pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.11451 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Astigmatism-free 3D Optical Tweezer Control for Rapid Atom Rearrangement

Yue-Hui Lu , Nathan Song , Tai Xiang , Jacquelyn Ho , Tsai-Chen Lee , Zhenjie Yan , Dan M. Stamper-Kurn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords optical tweezersacousto-optic deflectorsneutral atom arraysatom transportquantum computing3D controlatom rearrangement
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 3D acousto-optic deflector lens plus fading waveforms lets optical tweezers move freely at over 4.2 m/s across a 200-by-200-by-136-micron volume.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that conventional frequency-chirped AODs suffer from acoustic lensing and path distortion that slow long-range atom moves. By redesigning the deflector into a 3D-AODL and using fading-Shepard drive waveforms, the authors remove those limits and achieve unrestricted three-dimensional tweezer trajectories. The resulting speeds and range directly shorten the time needed to rearrange atoms in neutral-atom arrays. This capability supports faster quantum operations and more complex dynamical potentials in both tweezer arrays and optical lattices.

Core claim

We introduce the three-dimensional acousto-optic deflector lens (3D-AODL) design, which eliminates chirp-induced acoustic lensing and trajectory distortion, together with fading-Shepard waveforms that bypass finite AOD bandwidth to sustain axial motion; together they deliver unrestricted three-dimensional optical-tweezer trajectories over a 200 μm × 200 μm × 136 μm volume at velocities above 4.2 m/s.

What carries the argument

The 3D acousto-optic deflector lens (3D-AODL), a modified AOD geometry that cancels acoustic-lens and chirp-induced aberrations while preserving large transverse and axial scan ranges.

If this is right

  • Transport times for atoms across large arrays drop by more than a factor of two.
  • Arbitrary 3D tweezer paths become possible, allowing dynamical reshaping of trapping potentials.
  • Atom rearrangement and sorting in complex geometries can run at higher clock rates.
  • Neutral-atom processors gain a practical route to scalable, rapid reconfiguration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same 3D control could be combined with larger-scale arrays to test sorting algorithms that were previously too slow.
  • Dynamical potential engineering might allow real-time adjustment of lattice depths or defect patterns during quantum simulation runs.
  • If the method scales without new aberrations, it could shorten the critical path in fault-tolerant neutral-atom architectures that rely on frequent mid-circuit moves.

Load-bearing premise

The 3D-AODL geometry removes acoustic lensing and trajectory distortion exactly as predicted and introduces no new comparable limits inside the demonstrated volume.

What would settle it

Measure the actual beam trajectory or focal spot shape at the corners of the 200 μm × 200 μm × 136 μm volume while driving at 4 m/s; any systematic curvature, astigmatism, or speed drop below 4.2 m/s would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.11451 by Dan M. Stamper-Kurn, Jacquelyn Ho, Nathan Song, Tai Xiang, Tsai-Chen Lee, Yue-Hui Lu, Zhenjie Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: 3D-AODL setup for time-resolved 3D light field tomography. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Comparison of conventional VS 3D-AODL tweezer trajectories. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Constrained vs unconstrained axial transport. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Out-of-plane “L” shaped trajectory of a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Programmable 3D trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reconfigurable neutral-atom arrays are a promising platform for quantum computing, quantum simulation, and quantum metrology, but atom transport using frequency-chirped acousto-optic deflectors (AODs) is limited by chirp-induced acoustic lensing and trajectory distortion. We address these limitations using a three-dimensional acousto-optic deflector lens (3D-AODL), a design predicted to reduce long-range transport times by more than a factor of two. We further introduce fading-Shepard waveforms that circumvent finite AOD bandwidth, enabling sustained axial displacement. We demonstrate unrestricted three-dimensional optical-tweezer motion over a 200 $\mu$m $\times$ 200 $\mu$m $\times$ 136 $\mu$m volume with velocities exceeding 4.2 m/s. Arbitrary three-dimensional control of optical-tweezer trajectories enables rapid atom rearrangement and dynamical engineering of optical potentials in tweezer arrays and optical lattices. This capability advances quantum control and atom manipulation in neutral-atom quantum processors by enabling faster rearrangement, higher clock rates, and scalable sorting in complex geometries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a 3D acousto-optic deflector lens (3D-AODL) design together with fading-Shepard waveforms to eliminate chirp-induced acoustic lensing and finite-bandwidth limitations in AOD-based optical-tweezer transport. It reports an experimental demonstration of unrestricted three-dimensional tweezer motion across a 200 μm × 200 μm × 136 μm volume at velocities exceeding 4.2 m/s, with the stated goal of enabling faster atom rearrangement and dynamical potential engineering in neutral-atom arrays.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold, the work would represent a meaningful advance for neutral-atom quantum processors by shortening transport times and supporting more complex 3D trajectories. The combination of a hardware design that removes a known distortion mechanism with a waveform technique that sustains axial motion is a concrete contribution that could be adopted by other groups working on scalable atom sorting and lattice engineering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Results] Experimental Results section: The central claim of unrestricted 3D motion at >4.2 m/s with no trajectory distortion rests on the assertion that the 3D-AODL plus fading-Shepard approach introduces no new position errors or intensity fluctuations inside the demonstrated volume. However, the manuscript supplies no quantitative error budget, no side-by-side measured-versus-ideal trajectory data at the highest speeds, and no verification that residual acoustic lensing or astigmatism remains negligible. This information is load-bearing for the “unrestricted” claim.
  2. [Design and Prediction] Design and Prediction section: The statement that the 3D-AODL reduces long-range transport times by more than a factor of two is presented as a design prediction. The manuscript does not provide a direct, quantitative comparison of transport times or fidelity against a conventional 2D-AOD baseline under identical conditions, nor does it demonstrate that any new higher-order acoustic effects remain below the threshold that would invalidate the factor-of-two improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure 2 (or equivalent): The caption and axis labels for the 3D trajectory plots should explicitly state the measurement method (e.g., camera-based or interferometric) and the number of repetitions used to generate the shown data.
  2. [Methods] Methods section: The definition of the fading-Shepard waveform parameters (e.g., fade duration, amplitude envelope) should be given with sufficient numerical values to allow reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for recognizing the potential impact of our work on neutral-atom quantum processors. We address the major comments point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional data and analysis where this strengthens the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental Results] Experimental Results section: The central claim of unrestricted 3D motion at >4.2 m/s with no trajectory distortion rests on the assertion that the 3D-AODL plus fading-Shepard approach introduces no new position errors or intensity fluctuations inside the demonstrated volume. However, the manuscript supplies no quantitative error budget, no side-by-side measured-versus-ideal trajectory data at the highest speeds, and no verification that residual acoustic lensing or astigmatism remains negligible. This information is load-bearing for the “unrestricted” claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative error budget and explicit trajectory comparisons would make the 'unrestricted' claim more robust. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated error analysis subsection that reports measured position deviations, velocity fidelity, and intensity fluctuations over the full 200 μm × 200 μm × 136 μm volume at speeds up to 4.2 m/s. Side-by-side measured-versus-ideal trajectory plots are now included for representative high-speed 3D paths, together with wavefront-sensor data confirming that residual astigmatism and acoustic lensing are suppressed below the level that affects atom transport fidelity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Design and Prediction] Design and Prediction section: The statement that the 3D-AODL reduces long-range transport times by more than a factor of two is presented as a design prediction. The manuscript does not provide a direct, quantitative comparison of transport times or fidelity against a conventional 2D-AOD baseline under identical conditions, nor does it demonstrate that any new higher-order acoustic effects remain below the threshold that would invalidate the factor-of-two improvement.

    Authors: The factor-of-two reduction follows directly from the ability to apply higher chirp rates once acoustic lensing is eliminated by the 3D-AODL geometry. We have revised the Design and Prediction section to include a quantitative comparison—both analytic and numerical—of transport times for equivalent long-range moves using the 3D-AODL versus a conventional 2D-AOD under the same acoustic power and bandwidth constraints. We have also added a brief analysis of higher-order acoustic effects (nonlinear propagation, cross-talk) with estimates showing they remain negligible for the distances and velocities demonstrated; these estimates are now supported by the same acoustic beam-propagation model used to design the 3D-AODL. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental demonstration of unrestricted 3D optical-tweezer motion over a defined volume at velocities exceeding 4.2 m/s, achieved via the 3D-AODL design and fading-Shepard waveforms. No mathematical derivation chain, equations, or fitted parameters are shown that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The mention of a 'design predicted to reduce long-range transport times' functions as motivational context rather than a self-referential or load-bearing step that forces the reported results. The outcome is self-contained empirical validation without self-definition, fitted-input predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The central claims rest on the unverified prediction that the 3D-AODL design performs as stated and that the waveforms fully circumvent bandwidth limits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5744 in / 1177 out tokens · 41397 ms · 2026-05-18T07:24:40.508767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    We use a three-dimensional acousto-optic deflector lens (3D-AODL) ... fading-Shepard waveforms that bypass the finite AOD bandwidth and thus enable sustained axial displacement. We demonstrate unrestricted 3D motion within a cuboid volume of at least 200 µm × 200 µm × 136 µm, with tweezer velocities exceeding 4.2 m/s.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Factoring $2048$ bit RSA integers with a half-million-qubit modular atomic processor

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A modular atomic processor with 500,000 qubits factors 2048-bit RSA numbers in roughly the same time as a single large module when inter-module Bell-pair communication runs at 10^5 per second.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individ- ually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with opti- cal tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    M. P. MacDonald, K. Dholakia, D. B. Phillips, and G. C. Spalding, Microfluidic sorting in an optical lattice, Nature426, 421–424 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    D. Ott, S. Nader, S. Reihani, and L. B. Oddershede, Simul- taneous three-dimensional tracking of individual signals from multi-trap optical tweezers using fast and accurate photodiode detection, Optics Express22, 23661 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Arbore, L

    C. Arbore, L. Perego, M. Sergides, and M. Capitanio, Probing force in living cells with optical tweezers: from single-molecule mechanics to cell mechanotransduction, Biophysical Review5, 765 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Bustamante, S

    C. Bustamante, S. Smith, J. Liphardt, and D. Smith, Single-molecule studies of dna mechanics, Current Opinion in Structural Biology10, 279 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆot´e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Physical Review Letters85, 2208 (2000)

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    T. Wilk, A. Ga ¨etan, C. Evellin, J. Wolters, Y . Miroshnychenko, P. Grangier, and A. Browaeys, Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using rydberg blockade, Physical Review Letters 104, 010502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    T. M. Graham, Y . Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, and L. Phuttitarn, Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature604, 175–180 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. S. Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum pro- cessor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Henriet, L

    L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, G.- O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum computing with neutral 9 atoms, Quantum4, 327 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, et al., Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and com- puting with rydberg-interacting qubits, A VS Quantum Science 3, 023501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    H. Kim, M. Kim, W. Lee, and J. Ahn, Gerchberg-saxton al- gorithm for fast and efficient atom rearrangement in optical tweezer traps, Opt. Express27, 2184 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Stuart and A

    D. Stuart and A. Kuhn, Single-atom trapping and transport in dmd-controlled optical tweezers, New Journal of Physics20, 023013 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Korpel,Acousto-optics(Marcel Dekker, 1988)

    A. Korpel,Acousto-optics(Marcel Dekker, 1988)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    Korpel, Acousto-optics—a review of fundamentals, Pro- ceedings of the IEEE69, 48 (1981)

    A. Korpel, Acousto-optics—a review of fundamentals, Pro- ceedings of the IEEE69, 48 (1981)

    work page 1981

  18. [18]

    Kaplan, N

    A. Kaplan, N. Friedman, and N. Davidson, Acousto-optic lens with very fast focus scanning, Opt. Lett.26, 1078 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Gyger, M

    F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Snigirev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices (2024), arXiv:2402.04994 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits (2025), arXiv:2403.12021 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    N.-C. Chiu, E. C. Trapp, J. Guo, M. H. Abobeih, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, P. L. Stroganov, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, S. H. Li, X. Lyu, L. M. Peters, D. Bluvstein, T. T. Wang, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system, Nature 10.1038/s41586-025- 09596-6 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025- 2025

  22. [22]

    Lin, H.-S

    R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y . Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y . Gao, Y .-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y .-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.-C. Chen, C.-Y . Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Ai-enabled parallel assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    K. Kim, K. Kim, and J. Ahn, Blinking optical tweezers for atom rearrangements (2025), arXiv:2502.04612 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Hwang, A

    H. Hwang, A. Byun, J. Park, S. de L´es´eleuc, and J. Ahn, Optical tweezers throw and catch single atoms, Optica10, 401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Hwang, H

    S. Hwang, H. Hwang, K. Kim, A. Byun, K. Kim, S. Jeong, M. P. Soegianto, and J. Ahn, Fast and reliable atom transport by opti- cal tweezers, Optica Quantum3(2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Cicali, M

    C. Cicali, M. Calzavara, E. Cuestas, T. Calarco, R. Zeier, and F. Motzoi, Fast neutral-atom transport and transfer between op- tical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 024070 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Pagano, D

    A. Pagano, D. Jaschke, W. Weiss, and S. Montangero, Optimal control transport of neutral atoms in optical tweezers at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033282 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Reddy and P

    G. Reddy and P. Saggau, Fast three-dimensional laser scanning scheme using acousto-optic deflectors, Journal of Biomedical Optics10, 064038 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    P. A. Kirkby, K. M. N. S. Nadella, and R. A. Silver, A compact acousto-optic lens for 2d and 3d femtosecond based 2-photon microscopy, Opt. Express18, 13720 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Szalay, L

    G. Szalay, L. Jud ´ak, G. Katona, K. ´Ocsai, G. Juh ´asz, M. Ver- ess, Z. Szadai, A. Feh ´er, T. Tompa, B. Chiovini, P. Ma´ak, and B. R´ozsa, Fast 3d imaging of spine, dendritic, and neuronal as- semblies in behaving animals, Neuron92, 723 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    K. M. N. S. Nadella, H. Roˇs, C. Baragli, V . A. Griffiths, G. Kon- stantinou, T. Koimtzis, G. J. Evans, P. A. Kirkby, and R. A. Silver, Random-access scanning microscopy for 3d imaging in awake behaving animals, Nature Methods13, 1001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Katona, G

    G. Katona, G. Szalay, P. Ma´ak, A. Kasz´as, M. Veress, D. Hillier, B. Chiovini, E. S. Vizi, B. Roska, and B. R ´ozsa, Fast two- photon in vivo imaging with three-dimensional random-access scanning in large tissue volumes, Nature Methods9, 201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    J. M. Soto, J. A. Rodrigo, and T. Alieva, Achieving fast 3d label-free microscopy for optical tweezers experiments, in Imaging and Applied Optics 2018 (3D, AO, AIO, COSI, DH, IS, LACSEA, LS&C, MATH, pcAOP)(Optica Publishing Group,

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Theoretical derivation available as supplementary material

    work page

  35. [35]

    KORPEL, Acousto-optics (Elsevier, 1972) pp

    A. KORPEL, Acousto-optics (Elsevier, 1972) pp. 71–180

    work page 1972

  36. [36]

    R ´ozsa, G

    B. R ´ozsa, G. Katona, M. Veress, P. Maak, G. Szalay, A. Kasz´as, B. Chiovini, and P. M´aty´as, Method for scanning along a con- tinuous scanning trajectory with a scanner system (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Y . Wang, S. Shevate, T. M. Wintermantel, M. Morgado, G. Loc- head, S. Whitlock,et al., Preparation of hundreds of micro- scopic atomic ensembles in optical tweezer arrays, npj Quan- tum Information6, 54 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    S. Kuhr, W. Alt, D. Schrader, I. Dotsenko, Y . Miroshnychenko, A. Rauschenbeutel, and D. Meschede, Analysis of dephasing mechanisms in a standing-wave dipole trap, Physical Review A 72, 023406 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. An- schuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V . Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one- dimensional cold atom arrays, Science354, 1024 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    M. G. Gazalet, J. C. Kastelik, C. Bruneel, O. Bazzi, and E. Bridoux, Acousto-optic multifrequency modulators: reduc- tion of the phase-grating, intermodulation products, Applied Optics32, 2455 (1993)

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    Schroeder, Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (corresp.), IEEE Transac- tions on Information Theory16, 85 (1970)

    M. Schroeder, Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (corresp.), IEEE Transac- tions on Information Theory16, 85 (1970)

    work page 1970

  42. [42]

    Narahashi and T

    S. Narahashi and T. Nojima, New phasing scheme of ¡i¿n¡/i¿- multiple carriers for reducing peak-to-average power ratio, Electronics Letters30, 1382 (1994)

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V . Lienhard, S. de L ´es´eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Synthetic three-dimensional atomic structures as- sembled atom by atom, Nature561, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    W. Lee, H. Kim, and J. Ahn, Three-dimensional rearrangement of single atoms using actively controlled optical microtraps, Opt. Express24, 9816 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Schlosser, S

    M. Schlosser, S. Tichelmann, D. Sch ¨affner, D. O. de Mello, M. Hambach, J. Sch ¨utz, and G. Birkl, Scalable multilayer ar- chitecture of assembled single-atom qubit arrays in a three- dimensional talbot tweezer lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 180601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Gyger, M

    F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Snigirev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    M. A. Norcia, H. Kim, W. B. Cairncross,et al., Iterative assem- bly of 171Ybatom arrays with cavity-enhanced optical lattices, PRX Quantum5, 030316 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    R. Tao, M. Ammenwerth, F. Gyger, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, High-fidelity detection of large-scale atom arrays in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 013401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    J. S. Peter, S. Ostermann, and S. F. Yelin, Chirality dependent photon transport and helical superradiance, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023200 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    P. T. Grochowski, H. Pichler, C. A. Regal, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum control of continuous systems via nonharmonic po- 10 tential modulation, Quantum9, 1824 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Zhang, P

    B. Zhang, P. Peng, A. Paul, and J. D. Thompson, Scaled local gate controller for optically addressed qubits, Optica11, 227 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Radnaev, W

    A. Radnaev, W. Chung, D. Cole, D. Mason,et al., Univer- sal neutral-atom quantum computer with individual optical ad- dressing and nondestructive readout, PRX Quantum6, 030334 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    R ´ozsa, G

    B. R ´ozsa, G. Szalay, and G. Katona, Acousto-optical scanning- based high-speed 3d two-photon imaging in vivo, inAdvanced Patch-Clamp Analysis for Neuroscientists, edited by A. Korn- green (Springer New York, New York, NY , 2016) pp. 213–245

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    L. R. B. Picard and M. Endres, A three-dimensional acousto- optic deflector (2025), arXiv:2510.07633 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2025