Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

A leaky coaxial cable with switchable slots can act as a low-frequency pinching antenna, giving received power that scales as d²/r⁴: strong local gain, fast decay, and reconfigurable links.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 18:28 UTC pith:Q7RHNMZS

load-bearing objection A coherent low-frequency pinching-antenna extension via LCX, but the unvalidated slot-radiation model and an unfair benchmark keep it conditional. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.04979 v2 pith:Q7RHNMZS submitted 2025-12-04 eess.SP

Generalized Pinching-Antenna Systems: A Leaky-Coaxial-Cable Perspective

Kaidi Wang , Zhiguo Ding , Lajos Hanzo This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords leaky coaxial cablepinching antennareconfigurable antennaslot activationchannel modelingpower allocationcoalitional gamelow-frequency communications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper attempts to show that leaky coaxial cables—ordinary, low-cost transmission lines with periodically spaced slots—can serve as low-frequency pinching antennas. The key move is to treat each slot as a switchable magnetic dipole whose radiation pattern is sin(phi), so the received power scales as d²/r⁴ rather than 1/r². That scaling yields strong gain directly beneath an active slot and fast decay away from it, which the authors use for reconfigurable line-of-sight links and interference suppression. On this basis they formulate a sum-rate-maximization problem over user assignment, slot activation, and power allocation, and show via simulation that the resulting system outperforms fixed-antenna benchmarks. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a path to bring pinching-antenna flexibility to the low-frequency bands where dielectric waveguides are too bulky.

Core claim

The paper argues that a leaky coaxial cable with switchable radiating slots is a workable low-frequency realization of a generalized pinching antenna. The channel is modeled in two stages—guided propagation along the cable and slot-to-user radiation—and the radiation term carries a sin(phi)/r factor. Because sin(phi)=d/r, received power scales as d²/r⁴, which is strong near the active slot but decays quickly, giving spatial focusing and interference suppression. The paper further shows analytically that this LCX channel outperforms a fixed-antenna system at high SNR under a stated geometric condition, and that in the high-SNR multi-cable case the serving slot wins whenever it is closer (larg

What carries the argument

The central object is the cascade channel h_{k,m,n}=h_cable*h_rad, where h_rad = (eta * e^{-j2π r/λ} / r) * sin(phi), with phi the elevation angle. This gives received power proportional to d²/(ρ²+d²)². The sin(phi) term is the angular dependence of a magnetic-dipole slot; it is what converts the usual 1/r² free-space decay into 1/r⁴-like decay along the user plane and creates the local-gain/rapid-decay profile. Slot activation (beta_{k,m}) and user assignment (alpha_{k,n}) then select which dipoles radiate, and the optimization decouples into a coalitional game for association/activation and a convex successive-approximation problem for power.

Load-bearing premise

Each slot radiates as an independent magnetic dipole with a sin(phi) pattern, and opening or closing a slot does not alter guided propagation, coupling between slots, or the radiation pattern.

What would settle it

Measure the received power at a user directly beneath an active LCX slot at several horizontal offsets; if it does not follow d²/(ρ²+d²)² scaling—for example, if it decays as 1/r² or varies strongly with frequency—then the magnetic-dipole model and the d²/r⁴ claims are unsupported.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The LCX architecture brings pinching-antenna-style reconfigurable line-of-sight links to low frequencies, where dielectric waveguides are impractical.
  • Because received power scales as d²/r⁴, activating slots yields strong local gain but a small interference footprint, so multiple cables can reuse spectrum with less mutual interference.
  • Closing or opening slots gives on-demand control of the radiated field, at the cost of a trade-off between combining gain and power dilution across active slots.
  • Under the high-SNR condition of Proposition 1, the LCX system beats a conventional fixed antenna in regions whose geometry favors elongated coverage; performance improves with slot density and number of cables.
  • The joint user-assignment/slot-activation/power-allocation problem is solved by a coalitional game plus convex power refinement, and simulations show higher sum rate and lower outage than fixed-antenna benchmarks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The d²/r⁴ profile suggests a physical-layer-security angle: a slot can be aimed so that an eavesdropper farther away in horizontal offset sees much weaker signal than the intended user; the paper notes this but does not quantify secrecy rate.
  • If slot switching is implemented with shutters, the assumption that switching leaves guided propagation unchanged is testable; a prototype measurement of leakage constant with slots open/closed would validate or invalidate the guided-propagation model.
  • The high-SNR result that the closer slot wins suggests a simple nearest-slot scheduling rule may be near-optimal in dense slot deployments, potentially removing the need for the full game-theoretic optimization in practice.
  • The model's angular term sin(phi) is specific to downward-facing slots; a similar treatment could apply to other slot orientations or to cables placed on walls or floors, which would change the focus region but retain the d²/r⁴ structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a downlink LCX-based generalized pinching-antenna system for low-frequency operation. It models guided propagation inside the cable and slot-to-user wireless propagation, derives an effective d^2/r^4 power-scaling law for single-slot links, and formulates a joint user-assignment, slot-activation, and power-allocation problem. A coalitional game and an SCA-based power allocation are proposed, and simulations show throughput and outage gains over a conventional fixed-antenna benchmark.

Significance. If the physical premises hold, the paper offers a plausible low-frequency realization of the pinching-antenna concept and a complete system-level framework: closed-form rate expressions, a geometric interpretation of interference suppression, and tractable algorithms with convergence guarantees. The d^2/r^4 scaling and the angle-dependent radiation model are concrete and falsifiable. However, the central contribution depends critically on an idealized slot-radiation model and on a comparison benchmark that does not isolate the benefit of reconfigurability. The paper's internal algebra also contains an error in the statement of Proposition 1. With validation of the channel model and a fair benchmark, the framework could be a useful contribution to LCX and reconfigurable-antenna research.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II-A, Eq. (2), and footnote 2] The entire framework rests on the assumption that each slot radiates independently as a magnetic dipole with amplitude proportional to sin(phi)/r, and that opening or closing a slot does not change guided propagation, mutual coupling, or the radiation pattern. Footnote 2 explicitly concedes that no physical On/Off mechanism is described, and no full-wave simulation, measurement, or reference validates Eq. (2) for switchable LCX slots. Real LCX slots are coupled apertures on a traveling-wave structure; radiation from upstream slots attenuates the guided signal seen downstream, and periodic slot patterns create frequency-dependent array/leaky-wave effects. This is load-bearing: the d^2/r^4 scaling, Proposition 1, Proposition 2, and all simulation conclusions follow from Eq. (2). The authors should either provide concrete physical or numerical validation (e.g., full-wave simulation of a swi
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (16) and Eqs. (42)-(43)] There is an algebra error in the derivation of Proposition 1. Starting from (42), the inequality is (1+a^2)^(1+1/a^2) >= e(1+b^2)^2. Since a = D/(2d), the left-hand side is (1+D^2/(4d^2))^(1+4d^2/D^2), not (1+D^2/(4d^2))(1+4d^2/D^2). The paper replaces the exponent with a multiplicative factor, which is invalid. Consequently, the condition stated in Proposition 1, Eq. (16), is not equivalent to the preceding derivation. This must be corrected and the proof re-derived; the final condition may change numerical conclusions in Remark 8.
  3. [Sec. II-C, Eq. (15), and Sec. V] The conventional fixed-antenna benchmark is a single antenna located at the center of the region (or, per Sec. V, K*M co-located antennas at the BS). This benchmark does not include any spatial distribution of the radiating elements. The proposed LCX system gains a large advantage simply because slots can be selected close to users, even if the slot-selection mechanism is static. Thus the reported 'substantial performance gains' conflate spatial diversity / distance reduction with reconfigurability. A fair benchmark would be a static LCX with all slots radiating, a randomly fixed slot-activation pattern, or a distributed fixed array with the same number of positions, while the same power and resource allocation algorithms are applied. Without such a comparison, the paper's central claim that controllable slot activation itself provides the benefit is not supported.
  4. [Eq. (12), Sec. II-B] The signal model assumes that each activated slot radiates the full superposed cable signal with an equal power split 1/N_k, and that the guided attenuation h_cable is independent of slot state. This ignores the physical fact that radiation from slots removes power from the guided wave, so the amplitude reaching downstream slots depends on the states of upstream slots. It also neglects mutual coupling between slots. This is not merely a minor modeling choice: the multi-slot combining results, the activation trade-off in Remark 5, and the optimization algorithms all depend on the linear superposition and equal-power-split assumption. The authors should justify this assumption or generalize the model to include coupling and state-dependent guided attenuation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V, simulation setup] The text says 'K×M antennas are deployed at the BS, which is located at the center of the region,' but the analytical benchmark in Eq. (15) is a single antenna at ψ0. Please clarify which benchmark is actually simulated and reconcile the description with the formula.
  2. [Throughout] Some figure captions and text contain minor grammatical issues, e.g., 'As shown Fig. 6(a)' should be 'As shown in Fig. 6(a)'. These do not affect the technical content but should be corrected in revision.
  3. [References] The related work discussion is quite heavily based on self-citations by the same group. A few independent references on LCX slot radiation and switchable radiators would strengthen the physical grounding of the channel model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular step: the d^2/r^4 scaling and propositions are direct algebraic consequences of the stated h_cable × h_rad model, not fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained from the stated model. Eq. (1) and Eq. (2) define h_cable and h_rad; Eq. (4) is their product, and with sin(phi)=d/r the single-slot rate (14) follows by substitution, giving |h|^2 proportional to d^2/r^4 (Remark 7). This is a mathematical consequence of the assumed sin(phi)/r magnetic-dipole pattern, not a target result inserted as an assumption; no constant is fitted to data and no 'prediction' is a renamed fit. Propositions 1 and 2 compare these algebraic rate expressions with the conventional benchmark under stated high-SNR approximations; their proofs in Appendices A and B manipulate the same definitions. The self-citations ([8], [10], [13], [14], [15], [19], [22]) are context or benchmark approximations; none is used as a uniqueness theorem or as the only support for a derived claim, and [28], which supplies the sin(phi) pattern, is from an external group. Footnote 2 frankly states that the physical On/Off mechanism has not been described; that is an implementation/validation gap, not circular reasoning. The simulations exercise the model rather than validating Eq. (2), but the analytic claims reduce only to the stated assumptions, not to their conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an assumed slot-radiation model, an idealized guided-wave model, and a tractability-motivated equal-power-split rule. None of these are fitted to data, but all are unvalidated against hardware or full-wave simulation. The only invented physical element is the switchable slot mechanism, which lacks independent evidence.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Each slot radiates as a magnetic dipole with amplitude proportional to sin(phi), giving h_rad = eta e^{-jkr}/r sin(phi) (Eq. 2).
    Guided by small-loop slot EM theory [28], but unvalidated for periodic LCX slots and for the proposed shutter-based activation.
  • domain assumption Guided propagation in the LCX is a simple attenuating phase-shift line with constant kappa and epsilon_r (Eq. 1), independent of slot activation state.
    Ignores slot loading, reflections, and the fact that opening or closing slots changes the guided-wave field.
  • ad hoc to paper Each activated slot radiates the full superposed cable signal with equal power split 1/N_k (Eq. 12).
    Power division in a real LCX depends on coupling coefficients and slot states; the equal split is chosen for tractability and is not derived from a coupling model or measurement.
  • domain assumption NLoS propagation is a sum of L discrete scatterers with i.i.d. complex gains (Eq. 3).
    A stylized model; no site-specific validation is given for indoor or tunnel scenarios.
  • domain assumption The coalitional game converges to Nash-stable partitions and the SCA power-allocation loop converges from arbitrary initialization.
    Monotonic sum-rate increase is argued for the game, but the SCA convergence and the quality of the Nash-stable solution are not formally established for this specific utility.
invented entities (1)
  • Controllable slot shutter or electronic actuating element integrated at each LCX slot no independent evidence
    purpose: Enables on/off control of radiation slots to realize reconfigurable pinching-antenna operation without active RF chains
    The paper states that the physical mechanism is not explicit in existing studies and proposes a shutter (footnote 2); no prototype, measurement, or EM simulation is provided.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18036 in / 15603 out tokens · 146357 ms · 2026-08-03T18:28:06.186221+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The evolution toward the sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks has flexible reconfigurable antenna architectures capable of adapting their radiation characteristics to the surrounding environment. At the center stage, while waveguide based pinching antennas have been shown to beneficially ameliorate wireless propagation environments, their applications have remained confined to high-frequency scenarios. As a remedy, we propose a downlink generalized pinching-antenna system that adapts this compelling concept to low-frequency operation through a leaky-coaxial-cable (LCX) implementation. By endowing LCX structures with controllable radiation slots, the system inherits the key capabilities of waveguide based pinching antennas. Explicitly, these include reconfigurable line-of-sight (LoS) links, reduced path loss, and flexible deployment, while supporting a practical implementation of the pinching-antenna concept at low frequencies. A twin-stage propagation model is developed for characterizing both the guided transmission and wireless radiation encountered over LoS and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) paths. Analytical results reveal strong local gain, complemented by rapid distance-dependent decay. Hence, we conceive a matching joint optimization framework, which maximizes throughput by harnessing game theoretic association and convex power allocation. Simulation results demonstrate substantial performance gains over conventional fixed-antenna benchmarks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04979 by Kaidi Wang, Lajos Hanzo, Zhiguo Ding.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of the proposed LCX based generalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration of the elevation angle ϕk,m,n between the m-th slot on cable k and user n. k can be formulated as follows: h rad k,m,n = η e −j 2π λ ∥ψn−ψslot k,m∥ ∥ψn − ψ slot k,m∥ sin(ϕk,m,n), (2) where η = c 4πfc , c is the speed of light, fc is the carrier frequency, ∥ψn−ψ slot k,m∥ is the distance between user n and the m-th slot on cable k, and ϕk,m,n is the corresponding elevation angle. As shown in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Influence of NLoS propagation and cable attenuation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Impact of the target rate on the sum rate and outage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of the transmit power on the sum rate, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact of the transmit power on the sum rate and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Impact of the number of users on the sum rate and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Convergence performance of the proposed coalitional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generalized Pinching-Antenna Systems: A Radio-Stripe-Based Realization

    eess.SP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Radio-stripe-based generalized pinching-antenna framework with geometry-guided sparse APU activation reduces total power consumption versus benchmarks in numerical tests.

  2. Age-of-Information Aware Federated Learning with Finite Speed Pinching Antenna

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Finite-speed pinching antennas, moved during local training, jointly optimized with AoI-aware device selection, reduce sum AoI and speed federated learning convergence versus fixed or infinite-speed baselines.

  3. Leaky-Coaxial Pinching-Antenna System with Adjustable Slot Apertures

    eess.SP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Leaky-coaxial pinching-antenna systems with continuous slot aperture adjustment achieve higher sum rates and lower outage probabilities than binary activation or fixed antennas by using quadratic-transform optimizatio...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, Jan. 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2020

    1950

  3. [3]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, June 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313–3351, May 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applications, and research directions,

    T. Wu, K. Zhi, J. Yao, X. Lai, J. Zheng, H. Niu, M. Elkashlan, K.-K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, Z. Dinget al., “Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applications, and research directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03839, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Pinching antenna-using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,

    A. Fukuda, H. Yamamoto, H. Okazaki, Y . Suzuki, and K. Kawai, “Pinching antenna-using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,”NTT DOCOMO Technical J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, Jan. 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, and H. Vincent Poor, “Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  9. [9]

    Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 1–7, Sept. 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    Antenna activation for NOMA as- sisted pinching-antenna systems,

    K. Wang, Z. Ding, and R. Schober, “Antenna activation for NOMA as- sisted pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1526–1530, Mar. 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Pinching antennas: Principles, applica- tions and challenges,

    Z. Yang, N. Wang, Y . Sun, Z. Ding, R. Schober, G. K. Karagiannidis, V . W. Wong, and O. A. Dobre, “Pinching antennas: Principles, applica- tions and challenges,”IEEE Wireless Commun., pp. 1–10, Oct. 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    LoS blockage in pinching-antenna systems: Curse or blessing?

    Z. Ding and H. Vincent Poor, “LoS blockage in pinching-antenna systems: Curse or blessing?”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2798–2802, June 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Pinching-antenna systems with LoS blockages,

    K. Wang, C. Ouyang, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Pinching-antenna systems with LoS blockages,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, Sept. 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Generalized pinching-antenna systems: A tutorial on principles, design strategies, and future directions,

    Y . Xu, J. Cui, Y . Zhu, Z. Ding, T.-H. Chang, R. Schober, V . W. Wong, O. A. Dobre, G. K. Karagiannidis, H. V . Pooret al., “Generalized pinching-antenna systems: A tutorial on principles, design strategies, and future directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14166, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,

    Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, Oct. 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,

    D. Tyrovolas, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, S. Ioannidis, C. K. Liaskos, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., pp. 1–1, Apr. 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Uplink and downlink communications in segmented waveguide-enabled pinching- antenna systems (SW ANs),

    C. Ouyang, H. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Uplink and downlink communications in segmented waveguide-enabled pinching- antenna systems (SW ANs),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10666, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    A low-complexity placement design of pinching-antenna systems,

    X. Xie, F. Fang, Z. Ding, and X. Wang, “A low-complexity placement design of pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1784–1788, May 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Antenna activation and resource allocation in multi-waveguide pinching-antenna systems,

    K. Wang, Z. Ding, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Antenna activation and resource allocation in multi-waveguide pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, Sept. 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    QoS-aware NOMA design for downlink pinching-antenna systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Ding, D. Cai, and V . W. Wong, “QoS-aware NOMA design for downlink pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, Sept. 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Multi- waveguide pinching antennas for ISAC,

    W. Mao, Y . Lu, Y . Xu, B. Ai, O. A. Dobre, and D. Niyato, “Multi- waveguide pinching antennas for ISAC,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., pp. 1–1, Oct. 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Pinching-antenna systems for physical layer security,

    K. Wang, Z. Ding, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Pinching-antenna systems for physical layer security,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, Oct. 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Leaky wave cable with integrated adjacent antennas in office installation,

    S. Myllym ¨aki, “Leaky wave cable with integrated adjacent antennas in office installation,” 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Multi-level modulation in the indoors leaky feeder environment,

    J. Torrance, T. Keller, and L. Hanzo, “Multi-level modulation in the indoors leaky feeder environment,” inProceedings of Vehicular Tech- nology Conference - VTC, vol. 3, 1996, pp. 1554–1558 vol.3

    1996

  25. [25]

    Spatial modulation proposal for 2-by-2 MIMO system using single leaky coaxial cable,

    Y . Hou, S. Dake, Y . Kawai, and S. Denno, “Spatial modulation proposal for 2-by-2 MIMO system using single leaky coaxial cable,” in2023 IEEE 98th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Fall), 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  26. [26]

    Prediction of indoor wireless coverage by leaky coaxial cable using ray tracing,

    S. Morgan, “Prediction of indoor wireless coverage by leaky coaxial cable using ray tracing,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2005–2014, 1999

    2005

  27. [27]

    Theory and analysis of leaky coaxial cables with periodic slots,

    J. H. Wang and K. Mei, “Theory and analysis of leaky coaxial cables with periodic slots,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1723–1732, 2001

    2001

  28. [28]

    New signal and algorithms for 5g/6g high precision train positioning in tunnel with leaky coaxial cable,

    L. Yin, T. Song, Q. Ni, Q. Xiao, Y . Sun, and W. Guo, “New signal and algorithms for 5g/6g high precision train positioning in tunnel with leaky coaxial cable,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 223–238, 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Channel model and performance analysis for MIMO systems with single leaky coaxial cable in tunnel scenarios,

    K. Zhang, G. Zheng, H. Wang, C. Zhang, and X. Yu, “Channel model and performance analysis for MIMO systems with single leaky coaxial cable in tunnel scenarios,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, p. 5776, 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    A proposal of spatial modulation using on/off the slots of leaky coaxial cable,

    K. Nagayama, J. Zhu, P. Hou, Y . Hou, and S. Denno, “A proposal of spatial modulation using on/off the slots of leaky coaxial cable,” in 2022 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech), 2022, pp. 289–290

    2022

  31. [31]

    Genetic algorithm based channel pattern selection for spatial modulation using slots of leaky coaxial cable,

    K. Nagayama, E. Kouda, J. Zhu, Y . Hou, and S. Denno, “Genetic algorithm based channel pattern selection for spatial modulation using slots of leaky coaxial cable,” in2022 25th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC), 2022, pp. 221–225

    2022

  32. [32]

    Han,Game theory in wireless and communication networks: theory, models, and applications

    Z. Han,Game theory in wireless and communication networks: theory, models, and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  33. [33]

    CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,” 2014

    2014

  34. [34]

    Hanzo, T

    L. Hanzo, T. H. Liew, and B. L. Yeap,Turbo coding, turbo equalisation and space-time coding. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2002

    2002

  35. [35]

    Maximiz- ing the geometric mean of user-rates to improve rate-fairness: Proper vs. improper gaussian signaling,

    H. Yu, H. D. Tuan, E. Dutkiewicz, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Maximiz- ing the geometric mean of user-rates to improve rate-fairness: Proper vs. improper gaussian signaling,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 295–309, Jan. 2022

    2022

  36. [36]

    Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,

    W. Zhu, H. D. Tuan, E. Dutkiewicz, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5648–5662, June 2024

    2024

  37. [37]

    Holographic multi-user multi-stream beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,

    ——, “Holographic multi-user multi-stream beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Wireless information and power transfer in cooperative networks with spatially random relays,

    Z. Ding, I. Krikidis, B. Sharif, and H. V . Poor, “Wireless information and power transfer in cooperative networks with spatially random relays,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4440–4453, Aug. 2014

    2014