pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17549 · v4 · submitted 2025-10-20 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph

Electromagnetic form factors and structure of the T_(bb) tetraquark from lattice QCD

Ivan Vujmilovic , Sara Collins , Luka Leskovec , Sasa Prelovsek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-ph
keywords lattice QCDtetraquarkelectromagnetic form factorsT_bbdiquark structureheavy quarkscharge radiusexotic hadrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice QCD finds the T_bb tetraquark has a compact diquark structure with charge radius smaller than the B plus B* threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the electromagnetic form factors of the doubly-bottom tetraquark T_bb for the first time on the lattice. These form factors separate the contributions from light and heavy quarks and show a compact charge distribution. The extracted radius is significantly smaller than the sum of radii for the B and B* mesons that form the lowest threshold, supporting the picture of a tightly bound heavy diquark paired with a light antidiquark rather than a loosely bound molecular state.

Core claim

The electromagnetic form factors indicate that T_bb is a bound state consisting of a compact heavy diquark [bb] in a color-antitriplet with spin one and a light antidiquark [ūd] in a color-triplet with spin zero. The charge radius of T_bb is significantly smaller than the combined charge radii of the B and B* mesons.

What carries the argument

Electromagnetic form factors extracted separately for light and heavy quarks, which encode the spatial charge distribution and magnetic dipole moments inside the tetraquark.

If this is right

  • The tetraquark is more compact than a conventional meson pair, favoring a diquark-antidiquark binding mechanism over a molecular one.
  • Similar compact structures may appear in other doubly-heavy tetraquarks and can be tested with the same form-factor techniques.
  • The separate light and heavy quark contributions provide input for effective models of heavy-quark exotics.
  • The smaller radius implies a more localized current distribution that could affect electromagnetic transition rates to other states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the compact picture holds at physical quark masses, it would strengthen predictions for the existence of stable doubly-bottom tetraquarks below the BB* threshold.
  • Extending the same form-factor analysis to other quantum numbers or flavor combinations could map out which exotic states are compact versus extended.
  • The result supplies a concrete benchmark for comparing lattice data with potential-model or QCD-sum-rule calculations of tetraquark radii.

Load-bearing premise

A single ensemble with unphysical pion mass and moderate lattice spacing is enough to interpret the radius comparison as evidence for compact structure without large finite-volume or discretization effects.

What would settle it

A calculation on finer lattices or at the physical pion mass that yields a T_bb charge radius comparable to or larger than the sum of B and B* radii would undermine the compact-diquark interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.17549 by Ivan Vujmilovic, Luka Leskovec, Sara Collins, Sasa Prelovsek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Form factors of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first lattice QCD determination of the electromagnetic form factors of the exotic tetraquark $T_{bb} \ (bb \bar u \bar d)$ with quantum numbers $I( J^P ) = 0( 1^+ )$. The extracted form factors encode information about its internal structure, including the charge distribution and the magnetic dipole moments, determined separately for the light and heavy quarks. Our results provide evidence in favor of it being a bound state consisting of a compact heavy diquark $[bb]$ in a color-antitriplet with spin one, and a light antidiquark $[\bar u \bar d]$ in a color-triplet with spin zero. The charge radius of $T_{bb}$ is found to be significantly smaller than the combined charge radii of $B$ and $B^*$ mesons. These two comprise the lowest-lying threshold $BB^*$ in the channel we are considering, and their electric charge form factors are also determined. The computations were performed on a single CLS ensemble with $N_f = 2+1$ dynamical quarks and a lattice spacing of approximately $a \approx0.064 \ \mathrm{fm}$ at the pion mass $m_\pi \approx 290 \ \mathrm{MeV}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first lattice QCD determination of the electromagnetic form factors of the T_bb tetraquark (bbūd) with I(J^P)=0(1^+). Computations are performed on a single N_f=2+1 CLS ensemble with a≈0.064 fm and m_π≈290 MeV. Electric and magnetic form factors are extracted separately for light and heavy quark sectors; the results are interpreted as evidence for a compact heavy diquark [bb] (color antitriplet, spin 1) plus light antidiquark [ūd] (color triplet, spin 0), with the T_bb charge radius reported to be significantly smaller than the sum of the B and B* radii (the BB* threshold).

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing systematics, the work supplies the first ab initio lattice information on the internal charge and magnetization distributions of a doubly heavy tetraquark, including flavor-separated contributions. The direct comparison of radii to the two-meson threshold states is a useful diagnostic for the proposed diquark structure. The calculation is performed from first principles with external inputs (spacing, quark masses) taken from established CLS ensembles; this constitutes a reproducible starting point for future multi-ensemble studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the headline claim that the T_bb charge radius is 'significantly smaller' than the combined B+B* radii is extracted from the slope of the electric form factor at Q²=0, yet no fit ranges, number of states retained in the two-point and three-point correlator fits, or quantitative assessment of excited-state contamination are provided. Because this slope difference is load-bearing for the compact-diquark interpretation, a complete error budget that includes these systematics on the single ensemble is required.
  2. [Discussion of structure and radius comparison] Discussion of structure and radius comparison: the interpretation that the smaller radius evidences a compact [bb] diquark (rather than a lattice artifact) assumes that discretization effects in the local vector current and finite-volume corrections to the extended wave functions affect the tetraquark and the BB* threshold states comparably. With data from only one ensemble (a≈0.064 fm, m_π≈290 MeV, no volume or spacing variation), this assumption is untested and directly impacts the structural conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the light and heavy contributions to the form factors should be defined explicitly in the text (or a table) rather than only in figure captions to improve readability.
  2. [Computational details] The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of the number of configurations and source-sink separations used for the three-point functions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our analysis and to clarify the limitations of the single-ensemble study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results section] Abstract and results section: the headline claim that the T_bb charge radius is 'significantly smaller' than the combined B+B* radii is extracted from the slope of the electric form factor at Q²=0, yet no fit ranges, number of states retained in the two-point and three-point correlator fits, or quantitative assessment of excited-state contamination are provided. Because this slope difference is load-bearing for the compact-diquark interpretation, a complete error budget that includes these systematics on the single ensemble is required.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit description of the fitting procedure and a fuller error budget. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection in the results section that specifies the fit ranges for the two-point and three-point correlators, the number of states retained in the multi-exponential fits, and the quantitative checks performed to assess excited-state contamination (including variation of source-sink separations and comparison between single- and two-state fits). We have also expanded the error budget to include these systematic contributions and have updated the abstract and results text to reflect the revised uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of structure and radius comparison] Discussion of structure and radius comparison: the interpretation that the smaller radius evidences a compact [bb] diquark (rather than a lattice artifact) assumes that discretization effects in the local vector current and finite-volume corrections to the extended wave functions affect the tetraquark and the BB* threshold states comparably. With data from only one ensemble (a≈0.064 fm, m_π≈290 MeV, no volume or spacing variation), this assumption is untested and directly impacts the structural conclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the single-ensemble setup precludes a direct test of whether discretization and finite-volume effects cancel in the radius comparison. All quantities were nevertheless computed on the identical ensemble with the same action, quark masses, and volume, so the relative difference remains a meaningful diagnostic at this stage. We have inserted an explicit paragraph in the discussion section that states this limitation, notes that the present results constitute a first indication rather than a definitive proof, and outlines the need for future multi-ensemble studies with varied lattice spacings and volumes to confirm the structural interpretation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct lattice extraction of form factors

full rationale

The paper computes electromagnetic form factors directly from lattice QCD correlation functions on a single CLS ensemble, extracting charge radii from the Q² slope at zero momentum transfer. These quantities are numerical outputs of the simulation rather than quantities fitted to data within the paper and then re-labeled as predictions. The structural interpretation (compact diquark) follows as an inference from the relative size of the computed T_bb radius versus the separately computed B and B* radii on the same ensemble. Lattice spacing and quark-mass inputs are taken from prior CLS work but function as fixed external parameters; they do not create a definitional or self-referential loop inside the present derivation. No self-citation load-bearing step, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results occurs in the central chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard lattice QCD axioms plus the assumption that the extracted form factors can be directly mapped to a compact diquark picture without additional model input.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Lattice regularization of QCD with Wilson or similar fermions reproduces continuum QCD in the a→0 limit
    Invoked implicitly when interpreting results at finite a≈0.064 fm as physical.
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic form factors extracted from three-point correlation functions encode the internal charge and magnetic structure of the state
    Central interpretive step linking lattice data to diquark picture.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5767 in / 1370 out tokens · 27780 ms · 2026-05-18T06:14:39.566427+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Kapitza Dynamics as a New Stabilization Mechanism for Heavy Tetraquarks

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Kapitza dynamics creates a stabilizing short-range repulsion in the diquark-antidiquark potential, allowing stable heavy tetraquarks whose masses match X(3872) and lattice QCD results.

  2. Kapitza Dynamics as a New Stabilization Mechanism for Heavy Tetraquarks

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Kapitza dynamics supplies a short-range 1/r^4 repulsion in a modified Cornell potential, stabilizing heavy tetraquarks and reproducing the X(3872) mass while predicting a bound T_bb consistent with lattice results.

  3. Deciphering the nature of $P^{\Sigma}_{\psi s}$ pentaquarks in the light of their electromagnetic multipole moments

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Electromagnetic moments of Σ-type pentaquarks are computed via light-cone sum rules, yielding flavor-sensitive magnetic dipoles, quadrupoles, and octupoles that distinguish diquark types and rule out S-wave molecules.

  4. Deciphering the nature of $P^{\Sigma}_{\psi s}$ pentaquarks in the light of their electromagnetic multipole moments

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QCD light-cone sum rules computation of magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic octupole moments for Σ-type P_ψs pentaquarks, with quark-flavor decomposition and model discriminants.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett.8, 214 (1964)

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking. Version 2 (1964) pp. 22–101

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    R. L. Jaffe, Exotica, Phys. Rept.409, 1 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy- Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.93, 143 (2017), arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB ± →K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0309032. 6

    work page arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), Observation of a resonance- like structure in theπ ±ψ′ mass distribution in exclu- siveB→Kπ ±ψ′ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 142001 (2008), arXiv:0708.1790 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e- to pi+pi-J/psi at \sqrt{s}=4.26 GeV

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat√s=4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252001 (2013), arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Observation of a broad struc- ture in theπ +π−J/ψmass spectrum around 4.26- GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 142001 (2005), arXiv:hep- ex/0506081

    work page arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation ofJ/ψpReso- nances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ 0 b → J/ψK −pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072001 (2015), arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, $P_c(4312)^+$, and of two-peak structure of the $P_c(4450)^+$

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation of a narrow pen- taquark state,P c(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of theP c(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 222001 (2019), arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Evidence for a Narrow Near-Threshold Structure in the $J/\psi\phi$ Mass Spectrum in $B^+\to J/\psi\phi K^+$ Decays

    T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF), Evidence for a Narrow Near- Threshold Structure in theJ/ψϕMass Spectrum in B+ →J/ψϕK + Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 242002 (2009), arXiv:0903.2229 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  13. [13]

    Observation of $J/\psi\phi$ structures consistent with exotic states from amplitude analysis of $B^+\to J/\psi \phi K^+$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation ofJ/ψϕstructures consistent with exotic states from amplitude analysis of B+ →J/ψϕK + decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 022003 (2017), arXiv:1606.07895 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), arXiv:2109.01038 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), arXiv:2109.01038 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Bicudo, Tetraquarks and pentaquarks in lattice QCD with light and heavy quarks, Phys

    P. Bicudo, Tetraquarks and pentaquarks in lattice QCD with light and heavy quarks, Phys. Rept.1039, 1 (2023), arXiv:2212.07793 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Francis, Lattice perspectives on doubly heavy tetraquarks, Prog

    A. Francis, Lattice perspectives on doubly heavy tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.140, 104143 (2025), arXiv:2502.04701 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical sta- tus and perspectives, Phys. Rept.873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Hadron Spectroscopy with Lattice QCD,

    J. Bulava et al., Hadron Spectroscopy with Lattice QCD, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2203.03230 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Heavy-quark symmetry im- plies stable heavy tetraquark mesonsQ iQj ¯qk ¯ql, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 202002 (2017), arXiv:1707.09575 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Bicudo and M

    P. Bicudo and M. Wagner (European Twisted Mass Collaboration), Lattice qcd signal for a bottom-bottom tetraquark, Phys. Rev. D87, 114511 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Karliner and J

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Discovery of the doubly charmed Ξ cc baryon implies a stablebb udtetraquark, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 202001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Vijande, A

    J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and N. Barnea, Exotic meson- meson molecules and compact four-quark states, Phys. Rev. D79, 074010 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Brambilla, A

    N. Brambilla, A. Mohapatra, T. Scirpa, and A. Vairo, Nature ofχc1(3872) and Tcc+(3875), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 131902 (2025), arXiv:2411.14306 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Hoffer, G

    J. Hoffer, G. Eichmann, and C. S. Fischer, Struc- ture of open-flavor four-quark states in the charm and bottom region, Phys. Rev. D111, 054028 (2025), arXiv:2409.05779 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    The Tcc = DD* molecular state

    D. Janc and M. Rosina, TheT cc =DD ∗ molecular state, Few Body Syst.35, 175 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Maiani, A

    L. Maiani, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Doubly heavy tetraquarks in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, Phys. Lett. B836, 137624 (2023), arXiv:2208.02730 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    R. J. Hudspith and D. Mohler, Exotic tetraquark states with two bquarks andJ P = 0 + and 1 + Bs states in a nonperturbatively tuned lattice nrqcd setup, Phys. Rev. D107, 114510 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Leskovec, S

    L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wag- ner, Lattice qcd investigation of a doubly-bottom bbud tetraquark with quantum numbersi(J P ) = 0(1+), Phys. Rev. D100, 014503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Colquhoun, A

    B. Colquhoun, A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, K. Maltman, and W. G. Parrott, Improved analysis of strong-interaction-stable doubly bottom tetraquarks on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D110, 094503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Alexandrou, J

    C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, bbudand bbustetraquarks from lattice qcd using symmetric correlation matrices with both local and scattering interpolating operators, Phys. Rev. D110, 054510 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    T. Aoki, S. Aoki, and T. Inoue, Lattice study on a tetraquark stateT bb in the hal qcd method, Phys. Rev. D108, 054502 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Junnarkar, N

    P. Junnarkar, N. Mathur, and M. Padmanath, Study of doubly heavy tetraquarks in lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034507 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Prelovsek, E

    S. Prelovsek, E. Ortiz-Pacheco, S. Collins, L. Leskovec, M. Padmanath, and I. Vujmilovic, Doubly heavy tetraquarks from lattice qcd: Incorporating diquark- antidiquark operators and the left-hand cut, Phys. Rev. D112, 014507 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    B. S. Tripathy, N. Mathur, and M. Padmanath, bbu¯d¯ and bsu¯d¯tetraquarks from lattice QCD using two- meson and diquark-antidiquark variational basis, Phys. Rev. D111, 114504 (2025), arXiv:2503.09760 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Determination of the pion charge form factor for Q^2=0.60-1.60 GeV^2

    V. Tadevosyan et al. (Jefferson Lab F(pi)), Determina- tion of the pion charge form-factor for Q**2 = 0.60- GeV**2 - 1.60-GeV**2, Phys. Rev. C75, 055205 (2007), arXiv:nucl-ex/0607007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    G. M. Huber et al. (Jefferson Lab), Charged pion form- factor between Q**2 = 0.60-GeV**2 and 2.45-GeV**2. II. Determination of, and results for, the pion form- factor, Phys. Rev. C78, 045203 (2008), arXiv:0809.3052 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    X. Gao, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syrit- syn, and Y. Zhao, Pion form factor and charge radius from lattice qcd at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D104, 114515 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, I. Clo¨ et, M. Constantinou, J. Delmar, K. Hadjiyiannakou, G. Koutsou, C. Lauer, and A. Vaquero (ETM Collaboration), Scalar, vector, and tensor form factors for the pion and kaon from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D105, 054502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3), Measurement of the Pion Form Factor with CMD-3 Detector and its Implication to the Hadronic Contribution to Muon (g-2), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 231903 (2024), arXiv:2309.12910 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    F. G. Ortega-Gama, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards (for the Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Timelike me- son form factors beyond the elastic region from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D110, 094505 (2024). 7

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finken- rath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, and A. V. Aviles-Casco, Proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D100, 014509 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Djukanovic, G

    D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, M. Salg, and H. Wittig, Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon fromN f = 2 + 1 lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094510 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    S. Park, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, S. Mondal, T. Bhattacharya, Y.-C. Jang, B. Jo´ o, and F. Winter (Nucleon Matrix Ele- ments (NME) Collaboration), Precision nucleon charges and form factors using (2 + 1)-flavor lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D105, 054505 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    C. Chen, C. S. Fischer, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Nucleon axial-vector and pseudoscalar form factors and pcac relations, Phys. Rev. D105, 094022 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    M. K. Jones et al. (Jefferson Lab Hall A),G Ep/GM p ratio by polarization transfer in⃗ ep→e⃗ p, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1398 (2000), arXiv:nucl-ex/9910005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    S. N. Santiesteban et al. (Jefferson Lab Hall A), Novel Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor from A=3 Mirror Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 162501 (2024), arXiv:2304.13770 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Separated Kaon Electroproduction Cross Section and the Kaon Form Factor from 6 GeV JLab Data

    M. Carmignotto et al., Separated Kaon Electroproduc- tion Cross Section and the Kaon Form Factor from 6 GeV JLab Data, Phys. Rev. C97, 025204 (2018), arXiv:1801.01536 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Alexandrou, G

    C. Alexandrou, G. Koutsou, H. Neff, J. W. Negele, W. Schroers, and A. Tsapalis, Nucleon to delta elec- tromagnetic transition form factors in lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D77, 085012 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, Gravi- tational form factors of the proton from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251904 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Delaney, C

    J. Delaney, C. E. Thomas, and S. M. Ryan (Hadron Spec- trum), Radiative transitions in charmonium from lattice QCD, JHEP05, 230, arXiv:2301.08213 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. G. Richards, Radia- tive transitions in charmonium from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D73, 074507 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Lattice evidence that scalar glueballs are small,

    R. Abbott, D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, F. Romero- L´ opez, and P. E. Shanahan, Lattice evidence that scalar glueballs are small, (2025), arXiv:2508.21821 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Ramalho, Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω − baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions, Phys

    G. Ramalho, Electromagnetic form factors of the Ω − baryon in the spacelike and timelike regions, Phys. Rev. D103, 074018 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    A. J. Buchmann, E. Hern´ andez, and A. Faessler, Elec- tromagnetic properties of the ∆(1232), Phys. Rev. C55, 448 (1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    Leskovec, S

    L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, M. Petschlies, J. Negele, S. Paul, and A. Pochinsky,b→ρℓ νresonance form factors from b→ππℓ νin lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 161901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Y. Tan, X. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Wu, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Equivalence among color-singlet, color-octet, and di- quark structures in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076026 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Padmanath, C

    M. Padmanath, C. B. Lang, and S. Prelovsek,x(3872) andy(4140) using diquark-antidiquark operators with lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D92, 034501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    R. A. Brice˜ no and M. T. Hansen, Relativistic, model- independent, multichannel 2→2 transition amplitudes in a finite volume, Phys. Rev. D94, 013008 (2016), arXiv:1509.08507 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Baroni, R

    A. Baroni, R. A. Brice˜ no, M. T. Hansen, and F. G. Ortega-Gama, Form factors of two-hadron states from a covariant finite-volume formalism, Phys. Rev. D100, 034511 (2019), arXiv:1812.10504 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Durand, P

    L. Durand, P. C. DeCelles, and R. B. Marr, Lorentz in- variance and the kinematic structure of vertex functions, Phys. Rev.126, 1882 (1962)

    work page 1962

  61. [61]

    Khodjamirian, Hadron Form Factors (CRC Press, 2020)

    A. Khodjamirian, Hadron Form Factors (CRC Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    R. G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson, and F. Gross, Polarization transfer in elastic electron scattering from nucleons and deuterons, Phys. Rev. C23, 363 (1981)

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    Gross, Relativistic calculation of the deuteron electro- magnetic form factor

    F. Gross, Relativistic calculation of the deuteron electro- magnetic form factor. ii, Phys. Rev.136, B140 (1964)

    work page 1964

  64. [64]

    Haberzettl, Model-independent form-factor con- straints for electromagnetic spin-1 currents, Phys

    H. Haberzettl, Model-independent form-factor con- straints for electromagnetic spin-1 currents, Phys. Rev. D100, 036008 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Electromagnetic Properties for Arbitrary Spin Particles: Part 1 $-$ Electromagnetic Current and Multipole Decomposition

    C. Lorce, Electromagnetic Properties for Arbitrary Spin Particles. Part 1. Electromagnetic Current and Multipole Decomposition, (2009), arXiv:0901.4199 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, P. Georg, D. Jenkins, P. Korcyl, A. Sch¨ afer, E. E. Scholz, J. Simeth, W. S¨ oldner, and S. Weish¨ aupl (RQCD), Scale setting and the light baryon spectrum in N f = 2 + 1 QCD with Wilson fermions, JHEP05, 035, arXiv:2211.03744 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Simulation of QCD with N_f=2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions

    M. Bruno et al., Simulation of QCD with N f = 2 + 1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, JHEP02, 043, arXiv:1411.3982 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Heavy Quarks on Anisotropic Lattices: The Charmonium Spectrum

    P. Chen, Heavy quarks on anisotropic lattices: The Char- monium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D64, 034509 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0006019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  69. [69]

    Supplemental material: Electromagnetic form factors of Tbb tetraquark from lattice QCD

    work page

  70. [70]

    C. G. Boyd, B. Grinstein, and R. F. Lebed, Con- straints on form-factors for exclusive semileptonic heavy to light meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4603 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412324

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  71. [71]

    C. G. Boyd and M. J. Savage, Analyticity, shapes of semileptonic form-factors, and anti-B —>pi lepton anti-neutrino, Phys. Rev. D56, 303 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9702300

    work page arXiv 1997

  72. [72]

    Model-independent description of $B\to \pi l\nu$ decays and a determination of $|V_{ub}|$

    C. Bourrely, I. Caprini, and L. Lellouch, Model- independent description of B —>pi l nu decays and a determination of —V(ub)—, Phys. Rev. D79, 013008 (2009), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 82, 099902 (2010)], arXiv:0807.2722 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    Zhang, W.-X

    K.-K. Zhang, W.-X. Zhang, and D. Jia, Systematics of doubly heavy strange and nonstrange tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D112, 054008 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Double-heavy tetraquark states with heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry,

    J.-B. Cheng, S.-Y. Li, Y.-R. Liu, Z.-G. Si, and T. Yao, Double-heavy tetraquark states with heavy diquark- antiquark symmetry, Chin. Phys. C45, 043102 (2021), arXiv:2008.00737 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    S. H. Lee and S. Yasui, Stable multiquark states with heavy quarks in a diquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C64, 283 (2009), arXiv:0901.2977 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    Charge radii of light and heavy mesons

    C.-W. Hwang, Charge radii of light and heavy mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C23, 585 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0112237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  77. [77]

    A. S. Miramontes, J. Papavassiliou, and J. M. Pawlowski, Electromagnetic properties of heavy-light mesons, (2025), arXiv:2508.20631 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    On internal structure of the heavy-light mesons

    D. Becirevic, E. Chang, and A. Le Yaouanc, On internal structure of the heavy-light mesons, Phys. Rev. D80, 8 034504 (2009), arXiv:0905.3352 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    A. M. Green, J. Koponen, P. Pennanen, and C. Michael (UKQCD Collaboration), Charge and matter radial dis- tributions of heavy-light mesons calculated on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D65, 014512 (2001)

    work page 2001

  80. [80]

    The radial distributions of a heavy-light meson on a lattice

    J. Koponen, A. M. Green, C. Michael, and P. Pennanen (UKQCD), The Radial distributions of a heavy light me- son on a lattice, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.119, 638 (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0209100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.