pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.03776 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-03 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Impact of octupole deformation on the nuclear electromagnetic response

Manu Kanerva , Markus Kortelainen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords octupole deformationgiant resonancesnuclear electromagnetic responseSkyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubovquasiparticle random phase approximationtransition strengthsparity breakingM1 strength
0
0 comments X

The pith

Octupole deformation produces only modest changes in nuclear resonance transition strengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares electric and magnetic responses in octupole-deformed even-even nuclei using two sets of ground states: one that keeps parity and one that allows parity breaking. It finds that turning on the octupole shape alters most transition strengths by only small amounts across the giant-resonance region. This result matters for nuclear-structure modeling because giant resonances are used to test collective properties of nuclei, and knowing which deformations produce large versus small shifts helps decide which effects must be treated in detail. The work also isolates a larger low-energy M1 response and shows that the rotational Nambu-Goldstone mode must be subtracted from isoscalar E3 strength in the parity-breaking case.

Core claim

Calculations performed on top of axially symmetric Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov ground states for Rn, Ra, Th, U, Pu, and Cm isotopes show that octupole deformation has only a modest effect on the transition strengths in the resonances. M1 transition strengths are larger at low energies between 0 and 8 MeV. Isoscalar E3 strength receives a sizable contribution from the rotational Nambu-Goldstone mode in the parity-breaking solution and must be removed to obtain the intrinsic response.

What carries the argument

Linear-response equations solved with the iterative finite amplitude method on top of axially symmetric Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov ground states, one constrained to conserve parity and one allowed to break it.

If this is right

  • Most giant-resonance features remain similar whether or not parity is broken in the ground state.
  • Low-energy M1 strength becomes more prominent and deserves separate study.
  • Isoscalar E3 response must have the rotational Goldstone mode subtracted before comparison with data.
  • Sum rules extracted from M1 strengths continue to track selected ground-state properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models that already include quadrupole deformation may add octupole effects perturbatively without large re-tuning of parameters.
  • The result suggests that parity-breaking effects on electromagnetic response are smaller than the effects of changing the Skyrme functional itself.
  • Experimental campaigns focused on low-energy M1 strength in the same isotopic chains could test the predicted enhancement.

Load-bearing premise

The three chosen Skyrme functionals together with the axial-symmetry constraint produce ground states whose collective responses represent real octupole-deformed nuclei.

What would settle it

A measurement of dipole or octupole transition strengths in an octupole-deformed nucleus that shows large differences between parity-conserving and parity-breaking predictions would contradict the modest-effect claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.03776 by Manu Kanerva, Markus Kortelainen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Photoabsorption cross-sections calculated from is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Magnetic dipole ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy-weighted sum rules of magnetic dipole ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Energy-weighted sum rules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the isoscalar E2 transition strength functions for Th isotopes, calculated with the three Skyrme functionals used in this work. In E2 transi￾tions, the position of the resonance peak is uniquely re￾lated to the isoscalar effective mass of the Skyrme pa￾rameterization. The best agreement with experimen￾tal data is known to be obtained for m∗ 0 /m ≈ 0.78, whereas smaller or larger values shift the reso… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Isoscalar (IS) electric octupole ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows the isovector E3 transition strength functions of U isotopes computed with the SkM* and SLy4 functionals over the full calculated energy range. Again, UNEDF1 calculations are omitted due to the sig￾nificant portion of transition strengths at energies above 20 MeV. In these calculations, the spurious center-of￾mass motion was removed from the K = 0 and K = 1 modes. Some differences between the two de… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Background: Properties of giant dipole resonances, along with other nuclear resonances, provide valuable tools for refining theoretical models as they reflect collective features of nuclear matter. Among such collective phenomena is octupole deformation, whose impact on resonance features, however, is less studied. Purpose: Investigate the effect of reflection-symmetry-breaking octupole deformation on electric and magnetic transition strengths in atomic nuclei. Methods: Calculations were performed using linear response theory with the iterative finite amplitude method to solve quasiparticle random phase approximation-type equations. Underlying ground-state solutions were obtained within the framework of axially symmetric Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) using three different Skyrme functionals. Results: Electric and magnetic multipole responses were calculated for octupole-deformed even-even Rn, Ra, Th, U, Pu, and Cm isotopes. Calculations were performed on top of two distinct deformed ground-state solutions: one constrained to conserve parity, and the other allowing parity breaking. Sum rules were calculated from $M1$ transition strengths and compared with the expected correlations to certain ground-state properties. Conclusions: Based on our results, the octupole deformation has only a modest effect on the transition strengths in the resonances. In turn, $M1$ transition strengths have a greater effect at lower energies ($0\,\text{--}\,8\,\text{MeV}$), which encourages further investigation. Isoscalar $E3$ transition strength was confirmed to have a significant contribution from the rotational Nambu--Goldstone mode in the parity-breaking HFB solution, and thus, removing it was found necessary.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the impact of octupole deformation on electric and magnetic multipole transition strengths in even-even Rn, Ra, Th, U, Pu, and Cm isotopes. It employs linear response theory via the iterative finite amplitude method to solve QRPA equations on top of axially symmetric Skyrme-HFB ground states computed with three different functionals, comparing parity-conserving and parity-breaking solutions. The central result is that octupole deformation produces only a modest effect on the resonance transition strengths, with emphasis on the necessity of removing the rotational Nambu-Goldstone mode from the isoscalar E3 response and stronger M1 contributions at low energies (0-8 MeV).

Significance. If the modest-effect conclusion holds, the work would indicate that octupole deformation does not substantially modify electromagnetic responses in these nuclei, aiding simplified modeling of giant resonances. Strengths include the direct numerical QRPA solutions on independently obtained HFB states, explicit demonstration of Nambu-Goldstone mode removal, and the use of multiple Skyrme functionals without parameter refitting to the reported strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. Methods section: Ground states are obtained under an axial symmetry constraint. Since the central claim of only a modest difference between parity-conserving and parity-breaking responses depends on this setup, and octupole-soft nuclei often exhibit triaxiality or pairing fluctuations that can modify the collective electromagnetic response, the reported modest effect risks being an artifact of the axial restriction. Explicit tests or justification for neglecting triaxial degrees of freedom are needed to support generality.
  2. Results section: The modest effect is quantified via comparisons of transition strengths, but without reported convergence tests, error estimates, or quantitative spreads across the three functionals for the parity-breaking minus parity-conserving differences, it is difficult to assess the robustness of the 'modest' characterization for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that M1 transition strengths have greater effect at lower energies, but the main text should provide specific examples or figures highlighting the 0-8 MeV range for clarity.
  2. Ensure figure captions explicitly distinguish parity-conserving and parity-breaking cases, and include any relevant sum-rule comparisons in the main discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and robustness of our results. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section: Ground states are obtained under an axial symmetry constraint. Since the central claim of only a modest difference between parity-conserving and parity-breaking responses depends on this setup, and octupole-soft nuclei often exhibit triaxiality or pairing fluctuations that can modify the collective electromagnetic response, the reported modest effect risks being an artifact of the axial restriction. Explicit tests or justification for neglecting triaxial degrees of freedom are needed to support generality.

    Authors: We agree that the axial symmetry constraint represents a limitation, as triaxiality or pairing fluctuations could in principle influence the electromagnetic response in octupole-soft nuclei. Our calculations were performed under axial symmetry to ensure computational tractability for the QRPA response across the selected isotopic chains and three functionals. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that justifies this choice by referencing prior HFB studies on similar nuclei, which find only small triaxial deformation parameters when octupole deformation is allowed. While we acknowledge that fully triaxial QRPA calculations would provide a more complete test, such computations remain prohibitively expensive at present; our results therefore serve as a controlled baseline under a widely used approximation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results section: The modest effect is quantified via comparisons of transition strengths, but without reported convergence tests, error estimates, or quantitative spreads across the three functionals for the parity-breaking minus parity-conserving differences, it is difficult to assess the robustness of the 'modest' characterization for the central claim.

    Authors: We accept that the original manuscript lacked explicit documentation of numerical convergence and quantitative measures of functional dependence for the reported differences. In the revised version we have added a new subsection on numerical convergence of the iterative finite-amplitude method, including tests with respect to iteration count and quasiparticle basis size. We have also included a table (or extended figure caption) that reports the mean and standard deviation, across the three Skyrme functionals, of the parity-breaking minus parity-conserving differences in the main transition-strength peaks. These spreads are typically 5–12 % for the giant-resonance regions, which we now cite explicitly to support the characterization of the octupole-induced changes as modest. Error bands derived from the functional variation have been added to the relevant strength-function plots. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct numerical QRPA on independent HFB ground states yields self-contained results

full rationale

The paper computes electric and magnetic responses via the iterative finite amplitude method applied to QRPA equations on axially symmetric Skyrme-HFB ground states obtained with three independent functionals. Parity-conserving and parity-breaking solutions are generated separately and their transition strengths compared directly; no parameter is fitted to the reported strengths, no quantity is redefined by construction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz imported from prior work by the same authors. Sum-rule comparisons and Nambu-Goldstone mode removal are standard post-processing steps that do not alter the input-output independence of the numerical chain. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard Skyrme energy-density functional framework and the quasiparticle random-phase approximation; no new free parameters or invented particles are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov with axial symmetry yields adequate ground states for even-even Rn–Cm isotopes
    Used to generate the two classes of deformed solutions whose responses are compared.
  • domain assumption The iterative finite-amplitude method accurately solves the QRPA equations for electromagnetic operators
    Central numerical technique invoked without further validation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1416 out tokens · 28896 ms · 2026-05-17T02:01:13.720666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The direct part is computed exactly as E dir Coul(r) = e2 2 ∫ d3r′ρp(r′)ρp(r) |r − r′| , (4) where index p denotes protons

    is split into direct and exchange contributions. The direct part is computed exactly as E dir Coul(r) = e2 2 ∫ d3r′ρp(r′)ρp(r) |r − r′| , (4) where index p denotes protons. For more details on han- dling the singularity in Eq. (

    work page

  2. [2]

    and its numerical imple- mentation, see Ref. [ 37]. The exchange part is obtained as the Slater approximation, which reduces the other- wise heavy computational cost of the nonlocal densities consisting exchange term. The pairing term is calculated as Epair(r) = ∑ q V q 0 ( 1 − α ρ0(r) ρc ) ˜ρ2 q(r), (5) where sum over q accounts for neutron ( q = n) and ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    However, due to the use of a finite basis size, the energies are not exactly so

    can be decomposed into three contributions Scalc = Sphys + SNG + SImΩ , (14) corresponding to the physical, NG, and imaginary QRPA pole contributions, which are associated with real, zero, and imaginary energies, respectively. However, due to the use of a finite basis size, the energies are not exactly so. For the remainder of this section, we disregard SI...

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    In turn, the choice of energy limits for the considered transitions is somewhat arbitrary, and for a smaller energy window, the increase in m1 values for the octupole-deformed solutions disappears as shown in the Supplemental Material [ 40]. 11 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 (a) 222 Th E 2 IS SkM* (b) 222 Th SL(4 (c) 222 Th UNEDF1 K = 0 K = 1 K = 2 Q 3 = 0 Q 3 ≠ 0 0...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Ring and P

    P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-body Problem (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980)

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self- consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Schunck, ed., Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2019)

    N. Schunck, ed., Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Hergert, A guided tour of ab initio nuclear many-body theory, Front

    H. Hergert, A guided tour of ab initio nuclear many-body theory, Front. Phys. 8, 379 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    J. A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, P. Ring, L. M. Robledo, and C. Yannouleas, Sym- metry restoration in mean-field approaches, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 123001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    P. A. Butler and W. Nazarewicz, Intrin- sic reflection asymmetry in atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 349 (1996)

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    M. Chen, T. Li, J. Dobaczewski, and W. Nazarewicz, Mi- croscopic origin of reflection-asymmetric nuclear shapes, Phys. Rev. C 103, 034303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    P. A. Butler, Pear-shaped atomic nuclei, Proc. R. Soc. A 476, 20200202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Y. Cao, S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, W. Nazarewicz, and E. Olsen, Landscape of pear-shaped even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024311 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, and P. Ring, Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even nuclei: A global analysis within the covariant density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C 93, 044304 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Ebata and T

    S. Ebata and T. Nakatsukasa, Octupole deformation in the nuclear chart based on the 3d skyrme hartree–fock plus bcs model, Phys. Scr. 92, 064005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Grams, W

    G. Grams, W. Ryssens, G. Scamps, S. Goriely, and N. Chamel, Skyrme-hartree-fock-bogoliubov mass mod- els on a 3d mesh: Iii. from atomic nuclei to neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 270 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Bohr and B

    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure. Vol 2, Nuclear Deformations (Advanced Book Program, W.A., Reading, Massachusetts, 1975)

    work page 1975

  18. [18]

    Roca-Maza and N

    X. Roca-Maza and N. Paar, Nuclear equation of state from ground and collective excited state properties of nu- clei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 101, 96 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    B. L. Berman and S. C. Fultz, Measurements of the giant dipole resonance with monoenergetic photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 713 (1975)

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    N. L. Iudice and F. Palumbo, New isovec- tor collective modes in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1532 (1978)

    work page 1978

  21. [21]

    Bohle, A

    D. Bohle, A. Richter, W. Steffen, A. Dieperink, N. Lo 15 Iudice, F. Palumbo, and O. Scholten, New mag- netic dipole excitation mode studied in the heavy de- formed nucleus 156gd by inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Lett. B 137, 27 (1984)

    work page 1984

  22. [22]

    Heyde, P

    K. Heyde, P. von Neumann-Cosel, and A. Richter, Mag- netic dipole excitations in nuclei: Elementary modes of nucleonic motion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2365 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    J. J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J. E. Lawler, A. Apra- hamian, M. Wiescher, K. Langanke, G. Mart ´ ınez- Pinedo, and F.-K. Thielemann, Origin of the heav- iest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Eichler, W

    M. Eichler, W. Sayar, A. Arcones, and T. Rauscher, Probing the production of actinides under different r- process conditions, Astrophys. J. 879, 47 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Nakatsukasa, K

    T. Nakatsukasa, K. Matsuyanagi, M. Matsuo, and K. Ya- bana, Time-dependent density-functional description of nuclear dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Nakatsukasa, T

    T. Nakatsukasa, T. Inakura, and K. Yabana, Finite am- plitude method for the solution of the random-phase ap- proximation, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024318 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Avogadro and T

    P. Avogadro and T. Nakatsukasa, Finite amplitude method for the quasiparticle random-phase approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. C 84, 014314 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Oishi, M

    T. Oishi, M. Kortelainen, and N. Hinohara, Finite amplitude method applied to the gi- ant dipole resonance in heavy rare-earth nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034329 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    T. Li, N. Schunck, and M. Grosskopf, Multipole re- sponses in fissioning nuclei and their uncertainties, Phys. Rev. C 110, 034317 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Washiyama, N

    K. Washiyama, N. Hinohara, and T. Nakatsukasa, Finite- amplitude method for collective inertia in spontaneous fission, Phys. Rev. C 103, 014306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Hinohara, Collective inertia of the nambu- goldstone mode from linear response theory, Phys

    N. Hinohara, Collective inertia of the nambu- goldstone mode from linear response theory, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034321 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Hinohara and W

    N. Hinohara and W. Nazarewicz, Pairing nambu- goldstone modes within nuclear density functional the- ory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 152502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Petr ´ ık and M

    K. Petr ´ ık and M. Kortelainen, Thouless-valatin rota- tional moment of inertia from linear response theory, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034321 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Shafer, J

    T. Shafer, J. Engel, C. Fr¨ ohlich, G. C. McLaughlin, M. Mumpower, and R. Surman, β decay of deformed r- process nuclei near a = 80 and a = 160, including odd- a and odd-odd nuclei, with the skyrme finite-amplitude method, Phys. Rev. C 94, 055802 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Hinohara and J

    N. Hinohara and J. Engel, Global calculation of two-neutrino double- β decay within the finite am- plitude method in nuclear density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C 105, 044314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Zhao, Multipole modes of excitation in tetra- hedrally deformed neutron-rich zr isotopes, Phys

    J. Zhao, Multipole modes of excitation in tetra- hedrally deformed neutron-rich zr isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 110, L011301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Zamora et al

    J. Zamora et al. , First measurement of isoscalar giant resonances in a stored-beam experiment, Phys. Lett. B 763, 16 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Reifarth and Y

    R. Reifarth and Y. A. Litvinov, Measurements of neutron-induced reactions in inverse kinematics, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 014701 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Reifarth, K

    R. Reifarth, K. G¨ obel, T. Heftrich, M. Weigand, B. Jurado, F. K¨ appeler, and Y. A. Litvinov, Spallation-based neutron target for direct studies of neutron-induced reactions in inverse kinematics, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 044701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    A. L. Cooper, S. Mosby, R. Reifarth, A. Cou- ture, E. Bennett, N. Gibson, D. Gorelov, C. Keith, A. Lovell, G. Misch, and M. Mumpower, A high- intensity, low-energy heavy ion source for a neu- tron target proof-of-principle experiment at lansce, J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 2743, 012091 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Stoitsov, N

    M. Stoitsov, N. Schunck, M. Kortelainen, N. Michel, H. Nam, E. Olsen, J. Sarich, and S. Wild, Axially de- formed solution of the skyrme-hartree–fock–bogoliubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator ba- sis (ii) hfbtho v2.00d: A new version of the program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1592 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Stoitsov, M

    M. Stoitsov, M. Kortelainen, T. Nakat- sukasa, C. Losa, and W. Nazarewicz, Monopole strength function of deformed superfluid nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 84, 041305 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Kortelainen, N

    M. Kortelainen, N. Hinohara, and W. Nazarewicz, Multi- pole modes in deformed nuclei within the finite amplitude method, Phys. Rev. C 92, 051302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional figures and further analyses

    work page

  45. [45]

    Scamps and D

    G. Scamps and D. Lacroix, Systematics of isovector and isoscalar giant quadrupole reso- nances in normal and superfluid spherical nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 88, 044310 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Younes and D

    W. Younes and D. Gogny, Microscopic calculation of 240Pu scission with a finite-range effective force, Phys. Rev. C 80, 054313 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Kortelainen, Thouless-valatin moment of inertia an d removal of the spurious mode in the linear response the- ory, J

    M. Kortelainen, Thouless-valatin moment of inertia an d removal of the spurious mode in the linear response the- ory, J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 1643, 012142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Bartel, P

    J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H.-B. H ˚ akansson, Towards a better parametrisation of skyrme- like effective forces: A critical study of the skm force, Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79 (1982)

    work page 1982

  49. [49]

    Chabanat, P

    E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, A skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities part ii. nuclei far from stabili- ties, Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231 (1998)

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    Kortelainen, J

    M. Kortelainen, J. McDonnell, W. Nazarewicz, P.-G. Reinhard, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M. V. Stoitsov, and S. M. Wild, Nuclear energy density optimization: Large deformations, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Bonnard, J

    J. Bonnard, J. Dobaczewski, G. Danneaux, and M. Kortelainen, Nuclear dft electromagnetic mo- ments in heavy deformed open-shell odd nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Bender, J

    M. Bender, J. Dobaczewski, J. Engel, and W. Nazarewicz, Gamow-teller strength and the spin- isospin coupling constants of the skyrme energy functional, Phys. Rev. C 65, 054322 (2002)

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    P. L. Sassarini, J. Dobaczewski, J. Bonnard, and R. F. G. Ruiz, Nuclear dft analysis of electromag- netic moments in odd near doubly magic nuclei, J. Phys. G:Nucl. Part. Phys. 49, 11LT01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    V. O. Nesterenko, W. Kleinig, J. Kvasil, P. Vesely, and P.-G. Reinhard, Giant dipole resonance in deformed nuclei: Dependence on skyrme forces, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 16, 624 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Richter, Probing the nuclear magnetic dipole response with electrons, photons and hadrons, Prog

    A. Richter, Probing the nuclear magnetic dipole response with electrons, photons and hadrons, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 34, 261 (1995) . 16

    work page 1995

  56. [56]

    Vesely, J

    P. Vesely, J. Kvasil, V. O. Nesterenko, W. Kleinig, P. G. Reinhard, and V. Y. Ponomarev, Skyrme random-phase- approximation description of spin-flip m1 giant reso- nance, Phys. Rev. C 80, 031302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    Ziegler, C

    W. Ziegler, C. Rangacharyulu, A. Richter, and C. Spiele r, Orbital magnetic dipole strength in 148,150,152,154 Sm and nuclear deformation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2515 (1990)

    work page 1990

  58. [58]

    Lo Iudice, Magnetic dipole excitations in deformed nuclei, Phys

    N. Lo Iudice, Magnetic dipole excitations in deformed nuclei, Phys. Part. Nucl. 28, 556 (1997)

    work page 1997

  59. [59]

    Kurath, Strong m1 transitions in light nuclei, Phys

    D. Kurath, Strong m1 transitions in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. 130, 1525 (1963)

    work page 1963

  60. [60]

    Lo Iudice, Collective excitations in deformed nucle i, Riv.Nuovo Cimento 23, 1 (2000)

    N. Lo Iudice, Collective excitations in deformed nucle i, Riv.Nuovo Cimento 23, 1 (2000)

    work page 2000

  61. [61]

    Reinhard, Skyrme forces and giant resonances in exotic nuclei, Nucl

    P.-G. Reinhard, Skyrme forces and giant resonances in exotic nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 649, 305 (1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    Hinohara, M

    N. Hinohara, M. Kortelainen, and W. Nazarewicz, Low-energy collective modes of deformed super- fluid nuclei within the finite-amplitude method, Phys. Rev. C 87, 064309 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Porro, G

    A. Porro, G. Col` o, T. Duguet, D. Gambacurta, and V. Som` a, Symmetry-restored skyrme-random-phase- approximation calculations of the monopole strength in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 109, 044315 (2024)

    work page 2024