Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 103 references

To Vary or Not To Vary: A Flexible Empirical Bayes Factor for Testing Variance Components

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes an empirical Bayes factor that tests for random effects using only the full mixed model fit, replacing the boundary problem of testing a variance component at zero with a Savage-Dickey density ratio for all random…

desk verdict Useful single-fit empirical Bayes factor for variance components, but the abstract gives no evidence that the data-dependent Savage-Dickey ratio is calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01403 v1 pith:6TRINVIV submitted 2025-08-02 stat.ME

Fabio Vieira , Hongwei Zhao , Joris Mulder This is my paper
classification stat.ME MSC 62F1562J10
keywords empiricalBayesfactorrandomeffectsvariancecomponentsSavage-Dickeydensityratioboundaryproblemmixedmodelshypothesistesting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Random effects are standard tools for capturing heterogeneity, but deciding whether they are present is awkward because the variance component sits at a boundary under the null. This paper proposes an empirical Bayes factor (EBF) that instead tests whether all random effects are zero, using only the full model fit and avoiding the need to set priors by hand. The random effects distribution is estimated from the data, which is what makes the procedure empirical. If it works, researchers can test random-effect terms across many mixed-model families from a single fit, with no separate null-model fits and no subjective prior elicitation. Simulations and applications to several model classes illustrate the claimed flexibility.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Savage-Dickey density ratio: for a point-null hypothesis, a Bayes factor can be written as the ratio of the posterior density to the prior density of the parameter evaluated at the null value. The EBF uses this identity with all random effects set to zero, so the full model fit supplies everything needed; no reduced model needs to be fitted. Because the random effects distribution is estimated from the data, the resulting quantity is an empirical Bayes factor.

What would settle it

Generate many datasets under the null model where all random effects are zero, fit only the full model, and compare the distribution of the EBF with a benchmark Bayes factor obtained from proper priors; if the EBF is not calibrated under the null or systematically favors the full model, the claim that it is a valid Bayes factor fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that testing a variance component for absence can be recast as testing that all random effects are zero, and that the resulting Bayes factor can be computed from the full model alone via a Savage-Dickey density ratio. The random effects distribution is part of the lower level of the model and is estimated from the data, so the method is empirical and requires no external prior knowledge. The EBF therefore sidesteps the non-negativity boundary problem and, in principle, applies uniformly to linear and generalized linear crossed mixed models, spatial random effects models, dynamic structural equation models, random intercept cross-lagged panel models, and nonlinear mixed effects models.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that using the same data to estimate the random-effects distribution and then to evaluate the likelihood still yields a valid Bayes factor; this empirical shortcut is assumed not to amount to double use of the data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Only the full model needs to be fitted to test any random-effect term; null and reduced models become unnecessary.
  • The boundary problem of testing $\sigma^2=0$ is bypassed by testing the equivalent statement that the entire random-effects vector is zero.
  • The procedure applies across mixed-model families, including crossed, spatial, dynamic, panel, and nonlinear specifications, from one estimation framework.
  • No subjective prior for the variance component is required, eliminating a common barrier to routine Bayes factor testing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not pursued here, would be ranking or selecting among several random-effect structures using one full-model EBF, since the full fit already contains all candidate random effects.
  • The empirical construction raises a calibration question for future work: if estimating the prior from the same data biases the density ratio under the null, a correction or a calibration check would be needed before the EBF is used as a decisive Bayes factor.
  • One could test the method's frequentist properties under the null, for instance whether repeated EBF values behave like a valid Bayes factor, which would connect it to the broader empirical Bayes model selection literature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an empirical Bayes factor (EBF) for testing the presence of random effects, reformulated as a test of whether all random effects are zero. The method uses a Savage-Dickey density ratio that, according to the abstract, can be computed from a single full-model fit, avoiding manual prior specification because the random-effects distribution is estimated from the data. The paper claims broad applicability across generalized linear crossed mixed models, spatial random effects models, dynamic structural equation models, random intercept cross-lagged panel models, and nonlinear mixed effects models, and reports that simulations on synthetic data evaluate the method's general behavior. This report is based solely on the abstract, as the full text was not available; consequently, all assessment here refers to the abstract's claims and the evidence provided therein.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the EBF would be a practically valuable tool: it promises to test variance components in many mixed-model families using only the full model fit, with no subjective prior specification. That would eliminate the need to fit multiple models and would side-step the boundary problem in variance-component testing. However, the significance hinges on whether the EBF is a calibrated Bayesian procedure. The abstract explicitly states that the random-effects distribution is estimated from the data and used in the Savage-Dickey ratio, which raises the concern of double use of data. Without a proof of calibration or null-distribution simulations, the method's usefulness as a hypothesis test remains unestablished. The paper does not seem to provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code in the available text, and the abstract gives no error quantification, so the strength of the empirical claims cannot be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the random-effects distribution is 'estimated from the data' and used in the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Because the same data are then used both to form the prior and to evaluate the likelihood, the resulting ratio is a data-dependent statistic, not a ratio of marginal likelihoods under two fixed hypotheses. For a normal random-effects prior with estimated variance σ̂², the prior density at zero is p(0 | σ̂²) = (2πσ̂²)^(-d/2), which is a function of the data. The paper provides no analytical argument or simulation evidence that this statistic is calibrated under the null hypothesis (e.g., uniform p-values or correct Type I error rates). This is the load-bearing issue for the paper's central claim that the EBF 'tests' random effects, and it must be resolved.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract does not address the boundary case where the estimated variance component is zero. In that case the prior density in the Savage-Dickey ratio is degenerate and the ratio is undefined. Since the paper motivates itself by the non-negativity-constrained variance component boundary problem, the behavior of the EBF at and near this boundary is central. The abstract supplies no statement about how the method handles this case or how the constrained parameter space affects the null distribution of the test statistic. This missing point is directly relevant to the method's validity in the very setting it aims to address.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'equivalent hypothesis that all random effects are zero' should be made formally precise, especially for nonlinear mixed-effects models, where random effects can enter nonlinearly and the definition of 'all random effects zero' may not be equivalent to a variance component being zero.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract does not cite prior work on empirical Bayes model comparison or on the Savage-Dickey density ratio; situating the proposal in that literature would clarify the intended contribution.
  3. [Abstract] The list of application families is long, but the abstract does not explain how the EBF is computed in each; for reproducibility, the manuscript should indicate whether a shared computational procedure is used or whether family-specific adjustments are required.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The EBF's Savage-Dickey denominator is built from a random-effects distribution estimated from the same data being tested, so the 'Bayes factor' is a data-dependent transform of the fitted variance component rather than a calibrated ratio of marginal likelihoods.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract (method description)]
    "Crucially, it avoids manual prior specification based on external knowledge, as the distribution of random effects is part of the model's lower level and estimated from the data -- yielding an 'empirical' Bayes factor. The EBF uses a Savage-Dickey density ratio, allowing all random effects to be tested using only the full model fit."

    The Savage-Dickey density ratio requires a prior density for the random effects under the full model. The paper states that this density is 'estimated from the data' rather than fixed before seeing y. Hence the prior density evaluated at zero, p(b=0 | θ̂(y)), is a fitted function of the same observations used to compute the posterior density in the numerator. In a normal random-effects model this denominator equals (2π τ̂²)^(-d/2), so the resulting EBF is a transform of the estimated variance component τ̂² -- the very quantity the test is meant to assess. The ratio is therefore not a Bayes factor under a pre-specified model pair; it is an internally constructed statistic whose null distribution is not shown to be calibrated.

full rationale

The abstract transparently labels the procedure 'empirical,' but that label does not remove the circularity in the construction: the prior used in the Savage-Dickey denominator is estimated from the data, so the evidence measure is not a ratio of marginal likelihoods under two fixed hypotheses. The paper's abstract offers simulations on synthetic data, but no analytical or simulated null-calibration evidence is quoted; absent that, the central claim that the EBF 'tests' random effects without a prior is supported only by a data-dependent density ratio. No self-citation or imported-uniqueness step appears in the provided abstract, so the only circular step is the fitted-prior/fitted-prediction construction of the EBF. If the full manuscript provides a theorem showing the empirical-Bayes density ratio is calibrated (or simulations establishing its null distribution), the circularity would be mitigated; with the abstract alone, the construction remains a fitted input called a Bayes-factor test.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method depends primarily on the estimated random effects distribution and on the validity of the Savage-Dickey density ratio at the boundary. No new physical or latent entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Random effects distribution (lower-level prior) = Not specified (estimated from data)
    The abstract says the distribution of random effects is part of the model's lower level and estimated from the data. This estimated distribution is effectively a free functional parameter on which the Bayes factor depends.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The random effects distribution can be consistently estimated from the available data and used as a prior in the Bayes factor calculation.
    Invoked in the abstract when the authors state that the distribution of random effects is estimated from the data and yields an empirical Bayes factor. If this estimate is poor or the lower-level model is misspecified, the Bayes factor will be miscalibrated.
  • domain assumption The Savage-Dickey density ratio is valid for the boundary case where the variance component is zero.
    The method relies on the Savage-Dickey ratio to compute the Bayes factor from a single full model fit; the abstract does not state how boundary issues are handled mathematically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of To Vary or Not To Vary: A Flexible Empirical Bayes Factor for Testing Variance Components." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6TRINVIV

@misc{pith2026250801403,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: To Vary or Not To Vary: A Flexible Empirical Bayes Factor for Testing Variance Components},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6TRINVIV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01403}
}
read the original abstract

Random effects are the gold standard for capturing structural heterogeneity in data, such as spatial dependencies, individual differences, or temporal dependencies. However, testing for their presence is challenging, as it involves a variance component constrained to be non-negative -- a boundary problem. This paper proposes a flexible empirical Bayes factor (EBF) for testing random effects. Rather than testing whether a variance component is zero, the EBF tests the equivalent hypothesis that all random effects are zero. Crucially, it avoids manual prior specification based on external knowledge, as the distribution of random effects is part of the model's lower level and estimated from the data -- yielding an "empirical" Bayes factor. The EBF uses a Savage-Dickey density ratio, allowing all random effects to be tested using only the full model fit. This eliminates the need to fit multiple models with different combinations of random effects. Simulations on synthetic data evaluate the criterion's general behavior. To demonstrate its flexibility, the EBF is applied to generalized linear crossed mixed models, spatial random effects models, dynamic structural equation models, random intercept cross-lagged panel models, and nonlinear mixed effects models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Far from Asymptopia

    abbott2022far APACrefauthors Abbott, M C. \ Machta, B B. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Far from A symptopia Far from A symptopia . arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03343

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    APACrefauthors \ 1998

    akaike1998information APACrefauthors Akaike, H. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle . Selected papers of hirotugu akaike 199--213

    1998

  3. [3]

    \ Ap Gwilym, O

    alsakka2010random APACrefauthors Alsakka, R. \ Ap Gwilym, O. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . A random effects ordered probit model for rating migrations A random effects ordered probit model for rating migrations . Finance Research Letters 7 3 140--147

    2010

  4. [4]

    APACrefauthors \ 2009

    anderson2009officiating APACrefauthors Anderson \ Pierce, D. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Officiating bias: The effect of foul differential on foul calls in NCAA basketball Officiating bias: The effect of foul differential on foul calls in ncaa basketball . Journal of sports sciences 27 7 687--694

    2009

  5. [5]

    , Hamaker, E L

    asparouhov2018dynamic APACrefauthors Asparouhov, T. , Hamaker, E L. \ Muth \'e n, B. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Dynamic structural equation models Dynamic structural equation models . Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 25 3 359--388

    2018

  6. [6]

    \ Kuhn, E

    baey2023vartestnlme APACrefauthors Baey, C. \ Kuhn, E. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . varTestnlme: An R package for variance components testing in linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models vartestnlme: An r package for variance components testing in linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models . Journal of Statistical Software 107 1--32

    2023

  7. [7]

    , Egger, P

    baltagi2013generalized APACrefauthors Baltagi, B H. , Egger, P. \ Pfaffermayr, M. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects . Econometric reviews 32 5-6 650--685

    2013

  8. [8]

    APACrefauthors \ 1957

    Bartlett:1957 APACrefauthors Bartlett, M. APACrefauthors \ 1957 . A comment on D . V . L indley's statistical paradox A comment on D . V . L indley's statistical paradox . Biometrika 44 533--534

    1957

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    , Maechler, M

    bates2015package APACrefauthors Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , Walker, S. , Christensen, R H B. , Singmann, H. Bolker, M B. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Package ‘lme4’ Package ‘lme4’ . convergence 12 1 2

    2015

  2. [10]

    APACrefauthors \ 2006

    berger2006case APACrefauthors Berger, J. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . The case for objective Bayesian analysis The case for objective bayesian analysis . Bayesian Analysis

    2006

  3. [11]

    , Bayarri, M

    berger2014effective APACrefauthors Berger, J. , Bayarri, M. \ Pericchi, L. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . The effective sample size The effective sample size . Econometric Reviews 33 1-4 197--217

    2014

  4. [12]

    \ Delampady, M

    berger1987testing APACrefauthors Berger, J. \ Delampady, M. APACrefauthors \ 1987 . Testing precise hypotheses Testing precise hypotheses . Statistical Science 317--335

    1987

  5. [13]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019

    berrar2019cross APACrefauthors Berrar, D. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Cross-Validation. Cross-validation

    2019

  6. [14]

    , Hedges, L V

    borenstein2010basic APACrefauthors Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L V. , Higgins, J P. \ Rothstein, H R. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-a...

    2010

  7. [15]

    \ Draper, D

    browne2006comparison APACrefauthors Browne, W J. \ Draper, D. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models A comparison of bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models . Bayesian Analysis 1 3...

    2006

  8. [16]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    burkner2017brms APACrefauthors B \"u rkner, P C. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan brms: An r package for bayesian multilevel models using stan . Journal of statistical software 80 1--28

    2017

  9. [17]

    , Gelman, A

    carpenter2017stan APACrefauthors Carpenter, B. , Gelman, A. , Hoffman, M D. , Lee, D. , Goodrich, B. , Betancourt, M. Riddell, A. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Stan: A probabilistic programming language Stan: A probabilistic programming language . Journal of statistical software 76 1--32

    2017

  10. [18]

    APACrefauthors \ 1985

    casella1985introduction APACrefauthors Casella, G. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . An introduction to empirical B ayes data analysis An introduction to empirical B ayes data analysis . The American Statistician 39 2 83--87

    1985

  11. [19]

    , Forbes, F

    celeux2006deviance APACrefauthors Celeux, G. , Forbes, F. , Robert, C P. \ Titterington, D M. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Deviance information criteria for missing data models Deviance information criteria for missing data models . Bayesian Analysis

    2006

  12. [20]

    , Rabe-Hesketh, S

    chung2013variance APACrefauthors Chung, Y. , Rabe-Hesketh, S. , Dorie, V. , Gelman, A. \ Liu, J. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance para...

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    \ Zwinderman, A

    cleophas2008random APACrefauthors Cleophas, T. \ Zwinderman, A. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Random effects models in clinical research. Random effects models in clinical research. International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 46 8 421--427

    2008

  14. [22]

    APACrefauthors \ 2008

    crainiceanu2008likelihood APACrefauthors Crainiceanu, C M. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Likelihood ratio testing for zero variance components in linear mixed models Likelihood ratio testing for zero variance components in linear mixed models . Random effect and latent variable mode...

    2008

  15. [23]

    APACrefauthors \ 1971

    dickey1971weighted APACrefauthors Dickey, J M. APACrefauthors \ 1971 . The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hypotheses on normal location parameters The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hypotheses on normal location parameters . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 204--223

    1971

  16. [24]

    \ Dorie, M V

    dorie2015package APACrefauthors Dorie, V. \ Dorie, M V. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Package ‘blme’ Package ‘blme’ . Bayesian Linear Mixed-Effects Models.[available on internet at https://CRAN. R-project. org/package= blme]

    2015

  17. [25]

    \ Wang, L

    du2020testing APACrefauthors Du, H. \ Wang, L. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Testing variance components in linear mixed modeling using permutation Testing variance components in linear mixed modeling using permutation . Multivariate behavioral research 55 1 120--136

    2020

  18. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 2008

    dunson2008random APACrefauthors Dunson, D B. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Random effect and latent variable model selection Random effect and latent variable model selection . Springer

    2008

  19. [27]

    , Mulder, J

    fox2017bayes APACrefauthors Fox, J P. , Mulder, J. \ Sinharay, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Bayes factor covariance testing in item response models Bayes factor covariance testing in item response models . Psychometrika 82 979--1006

    2017

  20. [28]

    \ Pettitt, A N

    friel2008marginal APACrefauthors Friel, N. \ Pettitt, A N. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 70 3 589--607

    2008

  21. [29]

    \ Sun, D

    garcia2007objective APACrefauthors Garc \' a-Donato, G. \ Sun, D. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Objective priors for hypothesis testing in one-way random effects models Objective priors for hypothesis testing in one-way random effects models . Canadian Journal of Statistics 35 2 303--320

    2007

  22. [30]

    APACrefauthors \ 2006

    gelman2006prior APACrefauthors Gelman, A. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by browne and d...

    2006

  23. [31]

    , Carlin, J B

    gelman2014bayesian APACrefauthors Gelman, A. , Carlin, J B. , Stern, H S. , Dunson, D B. , Vehtari, A. \ Rubin, D B. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Bayesian Data Analysis Bayesian data analysis . Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd (edition)

    2014

  24. [32]

    \ Hill, J

    gelman2006data APACrefauthors Gelman, A. \ Hill, J. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models . Cambridge university press

    2006

  25. [33]

    , Hwang, J

    gelman2014understanding APACrefauthors Gelman, A. , Hwang, J. \ Vehtari, A. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Understanding predictive information criteria for B ayesian models Understanding predictive information criteria for B ayesian models . Statistics and computing 24 6 997--1016

    2014

  26. [34]

    \ Meng, X L

    gelman1998simulating APACrefauthors Gelman, A. \ Meng, X L. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Simulating normalizing constants: From importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling Simulating normalizing constants: From importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling . S...

    1998

  27. [35]

    \ Foster, D P

    george2000calibration APACrefauthors George, E. \ Foster, D P. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Calibration and empirical Bayes variable selection Calibration and empirical bayes variable selection . Biometrika 87 4 731--747

    2000

  28. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 1999

    geweke1999using APACrefauthors Geweke, J. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Using simulation methods for Bayesian econometric models: inference, development, and communication Using simulation methods for bayesian econometric models: inference, development, and communication . Econometr...

    1999

  29. [37]

    \ Wagenmakers, E J

    gronau2019limitations APACrefauthors Gronau, Q F. \ Wagenmakers, E J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Limitations of Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation for model selection Limitations of bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation for model selection . Computational brain & behavior 2 1--11

    2019

  30. [38]

    , Mulder, J

    gu2018approximated APACrefauthors Gu, X. , Mulder, J. \ Hoijtink, H. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses Approximated adjusted fractional bayes factors: A general method for testing informa...

    2018

  31. [39]

    , Gabry, J

    guo2020package APACrefauthors Guo, J. , Gabry, J. , Goodrich, B. \ Weber, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Package ‘rstan’ Package ‘rstan’ . URL https://cran. r―project. org/web/packages/rstan/(2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    , Kuiper, R M

    hamaker2015critique APACrefauthors Hamaker, E L. , Kuiper, R M. \ Grasman, R P. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological methods 20 1 102

    2015

  33. [41]

    , van Hattum, P

    hamaker2011model APACrefauthors Hamaker, E L. , van Hattum, P. , Kuiper, R M. \ Hoijtink, H. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Model selection based on information criteria in multilevel modeling Model selection based on information criteria in multilevel modeling . Handbook of advanced...

    2011

  34. [42]

    \ Dearing, B E

    hartwig1979exploratory APACrefauthors Hartwig, F. \ Dearing, B E. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . Exploratory data analysis Exploratory data analysis \ ( 16). Sage

    1979

  35. [43]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019

    heck2019caveat APACrefauthors Heck, D W. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . A caveat on the Savage--Dickey density ratio: The case of computing Bayes factors for regression parameters A caveat on the savage--dickey density ratio: The case of computing bayes factors for regression paramet...

    2019

  36. [44]

    \ Gelman, A

    hoffman2014no APACrefauthors Hoffman, M D. \ Gelman, A. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. The no-u-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in hamiltonian monte carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 1 1593--1623

    2014

  37. [45]

    , Mulder, J

    hoijtink2019tutorial APACrefauthors Hoijtink, H. , Mulder, J. , Van Lissa, C. \ Gu, X. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the bayes factor. Psychological methods 24 5 539

    2019

  38. [46]

    APACrefauthors \ 1961

    jeffreys1961theory APACrefauthors Jeffreys, H. APACrefauthors \ 1961 . Theory of probability, ed. 3 oxford university press Theory of probability, ed. 3 oxford university press . Figure Click here to access/download

    1961

  39. [47]

    \ Cressie, N

    kang2011bayesian APACrefauthors Kang, E L. \ Cressie, N. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Bayesian inference for the spatial random effects model Bayesian inference for the spatial random effects model . Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 495 972--983

    2011

  40. [48]

    APACrefauthors \ 2020

    kuiper2020 APACrefauthors Kuiper, R. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . ChiBarSq.DiffTest: Chi-bar-square difference test of the RI-CLPM versus the CLPM and more general Chibarsq.difftest: Chi-bar-square difference test of the ri-clpm versus the clpm and more general \ . r.m.kuiper@uu.nl...

    2020

  41. [49]

    APACrefauthors \ 1986

    kung1986fitting APACrefauthors Kung, F H. APACrefauthors \ 1986 . Fitting logistic growth curve with predetermined carrying capacity Fitting logistic growth curve with predetermined carrying capacity . ASA Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section Asa proceedings of the...

    1986

  42. [50]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    leamer2010tantalus APACrefauthors Leamer, E E. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Tantalus on the Road to A symptopia Tantalus on the road to A symptopia . Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 2 31--46

    2010

  43. [51]

    , Paulo, R

    liang2008mixtures APACrefauthors Liang, F. , Paulo, R. , Molina, G. , Clyde, M A. \ Berger, J O. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection Mixtures of g priors for bayesian variable selection . Journal of the American Statistical Association ...

    2008

  44. [52]

    \ Aitkin, M

    liu2008bayes APACrefauthors Liu, C C. \ Aitkin, M. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Bayes factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability Bayes factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability . Journal of Mathematical Psychology 52 6 362--375

    2008

  45. [53]

    , Kuppens, P

    liu2019use APACrefauthors Liu, S. , Kuppens, P. \ Bringmann, L. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . On the use of empirical Bayes estimates as measures of individual traits. Assessment. Advance online publication. On the use of empirical bayes estimates as measures of individual traits. a...

    2019

  46. [54]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    ludbrook2011there APACrefauthors Ludbrook, J. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Is there still a place for Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test in surgical research? Is there still a place for pearson's chi-squared test and fisher's exact test in surgical research? ANZ jou...

    2011

  47. [55]

    , Curtis, R

    mackinnon2022tutorial APACrefauthors Mackinnon, S. , Curtis, R. \ O'Connor, R. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A tutorial in longitudinal measurement invariance and cross-lagged panel models using lavaan A tutorial in longitudinal measurement invariance and cross-lagged panel models u...

    2022

  48. [56]

    \ Robert, C P

    marin2010resolving APACrefauthors Marin, J M. \ Robert, C P. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . On resolving the Savage--Dickey paradox On resolving the savage--dickey paradox . Electronic Journal of Statistics 4 643--654

    2010

  49. [57]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019

    mccullagh2019generalized APACrefauthors McCullagh, P. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Generalized linear models Generalized linear models . Routledge

    2019

  50. [58]

    , Mackinnon, D P

    mcneish2021measurement APACrefauthors McNeish, D. , Mackinnon, D P. , Marsch, L A. \ Poldrack, R A. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Measurement in intensive longitudinal data Measurement in intensive longitudinal data . Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 28 5 807--822

    2021

  51. [59]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    menegaki2011growth APACrefauthors Menegaki, A N. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis Growth and renewable energy in europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis . ...

    2011

  52. [60]

    , Fitzsimmons, E

    merkle2020efficient APACrefauthors Merkle, E C. , Fitzsimmons, E. , Uanhoro, J. \ Goodrich, B. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Efficient Bayesian structural equation modeling in Stan Efficient bayesian structural equation modeling in stan . arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07733

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , Furr, D

    merkle2019bayesian APACrefauthors Merkle, E C. , Furr, D. \ Rabe-Hesketh, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Bayesian comparison of latent variable models: Conditional versus marginal likelihoods Bayesian comparison of latent variable models: Conditional versus marginal likelihoods . ...

    2019

  54. [62]

    \ Rosseel, Y

    merkle2015blavaan APACrefauthors Merkle, E C. \ Rosseel, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . blavaan: Bayesian structural equation models via parameter expansion blavaan: Bayesian structural equation models via parameter expansion . arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05604

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    millar2018conditional APACrefauthors Millar, R B. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Conditional vs marginal estimation of the predictive loss of hierarchical models using WAIC and cross-validation Conditional vs marginal estimation of the predictive loss of hierarchical models using wai...

    2018

  56. [64]

    , Berger, J O

    mulder2021prevalence APACrefauthors Mulder, J. , Berger, J O. , Pe \ n a, V. \ Bayarri, M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . On the prevalence of information inconsistency in normal linear models On the prevalence of information inconsistency in normal linear models . Test 30 103--132

    2021

  57. [65]

    \ Fox, J P

    mulder2013bayesian APACrefauthors Mulder, J. \ Fox, J P. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Bayesian tests on components of the compound symmetry covariance matrix Bayesian tests on components of the compound symmetry covariance matrix . Statistics and Computing 23 1 109--122

    2013

  58. [66]

    \ Fox, J P

    mulder2019bayes APACrefauthors Mulder, J. \ Fox, J P. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Bayes factor testing of multiple intraclass correlations Bayes factor testing of multiple intraclass correlations . Bayesian Analysis

    2019

  59. [67]

    , Friel, N

    mulder2024bayesian APACrefauthors Mulder, J. , Friel, N. \ Leifeld, P. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Bayesian testing of scientific expectations under exponential random graph models Bayesian testing of scientific expectations under exponential random graph models . Social Networks ...

    2024

  60. [68]

    , Wagenmakers, E J

    mulder2022generalization APACrefauthors Mulder, J. , Wagenmakers, E J. \ Marsman, M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A generalization of the S avage- D ickey density ratio for testing equality and order constrained hypotheses A generalization of the S avage- D ickey density ratio for ...

    2022

  61. [69]

    , Williams, D R

    mulder2021bfpack APACrefauthors Mulder, J. , Williams, D R. , Gu, X. , Tomarken, A. , B \"o ing-Messing, F. , Olsson-Collentine, A. Fox, J P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . BFpack: Flexible Bayes factor testing of scientific theories in R Bfpack: Flexible bayes factor testing of scie...

    2021

  62. [70]

    \ Hamaker, E L

    mulder2021three APACrefauthors Mulder, J D. \ Hamaker, E L. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model . Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2...

    2021

  63. [71]

    , Smink, W A

    nielsen2021small APACrefauthors Nielsen, N M. , Smink, W A. \ Fox, J P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Small and negative correlations among clustered observations: Limitations of the linear mixed effects model Small and negative correlations among clustered observations: Limitations...

    2021

  64. [72]

    , Wakefield, J C

    pauler1999bayes APACrefauthors Pauler, D K. , Wakefield, J C. \ Kass, R E. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Bayes factors and approximations for variance component models Bayes factors and approximations for variance component models . Journal of the American Statistical Association 94...

    1999

  65. [73]

    , Bates, D

    pinheiro2007linear APACrefauthors Pinheiro, J. , Bates, D. , DebRoy, S. , Sarkar, D. \ Team, R C. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models . R package version 3 57 1--89

    2007

  66. [74]

    \ Bates, D M

    pinheiro2000fitting APACrefauthors Pinheiro, J. \ Bates, D M. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models Fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models . Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 337--421

    2000

  67. [75]

    APACrefauthors \ 2012

    plummer2012jags APACrefauthors Plummer, M. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . JAGS Version 3.3. 0 user manual. Jags version 3.3. 0 user manual. Lyon, France

    2012

  68. [76]

    , Best, N

    plummer2015package APACrefauthors Plummer, M. , Best, N. , Cowles, K. \ Vines, K. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Package ‘coda’ Package ‘coda’ . URL http://cran. r-project. org/web/packages/coda/coda. pdf, accessed January 25 2015

    2015

  69. [77]

    \ Scott, J G

    polson2012half APACrefauthors Polson, N G. \ Scott, J G. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . On the half-Cauchy prior for a global scale parameter On the half-cauchy prior for a global scale parameter . Bayesian Analysis

    2012

  70. [78]

    APACrefauthors \ 1995

    raftery1995bayesian APACrefauthors Raftery, A E. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Bayesian model selection in social research Bayesian model selection in social research . Sociological methodology 111--163

    1995

  71. [79]

    \ Legler, J

    roback2021beyond APACrefauthors Roback, P. \ Legler, J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Beyond multiple linear regression: applied generalized linear models and multilevel models in R Beyond multiple linear regression: applied generalized linear models and multilevel models in r . Cha...

    2021

  72. [80]

    APACrefauthors \ 1978

    schwarz1978estimating APACrefauthors Schwarz, G. APACrefauthors \ 1978 . Estimating the dimension of a model Estimating the dimension of a model . The annals of statistics 461--464

    1978

  73. [81]

    , Bayarri, M J

    sellke2001calibration APACrefauthors Sellke, T. , Bayarri, M J. \ Berger, J O. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Calibration of values for testing precise null hypotheses Calibration of values for testing precise null hypotheses . The American Statistician 55 1 62--71

    2001

  74. [82]

    APACrefauthors \ 1993

    shao1993linear APACrefauthors Shao, J. APACrefauthors \ 1993 . Linear model selection by cross-validation Linear model selection by cross-validation . Journal of the American statistical Association 88 422 486--494

    1993

  75. [83]

    APACrefauthors \ 2015

    sharpe2015chi APACrefauthors Sharpe, D. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 20 1 8

    2015

  76. [84]

    \ Stern, H S

    sinharay2002sensitivity APACrefauthors Sinharay, S. \ Stern, H S. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . On the sensitivity of Bayes factors to the prior distributions On the sensitivity of bayes factors to the prior distributions . The American Statistician 56 3 196--201

    2002

  77. [85]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    spiegelhalter2001bayesian APACrefauthors Spiegelhalter, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Bayesian methods for cluster randomized trials with continuous responses Bayesian methods for cluster randomized trials with continuous responses . Statistics in medicine 20 3 435--452

    2001

  78. [86]

    , Best, N G

    spiegelhalter2002bayesian APACrefauthors Spiegelhalter, D J. , Best, N G. , Carlin, B P. \ Van Der Linde, A. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit . Journal of the royal statistical society: Series b...

    2002

  79. [87]

    , Garre, F G

    stoel2006likelihood APACrefauthors Stoel, R D. , Garre, F G. , Dolan, C. \ Van Den Wittenboer, G. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. On the likelihood ratio test in structura...

    2006

  80. [88]

    \ Lee, J W

    stram1994variance APACrefauthors Stram, D O. \ Lee, J W. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model . Biometrics 1171--1177

    1994

  81. [89]

    \ Localio, A R

    ten1999empirical APACrefauthors Ten Have, T R. \ Localio, A R. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects parameters in mixed effects logistic regression models Empirical bayes estimation of random effects parameters in mixed effects logistic regressi...

    1999

  82. [90]

    APACrefauthors \ 1977

    tukey1977exploratory APACrefauthors Tukey, J W. APACrefauthors \ 1977 . Exploratory data analysis Exploratory data analysis \ ( 2). Reading, MA

    1977

  83. [91]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    vanpaemel2010prior APACrefauthors Vanpaemel, W. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the Bayes factor Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the bayes factor . Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54 6 491--498

    2010

  84. [92]

    \ Molenberghs, G

    verbeke2012linear APACrefauthors Verbeke, G. \ Molenberghs, G. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Linear mixed models in practice: a SAS-oriented approach Linear mixed models in practice: a sas-oriented approach \ ( 126). Springer Science & Business Media

    2012

  85. [93]

    \ Wasserman, L

    verdinelli1995computing APACrefauthors Verdinelli, I. \ Wasserman, L. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Computing Bayes factors using a generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio Computing bayes factors using a generalization of the savage-dickey density ratio . Journal of the Am...

    1995

  86. [94]

    \ Fox, J

    verhagen2013bayesian APACrefauthors Verhagen, A. \ Fox, J. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Bayesian tests of measurement invariance Bayesian tests of measurement invariance . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 66 3 383--401

    2013

  87. [95]

    , Leenders, R

    vieira2023bayesian APACrefauthors Vieira, F. , Leenders, R. , McFarland, D. \ Mulder, J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . A B ayesian actor-oriented multilevel relational event model with hypothesis testing procedures. A B ayesian actor-oriented multilevel relational event model with h...

    2023

  88. [96]

    , Leenders, R

    vieira2024fast APACrefauthors Vieira, F. , Leenders, R. \ Mulder, J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Fast meta-analytic approximations for relational event models: Applications to data streams and multilevel data Fast meta-analytic approximations for relational event models: Applicati...

    2024

  89. [97]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007

    wagenmakers2007practical APACrefauthors Wagenmakers, E J. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values . Psychonomic bulletin & review 14 5 779--804

    2007

  90. [98]

    APACrefauthors \ 1999

    weakliem1999critique APACrefauthors Weakliem, D L. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection A critique of the bayesian information criterion for model selection . Sociological Methods & Research 27 3 359--397

    1999

  91. [99]

    , Grasman, R P

    wetzels2010encompassing APACrefauthors Wetzels, R. , Grasman, R P. \ Wagenmakers, E J. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage--Dickey density ratio An encompassing prior generalization of the savage--dickey density ratio . Computational Stat...

    2010

  92. [100]

    , Rast, P

    williams2020comparing APACrefauthors Williams, D R. , Rast, P. , Pericchi, L R. \ Mulder, J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Comparing Gaussian graphical models with the posterior predictive distribution and Bayesian model selection. Comparing gaussian graphical models with the poster...

    2020

  93. [101]

    APACrefauthors \ 1986

    zellner1986assessing APACrefauthors Zellner, A. APACrefauthors \ 1986 . On assessing prior distributions and Bayesian regression analysis with g-prior distributions On assessing prior distributions and bayesian regression analysis with g-prior distributions . Bayesian inferenc...

    1986

  94. [102]

    \ Lin, X

    zhang2008variance APACrefauthors Zhang, D. \ Lin, X. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Variance component testing in generalized linear mixed models for longitudinal/clustered data and other related topics Variance component testing in generalized linear mixed models for longitudinal/cl...

    2008

  95. [103]

    , Tao, J

    zhang2019bayesian APACrefauthors Zhang, X. , Tao, J. , Wang, C. \ Shi, N Z. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Bayesian model selection methods for multilevel IRT models: A comparison of five DIC-based indices Bayesian model selection methods for multilevel irt models: A comparison of fi...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.