Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assessing speech quality metrics for evaluation of neural audio codecs under clean speech conditions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.24457 v1 pith:C3446NMQ submitted 2025-09-29 eess.AS cs.AIcs.SDeess.SP

classification eess.AScs.AIcs.SDeess.SP
keywords metricsqualitysubjectivescoresspeechacrosscleancodec
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Objective speech-quality metrics are widely used to assess codec performance. However, for neural codecs, it is often unclear which metrics provide reliable quality estimates. To address this, we evaluated 45 objective metrics by correlating their scores with subjective listening scores for clean speech across 17 codec conditions. Neural-based metrics such as scoreq and utmos achieved the highest Pearson correlations with subjective scores. Further analysis across different subjective quality ranges revealed that non-intrusive metrics tend to saturate at high subjective quality levels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools