A non-invasive dry-transfer method for fabricating mesoscopic devices on sensitive materials

Bingbing Tong; Duolin Wang; Fanming Qu; Guangtong Liu; Jianfei Xiao; Jiangping Hu; Jie Shen; Jiezhong He; Li Lu; Peiling Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 8 references

A non-invasive dry-transfer method for fabricating mesoscopic devices on sensitive materials

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A non-invasive dry-transfer method fabricates mesoscopic devices on materials that cannot tolerate air, solvents, or heat, preserving their intrinsic properties.

desk verdict Useful all-dry glovebox fabrication workflow for air/solvent/heat-sensitive materials, but the 'fully preserves intrinsic properties' claim needs more evidence, especially around the tape-peel step. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19550 v1 pith:5CFUBU44 submitted 2025-08-27 cond-mat.mes-hall

Zhongmou Jia , Yiwen Ma , Zhongchen Xu , Xue Yang , Jianfei Xiao , Jiezhong He , Yunteng Shi , Zhiyuan Zhang

show 13 more authors

Duolin Wang Sicheng Zhou Bingbing Tong Peiling Li Ziwei Dou Xiaohui Song Guangtong Liu Jie Shen Zhaozheng Lyu Youguo Shi Jiangping Hu Li Lu Fanming Qu

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 85.40.-e73.63.-b

keywords drytransfersensitivematerialsmesoscopicdevicesPMMAmaskvanderWaalscontactsK2Cr3As3WTe2encapsulation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a universal dry-transfer fabrication process for building submicron electrical contacts and encapsulation layers on materials that degrade when exposed to air, solvents, or heat. The method uses free-standing PMMA masks patterned by electron-beam lithography, transferred with a PDMS stamp, then coated with metal and peeled off with tape, all inside a glovebox. The authors demonstrate the technique on K2Cr3As3, a highly air-sensitive one-dimensional superconductor, and WTe2, a two-dimensional Weyl semimetal, showing that the devices retain their bulk-like transport signatures. They claim the method fully preserves the intrinsic properties of the materials and is broadly applicable to sensitive materials.

What carries the argument

The free-standing PMMA mask with a pre-defined electrode pattern is the central object. It is fabricated on a water-soluble conductive sacrificial layer, released by dissolving that layer with water, transferred to a PDMS viscoelastic stamp, and then aligned to the target material under an optical microscope. This decouples lithography—which requires solvents, developers, and baking—from the sensitive material, allowing all exposure steps to occur away from it. The subsequent tape-peel removal of the metal film and mask forms the electrode pattern, and encapsulation layers are fabricated by repeating the same procedure.

What would settle it

Perform atomic force microscopy and Raman spectroscopy directly on the exfoliated K2Cr3As3 or WTe2 surface immediately after the tape-peel step, looking for tears, roughness increases, or foreign material not present on a pristine, glovebox-prepared reference surface. A finding of PMMA residue or substrate damage confined to the peeled area would falsify the claim of non-invasiveness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that mesoscopic devices can be fabricated on sensitive materials without any exposure to air, solvents, or heating, by separating the lithographic patterning step from the material itself. A PMMA mask with a pre-defined electrode pattern is first prepared on a sacrificial water-soluble layer, released onto a PDMS stamp, and then aligned and placed onto the target material inside a glovebox. After metal deposition, the mask and excess metal are peeled off with tape, and an Al2O3 encapsulation layer is added using the same process. The resulting K2Cr3As3 devices show linear temperature-dependent resistivity, superconductivity at Tc ~ 5 K, and retention of superconductivity

Load-bearing premise

The tape-peel step removes the metal film and PMMA mask from the surface of the sensitive material without tearing it, leaving residue, or otherwise damaging its intrinsic properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Materials that were previously inaccessible for electrical transport measurements, such as air-sensitive exfoliated crystals, can now be built into four- or six-terminal devices and measured at low temperatures.
The method works on both one-dimensional and two-dimensional materials with no thickness limitation, extending beyond the few-layer regime typical of van der Waals transfer techniques.
Sub-micron electrode accuracy is achievable, enabling mesoscopic device geometries such as Hall bars on sensitive materials.
Integrated encapsulation with Al2O3 protects the finished device, allowing further electrode extension and wire bonding using standard micro-fabrication steps within a glovebox.
The all-dry, no-heat, no-solvent workflow is compatible with materials that are also heat-sensitive, broadening the applicability beyond air-sensitive compounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be extended to other reactive compounds, including air-sensitive iron-based superconductors, topological semimetals, or magnetic materials, as long as their mechanical fragility tolerates the tape-peel step.
Because the mask preparation is separate, one can pre-characterize the mask quality and electrode geometry before ever contacting the sensitive material, potentially enabling batch fabrication of many devices on one crystal.
A direct comparison of the tape-peel step on freshly cleaved surfaces of the target materials—using atomic force microscopy or scanning tunneling microscopy—would test whether metal and PMMA residues are truly absent at the atomic scale, beyond the reported h-BN control.
The technique may combine with in-situ measurements in the same glovebox-connected vacuum system, allowing transport studies of materials that degrade even during a short air transfer between fabrication and measurement.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The real contribution here is a fabrication workflow, not a physics result: free-standing PMMA masks are released with a water-soluble sacrificial layer, stamped onto the material in a glovebox via PDMS, coated with metal, and then the mask/metal is peeled off with tape. Everything happens without solvent, heat, or air exposure, and it works on both a 1D superconductor (K2Cr3As3) and a 2D semimetal (WTe2). The transport data are consistent with bulk behavior—linear resistivity with a 5 K Tc for the former, a few-ohm contact resistance and negative longitudinal magnetoresistance for the latter. That is genuinely useful; I can see this becoming a go-to method for mesoscopic devices on reactive exfoliated materials.

The soft spots are mostly about how strongly the claims are worded. The paper says the technique 'fully preserves intrinsic properties' and is 'universal' on the basis of two materials, no control devices, no yield statistics, and no error bars. The tape-peel step is the least validated load-bearing step. The paper itself warns that if the peel fails, residue may remain, and the only surface characterization (AFM) is on h-BN and SiO2, not on K2Cr3As3 or WTe2. The supplementary also recommends a different peel procedure for 10-nm WTe2, which suggests the step is not material-independent. These are internal evidence gaps, not unreasonable interpretations. I don't think the method is wrong—the electrical data look plausible—but the non-invasiveness claim of the tape peel should be checked directly, e.g., AFM or XPS on the actual material after peeling, and the authors should report how many devices worked and how often residue appeared.

One smaller but real issue: the WTe2 text has a contradictory angle definition in Fig. 3, with the same angle given as 90° for two perpendicular field orientations. That needs fixing.

Overall, a solid methods paper with an honest limitation note; it deserves a serious referee, but the referee should ask for the controls and yield data before publication. I'd read it for the workflow and cite it as a method option, though I wouldn't rely on the 'fully preserves' claim until the tape-peel is shown to leave clean interfaces on fragile materials.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports an all-dry, glovebox-based fabrication route for making mesoscopic electrical devices on air-, solvent-, and heat-sensitive materials. Free-standing PMMA masks, pre-patterned by electron-beam lithography and released from a water-soluble sacrificial layer, are transferred by a PDMS stamp onto the target material inside a glovebox. Metal electrodes are deposited through the mask, the mask/metal stack is removed with tape, and the device is encapsulated with Al2O3 using the same mask-transfer procedure. The method is demonstrated on K2Cr3As3 (a quasi-1D superconductor) and WTe2 (a 2D type-II Weyl semimetal candidate). The K2Cr3As3 devices show a linear R(T) from 5 to 300 K, Tc ≈ 5 K, and superconductivity surviving a 12 T vertical field; the WTe2 Hall bar shows a small contact resistance, non-saturating magnetoresistance, and a negative longitudinal magnetoresistance. The authors conclude that the technique preserves the integrity of the materials, provides high-quality contacts, and is broadly applicable.

Significance. If the central claim is fully established, the method is a useful practical advance: it solves a real problem in mesoscopic transport on sensitive materials by avoiding air, solvents, and heating during device fabrication. The strengths are that the process is described in enough detail to reproduce, it is demonstrated on two chemically different materials, and the measured transport signatures are broadly consistent with published bulk behavior. The paper does not rely on fits or models, so there is no circularity issue. However, the paper's headline assertion—that the method 'fully preserves intrinsic properties'—is stronger than the evidence presented: the only direct surface characterization is AFM on h-BN and SiO2, not on the target materials, and no control devices or quantitative benchmarks are provided. The reported electrical data are consistent with the method being non-damaging, but they are not a sensitive test of surface residue, tearing, or strain from the tape-peel step. The method is therefore promising, but the central non-invasiveness claim needs additional support before publication.

major comments (3)

[Fig. 1(i) and the 'To ensure successful fabrication' paragraph in the main text] The tape-peel step is load-bearing for the non-invasiveness claim: it is the only point at which a mechanical force is applied to the entire device stack after metal deposition. Yet the paper provides no direct evidence that this step is benign on the target materials. The only AFM data (Fig. S1) are taken on h-BN and on the Si/SiO2 substrate, not on K2Cr3As3 or WTe2. The manuscript itself warns that 'otherwise, residue may remain on the material surface' if the peel is not single and successful. Since the conclusion that the method 'fully preserves intrinsic properties' rests on this step, please provide direct characterization (e.g., AFM/Raman/XPS on the actual materials, or a device processed through all steps except metal deposition as a control) or explicitly soften the claim to 'no degradation detected in the transport measurements.'
[Fig. 2(d)-(g) and the K2Cr3As3 section] The evidence that K2Cr3As3 is undamaged is purely consistency with published bulk measurements: a linear R(T), Tc ≈ 5 K, and survival of superconductivity in a 12 T field. These are robust bulk signatures, but they are not sensitive to small amounts of surface residue, strain, or contact-induced doping. No control device, no absolute resistivity or residual-resistivity-ratio comparison, and no contact-resistance estimate are reported for K2Cr3As3. In addition, the field orientation relative to the 1D chains for the 12 T data is not stated. To support the 'fully preserves intrinsic properties' conclusion, the authors should add quantitative consistency checks (e.g., RRR, absolute resistivity range, Hc2(T) orientation) or reduce the strength of the claim to what the data actually show.
[Fig. 3 and the WTe2 section] The angular notation in the WTe2 section is internally inconsistent: the text states that for B//c, θ = 90°, and then says that for B⊥c, B//I, θ = 90° as well. The inset of Fig. 3(b) and the caption need to be reconciled and the definition stated unambiguously. Also, the negative longitudinal magnetoresistance is interpreted as 'a signature of the topological properties.' This is a strong interpretation: negative longitudinal MR can also arise from current jetting, inhomogeneous current paths, or misalignment of field and current. Since the device is a Hall bar, a control measurement with reversed field or a discussion of possible spurious contributions would make the topological assignment more convincing.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Conclusion] The paper says the method 'completely avoids exposure to water, oxygen, and the solvents,' but DI water is used in Fig. 1(c)-(e) to release the PMMA masks from the sacrificial layer. It is likely that the water never contacts the target material, but this should be stated explicitly to avoid an apparent contradiction.
[Fig. S1 and Fig. S2] Minor typographical and clarity issues: 'Mask-substrate area' and 'ecommend' in Fig. S2 should be corrected; the AFM height-profile labels should be explained in the caption. Also, the text mentions 'higher-viscosity PDMS-assistdance'—typo.
[Fig. 2 and Fig. 3] Scale bars are given for the K2Cr3As3 images in Fig. 2 but not for the WTe2 image in Fig. 3(a). The reader cannot judge the device size or the electrode geometry.
[Electrode-extension section] The sentence 'Noteworthy, to eliminate heating, the photoresist is cured in vacuum instead of baking in electrode extension steps' is unclear. Vacuum curing of photoresist is not standard and the mechanism is not described; please specify the resist chemistry and cure conditions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: fabrication method is validated against external bulk measurements; the one overlapping-author citation is background context, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental fabrication-methods report with no equations, no fitted parameters, and no derived prediction that could reduce to its inputs. The central claim—that the dry-transfer process preserves the intrinsic properties of K2Cr3As3 and WTe2—is benchmarked against independent published bulk measurements: the linear resistivity and Tc~5 K are compared to bulk reports (refs [24-26], [20]), the 12 T superconductivity to refs [25,26], and the WTe2 magnetoresistance signatures to refs [29,31]. These are external benchmarks, not quantities defined by the method itself. The only self-citation with overlapping authors is ref [23] (arXiv:2408.07342), cited for 'possible p-wave pairing' and for noting that K2Cr3As3 has previously seen limited microscopic electrical measurements; that is background context and does not define or force the success criteria of the present fabrication claim. The paper does contain an internal evidence gap: the tape-peel step is identified as failure-prone ('Otherwise, residue may remain on the material surface') and the SI recommends different handling for 10-nm WTe2 (Fig. S2), but this is a validation gap, not a circularity. No step in the manuscript equates an output with an input by definition, nor does any fitted parameter get renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central claim rests on process parameters (PMMA thickness, mask size, sacrificial layer thickness) and on domain assumptions about the safety and reliability of the transfer, tape peel, and encapsulation steps, plus the representativeness of the two demonstration materials.

free parameters (3)

PMMA mask thickness
Process parameter chosen by hand to make mask handling and transfer reliable; no quantitative table is given, so the recipe requires iteration.
Mask size for electrode extension = 600 μm
Recommended in the text ('A 600-μm mask is recommended') for electrodes, indicating a hand-chosen design value.
Water-soluble sacrificial layer thickness = 40 nm
The paper specifies a 40-nm-thick water-soluble conductive coating (5090.02); a chosen parameter that affects mask release.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The water-dissoluble sacrificial layer and DI water release do not degrade or alter the PMMA mask pattern.
Invoked in Fig. 1(c)-1(e); the method depends on the mask surviving water release and droplet transfer intact.
domain assumption Peeling the metal film and mask off with tape does not damage the underlying sensitive material or leave residue.
Central to step Fig. 1(i); no direct evidence is provided for the target materials (only AFM on h-BN shows no new impurities).
domain assumption Al2O3 encapsulation, deposited via the same dry method, protects the material without degrading it.
Used in step Fig. 1(j) and in the demonstrated devices; the protective quality is inferred, not directly tested (e.g., no aging studies).
domain assumption The electrical transport signatures (linear R-T, superconductivity, negative LMR) are intrinsic properties that would be altered by material damage, so their presence proves the method is non-invasive.
The paper equates preserved bulk-consistent properties with lack of damage; this assumes the selected signatures are sensitive indicators of degradation.
domain assumption K2Cr3As3 and WTe2 are representative of the broad class of sensitive materials.
Supports the 'universal/broadly applicable' claim; this is an extrapolation from two demonstrators.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A non-invasive dry-transfer method for fabricating mesoscopic devices on sensitive materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5CFUBU44

@misc{pith2026250819550,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A non-invasive dry-transfer method for fabricating mesoscopic devices on sensitive materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5CFUBU44}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19550}
}

read the original abstract

Many materials with novel or exotic properties are highly sensitive to environmental factors such as air, solvents, and heat, which complicates device fabrication and limits their potential applications. Here, we present a universal submicron fabrication method for mesoscopic devices using a dry-transfer technique, tailored specifically for sensitive materials. This approach utilizes PMMA masks, combined with a water-dissoluble coating as a sacrificial layer, to ensure that sensitive materials are processed without exposure to harmful environmental conditions. The entire fabrication process is carried out in a glove box, employing dry techniques that avoid air, solvents, and heat exposure, culminating in an encapsulation step. We demonstrate the utility of this method by fabricating and characterizing K2Cr3As3 and WTe2 devices, a one- and two-dimensional material, respectively. The results show that our technique preserves the integrity of the materials, provides excellent contact interfaces, and is broadly applicable to a range of sensitive materials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

8 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

[1]

Meric, P.Y

1Wang, L., I. Meric, P.Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L.M. Campos, D.A. Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K.L. Shepard, and C.R. Dean, One-Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material. Science. 342(6158): 614-617. 2013 2Zomer, P.J., M.H.D. Guimarã es, J.C. Brant, N. Tombros, and B.J. van Wees, Fast pick up tec...

work page 2013
[22]

Buscema, H

2019 6Castellanos-Gomez, A., M. Buscema, H. Zant, and G. Steele, Deterministic transfer of two - dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Materials. 1: 011002. 2014 7Reina, A., X. Jia, J. Ho, D. Nezich, H. Son, V. Bulovic, M.S. Dresselhaus, and J. Kong, Few- Layer Graphene Films on Arbitrary Substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano ...

work page 2019
[699]

Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

2012 12Guo, L.J., Recent progress in nanoimprint technology and its applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 37(11): R123. 2004 13Makita, T., A. Yamamura, J. Tsurumi, S. Kumagai, T. Kurosawa, T. Okamoto, M. Sasaki, S. Watanabe, and J. Takeya, Damage-free Metal Electrode Transfer to Monolayer Organic Single Crystalline Thin Films. Sci Rep. 10(1):

work page 2012
[1635]

Zhang, J

2021 36Wu, Y., S. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Wang, Y.L. Zhu, J. Hu, G. Yin, K. Wong, C. Fang, C. Wan, X. Han, Q. Shao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Zang, Z. Mao, X. Zhang, and K.L. Wang, Né el- type skyrmion in WTe 2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure. Nature Communications. 18 11(1):

work page 2021
[1801]

Xiong, S

2023 33Ali, M.N., J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q.D. Gibson, L.M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N.P. Ong, and R.J. Cava, Large, non -saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2. Nature. 514(7521): 205-208. 2014 34Cai, P.L., J. Hu, L.P. He, J. Pan, X.C. Hong, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Wei, Z.Q. Mao, and S.Y. Li, Drastic Pressure Effect on th...

work page 2023
[2150]

2017 31Wang, Y., E. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Pan, L. Zhang, J. Zeng, Y. Fu, M. Wang, K. Xu, Z. Huang, Z. Wang, H.-Z. Lu, D. Xing, B. Wang, X. Wan, and F. Miao, Gate-tunable negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in the predicted type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nature Communications. 7(1): 13142. 2016 32Lee, J., J. Kwon, E. Lee, J. Park, S. Cha, K. Watanabe, T. Tanig...

work page 2017
[3860]

2020 37Wang, F., G. Shi, K. -W. Kim, H.-J. Park, J.G. Jang, H.R. Tan, M. Lin, Y. Liu, T. Kim, D. Yang, S. Zhao, K. Lee, S. Yang, A. Soumyanarayanan, K. -J. Lee, and H. Yang, Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by two -dimensional PtTe 2/WTe2 van der Waals heterostructures with high spin Hall conductivity. Nature Materials. 23(6): 768-774. ...

work page 2020
[4702]

Imai, F.L

2020 14Zhi, H.Z., T. Imai, F.L. Ning, J.-K. Bao, and G.-H. Cao, NMR Investigation of the Quasi-One- Dimensional Superconductor K2Cr3As3. Physical Review Letters. 114(14): 147004. 2015 15Zhang, W.L., H. Li, D. Xia, H.W. Liu, Y.G. Shi, J.L. Luo, J. Hu, P. Richard, and H. Ding, Observation of a Raman -active phonon with Fano line shape in the quasi -one-dime...

arXiv 2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Meric, P.Y

1Wang, L., I. Meric, P.Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L.M. Campos, D.A. Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K.L. Shepard, and C.R. Dean, One-Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material. Science. 342(6158): 614-617. 2013 2Zomer, P.J., M.H.D. Guimarã es, J.C. Brant, N. Tombros, and B.J. van Wees, Fast pick up tec...

work page 2013

[2] [22]

Buscema, H

2019 6Castellanos-Gomez, A., M. Buscema, H. Zant, and G. Steele, Deterministic transfer of two - dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Materials. 1: 011002. 2014 7Reina, A., X. Jia, J. Ho, D. Nezich, H. Son, V. Bulovic, M.S. Dresselhaus, and J. Kong, Few- Layer Graphene Films on Arbitrary Substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano ...

work page 2019

[3] [699]

Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

2012 12Guo, L.J., Recent progress in nanoimprint technology and its applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 37(11): R123. 2004 13Makita, T., A. Yamamura, J. Tsurumi, S. Kumagai, T. Kurosawa, T. Okamoto, M. Sasaki, S. Watanabe, and J. Takeya, Damage-free Metal Electrode Transfer to Monolayer Organic Single Crystalline Thin Films. Sci Rep. 10(1):

work page 2012

[4] [1635]

Zhang, J

2021 36Wu, Y., S. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Wang, Y.L. Zhu, J. Hu, G. Yin, K. Wong, C. Fang, C. Wan, X. Han, Q. Shao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Zang, Z. Mao, X. Zhang, and K.L. Wang, Né el- type skyrmion in WTe 2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure. Nature Communications. 18 11(1):

work page 2021

[5] [1801]

Xiong, S

2023 33Ali, M.N., J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q.D. Gibson, L.M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N.P. Ong, and R.J. Cava, Large, non -saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2. Nature. 514(7521): 205-208. 2014 34Cai, P.L., J. Hu, L.P. He, J. Pan, X.C. Hong, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Wei, Z.Q. Mao, and S.Y. Li, Drastic Pressure Effect on th...

work page 2023

[6] [2150]

2017 31Wang, Y., E. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Pan, L. Zhang, J. Zeng, Y. Fu, M. Wang, K. Xu, Z. Huang, Z. Wang, H.-Z. Lu, D. Xing, B. Wang, X. Wan, and F. Miao, Gate-tunable negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in the predicted type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nature Communications. 7(1): 13142. 2016 32Lee, J., J. Kwon, E. Lee, J. Park, S. Cha, K. Watanabe, T. Tanig...

work page 2017

[7] [3860]

2020 37Wang, F., G. Shi, K. -W. Kim, H.-J. Park, J.G. Jang, H.R. Tan, M. Lin, Y. Liu, T. Kim, D. Yang, S. Zhao, K. Lee, S. Yang, A. Soumyanarayanan, K. -J. Lee, and H. Yang, Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by two -dimensional PtTe 2/WTe2 van der Waals heterostructures with high spin Hall conductivity. Nature Materials. 23(6): 768-774. ...

work page 2020

[8] [4702]

Imai, F.L

2020 14Zhi, H.Z., T. Imai, F.L. Ning, J.-K. Bao, and G.-H. Cao, NMR Investigation of the Quasi-One- Dimensional Superconductor K2Cr3As3. Physical Review Letters. 114(14): 147004. 2015 15Zhang, W.L., H. Li, D. Xia, H.W. Liu, Y.G. Shi, J.L. Luo, J. Hu, P. Richard, and H. Ding, Observation of a Raman -active phonon with Fano line shape in the quasi -one-dime...

arXiv 2020