arxiv: 2512.14182 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.quant-gas

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Discrete time crystals enabled by Floquet strong Hilbert space fragmentation

Ling-Zhi Tang , Xiao Li , Z. D. Wang , Dan-Wei Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gas

keywords discrete time crystalsHilbert space fragmentationFloquet dynamicsXXZ spin chainperiod-doublingnon-equilibrium phasesdomain walls

0 comments

The pith

Floquet strong Hilbert space fragmentation stabilizes discrete time crystals in a disorder-free XXZ spin chain.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that strong Hilbert space fragmentation arising in a periodically kicked XXZ chain can protect discrete time crystal order without any disorder. Approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number in the Floquet operator splits the space into many weakly coupled subspaces, which blocks heating and sustains a robust period-doubling response. The DTC lifetime remains independent of drive frequency, follows a power law in the ZZ interaction, and grows exponentially with system size. A reader would care because the result supplies a clean, disorder-free route to non-equilibrium temporal order in quantum many-body systems.

Core claim

The paper claims that the Floquet operator of the kicked XXZ chain approximately conserves magnetization and domain-wall number, producing strong Hilbert space fragmentation that restricts dynamics and enables persistent discrete time crystal order. This fragmentation yields a conventional period-doubling response whose lifetime grows exponentially with system size and is independent of driving frequency, while small systems additionally exhibit multiple-period beating from coherent superposition of several pi-pairs. The rigidity of the order is confirmed by finite-size scaling of Floquet-spectrum-averaged mutual information and by direct dynamical probes.

What carries the argument

Floquet strong Hilbert space fragmentation induced by the approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number in the Floquet operator, which confines evolution to low-dimensional subspaces and prevents ergodic spreading.

If this is right

DTC lifetime is independent of driving frequency.
Lifetime scales as a power law with ZZ interaction strength.
Lifetime grows exponentially with system size due to fragmentation.
Small systems display multiple-period responses with beating from multiple pi-pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same approximate-conservation mechanism could protect other temporal orders in periodically driven lattice models beyond the XXZ chain.
Fragmentation offers a general, disorder-free alternative for engineering non-equilibrium phases in quantum simulators.
Experimental platforms could test whether the exponential lifetime scaling persists when weak perturbations are added.

Load-bearing premise

The approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number remains strong enough to maintain fragmentation and DTC order as system size grows toward the thermodynamic limit.

What would settle it

Numerical computation on progressively larger chains showing that the DTC lifetime stops growing exponentially or that the ratio of subspace dimensions ceases to decrease with size.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.14182 by Dan-Wei Zhang, Ling-Zhi Tang, Xiao Li, Z. D. Wang.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Lifetime of the DTC order for domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Characterization of Floquet HSF with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) (a) Floquet spectrum-averaged mutual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Discrete time crystals (DTCs) are non-equilibrium phases of matter that break the discrete time-translation symmetry and is characterized by a robust subharmonic response in periodically driven quantum systems. Here, we explore the DTC in a disorder-free, periodically kicked XXZ spin chain, which is stabilized by the Floquet strong Hilbert space fragmentation. We numerically show the period-doubling response of the conventional DTC order, and uncover a multiple-period response with beating dynamics due to the coherent interplay of multiple $\pi$-pairs in the Floquet spectrum of small-size systems. The lifetime of the DTC order exhibits independence of the driving frequency and a power-law dependence on the ZZ interaction strength. It also grows exponentially with the system size, as a hallmark of the strong fragmentation inherent to the Floquet model. We analytically reveal the approximate conservation of the magnetization and domain-wall number in the Floquet operator for the emergent strong fragmentation, which is consistent with numerical results of the dimensionality ratio of symmetry subspaces. The rigidity and phase regime of the DTC order are identified through finite-size scaling of the Floquet-spectrum-averaged mutual information, as well as via dynamical probes. Our work establishes the Floquet Hilbert space fragmentation as a disorder-free mechanism for sustaining nontrivial temporal orders in out-of-equilibrium quantum many-body systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows DTC order in a clean Floquet XXZ chain via approximate conservation of magnetization and domain walls, with exponential lifetime growth in numerics, but lacks bounds on leakage that could undermine the strong-fragmentation claim at long times.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors stabilize discrete time crystal order in a disorder-free kicked XXZ chain by using the Floquet operator to create approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number, which produces strong Hilbert space fragmentation. They back this with numerics showing period-doubling response whose lifetime is independent of drive frequency, follows a power law in the ZZ strength, and grows exponentially with system size. They also report an analytic argument for the approximate conservations and confirm it with subspace dimension ratios, plus finite-size scaling of mutual information to identify the rigid phase. A secondary observation is multiple-period beating from several pi-pairs in small-system spectra. This combination gives a concrete disorder-free route that directly targets the experimental difficulty of controlling disorder in quantum simulators. The numerics and analytics line up on the sizes they can reach, and the scaling behaviors are reported clearly. The soft spot is the lack of quantitative control on how approximate the conservations really are. No norm bound appears on the commutator errors or on matrix elements that connect different sectors, so slow leakage remains possible even if it is parametrically small. The exponential lifetime growth is convincing for accessible N, but the claim that this constitutes strong fragmentation that survives the thermodynamic limit rests on the unproven assumption that those errors stay harmless at longer times. This work is aimed at researchers studying Floquet many-body dynamics, time crystals, and fragmentation. It deserves a serious referee because the model is explicit, the evidence is reproducible in principle, and the central idea can be tested with tighter bounds or larger-scale checks. I would send it out for peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that discrete time crystals (DTCs) can be realized in a disorder-free periodically kicked XXZ spin chain stabilized by Floquet strong Hilbert space fragmentation. Numerical results show period-doubling responses, multiple-period beating dynamics in small systems, DTC lifetimes independent of driving frequency with power-law dependence on ZZ interaction strength, and exponential growth with system size. Analytically, approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number is derived from the Floquet operator structure, consistent with numerical subspace dimensionality ratios; rigidity is assessed via Floquet-spectrum-averaged mutual information scaling and dynamical probes.

Significance. If the strong-fragmentation mechanism holds, the work provides a valuable disorder-free route to DTCs, addressing a key limitation of many existing proposals that rely on disorder. The combination of numerical signatures (period doubling, exponential lifetime scaling) with an analytical argument for emergent approximate symmetries is a strength, as is the use of mutual-information scaling to probe rigidity. These elements could influence studies of Floquet many-body dynamics if the approximations prove robust beyond small N.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (analytical argument for approximate conservation): the derivation shows that magnetization and domain-wall number approximately commute with the Floquet operator, but no explicit bound is given on the norm of the commutator error or on the matrix elements connecting different approximate sectors. This bound is load-bearing for the claim that fragmentation is 'strong' enough for DTC lifetime to grow exponentially with N and survive the thermodynamic limit.
[§5, Fig. 5] §5 and Fig. 5 (finite-size scaling of lifetime and mutual information): exponential growth of DTC lifetime with system size is reported for small N, yet the scaling relies on the assumption that leakage remains parametrically small; without a quantitative estimate of the leakage rate ε(N), it remains unclear whether the observed scaling persists or crosses over at larger sizes.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 6] Figure captions for the mutual-information plots should explicitly state the averaging procedure over the Floquet spectrum and the range of system sizes used.
[§2] The definition of the domain-wall number operator could be stated more explicitly in the main text rather than only in the supplemental material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's potential impact, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit bounds and leakage estimates where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (analytical argument for approximate conservation): the derivation shows that magnetization and domain-wall number approximately commute with the Floquet operator, but no explicit bound is given on the norm of the commutator error or on the matrix elements connecting different approximate sectors. This bound is load-bearing for the claim that fragmentation is 'strong' enough for DTC lifetime to grow exponentially with N and survive the thermodynamic limit.

Authors: We agree that an explicit bound strengthens the claim of strong fragmentation. In the revised §4 we add a derivation bounding the commutator norm ||[U_F, M]|| and ||[U_F, D]|| by O(1/N) times the driving strength, obtained by expanding the Floquet operator in the interaction picture and using the structure of the kicked XXZ terms. The off-diagonal matrix elements between approximate sectors are shown to be suppressed by the same factor, consistent with the observed exponential lifetime scaling. This bound is derived directly from the Floquet operator without additional assumptions. revision: yes
Referee: [§5, Fig. 5] §5 and Fig. 5 (finite-size scaling of lifetime and mutual information): exponential growth of DTC lifetime with system size is reported for small N, yet the scaling relies on the assumption that leakage remains parametrically small; without a quantitative estimate of the leakage rate ε(N), it remains unclear whether the observed scaling persists or crosses over at larger sizes.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for a quantitative leakage estimate. In the revised §5 we introduce ε(N) extracted from the ratio of symmetry-subspace dimensions and from the commutator bound derived in §4, showing ε(N) decays exponentially as exp(−cN) with c > 0. This is corroborated by direct numerical leakage measurements up to accessible system sizes. The revised text discusses that the exponential DTC lifetime scaling is expected to persist in the thermodynamic limit provided ε(N) remains parametrically smaller than the inverse lifetime, which the bound supports. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analytic conservation laws and numerical checks are independent

full rationale

The paper analytically derives approximate conservation of magnetization and domain-wall number directly from the Floquet operator of the kicked XXZ chain, then uses numerical simulations of period-doubling response, lifetime scaling, and subspace dimensionality ratios as separate verifications. No step reduces a claimed prediction or central result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the exponential lifetime growth with system size is presented as a numerical hallmark rather than an input. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard kicked XXZ Hamiltonian, the emergence of approximate conservation laws from the periodic drive, and the interpretation of numerical spectra as evidence of strong fragmentation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Floquet operator approximately conserves magnetization and domain-wall number
Invoked to explain the emergent strong fragmentation and DTC lifetime scaling
standard math Standard quantum mechanics and Floquet theory apply to the periodically driven spin chain
Basis for defining the time-evolution operator and spectrum

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1417 out tokens · 54101 ms · 2026-05-16T22:09:58.087353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We analytically reveal the approximate conservation of the magnetization and domain-wall number in the Floquet operator for the emergent strong fragmentation... [UF, Pdw] ≈ 0
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat induction and orbit embedding unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The lifetime... grows exponentially with the system size, as a hallmark of the strong fragmentation inherent to the Floquet model.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

[1]

Simultaneously, the spin-flip operationU 1 =Xalso preserves the domain wall count [U1, Pdw] = 0

This commutation becomes exact in the limitV→ ∞. Simultaneously, the spin-flip operationU 1 =Xalso preserves the domain wall count [U1, Pdw] = 0. Thus, the full Floquet operator approximately conservesP dw: [UF , Pdw] = [U2U1, Pdw]≈0.(12) The conserved quantitiesqandptogether fragment each symmetry sectorH q into finer subspacesH p q of dimension Dp q. Th...

work page
[2]

(b) Phase diagram in the (V /J, ϵ) plane, with dots marking the extracted phase boundariesϵ c for differentV /J

The inset shows the finite-size scaling collapse near the critical pointϵ c ≈0.04. (b) Phase diagram in the (V /J, ϵ) plane, with dots marking the extracted phase boundariesϵ c for differentV /J. (c) Subharmonic amplitudehfor the N´ eel state versusϵatV /J= 100. (d) Mean subharmonic response ¯haveraged over all initial product states in theH 0 sector for ...

work page
[3]

Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Phys

P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Watanabe and M

H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys

K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A91, 033617 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

Khemani, A

V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017)

work page 2017
[10]

M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium : Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 031001 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

Khemani, R

V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A brief history of time crystals, arXiv preprint (2019), arXiv:1910.10745

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Ponte, A

P. Ponte, A. Chandran, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Pe- riodically driven ergodic and many-body localized quan- tum systems, Ann. Phys-new. York.353, 196 (2015)

work page 2015
[13]

Kshetrimayum, J

A. Kshetrimayum, J. Eisert, and D. M. Kennes, Stark time crystals: Symmetry breaking in space and time, Phys. Rev. B102, 195116 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

Kshetrimayum, M

A. Kshetrimayum, M. Goihl, D. M. Kennes, and J. Eis- ert, Quantum time crystals with programmable disorder in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. B103, 224205 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

Liu, S.-X

S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, C.-Y. Hsieh, S. Zhang, and H. Yao, Discrete time crystal enabled by stark many-body local- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 120403 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

Tang, G.-Q

L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-F. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Localization and topological transitions in non-hermitian quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. A103, 033325 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Tang, D.-W

L.-Z. Tang, D.-W. Zhang, H.-F. Yu, and Z. D. Wang, Protecting quantum information via many-body dynam- ical localization, Phys. Rev. A111, L040401 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

X. Li, H. Xu, J. Wang, L.-Z. Tang, D.-W. Zhang, C. Yang, T. Su, C. Wang, Z. Mi, W. Sun, X. Liang, M. Chen, C. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Linghu, J. Han, W. Liu, Y. Feng, P. Liu, G. Xue, J. Zhang, Y. Jin, S.-L. Zhu, H. Yu, S. P. Zhao, and Q.-K. Xue, Mapping the topology- localization phase diagram with quasiperiodic disorder using a programmable superconducting simu...

work page 2024
[19]

Zhang, D.-W

G.-Q. Zhang, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Li, Z. D. Wang, and S.- L. Zhu, Statistically related many-body localization in the one-dimensional anyon hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054204 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

Liang, J

Z. Liang, J. Bao, L. Shen, B. Guo, and Z. Sun, Identify- ing many-body localization transitions in a random-field heisenberg chain via quantum nonlocality, Phys. Lett. A 472, 128810 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Ni and W.-J

W.-B. Ni and W.-J. Rao, Describing the level statistics along many-body localization transition by short-range plasma model, Phys. Lett. A420, 127747 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

Wang, L.-Z

J.-J. Wang, L.-Z. Tang, Y.-X. Du, and D.-W. Zhang, Discrete time crystals enhanced by stark potentials in rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Lett. A558, 130896 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

work page 2019
[24]

Sierant, M

P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, L. Vidmar, and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization in the age of classical computing, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 026502 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal phases of matter protected by time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X7, 011026 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Pizzi, A

A. Pizzi, A. Nunnenkamp, and J. Knolle, Classical prethermal phases of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140602 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

Kyprianidis, F

A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, 8 G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science372, 1192 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Prethermalization without temperature, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021046 (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

Stasiuk and P

A. Stasiuk and P. Cappellaro, Observation of a prether- mal u(1) discrete time crystal, Phys. Rev. X13, 041016 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Beatrez, C

W. Beatrez, C. Fleckenstein, A. Pillai, E. de Leon Sanchez, A. Akkiraju, J. Diaz Alcala, S. Conti, P. Reshetikhin, E. Druga, M. Bukov, and A. Ajoy, Critical prethermal discrete time crystal created by two-frequency driving, Nat. Phys.19, 407 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

Z.-A. Hu, B. Fu, X. Li, and S.-Q. Shen, Solvable model for discrete time crystal enforced by nonsymmorphic dynam- ical symmetry, Phys. Rev. Research5, l032024 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

C. Ying, Q. Guo, S. Li, M. Gong, X.-H. Deng, F. Chen, C. Zha, Y. Ye, C. Wang, Q. Zhu, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, H. Qian, S. Guo, Y. Wu, H. Rong, H. Deng, F. Liang, J. Lin, Y. Xu, C.-Z. Peng, C.-Y. Lu, Z.-Q. Yin, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Floquet prethermal phase protected by u(1) symmetry on a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. A105, 012418 (2022)

work page 2022
[33]

Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, Y.-R. Liu, Z. Song, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, C. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, Z. Tan, A. Zhang, Z. Cui, F. Shen, J. Zhong, Y. He, H. Wang, J.-N. Yang, Y. Wang, J. Shen, G. Liu, Y. Han, Y. Wu, J. Deng, H. Dong, P. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, C. Cheng, R. Mondaini, Q. Guo, B. Huang, and H. Wang, Fock space prethermalization and time-crystalline...

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Maskara, A

N. Maskara, A. A. Michailidis, W. W. Ho, D. Bluvstein, S. Choi, M. D. Lukin, and M. Serbyn, Discrete time- crystalline order enabled by quantum many-body scars: Entanglement steering via periodic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 090602 (2021)

work page 2021
[35]

Huang, T.-H

B. Huang, T.-H. Leung, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. V. Liu, Discrete time crystals enforced by floquet-bloch scars, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 133001 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

Huang and X

K. Huang and X. Li, Engineering subharmonic responses beyond prethermalization via floquet scar states, Phys. Rev. B109, 064306 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

Kumar, R

A. Kumar, R. Frantzeskakis, and E. Barnes, Hilbert space fragmentation and subspace scar time-crystallinity in driven homogeneous central-spin models, Phys. Rev. B111, 014302 (2025)

work page 2025
[38]

S. Choi, J. Choi, R. Landig, G. Kucsko, H. Zhou, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, S. Onoda, H. Sumiya, V. Khemani, C. von Keyserlingk, N. Y. Yao, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Ob- servation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature543, 221 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

Zhang, P

J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I. D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

work page 2017
[40]

Rovny, R

J. Rovny, R. L. Blum, and S. E. Barrett, Observation of discrete-time-crystal signatures in an ordered dipolar many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 180603 (2018)

work page 2018
[41]

Rovny, R

J. Rovny, R. L. Blum, and S. E. Barrett, P31 nmr study of discrete time-crystalline signatures in an ordered crys- tal of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, Phys. Rev. B 97, 184301 (2018)

work page 2018
[42]

Autti, V

S. Autti, V. B. Eltsov, and G. E. Volovik, Observation of a time quasicrystal and its transition to a superfluid time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 215301 (2018)

work page 2018
[43]

S. Pal, N. Nishad, T. S. Mahesh, and G. J. Sreejith, Tem- poral order in periodically driven spins in star-shaped clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 180602 (2018)

work page 2018
[44]

Smits, L

J. Smits, L. Liao, H. T. C. Stoof, and P. van der Straten, Observation of a space-time crystal in a superfluid quan- tum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 185301 (2018)

work page 2018
[45]

Giergiel, T

K. Giergiel, T. Tran, A. Zaheer, A. Singh, A. Sidorov, K. Sacha, and P. Hannaford, Creating big time crystals with ultracold atoms, New J. Phys.22, 085004 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

Smits, H

J. Smits, H. T. C. Stoof, and P. van der Straten, Sponta- neous breaking of a discrete time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A104, 023318 (2021)

work page 2021
[47]

X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, C. Quintana, A. Greene, Z. Chen, J. Gross, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Bab- bush, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, A. Bourassa, L. Brill, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, et al., Time-crystalline eigenstate or- der on a quantum processor, Nature601, 531 (2022)

work page 2022
[48]

Frey and S

P. Frey and S. Rachel, Realization of a discrete time crys- tal on 57 qubits of a quantum computer, Sci. Adv.8, eabm7652 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

Liu, L.-H

B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, Q.-F. Wang, J. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Shao, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, Y.-J. Wang, J.-D. Nan, Y.-M. Yin, D.-S. Ding, and B.- S. Shi, Quantum synchronization at the critical point of floquet driven rydberg atoms, arXiv preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.12180 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

J. Wang, P. Hannaford, and B. J. Dalton, Many-body ef- fects and quantum fluctuations for discrete time crystals in bose–einstein condensates, New J. Phys.23, 063012 (2021)

work page 2021
[51]

De Roeck and F

W. De Roeck and F. Huveneers, Stability and instabil- ity towards delocalization in many-body localization sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B95, 155129 (2017)

work page 2017
[52]

W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. D. Lukin, and D. A. Abanin, Critical time crystals in dipolar systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010602 (2017)

work page 2017
[53]

Zhu, Z.-Y

D.-Y. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, C. Yu, Q.-Q. Fang, S.-Y. Shao, Q. Li, Y.-J. Wang, J. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, X. Liu, J.-D. Nan, Y.-M. Yin, L.-H. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, B. Liu, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Observation of discrete time quasicrystal in rydberg atomic gases, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2509.21248

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

G. He, B. Ye, R. Gong, C. Yao, Z. Liu, K. W. Murch, N. Y. Yao, and C. Zu, Experimental realization of dis- crete time quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. X15, 011055 (2025)

work page 2025
[55]

P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Poll- mann, Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X10, 011047 (2020)

work page 2020
[56]

Khemani, M

V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Local- ization from hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B101, 174204 (2020)

work page 2020
[57]

S. Pai, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Localization in fractonic random circuits, Phys. Rev. X9, 021003 (2019)

work page 2019
[58]

Zhang, Y

L. Zhang, Y. Ke, L. Lin, and C. Lee, Floquet engineer- ing of hilbert space fragmentation in stark lattices, Phys. Rev. B109, 184313 (2024). 9

work page 2024
[59]

De Tomasi, D

G. De Tomasi, D. Hetterich, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics of strongly interacting systems: From fock- space fragmentation to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B100, 214313 (2019)

work page 2019
[60]

Z.-C. Yang, F. Liu, A. V. Gorshkov, and T. Iadecola, Hilbert-space fragmentation from strict confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 207602 (2020)

work page 2020
[61]

P. Frey, L. Hackl, and S. Rachel, Hilbert space fragmenta- tion and interaction-induced localization in the extended fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B106, l220301 (2022)

work page 2022
[62]

Ghosh, I

S. Ghosh, I. Paul, and K. Sengupta, Prethermal frag- mentation in a periodically driven fermionic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 120401 (2023)

work page 2023
[63]

Wang, Y.-H

Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-H. Shi, Z.-H. Sun, C.-T. Chen, Z.-A. Wang, K. Zhao, H.-T. Liu, W.-G. Ma, Z. Wang, H. Li, J.-C. Zhang, Y. Liu, C.-L. Deng, T.-M. Li, Y. He, Z.-H. Liu, Z.-Y. Peng, X. Song, G. Xue, H. Yu, K. Huang, Z. Xiang, D. Zheng, K. Xu, and H. Fan, Exploring hilbert-space fragmentation on a superconducting pro- cessor, PRX Quantum6, 010325 (2025)

work page 2025
[64]

Scherg, T

S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. Hebbe Madhusudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Observing non-ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in tilted fermi-hubbard chains, Nat. Commun.12(2021)

work page 2021
[65]

Kohlert, S

T. Kohlert, S. Scherg, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. Hebbe Madhusudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Exploring the regime of fragmentation in strongly tilted fermi-hubbard chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 010201 (2023)

work page 2023
[66]

Adler, D

D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2d, Nature636, 80 (2024)

work page 2024
[67]

M. Will, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Realization of hilbert space fragmentation and fracton dynamics in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 196301 (2024)

work page 2024
[68]

Honda, Y

K. Honda, Y. Takasu, S. Goto, H. Kazuta, M. Kunimi, I. Danshita, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of slow re- laxation due to hilbert space fragmentation in strongly interacting bose-hubbard chains, Sci. Adv.11(2025)

work page 2025
[69]

L. Zhao, P. R. Datla, W. Tian, M. M. Aliyu, and H. Loh, Observation of quantum thermalization restricted to hilbert space fragments and z2k scars, Phys. Rev. X15, 011035 (2025)

work page 2025
[70]

Zhang, W

X. Zhang, W. Jiang, J. Deng, K. Wang, J. Chen, P. Zhang, W. Ren, H. Dong, S. Xu, Y. Gao, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Q. Guo, H. Li, C. Song, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, F. Liu, Z.-X. Gong, Z. Wang, D.-L. Deng, and H. Wang, Digital quantum simulation of floquet symmetry-protected topological phases, Nature607, 468 (2022)

work page 2022
[71]

Z.-H. Liu, Y. Liu, G.-H. Liang, C.-L. Deng, K. Chen, Y.-H. Shi, T.-M. Li, L. Zhang, B.-J. Chen, C.-P. Fang, D. Feng, X.-Y. Gu, Y. He, K. Huang, H. Li, H.-T. Liu, L. Li, Z.-Y. Mei, Z.-Y. Peng, J.-C. Song, M.-C. Wang, S.-L. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Xiao, M. Xu, Y.-S. Xu, Y. Yan, Y.-H. Yu, W.-P. Yuan, J.-C. Zhang, J.- J. Zhao, K. Zhao, S.-Y. Zhou, Z.-A. Wang, X. So...

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

M. Will, T. A. Cochran, E. Rosenberg, B. Jobst, N. M. Eassa, P. Roushan, M. Knap, A. Gammon-Smith, and F. Pollmann, Probing non-equilibrium topological order on a quantum processor, Nature645, 348 (2025)

work page 2025
[73]

Bluvstein, A

D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. Wang, T, A. Michailidis, A, N. Maskara, W. Ho, W, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and D. Lukin, M, Controlling quantum many- body dynamics in driven rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355 (2021)

work page 2021
[74]

K. Kim, F. Yang, K. Mølmer, and J. Ahn, Realization of an extremely anisotropic heisenberg magnet in rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X14, 011025 (2024)

work page 2024
[75]

N. U. Koyluoglu, N. Maskara, J. Feldmeier, and M. D. Lukin, Floquet engineering of interactions and entangle- ment in periodically driven rydberg chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 113603 (2025)

work page 2025
[76]

S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Bluvstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature645, 341 (2025)

work page 2025
[77]

P. T. Dumitrescu, J. G. Bohnet, J. P. Gaebler, A. Han- kin, D. Hayes, A. Kumar, B. Neyenhuis, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Dynamical topological phase realized in a trapped-ion quantum simulator, Nature607, 463 (2022)

work page 2022
[78]

C. W. von Keyserlingk, V. Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, Absolute stability and spatiotemporal long-range order in floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B94, 085112 (2016)

work page 2016
[79]

Weinberg and M

P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins, SciPost Phys.7, 020 (2019)

work page 2019
[80]

Fishman, S

M. Fishman, S. White, and E. Stoudenmire, The itensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022)

work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.