Local interface effects modulate global charge order and optical properties of 1T-TaS$_2$/1H-WSe$_2$ heterostructures

Aaron Bostwick; Archana Raja; Chris Jozwiak; D. Kwabena Bediako; Eli Rotenberg; Karen C. Bustillo; Katherine Inzani; Kenji Watanabe; Lilia S. Xie; Madeline Van Winkle

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 8 references

Local interface effects modulate global charge order and optical properties of 1T-TaS$_2$/1H-WSe$_2$ heterostructures

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stacking monolayer WSe2 on thin 1T-TaS2 suppresses the TaS2 charge-density-wave state through twist-independent interfacial charge transfer and, in nearly aligned stacks, through moiré strain, while the same interface changes WSe2 exciton…

desk verdict Solid baseline result on CDW suppression via WSe2 contact; the twist-dependent strain mechanism is plausible but under-supported by sample statistics and indirect strain evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01512 v1 pith:RRKBFRVT submitted 2025-08-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Samra Husremović , Valerie S. McGraw , Medha Dandu , Lilia S. Xie , Sae Hee Ryu , Oscar Gonzalez , Shannon S. Fender , Madeline Van Winkle

show 9 more authors

Karen C. Bustillo Takashi Taniguchi Kenji Watanabe Chris Jozwiak Aaron Bostwick Eli Rotenberg Archana Raja Katherine Inzani D. Kwabena Bediako

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

keywords chargedensitywave1T-TaS21H-WSe2vanderWaalsheterostructuremoiréstraininterfacialtransferexcitondynamicsCDWphasetransition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a van der Waals interface can be used to deliberately alter the collective electronic order of a charge-density-wave material while also changing the optical response of the semiconductor on top. It reports that placing monolayer 1H-WSe2 on few-layer 1T-TaS2 lowers the temperature of the incommensurate-to-nearly-commensurate CDW transition, with the effect growing as the TaS2 layer gets thinner. Charge transfer from WSe2 to the adjacent TaS2 layer, which the density-functional calculations find to be nearly independent of twist angle, accounts for the baseline suppression; stronger suppression in nearly aligned stacks is attributed to strain from moiré lattice reconstruction. On the WSe2 side, the same interface broadens and quenches the A1s exciton and shifts its energy in a twist-dependent way, pointing to faster exciton dissociation and moiré-modified screening. If correct, heterostructuring offers a single stack in which a switchable CDW phase and a tunable light-emitting layer influence each other.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two local mechanisms and a device geometry that isolates them. The device places monolayer 1H-WSe2 over part of an hBN-encapsulated 1T-TaS2 flake, so the same crystal provides a reference region (R1, bare TaS2) and a heterostructure region (R2) whose transport, Raman, and optical responses can be compared directly. Density-functional charge-density-difference calculations on three-layer TaS2/WSe2 stacks show electron transfer into the single TaS2 layer touching WSe2 that is nearly independent of twist angle or CDW phase, supplying the twist-independent suppression channel. Dark-field transmission electron microscopy of nearly aligned samples reveals reconstructed moiré domains, and Raman spectra of WSe2 in the same samples show an E' mode split and redshift consistent with strain, supplying the twist-dependent channel; a 17.9-degree twisted DFT cell is used to argue that charge transfer itself does not change much with alignment.

What would settle it

Direct strain mapping of the TaS2 layer in a nearly aligned TaS2/WSe2 stack by four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy would settle it: if no periodic strain field is present in TaS2 while CDW suppression and WSe2 exciton broadening remain stronger than in misaligned stacks, the moiré-strain explanation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that local interface effects govern a global phase transition in a stacked van der Waals system. In 1T-TaS2/1H-WSe2 heterostructures, the metallic incommensurate CDW to nearly commensurate CDW transition temperature in thin 1T-TaS2 is measurably lowered by contact with monolayer WSe2, by an amount that increases as the TaS2 thickness decreases. The paper identifies two distinct mechanisms: twist-angle-independent interfacial charge transfer that dopes only the TaS2 layer directly at the interface and disrupts CDW order through altered ionicity and electron-phonon coupling, and, in nearly aligned stacks, intralayer strain from moiré relaxation that further disorders the CDW. On the WSe2 side, the heterostructure broadens the A1s exciton resonance, quenches photoluminescence, and shifts exciton energies in a twist-dependent manner, consistent with ultrafast charge transfer and moiré-strain-induced band renormalization. The paper concludes that charge transfer sets the overall suppression trend while moiré strain amplifies it at small twist angles, so that one heterostructure can concurrently tailor the CDW phase of TaS2 and the optical properties of WSe2.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's twist-dependent conclusion relies on attributing the extra suppression seen in nearly aligned stacks to periodic strain from lattice reconstruction at the interface, a strain that is inferred from microscope and Raman signals rather than measured directly in the TaS2 layers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Thin 1T-TaS2 contacted by a monolayer semiconductor will show a lower IC-CDW to NC-CDW transition temperature than the same flake alone, because interfacial charge transfer acts locally but propagates through interlayer coupling.
Nearly aligned TaS2/WSe2 stacks suppress CDW order more strongly than misaligned stacks of the same thickness, because moiré reconstruction adds periodic strain on top of charge transfer.
The same interface shortens WSe2 exciton lifetimes and quenches photoluminescence through charge transfer, with faster dissociation and additional spectral shifts when the layers are nearly aligned.
Thickness acts as a dial: thinner TaS2 layers respond more strongly to the interface, so few-layer samples are the regime where the CDW transition is most tunable.
A CDW material and a semiconductor in one stack can be coupled so that the electrical state of TaS2 and the optical state of WSe2 are engineered together.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: because the computed charge transfer is confined to the interfacial TaS2 layer and nearly independent of twist, the same suppression mechanism should appear for other monolayer semiconductors with suitable band alignment, making interfacial doping a generic knob for CDW materials.
Editorial inference: if moiré strain is indeed the amplifier, then deliberately adjusting lattice mismatch or twist to strengthen reconstruction, or applying external strain, should produce predictable continuous shifts of the CDW transition temperature; this is a testable design rule the paper does not itself demonstrate.
Editorial inference: the twist-dependent exciton shifts plus the unexplained sub-A1s absorption peak in the nearly aligned sample suggest that moiré potentials could confine or steer excitons in these stacks, but the paper leaves the origin of that peak open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's baseline result is real: putting monolayer WSe2 on thin 1T-TaS2 suppresses CDW order in a thickness-dependent way, and the internal R1/R2 geometry means the comparison is controlled within each device. That part is convincing. The twist-dependent extra suppression is the softer link: it rests on two pairs of samples, with twist angles partly inferred from flake edges, and the supporting strain evidence is indirect—dark-field TEM shows reconstruction but does not quantify strain in the TaS2, and the WSe2 Raman splitting reports on the WSe2 layer, not on TaS2. The authors themselves are appropriately cautious, using language like "seemingly" and "plausible." Still, the causal chain (charge transfer independent of twist plus moiré strain in near-aligned stacks) is not directly proven.

What is actually new: a systematic thickness and twist scan for TaS2/WSe2 heterostructures, with concurrent observation that the same interface modifies both the TaS2 CDW and the WSe2 exciton behavior. That dual tuning is a contribution, and the paper does it honestly. The DFT charge-transfer calculations are standard but well done; the finding that transfer is localized to the interfacial TaS2 layer and roughly twist-independent is useful. The strain inference from WSe2 Raman splitting is consistent with the moiré relaxation literature, and the absence of hybridization at the K point is a clean negative result.

The weakest spots are the sample statistics and the fixed twisted unit cell. With one device per thickness and two nearly aligned versus two misaligned samples, the twist dependence is not over-determined. The 17.9° DFT cell was kept rigid, so twist independence of charge transfer is computed, not tested against a relaxed moiré cell. The authors should have reported integrated charge-transfer values; the plots look similar, but "similar" is not quantified. These are fixable in revision, not fatal.

I agree with the reader's conditional verdict. The paper is not circular, the internal controls are good, and the central observation survives. A serious referee could ask for more samples and a relaxed twisted cell, but this is a within-subfield advance that deserves referee time rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined transport, Raman, nanoARPES, TEM, and DFT study of vertical heterostructures of thin 1T-TaS2 with monolayer 1H-WSe2. The central claim is a two-step mechanism: interfacial charge transfer from WSe2 into the adjacent TaS2 layer, independent of twist angle, disorders the CDW and lowers the IC-CDW to NC-CDW transition temperature, while moiré relaxation strain in nearly aligned stacks adds further CDW suppression. The authors also report twist-dependent modifications of the WSe2 exciton response, including Raman mode splitting, reflection-contrast broadening, photoluminescence quenching, and shifts of the A1s exciton energy. The main experimental evidence for CDW suppression consists of internal comparisons between TaS2-only (R1) and TaS2/WSe2 (R2) regions of the same device, with the effect scaling with TaS2 thickness. DFT charge-density-difference calculations are used to argue that charge transfer is localized to the interfacial TaS2 layer and is similar across CDW and twist configurations, and dark-field TEM plus WSe2 Raman measurements are used to infer moiré reconstruction strain in nearly aligned samples.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, the paper demonstrates a practical route to simultaneously tune the global CDW phase of a correlated material and the optical properties of a monolayer semiconductor through local interface engineering. The internal R1/R2 control geometry is a genuine strength: it removes much of the sample-to-sample variability that often plagues heterostructure studies, and the thickness dependence of the suppression is consistent with a local interface effect. The combination of transport, Raman, nanoARPES, and DFT is appropriate and the paper is generally careful to distinguish measured trends from inferred mechanisms. The less secure part is the twist-dependent enhancement: the attribution to moiré strain in TaS2 is indirect, the twist comparison rests on only two aligned versus two misaligned samples with one device per configuration, and the twisted DFT cell was not relaxed. These gaps do not undermine the baseline observation that WSe2 contact suppresses CDW order, but they do leave the explicit twist-strain component of the central claim in need of further support.

major comments (3)

[Section 1.3, Fig. 5, Fig. 6a] The claim that moiré relaxation strain causes the additional CDW suppression in nearly aligned stacks is supported only indirectly. The dark-field TEM images in Fig. 5 show reconstructed domains but do not quantify strain fields or establish that the reconstructed layer is TaS2, and the WSe2 E'/A'_1 Raman splitting in Fig. 6a reports on the WSe2 layer, not on the TaS2 layer. The assumption that misaligned samples have no reconstruction is asserted rather than checked. Please provide a quantitative strain estimate in the TaS2 layer (e.g., from dark-field TEM analysis, four-dimensional STEM, or reconstruction modeling) or explicitly temper the causal attribution to a plausible hypothesis.
[Section 3.13, Fig. 4] The DFT support for twist-independent charge transfer rests on a fixed 17.9-degree twisted cell and on qualitative charge-density-difference plots; no integrated or Bader charge values are reported. Because the twisted structure was not relaxed, the calculation does not model a reconstructed interface, and because no numbers are given, the statement that charge transfer is 'similar' across configurations is not quantitatively supported. Please report integrated charge transfer per formula unit for each configuration and either relax the twisted cell or justify why relaxation is unnecessary for the large-twist case, and discuss whether small-twist reconstruction could alter the charge transfer.
[Section 1.2, Fig. 3d] The twist-angle dependence is based on comparing only two nearly aligned samples (S1, S2) with two misaligned samples (S4, S5), with one sample per thickness and alignment, and with twist angles for S2-S4 inferred from optical edge alignment rather than measured by diffraction. The claim that nearly aligned samples show systematically stronger CDW suppression would be substantially strengthened by additional devices and by direct twist determination for all samples; as it stands, the comparison is statistically thin and should be presented as preliminary evidence.

minor comments (6)

[Section 1.2 heading] The heading contains a typo: 'supression' should be 'suppression'.
[Section 1.1, Fig. 2f] The text referring to isoenergy cuts says 'highlighted by arrows in Figure 3f' but the figure being discussed is Figure 2f; the cross-reference appears to be a typo.
[Fig. 1] Figure 1 has two panels labeled (d): the Delta-T_CDW plot and the schematic below it. Please relabel the schematic to avoid ambiguity.
[Throughout] The notation for the material is inconsistent: '1T TaS2' and '1T-TaS2' are used interchangeably. Please standardize.
[Section 1.4, Fig. 6b] The additional low-energy peak in the reflection contrast of S2 is acknowledged to require further investigation; the conclusion should present this feature as tentative, not as an established moiré signature.
[Section 1.1, Fig. 2c-f] The nanoARPES interpretation that CDW commensuration is stronger in R1 than in R2 is explicitly tentative because of signal attenuation from the overlying WSe2; this caveat should be repeated where the result is cited in the conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: CDW suppression and its twist enhancement rest on independent in-paper measurements (transport, Raman, TEM, nanoARPES) and first-principles DFT, with only minor corroborated self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The central claim has two components: (1) twist-independent interfacial charge transfer suppresses CDW order in thin 1T-TaS2, and (2) moiré relaxation strain adds suppression in nearly aligned stacks. Component (1) is supported by internal controls, namely transport comparison of R2 (TaS2/WSe2) against R1 (TaS2-only) regions of the same device (Fig. 1), CDW Raman-mode attenuation and broadening (Fig. 3), and nanoARPES band broadening (Fig. 2), together with DFT charge-transfer calculations (Fig. 4) that use standard first-principles methods (VASP, PBEsol, Hubbard U taken from external ref. 92, not fitted to the transport data). No parameter is fitted to the measured suppression and then renamed a prediction; the DFT charge transfer is computed independently of the transport interpretation. Component (2) is an inference from dark-field TEM reconstruction contrast (Fig. 5) and strain-sensitive WSe2 E'/A'1 Raman splitting (Fig. 6a); the TaS2 CDW suppression is measured from separate low-frequency CDW Raman modes, so the strain evidence and the CDW response are not the same observable. These two probes give the strain mechanism independent in-paper support; the facts that strain in the TaS2 layers is not directly measured and that the 17.9° twisted DFT cell was fixed rather than relaxed (Sec. 3.13) are acknowledged limitations that affect confidence in the mechanism but do not constitute circular reasoning. The only self-citations touching load-bearing inputs are (a) the zigzag-edge calibration for optically inferred twist angles (Sec. 3.5, refs. 8, 79, 80), which is corroborated by prior cross-sectional TEM of over a dozen flakes, by agreement within 2° of independent TEM/SHG measurements reported in this paper, and by external MoS2 work (ref. 81); and (b) the moiré lattice-dilation framework (ref. 42, overlapping authorship), which is background physics rather than the evidence for reconstruction in these samples, since that evidence is the paper's own dark-field TEM and Raman data. Neither self-citation carries an unverified premise to which the central claim reduces, so the results are not forced by definition or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its central claim rests on two imported assumptions: the reliability of optical edge-based twist angles and the DFT+U charge distribution. The twisted DFT cell is fixed rather than relaxed, so the twist-independence of charge transfer is less thoroughly tested than the aligned cases.

free parameters (1)

Hubbard U on Ta d orbitals (Dudarev) = 2.86 eV (from ref [92])
Used in spin-polarized DFT (Sec. 3.13) to open the band gap and set the CDW charge distribution; the computed charge transfer magnitudes depend on this value.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Edge-based twist angle determination from flake edges identifies zigzag orientation within about 2 degrees.
Invoked in Section 3.5 and used to assign twist angles for D2-D4 and S2-S4; relies on prior TEM/SHG calibration.
domain assumption DFT with Hubbard U of 2.86 eV on Ta d orbitals correctly captures the CDW charge distribution and band gap.
U is taken from ref [92] and used in Section 3.13; the charge transfer magnitude and band structure depend on this choice.
domain assumption Lattice reconstruction occurs in nearly aligned heterobilayers and produces intralayer strain; dark-field TEM contrast indicates such domains.
Used in Section 1.3 and Figure 5 to link TEM reconstruction to CDW suppression; based on prior moiré literature (refs 41,42).
domain assumption Charge density difference computed from fixed fragments reliably reports interfacial charge transfer.
Used in Section 3.11 and Figure 4; fragments are not relaxed, which could perturb the charge transfer magnitude.
domain assumption 1H-WSe2 does not contribute significantly to the measured transport.
Stated in Section 3.7, justifying that Rxx in region R2 reflects TaS2 only.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local interface effects modulate global charge order and optical properties of 1T-TaS$_2$/1H-WSe$_2$ heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRKBFRVT

@misc{pith2026250801512,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local interface effects modulate global charge order and optical properties of 1T-TaS$_2$/1H-WSe$_2$ heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRKBFRVT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01512}
}

abstract

1T-TaS$_2$ is a layered charge density wave (CDW) crystal exhibiting sharp phase transitions and associated resistance changes. These resistance steps could be exploited for information storage, underscoring the importance of controlling and tuning CDW states. Given the importance of out-of-plane interactions in 1T-TaS$_2$, modulating interlayer interactions by heterostructuring is a promising method for tailoring CDW phase transitions. In this work, we investigate the optical and electronic properties of heterostructures comprising 1T-TaS$_2$ and monolayer 1H-WSe$_2$. By systematically varying the thickness of 1T-TaS$_2$ and its azimuthal alignment with 1H-WSe$_2$, we find that intrinsic moir\'e strain and interfacial charge transfer introduce CDW disorder in 1T-TaS$_2$ and modify the CDW ordering temperature. Furthermore, our studies reveal that the interlayer alignment impacts the exciton dynamics in 1H-WSe$_2$, indicating that heterostructuring can concurrently tailor the electronic phases in 1T-TaS$_2$ and the optical properties of 1H-WSe$_2$. This work presents a promising approach for engineering optoelectronic behavior of heterostructures that integrate CDW materials and semiconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.01512 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Electronic measurements of CDW phase transitions in 1H WSe2/1T TaS2 heterostructures. (a) Schematic of 1H WSe2/1T TaS2 heterostructure device for transport measurements. Each 1T TaS2 crystal is fully encapsulated in hBN and partially covered with monolayer 1H WSe2 , yielding a 1T TaS2–only region (region R1) and a 1T TaS2/1H WSe2 region (region R2). Electrical contact with the 1T TaS2 crystal is made using pre-patt… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Electronic band structure of 1T TaS2 and its heterostructure with 1H WSe2 . (a) Optical micrograph with the heterostrucutre components outline and marked. Note, the solid yellow line denotes monolayer WSe2, while the dashed yellow line encloses the multilayer flake region. The sample was prepared on Si, and the twist angle between 1T TaS2 and 1H WSe2 was estimated to be ≈ 2 ◦ from the edge alignment of flakes in opt… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Thickness and twist dependence of CDW ordering in 1T TaS2/1H WSe2 heterostructures. (a) Raman spectra measured at 100 K (left) and 300 K (right) for nearly aligned 1T TaS2/1H WSe2 heterostructures consisting of 3-, 6-, and 40-layer 1T TaS2 (S1–S3). (b) Top: Raman peak shifts (∆p) of peaks A and B (labeled in a), calculated as the heterostructure peak position minus the 1T TaS2 peak position for S1–S3 at 100 K. Midd… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Local charge transfer characteristics across CDW phases and twist angles. Charge transfer (top) and the corresponding planar and macroscopic averages per formula unit (bottom) for 3-layer 1T TaS2 interfaced with monolayer 1H WSe2 for: an azimuthally nearly aligned het…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Lattice reconstruction of nearly aligned samples. (a,b) Dark-field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) lattice reconstruction of nearly aligned samples S1 (a) and D1 (b). Micrographs were constructed from the closest first-order peaks of 1T TaS2 and 1H WSe2 . Scale…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Effects of heterostructuring on the optical properties of 1H WSe2 . (a–c) Raman spectra (a), reflection contrast (b), and photoluminescence (c) for the azimuthally misaligned heterostructure S5 (top) and the azimuthally nearly aligned heterostructure S2 (bottom). The …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

8 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[6]

Raman and pho- toluminescence spectra of two-dimensional nanocrystallites of monolayer WS2 and WSe2

(63) Shi, W.; Lin, M.-L.; Tan, Q.-H.; Qiao, X.-F.; Zhang, J.; Tan, P.-H. Raman and pho- toluminescence spectra of two-dimensional nanocrystallites of monolayer WS2 and WSe2. 2D Materials2016, 3, 025016. (64) del Corro, E.; Terrones, H.; Elias, A.; Fantini, C.; Feng, S.; Nguyen, M. A.; Mallouk, T. E.; Terrones, M.; Pimenta, M. A. Excited excitonic states i...

work page 2023
[413]

Interlayer coupling and the phase transition mechanism of stacked MoS2/TaS2 heterostructures discovered using temperature dependent Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy

(23) Chen, M.; Zhou, B.; Wang, F.; Xu, L.; Jiang, K.; Shang, L.; Hu, Z.; Chu, J. Interlayer coupling and the phase transition mechanism of stacked MoS2/TaS2 heterostructures discovered using temperature dependent Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy. RSC Advances2018, 8, 21968–21974. (24) Wang, Z.; Chu, L.; Li, L.; Yang, M.; Wang, J.; Eda, G.; Loh, K....

work page 2019
[1403]

Electrical, structural and magnetic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS2

(6) Fazekas, P.; Tosatti, E. Electrical, structural and magnetic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS2. Philosophical Magazine B1979, 39, 229–244. (7) Hovden, R.; Tsen, A. W.; Liu, P.; Savitzky, B. H.; Baggari, I. E.; Liu, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, Y.; Kim, P.; Pasupathy, A. N.; Kourkoutis, L. F. Atomic lattice disorder in charge-density-wave phases of exfoliated d...

work page 2023
[1994]

Topical review: recent progress of charge density waves in 2D transition metal dichalcogenide-based heterojunctions and their applications

(2) Xu, Z.; Yang, H.; Song, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y. Topical review: recent progress of charge density waves in 2D transition metal dichalcogenide-based heterojunctions and their applications. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 492001. (3) Mihailovic, D.; Svetin, D.; Vaskivskyi, I.; Venturini, R.; Lipovšek, B...

work page 2021
[2989]

M.; Zhu, L.; Nie, Z.; Li, Q

(43) Zhao, W. M.; Zhu, L.; Nie, Z.; Li, Q. Y.; Wang, Q. W.; Dou, L. G.; Hu, J. G.; Xian, L.; Meng, S.; Li, S. C. Moiré enhanced charge density wave state in Twisted 1T-TiTe2/1T- TiSe2 Heterostructures. Nature Materials2021, 21, 284–289. (44) Nicholson, C. W.; Petocchi, F.; Salzmann, B.; Witteveen, C.; Rumo, M.; Kremer, G.; Ivashko, O.; Von Rohr, F. O.; We...

work page 2020
[4215]

On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides

(53) Rossnagel, K. On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2011, 23, 213001. (54) Sohrt, C.; Stange, A.; Bauer, M.; Rossnagel, K. How fast can a Peierls–Mott insulator be melted?Faraday discussions2014, 171, 243–257. (55) Yang, H. F. et al. Visualization of chiral electr...

work page 1976
[4966]

Evolution of high-frequency Raman modes and their doping dependence in twisted bilayer MoS2

(71) Debnath, R.; Maity, I.; Biswas, R.; Raghunathan, V.; Jain, M.; Ghosh, A. Evolution of high-frequency Raman modes and their doping dependence in twisted bilayer MoS2. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 17272–17280. (72) Fan, S.; Yun, S. J.; Yu, W. J.; Lee, Y. H. Tailoring quantum tunneling in a vanadium- doped WSe2/SnSe2 heterostructure. Advanced Science2020, 7, 190...

work page 2020
[8988]

H.; Maity, I.; Jain, M

(82) Naik, S.; Naik, M. H.; Maity, I.; Jain, M. Twister: construction and structural relax- ation of commensurate moiré superlattices.Computer Physics Communications2022, 271, 108184. (83) Naik, M. H.; Jain, M. Ultraflatbands and shear solitons in moiré patterns of twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides.Physical Review Letters2018,121, Publisher...

work page 2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [6]

Raman and pho- toluminescence spectra of two-dimensional nanocrystallites of monolayer WS2 and WSe2

(63) Shi, W.; Lin, M.-L.; Tan, Q.-H.; Qiao, X.-F.; Zhang, J.; Tan, P.-H. Raman and pho- toluminescence spectra of two-dimensional nanocrystallites of monolayer WS2 and WSe2. 2D Materials2016, 3, 025016. (64) del Corro, E.; Terrones, H.; Elias, A.; Fantini, C.; Feng, S.; Nguyen, M. A.; Mallouk, T. E.; Terrones, M.; Pimenta, M. A. Excited excitonic states i...

work page 2023

[2] [413]

Interlayer coupling and the phase transition mechanism of stacked MoS2/TaS2 heterostructures discovered using temperature dependent Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy

(23) Chen, M.; Zhou, B.; Wang, F.; Xu, L.; Jiang, K.; Shang, L.; Hu, Z.; Chu, J. Interlayer coupling and the phase transition mechanism of stacked MoS2/TaS2 heterostructures discovered using temperature dependent Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy. RSC Advances2018, 8, 21968–21974. (24) Wang, Z.; Chu, L.; Li, L.; Yang, M.; Wang, J.; Eda, G.; Loh, K....

work page 2019

[3] [1403]

Electrical, structural and magnetic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS2

(6) Fazekas, P.; Tosatti, E. Electrical, structural and magnetic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS2. Philosophical Magazine B1979, 39, 229–244. (7) Hovden, R.; Tsen, A. W.; Liu, P.; Savitzky, B. H.; Baggari, I. E.; Liu, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, Y.; Kim, P.; Pasupathy, A. N.; Kourkoutis, L. F. Atomic lattice disorder in charge-density-wave phases of exfoliated d...

work page 2023

[4] [1994]

Topical review: recent progress of charge density waves in 2D transition metal dichalcogenide-based heterojunctions and their applications

(2) Xu, Z.; Yang, H.; Song, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y. Topical review: recent progress of charge density waves in 2D transition metal dichalcogenide-based heterojunctions and their applications. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 492001. (3) Mihailovic, D.; Svetin, D.; Vaskivskyi, I.; Venturini, R.; Lipovšek, B...

work page 2021

[5] [2989]

M.; Zhu, L.; Nie, Z.; Li, Q

(43) Zhao, W. M.; Zhu, L.; Nie, Z.; Li, Q. Y.; Wang, Q. W.; Dou, L. G.; Hu, J. G.; Xian, L.; Meng, S.; Li, S. C. Moiré enhanced charge density wave state in Twisted 1T-TiTe2/1T- TiSe2 Heterostructures. Nature Materials2021, 21, 284–289. (44) Nicholson, C. W.; Petocchi, F.; Salzmann, B.; Witteveen, C.; Rumo, M.; Kremer, G.; Ivashko, O.; Von Rohr, F. O.; We...

work page 2020

[6] [4215]

On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides

(53) Rossnagel, K. On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter2011, 23, 213001. (54) Sohrt, C.; Stange, A.; Bauer, M.; Rossnagel, K. How fast can a Peierls–Mott insulator be melted?Faraday discussions2014, 171, 243–257. (55) Yang, H. F. et al. Visualization of chiral electr...

work page 1976

[7] [4966]

Evolution of high-frequency Raman modes and their doping dependence in twisted bilayer MoS2

(71) Debnath, R.; Maity, I.; Biswas, R.; Raghunathan, V.; Jain, M.; Ghosh, A. Evolution of high-frequency Raman modes and their doping dependence in twisted bilayer MoS2. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 17272–17280. (72) Fan, S.; Yun, S. J.; Yu, W. J.; Lee, Y. H. Tailoring quantum tunneling in a vanadium- doped WSe2/SnSe2 heterostructure. Advanced Science2020, 7, 190...

work page 2020

[8] [8988]

H.; Maity, I.; Jain, M

(82) Naik, S.; Naik, M. H.; Maity, I.; Jain, M. Twister: construction and structural relax- ation of commensurate moiré superlattices.Computer Physics Communications2022, 271, 108184. (83) Naik, M. H.; Jain, M. Ultraflatbands and shear solitons in moiré patterns of twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides.Physical Review Letters2018,121, Publisher...

work page 2020