pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07820 · v2 · pith:7OCD4JZ3new · submitted 2025-10-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Product testing with single-copy measurements

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords productmeasurementstestingsingle-copyboundlowerprovesample
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the sample complexity of two variants of product testing when restricted to single-copy measurements. In particular, we consider both bipartite product testing (i.e., does there exist at least one non-trivial cut across which the state is product) and multipartite product testing (i.e., is the state fully product across every cut). For the first variant, we prove an exponential lower bound on the sample complexity of any algorithm for this task which utilizes only single-copy measurements. When comparing this with known efficient algorithms that utilize multi-copy measurements, this establishes an exponential separation for this and several related entanglement learning tasks. For the second variant, we prove another sample lower bound that establishes a separation between single- and multi-copy strategies. To obtain our results, we prove a crucial technical lemma that gives a lower bound on the overlap between tensor products of permutation operators acting on subsystems of states that themselves carry a tensor structure. Finally, we provide an algorithm for multipartite product testing using only single-copy, local measurements, and we highlight several interesting open questions arising from this work.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory

    quant-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Stabilizer testing requires Θ(n-k) copies and non-adaptive learning Θ(n²/k) copies with k-qubit memory, removing the testing-learning separation.