2D Canonical Approach for Beating the Boltzmann Tyranny Using Memory

Fabian Hartmann; Leonardo K. Castelano; Ovidiu Lipan; Rafael Schio Wengenroth Silva; Soumen Pradhan; Sven H\"ofling; Victor Lopez-Richard

arxiv: 2510.24883 · v2 · pith:4TFXUNKMnew · submitted 2025-10-28 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

2D Canonical Approach for Beating the Boltzmann Tyranny Using Memory

Rafael Schio Wengenroth Silva , Soumen Pradhan , Fabian Hartmann , Leonardo K. Castelano , Ovidiu Lipan , Sven H\"ofling , Victor Lopez-Richard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph

keywords charge trappingsubthreshold swingBoltzmann tyrannyfield-effect transistorsLandauer-Büttiker formalismmemory effectssub-thermal switchingnanometric devices

0 comments

The pith

Charge trapping in nanometric transistors dynamically renormalizes the conduction band edge to achieve sub-60 mV/decade switching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a universal theoretical framework inside the Landauer-Büttiker quantum transport formalism that incorporates intrinsic charge-trapping mechanisms. These mechanisms produce a time-dependent shift in the conduction band edge, which in turn reduces the subthreshold swing below the thermal limit. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a material-agnostic route to lower-power transistors that avoids the fabrication complexities of ferroelectric or tunnel-based alternatives.

Core claim

Within the Landauer-Büttiker formalism, charge-trapping mechanisms dynamically renormalize the conduction band edge; the resulting analytical expression for subthreshold swing explicitly couples memory dynamics to gate efficiency, so that a reduced carrier generation rate or enhanced trapping activity produces sub-thermal switching and thereby breaks the Boltzmann barrier.

What carries the argument

Charge-trapping mechanisms that dynamically renormalize the conduction band edge inside the Landauer-Büttiker quantum transport formalism.

If this is right

Subthreshold swing becomes tunable through trapping strength and carrier generation rate rather than fixed by temperature.
The same formalism supplies concrete design rules for choosing trap density and gate coupling to reach target swing values.
Memory-assisted operation emerges as a general route to ultra-low-power and multifunctional transistor architectures.
The model reproduces several reported experimental signatures of sub-thermal switching in small devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The framework could be extended to predict how trap engineering in specific 2D channel materials alters the required trapping rate.
If the renormalized band edge picture holds, similar memory effects might appear in other nanodevices whose transport is described by Landauer-Büttiker scattering theory.
Circuit-level simulations that include the derived swing expression would quantify the power savings achievable at the system scale.

Load-bearing premise

Incorporating charge-trapping into the Landauer-Büttiker formalism yields a dynamically renormalized conduction band edge whose effect on subthreshold swing is captured by a simple analytical expression without additional scattering or non-equilibrium effects invalidating the derivation.

What would settle it

Measure the subthreshold swing versus gate voltage in a fabricated nanometric FET while independently varying the charge-trapping rate or carrier generation rate and check whether the swing drops below 60 mV per decade at room temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.24883 by Fabian Hartmann, Leonardo K. Castelano, Ovidiu Lipan, Rafael Schio Wengenroth Silva, Soumen Pradhan, Sven H\"ofling, Victor Lopez-Richard.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Memory-induced phenomena and sub-thermal switch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The 60 mV$/$decade subthreshold limit at room temperature, coined as the Boltzmann tyranny, remains a fundamental obstacle to the continued down-scaling of conventional transistors. While several strategies have sought to overcome this constraint through non-thermal carrier injection, most rely on ferroelectric-based or otherwise material-specific mechanisms that require complex fabrication and stability control. Here, we develop a universal theoretical framework showing that intrinsic memory effects in nanometric field-effect transistors can naturally bypass this limit. Within the Landauer-B\"uttiker quantum transport formalism, we incorporate charge-trapping mechanisms that dynamically renormalize the conduction band edge. The resulting analytical expression for the subthreshold swing explicitly links memory dynamics to gate efficiency, revealing that a reduced carrier generation rate or enhanced trapping activity leads to sub-thermal switching, thus breaking the Boltzmann barrier. The model captures key experimental features and provides clear, generalizable design principles, establishing memory-assisted transistors as a robust pathway toward ultra-low-power and multifunctional electronic architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches an analytical route from charge-trapping memory to sub-thermal swing inside the Landauer-Büttiker model, but the derivation steps and scattering corrections are not shown.

read the letter

This paper's main point is that memory effects from charge trapping can be folded into the Landauer-Büttiker formalism to renormalize the band edge and produce sub-60 mV/dec subthreshold swing in nanometric transistors. They build a framework that treats trapping as a dynamic shift in the conduction band. The resulting expression for swing then depends on the trapping strength or a lowered carrier generation rate, which they argue allows the device to beat the Boltzmann limit in a general way. The abstract states that this matches experimental features and supplies design principles for low-power memory transistors. What stands out is the attempt to connect memory dynamics directly to gate efficiency without relying on exotic materials. That focused linkage is the clearest new element. The soft spots are in the execution. No derivation of the analytical expression appears, so it is hard to see exactly how the renormalization enters the current formula. The concern about scattering and non-equilibrium effects also looks real. Trapping adds time dependence and likely a self-energy that cuts transmission and broadens distributions. Those changes normally worsen the swing. The work gives no evidence that these were included or proven small enough to ignore. If the full text has the equations, they would need to show that the trapping term does not simply get absorbed into an effective potential or that the time dependence does not require a full NEGF treatment. This is the sort of paper that would interest people working on steep-slope devices and memory-based electronics. A reader looking for theoretical ideas on how hysteresis or trapping might help low-power scaling could take a look. The thinking is coherent enough to merit referee attention, even though the current version needs the missing steps filled in. It is not the kind of result I would cite right away, but it could be a useful starting point once the formalism is tightened. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework within the Landauer-Büttiker quantum transport formalism that incorporates charge-trapping mechanisms to dynamically renormalize the conduction band edge in nanometric field-effect transistors. It claims this intrinsic memory effect produces an analytical expression for subthreshold swing that links memory dynamics to gate efficiency, enabling sub-thermal switching via reduced carrier generation rate or enhanced trapping activity and thereby bypassing the 60 mV/decade Boltzmann limit.

Significance. If the central derivation holds after accounting for time-dependent and scattering effects, the work would supply a material-agnostic route to memory-assisted transistors for ultra-low-power electronics, offering design principles distinct from ferroelectric or tunnel-based approaches and potentially explaining certain experimental observations of sub-thermal behavior.

major comments (3)

[Theoretical Framework / Derivation of subthreshold swing] The abstract and theoretical development assert an analytical expression for subthreshold swing that explicitly links memory dynamics to gate efficiency, yet the manuscript supplies neither the derivation steps from the Landauer-Büttiker integral nor the explicit form of the renormalized band edge or transmission function. Without these steps it is impossible to verify whether the claimed reduction in effective swing survives inclusion of time-dependent trapping or scattering.
[Landauer-Büttiker Formalism with Charge Trapping] The skeptic concern is not addressed: a static band-edge shift can be absorbed into chemical potential or T(E), but charge trapping is inherently time-dependent and introduces a self-energy Σ_trap that reduces T(E) and broadens distributions. The manuscript does not derive or bound the magnitude of these corrections in the subthreshold regime, leaving the central claim that reduced carrier generation yields sub-thermal swing unverified.
[Results / Comparison to Experiment] The abstract states that the model 'captures key experimental features,' but no comparison to measured data, numerical NEGF simulations, or even parameter values for the carrier generation rate is provided. This absence makes the claim that the framework is generalizable and robust unverifiable.

minor comments (2)

[Notation and Definitions] Notation for the memory-dependent renormalization (e.g., how the trapping time constant enters the effective E_c) should be defined explicitly before the final analytical expression is presented.
[Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of the assumptions under which non-equilibrium carrier distributions remain negligible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the presentation of the derivation, clarify the treatment of time-dependent trapping, and add explicit comparisons. We respond to each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theoretical Framework / Derivation of subthreshold swing] The abstract and theoretical development assert an analytical expression for subthreshold swing that explicitly links memory dynamics to gate efficiency, yet the manuscript supplies neither the derivation steps from the Landauer-Büttiker integral nor the explicit form of the renormalized band edge or transmission function. Without these steps it is impossible to verify whether the claimed reduction in effective swing survives inclusion of time-dependent trapping or scattering.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript presented the final analytical expression without sufficient intermediate steps. In the revised version we have inserted a new subsection that starts from the Landauer-Büttiker current integral, introduces the time-dependent band-edge shift δE_c(t) = α N_trap(t) arising from the trapping rate equation, and shows how this shift enters the transmission function T(E,t). The resulting subthreshold swing is derived as S = (kT/q) ln(10) / (1 + γ dN_trap/dV_g), where γ encodes the memory-gate coupling. We explicitly demonstrate that the reduction survives the inclusion of slow trapping dynamics provided the trapping time scale remains longer than the transit time. revision: yes
Referee: [Landauer-Büttiker Formalism with Charge Trapping] The skeptic concern is not addressed: a static band-edge shift can be absorbed into chemical potential or T(E), but charge trapping is inherently time-dependent and introduces a self-energy Σ_trap that reduces T(E) and broadens distributions. The manuscript does not derive or bound the magnitude of these corrections in the subthreshold regime, leaving the central claim that reduced carrier generation yields sub-thermal swing unverified.

Authors: We acknowledge that a purely static shift is absorbable. Our framework, however, relies on the dynamic component: the trapping rate itself modulates the effective carrier supply. In the revision we derive the first-order self-energy correction Σ_trap in the subthreshold regime and bound its magnitude, showing that for trapping frequencies below the inverse transit time the additional broadening remains smaller than the memory-induced band-edge motion. Consequently the net effect is still a reduction in the effective swing. This bound is now stated explicitly together with the relevant inequalities. revision: yes
Referee: [Results / Comparison to Experiment] The abstract states that the model 'captures key experimental features,' but no comparison to measured data, numerical NEGF simulations, or even parameter values for the carrier generation rate is provided. This absence makes the claim that the framework is generalizable and robust unverifiable.

Authors: We have added a dedicated results subsection that supplies concrete parameter values (carrier generation rate G_0 = 10^{12} cm^{-2} s^{-1}, trapping time constants 1–100 μs) and overlays the predicted swing versus memory coupling strength on published experimental data for charge-trapping memory FETs. While a full NEGF simulation lies beyond the present analytic scope, we note that the analytic limits recover the expected behavior of prior NEGF studies when memory is turned off. A new figure and table of parameters have been included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model derives subthermal swing from explicit trapping incorporation in Landauer-Büttiker

full rationale

The paper constructs an analytical expression for subthreshold swing by incorporating charge-trapping into the Landauer-Büttiker formalism, dynamically renormalizing the band edge and linking it to memory dynamics and gate efficiency. This is a forward derivation from stated mechanisms to a closed-form result, not a reduction of the output to the input by definition or fitting. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or renamed empirical patterns are invoked as load-bearing steps. The claim that reduced generation or enhanced trapping yields sub-thermal switching follows directly from the model's assumptions rather than tautologically presupposing the conclusion. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the standard Landauer integral.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the Landauer-Büttiker formalism plus an ad-hoc dynamic renormalization of the band edge by trapping; carrier generation rate appears as a tunable quantity whose value controls whether the swing becomes sub-thermal.

free parameters (1)

carrier generation rate
Explicitly invoked as a control parameter whose reduction produces sub-thermal behavior; its value is not derived from first principles within the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Landauer-Büttiker quantum transport formalism remains valid when charge-trapping dynamically shifts the conduction band edge
Invoked as the base formalism into which trapping is inserted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1270 out tokens · 44253 ms · 2026-05-21T20:39:59.620350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

X. Wang, P. Yu, Z. Lei, J. Li, W. Feng, K. Zhai, W.- J. Liu, W. Bao, W.-H. Wang, and W.-D. Hu, Nature Communications10, 3037 (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

Luk’yanchuk, A

I. Luk’yanchuk, A. Razumnaya, A. Sen´ e, Y. Tikhonov, and V. M. Vinokur, npj Computational Materials8, 52 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

C. Qiu, F. Liu, L. Xu, B. Deng, M. Xiao, J. Si, L. Lin, 5 Z. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Guo,et al., Science361, 387 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

C. E. Leiserson, N. C. Thompson, J. S. Emer, B. C. Kusz- maul, B. W. Lampson, D. Sanchez, and T. B. Schardl, Science368, eaam9744 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Y. Zhai, Z. Feng, Y. Zhou, and S.-T. Han, Materials Hori- zons8, 1601 (2021)

work page 2021
[6]

Ilatikhameneh, T

H. Ilatikhameneh, T. A. Ameen, G. Klimeck, J. Appen- zeller, and R. Rahman, IEEE Electron Device Letters36, 1097 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

K. S. Kanagarajan and D. K. Sadhasivan, Beilstein Jour- nal of Nanotechnology15, 713 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Y. Xiao, X. Jiang, and L.-W. Wang, Physical Review Applied21, 064046 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

W. Gan, R. J. Prentki, F. Liu, J. Bu, K. Luo, Q. Zhang, H. Zhu, W. Wang, T. Ye, H. Yin,et al., IEEE Transac- tions on Electron Devices67, 2243 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

J. Lyu, J. Pei, Y. Guo, J. Gong, and H. Li, Advanced Materials32, 1906000 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

M. Xiao, Y. Lin, L. Xu, B. Deng, H. Peng, L.-M. Peng, and Z. Zhang, Advanced Electronic Materials6, 2000258 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Z. Tang, C. Liu, X. Huang, S. Zeng, L. Liu, J. Li, Y.-G. Jiang, D. W. Zhang, and P. Zhou, Nano letters21, 1758 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

Salahuddin and S

S. Salahuddin and S. Datta, Nano Letters8, 405 (2008)

work page 2008
[14]

J. Yang, C. Chen, M. Tang, J.-J. Zhang, X.-S. Wang, W.-Z. Liu, and X. Wang, Advanced Electronic Materials 11, 2400685 (2025)

work page 2025
[15]

Chattopadhyay, Micro and Nanostructures187, 207756 (2024)

A. Chattopadhyay, Micro and Nanostructures187, 207756 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Kamaei, X

S. Kamaei, X. Liu, A. Saeidi, Y. Wei, C. Gastaldi, J. Brugger, and A. M. Ionescu, Nature Electronics6, 658 (2023)

work page 2023
[17]

Z. Wang, X. Liu, X. Zhou, Y. Yuan, K. Zhou, D. Zhang, H. Luo, and J. Sun, Advanced Materials34, 2200032 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Si, C.-J

M. Si, C.-J. Su, C. Jiang, N. J. Conrad, H. Zhou, K. D. Maize, G. Qiu, C.-T. Wu, A. Shakouri, M. A. Alam, et al., Nature nanotechnology13, 24 (2018)

work page 2018
[19]

H. W. Cho, P. Pujar, M. Choi, S. Kang, S. Hong, J. Park, S. Baek, Y. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Kim, npj 2D Materials and Applications5, 46 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

L. Tu, R. Cao, X. Wang, Y. Chen, S. Wu, F. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Shen, T. Lin, P. Zhou,et al., Nature com- munications11, 101 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

Nadeem, I

M. Nadeem, I. Di Bernardo, X. Wang, M. S. Fuhrer, and D. Culcer, Nano Letters21, 3155 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

H. Choi, J. Li, T. Kang, Y. Guo, H.-W. Chen, C.-H. Lien, D.-H. Lien, K. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Bachtold, C. H. D. Lee, Y.-H. Chen, J.-K. Huang, W.-H. Chang, and A. Javey, Nature Communications13, 6076 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Y. Shao, M. G. Pala, H. Tang, J. Zhang, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L.-E. Wernersson, and C. Thelander, Nature Electronics8, 157 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

Beyond von neumann (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

S. Yang, J. Yuan, Z. Wang, X. Wu, X. Shen, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, J. Wang, S. Lei, R. Li, and W. Hu, Advanced Materials36, 2309337 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

J. Aziz, H. Kim, T. Hussain, H. Lee, T. Choi, S. Rehman, M. F. Khan, K. D. Kadam, H. Patil, S. M. Z. Mehdi, M.- J. Lee, S. J. Lee, and D.-k. Kim, Nano Energy95, 107060 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

R. S. W. Silva, F. Hartmann, and V. Lopez-Richard, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices69, 5351 (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

Lopez-Richard, R

V. Lopez-Richard, R. S. W. Silva, O. Lipan, and F. Hart- mann, Journal of Applied Physics133, 134901 (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

Datta,Lessons from Nanoelectronics: A New Per- spective on Transport, Part A: Basic Concepts, 2nd ed., Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol

S. Datta,Lessons from Nanoelectronics: A New Per- spective on Transport, Part A: Basic Concepts, 2nd ed., Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol. 5 (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2017)

work page 2017
[30]

S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng,Physics of Semiconductor De- vices, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2021)

work page 2021
[31]

Lundstrom and C

M. Lundstrom and C. Jeong,Near-Equilibrium Trans- port: Fundamentals and Applications, Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol. 2 (World Sci- entific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2013)

work page 2013
[32]

Maier, F

P. Maier, F. Hartmann, M. Rebello Sousa Dias, M. Em- merling, C. Schneider, L. K. Castelano, M. Kamp, G. E. Marques, V. Lopez-Richard, L. Worschech, and S. H¨ ofling, Applied Physics Letters109, 023501 (2016)

work page 2016
[33]

V. K. Sangwan, H.-S. Lee, H. Bergeron, I. Balla, M. E. Beck, K.-S. Chen, and M. C. Hersam, Nature554, 500 (2018)

work page 2018
[34]

Miller, F

K. Miller, F. Hartmann, B. Leikert, S. Kuhn, J. Gabel, M. Sing, R. Claessen, and S. H¨ ofling, Applied Physics Letters118, 153502 (2021)

work page 2021
[35]

Hartmann, P

F. Hartmann, P. Maier, M. Rebello Sousa Dias, S. G¨ opfert, L. K. Castelano, M. Emmerling, C. Schnei- der, S. H¨ ofling, M. Kamp, Y. V. Pershin, G. E. Marques, V. Lopez-Richard, and L. Worschech, Nano Letters17, 2273 (2017)

work page 2017
[36]

Lopez-Richard, S

V. Lopez-Richard, S. Pradhan, R. S. Wengenroth Silva, O. Lipan, L. K. Castelano, S. H¨ ofling, and F. Hartmann, Journal of Applied Physics136, 165103 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Lopez-Richard, S

V. Lopez-Richard, S. Pradhan, L. K. Castelano, R. S. Wengenroth Silva, O. Lipan, S. H¨ ofling, and F. Hart- mann, Journal of Applied Physics136, 165104 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Hoffmann, F

M. Hoffmann, F. P. G. Fengler, M. Herzig, T. Mittmann, B. Max, U. Schroeder, R. Negrea, P. Lucian, S. Slesazeck, and T. Mikolajick, Nature565, 464 (2019)

work page 2019
[39]

Chen and Y

R.-S. Chen and Y. Lu, Small20, 2304445 (2024)

work page 2024

[1] [1]

X. Wang, P. Yu, Z. Lei, J. Li, W. Feng, K. Zhai, W.- J. Liu, W. Bao, W.-H. Wang, and W.-D. Hu, Nature Communications10, 3037 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [2]

Luk’yanchuk, A

I. Luk’yanchuk, A. Razumnaya, A. Sen´ e, Y. Tikhonov, and V. M. Vinokur, npj Computational Materials8, 52 (2022)

work page 2022

[3] [3]

C. Qiu, F. Liu, L. Xu, B. Deng, M. Xiao, J. Si, L. Lin, 5 Z. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Guo,et al., Science361, 387 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

C. E. Leiserson, N. C. Thompson, J. S. Emer, B. C. Kusz- maul, B. W. Lampson, D. Sanchez, and T. B. Schardl, Science368, eaam9744 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Y. Zhai, Z. Feng, Y. Zhou, and S.-T. Han, Materials Hori- zons8, 1601 (2021)

work page 2021

[6] [6]

Ilatikhameneh, T

H. Ilatikhameneh, T. A. Ameen, G. Klimeck, J. Appen- zeller, and R. Rahman, IEEE Electron Device Letters36, 1097 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

K. S. Kanagarajan and D. K. Sadhasivan, Beilstein Jour- nal of Nanotechnology15, 713 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Y. Xiao, X. Jiang, and L.-W. Wang, Physical Review Applied21, 064046 (2024)

work page 2024

[9] [9]

W. Gan, R. J. Prentki, F. Liu, J. Bu, K. Luo, Q. Zhang, H. Zhu, W. Wang, T. Ye, H. Yin,et al., IEEE Transac- tions on Electron Devices67, 2243 (2020)

work page 2020

[10] [10]

J. Lyu, J. Pei, Y. Guo, J. Gong, and H. Li, Advanced Materials32, 1906000 (2020)

work page 2020

[11] [11]

M. Xiao, Y. Lin, L. Xu, B. Deng, H. Peng, L.-M. Peng, and Z. Zhang, Advanced Electronic Materials6, 2000258 (2020)

work page 2020

[12] [12]

Z. Tang, C. Liu, X. Huang, S. Zeng, L. Liu, J. Li, Y.-G. Jiang, D. W. Zhang, and P. Zhou, Nano letters21, 1758 (2021)

work page 2021

[13] [13]

Salahuddin and S

S. Salahuddin and S. Datta, Nano Letters8, 405 (2008)

work page 2008

[14] [14]

J. Yang, C. Chen, M. Tang, J.-J. Zhang, X.-S. Wang, W.-Z. Liu, and X. Wang, Advanced Electronic Materials 11, 2400685 (2025)

work page 2025

[15] [15]

Chattopadhyay, Micro and Nanostructures187, 207756 (2024)

A. Chattopadhyay, Micro and Nanostructures187, 207756 (2024)

work page 2024

[16] [16]

Kamaei, X

S. Kamaei, X. Liu, A. Saeidi, Y. Wei, C. Gastaldi, J. Brugger, and A. M. Ionescu, Nature Electronics6, 658 (2023)

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Z. Wang, X. Liu, X. Zhou, Y. Yuan, K. Zhou, D. Zhang, H. Luo, and J. Sun, Advanced Materials34, 2200032 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

Si, C.-J

M. Si, C.-J. Su, C. Jiang, N. J. Conrad, H. Zhou, K. D. Maize, G. Qiu, C.-T. Wu, A. Shakouri, M. A. Alam, et al., Nature nanotechnology13, 24 (2018)

work page 2018

[19] [19]

H. W. Cho, P. Pujar, M. Choi, S. Kang, S. Hong, J. Park, S. Baek, Y. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Kim, npj 2D Materials and Applications5, 46 (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [20]

L. Tu, R. Cao, X. Wang, Y. Chen, S. Wu, F. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Shen, T. Lin, P. Zhou,et al., Nature com- munications11, 101 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

Nadeem, I

M. Nadeem, I. Di Bernardo, X. Wang, M. S. Fuhrer, and D. Culcer, Nano Letters21, 3155 (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

H. Choi, J. Li, T. Kang, Y. Guo, H.-W. Chen, C.-H. Lien, D.-H. Lien, K. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Bachtold, C. H. D. Lee, Y.-H. Chen, J.-K. Huang, W.-H. Chang, and A. Javey, Nature Communications13, 6076 (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Y. Shao, M. G. Pala, H. Tang, J. Zhang, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L.-E. Wernersson, and C. Thelander, Nature Electronics8, 157 (2025)

work page 2025

[24] [24]

Beyond von neumann (2020)

work page 2020

[25] [25]

S. Yang, J. Yuan, Z. Wang, X. Wu, X. Shen, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, J. Wang, S. Lei, R. Li, and W. Hu, Advanced Materials36, 2309337 (2024)

work page 2024

[26] [26]

J. Aziz, H. Kim, T. Hussain, H. Lee, T. Choi, S. Rehman, M. F. Khan, K. D. Kadam, H. Patil, S. M. Z. Mehdi, M.- J. Lee, S. J. Lee, and D.-k. Kim, Nano Energy95, 107060 (2022)

work page 2022

[27] [27]

R. S. W. Silva, F. Hartmann, and V. Lopez-Richard, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices69, 5351 (2022)

work page 2022

[28] [28]

Lopez-Richard, R

V. Lopez-Richard, R. S. W. Silva, O. Lipan, and F. Hart- mann, Journal of Applied Physics133, 134901 (2023)

work page 2023

[29] [29]

Datta,Lessons from Nanoelectronics: A New Per- spective on Transport, Part A: Basic Concepts, 2nd ed., Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol

S. Datta,Lessons from Nanoelectronics: A New Per- spective on Transport, Part A: Basic Concepts, 2nd ed., Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol. 5 (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2017)

work page 2017

[30] [30]

S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng,Physics of Semiconductor De- vices, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2021)

work page 2021

[31] [31]

Lundstrom and C

M. Lundstrom and C. Jeong,Near-Equilibrium Trans- port: Fundamentals and Applications, Lessons from Nanoscience: A Lecture Note Series, Vol. 2 (World Sci- entific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2013)

work page 2013

[32] [32]

Maier, F

P. Maier, F. Hartmann, M. Rebello Sousa Dias, M. Em- merling, C. Schneider, L. K. Castelano, M. Kamp, G. E. Marques, V. Lopez-Richard, L. Worschech, and S. H¨ ofling, Applied Physics Letters109, 023501 (2016)

work page 2016

[33] [33]

V. K. Sangwan, H.-S. Lee, H. Bergeron, I. Balla, M. E. Beck, K.-S. Chen, and M. C. Hersam, Nature554, 500 (2018)

work page 2018

[34] [34]

Miller, F

K. Miller, F. Hartmann, B. Leikert, S. Kuhn, J. Gabel, M. Sing, R. Claessen, and S. H¨ ofling, Applied Physics Letters118, 153502 (2021)

work page 2021

[35] [35]

Hartmann, P

F. Hartmann, P. Maier, M. Rebello Sousa Dias, S. G¨ opfert, L. K. Castelano, M. Emmerling, C. Schnei- der, S. H¨ ofling, M. Kamp, Y. V. Pershin, G. E. Marques, V. Lopez-Richard, and L. Worschech, Nano Letters17, 2273 (2017)

work page 2017

[36] [36]

Lopez-Richard, S

V. Lopez-Richard, S. Pradhan, R. S. Wengenroth Silva, O. Lipan, L. K. Castelano, S. H¨ ofling, and F. Hartmann, Journal of Applied Physics136, 165103 (2024)

work page 2024

[37] [37]

Lopez-Richard, S

V. Lopez-Richard, S. Pradhan, L. K. Castelano, R. S. Wengenroth Silva, O. Lipan, S. H¨ ofling, and F. Hart- mann, Journal of Applied Physics136, 165104 (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

Hoffmann, F

M. Hoffmann, F. P. G. Fengler, M. Herzig, T. Mittmann, B. Max, U. Schroeder, R. Negrea, P. Lucian, S. Slesazeck, and T. Mikolajick, Nature565, 464 (2019)

work page 2019

[39] [39]

Chen and Y

R.-S. Chen and Y. Lu, Small20, 2304445 (2024)

work page 2024