pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.02256 · v4 · submitted 2025-10-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Fate of entanglement in open quantum spin liquid: Time evolution of its genuine multipartite negativity upon sudden coupling to a dissipative bosonic environment

Federico Garcia-Gaitan , Branislav K. Nikolic This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 10:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantum spin liquidKitaev modelgenuine multipartite negativityopen quantum systemsMarkovian dynamicsnon-Markovian dynamicsbosonic bathWilson loop
0
0 comments X

The pith

In open Kitaev quantum spin liquids, genuine multipartite negativity survives only inside hexagonal loopy subregions and decays with the Wilson loop under Markovian dissipation but lasts to higher temperatures in non-Markovian regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how entanglement in the Kitaev quantum spin liquid changes when the system is suddenly coupled to an infinite Caldeira-Leggett bosonic bath and then evolved in time. It extracts genuine multipartite negativity from the density matrices of different subregions to track both the stability and the spatial pattern of entanglement. In the Markovian regime this negativity stays nonzero only inside hexagonal regions that contain loops and disappears on the same timescale as the expectation value of the Wilson loop operator; in the non-Markovian regime the negativity persists to much higher temperatures while remaining absent from non-loopy subregions. The non-Markovian evolution also generates emergent interactions among the spins.

Core claim

When the Kitaev model is made open by sudden coupling to a Caldeira-Leggett bosonic bath, the time-dependent genuine multipartite negativity extracted from subregion density matrices remains nonzero exclusively in hexagonal loopy subregions under Markovian evolution and vanishes on the same timescale on which the Wilson-loop expectation value vanishes; under non-Markovian dynamics with memory effects it remains nonzero up to much higher temperatures while staying zero in non-loopy subregions, and the dynamics generate emergent spin interactions.

What carries the argument

Genuine multipartite negativity computed from the reduced density matrix of chosen subregions, used to map which geometric patches of the lattice retain multipartite entanglement after the system is opened to the bath.

If this is right

  • Multipartite entanglement in quantum spin liquids is spatially selective to loop-containing regions even after the system is opened to dissipation.
  • Non-Markovian memory effects can protect entanglement against thermal decoherence up to temperatures higher than those allowed by Markovian baths.
  • Time-dependent dissipation can be engineered to produce new effective interactions among the spins of the quantum spin liquid.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice geometry may therefore be used as a design handle to protect entanglement in candidate quantum-spin-liquid materials exposed to realistic environments.
  • The same geometric selectivity could appear in other quantum spin liquid models once they are coupled to bosonic baths, suggesting a broader principle for open-system topological phases.

Load-bearing premise

Sudden coupling to an infinite Caldeira-Leggett bosonic bath captures the essential dissipative environment of candidate quantum-spin-liquid materials without needing further microscopic details of the solid-state bath or finite-size corrections.

What would settle it

A direct numerical or experimental check of whether genuine multipartite negativity inside hexagonal plaquettes drops to zero at the same moment the Wilson-loop expectation value reaches zero when the system is driven by a memoryless Markovian bath.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.02256 by Branislav K. Nikolic, Federico Garcia-Gaitan.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The same information as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Renormalized exchange interactions of Kitaev QSL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many-body entanglement properties of quantum spin liquids (QSLs), persisting at arbitrarily long distances, have been intensely explored over the past two decades, but mostly for QSLs viewed as {\em closed} quantum systems. However, in experiments and potential quantum computing applications, candidate materials for this exotic phase of quantum matter will always interact with a dissipative environment, such as the one generated by bosonic quasiparticles in solids at finite temperature. Here we investigate both the {\em stability} and {\em spatial distribution} of entanglement for the Kitaev model of QSL, which is made {\em open} by its sudden coupling to an infinite bosonic bath of Caldeira-Leggett type and then time-evolved in both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes. From the time-dependent density matrix of QSL subregions, we extract genuine multipartite negativity (GMN), quantum Fisher information, spin-spin correlators, and the expectation value (EV) of the Wilson loop operator. In particular, time dependence of GMN offers the most penetrating insights: ({\em i}) in the Markovian regime, it remains nonzero only in hexagonal loopy subregions of QSL (as also discovered very recently for closed QSLs), eventually vanishing on the same timescale on which the EV of the Wilson loop operator vanishes; ({\em ii}) in the non-Markovian regime with pronounced memory effects, surprisingly, GMN remains nonzero up to much higher temperatures while also remaining zero in non-loopy subregions. In addition, the non-Markovian dynamics generates emergent interactions between spins, thereby opening avenues for tailoring properties of QSL via engineering of dissipation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the time evolution of genuine multipartite negativity (GMN) in the Kitaev quantum spin liquid after sudden linear coupling to an infinite Caldeira-Leggett bosonic bath. It computes the reduced density matrix for subregions in both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes, extracting GMN, quantum Fisher information, spin-spin correlators, and the Wilson-loop expectation value. The central numerical findings are that, in the Markovian limit, GMN survives only inside hexagonal loopy subregions and decays on the same timescale as the Wilson-loop EV, while in the non-Markovian regime GMN persists to higher bath temperatures and remains strictly zero outside loopy subregions; the non-Markovian dynamics is also reported to generate emergent spin interactions.

Significance. If the reported GMN behavior is robust, the work supplies concrete evidence that dissipation can both destroy and spatially reorganize multipartite entanglement in a QSL, with non-Markovian memory effects providing a route to higher-temperature stability. The explicit comparison of GMN with the Wilson-loop operator and the observation of emergent interactions constitute a clear advance over closed-system studies and are directly relevant to candidate materials and open-system quantum-information proposals.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model section] Model section (Caldeira-Leggett coupling): the central claim that GMN vanishes only in loopy subregions on the Wilson-loop timescale in the Markovian regime and survives to higher temperatures in the non-Markovian regime rests on the assumption that the infinite ohmic bath with standard spectral density fully captures the decoherence of Majorana and flux degrees of freedom. The manuscript does not report tests of sensitivity to finite bath size, phonon dispersion, or non-linear spin-bath couplings that would modify the memory kernel; such tests are needed to establish that the reported spatial support and temperature scales are not artifacts of the idealized bath.
  2. [Numerical results] Numerical results (time-evolution figures): the abstract and main text state clear trends for GMN versus Wilson-loop EV but supply no error bars, convergence checks with respect to bath discretization or time-step size, or explicit values of the system-bath coupling strength and cutoff frequency. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reported coincidence of timescales in the Markovian case and the strict zero in non-loopy regions are free of post-hoc parameter choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'as also discovered very recently for closed QSLs' requires an explicit citation to the relevant closed-system work.
  2. [Figures] All time-dependent plots should include a legend distinguishing Markovian from non-Markovian curves and should state the numerical values of temperature, coupling strength, and cutoff used for each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the significance of our findings on the fate of genuine multipartite negativity under dissipation. We address each major comment below and indicate the changes made in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model section] Model section (Caldeira-Leggett coupling): the central claim that GMN vanishes only in loopy subregions on the Wilson-loop timescale in the Markovian regime and survives to higher temperatures in the non-Markovian regime rests on the assumption that the infinite ohmic bath with standard spectral density fully captures the decoherence of Majorana and flux degrees of freedom. The manuscript does not report tests of sensitivity to finite bath size, phonon dispersion, or non-linear spin-bath couplings that would modify the memory kernel; such tests are needed to establish that the reported spatial support and temperature scales are not artifacts of the idealized bath.

    Authors: We agree that additional sensitivity tests would strengthen the work. The infinite Caldeira-Leggett bath with ohmic spectral density is the standard model for capturing both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes in open quantum spin systems, and it is widely used in the literature for similar problems. Exhaustive numerical tests with finite bath sizes or non-linear couplings are computationally demanding and lie outside the scope of the present study, which isolates the effects of linear dissipation on the Kitaev QSL. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Model section with a paragraph justifying the bath choice, explaining why the qualitative features (spatial restriction to loopy subregions and the reported temperature scales) arise from the topological structure of the model and the form of the system-bath coupling, and briefly discussing expected robustness to moderate changes in dispersion or bath size. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical results] Numerical results (time-evolution figures): the abstract and main text state clear trends for GMN versus Wilson-loop EV but supply no error bars, convergence checks with respect to bath discretization or time-step size, or explicit values of the system-bath coupling strength and cutoff frequency. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reported coincidence of timescales in the Markovian case and the strict zero in non-loopy regions are free of post-hoc parameter choices.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised manuscript we have added statistical error bars to all time-evolution plots of GMN, Wilson-loop expectation value, and related quantities, obtained by averaging over independent realizations. We have also included a new appendix that reports convergence tests with respect to the number of discretized bath modes and the integration time step. Finally, we now state explicitly the values of the system-bath coupling strength and cutoff frequency employed, together with a short justification that the reported timescales and spatial patterns remain stable under small variations of these parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to closed QSL results is not load-bearing for open-system GMN computation

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by constructing the time-dependent density matrix of the Kitaev QSL via the open-system master equation after sudden linear coupling to an infinite Caldeira-Leggett bath, then extracting GMN, Wilson-loop EV, and other quantities directly from the resulting reduced density matrices of subregions. The parenthetical reference to recent closed-QSL findings supplies context for comparison but does not enter the equations that generate the reported Markovian or non-Markovian GMN behavior. No fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional identities appear, and the central claims follow from the explicit Lindblad or non-Markovian dynamics rather than from any self-citation chain. The computation is therefore self-contained against the master-equation input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the Kitaev Hamiltonian as the closed-system starting point and the Caldeira-Leggett model for the bosonic bath; both are standard but introduce modeling assumptions whose validity for real materials is not independently verified here.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Kitaev model on the honeycomb lattice realizes a quantum spin liquid with topological order characterized by the Wilson loop operator.
    Invoked implicitly when linking GMN decay to Wilson-loop expectation value.
  • domain assumption Sudden coupling to an infinite Caldeira-Leggett bosonic bath produces Markovian or non-Markovian dynamics depending on the spectral density and temperature.
    Central to the distinction between the two dynamical regimes studied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5853 in / 1428 out tokens · 33409 ms · 2026-05-18T10:13:47.950261+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Engineering a driven-dissipative bath of altermagnetic quantum magnons for controlling classical dynamics of spins hosting spin waves, domain walls, or skyrmions

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A driven-dissipative altermagnetic magnon bath generates an extended LLG equation with two spatially nonlocal anisotropic damping terms, one non-Markovian, for controlling classical spin dynamics in AMI/FI bilayers.

  2. Network-Irreducible Multiparty Entanglement in Quantum Matter

    quant-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GNME quantifies entanglement that cannot be prepared from lower-party network resources, revealing sharp peaks at criticality in the Ising model and absence in some spin liquids where GME is strong.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, 6 Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Grover, Y

    T. Grover, Y. Zhang, and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement entropy as a portal to the physics of quantum spin liquids, New J. Phys.15, 025002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar,et al., Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Knolle and R

    J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 451 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Knolle, D

    J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Dynamics of a two-dimensional quantum spin liquid: Signatures of emergent Majorana fermions and fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 207203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Do, S.-Y

    S.-H. Do, S.-Y. Park, J. Yoshitake, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, Y. Kwon, D. T. Adroja, D. J. Voneshen, K. Kim, T.-H. Jang,et al., Majorana fermions in the Kitaev quantum spin systemα-RuCl 3, Nat. Phys.13, 1079 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Nasu, Majorana quasiparticles emergent in Kitaev spin liquid, Prog

    J. Nasu, Majorana quasiparticles emergent in Kitaev spin liquid, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2024, 08C104 (2023)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Harada, A

    C. Harada, A. Ono, and J. Nasu, Real-time control of non-Abelian anyons in Kitaev spin liquid under energy dissipation, Phys. Rev. B110, 214426 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Zhu, S.-s

    W. Zhu, S.-s. Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Identifying spinon excitations from dynamic structure factor of spin- 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the Kagome lattice, PNAS116, 5437 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. Aczel, L. Li, M. Stone, G. Granroth, M. Lumsden, Y. Yiu, J. Knolle, et al., Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet, Nat. Mater.15, 733 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Banerjee, J

    A. Banerjee, J. Yan, J. Knolle, C. Bridges, M. Stone, M. Lumsden, D. Mandrus, D. Tennant, R. Moessner, and S. Nagler, Neutron scattering in the proximate quantum spin liquidα-RuCl 3, Science356, 1055 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    C. Balz, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, J. Yan, Z. Lu, X. Hu, S. M. Yadav, Y. Takano, Y. Liu, D. A. Tennant, et al., Finite field regime for a quantum spin liquid in α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B100, 060405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Kasahara, S

    Y. Kasahara, S. Suetsugu, T. Asaba, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and Y. Matsuda, Quantized and unquantized thermal Hall conductance of the Kitaev spin liquid candidateα−RuCl 3, Phys. Rev. B 106, L060410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    S. M. Winter, K. Riedl, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Chernyshev, A. Honecker, and R. Valent´ ı, Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet, Nat. Commun.8, 1152 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    P. A. Maksimov and A. L. Chernyshev, Rethinking α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033011 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    I. H. Kim, M. Levin, T.-C. Lin, D. Ranard, and B. Shi, Universal lower bound on topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 166601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Levin, Physical proof of the topological entanglement entropy inequality, Phys

    M. Levin, Physical proof of the topological entanglement entropy inequality, Phys. Rev. B110, 165154 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    J. C. Bridgeman, S. T. Flammia, and D. Poulin, Detect- ing topological order with ribbon operators, Phys. Rev. B94, 205123 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    S. T. Flammia, A. Hamma, T. L. Hughes, and X.-G. Wen, Topological entanglement R´ enyi entropy and re- duced density matrix structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 261601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Zou and J

    L. Zou and J. Haah, Spurious long-range entanglement and replica correlation length, Phys. Rev. B94, 075151 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    L. Lyu, D. Chandorkar, S. Kapoor, S. Takei, E. S. Sørensen, and W. Witczak-Krempa, Multiparty entan- glement loops in quantum spin liquids, arXiv:2505.18124 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Jungnitsch, T

    B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, and O. G¨ uhne, Taming mul- tiparticle entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 190502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Hofmann, T

    M. Hofmann, T. Moroder, and O. G¨ uhne, Analytical characterization of the genuine multiparticle negativity, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 155301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Song, T.-T

    M. Song, T.-T. Wang, L. Lyu, W. Witczak-Krempa, and Z. Y. Meng, Entanglement architecture of beyond- Landau quantum criticality, arXiv:2509.09983 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413 (1996)

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and T. Grover, Detecting topo- logical order at finite temperature using entanglement negativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Lu and S

    T.-C. Lu and S. Vijay, Characterizing long-range entan- glement in a mixed state through an emergent order on the entangling surface, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033031 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    R. Fan, Y. Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diag- nostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum memory, PRX Quantum5, 020343 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. J. W. Giulini, J. Kupsch, and I.-O. Stamatescu,Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory(Springer, Cham, 2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Merkli, I

    M. Merkli, I. M. Sigal, and G. P. Berman, Decoherence and thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 130401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    T. D. Ellison and M. Cheng, Toward a classification of mixed-state topological orders in two dimensions, PRX Quantum6, 010315 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Sohal and A

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010313 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010314 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    G. E. Fux, D. Kilda, B. W. Lovett, and J. Keeling, Ten- sor network simulation of chains of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033078 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    G. E. Fux, P. Fowler-Wright, J. Beckles, E. P. But- ler, P. R. Eastham, D. Gribben, J. Keeling, D. Kilda, P. Kirton, E. D. C. Lawrence,et al., OQuPy: A Python package to efficiently simulate non-Markovian open quan- tum systems with process tensors, J. Chem. Phys.161, 124108 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Cygorek, J

    M. Cygorek, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Sublinear scaling in non-Markovian open quantum sys- tems simulations, Phys. Rev. X14, 011010 (2024). 7

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Cygorek and E

    M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, ACE: a general-purpose non-Markovian open quantum systems simulation toolkit based on process tensors, J. Chem. Phys.161, 074111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Nathan and M

    F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Quantifying the accuracy of steady states obtained from the universal Lindblad equation, Phys. Rev. B109, 205140 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Reyes-Osorio, F

    F. Reyes-Osorio, F. Garcia-Gaitan, D. J. Strachan, P. Plechac, S. R. Clark, and B. K. Nikoli´ c, Schwinger- keldysh nonperturbative field theory of open quan- tum systems beyond the Markovian regime: Ap- plication to spin-boson and spin-chain-boson models, arXiv:2405.00765 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Nathan and M

    F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Universal Lindblad equa- tion for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 115109 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    K. Yang, S. C. Morampudi, and E. J. Bergholtz, Excep- tional spin liquids from couplings to the environment, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 077201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    K. Yang, D. Varjas, E. J. Bergholtz, S. Morampudi, and F. Wilczek, Exceptional dynamics of interacting spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L042025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Kulkarni, T

    A. Kulkarni, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Lindbladian dy- namics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075138 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Shackleton and M

    H. Shackleton and M. S. Scheurer, Exactly solvable dis- sipative spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B109, 085115 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Hwang, Mixed-state quantum spin liquids and dynam- ical anyon condensations in Kitaev Lindbladians, Quan- tum8, 1412 (2024)

    K. Hwang, Mixed-state quantum spin liquids and dynam- ical anyon condensations in Kitaev Lindbladians, Quan- tum8, 1412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Coser and D

    A. Coser and D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution, Quantum 3, 174 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  53. [53]

    Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation, AIP Adv.10, 025106 (2020)

    D. Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation, AIP Adv.10, 025106 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Pocklington and A

    A. Pocklington and A. A. Clerk, Efficient simulation of nontrivial dissipative spin chains via stochastic unravel- ing, PRX Quantum6, 030349 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Gul´ acsi and G

    B. Gul´ acsi and G. Burkard, Signatures of non- Markovianity of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Schaller,Open Quantum Systems Far from Equilib- rium(Springer, Cham, 2014)

    G. Schaller,Open Quantum Systems Far from Equilib- rium(Springer, Cham, 2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Anto-Sztrikacs, B

    N. Anto-Sztrikacs, B. Min, M. Brenes, and D. Segal, Ef- fective Hamiltonian theory: An approximation to the equilibrium state of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B108, 115437 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    B. Min, N. Anto-Sztrikacs, M. Brenes, and D. Segal, Bath-engineering magnetic order in quantum spin chains: An analytic mapping approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 266701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  62. [62]

    G¨ uhne and G

    O. G¨ uhne and G. T´ oth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep.474, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    G. D. Chiara and A. Sanpera, Genuine quantum correla- tions in quantum many-body systems: a review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 074002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Scheie, P

    A. Scheie, P. Laurell, A. M. Samarakoon, B. Lake, S. E. Nagler, G. E. Granroth, S. Okamoto, G. Alvarez, and D. A. Tennant, Witnessing entanglement in quantum magnets using neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B103, 224434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Hales, U

    J. Hales, U. Bajpai, T. Liu, D. R. Baykusheva, M. Li, M. Mitrano, and Y. Wang, Witnessing light-driven en- tanglement using time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, Nat. Commun.14, 3512 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D10, 2445 (1974)

    work page 1974

  67. [67]

    M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Quasiadiabatic contin- uation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. B72, 045141 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Anders, C

    J. Anders, C. Sait, and S. Horsley, Quantum Brownian motion for magnets, New J. Phys.24, 033020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Garcia-Gaitan and B

    F. Garcia-Gaitan and B. K. Nikoli´ c, Fate of entangle- ment in magnetism under Lindbladian or non-Markovian dynamics and conditions for their transition to Landau- Lifshitz-Gilbert classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, L180408 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Szpak, G

    N. Szpak, G. Schaller, R. Sch¨ utzhold, and J. K¨ onig, Re- laxation to persistent currents in a Hubbard trimer cou- pled to fermionic baths, Phys. Rev. B110, 115131 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Schnell, Global becomes local: Efficient many-body dynamics for global master equations, Phys

    A. Schnell, Global becomes local: Efficient many-body dynamics for global master equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 250401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv

    A. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu` ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su´ arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agar- wal,et al., QuTiP 5: The quantum toolbox in python, arXiv:2412.04705 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University, Oxford, 2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    Y. Sun, G. Wang, and Z. Cai, Simulation of spin chains with off-diagonal coupling using the inchworm method, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 9321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    M. Xu, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, Environment-mediated long-ranged correlations in many-body system, J. Chem. Phys.161, 124105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    L. P. Lindoy, D. Rodrigo-Albert, Y. Rath, and I. Rung- ger, pyTTN: an open source toolbox for open and closed system quantum dynamics simulations using tree tensor networks, arXiv:2503.15460 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Tanimura and R

    Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, Time evolution of a quan- tum system in contact with a nearly Gaussian-Markoffian noise bath, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn58, 101 (1989)

    work page 1989

  80. [80]

    Xu and J

    M. Xu and J. Ankerhold, About the performance of per- turbative treatments of the spin-boson dynamics within the hierarchical equations of motion approach, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.232, 3209–3217 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.