pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07599 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Magnetically Responsive Microprintable Soft Nanocomposites with Tunable Nanoparticle Loading

Rachel M. Sun , Andrew Y. Chen , Yiming Ji , Eric M. Stewart , Daryl W. Yee , Carlos M. Portela This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords two-photon polymerizationsoft nanocompositesmagnetic nanoparticles3D printingtunable nanoparticle loadingsoft roboticsmicroscale magnetic actuationiron oxide
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modulating two-photon dose during 3D printing controls local iron oxide nanoparticle content in soft polymer matrices for magnetic actuation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a fabrication process that combines two-photon polymerization with iron oxide nanoparticle coprecipitation. By locally changing the light dose, the amount and placement of nanoparticles inside the printed soft material can be adjusted in three dimensions. This produces microscale parts that exhibit different magnetic responses in different regions while maintaining the ability to undergo large elastic deformations. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach solves scattering and loading problems that have kept microscale magnetically responsive devices rare. Concrete demonstrations include a gripper that closes under magnetic fields and a bistable sensor that registers states.

Core claim

We combine two-photon polymerization with iron oxide nanoparticle coprecipitation to fabricate 3D-printed microscale nanocomposites with spatially tunable nanoparticle distribution. We control nanoparticle content by locally modulating the two-photon dose, imbuing parts with varied magnetic functionality and achieving millimeter-scale elastic deformations, demonstrated by a soft robotic gripper and a bistable bit register and sensor.

What carries the argument

Local modulation of the two-photon polymerization dose, which controls the rate and location of iron oxide nanoparticle coprecipitation inside the soft matrix to achieve spatial tuning of magnetic response.

If this is right

  • Single printed parts can contain adjacent regions with distinct magnetic strengths and stiffnesses.
  • Millimeter-scale elastic deformations become achievable in soft-magnetic microdevices without impractically high uniform particle loadings.
  • Soft robotic grippers and bistable registers can be fabricated at microscales with integrated actuation and sensing.
  • Mechanical and magnetic properties can be tuned independently within the same manufacturing step.
  • The method supports creation of microscale metamaterials whose local responses vary by design.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dose-modulation principle could be tested with other functional nanoparticles to create multi-responsive composites.
  • Scaling the approach to hybrid micro-macro prints might connect small magnetic actuators to larger mechanical systems.
  • Medical micro-robots could use the spatial control to place high-loading magnetic regions only where needed for efficient remote actuation.
  • Measuring the maximum particle loading before mechanical failure would define the practical design space for new devices.

Load-bearing premise

Varying the two-photon dose precisely controls how many nanoparticles form and where they sit without scattering that ruins print resolution or weakens the material.

What would settle it

Printed test structures with different intended doses show identical magnetic susceptibility and identical deformation under the same applied field, or high-dose regions exhibit resolution loss from scattering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.07599 by Andrew Y. Chen, Carlos M. Portela, Daryl W. Yee, Eric M. Stewart, Rachel M. Sun, Yiming Ji.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fabricating magnetically responsive nanoparticle composites. (A) The fabrication process involves printing a hydrogel via two-photon polymerization (TPP), infus￾ing with iron ions in an iron salt bath, then immersing the sample in ammonium hydroxide to coprecipitate IONPs within them. (B) Images of printed samples as a function of laser power (or dose) after each stage of the fabrication process. Scale bar… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) characterization of the magnetic composite. (A) Scanning electron microscope images (left) and corresponding EDS area scans of iron (Fe) counts (right) as a function of the dynamic range. (B) EDS line scans of cross-sections of an IONP composite block printed at (i) 16%, (ii) 36%, (iii) 64%, and (iv) 100% dynamic range. Normalized distance x/r represents the line … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Magnetic and mechanical properties of the IONP composite material. (A) Magnetization curves of monolithic 5 × 5 × 0.5 mm3 blocks printed with different laser powers: 2% (light pink), 18%, 51%, and 100% (red) dynamic range. Shaded regions indicate one standard deviation from the mean (solid lines) across three sample replicates. (B) Stiffness (red triangles) and effective yield strength (black circles) are … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Functional microstructures via IONP nanocomposite. (A) Schematic (i) and experimental demonstration (ii)-(iii) of the deflection of an array of spheres printed with constant 2% dynamic range, attached to cylinders printed at 18% dynamic range and a base printed at 51% dynamic range. Images show the array from a side view before and after a permanent magnet is placed near enough to deflect the array. Scale … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Functional microstructures via IONP nanocomposite. (A) Bistable structure toggled between stable states using magnetic actuation. Simulated results of strain energy versus rigid body displacement (rigid body in bright red) show a bistable energy landscape with two energy minima. (B) Experimental microscope images show a bistable “bit” switching back and forth between its multiple stable states. All scale b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Non-volatile information in a magnetically bistable bit. (A) Printing the bistable bit at different percentages of the dynamic range enables different states of activa￾tion (i.e., switching to the “1” state) as a function of field gradient strength by using different magnets. (i-iii) The bit at 16% dynamic range activates for all tested field gradients, demon￾strating remotely-actuated snap-through. (iv-vi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic remote actuation of soft materials is attractive for applications such as transforming materials and medical robots. However, due to manufacturing limitations, microscale magnetoactive devices are scarce -- light-based additive manufacturing methods, despite achieving microscale resolution, struggle with particle-induced light scattering. Moreover, large hard-magnetic microparticles restrict ultimate feature sizes, and deformation of soft-magnetic nanoparticle composites requires impractically high loading and field gradients. Among successfully fabricated microscale soft-magnetic composites, limited control over particle loading, distribution, and matrix-phase stiffness has hindered their functionality. Here, we combine two-photon polymerization with iron oxide nanoparticle coprecipitation to fabricate 3D-printed microscale nanocomposites with spatially tunable nanoparticle distribution. We control nanoparticle content by locally modulating the two-photon dose, imbuing parts with varied magnetic functionality and achieving millimeter-scale elastic deformations, demonstrated by a soft robotic gripper and a bistable bit register and sensor. Our approach enables precise control of mechanical and magnetic properties towards microscale metamaterial and robotics applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fabrication approach combining two-photon polymerization with iron oxide nanoparticle coprecipitation to produce microscale 3D-printed soft nanocomposites. Nanoparticle content is controlled by locally varying the two-photon dose to achieve spatially tunable magnetic functionality, enabling millimeter-scale elastic deformations demonstrated in a soft robotic gripper and a bistable bit register/sensor for potential microscale metamaterial and robotics uses.

Significance. If the dose-dependent nanoparticle loading is quantitatively validated, the method would offer a useful route to microscale magnetoactive soft devices by mitigating particle scattering and enabling tunable loading without high fields or large particles. The experimental demonstrations of large deformations provide initial functional evidence, though the absence of supporting metrics limits assessment of the advance relative to prior soft-magnetic composites.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract/Results] Abstract and results: the claim that nanoparticle content is controlled by locally modulating the two-photon dose lacks direct quantitative support. No local Fe mapping (EDX line scans or equivalent), magnetometry on dose-gradient samples, or loading measurements are reported to confirm spatial variation in particle incorporation rather than stiffness gradients from crosslinking density alone.
  2. [Demonstrations] Device demonstrations: the gripper and bistable sensor examples provide no quantitative data such as displacement vs. field curves, error bars, repeatability statistics, or control comparisons (e.g., uniform-dose samples). This leaves the contribution of magnetic tunability versus mechanical gradients unverified for the reported millimeter-scale deformations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that deformation 'requires impractically high loading' would benefit from a specific numerical reference to typical nanoparticle loadings in the literature for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the quantitative aspects of our fabrication approach. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract/Results] Abstract and results: the claim that nanoparticle content is controlled by locally modulating the two-photon dose lacks direct quantitative support. No local Fe mapping (EDX line scans or equivalent), magnetometry on dose-gradient samples, or loading measurements are reported to confirm spatial variation in particle incorporation rather than stiffness gradients from crosslinking density alone.

    Authors: We agree that direct local quantification of Fe content would provide stronger confirmation of dose-dependent nanoparticle incorporation. The current manuscript presents indirect evidence through the correlation between two-photon dose, observed magnetic actuation, and mechanical response. To address this concern, we will add EDX line scans across dose-gradient regions and magnetometry measurements on samples fabricated at different doses in the revised version. These additions will help separate particle-loading effects from crosslinking-density variations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Demonstrations] Device demonstrations: the gripper and bistable sensor examples provide no quantitative data such as displacement vs. field curves, error bars, repeatability statistics, or control comparisons (e.g., uniform-dose samples). This leaves the contribution of magnetic tunability versus mechanical gradients unverified for the reported millimeter-scale deformations.

    Authors: We recognize that the device examples would benefit from quantitative metrics to isolate the role of spatially tuned magnetic loading. The demonstrations illustrate the capability for large elastic deformations under moderate fields. In the revision we will include displacement-versus-field curves with error bars, repeatability data over multiple cycles, and direct comparisons to uniform-dose control samples to better substantiate the contribution of the tunable nanoparticle distribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fabrication paper with no derivations or self-referential modeling

full rationale

This is a purely experimental materials fabrication and demonstration paper. The central claims rest on physical outcomes of two-photon polymerization combined with post-print coprecipitation of iron oxide nanoparticles, with spatial control asserted via dose modulation. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical derivations appear in the manuscript. Results are shown through device demonstrations (gripper, bistable register) rather than any chain that reduces to self-defined inputs or self-citations. The reader's assessment of score 1.0 aligns with the absence of any load-bearing circular steps of the enumerated kinds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on established domain techniques for high-resolution printing and nanoparticle synthesis without introducing new physical entities or free parameters; the contribution is the integrated process control rather than new foundational assumptions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Two-photon polymerization achieves microscale feature resolution in polymerizable resins.
    Invoked implicitly as the base printing method capable of overcoming scattering issues when combined with controlled nanoparticle formation.
  • domain assumption Iron oxide nanoparticles can be formed via coprecipitation within the printed polymer matrix in a spatially controllable manner.
    Central to achieving tunable loading by dose modulation; treated as feasible based on prior nanoparticle chemistry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1583 out tokens · 44418 ms · 2026-05-18T08:32:58.255267+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ji, Q., Moughames, J., Chen, X., Fang, G., Huaroto, J.J., Laude, V., Mart´ ınez, J.A.I., Ulliac, G., Cl´ evy, C., Lutz, P. et al. (2021). 4d thermomechanical metamaterials for soft microrobotics. Communications Materials2, 93. 23

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Haghpanah, B., Salari-Sharif, L., Pourrajab, P., Hopkins, J., and Valdevit, L. (2016). Multistable shape-reconfigurable architected materials. Adv. Mater28, 7915–7920

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Cui, H., Yao, D., Hensleigh, R., Lu, H., Calderon, A., Xu, Z., Davaria, S., Wang, Z., Mercier, P., Tarazaga, P. et al. (2022). Design and printing of proprioceptive three- dimensional architected robotic metamaterials. Science376, 1287–1293

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Jackson, J.A., Messner, M.C., Dudukovic, N.A., Smith, W.L., Bekker, L., Moran, B., Golobic, A.M., Pascall, A.J., Duoss, E.B., Loh, K.J. et al. (2018). Field responsive mechanical metamaterials. Science advances4, eaau6419

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Chen, A.Y., Pegg, E., Chen, A., Jin, Z., and Gu, G.X. (2021). 4d printing of electroactive materials. Advanced Intelligent Systems3. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aisy. 202100019. doi:10.1002/aisy.202100019

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy 2021

  6. [6]

    Dong, Y., Wang, L., Xia, N., Yang, Z., Zhang, C., Pan, C., Jin, D., Zhang, J., Majidi, C., and Zhang, L. (2022). Untethered small-scale magnetic soft robot with programmable magnetization and integrated multifunctional modules. Science advances8, eabn8932

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Smart, C.L., Pearson, T.G., Liang, Z., Lim, M.X., Abdelrahman, M.I., Monticone, F., Cohen, I., and McEuen, P.L. (2024). Magnetically programmed diffractive robotics. Science386, 1031–1037

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Ze, Q., Kuang, X., Wu, S., Wong, J., Montgomery, S.M., Zhang, R., Kovitz, J.M., Yang, F., Qi, H.J., and Zhao, R. (2020). Magnetic shape memory polymers with integrated multifunctional shape manipulation. Advanced materials32, 1906657

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Lee, H., Jang, Y., Choe, J.K., Lee, S., Song, H., Lee, J.P., Lone, N., and Kim, J. (2020). 3d-printed programmable tensegrity for soft robotics. Science Robotics5, eaay9024

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Carpenter, J.A., Eberle, T.B., Schuerle, S., Rafsanjani, A., and Studart, A.R. (2021). Facile manufacturing route for magneto-responsive soft actuators. Advanced Intelligent Systems3, 2000283

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Kim, Y., Parada, G.A., Liu, S., and Zhao, X. (2019). Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Science robotics4, eaax7329

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Cabanach, P., Pena-Francesch, A., Sheehan, D., Bozuyuk, U., Yasa, O., Borros, S., and Sitti, M. (2020). Zwitterionic 3d-printed non-immunogenic stealth microrobots. Advanced Materials32, 2003013

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Ni, K., Peng, Q., Gao, E., Wang, K., Shao, Q., Huang, H., Xue, L., and Wang, Z. (2021). Core–shell magnetic micropillars for reprogrammable actuation. ACS nano15, 4747–4758

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Liu, W.C., Chou, V.H.Y., Behera, R.P., and Le Ferrand, H. (2022). Magnetically as- sisted drop-on-demand 3d printing of microstructured multimaterial composites. Nature communications13, 5015

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Cui, J., Huang, T.Y., Luo, Z., Testa, P., Gu, H., Chen, X.Z., Nelson, B.J., and Heyder- man, L.J. (2019). Nanomagnetic encoding of shape-morphing micromachines. Nature 575, 164–168. 24

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Chen, C., Ding, S., and Wang, J. (2024). Materials consideration for the de- sign, fabrication and operation of microscale robots. Nature Reviews Materials9, 159–172. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00641-2. doi:10.1038/ s41578-023-00641-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00641-2 2024

  17. [17]

    Kim, Y., Yuk, H., Zhao, R., Chester, S.A., and Zhao, X. (2018). Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming soft materials. Nature558, 274–279

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Wu, S., Eichenberger, J., Dai, J., Chang, Y., Ghalichechian, N., and Zhao, R.R. (2022). Magnetically actuated reconfigurable metamaterials as conformal electromagnetic fil- ters. Advanced Intelligent Systems4, 2200106

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Zhang, Q., Cherkasov, A.V., Arora, N., Hu, G., and Rudykh, S. (2023). Magnetic field- induced asymmetric mechanical metamaterials. Extreme Mechanics Letters59, 101957

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Sim, J., Wu, S., Hwang, S., Lu, L., and Zhao, R.R. (2025). Selective actuation en- abled multifunctional magneto-mechanical metamaterial for programming elastic wave propagation. Advanced Functional Materials35, 2422325

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Song, H., Lee, H., Lee, J., Choe, J.K., Lee, S., Yi, J.Y., Park, S., Yoo, J.W., Kwon, M.S., and Kim, J. (2020). Reprogrammable ferromagnetic domains for reconfigurable soft magnetic actuators. Nano Letters20, 5185–5192

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Zhang, J., Ren, Z., Hu, W., Soon, R.H., Yasa, I.C., Liu, Z., and Sitti, M. (2021). Voxelated three-dimensional miniature magnetic soft machines via multimaterial het- erogeneous assembly. Science robotics6, eabf0112

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Sun, B., Jia, R., Yang, H., Chen, X., Tan, K., Deng, Q., and Tang, J. (2022). Magnetic arthropod millirobots fabricated by 3d-printed hydrogels. Advanced Intelligent Systems 4, 2100139

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Ze, Q., Wu, S., Dai, J., Leanza, S., Ikeda, G., Yang, P.C., Iaccarino, G., and Zhao, R.R. (2022). Spinning-enabled wireless amphibious origami millirobot. Nature communica- tions13, 3118

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Ma, C., Wu, S., Ze, Q., Kuang, X., Zhang, R., Qi, H.J., and Zhao, R. (2020). Magnetic multimaterial printing for multimodal shape transformation with tunable properties and shiftable mechanical behaviors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces13, 12639–12648

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Wang, T., Ugurlu, H., Yan, Y., Li, M., Li, M., Wild, A.M., Yildiz, E., Schneider, M., Sheehan, D., Hu, W. et al. (2022). Adaptive wireless millirobotic locomotion into distal vasculature. Nature communications13, 4465

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Crespo-Miguel, J., Lucarini, S., Garzon-Hernandez, S., Arias, A., Mart´ ınez-Pa˜ neda, E., and Garcia-Gonzalez, D. (2025). In-silico platform for the multifunctional design of 3d printed conductive components. Nature Communications16. URL:http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/s41467-025-56707-y. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56707-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56707-y 2025

  28. [28]

    Alapan, Y., Karacakol, A.C., Guzelhan, S.N., Isik, I., and Sitti, M. (). Reprogrammable shape morphing of magnetic soft machines. Science Advances6, eabc6414. URL:https: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc6414. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc6414. 25

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc6414

  29. [29]

    Perez-Garcia, C., Zaera, R., Aranda-Ruiz, J., Bordiga, G., Risso, G., Lopez-Donaire, M.L., Bertoldi, K., and Garcia-Gonzalez, D. (2025). Reprogrammable mechanical meta- materials via passive and active magnetic interactions. Advanced Materials37. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.202412353. doi:10.1002/adma.202412353

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202412353 2025

  30. [30]

    Moreno-Mateos, M.A., Lopez-Donaire, M.L., Hossain, M., and Garcia-Gonzalez, D. (2022). Effects of soft and hard magnetic particles on the mechanical performance of ultra-soft magnetorheological elastomers. Smart Materials and Structures31, 065018. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac6bd3. doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ ac6bd3

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ac6bd3 2022

  31. [31]

    Wu, P., Yu, T., and Chen, M. (2023). Magnetically-assisted digital light process- ing 4d printing of flexible anisotropic soft-magnetic composites. Virtual and Physi- cal Prototyping18. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.2244924. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2244924

    work page doi:10.1080/17452759.2023.2244924 2023

  32. [32]

    Kim, Y., and Zhao, X. (2022). Magnetic soft materials and robots. Chemical reviews 122, 5317–5364

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Giltinan, J., Sridhar, V., Bozuyuk, U., Sheehan, D., and Sitti, M. (2021). 3d micro- printing of iron platinum nanoparticle-based magnetic mobile microrobots. Advanced Intelligent Systems3, 2000204

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Ceylan, H., Yasa, I.C., Yasa, O., Tabak, A.F., Giltinan, J., and Sitti, M. (2018). 3d-printed biodegradable microswimmer for drug delivery and targeted cell labeling. BioRxiv pp. 379024

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Kim, S., Lee, S., Lee, J., Nelson, B.J., Zhang, L., and Choi, H. (2016). Fabrication and manipulation of ciliary microrobots with non-reciprocal magnetic actuation. Scientific reports6, 30713

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Li, R., Jiang, M., Liu, B., Jiang, S., Chen, C., Liang, M., Qu, L., Wang, C., Zhao, G., Hu, Y., Wu, D., Chu, J., and Li, J. (2024). High-performance magnetic metal microrobot prepared by a two-photon polymerization and sintering method. Lab on a Chip24, 832–842. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D3LC01084H. doi:10.1039/d3lc01084h

    work page doi:10.1039/d3lc01084h 2024

  37. [37]

    Rothermel, F., Thiele, S., Jung, C., Krapf, A., Ilse, S.E., Merle, B., Giessen, H., and Herkommer, A.M. (2024). Fabrication and characterization of a magnetic 3d-printed mi- croactuator. Advanced Materials Technologies9. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ admt.202302196. doi:10.1002/admt.202302196

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.202302196 2024

  38. [38]

    Mukherjee, D., Bodelot, L., and Danas, K. (2020). Microstructurally-guided explicit continuum models for isotropic magnetorheological elastomers with iron particles. In- ternational Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics120, 103380. URL:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103380. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103380

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103380 2020

  39. [39]

    Stewart, E.M., and Anand, L. (2025). Magnetostriction of soft-magnetorheological elas- tomers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids194, 105934

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Han, Y., Hong, W., and Faidley, L.E. (2013). Field-stiffening effect of magneto- rheological elastomers. International Journal of Solids and Structures50, 2281–2288. 26

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Danas, K., Kankanala, S., and Triantafyllidis, N. (2012). Experiments and modeling of iron-particle-filled magnetorheological elastomers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids60, 120–138. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.006. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.006 2012

  42. [42]

    Cestarollo, L., Smolenski, S., and El-Ghazaly, A. (2022). Nanoparticle-based magne- torheological elastomers with enhanced mechanical deflection for haptic displays. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces14, 19002–19011

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Bodelot, L., Voropaieff, J.P., and P¨ ossinger, T. (2017). Experimental investigation of the coupled magneto-mechanical response in magnetorheological elastomers. Experimental Mechanics58, 207–221. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0334-7. doi: 10.1007/s11340-017-0334-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11340-017-0334-7 2017

  44. [44]

    Moreno, M., Gonzalez-Rico, J., Lopez-Donaire, M., Arias, A., and Garcia-Gonzalez, D. (2021). New experimental insights into magneto-mechanical rate dependences of magne- torheological elastomers. Composites Part B: Engineering224, 109148. URL:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109148. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb. 2021.109148

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109148 2021

  45. [45]

    Gonzalez-Saiz, E., Lopez-Donaire, M.L., Guti´ errez, L., Danas, K., and Garcia-Gonzalez, D. (2025). Magnetic-driven viscous mechanisms in ultra-soft magnetorheological elas- tomers offer history-dependent actuation with reprogrammability options. Advanced Science. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202506790. doi:10.1002/advs. 202506790

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202506790 2025

  46. [46]

    Geid, N., Husari, A., Galli, E., Leffler, L., Tomakidi, P., and R¨ uhe, J. (2024). A gym for cells—direct laser writing of magnetic multilayered micro actuators for mechanical stimulation of cells. Advanced Functional Materials pp. 2419614

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Peters, C., Ergeneman, O., Garc´ ıa, P.D.W., M¨ uller, M., Pan´ e, S., Nelson, B.J., and Hierold, C. (2014). Superparamagnetic twist-type actuators with shape-independent magnetic properties and surface functionalization for advanced biomedical applications. Advanced Functional Materials24, 5269–5276

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Pierre, R., McCue, C., Moreno, K., and Bergbreiter, S

    Soreni-Harari, M., St. Pierre, R., McCue, C., Moreno, K., and Bergbreiter, S. (2020). Multimaterial 3d printing for microrobotic mechanisms. Soft robotics7, 59–67

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Xing, L., Cai, Y., Zhang, Y., Mozel, K., Tang, Z., Tang, T., Mottini, V., Nigam, S., Smith, B.R., Lee, I.Y. et al. (2025). Trimag microrobots: 3d-printed microrobots for magnetic actuation, imaging, and hyperthermia. Advanced Materials pp. e19708

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Ji, Y., Su, E., and Yee, D.W. (2025). Volumetric additive manufacturing of composites via hydrogel infusion. ACS Materials Letters7, 2850–2857. URL:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00407. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00407

    work page doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00407 2025

  51. [51]

    Bauer, J., Guell Izard, A., Zhang, Y., Baldacchini, T., and Valdevit, L. (2019). Pro- grammable mechanical properties of two-photon polymerized materials: From nanowires to bulk. Advanced Materials Technologies4. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ admt.201900146. doi:10.1002/admt.201900146

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.201900146 2019

  52. [52]

    Eren, T.N., Liang, J., Schneider, J.L.G., Wegener, M., Bauer, J., Ehrmann, K., Feist, F., and Barner-Kowollik, C. (2025). Soft and stiff 3d microstructures by step- growth photopolymerization using a single photoresin and multi-photon laser printing. 27 Advanced Functional Materials. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202502876. doi:10.1002/adfm.202502876

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202502876 2025

  53. [53]

    Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., and Muller, R.N. (2008). Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chemical Reviews108, 2064–2110. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr068445e. doi:10.1021/cr068445e

    work page doi:10.1021/cr068445e 2008

  54. [54]

    Jiang, L.J., Zhou, Y.S., Xiong, W., Gao, Y., Huang, X., Jiang, L., Baldacchini, T., Silvain, J.F., and Lu, Y.F. (2014). Two-photon polymerization: investigation of chemical and mechanical properties of resins using raman microspectroscopy. Optics Letters 39, 3034. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003034. doi:10.1364/ol.39. 003034

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.39.003034 2014

  55. [55]

    Ceylan, H., Dogan, N.O., Yasa, I.C., Musaoglu, M.N., Kulali, Z.U., and Sitti, M. (2021). 3d printed personalized magnetic micromachines from patient blood–derived biomate- rials. Science advances7, eabh0273

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Harding, J.W., and Sneddon, I.N. (1945). The elastic stresses produced by the inden- tation of the plane surface of a semi-infinite elastic solid by a rigid punch. Mathe- matical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society41, 16–26. URL:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100022325. doi:10.1017/s0305004100022325. 28

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100022325 1945