arxiv: 2510.19313 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity in the presence of loop-current fluctuations

Zenghui Fan , Runyu Ma , Stefano Chesi , Congjun Wu , Tianxing Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 05:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

keywords loop currentstime-reversal symmetry breakingsuperconductivitybilayer modelhole dopingquantum Monte Carlophase diagraminterlayer interactions

0 comments

The pith

In a bilayer model, hole doping suppresses loop-current order and induces interlayer s-wave superconductivity with time-reversal symmetry breaking near the phase boundary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a bilayer t-J_perp-V model hosts a spontaneous interlayer loop-current state near half-filling that breaks time-reversal symmetry. Upon hole doping this order is suppressed while interlayer s-wave superconductivity appears, with loop-current fluctuations becoming dominant. A coexistence window opens near the transition, producing a superconducting state that itself breaks time-reversal symmetry. The resulting phase diagram parallels the antiferromagnetic-to-superconducting evolution in cuprates but replaces the magnetic parent with loop currents. These results identify loop-current fluctuations as a concrete driver for time-reversal symmetry breaking in superconductors.

Core claim

In the bilayer t-J⊥-V model, unbiased interlayer interactions induce spontaneous loop currents near half-filling that break time-reversal symmetry. Upon hole doping the loop-current order is suppressed and interlayer s-wave superconductivity emerges in the regime where loop-current fluctuations dominate. Near the phase boundary a coexisting regime appears that yields time-reversal-symmetry-breaking superconductivity.

What carries the argument

Spontaneous interlayer loop-current order whose fluctuations upon hole doping drive interlayer s-wave superconductivity and a time-reversal-symmetry-breaking coexistence phase, simulated via projector quantum Monte Carlo.

If this is right

The phase diagram shows a direct transition from loop-current order to interlayer s-wave superconductivity upon hole doping.
Loop-current fluctuations become dominant precisely in the superconducting regime.
A coexistence region near the boundary produces superconductivity that breaks time-reversal symmetry.
The setup supplies a minimal framework for time-reversal symmetry breaking in bilayer correlated electron systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same fluctuation mechanism could be tested in real bilayer materials by searching for coexisting loop-current and superconducting order near half-filling.
The cuprate analogy suggests that loop currents may play a parent-state role in other unconventional superconductors.
Varying the interlayer coupling strength in related models would likely shift the location of the coexistence window.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen interlayer interactions in the bilayer t-J⊥-V model are assumed to generate a spontaneous loop-current parent state near half-filling whose fluctuations then produce the reported superconducting phases upon doping.

What would settle it

Absence of a coexistence window with time-reversal symmetry breaking in the superconducting state when the same model is simulated at higher doping or with modified interlayer couplings would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.19313 by Congjun Wu, Runyu Ma, Stefano Chesi, Tianxing Ma, Zenghui Fan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. The structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The structure factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. The structure factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. The AFM structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The intralayer s-wave and d-wave pairing almost maintain independent on doping x and interlayer repulsion V with small ξ values within our parameter range. For both V = 0 and V = 0.3, the ξ of interlayer s-wave pairing far exceeds the intralayer two, exhibiting a robust dominance of SC pairing in this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Loop currents have been proposed in various superconductors and recently confirmed in kagome materials, raising a fundamental question regarding their intrinsic connection to superconductivity. Here, we study a sign-problem-free bilayer $t-J_{\perp}-V$ model hosting a spontaneous interlayer loop-current parent state, and explore the interplay between loop-current fluctuations and superconductivity using unbiased projector quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Near half-filling, unbiased interlayer interactions induce spontaneous loop currents that break time-reversal symmetry. Upon hole doping, the loop-current order is suppressed, and interlayer $s$-wave superconductivity emerges where loop-current fluctuations become dominant. We establish a phase diagram revealing a transition from the loop-current parent to a superconducting state, reminiscent of the evolution from an antiferromagnetic parent to superconductivity in cuprates. Strikingly, a coexisting regime emerges near the phase boundary, yielding time-reversal-symmetry-breaking superconductivity. Our study reveals an intrinsic connection between loop currents and superconductivity, and identifies a promising mechanism for time-reversal symmetry breaking in superconductors. Furthermore, our results offer insights into unconventional superconductivity in loop-current systems and establish a minimal theoretical framework for understanding time-reversal symmetry breaking in bilayer correlated electron systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses sign-problem-free projector QMC on a tailored bilayer t-J_perp-V model to show loop-current order near half filling giving way to s-wave superconductivity with a TRS-breaking coexistence window upon doping.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work uses projector quantum Monte Carlo on a sign-problem-free bilayer t-J_perp-V model to map out how loop-current order near half-filling gives way to interlayer s-wave superconductivity upon hole doping, with a coexistence region that breaks time-reversal symmetry. The numerics are the strength here. Because the model is built to avoid the sign problem, the simulations stay unbiased and give a direct look at the suppression of loop-current order with doping and the rise of pairing where fluctuations dominate. The phase diagram they draw, with its parallel to the cuprate antiferromagnet-to-superconductor evolution, is a clean numerical result that connects loop currents to the superconducting state in a controlled way. What is new is the identification of that coexisting regime near the boundary where both orders sit together and produce time-reversal symmetry breaking. The abstract presents this as an intrinsic link, and the numerical approach makes the claim more concrete than mean-field or perturbative arguments in similar models. The soft spot is the modeling choice. The interlayer V interaction is selected to produce the spontaneous loop-current parent state at zero doping, exactly as the stress-test note flags. This is not derived from a more microscopic starting point, so the location of the transition and the width of the coexistence window could move if V or J_perp is changed even modestly. Full details on system sizes, finite-size scaling, and error analysis would help judge how robust the reported boundary is. This paper is for condensed-matter theorists who work on numerical studies of correlated superconductivity, especially in bilayer or kagome settings where loop currents appear in experiments. Readers who want a concrete example of fluctuation-driven TRS breaking will find the phase diagram useful. It deserves a serious referee because the method is appropriate and the question is timely. I would send it to peer review and ask the referees to check the sensitivity of the coexistence region to the interlayer parameters.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a sign-problem-free bilayer t-J⊥-V model that hosts a spontaneous interlayer loop-current parent state near half-filling. Using projector quantum Monte Carlo simulations, the authors map the evolution upon hole doping: loop-current order is suppressed while interlayer s-wave superconductivity emerges in regions where loop-current fluctuations dominate. A coexistence window near the phase boundary produces time-reversal-symmetry-breaking superconductivity. The work draws an analogy to the antiferromagnetic parent state in cuprates and proposes a minimal framework for TRS-breaking superconductivity in loop-current systems.

Significance. If the central results are robust, the paper supplies a concrete, simulable minimal model linking loop-current fluctuations to TRS-breaking superconductivity without sign problems. The use of unbiased projector QMC on a sign-problem-free Hamiltonian is a clear technical strength, as is the identification of a doping-driven transition and coexistence regime that parallels cuprate phenomenology. The findings could inform interpretations of recent kagome superconductor experiments and motivate further studies of bilayer correlated systems.

major comments (2)

[Hamiltonian definition and phase-diagram construction] The interlayer V term (and the specific form of the interlayer interactions) is introduced to stabilize spontaneous loop-current order at δ=0. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the reported suppression of loop-current order, the emergence of dominant fluctuations, or the coexistence window with TRS-breaking s-wave superconductivity survive modest variations in V or J⊥, nor does it compare against alternative interlayer couplings. Because the parent state and its doping evolution rest on this modeling choice, the central claims require explicit robustness checks or a clearer microscopic motivation for the chosen parameters.
[Methods and numerical results] The abstract and results sections assert that the simulations are unbiased and sign-problem-free, yet the manuscript provides limited detail on system sizes, boundary conditions, error analysis, and the precise criteria used to locate the coexistence region. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether finite-size effects or post-hoc parameter tuning influence the reported phase boundaries.

minor comments (2)

[Model section] Notation for the interlayer couplings (J⊥ versus V) should be defined once at first use and used consistently throughout the text and figures.
[Figure captions] Figure captions for the phase diagram should explicitly state the system sizes and the observable used to identify the coexistence window.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Hamiltonian definition and phase-diagram construction] The interlayer V term (and the specific form of the interlayer interactions) is introduced to stabilize spontaneous loop-current order at δ=0. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the reported suppression of loop-current order, the emergence of dominant fluctuations, or the coexistence window with TRS-breaking s-wave superconductivity survive modest variations in V or J⊥, nor does it compare against alternative interlayer couplings. Because the parent state and its doping evolution rest on this modeling choice, the central claims require explicit robustness checks or a clearer microscopic motivation for the chosen parameters.

Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness to parameter variations strengthens the central claims. The specific form of the interlayer V term is chosen as the minimal interaction that stabilizes spontaneous loop-current order at half-filling while preserving the sign-problem-free property of the model, motivated by the bilayer geometry and the desire to isolate the effects of loop-current fluctuations. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection with additional projector QMC data for modest variations in V and J⊥ (e.g., ±10–20% around the reported values) to show that the suppression of loop-current order, the emergence of dominant fluctuations, and the coexistence window remain qualitatively intact. We will also expand the introduction and model section to provide a clearer microscopic motivation for the chosen interlayer couplings, drawing on the bilayer t-J framework and its connection to cuprate phenomenology. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods and numerical results] The abstract and results sections assert that the simulations are unbiased and sign-problem-free, yet the manuscript provides limited detail on system sizes, boundary conditions, error analysis, and the precise criteria used to locate the coexistence region. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether finite-size effects or post-hoc parameter tuning influence the reported phase boundaries.

Authors: We acknowledge that the technical details of the simulations were summarized rather than fully specified. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods section to include: (i) the range of system sizes employed (linear dimensions up to L=12 with periodic boundary conditions in the plane), (ii) the error analysis procedure (jackknife resampling of the Monte Carlo data), and (iii) the precise criteria used to locate the phase boundaries and coexistence window (e.g., crossings of the loop-current structure factor and superconducting susceptibility, supplemented by finite-size scaling of the order parameters). These additions will allow readers to evaluate finite-size effects and the reliability of the reported transitions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results emerge from direct QMC simulation of an explicitly defined Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The paper defines a bilayer t-J⊥-V model upfront and obtains all central claims (suppression of loop-current order upon hole doping, emergence of interlayer s-wave superconductivity, fluctuation dominance, and TRS-breaking coexistence near the phase boundary) via unbiased projector quantum Monte Carlo simulations. No analytical derivation chain exists that reduces predictions to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The model is chosen to host the parent state, but the reported phase diagram and transitions are numerical outputs, not tautological. This qualifies as a self-contained numerical study against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the definition of the bilayer t-J⊥-V Hamiltonian and the numerical reliability of projector QMC for that Hamiltonian; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)

interlayer interaction strengths J_perp and V
These parameters are chosen so that the model hosts a spontaneous interlayer loop-current state near half-filling; their specific values are not derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The chosen bilayer t-J⊥-V model is sign-problem-free and projector QMC yields unbiased ground-state properties.
Invoked in the abstract to justify the use of unbiased simulations for the phase diagram.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1401 out tokens · 41196 ms · 2026-05-18T05:10:51.922549+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The t−J⊥−V Hamiltonian ... J⊥Xi Si,c·Si,d + VXi(ni,c−1)(ni,d−1)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

phase diagram ... transition from the loop-current parent to a superconducting state

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Bednorz and K

J. Bednorz and K. Muller, Possible high-T c superconduc- tivity in the ba-la-cu-o system, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter64, 189 (1986)

work page 1986
[2]

Kamihara, T

Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron-based layered superconductor la[o 1−xfx]feas (x=0.05-0.12) with t c=26 k, J. Am. Chem. Soc.130, 3296 (2008). 6

work page 2008
[3]

Jerome, A

D. Jerome, A. Mazaud, M. Ribault, and K. Bech- gaard, Superconductivity in a synthetic organic conduc- tor (tmtsf)2pf6, J. Physique Lett.41, 95 (1980)

work page 1980
[4]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493–498 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Nakatsuji, K

S. Nakatsuji, K. Kuga, Y. Machida, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, Y. Karaki, H. Ishimoto, S. Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, E. Pearson, G. G. Lonzarich, L. Balicas, H. Lee, and Z. Fisk, Superconductivity and quantum crit- icality in the heavy-fermion systemβ-YbAlB4, Nature Phys4, 603 (2008)

work page 2008
[6]

Matsubayashi, T

K. Matsubayashi, T. Tanaka, A. Sakai, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Kubo, and Y. Uwatoko, Pressure-induced heavy fermion superconductivity in the nonmagnetic quadrupo- lar system PrTi 2Al20, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 187004 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Sakai, Y

A. Sakai, Y. Matsumoto, M. Fu, T. Isomae, M. Tsu- jimoto, E. O’Farrell, D. Nishio-Hamane, and S. Nakat- suji, Interplay between multipolar order and multipole- induced superconductivity in PrTi 2Al20, Nat Commun 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-57262-2 (2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57262-2 2025
[8]

Keimer, S

B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, NATURE518, 179 (2015)

work page 2015
[9]

Chang, E

J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Chris- tensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. von Zimmermann, E. M. For- gan, and S. M. Hayden, Direct observation of competi- tion between superconductivity and charge density wave order in yba2cu3o6.67, Nature Phys8, 871 (2012)

work page 2012
[10]

L. J. Li, E. C. T. O’Farrell, K. P. Loh, G. Eda, B. Ozy- ilmaz, and A. H. C. Neto, Controlling many-body states by the electric-field effect in a two-dimensional material, Nature529, 185–189 (2016)

work page 2016
[11]

J. Dong, H. J. Zhang, G. Xu, Z. Li, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, D. Wu, G. F. Chen, X. Dai, J. L. Luo, Z. Fang, and N. L. Wang, Competing orders and spin-density-wave in- stability in la(o1-xfx)feas, Europhysics Letters83, 27006 (2008)

work page 2008
[12]

Corboz, T

P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing states in thet-jmodel: Uniformd-wave state versus stripe state, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 046402 (2014)

work page 2014
[13]

Zheng, C.-M

B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Science358, 1155 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Mielke, D

C. Mielke, D. Das, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y.- X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superconductor, Nature602, 245–250 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

C. Guo, C. Putzke, S. Konyzheva, X. Huang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, D. Chen, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Switchable chiral transport in charge-ordered kagome metal CsV3Sb5, Nature611, 461–466 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Q. Wu, Z. X. Wang, Q. M. Liu, R. S. Li, S. X. Xu, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, H. C. Lei, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Simultaneous formation of two-fold rotation sym- metry with charge order in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5 by optical polarization rotation measurement, Phys. Rev. B106, 205109 (2022)

work page 2022
[17]

Y. Xu, Z. Ni, Y. Liu, B. R. Ortiz, Q. Deng, S. D. Wil- son, B. Yan, L. Balents, and L. Wu, Three-state nematic- ity and magneto-optical kerr effect in the charge density waves in kagome superconductors, Nature physics18, 1470 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Y. Xing, S. Bae, E. Ritz, F. Yang, T. Birol, A. N. C. Sali- nas, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Z. Wang, R. M. Fernandes, and V. Madhavan, Optical manipulation of the charge density wave state in RbV3Sb5 (2024), arXiv:2308.04128 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Bohm, Note on a theorem of bloch concerning possible causes of superconductivity, Phys

D. Bohm, Note on a theorem of bloch concerning possible causes of superconductivity, Phys. Rev.75, 502 (1949)

work page 1949
[20]

Ohashi and T

Y. Ohashi and T. Momoi, On the bloch theo- rem concerning spontaneous electric current, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan65, 3254 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.65.3254

work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.65.3254 1996
[21]

Watanabe, Bloch theorem in the presence of an ad- ditional conserved charge, Phys

H. Watanabe, Bloch theorem in the presence of an ad- ditional conserved charge, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013043 (2022)

work page 2022
[22]

C. M. Varma, Non-fermi-liquid states and pairing insta- bility of a general model of copper oxide metals, Phys. Rev. B55, 14554 (1997)

work page 1997
[23]

M. E. Simon and C. M. Varma, Symmetry considera- tions for the detection of second-harmonic generation in cuprates in the pseudogap phase, Phys. Rev. B67, 054511 (2003)

work page 2003
[24]

C. M. Varma, Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B73, 155113 (2006)

work page 2006
[25]

L. Zhu, V. Aji, and C. M. Varma, Ordered loop cur- rent states in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B87, 035427 (2013)

work page 2013
[26]

Bultinck, E

N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vish- wanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer fill- ing, Phys. Rev. X10, 031034 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

S. Han, L. Li, C. S. Tang, Q. Wang, L. Zhang, C. Diao, M. Zhao, S. Sun, L. Tian, M. B. H. Breese, C. Cai, M. V. Milosevic, Y. Qi, A. T. S. Wee, and X. Yin, Orbital ori- gin of magnetic moment enhancement induced by charge density wave in kagome FeGe (2024), arXiv:2407.01076 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

V. Aji, A. Shekhter, and C. M. Varma, Theory of the coupling of quantum-critical fluctuations to fermions and d-wave superconductivity in cuprates, Phys. Rev. B81, 064515 (2010)

work page 2010
[29]

Fauqu´ e, Y

B. Fauqu´ e, Y. Sidis, V. Hinkov, S. Pailh` es, C. T. Lin, X. Chaud, and P. Bourges, Magnetic order in the pseudo- gap phase of high-T C superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 197001 (2006)

work page 2006
[30]

H. A. Mook, Y. Sidis, B. Fauqu´ e, V. Bal´ edent, and P. Bourges, Observation of magnetic order in a supercon- ducting yba 2cu3o6.6 single crystal using polarized neu- tron scattering, Phys. Rev. B78, 020506 (2008)

work page 2008
[31]

Y. Li, V. Bal´ edent, N. Bariˇ si´ c, Y. Cho, B. Fauqu´ e, Y. Sidis, G. Yu, X. Zhao, P. Bourges, and M. Greven, Unusual magnetic order in the pseudogap region of the superconductor HgBa 2CuO4+δ, Nature455, 372 (2008)

work page 2008
[32]

Y. Li, V. Bal´ edent, G. Yu, N. Bariˇ si´ c, K. Hradil, R. A. Mole, Y. Sidis, P. Steffens, X. Zhao, P. Bourges,et al., 7 Hidden magnetic excitation in the pseudogap phase of a high-TC superconductor, Nature468, 283 (2010)

work page 2010
[33]

Bourges, D

P. Bourges, D. Bounoua, and Y. Sidis, Loop currents in quantum matter, Comptes Rendus. Physique22, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[34]

A. M. Mounce, S. Oh, J. A. Lee, W. P. Halperin, A. P. Reyes, P. L. Kuhns, M. K. Chan, C. Dorow, L. Ji, D. Xia, X. Zhao, and M. Greven, Absence of static loop-current magnetism at the apical oxygen site in HgBa 2CuO4+δ from nmr, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 187003 (2013)

work page 2013
[35]

T. Wu, H. Mayaffre, S. Kr¨ amer, M. Horvati´ c, C. Berthier, W. Hardy, R. Liang, D. Bonn, and M.-H. Julien, Incipi- ent charge order observed by nmr in the normal state of YBa2Cu3Oy, Nature communications6, 6438 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

Gheidi, K

S. Gheidi, K. Akintola, A. C. Y. Fang, S. Sundar, A. M. Cˆ ot´ e, S. R. Dunsiger, G. D. Gu, and J. E. Sonier, Ab- sence ofµSR evidence for magnetic order in the pseudo- gap phase of Bi 2+xSr2−xCaCu2O8+δ, Phys. Rev. B101, 184511 (2020)

work page 2020
[37]

Z. H. Zhu, J. Zhang, Z. F. Ding, C. Tan, C. S. Chen, Q. Wu, Y. X. Yang, O. O. Bernal, P.-C. Ho, G. D. Mor- ris, A. Koda, A. D. Hillier, S. P. Cottrell, P. J. Baker, P. K. Biswas, J. Qian, X. Yao, D. E. MacLaughlin, and L. Shu, Muon spin relaxation and fluctuating magnetism in the pseudogap phase of YBa 2Cu3Oy, Phys. Rev. B 103, 134426 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Palle, R

G. Palle, R. Ojaj¨ arvi, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Schmalian, Superconductivity due to fluctuating loop currents, Sci- ence Advances10, eadn3662 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

H. Taya, Y. Takatsu, and H. Koizumi, Toward the detec- tion of spin-vortex-induced loop currents in a single bi- layer Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ thin film and their possible use as qubits: Model calculations for three nano-island ar- chitecture, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Mag- netism38, 132 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Wang, G.-Q

X.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Luo, J.-Y. Liu, G.-H. Huang, Z.-X. Li, C. Wu, A. Hemmerich, and Z.-F. Xu, Evidence for quantum stripe ordering in a triangular optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 226001 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Kontani, R

H. Kontani, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and S. Onari, Un- conventional density waves and superconductivities in fe- based superconductors and other strongly correlated elec- tron systems, Advances in Physics70, 355 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

Q.-F. Li, G. Pan, X. Zhang, S. Nakatsuji, W. Jiang, X. Y. Xu, and X. Wu, Loop-current fluctuations mediated chi- ral d-wave pairing in kagome lattice, Chinese Physics Let- ters42, 057302 (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

R.-Q. Fu, J. Zhan, M. D¨ urrnagel, H. Hohmann, R. Thomale, J. Hu, Z. Wang, S. Zhou, and X. Wu, Ex- otic charge density waves and superconductivity on the kagome lattice (2024), arXiv:2405.09451 [cond-mat.str- el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[44]

J. Zhan, H. Hohmann, M. D¨ urrnagel, R. Fu, S. Zhou, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Loop cur- rent order on the kagome lattice (2025), arXiv:2506.01648 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Capponi, C

S. Capponi, C. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Current carrying ground state in a bilayer model of strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B70, 220505 (2004)

work page 2004
[46]

Y. Shen, M. Qin, and G.-M. Zhang, Effective bi-layer model hamiltonian and density-matrix renormalization group study for the high-Tc superconductivity in la3ni2o7 under high pressure, Chinese Phys. Lett.40, 127401 (2023)

work page 2023
[47]

Yang, G.-M

Y.-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc su- perconductivity of la3ni2o7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201108 (2023)

work page 2023
[48]

Qu, D.-W

X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Bilayert−J−J ⊥ model and magnetically me- diated pairing in the pressurized nickelate la3ni2o7, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036502 (2024)

work page 2024
[49]

C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer-coupling- driven high-temperature superconductivity in la 3ni2o7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146002 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

Assaad and H

F. Assaad and H. Evertz, World-line and determinan- tal quantum monte carlo methods for spins, phonons and electrons, inComputational Many-Particle Physics, edited by H. Fehske, R. Schneider, and A. Weiße (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 277–356

work page 2008
[51]

J. E. Hirsch, Two-dimensional hubbard model: Numeri- cal simulation study, Phys. Rev. B31, 4403 (1985)

work page 1985
[52]

T. Ma, D. Wang, and C. Wu, Doping-driven antifer- romagnetic insulator-superconductor transition: a quan- tum monte carlo study, Phys. Rev. B106, 054510 (2022)

work page 2022
[53]

Ma and T

R. Ma and T. Ma, Competition between antiferromag- netism and superconductivity in a doped hubbard model with anisotropic interaction, Phys. Rev. B107, 214509 (2023)

work page 2023
[54]

Wu, J.-p

C. Wu, J.-p. Hu, and S.-c. Zhang, Exact so(5) symmetry in the spin-3/2 fermionic system, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 186402 (2003)

work page 2003
[55]

WU, Hidden symmetry and quantum phases in spin- 3/2 cold atomic systems, Modern Physics Letters B20, 1707 (2006)

C. WU, Hidden symmetry and quantum phases in spin- 3/2 cold atomic systems, Modern Physics Letters B20, 1707 (2006)

work page 2006
[56]

Troyer and U.-J

M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 170201 (2005)

work page 2005
[57]

Wu and S.-C

C. Wu and S.-C. Zhang, Sufficient condition for absence of the sign problem in the fermionic quantum monte carlo algorithm, Phys. Rev. B71, 155115 (2005)

work page 2005
[58]

Parisen Toldin, M

F. Parisen Toldin, M. Hohenadler, F. F. Assaad, and I. F. Herbut, Fermionic quantum criticality in honey- comb andπ-flux hubbard models: Finite-size scaling of renormalization-group-invariant observables from quan- tum monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B91, 165108 (2015)

work page 2015
[59]

Campostrini, A

M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Finite-size scaling at quantum transitions, Phys. Rev. B89, 094516 (2014)

work page 2014
[60]

Weber, A

C. Weber, A. L¨ auchli, F. Mila, and T. Giamarchi, Orbital currents in extended hubbard models of high-T c cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 017005 (2009)

work page 2009
[61]

Kaneko, H

T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations in the two-orbital hubbard ladder: Im- plications for superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate la3ni2o7, Phys. Rev. B109, 045154 (2024)

work page 2024
[62]

F. F. Assaad and I. F. Herbut, Pinning the order: The nature of quantum criticality in the hubbard model on honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. X3, 031010 (2013)

work page 2013
[63]

T. Ma, L. Zhang, C.-C. Chang, H.-H. Hung, and R. T. Scalettar, Localization of interacting dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 116601 (2018)

work page 2018
[64]

Hirthe, T

S. Hirthe, T. Chalopin, D. Bourgund, P. Bojovic, A. Bohrdt, E. Demler, F. Grusdt, I. Bloch, and T. A. Hilker, Magnetically mediated hole pairing in fermionic ladders of ultracold atoms, Nature613, 463 – 467 (2023)

work page 2023
[65]

Bohrdt, L

A. Bohrdt, L. Homeier, I. Bloch, E. Demler, and 8 F. Grusdt, Strong pairing in mixed-dimensional bilayer antiferromagnetic mott insulators, Nat. Phys.18, 651 (2022)

work page 2022
[66]

Lange, L

H. Lange, L. Homeier, E. Demler, U. Schollw¨ ock, F. Grusdt, and A. Bohrdt, Feshbach resonance in a strongly repulsive ladder of mixed dimensionality: A pos- sible scenario for bilayer nickelate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B109, 045127 (2024)

work page 2024
[67]

Lange, L

H. Lange, L. Homeier, E. Demler, U. Schollw¨ ock, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Pairing dome from an emer- gent feshbach resonance in a strongly repulsive bilayer model, Phys. Rev. B110, L081113 (2024)

work page 2024
[68]

Zhou and Z

S. Zhou and Z. Wang, Chern fermi pocket, topological pair density wave, and charge-4e and charge-6e super- conductivity in kagom´ e superconductors, Nature Com- munications13, 7288 (2022). SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIALS S1. The spontaneous ILC and IS-SC characterized in the Momentum Space As sketched in Fig. 1 of the text, the ILC has two fea- sures: staggere...

work page 2022