ti-Zr-Hf-Nb-Ta system' should be 'Ti-Hf-Nb-Ta system'.
  4. [Section III and Supplementary Figures] The text refers to 'Figure 2(c) and Figure S1' for magnetotransport, but Figure S1 is also used earlier for EDX line scans and point analysis. The supplementary figure numbering needs to be reorganized to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Section III, KWR paragraph] The authors state that the KWR is nearly an order of magnitude larger than in V3Si and many heavy-fermion compounds, but they do not quote the numerical A/γ^2 value. The numerical ratio and its uncertainty should be given explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The α-model ωln and 2∆0/kBTc are derived from the measured ∆Cel/γTc and then plotted against it, so the strong-coupling 'trends' are tautological; raw superconductivity evidence is independent.

  1. self definitional [Section III, paragraph beginning 'The logarithmically averaged characteristic phonon frequency ωln...'; Figure 4(a)-(b); Table 1]
    "The logarithmically averaged characteristic phonon frequency ωln can be calculated by the formula ∆Cel/γTc = 1.43[1 + 53(Tc/ωlog)^2 ln(ωlog/3Tc)]. The relationship between normalized specific heat jump and ωln normalized by Tc is performed in Figure 4(a). One can observe that the specific heat jump decreases with the enhancement of normalized ωln ... As shown in Figure 4(b), the series of samples also follow a similar trend with (Ti1/3Hf1/3Ta1/3)1-xNbx and other strong coupling superconductors."

    The formula is a single equation relating ωln to the measured ∆Cel/γTc; inverting it assigns one ωln/Tc to each measured jump. Figure 4(a) plots the measured jump against this inverted ωln/Tc, so the decreasing curve is the algebraic inverse of the paper's own formula, not a nontrivial trend. The α-model gap ratio 2∆0/kBTc is likewise fixed by matching the same jump, making Figure 4(b) a parametric replot of one input (the jump) against functions of that input. Therefore these plots cannot independently confirm strong-coupling physics; the only independent evidence is the raw ratio exceeding 1.43, plus the directly measured Tc.

full rationale

The bulk superconducting state is established independently by resistivity, magnetization (100% Meissner fraction after demagnetization correction), and specific-heat jumps, so the materials-science core is not circular. The circularity lies in the α-model bookkeeping: ωln and 2∆0/kBTc are obtained by inverting formulas that contain the measured ∆Cel/γTc, and the paper then presents plots of ∆Cel/γTc against ωln/Tc (Figure 4(a)) and of 2∆0/kBTc versus ωln/Tc (Figure 4(b)) as if they were empirical correlations. These plots reproduce the input formula and cannot falsify anything. The 'extremely strong electron correlation' claim via KWR uses a single fitted A and γ without reported fit windows/uncertainties; that is a robustness/correctness concern, not a constructional circularity. Self-citations (refs. [18],[31]) are used for the undoped endpoint and for comparison, but the new x>0 data are independently measured; hence those citations are not load-bearing for the central superconducting claim. Table 1's Tc(0)=6.75 from [18] vs Tc(0.014)=6.55 undermines the 'monotonic' phrasing, but that is an internal-consistency problem rather than a circular one.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard solid-state formulas and on domain assumptions that the disordered alloy can be described by single-gap BCS, McMillan, and alpha-model thermodynamics and by the Kadowaki-Woods scaling. The main risk is in the KWR and alpha-model assumptions; no fundamentally new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.13
    Assumed typical value for intermetallic superconductors in the McMillan and Allen-Dynes estimates of lambda_ep and Tc; not fitted to this data but directly controls the derived coupling strength.
  • Sommerfeld coefficient gamma = 4.20 to 4.71 mJ mol^-1 K^-2
    Obtained from linear fits of Cp/T vs T^2 in the normal state; enters the normalized specific heat jump, Debye temperature, and Kadowaki-Woods ratio.
  • Lattice specific heat coefficient beta = 0.18 to 0.24 mJ mol^-1 K^-4
    Fitted from Cp/T vs T^2 and used to derive the Debye temperature via the Debye formula.
  • Resistivity T^2 coefficient A (x=0.077) = 1.5 x 10^-3 micro-ohm cm K^-2
    Extracted from low-temperature resistivity fit and used as the numerator of the Kadowaki-Woods ratio; the fit range and uncertainty are not reported.
  • Alpha-model coupling ratio 2Delta0/kBTc = 4.60 to 5.02
    Adjusted in the alpha model so that the calculated electronic specific heat reproduces the measured DeltaCel/gammaTc; these values are then reported as coupling estimates.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The low-temperature specific heat of the normal state is Cp = gamma T + beta T^3 with a single electronic gamma and a Debye lattice term.
    Used to extract gamma, beta, and Theta_D by linear fitting Cp/T vs T^2; assumes no additional low-temperature contributions from disorder modes or magnetic excitations.
  • domain assumption The alpha model with a single isotropic gap describes the thermodynamics of these alloys.
    Used to convert measured DeltaCel/gammaTc into omega_ln, 2Delta0/kBTc, and coupling strength; if the gap is anisotropic or multiband, these derived numbers are not valid.
  • domain assumption McMillan and Allen-Dynes formulas with mu* = 0.13 and a phonon spectrum characterized by Theta_D or omega_ln describe Tc in these disordered alloys.
    Used to compute lambda_ep and to explain the Tc trend; this presumes conventional electron-phonon pairing and ignores possible magnetic or disorder effects from Ni.
  • domain assumption The Kadowaki-Woods ratio A/gamma^2 is a valid measure of electron correlation strength in a highly disordered, low-RRR alloy.
    The paper compares A/gamma^2 to universal lines for transition metals and heavy fermions; the authors note mechanisms beyond correlation can raise KWR, which weakens this premise.
  • domain assumption X-ray diffraction phase purity and Rietveld refinement confirm a single BCC solid solution with no undetected secondary phases or Ni segregation.
    The claim of a maximum solid solution of about 7.7% and homogeneous Ni substitution relies on XRD and SEM-EDX data, which cannot rule out small amounts of impurity or clustering below detection limits.
  • standard math Ginzburg-Landau and WHH extrapolation formulas give valid upper critical fields at 0 K.
    Used to estimate mu0Hc2(0); the paper cites refs [23-25] for applicability beyond Tc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong correlation behavior and Strong coupling superconductivity in (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix with the rich magnetic element Ni." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQATBOPZ

@misc{pith2026250721793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong correlation behavior and Strong coupling superconductivity in (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix with the rich magnetic element Ni},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQATBOPZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21793}
}
read the original abstract

Searching for new superconductors, especially unconventional superconductors, has been studied extensively for decades but remains one of the major outstanding challenges in condensed matter physics. Medium/high-entropy alloys (MEAs-HEAs) are new fertile soils of unconventional superconductors and generate widespread interest and questions on the existence of superconductivity in highly disordered materials. Here, we report on the effect of Ni-doped on the crystal structure and superconductivity properties of strongly coupled TiHfNbTa MEA. XRD results indicate that the maximum solid solution of (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix is about 7.7%. Resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and specific heat measurements demonstrated that (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix HEAs are all bulk type-II superconductors and follow the trend of the increase of Tc with the increase of Ni-doped contents. The specific heat jump of all (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix are much larger than the BCS value of 1.43, suggesting all these HEAs are strongly coupled superconductors. Additionally, large Kadawaki-Woods ratio values suggest that there is a strong electron correlation effect in this system. The (Ti1/4Hf1/4Nb1/4Ta1/4)1-xNix HEA system is a new ideal material platform for the study of strong correlation behavior and strongly coupled superconductivity, which provides an insight into the physics of high-temperature superconductors or other unconventional superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21793 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. The measured electronic specific heat Cel/T versus T for (a) x = 0.077, (b) x = 0.059, (c) x = 0.042, (d) x = 0.027, (e) x = 0.014. The insets show the measured heat capacity Cp/T versus T2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Zeng L, Hu X, Boubeche M, Li K, Li L, Yu P, Wang K, Zhang C, Jin K, Yao D X and Luo H 2023 Extremely strong coupling s-wave superconductivity in the medium -entropy alloy TiHfNbTa Sci. China. Phys. Mech. Astron. 66 1–9

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    122 448-511

    Miracle D B and Senkov O N 2017 A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts Acta Mater. 122 448-511

    work page 2017

  3. [2]

    Today 19 349-62

    Ye Y F, Wang Q, Lu J, Liu C T and Yang Y 2016 High-entropy alloy: Challenges and prospects Mater. Today 19 349-62

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    George E P, Raabe D and Ritchie R O 2019 High-entropy alloys Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 515–34

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Sun L and Cava R J 2019 High -entropy alloy superconductors: Status, opportunities, and challenges Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 090301

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Zeng L, Wang Z, Song J, Lin G, Guo R, Luo S C, Guo S, Li K, Yu P, Zhang C, Guo W M, Ma J, Hou Y and Luo H 2023 Discovery of the high-entropy carbide ceramic topological superconductor candidate (Ti0.2Zr0.2Nb0.2Hf0.2Ta0.2) C Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 2301929

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    61 2628–38

    Otto F, Yang Y , Bei H and George E P 2013 Relative effects of enthalpy and entropy on the phase stability of equiatomic high-entropy alloys Acta Mater. 61 2628–38

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Edalati P, Mohammadi A, Ketabchi M and Edalati K 2021 Ultrahigh hardness in nanostructured dual -phase high -entropy alloy AlCrFeCoNiNb developed by high -pressure torsion J. Alloy. Compd. 884 161101

    work page 2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    Han Z D, Luan H W, Zhao S F, Chen N, Peng R X, Shao Y and Yao K F 2018 Microstructures and mechanical properties of AlCrFeNiMo0.5Tix high entropy alloys Chinese Phys. Lett. 35 306102

    2018

  2. [9]

    Kou H, Lu J and Li Y 2014 High ‐strength and high‐ductility nanostructured and amorphous metallic materials Adv. Mater. 26 5518-24

    2014

  3. [10]

    Hua N, Wang W, Wang Q, Ye Y , Lin S, Zhang L, Guo Q, Brechtl J and Liaw P K 2021 Mechanical, corrosion, and wear properties of biomedical Ti-Zr-Nb-Ta-Mo high entropy alloys J. Alloy. Compd. 861 157997

    2021

  4. [11]

    Koželj P, Vrtnik S, Jelen A, Jazbec S, Jagličić Z, Maiti S, Feuerbacher M, Steurer W and Dolinšek J 2014 Dis covery of a superconducting high -entropy alloy Phys. Rev. Lett . 113 107001

    2014

  5. [12]

    Zeng L, Li L, Li K, Chen R and Luo H 2024 Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors NPG Asia Mater. 16 60

    2024

  6. [13]

    Zeng L, Hu X, Zhou Y , Boubeche M, Guo R, Liu Y , Luo S C, Guo S, Li K, Yu P, Zhang C, Guo W M, Sun L, Yao D X and Luo H 2024 Superconductivity in the high-entropy ceramics Ti0.2Zr0.2Nb0.2Mo0.2Ta0.2Cx with possible nontrivial band topology Adv. Sci. 11 2305054

    2024

  7. [14]

    V on Rohr F, Winiarski M J, Tao J, Klimczuk T and Cava R J 2016 Effect of electron count and chemical complexity in the Ta -Nb-Hf-Zr-Ti high-entropy alloy superconductor Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 E7144–50

    2016

  8. [15]

    Guo J, Wang H, V on Rohr F, Wang Z, Cai S, Zhou Y , Yang K, Li A, Jiang S, Wu Q, Cava R J and Sun L 2017 Robust zero resistance in a superconducting high -entropy alloy at pressures up to 190 GPa Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 114 13144–7

    2017

  9. [16]

    Matthias B T 1955 Empirical relation between superconductivity a nd the number of valence electrons per atom Phys. Rev. 97 74–6

    1955

  10. [17]

    Marik S, Varghese M, Sajilesh K P, Singh D and Singh R P 2018 Superconductivity in equimolar Nb-Re-Hf-Zr-Ti high entropy alloy J. Alloy. Compd. 769 1059-63

    2018

  11. [19]

    Gao X, Chen R, Liu T, Fang H, Qin G, Su Y and Guo J 2022 High-entropy alloys: a review of mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms at cryogenic temperatures J. Mater. Sci. 57 6573-6606

    2022

  12. [20]

    Cantor B 2021 Multicomponent high-entropy Cantor alloys Prog. Mater. Sci. 120 100754

    2021

  13. [21]

    Today Commun

    Ji G N, Xiang J, Zhao R D, Wu F F and Chen S H 2022 Microstructure and mechanical properties of NixFeCoCrAl high-entropy alloys Mater. Today Commun. 32 103919

    2022

  14. [22]

    Shi Y , Yang B and Liaw P K 2017 Corrosion-resistant high-entropy alloys: A review Metals 7 43

    2017

  15. [23]

    Carbotte J P 1990 Properties of boson -exchange superconductors Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 1027– 157

    1990

  16. [24]

    Sci Tech

    Zhu X, Yang H, Fang L, Mu G and Wen H -H 2008 Upper critical field, Hall effect and magnetoresistance in the iron-based layered superconductor LaFeAsO0.9F0.1-δ Supercond. Sci Tech. 21 105001

    2008

  17. [25]

    Werthamer N R, Helfand E, and Hohenberg P C 1966 Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, 𝐻𝑐2. III. Electron spin and spin-orbit Effects Phys. Rev. 147, 295

    1966

  18. [26]

    Kitagawa J, Hamamoto S and Ishizu N 2020 Cutting edge of high -entropy alloy superconductors from the perspective of materials research Metals (Basel) 10 1–22

    2020

  19. [27]

    Xiao G, Yang W, Zhu Q, Song S, Cao G-H, Ren Z 2023 Superconductivity with large upper critical field in noncentrosymmetric Cr-bearing high-entropy alloys 223 115099

    2023

  20. [28]

    Johnston D C 2013 Elaboration of the α-model derived from the BCS theory of superconductivity Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 115011

    2013

  21. [29]

    Zeng L, Hu X, Zhou Y , Liu Y , Boswell M, Xie W, Li K, Li L, Yu P, Zhang C, Guo W-M, Yao D-X and Luo H 2023 Superconductivity and non -trivial band topology in high -entropy carbonitride Ti0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2Mo0.2W0.2C1-xNx The Innov. Mater. 1 100042

    2023

  22. [30]

    Zeng L, Zhou H, Du H, Zhong R, Guo R, Guo S, Su W, Li K, Zhang C, Yu P and Luo H 2023 Superconductivity in the cobalt-doped V 3Si A15 intermetallic compound Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36 035003

    2023

  23. [31]

    Li L, Tian H, Hu X, Zeng L, Li K, Yu P, Wang K, Chen R, Xiang Z, Yao D X and Luo H 2024 Large upper critical fields and strong coupling superconductivity in the medium-entropy alloy (Ti1/3Hf1/3Ta1/3)1-xNbx Supercond. Sci. Technol. 38 015025

    2024

  24. [32]

    186 250–6

    Kim G, Lee M H, Yun J H, Rawat P, Jung S G, Choi W, You T S, Kim S J and Rhyee J S 2020 Strongly correlated and strongly coupled s -wave superconductivity of the high entropy alloy Ta1/6Nb2/6Hf1/6Zr1/6Ti1/6 compound Acta Mater. 186 250–6

    2020

  25. [33]

    Hiroi Z, Yonezawa S, Nagao Y and Y amaura J 2007 Extremely strong -coupling superconductivity and anomalous lattice properties in the β-pyrochlore oxide KOs 2O6 Phys. Rev. B 76 014523

    2007

  26. [34]

    Liu Z C, Li B Z, Xiao Y Sen, Duan Q C, Cui Y W, Mei Y X, Tao Q, Wei S L, Tan S G, Jing Q, Lu Q, Sun Y P, Liu Y Y , Fu S G, Jiang H, Ren Z, Xu Z A, Wang C and Cao G H 2021 Superconductivity in ThMo 2Si2C with Mo 2C square net Sci. China. Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 277411

    2021

  27. [35]

    V on Rohr F O and Cava R J 2018 Isoelectronic substitutions and aluminium alloying in the Ta-Nb-Hf-Zr-Ti high-entropy alloy superconductor Phys. Rev. Mater. 2 034801

    2018

  28. [36]

    Collver M M and Hammond R H 1979 Superconductivity in amorphous 3d -transition-metal alloy films Phys. Rev. B 19 525–6

    1979

  29. [37]

    Yang Z, Yang Z, Su Q, Fang E, Yang J, Chen B and Wang H 2022 Superconductivity in TlBi2 with a large Kadowaki-Woods ratio Phys. Rev. B 106 224501

    2022

  30. [38]

    Rice M J 1968 Electron-electron scattering in transition metals Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 1439

    1968

  31. [39]

    58 507-9

    Kadowaki K and Woods S B 1986 Universal relationship of the resistivity and specific heat in heavy-fermion compounds Solid State Commun. 58 507-9

    1986

  32. [40]

    Tsujii N, Kontani H and Yoshimura K 2005 Universality in heavy fermion systems with general degeneracy Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 057201

    2005

  33. [41]

    Li S Y , Taillefer L, Hawthorn D G, Tanatar M A, Paglione J, Sutherland M, Hill R W, Wang C H and Chen X H 2004 Giant electron-electron scattering in the fermi-liquid state of Na0.7CoO2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 056401

    2004

  34. [42]

    China Phys

    Wu W, Zhang X, Yin Z, Zheng P, Wang N and Luo J 2010 Low temperature properties of pnictide CrAs single crystal Sci. China Phys. Mech. 53 1207-11

    2010

  35. [43]

    Miyake K, Matsuura T and Varma C M 1989 Relation between resistivity and effective mass in heavy-fermion and A15 compounds Solid State Commun. 71 1149

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.