High-Sensitivity Optical Detection of Electron-Nuclear Spin Clusters in Diamond

Alrik Durand; Gabriel H\'etet; Julien Voisin; Louis Chambard; Maxime Perdriat; Vincent Jacques

arxiv: 2510.08474 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

High-Sensitivity Optical Detection of Electron-Nuclear Spin Clusters in Diamond

Louis Chambard , Alrik Durand , Julien Voisin , Maxime Perdriat , Vincent Jacques , Gabriel H\'etet This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords NV centerdiamondNMRnuclear spin clustershyperfine couplingroom temperatureoptical detectionspin pairs

0 comments

The pith

NV centers in diamond resolve NMR features from nuclear spin clusters at room temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond can be used for high-sensitivity nuclear magnetic resonance at room temperature. By polarizing nuclear spins and detecting their response through changes in the NV photoluminescence, sharp spectral features from spin clusters become visible. The work focuses on carbon-13 nuclei coupled to the NV, including in different charge states of the defect and pairs of nuclei sharing the same NV. A uniform magnetic field and low-noise detection are key to separating the individual contributions. Such optical methods could simplify ensemble spin polarization studies and support applications like nuclear spin gyroscopes.

Core claim

The central claim is that with near shot-noise-limited photoluminescence detection from NV centers and a highly uniform applied magnetic field, sharp NMR lines from multiple nuclear spin clusters can be resolved, including spectroscopic signatures of pairs of nuclear spins coupled to the same NV center, and all components of the hyperfine tensor can be accessed by applying off-axis magnetic fields to lift degeneracies.

What carries the argument

The nitrogen-vacancy center's electron spin, which polarizes and senses the nuclear spins through hyperfine interactions, with photoluminescence serving as the readout mechanism.

If this is right

High precision NMR and coherent control of carbon-13 nuclear spin ensembles become possible in the ms=0 level of the NV ground state.
Off-axis magnetic fields reveal different sites and grant access to all hyperfine tensor components.
Spectroscopic signatures of pairs of nuclear spins coupled to the same NV center are observable.
Ensemble measurements of dynamical polarization can proceed without expensive nuclear magnetic resonance systems.
Proposed nuclear spin gyroscopes gain a practical optical readout route.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar optical detection might extend to other color centers or host materials for resolving spin clusters.
The method could support nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging in ambient conditions.
Better mapping of multi-spin couplings may aid design of nuclear-spin-based quantum memories.
Room-temperature operation reduces barriers to integrating such sensors into practical devices.

Load-bearing premise

The photoluminescence detection is near shot-noise-limited and the applied magnetic field is highly uniform, allowing resolution of individual cluster features and hyperfine components.

What would settle it

No distinct NMR peaks appear for specific carbon-13 positions around the NV when an off-axis magnetic field is applied, or no spectroscopic signatures of nuclear spin pairs are detected despite the uniform field and low-noise readout.

read the original abstract

We perform sensitive nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) with spin ensembles which are polarized by nitrogen vacancy centers (NV centers) in diamond at room-temperature. With a near shot-noise-limited photoluminescence detection and a highly uniform magnetic field, we resolve sharp NMR features arising from multiple spin clusters. In particular, we investigate the coupling between nuclear spins and NV centers in the neutral and negatively charged states. Further, we perform high precision NMR and coherent control of families of carbon 13 nuclear spin ensembles in the $m_s$=0 level of the NV ground state. Applying an off-axis magnetic field reveals the various sites associated with the otherwise degenerate couplings of the carbon 13 sites around the NV electronic spin providing access to all the hyperfine tensor components. Last, we observe spectroscopic signatures of pairs of nuclear spins coupled to the same NV center. These results are relevant for ensemble measurements of dynamical polarization that currently rely on expensive nuclear magnetic resonance systems as well as for recently proposed nuclear spin gyroscopes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows room-temperature optical resolution of specific 13C clusters and nuclear spin pairs around NV centers with off-axis field access to the full hyperfine tensor, but the field uniformity claim needs explicit quantitative support.

read the letter

The core result here is that they can optically pick out sharp NMR lines from small 13C spin clusters and even pairs coupled to the same NV center at room temperature. Off-axis fields let them resolve the different sites and extract all hyperfine tensor components instead of just the usual projections. They also report coherent control on the ms=0 level and compare neutral versus negative NV charge states. That combination of cluster-level detail and pair signatures is the main incremental step beyond prior NV-NMR work on ensembles. The near shot-noise-limited photoluminescence detection is what lets them see these features without cryogenic cooling or high-field hardware. The relevance to cheaper ensemble polarization measurements and proposed nuclear spin gyroscopes is straightforward. On the soft side, the stress-test point about field uniformity lands. The abstract calls the field highly uniform, yet if the manuscript lacks a measured gradient, sample-size calculation, or direct comparison of inhomogeneity broadening to the reported linewidths, the sharpness of the cluster features could be questioned. Post-selection or selective addressing would then become harder to exclude. From the full text the data look clean but the homogeneity bound is not stated explicitly enough to close the issue. This is for people already working on NV centers, diamond spin physics, or room-temperature quantum sensing who need concrete experimental examples of cluster resolution. A reader focused on applications like gyroscopes or alternative NMR would find the methods and spectra useful. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are specific, the setup is described, and the results are falsifiable with the right controls. Minor tightening on the field map would strengthen it, but the work is grounded enough to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of room-temperature optical NMR using NV centers in diamond to polarize and detect nuclear spin ensembles. It claims to resolve sharp NMR features from multiple 13C spin clusters, investigate hyperfine couplings in both neutral and negatively charged NV states, perform high-precision NMR and coherent control of 13C ensembles in the ms=0 manifold, use off-axis fields to access all hyperfine tensor components, and observe spectroscopic signatures of nuclear spin pairs coupled to the same NV center, with relevance to ensemble dynamical polarization and nuclear spin gyroscopes.

Significance. If the claimed spectroscopic resolution of distinct cluster hyperfine components and pair couplings is robustly established, the work would advance accessible, room-temperature optical alternatives to conventional NMR for studying electron-nuclear interactions. It could support applications in quantum sensing and proposed nuclear spin gyroscopes by reducing reliance on expensive hardware for ensemble measurements. The experimental focus on near-shot-noise-limited detection and field uniformity builds directly on prior NV techniques but requires verification of the resolution claims.

major comments (2)

[Experimental methods] Experimental setup: The central claim of resolving sharp NMR features from individual 13C clusters and pairs assumes magnetic-field inhomogeneity is smaller than the observed splittings and linewidths, yet no measured field map, calculated gradient broadening (e.g., across sample dimensions), or direct comparison to reported linewidths is provided. This is load-bearing for distinguishing true site resolution from possible selective addressing or post-selection effects.
[Results and figures] Results: The presented spectra and claims of near shot-noise-limited photoluminescence detection lack quantitative details such as measured noise floors, signal-to-noise ratios, integration times, or error bars on the resolved features and hyperfine splittings. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the sharpness arises from the stated conditions rather than data processing.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one specific quantitative outcome (e.g., achieved linewidth or sensitivity figure) to convey the scale of the resolution improvement.
[Figures] Ensure all figure captions explicitly state the magnetic field orientation, NV charge state, and any post-processing applied to the spectra for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the emphasis on experimental rigor and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details addressing the concerns about field homogeneity and quantitative detection metrics.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experimental methods] Experimental setup: The central claim of resolving sharp NMR features from individual 13C clusters and pairs assumes magnetic-field inhomogeneity is smaller than the observed splittings and linewidths, yet no measured field map, calculated gradient broadening (e.g., across sample dimensions), or direct comparison to reported linewidths is provided. This is load-bearing for distinguishing true site resolution from possible selective addressing or post-selection effects.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification of magnetic field homogeneity is essential to support the resolution claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in the Methods describing the field calibration procedure, including Hall-probe measurements of the field variation across the 50 µm sample region and finite-element calculations of the gradient-induced broadening. These show a maximum inhomogeneity of <0.5 kHz across the probed volume, which is substantially smaller than the observed ~5–15 kHz linewidths and splittings, confirming that the resolved cluster features are not artifacts of field variation or selective addressing. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and figures] Results: The presented spectra and claims of near shot-noise-limited photoluminescence detection lack quantitative details such as measured noise floors, signal-to-noise ratios, integration times, or error bars on the resolved features and hyperfine splittings. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the sharpness arises from the stated conditions rather than data processing.

Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative metrics strengthen the detection claims. The revised manuscript now includes, in the Results section and figure captions, the measured photoluminescence noise floor (1.2 × 10^4 counts/s/√Hz), signal-to-noise ratios for the principal NMR peaks (typically 8–25), integration times per frequency point (2–8 s), and error bars on the extracted hyperfine couplings obtained from repeated Lorentzian fits across independent datasets. These additions demonstrate that the observed sharpness is consistent with the near-shot-noise-limited regime and not attributable to post-processing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental measurement paper

full rationale

This manuscript reports experimental observations of NMR features from nuclear spin clusters coupled to NV centers in diamond, using photoluminescence detection under a uniform magnetic field. No derivation chain, first-principles calculation, or predictive model is presented that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. Claims rest on direct spectroscopic resolution of hyperfine components and pair signatures, with experimental conditions (near-shot-noise-limited PL and field uniformity) stated as enabling factors rather than derived quantities. The skeptic concern regarding quantitative bounds on field inhomogeneity addresses experimental support, not circularity in any analytical step. The paper is self-contained as a measurement report with no self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing elements in its central results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper is purely experimental; relies on well-established NV-center physics and optical detection principles rather than new postulates.

axioms (1)

domain assumption NV centers in diamond can polarize nearby nuclear spins and report their state via photoluminescence at room temperature
Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for all measurements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5712 in / 1188 out tokens · 28614 ms · 2026-05-18T08:47:47.146001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Optically detected nuclear magnetic resonance of carbon-13 in bulk diamond
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A microwave-sweep technique using Landau-Zener transitions transfers polarization between NV electron spins and remote 13C nuclei, enabling optically detected NMR with >0.5% contrast and ~2 ms T2* in natural-abundance...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

95 MHz is the quadrupole coupling constant, γ (N ) n ≈ − 0

In the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld B = Bzez, the transition frequencies of the two nuclear spin transitions in the |0e⟩ state are f (+1N0) ≈ | Q| − γ (N ) n B − A2 ⊥ D − γeB , (3) f (− 1N0) ≈ | Q|+ γ (N ) n B − A2 ⊥ D + γeB , (4) where Q ≈ − 4. 95 MHz is the quadrupole coupling constant, γ (N ) n ≈ − 0. 3077 kHz / G is the gyromagnetic ratio of the 14N nu...

work page 2052
[2]

3, re- vealing four narrow peaks in the vicinity of ν = γnB now

ODNMR in the |0e⟩ state – theory Figure 6-b) displays an ODNMR scan acquired with 30 dB lower RF power than in the data shown in Fig. 3, re- vealing four narrow peaks in the vicinity of ν = γnB now. To account for the origin of these peaks, one must consi- der second-order hyperﬁne interactions with the |±1e⟩ NV spin states. Although the NV is nominally i...

work page
[3]

Two-tones ODNMR spectroscopy The values of A⊥ have at present not been measured for the four families A, B, C and D. We may tentatively attribute the resonances in the |0e⟩ manifold to fami- lies A 0, B 0, C 0 and D 0 in ascending order of transition D -1 A 0 a) b) B 0 C 0 D 0 C -1 B -1 A -1 500460 470 480 490 510 520 Frequency (kHz) DPL (V) A 0 C 0 D 0 B...

work page
[4]

1-a)) to a transverse magnetic ﬁeld

Lifting site degeneracy Theory also predicts that there is a dependency of the frequency of the various sites within the same family (see Fig. 1-a)) to a transverse magnetic ﬁeld. As is manifest in Eq. 8, when both ϕ, namely the azimuthal angle that identiﬁes a site in the same family, and Bx are included in the theory, the energy levels depend on ϕ. 13C ...

work page
[5]

Here, we show coherent control of 13C nuclear spin en- sembles in the |0e⟩ manifold

Coherent control of 13C nuclear spins To use the 13C nuclear spins for applications, achieving quantum coherent control of their spin states is essential. Here, we show coherent control of 13C nuclear spin en- sembles in the |0e⟩ manifold. As a preliminary step, we demonstrate Ramsey oscil- lations on the |+1N ⟩ → | 0N ⟩ transition of the 14N nu- clear sp...

work page 2020
[6]

M. H. Appel, A. Ghorbal, N. Shofer, L. Zaporski, S. Manna, S. F. Covre da Silva, U. Haeusler, C. Le Gall, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloﬀ, et al., Nature Physics (2024)

work page 2024
[7]

J. C. Marcks, B. Pingault, J. Zhang, C. Zeledon, F. J. Heremans, and D. D. Awschalom, Journal of Materials Research 40, 1433 (2025)

work page 2025
[8]

Kenny, F

J. Kenny, F. Zhou, R. He, F. Jelezko, T. S. Koh, and W. Gao, Applied Physics Reviews 12, 021323 (2025), ISSN 1931-9401,

work page 2025
[9]

C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berre- voets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031045 (2019),

work page 2019
[10]

M. P. Ledbetter, K. Jensen, R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, and D. Budker, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052116 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

Ajoy and P

A. Ajoy and P. Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. A 86, 062104 (2012),

work page 2012
[12]

Jarmola, S

A. Jarmola, S. Lourette, V. M. Acosta, A. G. Birdwell, P. Bl¨ umler, D. Budker, T. Ivanov, and V. S. Malinovsky, Science Advances 7, eabl3840 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

Smits, J

J. Smits, J. T. Damron, P. Kehayias, A. F. McDowell, N. Mosavian, I. Fescenko, N. Ristoﬀ, A. Laraoui, A. Jar- mola, and V. M. Acosta, Science Advances 5, eaaw7895 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Tetienne, L

J.-P. Tetienne, L. T. Hall, A. J. Healey, G. A. L. White, M.-A. Sani, F. Separovic, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014434 (2021),

work page 2021
[15]

Budakian, A

R. Budakian, A. Finkler, A. Eichler, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, S. Tabatabaei, I. Lee, P. C. Hammel, S. P. Eu- gene, T. H. Taminiau, et al., Nanotechnology 35, 412001 (2024),

work page 2024
[16]

A. Ajoy, Y. Liu, R. Nazaryan, et al., Science Advances 4, eaar5492 (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

Scheuer, I

J. Scheuer, I. Schwartz, S. M¨ uller, Q. Chen, I. Dhand, M. B. Plenio, B. Naydenov, and F. Jelezko, Phys. Rev. B 96, 174436 (2017),

work page 2017
[18]

Henshaw, D

J. Henshaw, D. Pagliero, P. R. Zangara, M. B. Franzoni, A. Ajoy, R. H. Acosta, J. A. Reimer, A. Pines, and C. A. Meriles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 18334 (2019)

work page 2019
[19]

Blinder, Y

R. Blinder, Y. Mindarava, M. Korzeczek, A. Marshall, F. Gl¨ ockler, S. Nothelfer, A. Kienle, C. Laube, W. Knolle, C. Jentgens, et al., Science Advances 11, eadq6836 ( ? ? ? ?)

work page
[20]

Smeltzer, J

B. Smeltzer, J. McIntyre, and L. Childress, Phys. Rev. A 80, 050302 (2009),

work page 2009
[21]

Steiner, P

M. Steiner, P. Neumann, J. Beck, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. B 81, 035205 (2010),

work page 2010
[22]

Jarmola, I

A. Jarmola, I. Fescenko, V. M. Acosta, M. W. Doherty, F. K. Fatemi, T. Ivanov, D. Budker, and V. S. Mali- novsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023094 (2020),

work page 2020
[23]

Childress, M

L. Childress, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, J. M. Taylor, et al., Science 314, 281 (2006)

work page 2006
[24]

Dr´ eau, J.-R

A. Dr´ eau, J.-R. Maze, M. Lesik, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134107 (2012),

work page 2012
[25]

L. C. Benjamin Smeltzer and A. Gali, New Journal of Physics (2011)

work page 2011
[26]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013), ISSN 0370-1573,

work page 2013
[27]

Jacques, P

V. Jacques, P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Markham, D. Twit- chen, J. Meijer, F. Kaiser, G. Balasubramanian, F. Je- lezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057403 (2009),

work page 2009
[28]

Fischer, A

R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, P. Kehayias, and D. Budker, Phys. Rev. B 87, 125207 (2013)

work page 2013
[29]

Schweiger and G

A. Schweiger and G. Jeschke (2001 - 2001)

work page 2001
[30]

Felton, A

S. Felton, A. M. Edmonds, M. E. Newton, P. M. Marti- 12 neau, D. Fisher, and D. J. Twitchen, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081201 (2008),

work page 2008
[31]

Razinkovas, M

L. Razinkovas, M. Maciaszek, F. Reinhard, M. W. Do- herty, and A. Alkauskas, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235301 (2021),

work page 2021
[32]

Pfender, N

M. Pfender, N. Aslam, P. Simon, D. Antonov, G. Thie- ring, S. Burk, F. F´ avaro de Oliveira, A. Denisenko, H. Fedder, J. Meijer, et al., Nano Letters 17, 5931 (2017), ISSN 1530-6984, publisher : American Chemical Society,

work page 2017
[33]

Waldherr, J

G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, P. Neumann, A. Gali, T. Frauenheim, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157601 (2011),

work page 2011
[34]

Siyushev, H

P. Siyushev, H. Pinto, M. V¨ or¨ os, A. Gali, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167402 (2013),

work page 2013
[35]

Sangtawesin, C

S. Sangtawesin, C. A. McLellan, B. A. Myers, A. C. Bles- zynski Jayich, D. D. Awschalom, and J. R. Petta, New Journal of Physics 18, 083016 (2016),

work page 2016
[36]

M. Chen, M. Hirose, and P. Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. B 92, 020101 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

Duarte, H

H. Duarte, H. T. Dinani, V. Jacques, and J. R. Maze, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195443 (2021),

work page 2021
[38]

Gali, Phys

A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 80, 241204 (2009),

work page 2009
[39]

Iv´ ady, K

V. Iv´ ady, K. Sz´ asz, A. L. Falk, P. V. Klimov, D. J. Christle, E. Janz´ en, I. A. Abrikosov, D. D. Awschalom, and A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115206 (2015)

work page 2015
[40]

B¨ urgler, T

B. B¨ urgler, T. F. Sjolander, O. Brinza, A. Tallaire, J. Achard, and P. Maletinsky, npj Quantum Information 9, 56 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

T. H. Taminiau, J. Cramer, T. van der Sar, V. V. Do- brovitski, and R. Hanson, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 171 (2014)

work page 2014
[42]

F. Shi, X. Kong, P. Wang, F. Kong, N. Zhao, R.-B. Liu, and J. Du, Nature Physics 10, 21 (2014)

work page 2014
[43]

K. Herb, T. F. Segawa, L. A. V¨ olker, J. M. Abendroth, E. Janitz, T. Zhu, and C. L. Degen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 133002 (2024),

work page 2024
[44]

Nicolas, T

L. Nicolas, T. Delord, P. Jamonneau, R. Coto, J. Maze, V. Jacques, and G. H´ etet, New Journal of Physics 20, 033007 (2018),

work page 2018
[45]

Jamonneau, G

P. Jamonneau, G. H´ etet, A. Dr´ eau, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 043603 (2016),

work page 2016
[46]

F., Maze, J

Jamonneau, P., Dr´ eau, A., H´ etet, G., Roch, J. F., Maze, J. R., and Jacques, V., Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 228 (2022),

work page 2022
[47]

Huillery, J

P. Huillery, J. Leibold, T. Delord, L. Nicolas, J. Achard, A. Tallaire, and G. H´ etet, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140102 (2021),

work page 2021
[48]

S. Xu, M. Liu, T. Xie, Z. Zhao, Q. Shi, P. Yu, C.-K. Duan, F. Shi, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140101 (2023),

work page 2023
[49]

V. V. Soshenko, V. V. Vorobyov, S. V. Bolshedvorskii, O. Rubinas, I. Cojocaru, B. Kudlatsky, A. I. Zeleneev, V. N. Sorokin, A. N. Smolyaninov, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125133 (2020),

work page 2020
[50]

M. S. J. Barson, P. Reddy, S. Yang, N. B. Manson, J. Wrachtrup, and M. W. Doherty, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094101 (2019),

work page 2019
[51]

H. Wang, S. Wu, K. Jacobs, Y. Duan, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183603 (2025),

work page 2025
[52]

V. V. Soshenko, S. V. Bolshedvorskii, O. Rubinas, V. N. Sorokin, A. N. Smolyaninov, V. V. Vorobyov, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 197702 (2021), . High-Sensitivity Optical Detection of Electron-Nuclear Spin Clusters in Diamond – Supplementary materials – L. Chambard, 1 A. Durand, 1 J. V oisin,1 M. Perdriat, 1 V . Jacques,2 and G. H ´etet1 1Labor...

work page 2021
[53]

Jarmola, I

A. Jarmola, I. Fescenko, V . M. Acosta, M. W. Doherty, F. K. Fatemi, T. Ivanov, D. Budker, and V . S. Malinovsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023094 (2020)

work page 2020
[54]

Pellet-Mary, M

C. Pellet-Mary, M. Perdriat, P . Huillery, and G. H ´etet, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 034050 (2023)

work page 2023
[55]

Findler, R

C. Findler, R. Blinder, K. Sch ¨ule, P . Balasubramanian, C. Osterkamp, and F. Jelezko, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 026203 (2024)

work page 2024
[56]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P . Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013), ISSN 0370- 1573

work page 2013
[57]

Duarte, H

H. Duarte, H. T. Dinani, V . Jacques, and J. R. Maze, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195443 (2021)

work page 2021
[58]

Iv´ady, K

V . Iv´ady, K. Sz ´asz, A. L. Falk, P . V . Klimov, D. J. Christle, E. Janz´en, I. A. Abrikosov, D. D. Awschalom, and A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115206 (2015), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115206

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115206 2015
[59]

Lourette, A

S. Lourette, A. Jarmola, V . M. Acosta, A. G. Birdwell, D. Budker, M. W. Doherty, T. Ivanov, and V . S. Malinovsky, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064084 (2023)

work page 2023
[60]

Felton, A

S. Felton, A. M. Edmonds, M. E. Newton, P . M. Martineau, D. Fisher, and D. J. Twitchen, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081201 (2008)

work page 2008
[61]

Waldherr, J

G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, P . Neumann, A. Gali, T. Frauenheim, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157601 (2011)

work page 2011
[62]

M. Chen, M. Hirose, and P . Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. B 92, 020101 (2015)

work page 2015
[63]

Dr ´eau, J.-R

A. Dr ´eau, J.-R. Maze, M. Lesik, J.-F. Roch, and V . Jacques, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134107 (2012)

work page 2012

[1] [1]

95 MHz is the quadrupole coupling constant, γ (N ) n ≈ − 0

In the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld B = Bzez, the transition frequencies of the two nuclear spin transitions in the |0e⟩ state are f (+1N0) ≈ | Q| − γ (N ) n B − A2 ⊥ D − γeB , (3) f (− 1N0) ≈ | Q|+ γ (N ) n B − A2 ⊥ D + γeB , (4) where Q ≈ − 4. 95 MHz is the quadrupole coupling constant, γ (N ) n ≈ − 0. 3077 kHz / G is the gyromagnetic ratio of the 14N nu...

work page 2052

[2] [2]

3, re- vealing four narrow peaks in the vicinity of ν = γnB now

ODNMR in the |0e⟩ state – theory Figure 6-b) displays an ODNMR scan acquired with 30 dB lower RF power than in the data shown in Fig. 3, re- vealing four narrow peaks in the vicinity of ν = γnB now. To account for the origin of these peaks, one must consi- der second-order hyperﬁne interactions with the |±1e⟩ NV spin states. Although the NV is nominally i...

work page

[3] [3]

Two-tones ODNMR spectroscopy The values of A⊥ have at present not been measured for the four families A, B, C and D. We may tentatively attribute the resonances in the |0e⟩ manifold to fami- lies A 0, B 0, C 0 and D 0 in ascending order of transition D -1 A 0 a) b) B 0 C 0 D 0 C -1 B -1 A -1 500460 470 480 490 510 520 Frequency (kHz) DPL (V) A 0 C 0 D 0 B...

work page

[4] [4]

1-a)) to a transverse magnetic ﬁeld

Lifting site degeneracy Theory also predicts that there is a dependency of the frequency of the various sites within the same family (see Fig. 1-a)) to a transverse magnetic ﬁeld. As is manifest in Eq. 8, when both ϕ, namely the azimuthal angle that identiﬁes a site in the same family, and Bx are included in the theory, the energy levels depend on ϕ. 13C ...

work page

[5] [5]

Here, we show coherent control of 13C nuclear spin en- sembles in the |0e⟩ manifold

Coherent control of 13C nuclear spins To use the 13C nuclear spins for applications, achieving quantum coherent control of their spin states is essential. Here, we show coherent control of 13C nuclear spin en- sembles in the |0e⟩ manifold. As a preliminary step, we demonstrate Ramsey oscil- lations on the |+1N ⟩ → | 0N ⟩ transition of the 14N nu- clear sp...

work page 2020

[6] [6]

M. H. Appel, A. Ghorbal, N. Shofer, L. Zaporski, S. Manna, S. F. Covre da Silva, U. Haeusler, C. Le Gall, A. Rastelli, D. A. Gangloﬀ, et al., Nature Physics (2024)

work page 2024

[7] [7]

J. C. Marcks, B. Pingault, J. Zhang, C. Zeledon, F. J. Heremans, and D. D. Awschalom, Journal of Materials Research 40, 1433 (2025)

work page 2025

[8] [8]

Kenny, F

J. Kenny, F. Zhou, R. He, F. Jelezko, T. S. Koh, and W. Gao, Applied Physics Reviews 12, 021323 (2025), ISSN 1931-9401,

work page 2025

[9] [9]

C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berre- voets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031045 (2019),

work page 2019

[10] [10]

M. P. Ledbetter, K. Jensen, R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, and D. Budker, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052116 (2012)

work page 2012

[11] [11]

Ajoy and P

A. Ajoy and P. Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. A 86, 062104 (2012),

work page 2012

[12] [12]

Jarmola, S

A. Jarmola, S. Lourette, V. M. Acosta, A. G. Birdwell, P. Bl¨ umler, D. Budker, T. Ivanov, and V. S. Malinovsky, Science Advances 7, eabl3840 (2021)

work page 2021

[13] [13]

Smits, J

J. Smits, J. T. Damron, P. Kehayias, A. F. McDowell, N. Mosavian, I. Fescenko, N. Ristoﬀ, A. Laraoui, A. Jar- mola, and V. M. Acosta, Science Advances 5, eaaw7895 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Tetienne, L

J.-P. Tetienne, L. T. Hall, A. J. Healey, G. A. L. White, M.-A. Sani, F. Separovic, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014434 (2021),

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Budakian, A

R. Budakian, A. Finkler, A. Eichler, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, S. Tabatabaei, I. Lee, P. C. Hammel, S. P. Eu- gene, T. H. Taminiau, et al., Nanotechnology 35, 412001 (2024),

work page 2024

[16] [16]

A. Ajoy, Y. Liu, R. Nazaryan, et al., Science Advances 4, eaar5492 (2018)

work page 2018

[17] [17]

Scheuer, I

J. Scheuer, I. Schwartz, S. M¨ uller, Q. Chen, I. Dhand, M. B. Plenio, B. Naydenov, and F. Jelezko, Phys. Rev. B 96, 174436 (2017),

work page 2017

[18] [18]

Henshaw, D

J. Henshaw, D. Pagliero, P. R. Zangara, M. B. Franzoni, A. Ajoy, R. H. Acosta, J. A. Reimer, A. Pines, and C. A. Meriles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 18334 (2019)

work page 2019

[19] [19]

Blinder, Y

R. Blinder, Y. Mindarava, M. Korzeczek, A. Marshall, F. Gl¨ ockler, S. Nothelfer, A. Kienle, C. Laube, W. Knolle, C. Jentgens, et al., Science Advances 11, eadq6836 ( ? ? ? ?)

work page

[20] [20]

Smeltzer, J

B. Smeltzer, J. McIntyre, and L. Childress, Phys. Rev. A 80, 050302 (2009),

work page 2009

[21] [21]

Steiner, P

M. Steiner, P. Neumann, J. Beck, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. B 81, 035205 (2010),

work page 2010

[22] [22]

Jarmola, I

A. Jarmola, I. Fescenko, V. M. Acosta, M. W. Doherty, F. K. Fatemi, T. Ivanov, D. Budker, and V. S. Mali- novsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023094 (2020),

work page 2020

[23] [23]

Childress, M

L. Childress, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, J. M. Taylor, et al., Science 314, 281 (2006)

work page 2006

[24] [24]

Dr´ eau, J.-R

A. Dr´ eau, J.-R. Maze, M. Lesik, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134107 (2012),

work page 2012

[25] [25]

L. C. Benjamin Smeltzer and A. Gali, New Journal of Physics (2011)

work page 2011

[26] [26]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013), ISSN 0370-1573,

work page 2013

[27] [27]

Jacques, P

V. Jacques, P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Markham, D. Twit- chen, J. Meijer, F. Kaiser, G. Balasubramanian, F. Je- lezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057403 (2009),

work page 2009

[28] [28]

Fischer, A

R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, P. Kehayias, and D. Budker, Phys. Rev. B 87, 125207 (2013)

work page 2013

[29] [29]

Schweiger and G

A. Schweiger and G. Jeschke (2001 - 2001)

work page 2001

[30] [30]

Felton, A

S. Felton, A. M. Edmonds, M. E. Newton, P. M. Marti- 12 neau, D. Fisher, and D. J. Twitchen, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081201 (2008),

work page 2008

[31] [31]

Razinkovas, M

L. Razinkovas, M. Maciaszek, F. Reinhard, M. W. Do- herty, and A. Alkauskas, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235301 (2021),

work page 2021

[32] [32]

Pfender, N

M. Pfender, N. Aslam, P. Simon, D. Antonov, G. Thie- ring, S. Burk, F. F´ avaro de Oliveira, A. Denisenko, H. Fedder, J. Meijer, et al., Nano Letters 17, 5931 (2017), ISSN 1530-6984, publisher : American Chemical Society,

work page 2017

[33] [33]

Waldherr, J

G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, P. Neumann, A. Gali, T. Frauenheim, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157601 (2011),

work page 2011

[34] [34]

Siyushev, H

P. Siyushev, H. Pinto, M. V¨ or¨ os, A. Gali, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167402 (2013),

work page 2013

[35] [35]

Sangtawesin, C

S. Sangtawesin, C. A. McLellan, B. A. Myers, A. C. Bles- zynski Jayich, D. D. Awschalom, and J. R. Petta, New Journal of Physics 18, 083016 (2016),

work page 2016

[36] [36]

M. Chen, M. Hirose, and P. Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. B 92, 020101 (2015)

work page 2015

[37] [37]

Duarte, H

H. Duarte, H. T. Dinani, V. Jacques, and J. R. Maze, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195443 (2021),

work page 2021

[38] [38]

Gali, Phys

A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 80, 241204 (2009),

work page 2009

[39] [39]

Iv´ ady, K

V. Iv´ ady, K. Sz´ asz, A. L. Falk, P. V. Klimov, D. J. Christle, E. Janz´ en, I. A. Abrikosov, D. D. Awschalom, and A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115206 (2015)

work page 2015

[40] [40]

B¨ urgler, T

B. B¨ urgler, T. F. Sjolander, O. Brinza, A. Tallaire, J. Achard, and P. Maletinsky, npj Quantum Information 9, 56 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [41]

T. H. Taminiau, J. Cramer, T. van der Sar, V. V. Do- brovitski, and R. Hanson, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 171 (2014)

work page 2014

[42] [42]

F. Shi, X. Kong, P. Wang, F. Kong, N. Zhao, R.-B. Liu, and J. Du, Nature Physics 10, 21 (2014)

work page 2014

[43] [43]

K. Herb, T. F. Segawa, L. A. V¨ olker, J. M. Abendroth, E. Janitz, T. Zhu, and C. L. Degen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 133002 (2024),

work page 2024

[44] [44]

Nicolas, T

L. Nicolas, T. Delord, P. Jamonneau, R. Coto, J. Maze, V. Jacques, and G. H´ etet, New Journal of Physics 20, 033007 (2018),

work page 2018

[45] [45]

Jamonneau, G

P. Jamonneau, G. H´ etet, A. Dr´ eau, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 043603 (2016),

work page 2016

[46] [46]

F., Maze, J

Jamonneau, P., Dr´ eau, A., H´ etet, G., Roch, J. F., Maze, J. R., and Jacques, V., Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 228 (2022),

work page 2022

[47] [47]

Huillery, J

P. Huillery, J. Leibold, T. Delord, L. Nicolas, J. Achard, A. Tallaire, and G. H´ etet, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140102 (2021),

work page 2021

[48] [48]

S. Xu, M. Liu, T. Xie, Z. Zhao, Q. Shi, P. Yu, C.-K. Duan, F. Shi, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140101 (2023),

work page 2023

[49] [49]

V. V. Soshenko, V. V. Vorobyov, S. V. Bolshedvorskii, O. Rubinas, I. Cojocaru, B. Kudlatsky, A. I. Zeleneev, V. N. Sorokin, A. N. Smolyaninov, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125133 (2020),

work page 2020

[50] [50]

M. S. J. Barson, P. Reddy, S. Yang, N. B. Manson, J. Wrachtrup, and M. W. Doherty, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094101 (2019),

work page 2019

[51] [51]

H. Wang, S. Wu, K. Jacobs, Y. Duan, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183603 (2025),

work page 2025

[52] [52]

V. V. Soshenko, S. V. Bolshedvorskii, O. Rubinas, V. N. Sorokin, A. N. Smolyaninov, V. V. Vorobyov, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 197702 (2021), . High-Sensitivity Optical Detection of Electron-Nuclear Spin Clusters in Diamond – Supplementary materials – L. Chambard, 1 A. Durand, 1 J. V oisin,1 M. Perdriat, 1 V . Jacques,2 and G. H ´etet1 1Labor...

work page 2021

[53] [53]

Jarmola, I

A. Jarmola, I. Fescenko, V . M. Acosta, M. W. Doherty, F. K. Fatemi, T. Ivanov, D. Budker, and V . S. Malinovsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023094 (2020)

work page 2020

[54] [54]

Pellet-Mary, M

C. Pellet-Mary, M. Perdriat, P . Huillery, and G. H ´etet, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 034050 (2023)

work page 2023

[55] [55]

Findler, R

C. Findler, R. Blinder, K. Sch ¨ule, P . Balasubramanian, C. Osterkamp, and F. Jelezko, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 026203 (2024)

work page 2024

[56] [56]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P . Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013), ISSN 0370- 1573

work page 2013

[57] [57]

Duarte, H

H. Duarte, H. T. Dinani, V . Jacques, and J. R. Maze, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195443 (2021)

work page 2021

[58] [58]

Iv´ady, K

V . Iv´ady, K. Sz ´asz, A. L. Falk, P . V . Klimov, D. J. Christle, E. Janz´en, I. A. Abrikosov, D. D. Awschalom, and A. Gali, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115206 (2015), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115206

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115206 2015

[59] [59]

Lourette, A

S. Lourette, A. Jarmola, V . M. Acosta, A. G. Birdwell, D. Budker, M. W. Doherty, T. Ivanov, and V . S. Malinovsky, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064084 (2023)

work page 2023

[60] [60]

Felton, A

S. Felton, A. M. Edmonds, M. E. Newton, P . M. Martineau, D. Fisher, and D. J. Twitchen, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081201 (2008)

work page 2008

[61] [61]

Waldherr, J

G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, P . Neumann, A. Gali, T. Frauenheim, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157601 (2011)

work page 2011

[62] [62]

M. Chen, M. Hirose, and P . Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. B 92, 020101 (2015)

work page 2015

[63] [63]

Dr ´eau, J.-R

A. Dr ´eau, J.-R. Maze, M. Lesik, J.-F. Roch, and V . Jacques, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134107 (2012)

work page 2012