pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.16112 · v2 · pith:PGTCTW6Vnew · submitted 2025-08-22 · 💻 cs.AI

IR-Agent: Expert-Inspired LLM Agents for Structure Elucidation from Infrared Spectra

Heewoong Noh , Namkyeong Lee , Gyoung S. Na , Kibum Kim , Chanyoung Park This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 23:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords infrared spectroscopystructure elucidationmulti-agent systemslarge language modelschemical analysisspectral interpretationAI for chemistry
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-agent framework of language models emulates expert infrared analysis to identify molecular structures from spectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

IR spectroscopy is a low-cost, widely available lab tool that yields key clues about unknown molecules, yet automated methods often miss the integrated reasoning chemists use and struggle to fold in extra chemical data. The paper presents IR-Agent as a collection of specialized LLM agents, each handling one part of the expert workflow, whose collaboration produces more accurate structure guesses. Experiments show gains over standard baselines on real spectra plus the ability to incorporate varied chemical inputs. If the approach holds, routine structure work could shift toward systems that mirror how analysts actually combine evidence rather than treating spectra in isolation.

Core claim

IR-Agent is a novel multi-agent framework for molecular structure elucidation from IR spectra. The framework emulates expert-driven IR analysis procedures and is inherently extensible. Each agent specializes in a specific aspect of IR interpretation, and their complementary roles enable integrated reasoning that improves overall accuracy.

What carries the argument

IR-Agent, the multi-agent LLM system in which separate agents each handle one facet of expert IR interpretation and pool their outputs for a final structure proposal.

If this is right

  • The system raises accuracy on real-world experimental IR spectra above existing single-model baselines.
  • It accepts and uses additional chemical information beyond the spectrum itself.
  • New agent roles can be added without redesigning the whole framework.
  • The same division of labor can be applied to other spectral techniques once the expert-emulation pattern is validated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Chemistry labs with limited expert time could route routine IR samples through the agent system first and reserve human review for ambiguous cases.
  • Combining the agents with other spectroscopic data streams such as NMR would require only new specialized agents rather than a full rewrite.
  • If prompting inconsistencies prove hard to eliminate, performance ceilings may appear that single large models avoid.

Load-bearing premise

Specialized language-model agents can reliably copy expert analytical steps and merge different kinds of chemical knowledge without adding consistent errors from model quirks or prompt mismatches.

What would settle it

Running IR-Agent and a single-model baseline on a large held-out set of experimental IR spectra and finding no statistically significant accuracy gain for structure prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16112 by Chanyoung Park, Gyoung S. Na, Heewoong Noh, Kibum Kim, Namkyeong Lee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of IR-Agent. (a) Overall framework. Given an unknown IR spectrum, IR￾Agent first utilizes the IR Spectra Translator to generate candidate structures in SMILES format. The Table Interpretation (TI) Expert then extracts local structural information by referencing the IR absorption table through the IR Peak Table Assigner. In parallel, the Retriever (Ret) Expert obtains global structural features fro… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Outputs of expert agents in IR-Agent during the structure elucidation process. Top-K Accuracy (a) Number of Translator Output (C) (b) Transferred IR Translator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In-depth Analysis results. which raises the risk of incorporating irrelevant or misleading structural features. These results suggest that selecting an appropriate number of SMILES can￾didates is crucial for effective expert reasoning. Performance of IR-Agent using the Transferred IR Spectra Translator. As our framework is com￾patible with various IR spectra translators for gen￾erating initial SMILES candi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance of IR-Agent using Translator across different beam widths on these integrative analyses, the SE Expert accurately infers the complete molecular structure of the target spectrum. Ret Expert TI Expert SE Expert ✓ Most of the candidate SMILES show an aromatic ring decorated with electronegative substituents (primarily Cl, sometimes F or Br) and additional functional groups like –S (thiol/ thioethe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Additional Case Study: Outputs of expert agents in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spectral analysis provides crucial clues for the elucidation of unknown materials. Among various techniques, infrared spectroscopy (IR) plays an important role in laboratory settings due to its high accessibility and low cost. However, existing approaches often fail to reflect expert analytical processes and lack flexibility in incorporating diverse types of chemical knowledge, which is essential in real-world analytical scenarios. In this paper, we propose IR-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework for molecular structure elucidation from IR spectra. The framework is designed to emulate expert-driven IR analysis procedures and is inherently extensible. Each agent specializes in a specific aspect of IR interpretation, and their complementary roles enable integrated reasoning, thereby improving the overall accuracy of structure elucidation. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that IR-Agent not only improves baseline performance on experimental IR spectra but also shows strong adaptability to various forms of chemical information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes IR-Agent, a multi-agent LLM framework for molecular structure elucidation from IR spectra. It emulates expert analytical procedures by assigning specialized roles to agents for different aspects of IR interpretation, enabling integrated reasoning and incorporation of diverse chemical knowledge. The central claim is that this setup improves accuracy on experimental IR spectra over baselines while demonstrating strong adaptability to various forms of chemical information.

Significance. If validated, the work could contribute to AI-assisted analytical chemistry by offering an extensible, expert-inspired alternative to rigid existing methods for spectral interpretation. The multi-agent design directly targets flexibility and process emulation, which are noted limitations in prior approaches. Strengths include the focus on real-world adaptability, though this hinges on empirical evidence of reliable emulation without LLM artifacts.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental section / results] The central claim that the multi-agent framework reliably emulates expert IR interpretation and integrates chemical knowledge without systematic errors from model limitations or prompting inconsistencies is load-bearing but lacks direct validation. No side-by-side evaluation against human spectroscopists (accuracy plus qualitative peak-to-structure mapping) is described, leaving open the possibility that reported gains stem from prompt engineering or dataset characteristics rather than faithful emulation of analytical processes.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract asserts performance gains and adaptability on experimental IR spectra but provides no details on baselines, dataset sizes, error metrics, or controls. This undermines assessment of whether improvements are substantive, as the soundness of the empirical validation cannot be fully evaluated from the available description.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one quantitative result (e.g., accuracy delta or dataset scale) to ground the performance claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to strengthen the presentation of our results and the description of the experimental validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental section / results] The central claim that the multi-agent framework reliably emulates expert IR interpretation and integrates chemical knowledge without systematic errors from model limitations or prompting inconsistencies is load-bearing but lacks direct validation. No side-by-side evaluation against human spectroscopists (accuracy plus qualitative peak-to-structure mapping) is described, leaving open the possibility that reported gains stem from prompt engineering or dataset characteristics rather than faithful emulation of analytical processes.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the importance of validating the emulation aspect. The agent roles in IR-Agent are explicitly derived from standard expert IR analysis workflows (e.g., peak identification, functional group assignment, and knowledge-augmented structure proposal). Experiments on experimental spectra show consistent gains over single-agent and non-specialized baselines, with ablations confirming the value of role specialization. We have added qualitative examples of agent reasoning traces in the revised results section to demonstrate alignment with expert-like step-by-step interpretation. We also included multiple-run consistency checks to mitigate prompting variability. A full side-by-side human study would require recruiting expert spectroscopists and is outside the scope of the current work but is noted as valuable future validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract asserts performance gains and adaptability on experimental IR spectra but provides no details on baselines, dataset sizes, error metrics, or controls. This undermines assessment of whether improvements are substantive, as the soundness of the empirical validation cannot be fully evaluated from the available description.

    Authors: We agree that greater specificity in the abstract will help readers evaluate the claims. The revised abstract now includes the main baselines (single LLM prompting and non-specialized multi-agent variants), the size of the experimental IR dataset, the primary metrics (top-1 and top-5 accuracy), and a brief mention of the controls used to test adaptability to different chemical knowledge inputs. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct quantitative and qualitative side-by-side comparison against human spectroscopists was not performed and cannot be added without new experiments involving expert participants.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical framework evaluation with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper proposes a multi-agent LLM framework for IR spectral analysis and evaluates it through experiments on experimental spectra, claiming improved performance and adaptability. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical predictions appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claims rest on empirical results rather than any reduction to prior inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. This is a standard empirical proposal paper whose evaluation is independent of any internal definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the untested premise that LLMs possess sufficient embedded chemical knowledge to act as reliable expert proxies when organized into agents; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Large language models contain enough chemical domain knowledge to emulate expert IR spectral interpretation when structured as specialized agents.
    Framework success hinges on this capability being present and stable across prompts and spectra.
invented entities (1)
  • IR-Agent multi-agent framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To integrate complementary reasoning steps for structure elucidation from IR spectra
    New system architecture proposed by the authors with no independent existence prior to this work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1135 out tokens · 33555 ms · 2026-05-21T23:12:42.534658+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Alberts, M., Laino, T., and Vaucher, A. C. Leveraging infrared spectroscopy for automated structure elucidation. Communications Chemistry, 7(1):268, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Unraveling molecular structure: A multimodal spectroscopic dataset for chemistry

    Alberts, M., Schilter, O., Zipoli, F., Hartrampf, N., and Laino, T. Unraveling molecular structure: A multimodal spectroscopic dataset for chemistry. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:125780–125808, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B., and Gomes, G

    Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B., and Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature, 624(7992):570–578, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools

    Bran, A. M., Cox, S., Schilter, O., Baldassari, C., White, A. D., and Schwaller, P. Chemcrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05376, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Comm: Collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path prompting for complex problem solving

    Chen, P., Han, B., and Zhang, S. Comm: Collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path prompting for complex problem solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17729, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Coates, J. et al. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry, 12:10815–10837, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Devata, S., Sridharan, B., Mehta, S., Pathak, Y ., Laghuvarapu, S., Varma, G., and Priyakumar, U. D. Deepspinn–deep reinforcement learning for molecular structure prediction from infrared and 13 c nmr spectra. Digital Discovery, 3(4):818–829, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Translation between Molecules and Natural Language

    Edwards, C., Lai, T., Ros, K., Honke, G., Cho, K., and Ji, H. Translation between molecules and natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11817, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Griffiths, P. R. Introduction to vibrational spectroscopy. Handbook of vibrational spectroscopy, 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Can llms solve molecule puzzles? a multimodal benchmark for molecular structure elucidation

    Guo, K., Nan, B., Zhou, Y ., Guo, T., Guo, Z., Surve, M., Liang, Z., Chawla, N., Wiest, O., and Zhang, X. Can llms solve molecule puzzles? a multimodal benchmark for molecular structure elucidation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:134721–134746, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    R., McNaught, A., Pletnev, I., Stein, S., and Tchekhovskoi, D

    Heller, S. R., McNaught, A., Pletnev, I., Stein, S., and Tchekhovskoi, D. Inchi, the iupac international chemical identifier. Journal of cheminformatics, 7:1–34, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    S., Woroch, C

    Huang, Z., Chen, M. S., Woroch, C. P., Markland, T. E., and Kanan, M. W. A framework for automated structure elucidation from routine nmr spectra. Chemical Science , 12(46): 15329–15338, 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Drugagent: Explainable drug repurposing agent with large language model-based reasoning

    Inoue, Y ., Song, T., and Fu, T. Drugagent: Explainable drug repurposing agent with large language model-based reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13378, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    G., and Cole, J

    Jung, G., Jung, S. G., and Cole, J. M. Automatic materials characterization from infrared spectra using convolutional neural networks. Chemical Science, 14(13):3600–3609, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Klein, D. R. Organic chemistry. Wiley Global Education, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Infrared and Raman spectroscopy: principles and spectral interpretation

    Larkin, P. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy: principles and spectral interpretation . Elsevier, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    S., Kim, S., Lee, J., and Park, C

    Lee, N., Hyun, D., Na, G. S., Kim, S., Lee, J., and Park, C. Conditional graph information bottleneck for molecular relational learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 18852–18871. PMLR, 2023. 10

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    S., and Park, C

    Lee, N., Noh, H., Kim, S., Hyun, D., Na, G. S., and Park, C. Density of states prediction of crystalline materials via prompt-guided multi-modal transformer. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:61678–61698, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    S., Kim, S., and Park, C

    Lee, N., Yoon, K., Na, G. S., Kim, S., and Park, C. Shift-robust molecular relational learning with causal substructure. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pp. 1200–1212, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Vision language model is not all you need: Augmentation strategies for molecule language models

    Lee, N., Laghuvarapu, S., Park, C., and Sun, J. Vision language model is not all you need: Augmentation strategies for molecule language models. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pp. 1153–1162, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Rag- enhanced collaborative llm agents for drug discovery

    Lee, N., De Brouwer, E., Hajiramezanali, E., Biancalani, T., Park, C., and Scalia, G. Rag- enhanced collaborative llm agents for drug discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17506, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Lee, T. A. A beginner’s guide to mass spectral interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, 1998

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Empowering molecule discovery for molecule-caption translation with large language models: A chatgpt perspective

    Li, J., Liu, Y ., Fan, W., Wei, X.-Y ., Liu, H., Tang, J., and Li, Q. Empowering molecule discovery for molecule-caption translation with large language models: A chatgpt perspective. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering , 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    and Kang, C

    Li, Q. and Kang, C. A practical perspective on the roles of solution nmr spectroscopy in drug discovery. Molecules, 25(13):2974, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Drugagent: Automating ai-aided drug discovery programming through llm multi-agent collaboration

    Liu, S., Lu, Y ., Chen, S., Hu, X., Zhao, J., Lu, Y ., and Zhao, Y . Drugagent: Automating ai-aided drug discovery programming through llm multi-agent collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15692, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Conversational drug editing using retrieval and domain feedback

    Liu, S., Wang, J., Yang, Y ., Wang, C., Liu, L., Guo, H., and Xiao, C. Conversational drug editing using retrieval and domain feedback. In The twelfth international conference on learning representations, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    and Lednev, I

    Mistek, E. and Lednev, I. K. Ft-ir spectroscopy for identification of biological stains for forensic purposes. 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    and Rapson, C

    Moldoveanu, S. and Rapson, C. A. Spectral interpretation for organic analysis using an expert system. Analytical Chemistry, 59(8):1207–1212, 1987

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Na, G. S. Deep learning for generating phase-conditioned infrared spectra.Analytical Chemistry, 96(49):19659–19669, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Na, G. S. and Rho, Y . C. Learning m-order spectrum graphs to identify unknown chemical compounds from infrared spectroscopy data. In 2024 9th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), pp. 134–143. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Biodiscoveryagent: An ai agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments,

    Roohani, Y ., Lee, A., Huang, Q., V ora, J., Steinhart, Z., Huang, K., Marson, A., Liang, P., and Leskovec, J. Biodiscoveryagent: An ai agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17631, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and charts

    Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and charts . John Wiley & Sons, 2004

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    Corex: Pushing the boundaries of complex reasoning through multi-model collaboration

    Sun, Q., Yin, Z., Li, X., Wu, Z., Qiu, X., and Kong, L. Corex: Pushing the boundaries of complex reasoning through multi-model collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00280, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Large and frequently occurring substructures in organic compounds obtained by library search of infrared spectra

    Varmuza, K., Penchev, P., and Scsibrany, H. Large and frequently occurring substructures in organic compounds obtained by library search of infrared spectra. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 19 (2):407–412, 1999

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017. 11

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Z., and Tan, C

    Wang, T., Tan, Y ., Chen, Y . Z., and Tan, C. Infrared spectral analysis for prediction of functional groups based on feature-aggregated deep learning. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 63(15):4615–4622, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Transformer-based models for predicting molecular structures from infrared spectra using patch-based self-attention

    Wu, W., Leonardis, A., Jiao, J., Jiang, J., and Chen, L. Transformer-based models for predicting molecular structures from infrared spectra using patch-based self-attention. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2025

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-based spectral data interpretation: a perspective

    Xue, X., Sun, H., Yang, M., Liu, X., Hu, H.-Y ., Deng, Y ., and Wang, X. Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-based spectral data interpretation: a perspective. Analytical Chemistry, 95(37):13733–13745, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Honeycomb: A flexible llm-based agent system for materials science

    Zhang, H., Song, Y ., Hou, Z., Miret, S., and Liu, B. Honeycomb: A flexible llm-based agent system for materials science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00135, 2024. 12 Supplementary Material for IR-Agent: Expert-Inspired LLM Agents for Structure Elucidation from Infrared Spectra A Implementation Details 14 A.1 IR Spectra Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Fc1ccc(Br)c(Cl)c1,

    Fc1ccc(Cl)c(Br)c1, 2. Fc1ccc(Br)c(Cl)c1, ... , 7. SCc1ccc(Cl)c(F)c1, 8. Fc1cc(OC)c(Cl)c1, 9. Fc1ccc(Cl)c(Cl)c1, 10. Fc1c(Cl)cc(Br)c1 Figure 5: Additional Case Study: Outputs of expert agents in IR-Agent. C Limitations & Future Work We focus on extracting local structural information based on interpretations from the IR absorption table. However, accurate ...

    work page

  41. [43]

    Guided by the structural insights from steps 1 and 2, produce a refined Top-N list of SMILES candidates

    work page

  42. [45]

    SMILES_2, 3

    SMILES_1, 2. SMILES_2, 3. SMILES_3, ..., N. SMILES_N 23 Table 11: Prompt for Structure Elucidation (SE) Expert with Chemical Information (Section 4.4) System Prompt: You are an expert organic chemist with specialized knowledge in analyzing infrared (IR) spectra. Prompt: Your task is to refine the given SMILES list and generate a N candidate list that alig...

    work page

  43. [46]

    Identify the substructures that are common to both the IR table interpretation and at least one SMILES in the list

    work page

  44. [47]

    From the retriever agent output, extract structural information (e.g., recurring motifs / scaffolds) suggested by high-similarity candidates

    work page

  45. [48]

    Guided by the structural insights from steps 1,2, and[{Atom Types}, {Scaffold}, {Carbon Count}] constraint, produce a refined Top-N list of SMILES candidates

    work page

  46. [49]

    Based on these analyses, regenerate a list of Top-N SMILES by refining the target smiles: {SMILES Candidates}

    Ensure the final list is chemically diverse and plausible—do not overfit to any single interpretation. Based on these analyses, regenerate a list of Top-N SMILES by refining the target smiles: {SMILES Candidates}. Let’s think step-by-step. ONLY THE REQUESTED CONTENT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR ANSWER FORMAT MUST BE AS FOLLOWS ONLY CONTAINING...

    work page

  47. [50]

    SMILES_2, 3

    SMILES_1, 2. SMILES_2, 3. SMILES_3, ..., N. SMILES_N 24

    work page