pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02955 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-02 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum hypergraph states: a review

Vin\'icius Salem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum hypergraph statesgraph statesmultipartite entanglementquantum informationdiscrete-variablecontinuous-variablequantum computation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum hypergraph states generalize graph states by supporting hyperedges that connect multiple qubits at once.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews quantum hypergraph states as a direct extension of graph states that incorporates higher-order connections to create genuine multipartite entanglement. It gathers the core definitions and surveys the documented uses of these states in quantum information tasks. A sympathetic reader cares because the added flexibility of hyperedges opens routes to entanglement structures that pairwise graph states cannot produce. The review assembles work on both discrete-variable and continuous-variable realizations to show implementation progress.

Core claim

Quantum hypergraph states emerged in the literature as a generalization of graph states, and since then, considerable progress has been made toward implementing this class of genuine multipartite entangled states for quantum information and computation. The review covers the definition of hypergraph states and their main applications so far, both in discrete-variable and continuous-variable quantum information.

What carries the argument

Hypergraph states: multipartite entangled quantum states generated from hypergraphs whose hyperedges specify multi-qubit controlled-phase operations that generalize the pairwise edges of graph states.

Load-bearing premise

The review accurately and comprehensively captures the main definitions and applications without significant omissions from the existing literature on hypergraph states.

What would settle it

An exhaustive literature search that identifies a major definition, property, or application of hypergraph states omitted from the review would show the coverage is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02955 by Vin\'icius Salem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hypergraphs are generalizations of graphs. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the correspondence between a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of multi-hypergraph states equiva [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Randomization procedure for the three-qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Randomization procedure for the four-qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the stabilizer operators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Local unitary equivalence between hypergraph states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of local equivalence of two five-qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hypergraph corresponding to the REW state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic illustration of a hypergraph state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum hypergraph states emerged in the literature as a generalization of graph states, and since then, considerable progress has been made toward implementing this class of genuine multipartite entangled states for quantum information and computation. Here, we review the definition of hypergraph states and their main applications so far, both in discrete-variable and continuous-variable quantum information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of quantum hypergraph states, presented as a generalization of graph states. It summarizes their definition and surveys main applications in both discrete-variable and continuous-variable quantum information and computation, emphasizing progress toward implementing genuine multipartite entangled states.

Significance. If the coverage is accurate and reasonably comprehensive, the review would provide a useful consolidation of the literature on hypergraph states for researchers in quantum information. The explicit treatment of both DV and CV regimes is a positive feature that could help bridge sub-communities working on multipartite entanglement.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract states that the review covers 'the definition of hypergraph states and their main applications so far,' but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement in the introduction or conclusion about the criteria used to select which applications are 'main' versus peripheral.
  2. [References] Several citations appear in the text without corresponding entries in the reference list (e.g., early works on hypergraph states in the continuous-variable section); please verify completeness of the bibliography.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for highlighting its potential utility in consolidating the literature on quantum hypergraph states while bridging discrete-variable and continuous-variable communities. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this review paper

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing the definition of quantum hypergraph states as a generalization of graph states along with their applications in discrete- and continuous-variable settings. No new theorems, derivations, equations, or quantitative predictions are asserted; the structure is purely descriptive and rests on external citations from the existing literature. As such, there are no load-bearing steps that could reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs, and the central claim remains independent of any internal circular chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; it introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities and instead summarizes concepts already present in the quantum information literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5326 in / 940 out tokens · 70019 ms · 2026-05-17T02:00:32.202366+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

213 extracted references · 213 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?

    Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”. Phys. Rev.47, 777 (1935)

    work page 1935

  2. [2]

    Evidence for the quantum na- ture of light

    DF Walls. “Evidence for the quantum na- ture of light”. Nature280, 451–454 (1979)

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    Discussion of prob- ability relations between separated sys- tems

    E. Schrödinger. “Discussion of prob- ability relations between separated sys- tems”. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society31, 555–563 (1935)

    work page 1935

  4. [4]

    Quantenverschränkung

    Nicolas Gisin. “Quantenverschränkung”. Der unbegreifliche Zufall: Nichtlokalität, Teleportation und weitere Seltsamkeiten der QuantenphysikPages 83–99 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox

    John S Bell. “On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox”. Physics1, 195 (1964)

    work page 1964

  6. [6]

    Entanglement in indistin- guishable particle systems

    F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, F. Franchini, and U. Marzolino. “Entanglement in indistin- guishable particle systems”. Physics Re- ports878, 1–27 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Useful entanglement can be extracted from all nonseparable states

    Lluís Masanes. “Useful entanglement can be extracted from all nonseparable states”. Journal of mathematical physics49(2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Efficient generation of graph states for quantum computation

    SR Clark, C Moura Alves, and D Jaksch. “Efficient generation of graph states for quantum computation”. New Journal of Physics7, 124 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Quantum cryp- tography

    Nicolas Gisin, Grégoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden. “Quantum cryp- tography”. Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 145– 195 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Quan- tum error correction

    Daniel A Lidar and Todd A Brun. “Quan- tum error correction”. Cambridge univer- sity press. (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Statistical properties of the quantum internet

    Samuraí Brito, Askery Canabarro, Rafael Chaves, and Daniel Cavalcanti. “Statistical properties of the quantum internet”. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 210501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Quantum metrology

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. “Quantum metrology”. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Unitary entanglement construction in hierarchical networks

    Aniruddha Bapat, Zachary Eldredge, James R. Garrison, Abhinav Deshpande, Frederic T. Chong, and Alexey V. Gor- shkov. “Unitary entanglement construction in hierarchical networks”. Phys. Rev. A 98, 062328 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Quan- tum computation and quantum informa- tion

    IsaacL.ChuangMichaelA.Nielsen. “Quan- tum computation and quantum informa- tion”. Cambridge University Pr. (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Maximally entangled multi- partite states: a brief survey

    M Enríquez, I Wintrowicz, and Karol Zy- czkowski. “Maximally entangled multi- partite states: a brief survey”. Jour- nal of Physics: Conference Series698, 012003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Generation of cluster states

    Ping Dong, Zheng-Yuan Xue, Ming Yang, and Zhuo-Liang Cao. “Generation of cluster states”. Phys. Rev. A73, 033818 (2006). 22

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Multiparty entanglement in graph states

    M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H. J. Briegel. “Multiparty entanglement in graph states”. Phys. Rev. A69, 062311 (2004)

    work page 2004

  18. [18]

    A one-way quantum computer

    Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel. “A one-way quantum computer”. Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188–5191 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Experi- mental one-way quantum computing

    Philip Walther, Kevin J Resch, Terry Rudolph, Emmanuel Schenck, Harald We- infurter, Vlatko Vedral, Markus As- pelmeyer, and Anton Zeilinger. “Experi- mental one-way quantum computing”. Na- ture434, 169–176 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    The theory of graphs

    Claude Berge. “The theory of graphs”. Courier Corporation. (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Graphs and hypergraphs

    Claude Berge. “Graphs and hypergraphs”. North-Holland Pub. Co.American Elsevier Pub. Co. (1973)

    work page 1973

  22. [22]

    Encoding hypergraphs into quantum states

    Ri Qu, Juan Wang, Zong-shang Li, and Yan-ru Bao. “Encoding hypergraphs into quantum states”. Phys. Rev. A87, 022311 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom

    Philip Thomas, Leonardo Ruscio, Olivier Morin, and Gerhard Rempe. “Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom”. Nature608, 677–681 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Scal- able generation of graph-state entangle- ment through realistic linear optics

    T. P. Bodiya and L.-M. Duan. “Scal- able generation of graph-state entangle- ment through realistic linear optics”. Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 143601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Quantum hypergraph states

    M Rossi, M Huber, D Bruß, and C Macchi- avello. “Quantum hypergraph states”. New J. Phys.15, 113022 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Demonstration of hypergraph-state quantum information processing

    Jieshan Huang, Xudong Li, Xiaojiong Chen, Chonghao Zhai, Yun Zheng, Yulin Chi, Yan Li, Qiongyi He, Qihuang Gong, and Jianwei Wang. “Demonstration of hypergraph-state quantum information processing”. Nature Communications15, 2601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Represen- tations of hypergraph states with neural networks

    Ying Yang and Huaixin Cao. “Represen- tations of hypergraph states with neural networks”. Communications in Theoretical Physics73, 105103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Spin gases: Quantum en- tanglement driven by classical kinematics

    J. Calsamiglia, L. Hartmann, W. Dür, and H.-J. Briegel. “Spin gases: Quantum en- tanglement driven by classical kinematics”. Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 180502 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Entanglement ofπ–locally-maximally-entangleable states and the satisfiability problem

    Adi Makmal, Markus Tiersch, Vedran Dun- jko, and Shengjun Wu. “Entanglement ofπ–locally-maximally-entangleable states and the satisfiability problem”. Phys. Rev. A90, 042308 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Absolutely maximally entangled states: existence and applications

    Wolfram Helwig and Wei Cui. “Absolutely maximally entangled states: existence and applications” (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing

    Wolfram Helwig, Wei Cui, José Igna- cio Latorre, Arnau Riera, and Hoi-Kwong Lo. “Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing”. Phys. Rev. A86, 052335 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Multiparticle entanglement

    HA Carteret, N Linden, S Popescu, and A Sudbery. “Multiparticle entanglement”. Foundations of Physics29, 527–552 (1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correctingcodes, andentan- gling power of quantum evolutions

    A. J. Scott. “Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correctingcodes, andentan- gling power of quantum evolutions”. Phys. Rev. A69, 052330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Absolutelymaximallyentangledstates of seven qubits do not exist

    Felix Huber, Otfried Gühne, and Jens Siew- ert. “Absolutelymaximallyentangledstates of seven qubits do not exist”. Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 200502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Quantum computation with topological codes: from qubit to topologi- cal fault-tolerance

    Keisuke Fujii. “Quantum computation with topological codes: from qubit to topologi- cal fault-tolerance”. Volume 8. Springer. (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Experimental bell- state analysis

    Harald Weinfurter. “Experimental bell- state analysis”. Europhysics Letters25, 559 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    Quantum entanglement

    Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. “Quantum entanglement”. Rev. Modern Phys.81, 865–942 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Tripartite entangle- ment: Foundations and applications

    Márcio M. Cunha, Alejandro Fonseca, and Edilberto O. Silva. “Tripartite entangle- ment: Foundations and applications”. Uni- verse5, 209 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Taming multiparticle entanglement

    Bastian Jungnitsch, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried Gühne. “Taming multiparticle entanglement”. Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 190502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Separability criterion for den- sity matrices

    Asher Peres. “Separability criterion for den- sity matrices”. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413– 1415 (1996). 23

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Quantum secret sharing

    Mark Hillery, Vladimír Bužek, and An- dré Berthiaume. “Quantum secret sharing”. Phys. Rev. A59, 1829–1834 (1999)

    work page 1999

  42. [42]

    Detec- tion of high-dimensional genuine multipar- tite entanglement of mixed states

    Marcus Huber, Florian Mintert, Andreas Gabriel, and Beatrix C. Hiesmayr. “Detec- tion of high-dimensional genuine multipar- tite entanglement of mixed states”. Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 210501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Detect- ing genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements

    Géza Tóth and Otfried Gühne. “Detect- ing genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060501 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    On the spectrum of hy- pergraphs

    Anirban Banerjee. “On the spectrum of hy- pergraphs”. Linear Algebra and its Appli- cations614, 82–110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Development of hypergraph theory

    L Wang, EK Egorova, and AV Mokryakov. “Development of hypergraph theory”. Jour- nal of Computer and Systems Sciences In- ternational57, 109–114 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Spectra of uniform hypergraphs

    Joshua Cooper and Aaron Dutle. “Spectra of uniform hypergraphs”. Linear Algebra and its applications436, 3268–3292 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Applications of hypergraph theory: a brief overview

    Alain Bretto. “Applications of hypergraph theory: a brief overview”. Hypergraph the- ory: An introductionPages 111–116 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Optimisation and hyper- graph theory

    Claude Berge. “Optimisation and hyper- graph theory”. European journal of opera- tional research46, 297–303 (1990)

    work page 1990

  49. [49]

    Introduction to graph and hypergraph theory

    Vitaly Ivanovich Voloshin. “Introduction to graph and hypergraph theory”. (No Ti- tle) (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Entanglement and nonclas- sical properties of hypergraph states

    Otfried Gühne, Martí Cuquet, Frank ES Steinhoff, Tobias Moroder, Matteo Rossi, Dagmar Bruß, Barbara Kraus, and Chiara Macchiavello. “Entanglement and nonclas- sical properties of hypergraph states”. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 335303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    A short introduction to kolmogorov complexity

    Volker Nannen. “A short introduction to kolmogorov complexity” (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Hypergraph theory

    Alain Bretto. “Hypergraph theory”. Springer. (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Hypergraphs: an intro- duction and review

    Xavier Ouvrard. “Hypergraphs: an intro- duction and review” (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    On adjacency and e-adjacency in general hypergraphs: Towards a new e-adjacency tensor

    X. Ouvrard, J.M. Le Goff, and S. Marchand-Maillet. “On adjacency and e-adjacency in general hypergraphs: Towards a new e-adjacency tensor”. Elec- tronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics70, 71–76 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Alignment and integration of complex net- works by hypergraph-based spectral clus- tering

    Tom Michoel and Bruno Nachtergaele. “Alignment and integration of complex net- works by hypergraph-based spectral clus- tering”. Phys. Rev. E86, 056111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Spectra of general hyper- graphs

    Anirban Banerjee, Arnab Char, and Bib- hash Mondal. “Spectra of general hyper- graphs”. Linear Algebra and its Applica- tions518, 14–30 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Subgraph centrality and clus- tering in complex hyper-networks

    Ernesto Estrada and Juan A Rodríguez- Velázquez. “Subgraph centrality and clus- tering in complex hyper-networks”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions364, 581–594 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Complex hypergraphs

    Alexei Vazquez. “Complex hypergraphs”. Phys. Rev. E107, 024316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Hy- pergraph categories

    Brendan Fong and David I Spivak. “Hy- pergraph categories”. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra223, 4746–4777 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    En- tanglement in graph states and its appli- cations

    M.Hein, W.Dür, J.Eisert, R.Raussendorf, M. Van den Nest, and H.-J. Briegel. “En- tanglement in graph states and its appli- cations”. In Quantum Computers, Algo- rithms and Chaos. Volume 162, pages 115–

    work page

  61. [61]

    IOS Press

    City (2006). IOS Press. arXiv:quant- ph/0602096

    work page arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    En- tanglement of graph states of spin system withisinginteractionanditsquantifyingon ibm’s quantum computer

    Kh.P. Gnatenko and V.M. Tkachuk. “En- tanglement of graph states of spin system withisinginteractionanditsquantifyingon ibm’s quantum computer”. Physics Letters A396, 127248 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Low-overhead tailoring and learn- ing of noise in graph states

    Guedong Park, Jinzhao Sun, and Hyunseok Jeong. “Low-overhead tailoring and learn- ing of noise in graph states” (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Quantum computa- tional universality of hypergraph states with pauli-x and z basis measurements

    Yuki Takeuchi, Tomoyuki Morimae, and Masahito Hayashi. “Quantum computa- tional universality of hypergraph states with pauli-x and z basis measurements”. Sci. Rep.9, 1–14 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Changing the circuit-depth complexity of measurement- based quantum computation with hy- pergraph states

    Mariami Gachechiladze, Otfried Gühne, and Akimasa Miyake. “Changing the circuit-depth complexity of measurement- based quantum computation with hy- pergraph states”. Phys. Rev. A99, 052304 (2019). 24

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Entan- glement purification of hypergraph states

    Lina Vandré and Otfried Gühne. “Entan- glement purification of hypergraph states”. Phys. Rev. A108, 062417 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Purification to locally maximally entangleable states

    Tatjana Carle, Barbara Kraus, Wolfgang Dür, and Julio I. de Vicente. “Purification to locally maximally entangleable states”. Phys. Rev. A87, 012328 (2013)

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    Entangle- ment of random hypergraph states

    You Zhou and Alioscia Hamma. “Entangle- ment of random hypergraph states”. Phys. Rev. A106, 012410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Optimal preparation of graph states

    Adán Cabello, Lars Eirik Danielsen, An- tonio J López-Tarrida, and José R Por- tillo. “Optimal preparation of graph states”. Phys. Rev. A83, 042314 (2011)

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Universal quan- tum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks

    Ran Finkelstein, Richard Bing-Shiun Tsai, Xiangkai Sun, Pascal Scholl, Su Direkci, Tuvia Gefen, Joonhee Choi, Adam L Shaw, and Manuel Endres. “Universal quan- tum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks”. Nature634, 321– 327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Repeat-until-success linear optics distributed quantum comput- ing

    Yuan Liang Lim, Almut Beige, and Leong Chuan Kwek. “Repeat-until-success linear optics distributed quantum comput- ing”. Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 030505 (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    Spectra of signless normalized laplace operators for hypergraphs

    Eleonora Andreotti and Raffaella Mulas. “Spectra of signless normalized laplace operators for hypergraphs”. Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applica- tions (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Error-protected qubits in a sil- icon photonic chip

    CaterinaVigliar, StefanoPaesani, Yunhong Ding, Jeremy C Adcock, Jianwei Wang, Sam Morley-Short, Davide Bacco, Leif K Oxenløwe, MarkGThompson, JohnGRar- ity, et al. “Error-protected qubits in a sil- icon photonic chip”. Nat. Phys.17, 1137– 1143 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Programmable four- photon graph states on a silicon chip

    Jeremy C Adcock, Caterina Vigliar, Raf- faele Santagati, Joshua W Silverstone, and Mark G Thompson. “Programmable four- photon graph states on a silicon chip”. Na- ture communications10, 3528 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    Chip-based pho- tonic graph states

    Jieshan Huang, Xiaojiong Chen, Xudong Li, and Jianwei Wang. “Chip-based pho- tonic graph states”. AAPPS Bulletin33, 14 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement

    Manuel Erhard, Mario Krenn, and Anton Zeilinger. “Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement”. Nature Reviews Physics2, 365–381 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Multipartite entan- glement in qudit hypergraph states

    Daniele Malpetti, Alfredo Bellisario, and Chiara Macchiavello. “Multipartite entan- glement in qudit hypergraph states”. Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical55, 415301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Qudit hypergraph states

    F. E. S. Steinhoff, C. Ritz, N. I. Miklin, and O. Gühne. “Qudit hypergraph states”. Phys. Rev. A95, 052340 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Qu- dit hypergraph states and their properties

    Fei-Lei Xiong, Yi-Zheng Zhen, Wen-Fei Cao, Kai Chen, and Zeng-Bing Chen. “Qu- dit hypergraph states and their properties”. Phys. Rev. A97, 012323 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Quantum multigraph states and mul- tihypergraph states

    Xiao-Dong Zhang, Bin-Bin Cai, and Song Lin. “Quantum multigraph states and mul- tihypergraph states”. Phys. Rev. A109, 062407 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.