pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.16358 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-20 · 🧮 math.OC

iFCTN: an intra-block Fully-Connected Tensor Network Decomposition for Tensor Completion

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords tensor completionfully-connected tensor networkFCTN decompositionKhatri-Rao productproximal alternating minimizationtensor decompositionglobal convergence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Intra-block FCTN decomposition enables folding-free tensor completion while preserving full modeling power.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a variant of fully-connected tensor network decomposition called iFCTN that avoids the need for unfolding operations during factor updates. This is achieved by parameterizing each factor using Khatri-Rao products, which simplifies the reconstruction of intermediate sub-networks and leads to better structured optimization problems. The authors then apply this to tensor completion using a proximal alternating minimization algorithm and prove that it converges globally to a critical point. If correct, this would make powerful tensor decompositions practical for large-scale data recovery tasks where previous methods were too slow due to folding overhead.

Core claim

The central discovery is the intra-block FCTN decomposition, which parameterizes FCTN factors through Khatri-Rao products to make it folding-free. When used for tensor completion, an efficient proximal alternating minimization algorithm is derived that has guaranteed global convergence to a critical point and demonstrates superior performance with reduced computational cost compared to prior approaches.

What carries the argument

The intra-block FCTN (iFCTN) decomposition, which uses Khatri-Rao product parameterization of factors to eliminate folding in sub-network reconstruction.

If this is right

  • The proximal alternating minimization algorithm solves the tensor completion problem with lower computational overhead.
  • Global convergence to a critical point holds for the derived algorithm.
  • Tensor completion performance exceeds that of state-of-the-art methods in the reported experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Khatri-Rao parameterization may simplify optimization in other tensor network formats that currently rely on folding.
  • Reduced per-iteration cost could enable scaling to higher-order tensors in data recovery applications.
  • The well-structured coefficient matrices might admit even faster inner solvers than the proximal scheme used here.

Load-bearing premise

That parameterizing the factors via Khatri-Rao products preserves the full expressive power of the original FCTN without introducing errors that would reduce completion accuracy on real-world tensors.

What would settle it

If experiments on standard tensor datasets show that iFCTN has higher reconstruction error than full FCTN at similar runtimes, the claim of maintained modeling power would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16358 by Chunfeng Cui, Ziyi Gan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A graphical representation of TT, TR, FCTN and the proposed iFCTN decompositions. Here, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A comparative analysis of sub-network: FCTN versus the proposed iFCTN Decomposition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The pseudo-color renderings of reconstructions (composed of the 29th, 19th, and 9th bands) and corresponding PSNRs for MSI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reconstructions on Day 1. The first row is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The pseudo-color renderings of reconstructions (composed of the 29th, 19th, and 9th bands) and corresponding PSNRs for MSI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The pseudo-color renderings of reconstructions (composed of the 29th, 19th, and 9th bands) and corresponding PSNRs for MSI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The fully-connected tensor network (FCTN) decomposition has recently exhibited strong modeling capabilities by connecting every pair of tensor factors, thereby capturing rich cross-mode correlations. However, this advantage comes with an inherent limitation: updating the factors typically requires reconstructing auxiliary sub-networks, which entails extensive and cumbersome (un)folding. In this study, we propose the intra-block FCTN (iFCTN) decomposition, a novel (un)folding-free variant of FCTN decomposition designed to enhance computational efficiency. We parameterize each FCTN factor through Khatri-Rao products, which significantly reduces the complexity of reconstructing intermediate sub-networks and yields subproblems with well-structured coefficient matrices. Furthermore, we deploy the proposed iFCTN decomposition on the representative task of tensor completion and design an efficient proximal alternating minimization algorithm. Theoretically, we establish its global convergence to a critical point. Extensive experiments demonstrate that iFCTN outperforms state-of-the-art methods with a lower computational overhead.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the intra-block Fully-Connected Tensor Network (iFCTN) decomposition, a novel unfolding-free variant of standard FCTN obtained by parameterizing each factor via Khatri-Rao products of smaller cores. This is applied to tensor completion through a proximal alternating minimization algorithm, for which global convergence to a critical point is proved. Experiments indicate that iFCTN outperforms state-of-the-art tensor completion methods while incurring lower computational overhead.

Significance. If the Khatri-Rao parameterization preserves sufficient modeling power and the reported performance gains are not artifacts of the restricted factor space, the work would supply a practically useful, theoretically grounded alternative for large-scale tensor completion. The combination of an efficient algorithm, a global convergence guarantee, and empirical efficiency gains would be a clear contribution to the optimization and tensor-decomposition literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3] Section 3 (definition of iFCTN): the central claim that parameterizing FCTN factors through Khatri-Rao products preserves the original modeling power of unconstrained FCTN while only reducing reconstruction complexity is load-bearing yet unsupported by any explicit argument or rank analysis showing that the representable tensor manifold remains unchanged; without this, the method optimizes a strictly smaller objective and may incur systematic approximation error on tasks whose optima lie outside the Khatri-Rao-structured subspace.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (proximal alternating minimization) and Theorem on global convergence: the convergence result is stated for the iFCTN objective; because the feasible set is a proper subset of the standard FCTN factors, it is unclear whether a critical point of the restricted problem yields a competitive completion relative to the original FCTN formulation, and no comparison of the attained objective values is provided.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 3] Notation for the Khatri-Rao products and the resulting coefficient matrices in the subproblems could be introduced with an explicit small-scale example to improve readability.
  2. [Experiments] The experimental section would benefit from an ablation that isolates the effect of the Khatri-Rao constraint (e.g., by comparing against an unconstrained FCTN baseline when computationally feasible).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (definition of iFCTN): the central claim that parameterizing FCTN factors through Khatri-Rao products preserves the original modeling power of unconstrained FCTN while only reducing reconstruction complexity is load-bearing yet unsupported by any explicit argument or rank analysis showing that the representable tensor manifold remains unchanged; without this, the method optimizes a strictly smaller objective and may incur systematic approximation error on tasks whose optima lie outside the Khatri-Rao-structured subspace.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the Khatri-Rao parameterization of the factors imposes a structural restriction, resulting in a proper subset of the factor space available to unconstrained FCTN. The manuscript does not contain an explicit rank analysis or proof that the representable manifold is identical. We will revise Section 3 to explicitly state this modeling trade-off, provide a brief degrees-of-freedom comparison, and explain why the intra-block structure remains sufficiently expressive for capturing cross-mode correlations in tensor completion. These additions will clarify that iFCTN is a computationally efficient structured variant rather than an equivalent reformulation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (proximal alternating minimization) and Theorem on global convergence: the convergence result is stated for the iFCTN objective; because the feasible set is a proper subset of the standard FCTN factors, it is unclear whether a critical point of the restricted problem yields a competitive completion relative to the original FCTN formulation, and no comparison of the attained objective values is provided.

    Authors: We agree that the global convergence guarantee applies to the restricted iFCTN feasible set and that a direct comparison of attained objective values with unconstrained FCTN is absent. We will add a clarifying paragraph in Section 4 noting that the theorem concerns the structured model and that practical competitiveness is demonstrated through superior or comparable tensor completion accuracy relative to state-of-the-art methods (including FCTN-based approaches) in the experiments. A full side-by-side objective-value comparison would require re-implementing the original unfolding-heavy FCTN solver; we will instead report the iFCTN objective values alongside reconstruction errors to allow readers to assess the quality of the attained critical points. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces iFCTN as a deliberate design variant of FCTN that parameterizes each factor via Khatri-Rao products to eliminate (un)folding operations, then applies proximal alternating minimization to tensor completion and proves global convergence to a critical point via standard arguments from optimization theory. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the modeling-power preservation is stated as an explicit assumption of the new ansatz rather than derived from prior author results, and the convergence claim rests on general proximal ALM properties rather than author-specific theorems. The chain is therefore independent of the paper's own fitted quantities or prior outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim appears to rest on standard tensor-algebra identities and proximal-operator properties whose precise invocation cannot be audited here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1156 out tokens · 39088 ms · 2026-05-17T20:54:08.450624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

  2. [2]

    Tensor decompositions for learning latent variable models

    Animashree Anandkumar, Rong Ge, Daniel J Hsu, Sham M Kakade, Matus Telgarsky, et al. Tensor decompositions for learning latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15 0 (1): 0 2773--2832, 2014

  3. [3]

    Grey Ballard and Tamara G. Kolda. Tensor decompositions for data science. Cambridge University Press, 2025

  4. [4]

    Bengua, Ho N

    Johann A. Bengua, Ho N. Phien, Hoang Duong Tuan, and Minh N. Do. Efficient tensor completion for color image and video recovery: low-rank tensor train. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26 0 (5): 0 2466--2479, 2017

  5. [5]

    Nonnegative matrix and tensor factorizations, chapter 7, pages 337--432

    Andrzej Cichocki, Rafal Zdunek, Anh-Huy Phan, and Shun-ichi Amari. Nonnegative matrix and tensor factorizations, chapter 7, pages 337--432. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009

  6. [6]

    Tensor decompositions for signal processing applications from two-way to multiway component analysis

    Andrzej Cichocki, Danilo Mandic, Anh-Huy Phan, Cesar Caiafa, Guoxu Zhou, Qibin Zhao, and Lieven Lathauwer. Tensor decompositions for signal processing applications from two-way to multiway component analysis. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 32, 2014

  7. [7]

    Nested fully-connected tensor network decomposition for multi-dimensional visual data recovery

    Zhi-Long Han, Ting-Zhu Huang, Xi-Le Zhao, Hao Zhang, and Wei-Hao Wu. Nested fully-connected tensor network decomposition for multi-dimensional visual data recovery. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 34 0 (10): 0 10092--10106, 2024

  8. [8]

    Hitchcock

    Frank L. Hitchcock. The expression of a tensor or a polyadic as a sum of products. Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 6 0 (1-4): 0 164--189, 1927

  9. [9]

    Efficient FCTN decomposition with structural sparsity for noisy tensor completion

    Wei-Jian Huang, Li Huang, Tai-Xiang Jiang, Yu-Bang Zheng, and Guisong Liu. Efficient FCTN decomposition with structural sparsity for noisy tensor completion. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2025

  10. [10]

    Lower and upper bounds on the pseudo-dimension of tensor network models

    Behnoush Khavari and Guillaume Rabusseau. Lower and upper bounds on the pseudo-dimension of tensor network models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 10931--10943. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021

  11. [11]

    Third-order tensors as operators on matrices

    Misha E Kilmer, Karen Braman, Ning Hao, and Robert C Hoover. Third-order tensors as operators on matrices. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 34 0 (1): 0 148--172, 2013

  12. [12]

    Tensor decompositions and applications

    Tamara G Kolda and Brett W Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 51 0 (3): 0 455--500, 2009

  13. [13]

    Tensor completion for estimating missing values in visual data

    Ji Liu, Przemyslaw Musialski, Peter Wonka, and Jieping Ye. Tensor completion for estimating missing values in visual data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35 0 (1): 0 208--220, 2013

  14. [14]

    Ng, and Ting-Zhu Huang

    Yun-Yang Liu, Xi-Le Zhao, Guang-Jing Song, Yu-Bang Zheng, Michael K. Ng, and Ting-Zhu Huang. Fully-connected tensor network decomposition for robust tensor completion problem. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 18 0 (1): 0 208--238, 2024

  15. [15]

    Rank-revealing fully-connected tensor network decomposition and its application to tensor completion

    Yun-Yang Liu, Xi-Le Zhao, and Gemine Vivone. Rank-revealing fully-connected tensor network decomposition and its application to tensor completion. Pattern Recognition, 165: 0 111610, 2025

  16. [16]

    Multi-dimensional image recovery via fully-connected tensor network decomposition under the learnable transforms

    Cheng-Yao Lyu, Xi-Le Zhao, Ben-Zheng Li, Hao Zhang, and Ting-Zhu Huang. Multi-dimensional image recovery via fully-connected tensor network decomposition under the learnable transforms. Journal of Scientific Computing, 93 0 (2): 0 49, 2022

  17. [17]

    Tensor-train decomposition

    Ivan V Oseledets. Tensor-train decomposition. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33 0 (5): 0 2295--2317, 2011

  18. [18]

    Tensor decomposition for signal processing and machine learning

    Nicholas D Sidiropoulos, Lieven De Lathauwer, Xiao Fu, Kejun Huang, Evangelos E Papalexakis, and Christos Faloutsos. Tensor decomposition for signal processing and machine learning. IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 65 0 (13): 0 3551--3582, 2017

  19. [19]

    Deep fully-connected tensor network decomposition for multi-dimensional signal recovery

    Ruoyang Su, Xi-Le Zhao, Wei-Hao Wu, Sheng Liu, and Junhua He. Deep fully-connected tensor network decomposition for multi-dimensional signal recovery. Signal Processing, 233: 0 109903, 2025

  20. [20]

    Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis

    Ledyard R Tucker. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31 0 (3): 0 279--311, 1966

  21. [21]

    A random sampling algorithm for fully-connected tensor network decomposition with applications

    Mengyu Wang, Honghua Cui, and Hanyu Li. A random sampling algorithm for fully-connected tensor network decomposition with applications. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 43 0 (4): 0 226, 2024

  22. [22]

    Wide compression: tensor ring nets

    Wenqi Wang, Yifan Sun, Brian Eriksson, Wenlin Wang, and Vaneet Aggarwal. Wide compression: tensor ring nets. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9329--9338, 2018

  23. [23]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13 0 (4): 0 600--612, 2004

  24. [24]

    Parallel matrix factorization for low-rank tensor completion

    Yangyang Xu, Ruru Hao, Wotao Yin, and Zhixun Su. Parallel matrix factorization for low-rank tensor completion. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 9 0 (2): 0 601--624, 2015

  25. [25]

    Low-rank sparse fully-connected tensor network for tensor completion

    Jinshi Yu, Zhifu Li, Ge Ma, Jingwen Wang, Tao Zou, and Guoxu Zhou. Low-rank sparse fully-connected tensor network for tensor completion. Pattern Recognition, 158: 0 111000, 2025

  26. [26]

    Novel methods for multilinear data completion and de-noising based on tensor-svd

    Zemin Zhang, Gregory Ely, Shuchin Aeron, Ning Hao, and Misha Kilmer. Novel methods for multilinear data completion and de-noising based on tensor-svd. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3842--3849, 2014

  27. [27]

    Tensor Ring Decomposition

    Qibin Zhao, Guoxu Zhou, Shengli Xie, Liqing Zhang, and Andrzej Cichocki. Tensor ring decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05535, 2016

  28. [28]

    Nonlocal patch-based fully connected tensor network decomposition for multispectral image inpainting

    Wen-Jie Zheng, Xi-Le Zhao, Yu-Bang Zheng, and Zhi-Feng Pang. Nonlocal patch-based fully connected tensor network decomposition for multispectral image inpainting. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19: 0 1--5, 2021 a

  29. [29]

    Provable stochastic algorithm for large-scale fully-connected tensor network decomposition

    Wen-Jie Zheng, Xi-Le Zhao, Yu-Bang Zheng, and Ting-Zhu Huang. Provable stochastic algorithm for large-scale fully-connected tensor network decomposition. Journal of Scientific Computing, 98 0 (1): 0 16, 2024 a

  30. [30]

    Fully-connected tensor network decomposition and its application to higher-order tensor completion

    Yu-Bang Zheng, Ting-Zhu Huang, Xi-Le Zhao, Qibin Zhao, and Tai-Xiang Jiang. Fully-connected tensor network decomposition and its application to higher-order tensor completion. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 11071--11078, 2021 b

  31. [31]

    SVDinsTN : A tensor network paradigm for efficient structure search from regularized modeling perspective

    Yu-Bang Zheng, Xi-Le Zhao, Junhua Zeng, Chao Li, Qibin Zhao, Heng-Chao Li, and Ting-Zhu Huang. SVDinsTN : A tensor network paradigm for efficient structure search from regularized modeling perspective. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26254--26263, 2024 b

  32. [32]

    Tensor factorization for low-rank tensor completion

    Pan Zhou, Canyi Lu, Zhouchen Lin, and Chao Zhang. Tensor factorization for low-rank tensor completion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27 0 (3): 0 1152--1163, 2018