pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08645 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-12 · 💻 cs.CL

Quick on the Uptake: Eliciting Implicit Intents from Human Demonstrations for Personalized Mobile-Use Agents

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords mobile-use agentsintention alignmenthuman demonstrationsimplicit intentspersonalized agentsMobileIAR datasetquery rewritinghabit repository
0
0 comments X

The pith

IFRAgent extracts implicit user preferences from demonstrations to build personalized habit repositories for mobile agents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper first gathers the MobileIAR dataset to measure how closely agent actions match human intentions. It then introduces IFRAgent, which processes explicit flows into a library of standard operating procedures and implicit flows into a user-specific habit repository. A SOP extractor, retrieval-augmented generation, and query rewriter turn vague inputs into personalized action sequences. Experiments report average gains of 6.79 percent in intention alignment and 5.30 percent in step completion over baselines. The method targets agents that follow individual habits without needing repeated explicit instructions from users.

Core claim

By analyzing explicit intention flows from human demonstrations to construct a query-level vector library of standard operating procedures and analyzing implicit intention flows to build a user-level habit repository, IFRAgent leverages a SOP extractor combined with retrieval-augmented generation and a query rewriter to generate personalized query and SOP from a raw ambiguous query, enhancing the alignment between mobile-use agents and human intent.

What carries the argument

Intention Flow Recognition, which separates explicit step sequences from implicit personal preferences to construct both SOP libraries and user habit repositories.

Load-bearing premise

That personal preferences observed in a fixed collection of demonstrations remain stable enough to generalize to new tasks without ongoing user feedback or explicit updates.

What would settle it

Running the trained agents on new demonstrations where users have altered their typical habits and checking whether alignment rates fall back to baseline levels.

read the original abstract

As multimodal large language models advance rapidly, the automation of mobile tasks has become increasingly feasible through the use of mobile-use agents that mimic human interactions from graphical user interface. To further enhance mobile-use agents, previous studies employ demonstration learning to improve mobile-use agents from human demonstrations. However, these methods focus solely on the explicit intention flows of humans (e.g., step sequences) while neglecting implicit intention flows (e.g., personal preferences), which makes it difficult to construct personalized mobile-use agents. In this work, to evaluate the \textbf{I}ntention \textbf{A}lignment \textbf{R}ate between mobile-use agents and humans, we first collect \textbf{MobileIAR}, a dataset containing human-intent-aligned actions and ground-truth actions. This enables a comprehensive assessment of the agents' understanding of human intent. Then we propose \textbf{IFRAgent}, a framework built upon \textbf{I}ntention \textbf{F}low \textbf{R}ecognition from human demonstrations. IFRAgent analyzes explicit intention flows from human demonstrations to construct a query-level vector library of standard operating procedures (SOP), and analyzes implicit intention flows to build a user-level habit repository. IFRAgent then leverages a SOP extractor combined with retrieval-augmented generation and a query rewriter to generate personalized query and SOP from a raw ambiguous query, enhancing the alignment between mobile-use agents and human intent. Experimental results demonstrate that IFRAgent outperforms baselines by an average of 6.79\% (32.06\% relative improvement) in human intention alignment rate and improves step completion rates by an average of 5.30\% (26.34\% relative improvement). The codes are available at https://github.com/MadeAgents/Quick-on-the-Uptake.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the MobileIAR dataset containing human-intent-aligned actions and ground-truth actions to evaluate intention alignment rate for mobile-use agents. It proposes IFRAgent, which extracts explicit intention flows from demonstrations to build a query-level SOP vector library and implicit intention flows to build a user-level habit repository; these are then used via SOP extraction, retrieval-augmented generation, and query rewriting to produce personalized outputs from ambiguous queries. The central claim is that this yields average gains of 6.79% (32.06% relative) in human intention alignment rate and 5.30% (26.34% relative) in step completion rate over baselines.

Significance. If the reported gains are shown to arise from stable, generalizable user habits rather than demonstration-specific artifacts, the work would meaningfully advance personalized mobile agents by addressing the gap in implicit intent modeling. The release of the MobileIAR dataset and associated code at the cited GitHub repository are concrete strengths that support reproducibility and further research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 6.79% alignment-rate improvement and 5.30% step-completion improvement rest on the claim that implicit intention flows extracted from MobileIAR demonstrations produce a user-level habit repository that generalizes to new queries. No information is provided on the number of users, demonstrations per user, task diversity, or any cross-task or held-out-query evaluation that would distinguish stable personal preferences from session-specific patterns.
  2. [Experimental results] Experimental results (as summarized): The evaluation of intention alignment rate and step completion rate does not report error bars, statistical significance, or ablations isolating the contribution of the implicit habit repository versus the explicit SOP library, making it impossible to verify that the gains are load-bearing for the personalization claim rather than artifacts of the data-collection or retrieval setup.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The precise definitions of the SOP extractor and query rewriter, and how they interact with the habit repository during inference, are stated at a high level; a forward reference to the corresponding methods subsection would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The comments identify key areas where additional details and analyses would strengthen the presentation of our dataset and results. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 6.79% alignment-rate improvement and 5.30% step-completion improvement rest on the claim that implicit intention flows extracted from MobileIAR demonstrations produce a user-level habit repository that generalizes to new queries. No information is provided on the number of users, demonstrations per user, task diversity, or any cross-task or held-out-query evaluation that would distinguish stable personal preferences from session-specific patterns.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not include these dataset and evaluation details due to length constraints. The full manuscript describes the MobileIAR collection process and evaluation protocol in the experimental section, including user counts, demonstrations, and held-out query splits to assess habit generalization. To directly address the concern, we will revise the abstract to summarize the number of users, demonstrations per user, task diversity, and the held-out query evaluation used to support generalization of the user-level habit repository. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental results] Experimental results (as summarized): The evaluation of intention alignment rate and step completion rate does not report error bars, statistical significance, or ablations isolating the contribution of the implicit habit repository versus the explicit SOP library, making it impossible to verify that the gains are load-bearing for the personalization claim rather than artifacts of the data-collection or retrieval setup.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current results presentation lacks error bars, significance testing, and targeted ablations. We will add error bars and statistical significance tests to the reported metrics. We will also include new ablation experiments that isolate the contribution of the implicit habit repository (from implicit flows) versus the explicit SOP library to demonstrate that the observed gains are attributable to the personalization components rather than other factors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper collects a new MobileIAR dataset of human-intent-aligned actions and proposes IFRAgent, which separately analyzes explicit intention flows to build a query-level SOP vector library and implicit flows to build a user-level habit repository. These components feed into an SOP extractor, RAG, and query rewriter to produce personalized outputs from raw queries. The evaluation metrics (intention alignment rate and step completion rate) are defined externally to these internal constructions and measured on held-out demonstrations. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text that would reduce the reported gains to definitional equivalence or input fitting. The framework therefore rests on independent empirical measurement rather than circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central improvements rest on the assumption that human demonstrations contain extractable implicit preferences and that the new dataset accurately labels them; no free parameters or invented physical entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Human demonstrations contain stable implicit intention flows that can be automatically separated from explicit step sequences.
    Invoked when the framework builds the user-level habit repository from demonstrations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5890 in / 1223 out tokens · 32696 ms · 2026-05-18T23:59:33.583537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OS-SPEAR: A Toolkit for the Safety, Performance,Efficiency, and Robustness Analysis of OS Agents

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OS-SPEAR is a new evaluation toolkit that tests 22 OS agents and identifies trade-offs between efficiency and safety or robustness.

  2. VeriOS: Query-Driven Proactive Human-Agent-GUI Interaction for Trustworthy OS Agents

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VeriOS-Agent is an OS agent that proactively queries humans in untrustworthy scenarios via a query-driven framework and three-stage training, achieving 19.72% higher step-wise success rate over baselines while preserv...

  3. Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    LLM agent progress depends on externalizing cognitive functions into memory, skills, protocols, and harness engineering that coordinates them reliably.