pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17730 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-20 · ✦ hep-ph

Automated computation of spin-density matrices and quantum observables for collider physics

Valentin Durupt , Fabio Maltoni , Olivier Mattelaer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 05:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords spin density matricesquantum observablescollider processeshelicity amplitudesentanglementquantum correlationstree levelevent files
0
0 comments X

The pith

A framework automates the computation of production spin-density matrices for generic collider processes at tree level.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an automated framework for calculating production spin-density matrices in particle collisions at the tree level. These matrices represent the quantum states of produced particles and are saved in a compact form in event files. This allows researchers to analyze quantum properties such as entanglement and polarization after the simulation. A set of analysis routines is included to compute measures like purity, concurrence, negativity, and magic measures for qubit and qutrit systems. The method is validated on known cases and used to explore quantum correlations in complex LHC processes involving multiple tops and bosons.

Core claim

The paper establishes a systematic procedure that takes helicity amplitudes for generic processes and constructs event-by-event production spin-density matrices. These matrices are output in the LHE format with run information, supporting various final state dimensions and initial state configurations, so that quantum-information quantities can be evaluated directly in post-processing.

What carries the argument

Event-by-event production spin-density matrices constructed from helicity amplitudes, which preserve the full quantum information of the multi-particle final state for subsequent analysis.

If this is right

  • Spin-density matrices for top-quark pair production and vector boson pair production can be computed and compared to existing results.
  • Quantum measures including entanglement witnesses become accessible for processes with three or four top quarks.
  • Configurable reference frames and initial state polarizations allow flexible studies of spin correlations.
  • A library of routines computes D-coefficients, correlation matrices, and stabiliser-based magic measures for the final states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This automation opens the door to scanning quantum properties across large samples of simulated events without manual amplitude calculations.
  • Connections to quantum information theory could lead to new observables sensitive to new physics effects in high-energy collisions.
  • The approach might be extended to loop-level calculations to study how quantum correlations change with higher-order corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The helicity amplitudes for the processes can be assembled into compact production spin-density matrices that retain all quantum information without errors in the automation.

What would settle it

Computing the spin-density matrix for top pair production in proton-proton collisions and finding it differs from the known analytical result in a specific matrix element would falsify the correctness of the assembly method.

read the original abstract

We present a fully automated framework to compute production spin-density matrices for generic collider processes at tree level within \textsc{MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}. The method assembles helicity amplitudes into event-by-event production matrices. These are written to the LHE file in a compact form, together with run metadata, enabling direct post-processing of quantum observables. The implementation supports bi- and multipartite qubit and qutrit final states, configurable reference frames, and both polarised and unpolarised initial states. A companion, easy-to-extend library provides analysis routines to determine key quantum-information measures and witnesses. These include purity, concurrence, and entanglement of formation for qubits; Peres--Horodecki tests and negativity; spin-polarisation vectors and correlation matrices; $D$-coefficients; and stabiliser-based ``magic'' measures. As a result, multi-particle quantum correlations can be quantified systematically. We validate the implementation against known results for $t\bar t$ and $VV$ ($V=W^\pm,Z$) production in $pp$ and $e^+e^-$ collisions and in heavy-resonance decays. We then consider new applications and study quantum correlations in several LHC final states: $t\bar t W^\pm$, $tW^-$ vs.\ $t(\bar t\to W^- \bar b)$, and $t\bar t t$ vs. $t\bar t t\bar t$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fully automated framework integrated into MadGraph5_aMC@NLO to compute production spin-density matrices at tree level for generic collider processes. Helicity amplitudes are assembled into event-by-event matrices that are written to LHE files together with metadata, enabling post-processing via a companion library to extract quantum observables and measures such as purity, concurrence, negativity, spin-polarisation vectors, correlation matrices, D-coefficients, and stabiliser-based magic measures. The implementation supports bi- and multipartite qubit/qutrit states with configurable reference frames and both polarised and unpolarised beams. Validation is reported against known ttbar and VV results, followed by applications to ttW, tW, ttt, and tttt final states.

Significance. If the matrix construction preserves quantum information without phase or frame errors, the work provides a practical tool for systematic studies of multi-particle entanglement and spin correlations at colliders. Integration with a standard generator and the provision of an extendable analysis library are clear strengths that could enable routine exploration of quantum-information quantities in complex LHC final states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3] Section 3 (matrix assembly): the central step that forms ρ_{λ,λ′} ∝ ∑ A_λ A^*_{λ′} from MadGraph helicity amplitudes is described at a high level, but no explicit account is given of global-phase conventions or consistent boost/reference-frame definitions across three or more legs. This is load-bearing for the multipartite claim, as relative phases directly affect off-diagonal elements used in negativity or concurrence for ttt and tttt.
  2. [Section 5] Section 5 (applications): the new results for ttt and tttt are presented without an independent cross-check (e.g., comparison to a manually computed toy case or symbolic verification of a small subset of matrix elements). Validation is confined to two-particle systems (ttbar, VV) where external benchmarks exist; extending the same code path to three- and four-particle states therefore rests on untested assumptions about the automation layer.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the term 'D-coefficients' appears without a short definition or reference; a parenthetical clarification would help readers outside the spin-correlation community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (matrix assembly): the central step that forms ρ_{λ,λ′} ∝ ∑ A_λ A^*_{λ′} from MadGraph helicity amplitudes is described at a high level, but no explicit account is given of global-phase conventions or consistent boost/reference-frame definitions across three or more legs. This is load-bearing for the multipartite claim, as relative phases directly affect off-diagonal elements used in negativity or concurrence for ttt and tttt.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of phase and frame conventions is necessary to support the multipartite results. MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computes helicity amplitudes with a fixed global-phase convention based on standard spinor and polarization-vector choices (consistent with the conventions in the MadGraph literature and the HELAS library). For processes with three or more final-state legs, all momenta are defined in a common lab frame, and boosts to individual particle rest frames are performed using the same Lorentz-transformation routines, preserving relative phases between helicity configurations. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 that spells out these conventions, includes a brief derivation of how the overall phase cancels in the density-matrix construction, and provides a worked example for a three-particle final state. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 5] Section 5 (applications): the new results for ttt and tttt are presented without an independent cross-check (e.g., comparison to a manually computed toy case or symbolic verification of a small subset of matrix elements). Validation is confined to two-particle systems (ttbar, VV) where external benchmarks exist; extending the same code path to three- and four-particle states therefore rests on untested assumptions about the automation layer.

    Authors: We acknowledge that external analytic benchmarks for three- and four-particle spin-density matrices do not exist in the literature. The matrix-assembly algorithm itself is number-of-particles agnostic and was validated on two-body processes against known results. For the new applications we have added internal consistency tests (trace normalisation, hermiticity, and positive-semidefiniteness of the extracted matrices) that are reported in the revised Section 5. In addition, we now include a comparison against a manually computed toy model with a restricted set of helicity states, where the density-matrix elements agree to within numerical precision. While a complete symbolic verification of the full ttt and tttt processes is impractical, these checks address the core concern about the automation layer. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: automated assembly of helicity amplitudes into density matrices validated on external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper presents a software implementation that takes existing MadGraph helicity amplitudes as input and assembles them into standard production spin-density matrices using the conventional definition ρ ∝ ∑ A_λ A^*_λ'. This assembly is the direct computational realization of the quantum-mechanical definition rather than a derived prediction. Validation is performed against independently known results for ttbar and VV processes, with no fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs. The contribution is the automation layer and analysis library, which remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the existing MadGraph helicity-amplitude infrastructure and standard definitions of quantum-information measures such as concurrence, negativity, and Peres-Horodecki criteria.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Tree-level perturbation theory suffices for the processes under study.
    The abstract explicitly limits the implementation to tree level.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5788 in / 1344 out tokens · 64471 ms · 2026-05-18T05:55:11.094594+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Energetic radiation induces decoherence that significantly reduces entanglement in fermion pairs at colliders, with statistically significant signals observable in ttbar(g) at the LHC and tau pairs at Belle II.

  2. Disentangling new physics with quantum entanglement in $t\bar{t}$ production at future lepton colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Entanglement in ttbar production at lepton colliders is typically reduced by scalar mediators but shows sizable deviations in U(1)B-L and Randall-Sundrum models, positioning quantum-information observables as probes f...

  3. Quantum Tomography and Entanglement in Semi-Leptonic $h\to VV^*$ Decays at Higher Orders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Semi-leptonic h to VV* decays retain an effective two-qutrit description for quantum tomography and entanglement after including finite fermion masses and NLO corrections.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 145 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Afik and J.R.M.n

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907, [2003.02280]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo,Testing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 161801, [2102.11883]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Severi, C.D.E

    C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli,Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 285, [2110.10112]. – 62 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Severi and E

    C. Severi and E. Vryonidou,Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,JHEP01(2023) 148, [2210.09330]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055007, [2203.05619]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Afik and J.R.M.n

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD,Quantum6 (2022) 820, [2203.05582]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas,Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 666, [2205.00542]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Afik and J.R.M.n

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801, [2209.03969]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipartite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116005, [2311.09166]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    T. Han, M. Low and T. A. Wu,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi-leptonic top decays,JHEP07(2024) 192, [2310.17696]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Z. Dong, D. Gonçalves, K. Kong and A. Navarro,Entanglement and Bell inequalities with boosted tt¯,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115023, [2305.07075]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing Entanglement and Bell Inequality Violation in Top Anti-Top Events,2407.01672

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt¯tentanglement,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 096027, [2401.10988]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Decay of entangled fermion pairs with post-selection,Phys. Lett. B 848(2024) 138409, [2308.07412]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas,Entanglement Autodistillation from Particle Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111801, [2401.06854]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Quantum Tomography at Colliders: With or Without Decays, 2410.08303

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Full quantum tomography of top quark decays,Phys. Lett. B855 (2024) 138849, [2402.14725]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring quantum discord at the LHC,JHEP05 (2025) 081, [2412.21158]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099, [2401.08751]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders, JHEP09(2024) 001, [2404.08049]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Probing new physics in the top sector using quantum information,

    R. Aoude, H. Banks, C. D. White and M. J. White,Probing new physics in the top sector using quantum information,2505.12522

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and L. Marzola,Local vs. nonlocal entanglement in top-quark pairs at the LHC,2505.02902. – 63 –

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and K. Sakurai,Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ- at future lepton colliders,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 093002, [2211.10513]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and E. Gabrielli,Constraining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 162, [2208.11723]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Ehat¨ aht, M

    K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken,Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 032005, [2311.17555]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Fabbrichesi and L

    M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola,Dipole momenta and compositeness of theτlepton at Belle II, 2401.04449

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Fabbrichesi and L

    M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola,Quantum tomography withτleptons at the FCC-ee: Entanglement, Bell inequality violation, sinθW, and anomalous couplings,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 076004, [2405.09201]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in $\tau^+ \tau^-$ at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction

    Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, S. Li, S.-C. Hsu, T. Han et al.,Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality inτ +τ − at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction, 2504.01496

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality inτ+τ − at the BEPC, 2501.04801

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    N. A. Tornqvist,Suggestion for Einstein-podolsky-rosen Experiments Using Reactions Like e+e− →Λ ¯Λ→π −pπ+¯p,Found. Phys.11(1981) 171–177

    work page 1981

  31. [31]

    R. A. Bertlmann and W. Grimus,A Model for decoherence of entangled beauty,Phys. Rev. D 64(2001) 056004, [hep-ph/0101160]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    Takubo, T

    Y. Takubo, T. Ichikawa, S. Higashino, Y. Mori, K. Nagano and I. Tsutsui,Feasibility of Bell inequality violation at the ATLAS experiment with flavor entanglement of B0B¯0 pairs from pp collisions,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 056004, [2106.07399]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    W. Gong, G. Parida, Z. Tu and R. Venugopalan,Measurement of Bell-type inequalities and quantum entanglement fromΛ-hyperon spin correlations at high energy colliders,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) L031501, [2107.13007]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequality is violated in B0→J/ψK*(892)0 decays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L031104, [2305.04982]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    Gabrielli and L

    E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Entanglement and Bell Inequality Violation in B→ϕϕDecays, Symmetry16(2024) 1036, [2408.05010]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequality is violated in charmonium decays,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 053008, [2406.17772]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    Cheng and B

    K. Cheng and B. Yan,Bell Inequality Violation of Light Quarks in Back-to-Back Dihadron Pair Production at Lepton Colliders,2501.03321

    work page arXiv

  38. [39]

    Chen, Z.-P

    K. Chen, Z.-P. Xing and R. Zhu,Test of Bell Locality Violation in Flavor Entangled Neutral Meson Pair,2407.19242. – 64 –

    work page arXiv

  39. [40]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum pions,2506.05464

    work page arXiv

  40. [41]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang and Y.-G. Yang,Quantum steering and discord in hyperon-antihyperon system in electron-positron annihilation,2509.14990

    work page arXiv

  41. [42]

    Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J. R. M. de Nova, A. Soffer and D. Uzan,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L111902, [2406.04402]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    A. J. Barr,Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs boson decays,Phys. Lett. B825(2022) 136866, [2106.01377]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [44]

    A. J. Barr, P. Caban and J. Rembieliński,Bell-type inequalities for systems of relativistic vector bosons,Quantum7(2023) 1070, [2204.11063]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Ashby-Pickering, A

    R. Ashby-Pickering, A. J. Barr and A. Wierzchucka,Quantum state tomography, entanglement detection and Bell violation prospects in weak decays of massive particles,JHEP05(2023) 020, [2209.13990]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [46]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J. A. Casas and J. M. Moreno,Testing entanglement and Bell inequalities in H→ZZ,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016012, [2209.13441]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [47]

    R. A. Morales,Exploring Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in vector boson scattering,Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) 1157, [2306.17247]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [48]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 076025, [2307.06991]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [49]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production,JHEP12(2023) 017, [2307.09675]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 823, [2302.00683]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [51]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Stringent bounds on HWW and HZZ anomalous couplings with quantum tomography at the LHC,JHEP09(2023) 195, [2304.02403]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [52]

    Subba, R

    A. Subba, R. K. Singh and R. M. Godbole,Looking into the quantum entanglement in H→ZZ ⋆ at LHC within SMEFT framework,2411.19171

    work page arXiv

  52. [53]

    Bernal, P

    A. Bernal, P. Caban and J. Rembieliński,Entanglement and Bell inequality violation in vector diboson systems produced in decays of spin-0 particles,2405.16525

    work page arXiv

  53. [54]

    Constraining New Physics withh→V VTomography,

    M. Sullivan,Constraining New Physics withh→V VTomography,2410.10980

    work page arXiv

  54. [55]

    Bi, Q.-H

    Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng and H. Zhang,New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036022, [2307.14895]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [56]

    Bernal, P

    A. Bernal, P. Caban and J. Rembieliński,Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation in H→ZZwith anomalous coupling,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1050, [2307.13496]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Fabbri, J

    F. Fabbri, J. Howarth and T. Maurin,Isolating semi-leptonicH→W W ∗decays for Bell inequality tests,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 20, [2307.13783]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [58]

    Grossi, G

    M. Grossi, G. Pelliccioli and A. Vicini,From angular coefficients to quantum observables: a phenomenological appraisal in di-boson systems,2409.16731. – 65 –

    work page arXiv

  58. [59]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,H→ZZas a double-slit experiment,2411.13464

    work page arXiv

  59. [60]

    Y. Wu, R. Jiang, A. Ruzi, Y. Ban, X. Yan and Q. Li,Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at CEPC,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 036008, [2410.17025]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [61]

    A. Ruzi, Y. Wu, R. Ding, S. Qian, A. M. Levin and Q. Li,Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at a muon collider,JHEP10(2024) 211, [2408.05429]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    R. Ding, A. Ruzi, S. Qian, A. Levin, Y. Wu and Q. Li,Quantum Entanglement between gauge boson pairs at a Muon Collider,2504.09832

    work page arXiv

  62. [63]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum contextuality of spin-1 massive particles,Phys. Rev. A112(2025) L020402, [2503.14587]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    Quantum properties of H→VV ∗: precise predictions in the SM and sensitivity to new physics,

    M. Del Gratta, F. Fabbri, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni and D. Pagani,Quantum properties of H→V V ∗: precise predictions in the SM and sensitivity to new physics,2504.03841

    work page arXiv

  64. [65]

    Decoherence effects in entangled fermion pairs at colliders

    R. Aoude, A. J. Barr, F. Maltoni and L. Satrioni,Decoherence effects in entangled fermion pairs at colliders,2504.07030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Quantum tomography beyond the leading order,2505.11870

    work page arXiv

  66. [67]

    Gonçalves, A

    D. Gonçalves, A. Kaladharan, F. Krauss and A. Navarro,Quantum Entanglement is Quantum: ZZ Production at the LHC,2505.12125

    work page arXiv

  67. [68]

    Z-boson quantum tomography at next-to-leading order,

    M. Del Gratta, F. Fabbri, M. Grossi, F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, G. Pelliccioli et al.,Z-boson quantum tomography at next-to-leading order,2509.20456

    work page arXiv

  68. [69]

    Gu, S.-J

    J. Gu, S.-J. Lin, D. Y. Shao, L.-T. Wang and S.-X. Yang,Decoherence in high energy collisions as renormalization group flow,2510.13951

    work page arXiv

  69. [70]

    Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory

    S. Hollands and K. Sanders,Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory,1702.04924

    work page arXiv

  70. [71]

    Jozsa,Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States,J

    R. Jozsa,Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States,J. Mod. Opt.41(1994) 2315–2323

    work page 1994

  71. [72]

    M. B. Plenio,Logarithmic negativity: A full entanglement monotone that is not convex,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(Aug, 2005) 090503

    work page 2005

  72. [73]

    Introducing Quantum Discord

    H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek,Introducing Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2001) 017901, [quant-ph/0105072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [74]

    Mintert, M

    F. Mintert, M. KuÅŻ and A. Buchleitner,Concurrence of mixed multipartite quantum states, Physical Review Letters95(Dec., 2005)

    work page 2005

  74. [75]

    Mintert and A

    F. Mintert and A. Buchleitner,Observable entanglement measure for mixed quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.98(Apr, 2007) 140505

    work page 2007

  75. [76]

    Mintert and A

    F. Mintert and A. Buchleitner,Observable entanglement measure for mixed quantum states, Physical Review Letters98(Apr., 2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [77]

    A computable measure of entanglement

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner,Computable measure of entanglement,Phys. Rev. A65(2002) 032314, [quant-ph/0102117]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  77. [78]

    C. D. White and M. J. White,Magic states of top quarks,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 116016, [2406.07321]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [79]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and L. Marzola,About testing Bell locality at colliders, 2503.18535. – 66 –

    work page arXiv

  79. [80]

    Fabbrichesi, M

    M. Fabbrichesi, M. Low and L. Marzola,Trace distance between density matrices: A nifty tool in new-physics searches,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 013003, [2501.03311]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [81]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Tests of quantum contextuality in particle physics,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 033005, [2504.12382]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.