Challenges in Understanding Modality Conflict in Vision-Language Models
read the original abstract
This paper highlights the challenge of decomposing conflict detection from conflict resolution in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and presents potential approaches, including using a supervised metric via linear probes and group-based attention pattern analysis. We conduct a mechanistic investigation of LLaVA-OV-7B, a state-of-the-art VLM that exhibits diverse resolution behaviors when faced with conflicting multimodal inputs. Our results show that a linearly decodable conflict signal emerges in the model's intermediate layers and that attention patterns associated with conflict detection and resolution diverge at different stages of the network. These findings support the hypothesis that detection and resolution are functionally distinct mechanisms. We discuss how such decomposition enables more actionable interpretability and targeted interventions for improving model robustness in challenging multimodal settings.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MLLMs Get It Right, Then Get It Wrong: Tracing and Correcting Late-Layer Textual Bias
MLLMs show late-layer textual override of correct visual predictions, with a directional signature enabling a simple inference-time recovery method that improves conflict benchmarks by up to 9.4%.
-
Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models
The survey organizes mechanistic interpretability techniques into a Locate-Steer-Improve framework to enable actionable improvements in LLM alignment, capability, and efficiency.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.