pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.12770 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chiral Altermagnetic Magnetoelectrics

Chengwu Xie , Weizhen Meng , Zhenzhou Guo , Xiaodong Zhou , Shifeng Qian , Tie Yang , Wenhong Wang , Zhenxiang Cheng
show 1 more author
Xiaotian Wang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords chiral altermagnetsmagnetoelectricsmetal-organic frameworkNéel vectorspin splittingelectric polarizationK[Co(HCOO)3]
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

K[Co(HCOO)3] shows chirality-locked altermagnetic spin splitting with dual-mode switchable electric polarization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes chiral altermagnetic magnetoelectrics as a new class in structurally chiral nonpolar altermagnets. It identifies the three-dimensional metal-organic framework K[Co(HCOO)3] as a platform where spin splitting locks to the crystal's handedness. Reorienting the Néel vector produces a finite electric polarization and reverses its direction. Switching between left- and right-handed structural forms supplies a second independent reversal. Electronic and optical signals then serve as readout channels for these states, opening a route to nonvolatile spintronic devices that respond to both magnetic orientation and structural chirality.

Core claim

In this work, we introduce a new class of chiral altermagnetic magnetoelectrics in structurally chiral, nonpolar altermagnetic systems and identify the experimentally well-characterized three-dimensional metal-organic framework K[Co(HCOO)3] as a promising material platform. K[Co(HCOO)3] exhibits chirality-locked g-wave altermagnetic spin splitting together with dual-mode switchable electric polarization controlled by Néel-vector reorientation and structural chirality. Specifically, Néel-vector reorientation generates a finite electric polarization and reverses its sign, whereas chirality switching between left- and right-handed enantiomers produces an additional sign reversal. The associated

What carries the argument

Dual-mode switchable electric polarization in K[Co(HCOO)3], where Néel-vector reorientation and structural chirality each independently set the polarization sign while the g-wave altermagnetic spin splitting remains locked to chirality.

If this is right

  • Néel-vector reorientation generates a finite electric polarization whose sign reverses with the reorientation.
  • Switching between left- and right-handed enantiomers produces an additional sign reversal of the polarization.
  • Electronic and optical responses provide readout channels for the controlled states.
  • The combination supplies a route to chirality- and Néel-vector-controlled nonvolatile multifunctional spintronics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous dual control might appear in other chiral altermagnetic frameworks if the same locking of spin splitting to handedness holds.
  • The mechanism could be combined with existing spintronic architectures to add electric readout without separate electrodes.
  • Real-device tests would need to check whether surface or defect contributions alter the bulk-predicted sign reversals.

Load-bearing premise

First-principles calculations on the bulk crystal accurately capture the coupled magnetoelectric response without significant surface or defect effects that would appear in real samples.

What would settle it

Measurement in a single crystal of K[Co(HCOO)3] that shows the electric polarization reversing sign upon Néel-vector reorientation and reversing again upon switching between left- and right-handed structural forms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.12770 by Chengwu Xie, Shifeng Qian, Tie Yang, Weizhen Meng, Wenhong Wang, Xiaodong Zhou, Xiaotian Wang, Zhenxiang Cheng, Zhenzhou Guo.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) and (b) The electronic band structures along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: The 1D energy spectra of the spin-up (red) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Chirality-altermagnetism-driven sign-reversible anomalous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we introduce a new class of chiral altermagnetic magnetoelectrics in structurally chiral, nonpolar altermagnetic systems and identify the experimentally well-characterized three-dimensional metal-organic framework K[Co(HCOO)$_3$] as a promising material platform. K[Co(HCOO)$_3$] exhibits chirality-locked \emph{g}-wave altermagnetic spin splitting together with dual-mode switchable electric polarization controlled by N\'eel-vector reorientation and structural chirality. Specifically, N\'eel-vector reorientation generates a finite electric polarization and reverses its sign, whereas chirality switching between left- and right-handed enantiomers produces an additional sign reversal. The associated electronic and optical responses provide effective readout channels for these switchable states. Our results establish chiral altermagnetic magnetoelectrics as a promising route to chirality- and N\'eel-vector-controlled nonvolatile multifunctional spintronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a new class of chiral altermagnetic magnetoelectrics in structurally chiral, nonpolar altermagnetic systems and identifies the experimentally characterized three-dimensional metal-organic framework K[Co(HCOO)3] as a promising material platform. It reports chirality-locked g-wave altermagnetic spin splitting together with dual-mode switchable electric polarization, where Néel-vector reorientation generates a finite polarization and reverses its sign while structural chirality switching between left- and right-handed enantiomers produces an additional sign reversal. Associated electronic and optical responses are proposed as readout channels, positioning the platform for chirality- and Néel-vector-controlled nonvolatile multifunctional spintronics.

Significance. If the computational predictions hold, the work would be significant for establishing a concrete route to couple altermagnetic order with magnetoelectric control in a chiral nonpolar system, offering potential for multifunctional spintronic devices with nonvolatile switching and effective readout. The choice of an experimentally known MOF strengthens the proposal by providing a bridge to realizable samples.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2 and §5] The central claim that Néel-vector reorientation produces a finite, reversible electric polarization whose sign is controlled by structural chirality rests on first-principles results for the perfect bulk crystal (see §4.2 on magnetoelectric response and §5 on material identification). No supercell defect or slab calculations are referenced to bound the impact of surface termination or vacancies, which could screen the bulk polarization or decouple its sign from the Néel vector in this soft MOF; this is load-bearing for mapping the computed response to observable device behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the central effects but provides no quantitative values for the polarization magnitude, spin-splitting energy scale, or error estimates from the DFT calculations.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the g-wave altermagnetic splitting and the dual-mode polarization should be defined more explicitly when first introduced to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work's significance and for the detailed comment. We address the concern regarding the mapping of bulk first-principles results to observable behavior in the presence of surfaces and defects below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2 and §5] The central claim that Néel-vector reorientation produces a finite, reversible electric polarization whose sign is controlled by structural chirality rests on first-principles results for the perfect bulk crystal (see §4.2 on magnetoelectric response and §5 on material identification). No supercell defect or slab calculations are referenced to bound the impact of surface termination or vacancies, which could screen the bulk polarization or decouple its sign from the Néel vector in this soft MOF; this is load-bearing for mapping the computed response to observable device behavior.

    Authors: We agree that surface terminations and vacancies represent an important consideration for device applications in a soft MOF such as K[Co(HCOO)3]. Our calculations establish the intrinsic bulk magnetoelectric response arising from the symmetry-allowed coupling between the Néel vector, structural chirality, and electric polarization, as derived in §4.2. This bulk mechanism is protected by the combination of altermagnetic order and the chiral nonpolar space group. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly acknowledges possible screening by surfaces or defects and outlines mitigation approaches, including the use of high-quality single crystals, encapsulation, or thin-film geometries with controlled interfaces. While the sign reversal tied to Néel-vector reorientation and enantiomer switching remains a symmetry consequence that should persist away from surfaces, we recognize that quantitative bounds on screening would require additional supercell or slab calculations. Such computations are computationally demanding for the large unit cell of this MOF and lie beyond the scope of the present theoretical identification of the material platform; they are planned for follow-up studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via independent DFT computations

full rationale

The paper derives its claims about chirality-locked g-wave altermagnetic spin splitting and dual-mode switchable polarization in K[Co(HCOO)3] from first-principles DFT calculations on the bulk crystal, symmetry analysis of the nonpolar altermagnetic structure, and explicit modeling of Néel-vector reorientation and enantiomer switching. These steps produce the reported electric polarization and electronic/optical responses as outputs of the computational workflow rather than by redefinition or fitting of the inputs themselves. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or fitted-parameter renaming is load-bearing for the central results; the material platform identification rests on external experimental characterization of the MOF combined with the present calculations, which remain falsifiable against independent measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on symmetry-allowed coupling between altermagnetic order and electric polarization in chiral nonpolar crystals, plus the assumption that the chosen compound realizes g-wave splitting without additional fitting parameters beyond standard DFT.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Altermagnetic spin splitting is allowed by symmetry in the chosen crystal class when the Néel vector is oriented appropriately.
    Invoked to link magnetic reorientation to polarization sign change.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5712 in / 1161 out tokens · 37951 ms · 2026-05-18T23:08:52.125721+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Mazin and P

    I. Mazin and P. editors, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y . Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Krempask `y, L

    J. Krempask `y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ıˇrov´a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V . Stro- cov, D. Usanov,et al., Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V . N. Strocov, P. Con- stantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Cam- pos, V . K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, et al. , Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Y . Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y . Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y . Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y . Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Nat. Phys. 21, 760 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y .-J. Sun, Y . Huang, X. Zheng, Y . Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, Nat. Phys. 21, 754– (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, L

    R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, L. ˇSmejkal, K. V `yborn`y, Y . Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn`y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    H. Bai, Y . C. Zhang, Y . J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y . C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y . Feng, Y . J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y . Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    T. He, L. Li, C. Cui, R.-W. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G. Liu, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 146602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, et al., Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Gonzalez Betancourt, J

    R. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub ´aˇc, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´aˇn, G. Springholz, K. Olejn ´ık, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 036702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Takagi, R

    R. Takagi, R. Hirakida, Y . Settai, R. Oiwa, H. Takagi, A. Ki- taori, K. Yamauchi, H. Inoue, J.-i. Yamaura, D. Nishio- Hamane, et al., Nat. Mater. 24, 63 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Badura, W

    A. Badura, W. H. Campos, V . K. Bharadwaj, I. Kounta, L. Michez, M. Petit, J. Rial, M. Leivisk ¨a, V . Baltz, F. Krizek, et al., Nat. Commun. 16, 7111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    L. Han, X. Fu, W. He, Y . Zhu, J. Dai, W. Yang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, C. Chen, C. Wan, et al. , arXiv:2403.13427 (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2403.13427

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.13427 2024

  27. [27]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, X. Yang, G.-Y . Guo, and Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Le ˇzai´c, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ugel, and Y . Mokrousov, J. Appl. Phys.127, 213904 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz ´alez- Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    I. Gray, Q. Deng, Q. Tian, M. Chilcote, J. S. Dodge, M. Brahlek, and L. Wu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125 (2024), 10.1063/5.0244878

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0244878 2024

  31. [31]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, W. Wang, Y . Liu, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Adv. Mater. , 2502575 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    W. Chen, X. Zhou, W.-K. Lou, and K. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 111, 064428 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Xinfeng, D

    C. Xinfeng, D. Ning, P. Barone, C. Rizza, S. Dong, W. Ren, P. G. Radaelli, G. Gou, and A. Stroppa, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06638 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06638

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.06638 2025

  34. [34]

    Hariki, A

    A. Hariki, A. Dal Din, O. Amin, T. Yamaguchi, A. Badura, D. Kriegner, K. Edmonds, R. Campion, P. Wadley, D. Backes, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Weber, S

    M. Weber, S. Wust, L. Haag, A. Akashdeep, K. Leck- ron, C. Schmitt, R. Ramos, T. Kikkawa, E. Saitoh, M. Kl ¨aui, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05187 (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05187

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.05187 2024

  36. [36]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasi- lyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, N. Wind, et al., Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4883 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    F. Liu, Z. Zhang, X. Yuan, Y . Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Lu, and R. Xiong, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134437 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Noh, G.-H

    S. Noh, G.-H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Jung, U. Seo, G. So, J. Lee, S. Lee, M. Park, S. Yang, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, R. Hu, S. Yan, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Nano Lett. 24, 11179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, S. Huang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and Z. Cheng, Adv. Sci. , e03235 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y . Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´c, and T. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Y . Zhu, M. Gu, Y . Liu, X. Chen, Y . Li, S. Du, and Q. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 056801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. Zutic, and T. Zhou, Nano Letters , 25 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Z. Guo, X. Wang, W. Wang, G. Zhang, X. Zhou, and Z. Cheng, Adv. Mater. (2025), 10.1002/adma.202505779

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202505779 2025

  47. [47]

    Cheong and F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 13 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Nat. Rev. Mater. , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Nespolo, M

    M. Nespolo, M. I. Aroyo, and B. Souvignier, J. Appl. Crystal- logr. 51, 1481 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Zhang, Y

    Y . Zhang, Y . Sun, H. Yang, J.ˇZelezn`y, S. P. Parkin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. B95, 075128 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    N. J. Ghimire, A. Botana, J. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y .-S. Chen, and J. Mitchell, Nat. Commun. 9, 3280 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Fujishiro, N

    Y . Fujishiro, N. Kanazawa, R. Kurihara, H. Ishizuka, T. Hori, F. S. Yasin, X. Yu, A. Tsukazaki, M. Ichikawa, M. Kawasaki, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 317 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, Y . Li, and Y . Yao, Nano Lett. 23, 5680 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Konishi, M

    K. Konishi, M. Nomura, N. Kumagai, S. Iwamoto, Y . Arakawa, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 057402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Jiang and N

    S. Jiang and N. A. Kotov, Adv. Mater. 35, 2108431 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Crassous, M

    J. Crassous, M. J. Fuchter, D. E. Freedman, N. A. Kotov, J. Moon, M. C. Beard, and S. Feldmann, Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 365 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    S. W. Im, H.-Y . Ahn, R. M. Kim, N. H. Cho, H. Kim, Y .-C. Lim, H.-E. Lee, and K. T. Nam, Adv. Mater. 32, 1905758 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Q. Yang, G. Li, K. Manna, F. Fan, C. Felser, and Y . Sun, Adv. Mater. 32, 1908518 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    X. Wang, Q. Yang, S. Singh, H. Borrmann, V . Hasse, C. Yi, Y . Li, M. Schmidt, X. Li, G. H. Fecher, et al., Nat. Energy 10, 101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Chang, B

    G. Chang, B. J. Wieder, F. Schindler, D. S. Sanchez, I. Belopol- ski, S.-M. Huang, B. Singh, D. Wu, T.-R. Chang, T. Neupert, et al., Nat. Mater. 17, 978 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    D. S. Sanchez, I. Belopolski, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, G. Chang, W. Xie, K. Manna, V . S¨uß, C.-Y . Huang,et al., Na- ture 567, 500 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    N. B. Schr ¨oter, D. Pei, M. G. Vergniory, Y . Sun, K. Manna, F. De Juan, J. A. Krieger, V . S¨uss, M. Schmidt, P. Dudin, et al., Nat. Phys. 15, 759 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    M. Z. Hasan, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, G. Bian, S.-Y . Xu, and J.-X. Yin, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 784 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y . Xu, B. J. Wieder, D. S. Sanchez, S.-M. Huang, I. Belopolski, T.-R. Chang, S. Zhang, A. Bansil, H. Lin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Takane, Z

    D. Takane, Z. Wang, S. Souma, K. Nakayama, T. Nakamura, H. Oinuma, Y . Nakata, H. Iwasawa, C. Cacho, T. Kim, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    D. Wang, C. Cui, X.-P. Li, and R.-W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B107, 195125 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Z. Duan, Z. Wang, and S. Gao, Dalton Trans. 40, 4465 (2011)

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    Anzenhofer, J

    K. Anzenhofer, J. Van Den Berg, P. Cossee, and J. Helle, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 31, 1057 (1970)

    work page 1970

  70. [70]

    Parkin and R

    S. Parkin and R. Friend, Philosophical Magazine B 41, 65 (1980)

    work page 1980

  71. [71]

    Parkin, E

    S. Parkin, E. Marseglia, and P. Brown, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 16, 2765 (1983)

    work page 1983

  72. [72]

    Takagi, R

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y . Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. Khanh, K. Karube, et al., Nat. Phys. 19, 961 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Chen, Y . Yu, and Q. Liu, Nature Communica- tions 16, 4882 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Structural chemistry data, software, and insights,

    Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, “Structural chemistry data, software, and insights,” (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Chen, X.-T

    C. Chen, X.-T. Zeng, Z. Chen, Y . Zhao, X.-L. Sheng, and S. A. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 026405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    X. Wang, J. Bai, J. Wang, Z. Cheng, S. Qian, W. Wang, G. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y . Yao, Adv. Mater. 36, 2407437 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Wang, T.-T

    J. Wang, T.-T. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Cheng, W. Wang, S. Qian, Z. Cheng, G. Zhang, and X. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2316079 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    J. Cao, W. Jiang, X.-P. Li, D. Tu, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    van Engen, K

    P. van Engen, K. Buschow, and M. Erman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 30, 374 (1983)

    work page 1983

  80. [80]

    T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koretsune, O. M. J. van’t Erve, Y . P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y . Li, M.-T. Suzuki, S. Patankar, M. Ikhlas, C. L. Chien, R. Arita, R. D. Shull, J. Orenstein, and S. Nakatsuji, Nat. Photonics 12, 73 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.