pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.03901 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Orbital Hall effect from orbital magnetic moments of Bloch states: the role of a new correction term

Tarik P. Cysne , Ivo Souza , Tatiana G. Rappoport This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords orbital Hall effectorbital magnetic momentBloch statesBerry connectionvan der Waals bilayersgauge covarianceorbitronicscorrection terms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Including the Berry connection term in Bloch state derivatives yields two new contributions to orbital magnetic moment matrix elements that reduce orbital Hall conductivity in bilayer systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper provides a rigorous derivation of the orbital magnetic moment matrix elements for non-degenerate Bloch states, incorporating the Berry connection in the crystal momentum derivatives that earlier calculations omitted. This produces two additional terms: one restoring gauge covariance and another that is inherently gauge covariant and can alter numerical results substantially. Application to the orbital Hall effect in a 2H transition metal dichalcogenide bilayer and a biased bilayer graphene shows that these terms lower the conductivity plateau relative to previous estimates. The findings indicate that multi-layered van der Waals materials are especially sensitive to these corrections. Such adjustments advance the theoretical basis for orbital moment transport in emerging orbitronics studies.

Core claim

The authors derive a formula for the orbital magnetic moment matrix elements of Bloch states that includes the Berry connection term in k-derivatives, identifying two new contributions. The first restores gauge covariance for non-degenerate states, while the second provides gauge-covariant quantitative corrections that reduce the orbital Hall conductivity in the examined bilayer systems.

What carries the argument

The matrix elements of the orbital magnetic moment of Bloch states, with the Berry connection included in the derivatives with respect to wavevector.

If this is right

  • The derived formula applies to any non-degenerate Bloch states in Hilbert space.
  • These new terms reduce the orbital Hall conductivity plateau in both the 2H TMD bilayer and biased bilayer graphene.
  • Multi-layered van der Waals materials may be particularly susceptible to the OMM corrections.
  • The results contribute to the formal understanding of electronic orbital magnetic moment transport.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar Berry connection corrections could modify other orbital-related transport coefficients beyond the Hall effect.
  • Experimental probes of orbital Hall conductivity in bilayer systems could test the magnitude of these corrections directly.
  • Extending the derivation to degenerate states or other material classes might reveal further adjustments to orbital transport predictions.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes non-degenerate Bloch states and identifies the Berry connection term as the key omitted piece in prior orbital magnetic moment formulas.

What would settle it

Calculating or measuring the orbital Hall conductivity in a 2H transition metal dichalcogenide bilayer with and without the new correction terms to check if the plateau value decreases as predicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.03901 by Ivo Souza, Tarik P. Cysne, Tatiana G. Rappoport.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) The Fermi momenta of the bilayer 2H-MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Orbital Hall conductivity of bilayer graphene sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a rigorous derivation of the matrix elements of the orbital magnetic moment (OMM) of Bloch states. Our calculations include the Berry connection term in the k-derivatives of Bloch states, which was omitted in previous works. The resulting formula for the OMM matrix elements applies to any non-degenerate Bloch states within Hilbert space. We identify two new contributions: the first restores gauge covariance for non-degenerate states, while the second, being itself gauge covariant, can provide significant quantitative corrections depending on the system under study. We examine their impact on the orbital Hall effect in two bilayer systems: a 2H transition metal dichalcogenide bilayer and a biased bilayer graphene. In both cases, these new terms reduce the orbital Hall conductivity plateau compared with results that neglect them, suggesting that multi-layered van der Waals materials may be particularly susceptible to the derived OMM corrections. Our findings may contribute to the formal understanding of electronic OMM transport and to the conceptual foundations of the emerging field of orbitronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a derivation of the matrix elements of the orbital magnetic moment for non-degenerate Bloch states that retains the Berry connection contribution to the k-derivatives of the cell-periodic Bloch functions. Two new terms are isolated: one that restores gauge covariance of the OMM and a second gauge-covariant correction whose magnitude depends on the system. The effect of these terms is quantified by computing the orbital Hall conductivity in a 2H TMD bilayer and in biased bilayer graphene, where both new contributions reduce the value of the conductivity plateau relative to earlier formulas.

Significance. A corrected expression for the OMM matrix elements would directly affect quantitative predictions of orbital Hall transport in layered van der Waals systems. The explicit demonstration that the corrections lower the plateau in two representative bilayers indicates that the effect may be appreciable in multi-layer structures, thereby refining the theoretical basis for orbitronic device modeling.

minor comments (2)
  1. The numerical implementation section should state the precise tight-binding parameters (hopping amplitudes, bias voltage, interlayer distance) used for the two bilayer models so that the reported reduction in orbital Hall conductivity can be reproduced independently.
  2. A short paragraph comparing the magnitude of the two new contributions to the conventional term across the Brillouin zone would help readers assess when the corrections are negligible versus when they dominate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive summary and recommendation of minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the derivation of the gauge-covariant corrections to the orbital magnetic moment matrix elements and their quantitative impact on the orbital Hall conductivity in the two bilayer systems considered.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation

full rationale

The paper supplies an explicit derivation of OMM matrix elements for non-degenerate Bloch states that incorporates the Berry connection term in k-derivatives previously omitted elsewhere. The full text isolates the two new contributions (one restoring gauge covariance, one providing a covariant correction) through direct calculation steps without reducing any result to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional tautology. The non-degeneracy assumption is stated at the outset and matches the gapped bilayer models used for illustration; the quantitative impact on orbital Hall conductivity is shown numerically but does not define or force the analytic formula. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are described. Relies on standard Bloch theorem and Berry-phase formalism from prior literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bloch states are non-degenerate and defined within the Hilbert space of the crystal Hamiltonian
    Stated explicitly as the domain of applicability for the derived OMM formula.
  • standard math Standard k-derivative operators on Bloch wavefunctions include the Berry connection
    This is the central addition claimed to have been omitted previously.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1355 out tokens · 32557 ms · 2026-05-18T00:24:34.000592+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Modern Approach to Orbital Hall Effect Based on Wannier Picture of Solids

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Wannier-based definition of the orbital angular momentum operator that includes itinerant parts produces significant non-local corrections to orbital Hall conductivity in first-principles calculations across several...

  2. $P$-wave Orbital Magnetism

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    P-wave orbital magnetism protected by combined translation and time-reversal symmetry is proposed to originate from loop-current-induced orbital textures in a 2D Dirac lattice model, measurable via orbital Hall conductivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Demonstrating the identity of Eq. (3) Considering that Hamiltonian ˆHk has a non- degenerate energy spectrum, one can write the following relation: ⟨n|⃗∇km⟩= ⟨n| ⃗∇k ˆHk |m⟩ ϵm −ϵ n ,valid forn̸=m.(A1) Applying|n⟩and summing overn̸=m, X n̸=m |n⟩ ⟨n| ⃗∇k ˆHk |m⟩ ϵm −ϵ n =  X n̸=m |n⟩ ⟨n|   |⃗∇km⟩ = [1− |m⟩ ⟨m|]| ⃗∇km⟩ =| ⃗∇km⟩+i ⃗Amk |m⟩. (A2) using th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (8) with Eq

    Consistency of Eq. (8) with Eq. (3) Given the expression, ⟨n| ˆ⃗ r|n′⟩=⟨n| i ˆ⃗d−1 ⃗An′k |n′⟩.(A3) Considering that position is a Hermitian operator, then ˆ⃗ r=ˆ⃗ r†, or i ˆ⃗d−1 ⃗An′k = i ˆ⃗d−1 ⃗An′k † =−i ˆ⃗d† −1 ⃗An′k (A4) and we have ˆ⃗d=− ˆ⃗d†. Defining ˆ⃗d|n⟩=| ⃗∇kn⟩we have ⟨⃗∇kn|=⟨n| ˆ⃗d† =− ⟨n| ˆ⃗d. Then we obtain: ˆ⃗d|n⟩=| ⃗∇kn⟩(A5) ⟨n| ˆ⃗d=− ⟨ ⃗∇...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This calculation is detailed in Ref

    First-Order perturbation theory int ⊥/∆ One can use degenerate perturbation theory to calcu- late the corrected energies and wave functions of Eq.(17) to first order in interlayer coupling. This calculation is detailed in Ref. [62] and yields the following results for the corrected energies: ˜Ev(c),±(q) =E 0 v(c)(q) +δE v(c),±(q),(C1) where E0 v(c)(q) = 1...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We now insert this operator, along with the energy and vector states given in Eqs (C1, C5), into the orbital Berry curvature

    Orbital Hall conductivity of bilayer 2H-TMD using the complete OMM expression Using the results obtained in the main text [Eqs.(21)], we compute the orbital current flowing in the y-direction: J y,Lz qτ = τ at µB   aq sin(θ)− i 2 m0 q 0 0 i 2 m0 q aq sin(θ) 0 0 0 0−a q sin(θ)− i 2 m0 q 0 0 i 2 m0 q −aq sin(θ)   ,(C10) wherea q = (e/ℏ)(at/(4q)). We...

    work page

  5. [5]

    G. Go, D. An, H.-W. Lee, and S. K. Kim, Magnon orbital nernst effect in honeycomb antiferromagnets without spin–orbit coupling, 11 Nano Letters24, 5968 (2024), pMID: 38682941, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00430

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00430 2024

  6. [6]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon angular momentum hall effect, Nano Letters20, 7694 (2020), pMID: 32955897, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03220

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03220 2020

  7. [7]

    R. R. Neumann, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Or- bital magnetic moment of magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117209 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    R. S. Fishman, J. S. Gardner, and S. Okamoto, Or- bital angular momentum of magnons in collinear mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 167202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current inp-doped silicon, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 066601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital hall effect in a light metal ti, Nature619, 52–56 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Or- bital hanle magnetoresistance in a3dtransition metal, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A. Pezo, D. García Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall physics in two-dimensional dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075427 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    D. B. Fonseca, L. L. A. Pereira, and A. L. R. Barbosa, Orbital hall effect in mesoscopic devices, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    A. Pezo, D. García Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri- butions, Phys. Rev. B106, 104414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R.K.Kawakami,Magneto-opticaldetectionoftheorbital hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Faridi and R

    A. Faridi and R. Asgari, Comparing the extrinsic orbital hall effect in centrosymmetric and noncentrosymmetric systems: Insights from bilayer transition metal dichalco- genides, Annals of Physics483, 170265 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    J. L. Costa, E. Santos, J. B. S. Mendes, and A. Azevedo, Dominanceoftheorbitalhalleffectoverspinintransition metalheterostructures,Phys.Rev.B112,054443(2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    J. E. Abrão, E. Santos, J. L. Costa, J. G. S. Santos, J.B.S.Mendes,andA.Azevedo,Anomalousspinandor- bital hall phenomena in antiferromagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 026702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Veneri, T

    A. Veneri, T. G. Rappoport, and A. Ferreira, Extrinsic orbital hall effect: Orbital skew scattering and crossover between diffusive and intrinsic orbital transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 136201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    L. M. Canonico, J. H. Garcia, and S. Roche, Orbital hall responses in disordered topological materials, Phys. Rev. B110, L140201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    T. P. Cysne, F. S. M. Guimarães, L. M. Canonico, M. Costa, T. G. Rappoport, and R. B. Muniz, Orbital magnetoelectric effect in nanoribbons of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B107, 115402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    T. P. Cysne, F. S. M. Guimarães, L. M. Canonico, T. G. Rappoport, and R. B. Muniz, Orbital magnetoelectric ef- fect in zigzag nanoribbons ofp-band systems, Phys. Rev. B104, 165403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    A.Johansson,Theoryofspinandorbitaledelsteineffects, JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter36,423002(2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    A.Johansson, B.Göbel, J.Henk, M.Bibes,andI.Mertig, Spin and orbital edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application tosrtio3 interfaces, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013275 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    T. Yoda, T. Yokoyama, and S. Murakami, Or- bital edelstein effect as a condensed-matter analog of solenoids, Nano Letters18, 916 (2018), pMID: 29373028, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04300

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04300 2018

  27. [27]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallo- graphic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B98, 165110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    S.Hayami, H.Kusunose,andY.Motome,Emergentspin- valley-orbital physics by spontaneous parity breaking, JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter28,395601(2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Chirolli, M

    L. Chirolli, M. T. Mercaldo, C. Guarcello, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Colossal orbital edelstein effect in non- centrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 217703 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    S. A. Nikolaev, M. Chshiev, F. Ibrahim, S. Krishnia, N. Sebe, J.-M. George, V. Cros, H. Jaffrès, and A. Fert, Large chiral orbital texture and orbital edelstein effect in co/al heterostructure, Nano Letters0, null (0), pMID: 39433297, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01607

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01607

  31. [31]

    Go and H.-W

    D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013177 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [33]

    L. M. Canonico, J. H. Garcia, and S. Roche, Spin–orbit torqueemergingfromorbitaltexturesincentrosymmetric materials, 2D Materials12, 041001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [34]

    Santos, J

    E. Santos, J. Abrão, D. Go, L. de Assis, Y. Mokrousov, J. Mendes, and A. Azevedo, Inverse orbital torque via spin-orbital intertwined states, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 014069 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [35]

    Hayashi, D

    H. Hayashi, D. Jo, D. Go, T. Gao, S. Haku, Y. Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and K. Ando, Observation of long-range orbital transport and giant orbital torque, Communications Physics6, 10.1038/s42005-023-01139-7 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01139-7 2023

  35. [36]

    Fukunaga, S

    R. Fukunaga, S. Haku, H. Hayashi, and K. Ando, Orbital torque originating from orbital hall effect in zr, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023054 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [37]

    T. P. Cysne, M. Costa, L. M. Canonico, M. B. Nardelli, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Disentangling or- bital and valley hall effects in bilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 056601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [38]

    T. P. Cysne, L. M. Canonico, M. Costa, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbitronics in two-dimensional mate- rials, npj Spintronics3, 39 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    S. Ji, C. Quan, R. Yao, J. Yang, and X. Li, Reversal of orbital hall conductivity and emergence of tunable topo- logical quantum states in orbital hall insulators, Phys. Rev. B109, 155407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [40]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, G. R. Schleder, R. B. Muniz, A. Fazzio, and T. G. Rappoport, Connecting higher-order topology with the orbital hall effect in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 116204 (2023). 12

    work page 2023

  40. [41]

    Yao, C.-H

    Y.-T. Yao, C.-H. Chu, A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T.-R. Chang, Topological nature of orbital chern insulators (2025), arXiv:2503.08138 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    J. A. Medina-Vázquez and E. Y. González-Ramírez, d-orbital corner states in higher-order orbital hall insu- lators, Advanced Quantum Technologiesn/a, e00208, https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202500208

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202500208

  42. [43]

    Resta, Quantum-mechanical position operator in ex- tended systems, Phys

    R. Resta, Quantum-mechanical position operator in ex- tended systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1800 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [44]

    Blount, Formalisms of band theory, inSolid State Physics(Elsevier, 1962) p

    E. Blount, Formalisms of band theory, inSolid State Physics(Elsevier, 1962) p. 305–373

    work page 1962

  44. [45]

    L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, A. Molina-Sanchez, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital hall insulating phase in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B101, 161409 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    T. P. Cysne, M. Costa, M. B. Nardelli, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Ultrathin films of black phosphorus as suitable platforms for unambiguous observation of the orbital hall effect, Phys. Rev. B108, 165415 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [47]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, Theory of magnetic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in bulk ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B106, 024410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metal- lic monoatomic crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 095001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [49]

    Rang and P

    M. Rang and P. J. Kelly, Orbital relaxation length from first-principles scattering calculations, Phys. Rev. B109, 214427 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [50]

    X. Mu, Y. Pan, and J. Zhou, Pure bulk orbital and spin photocurrent in two-dimensional ferroelectric ma- terials, npj Computational Materials7, 10.1038/s41524- 021-00531-7 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524- 2021

  50. [51]

    Rang and P

    M. Rang and P. J. Kelly, Orbital hall effect in transition metals from first-principles scattering calculations, Phys. Rev. B111, 125121 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [52]

    Bhowal and S

    S. Bhowal and S. Satpathy, Intrinsic orbital moment and prediction of a large orbital hall effect in two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B101, 121112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [53]

    Beaulieu, J

    S. Beaulieu, J. Schusser, S. Dong, M. Schüler, T. Pincelli, M. Dendzik, J. Maklar, A. Neef, H. Ebert, K. Hricovini, M.Wolf, J.Braun, L.Rettig, J.Minár,andR.Ernstorfer, Revealing hidden orbital pseudospin texture with time- reversaldichroisminphotoelectronangulardistributions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 216404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [54]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  54. [55]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [56]

    Ceresoli, U

    D. Ceresoli, U. Gerstmann, A. P. Seitsonen, and F. Mauri, First-principles theory of orbital magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. B81, 060409 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [57]

    Hanke, F

    J.-P. Hanke, F. Freimuth, A. K. Nandy, H. Zhang, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov, Role of berry phase theory for describing orbital magnetism: From magnetic het- erostructures to topological orbital ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B94, 121114 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [58]

    L. L. Lage, T. P. Cysne, and A. Latgé, Orbital mag- netization in sierpinski fractals (2025), arXiv:2510.14556 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [59]

    Bhowal and G

    S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Orbital hall effect as an al- ternative to valley hall effect in gapped graphene, Phys. Rev. B103, 195309 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [60]

    Kohn, Theory of bloch electrons in a magnetic field: The effective hamiltonian, Phys

    W. Kohn, Theory of bloch electrons in a magnetic field: The effective hamiltonian, Phys. Rev.115, 1460 (1959)

    work page 1959

  60. [61]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B53, 7010 (1996)

    work page 1996

  61. [62]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry curvature, orbital mo- ment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in elec- tromagnetic fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter20, 193202 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [63]

    Culcer, Y

    D. Culcer, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Coherent wave-packet evolution in coupled bands, Phys. Rev. B72, 085110 (2005)

    work page 2005

  63. [64]

    Woźniak, P

    T. Woźniak, P. E. Faria Junior, G. Seifert, A. Chaves, and J. Kunstmann, Excitongfactors of van der waals heterostructures from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B101, 235408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [65]

    P. E. F. Junior, D. Hernangómez-Pérez, T. Amit, J. Fabian, and S. Refaely-Abramson, Generalized many- body exciton g-factors: magnetic hybridization and non- monotonic rydberg series in monolayer wse 2 (2025), arXiv:2505.18468 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    T. P. Cysne, S. Bhowal, G. Vignale, and T. G. Rap- poport, Orbital hall effect in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From the intra-atomic approximation to the bloch states orbital magnetic moment approach, Phys. Rev. B105, 195421 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [67]

    T. P. Cysne, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Trans- port of orbital currents in systems with strong intervalley coupling: The case of Kekulé distorted graphene, SciPost Phys. Core7, 046 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [68]

    T. P. Cysne, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, and T. G. Rap- poport, Controlling the orbital hall effect in gapped bi- layer graphene in the terahertz regime, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023271 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    Busch, I

    O. Busch, I. Mertig, and B. Göbel, Orbital hall effect and orbital edge states caused byselectrons, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043052 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [70]

    Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    Óscar Pozo Ocaña and I. Souza, Multipole theory of op- tical spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [71]

    H. Liu, J. H. Cullen, D. P. Arovas, and D. Culcer, Quan- tum correction to the orbital hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036304 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [72]

    Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  72. [73]

    Sun and G

    H. Sun and G. Vignale, Orbital magnetic moment dy- namics and hanle magnetoresistance in multilayered two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B111, L180408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    A. Urru, I. Souza, O. P. Ocaña, S. S. Tsirkin, and D. Van- derbilt, Optical spatial dispersion via wannier interpola- tion, Phys. Rev. B112, 045201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [75]

    Gong, G.-B

    Z. Gong, G.-B. Liu, H. Yu, D. Xiao, X. Cui, X. Xu, andW.Yao,Magnetoelectriceffectsandvalley-controlled spin quantum gates in transition metal dichalcogenide bi- layers, Nature Communications4, 10.1038/ncomms3053 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms3053 2013

  75. [76]

    Kormányos, V

    A. Kormányos, V. Zólyomi, V. I. Fal’ko, and G. Burkard, Tunable berry curvature and valley and spin hall effect in bilayermos 2, Phys. Rev. B98, 035408 (2018). 13

    work page 2018

  76. [77]

    Bhowal and S

    S. Bhowal and S. Satpathy, Intrinsic orbital and spin halleffectsinmonolayertransitionmetaldichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B102, 035409 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [78]

    McCann, Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struc- ture of bilayer graphene, Phys

    E. McCann, Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struc- ture of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B74, 161403 (2006)

    work page 2006