Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learned Adaptive Indexing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.03471 v1 pith:HRQ3BRV6 submitted 2025-08-05 cs.DB

Learned Adaptive Indexing

classification cs.DB
keywords indexingquerylearnedadaptiveindexesworkloadperformanceapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Indexes can significantly improve search performance in relational databases. However, if the query workload changes frequently or new data updates occur continuously, it may not be worthwhile to build a conventional index upfront for query processing. Adaptive indexing is a technique in which an index gets built on the fly as a byproduct of query processing. In recent years, research in database indexing has taken a new direction where machine learning models are employed for the purpose of indexing. These indexes, known as learned indexes, can be more efficient compared to traditional indexes such as B+-tree in terms of memory footprints and query performance. However, a learned index has to be constructed upfront and requires training the model in advance, which becomes a challenge in dynamic situations when workload changes frequently. To the best of our knowledge, no learned indexes exist yet for adaptive indexing. We propose a novel learned approach for adaptive indexing. It is built on the fly as queries are submitted and utilizes learned models for indexing data. To enhance query performance, we employ a query workload prediction technique that makes future workload projection based on past workload data. We have evaluated our learned adaptive indexing approach against existing adaptive indexes for various query workloads. Our results show that our approach performs better than others in most cases, offering 1.2x - 5.6x improvement in query performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.