pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2509.13094 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Steady-state entanglement of spin qubits mediated by non-reciprocal and chiral magnons

Martijn Dols , Mikhail Cherkasskii , Victor A. S. V. Bittencourt , Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero , Durga B. R. Dasari , Silvia Viola Kusminskiy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-reciprocal magnonschiral magnonsspin qubitssteady-state entanglementBell stateNV centersYIG filmmagnonic networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Driving spin qubits through non-reciprocal magnons produces a steady-state maximally entangled Bell pair.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a hybrid setup in which a magnet hosting non-reciprocal or chiral magnons creates unidirectional dissipative links between distant spin qubits. When the qubits are driven at the right frequency and strength, the joint steady state converges to the singlet or triplet Bell state. The scheme is simulated for nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to surface magnons in an yttrium iron garnet film, where the magnon coherence length sets the maximum useful separation. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach offers a concrete route to entangle solid-state spins at micron scales without requiring direct coherent interactions or precise timing.

Core claim

Non-reciprocal and chiral magnons mediate unidirectional dissipative coupling between spin qubits; continuous driving of the qubits then stabilizes their joint density matrix at the maximally entangled Bell state, even when qubit decay and dephasing are included, as verified numerically for NV centers near YIG magnon modes whose coherence length exceeds several microns.

What carries the argument

Unidirectional dissipative coupling mediated by non-reciprocal or chiral magnon surface modes, which under qubit driving stabilizes the Bell state by preferentially damping one qubit-qubit correlation.

If this is right

  • The steady state is the Bell state for a wide range of initial conditions once the drive is applied.
  • Entanglement persists over separations set by the magnon coherence length, reaching several microns.
  • Qubit dephasing time directly limits the achievable fidelity of the steady-state entanglement.
  • The same magnonic platform can be used to build networks of multiple entangled spin pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The protocol could be combined with existing magnonic waveguides to distribute entanglement across a chip-scale network.
  • Engineering the non-reciprocity in other magnetic films might extend the scheme beyond YIG.
  • Similar unidirectional coupling might stabilize entanglement in hybrid systems with superconducting qubits.
  • Measuring the steady-state concurrence as a function of drive strength would directly test the predicted stabilization.

Load-bearing premise

The magnon surface modes must supply strong unidirectional coupling while keeping reciprocal channels and losses weak enough that the driven steady state remains close to the ideal Bell state.

What would settle it

A numerical or experimental run of the driven NV-YIG system in which the two-qubit density matrix fails to approach the Bell projector within the magnon coherence length when dephasing is set to realistic values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.13094 by Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero, Durga B. R. Dasari, Martijn Dols, Mikhail Cherkasskii, Silvia Viola Kusminskiy, Victor A. S. V. Bittencourt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Unidirectional coupling scheme between spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Time dynamics according to the Liouvillian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Overview of the chirality and non-reciprocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Two NV centers driven at resonance by a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a). There are two magnon wave numbers ±k− which are resonant with the NV frequency ω− = ω±k− . This also holds for ω+ = ω±k+ , as one can see in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Steady-state overlap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Normalized mode profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a hybrid quantum system in which a magnet supporting non-reciprocal magnons, chiral magnons, or both mediates the dissipative and unidirectional coupling of spin qubits. By driving the qubits, the steady state of this qubit-qubit coupling scheme becomes the maximally entangled Bell state. We devise a protocol where the system converges to this entangled state and benchmark it including qubit decay and dephasing. The protocol is numerically tested on a hybrid system consisting of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers coupled to magnon surface modes of an yttrium iron garnet (YIG) film. We show that the dephasing time of the NV centers forms the bottleneck for achieving the entanglement of NV centers separated by a distance within the magnon coherence length. Our findings identify the key technological requirements and demonstrate a viable route toward steady-state entanglement of solid-state spins over distances of several microns using magnonic quantum networks, expanding the toolbox of magnonics for quantum information purposes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid quantum system in which non-reciprocal or chiral magnons mediate unidirectional dissipative coupling between spin qubits. Driving the qubits is claimed to make the steady state of the resulting master equation the maximally entangled Bell state. A protocol for convergence to this state is presented and numerically benchmarked on NV centers coupled to magnon surface modes in a YIG film, incorporating qubit decay and dephasing; the dephasing time is identified as the bottleneck for entanglement over distances within the magnon coherence length.

Significance. If the assumptions on coupling directionality hold, the work provides a concrete route to steady-state entanglement of solid-state spins over several microns via magnonic networks. The numerical benchmarking that includes realistic qubit decoherence and the explicit identification of technological requirements (dephasing time, coherence length) add practical value and expand the magnonics toolbox for quantum information.

major comments (2)
  1. [YIG-NV numerical benchmark] The central claim that the driven steady state is the unique Bell-state attractor requires strictly unidirectional dissipative coupling with negligible reciprocal channels. In the YIG-NV numerical benchmark, the model assumes magnon coherence length and chirality suffice to suppress reciprocal terms and losses below the qubit dephasing rate, but no quantitative bound or calculation of residual reciprocal contributions is provided; violation of this assumption alters the fixed point of the Lindblad dynamics.
  2. [derivation of effective master equation] The effective master equation leading to the Bell state as steady state is derived under the assumption of purely non-reciprocal/chiral magnon-mediated dissipation. The manuscript does not show an explicit derivation or parameter regime demonstrating that back-action and reciprocal terms remain negligible compared to the engineered unidirectional rates when qubit driving is applied.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the distinction between non-reciprocal and chiral magnon contributions to the coupling Hamiltonian and dissipator in the main text, as the abstract lists them as alternatives or in combination.
  2. Figure captions for the numerical results should explicitly state the values of magnon coherence length, coupling strengths, and dephasing rates used in the simulations to allow direct assessment of the parameter regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative analysis and derivations where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [YIG-NV numerical benchmark] The central claim that the driven steady state is the unique Bell-state attractor requires strictly unidirectional dissipative coupling with negligible reciprocal channels. In the YIG-NV numerical benchmark, the model assumes magnon coherence length and chirality suffice to suppress reciprocal terms and losses below the qubit dephasing rate, but no quantitative bound or calculation of residual reciprocal contributions is provided; violation of this assumption alters the fixed point of the Lindblad dynamics.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative bound strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph and accompanying estimate in the numerical benchmark section. Using the known chirality of Damon-Eshbach surface modes in YIG and the reported magnon coherence length of several microns, we calculate that residual reciprocal rates are suppressed by at least two orders of magnitude relative to the unidirectional dissipative rate and the NV dephasing rate for the parameters employed. This keeps the Bell state as the dominant attractor; we also note the regime in which the assumption would break down. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [derivation of effective master equation] The effective master equation leading to the Bell state as steady state is derived under the assumption of purely non-reciprocal/chiral magnon-mediated dissipation. The manuscript does not show an explicit derivation or parameter regime demonstrating that back-action and reciprocal terms remain negligible compared to the engineered unidirectional rates when qubit driving is applied.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The effective master equation was obtained via the standard Born-Markov treatment of the qubit-magnon interaction in the dispersive regime, but an explicit derivation was omitted from the main text. In the revision we have added an appendix that walks through the derivation step by step, identifies the conditions (weak qubit-magnon coupling relative to magnon linewidth, driving amplitude small compared with magnon decay) under which back-action and reciprocal contributions remain negligible, and confirms consistency with the numerical results that already include realistic decoherence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; forward proposal from physical assumptions to steady-state prediction

full rationale

The manuscript proposes a hybrid magnon-qubit system and shows that, under the assumption of unidirectional dissipative coupling arising from non-reciprocal or chiral magnon surface modes, driving the qubits yields the Bell state as the unique steady state of the driven Lindblad equation. This follows directly from standard open-quantum-system master-equation analysis once the coupling form (unidirectional dissipator) is inserted as an input; the coupling form itself is justified by the engineered properties of YIG magnons rather than by any self-referential definition or fit to the target entanglement. Numerical benchmarks incorporate independent parameters (qubit dephasing time, magnon coherence length) and test convergence without redefining those parameters from the output state. No self-citation chain, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work appear in the derivation. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of magnon non-reciprocity and qubit coherence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable; the proposal implicitly relies on standard assumptions from quantum optics and magnonics regarding coupling strengths and coherence lengths.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1084 out tokens · 40312 ms · 2026-05-18T16:28:26.585759+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The parameterζcontrols the transient timet s required to reach the steady state, such thatt s → ∞forζ→0 (see Fig

    Thus, for sufficiently large driving with respect to the dissipative coupling, the steady state is maximally entangled (and pure), contrary to its bidi- rectional equivalent [7, 8]. The parameterζcontrols the transient timet s required to reach the steady state, such thatt s → ∞forζ→0 (see Fig. 9 in App. C). 4 III. PROTOCOL We propose a protocol in which ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    waveguides

    For spin 1/2, we express the spin raising and lowering operator in terms of the transition operators such that ˆSS=1/2 ± =ℏˆσ±. We implement these relations and Eq. (18) in the Hamiltonian (17), on which we apply the RWA, giving ˆH S=1/2 int = ℏ√ 2 X k (gk,−ˆσ+ ˆmk +g ∗ k,− ˆm† kˆσ−),(19) where gk,α =γ sµ0δHk(r0)·e α.(20) The coupling constantg k,− vanish...

    work page

  3. [3]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Physical Review Letters70, 2273 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys- ical Review Letters70, 2269 (1993)

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Su´ arez-Forero, M

    D. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral Quantum Optics: Recent Developments and Future Directions, PRX Quantum6, 020101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum- optical networks, New Journal of Physics14, 063014 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Pichler, T

    H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum optics of chiral spin networks, Physical Review A 91, 042116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Gonzalez-Tudela, D

    A. Gonzalez-Tudela, D. Martin-Cano, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, C. Tejedor, and F. J. Garcia- Vidal, Entanglement of Two Qubits Mediated by One- Dimensional Plasmonic Waveguides, Physical Review Letters106, 020501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Gonz´ alez-Tudela and D

    A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela and D. Porras, Mesoscopic Entan- glement Induced by Spontaneous Emission in Solid- State Quantum Optics, Physical Review Letters110, 080502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Gisin, G

    N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Quan- tum cryptography, Reviews of Modern Physics74, 145 (2002)

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    A. M. Steane, Error Correcting Codes in Quantum The- ory, Physical Review Letters77, 793 (1996)

    work page 1996

  13. [13]

    Corlett, I

    C. Corlett, I. ˇCepait˙ e, A. J. Daley, C. Gus- tiani, G. Pelegr´ ı, J. D. Pritchard, N. Linden, and P. Skrzypczyk, Speeding Up Quantum Measurement Using Space-Time Trade-Off, Physical Review Letters 134, 080801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    I. J. Luxmoore, N. A. Wasley, A. J. Ramsay, A. C. T. Thijssen, R. Oulton, M. Hugues, S. Kasture, V. G. Achanta, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick, Interfacing Spins in an InGaAs Quantum Dot to a Semiconduc- tor Waveguide Circuit Using Emitted Photons, Physical Review Letters110, 037402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    I. J. Luxmoore, N. A. Wasley, A. J. Ramsay, A. C. T. Thijssen, R. Oulton, M. Hugues, A. M. Fox, and M. S. Skolnick, Optical control of the emission direction of a quantum dot, Applied Physics Letters103, 241102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled direc- tional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanopho- tonic waveguide, Nature Communications5, 5713 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    R. J. Coles, D. M. Price, J. E. Dixon, B. Royall, E. Clarke, P. Kok, M. S. Skolnick, A. M. Fox, and M. N. Makhonin, Chirality of nanophotonic waveguide with embedded quantum emitter for unidirectional spin transfer, Nature Communications7, 11183 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    S¨ ollner, S

    I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kirˇ sansk˙ e, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, De- 16 terministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits, Nature Nanotechnology10, 775 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Z. Yang, S. Aghaeimeibodi, and E. Waks, Chiral light- matter interactions using spin-valley states in transition metal dichalcogenides, Optics Express27, 21367 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    N. O. Antoniadis, N. Tomm, T. Jakubczyk, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, R. J. War- burton, and A. Javadi, A chiral one-dimensional atom using a quantum dot in an open microcavity, npj Quan- tum Information8, 27 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Shreiner, K

    R. Shreiner, K. Hao, A. Butcher, and A. A. High, Elec- trically controllable chirality in a nanophotonic interface with a two-dimensional semiconductor, Nature Photon- ics16, 330 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    T. P. Lyons, D. J. Gillard, C. Leblanc, J. Puebla, D. D. Solnyshkov, L. Klompmaker, I. A. Akimov, C. Louca, P. Muduli, A. Genco, M. Bayer, Y. Otani, G. Malpuech, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Giant effective Zeeman splitting in a monolayer semiconductor realized by spin-selective strong light–matter coupling, Nature Photonics16, 632 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    M. J. R. Staunstrup, A. Tiranov, Y. Wang, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, L. Midolo, N. Rotenberg, P. Lodahl, and H. Le Jeannic, Direct observation of a few-photon phase shift induced by a single quantum emitter in a waveguide, Nature Communications15, 7583 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, J. Wrachtrup, and B. B. Zhou, Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins, Nature Photonics12, 516–527 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Applied Physics Express12, 070101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Schmidt, C

    G. Schmidt, C. Hauser, P. Trempler, M. Paleschke, and E. T. Papaioannou, Ultra Thin Films of Yttrium Iron Garnet with Very Low Damping: A Review, physica status solidi (b)257, 1900644 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    A. V. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adel- mann, A. O. Adeyeye, J. ˚Akerman, F. G. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad, C. H. Back, A. Barman, G. E. W. Bauer, M. Becherer, E. N. Beginin, V. A. S. V. Bit- tencourt, Y. M. Blanter, P. Bortolotti, I. Boventer, D. A. Bozhko, S. A. Bunyaev, J. J. Carmiggelt, R. R. Cheenikundil, F. Ciubotaru, S. Cotofana, G. Csaba, ...

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintron- ics meets quantum information science, Physics Reports Quantum Magnonics: When Magnon Spintronics Meets Quantum Information Science,965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Zare Rameshti, S

    B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Physics Reports Cavity Magnonics, 979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Bar- sukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Aker- man, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. Hillebrands, S. V. Kusminskiy, W. Zhang, C. R. Du, A. Finco, T. van der Sar, Y. K...

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Weiler, H

    M. Weiler, H. Huebl, F. S. Goerg, F. D. Czeschka, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Spin Pumping with Coherent Elastic Waves, Physical Review Letters 108, 176601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Cavity magnomechanics, Science Advances2, e1501286 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    K. An, A. N. Litvinenko, R. Kohno, A. A. Fuad, V. V. Naletov, L. Vila, U. Ebels, G. de Loubens, H. Hurd- equint, N. Beaulieu, J. Ben Youssef, N. Vukadinovic, G. E. W. Bauer, A. N. Slavin, V. S. Tiberkevich, and O. Klein, Coherent long-range transfer of angular mo- mentum between magnon Kittel modes by phonons, Physical Review B101, 060407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    C. A. Potts, E. Varga, V. A. S. V. Bittencourt, S. V. Kusminskiy, and J. P. Davis, Dynamical Backaction Magnomechanics, Physical Review X11, 031053 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Schlitz, L

    R. Schlitz, L. Siegl, T. Sato, W. Yu, G. E. W. Bauer, H. Huebl, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Magnetization dynamics affected by phonon pumping, Physical Review B106, 014407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    M¨ uller, Chiral phonons and phononic birefringence in ferromagnetic metal–bulk acoustic resonator hybrids, Physical Review B109, 024430 (2024)

    M. M¨ uller, Chiral phonons and phononic birefringence in ferromagnetic metal–bulk acoustic resonator hybrids, Physical Review B109, 024430 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    ¨O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatt´ e, Strong Field Interactions between a Nanomagnet and a Photonic Cavity, Physical Review Letters104, 077202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goen- nenwein, High Cooperativity in Coupled Microwave Resonator Ferrimagnetic Insulator Hybrids, Physical Review Letters111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing Ferromag- netic Magnons and Microwave Photons in the Quantum Limit, Physical Review Letters113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly Coupled Magnons and Cavity Microwave Pho- tons, Physical Review Letters113, 156401 (2014). 17

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y. Fan, M. Kostylev, and M. E. Tobar, High-Cooperativity Cav- ity QED with Magnons at Microwave Frequencies, Phys- ical Review Applied2, 054002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Osada, R

    A. Osada, R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, Y. Tabuchi, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, M. Nomura, and Y. Nakamura, Cavity Optomagnonics with Spin- Orbit Coupled Photons, Physical Review Letters116, 223601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    T. Liu, X. Zhang, H. X. Tang, and M. E. Flatt´ e, Op- tomagnonics in magnetic solids, Physical Review B94, 060405 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Viola Kusminskiy, H

    S. Viola Kusminskiy, H. X. Tang, and F. Marquardt, Coupled spin-light dynamics in cavity optomagnonics, Physical Review A94, 033821 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Zhang, N

    X. Zhang, N. Zhu, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Opto- magnonic Whispering Gallery Microresonators, Physi- cal Review Letters117, 123605 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    J. A. Haigh, N. J. Lambert, S. Sharma, Y. M. Blanter, G. E. W. Bauer, and A. J. Ramsay, Selection rules for cavity-enhanced Brillouin light scattering from magne- tostatic modes, Physical Review B97, 214423 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science349, 405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a super- conducting qubit, Science367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    S. P. Wolski, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, A. Noguchi, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Dissipation- Based Quantum Sensing of Magnons with a Supercon- ducting Qubit, Physical Review Letters125, 117701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Kounalakis, G

    M. Kounalakis, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Analog Quantum Control of Magnonic Cat States on a Chip by a Superconducting Qubit, Physical Review Letters129, 037205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Xu, X.-K

    D. Xu, X.-K. Gu, H.-K. Li, Y.-C. Weng, Y.-P. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum Control of a Single Magnon in a Macroscopic Spin Sys- tem, Physical Review Letters130, 193603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    M. Dols, S. Sharma, L. Bechara, Y. M. Blanter, M. Kounalakis, and S. Viola Kusminskiy, Magnon- mediated quantum gates for superconducting qubits, Physical Review B110, 104416 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Trifunovic, F

    L. Trifunovic, F. L. Pedrocchi, and D. Loss, Long- Distance Entanglement of Spin Qubits via Ferromagnet, Physical Review X3, 041023 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. van der Sar, and A. Yacoby, Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature Reviews Materials3, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Flebus and Y

    B. Flebus and Y. Tserkovnyak, Entangling distant spin qubits via a magnetic domain wall, Physical Review B 99, 140403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Bertelli, J

    I. Bertelli, J. J. Carmiggelt, T. Yu, B. G. Simon, C. C. Pothoven, G. E. W. Bauer, Y. M. Blanter, J. Aarts, and T. van der Sar, Magnetic resonance imaging of spin- wave transport and interference in a magnetic insulator, Science Advances6, eabd3556 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Neuman, D

    T. Neuman, D. S. Wang, and P. Narang, Nano- magnonic Cavities for Strong Spin-Magnon Coupling and Magnon-Mediated Spin-Spin Interactions, Physical Review Letters125, 247702 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Fukami, D

    M. Fukami, D. R. Candido, D. D. Awschalom, and M. E. Flatt´ e, Opportunities for Long-Range Magnon- Mediated Entanglement of Spin Qubits via On- and Off- Resonant Coupling, PRX Quantum2, 040314 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, T

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, T. Van Der Sar, and O. Romero-Isart, Towards a quantum interface between spin waves and paramagnetic spin baths, Physical Review B105, 075410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Het´ enyi, A

    B. Het´ enyi, A. Mook, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Long-distance coupling of spin qubits via topological magnons, Physical Review B106, 235409 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    Karanikolas, T

    V. Karanikolas, T. Kuroda, and J.-i. Inoue, Magnon- mediated spin entanglement in the strong-coupling regime, Physical Review Research4, 043180 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Fukami, J

    M. Fukami, J. C. Marcks, D. R. Candido, L. R. Weiss, B. Soloway, S. E. Sullivan, N. Delegan, F. J. Here- mans, M. E. Flatt´ e, and D. D. Awschalom, Magnon- mediated qubit coupling determined via dissipation measurements, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2313754120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Bejarano, F

    M. Bejarano, F. J. T. Goncalves, T. Hache, M. Hol- lenbach, C. Heins, T. Hula, L. K¨ orber, J. Heinze, Y. Berenc´ en, M. Helm, J. Fassbender, G. V. Astakhov, and H. Schultheiss, Parametric magnon transduction to spin qubits, Science Advances10, eadi2042 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    M.-L. Peng, M. Tian, X.-C. Chen, M.-F. Wang, G.- Q. Zhang, H.-C. Li, and W. Xiong, Cavity magnon– polariton interface for strong spin–spin coupling, Optics Letters50, 1516 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Z. Xue, J. Zou, C. Cai, G. E. W. Bauer, and T. Yu, Directional entanglement of spin-orbit locked nitrogen- vacancy centers by magnons (2025), arXiv:2505.07325

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    R. W. Damon and J. R. Eshbach, Magnetostatic modes of a ferromagnet slab, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids19, 308 (1961)

    work page 1961

  68. [68]

    J. P. Parekh, K. W. Chang, and H. S. Tuan, Propa- gation characteristics of magnetostatic waves, Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing4, 9 (1985)

    work page 1985

  69. [69]

    Udvardi and L

    L. Udvardi and L. Szunyogh, Chiral Asymmetry of the Spin-Wave Spectra in Ultrathin Magnetic Films, Phys- ical Review Letters102, 207204 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P

    D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P. Landeros, Influence of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction on the spin-wave spectra of thin films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 156001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Belmeguenai, J.-P

    M. Belmeguenai, J.-P. Adam, Y. Roussign´ e, S. Eimer, T. Devolder, J.-V. Kim, S. M. Cherif, A. Stashkevich, and A. Thiaville, Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya in- teraction in perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/AlO x ultrathin films measured by Brillouin light spectroscopy, Physical Review B91, 180405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Tacchi, R

    S. Tacchi, R. E. Troncoso, M. Ahlberg, G. Gubbiotti, M. Madami, J. ˚Akerman, and P. Landeros, Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Pt/CoFeB Films: Effect of the Heavy-Metal Thickness, Physical Review Letters118, 147201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    R. A. Gallardo, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, T. Schneider, A. Rold´ an-Molina, F. Ma, R. E. Troncoso, K. Lenz, H. Fangohr, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Flat Bands, Indirect Gaps, and Unconventional Spin-Wave Behav- ior Induced by a Periodic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Inter- action, Physical Review Letters122, 067204 (2019). 18

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    J. A. Ot´ alora, M. Yan, H. Schultheiss, R. Hertel, and A. K´ akay, Curvature-Induced Asymmetric Spin- Wave Dispersion, Physical Review Letters117, 227203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    K¨ orber, R

    L. K¨ orber, R. Verba, J. A. Ot´ alora, V. Kravchuk, J. Lindner, J. Fassbender, and A. K´ akay, Curvilinear spin-wave dynamics beyond the thin-shell approxima- tion: Magnetic nanotubes as a case study, Physical Re- view B106, 014405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Hillebrands, Spin-wave calculations for multilayered structures, Physical Review B41, 530 (1990)

    B. Hillebrands, Spin-wave calculations for multilayered structures, Physical Review B41, 530 (1990)

    work page 1990

  77. [77]

    Zakeri, Y

    Kh. Zakeri, Y. Zhang, J. Prokop, T.-H. Chuang, N. Sakr, W. X. Tang, and J. Kirschner, Asymmetric Spin-Wave Dispersion on Fe(110): Direct Evidence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, Physical Review Letters104, 137203 (2010)

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    R. A. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, T. Schneider, C. Gonzalez-Fuentes, A. Rold´ an-Molina, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Spin-wave non-reciprocity in magnetization-graded ferromagnetic films, New Jour- nal of Physics21, 033026 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Gallardo, T

    R. Gallardo, T. Schneider, A. Chaurasiya, A. Oelschl¨ agel, S. Arekapudi, A. Rold´ an-Molina, R. H¨ ubner, K. Lenz, A. Barman, J. Fassbender, J. Lindner, O. Hellwig, and P. Landeros, Reconfig- urable Spin-Wave Nonreciprocity Induced by Dipolar Interaction in a Coupled Ferromagnetic Bilayer, Physical Review Applied12, 034012 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Gallardo, M

    R. Gallardo, M. Weigand, K. Schultheiss, A. Kakay, R. Mattheis, J. Raabe, G. Sch¨ utz, A. Deac, J. Lind- ner, and S. Wintz, Coherent Magnons with Giant Non- reciprocity at Nanoscale Wavelengths, ACS Nano18, 5249 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.