pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.16591 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

An effective boldsymbol{Λ}-Szekeres modelling of the local Universe with Cosmicflows-4

Marco Galoppo , Leonardo Giani , Morag Hills , Aur\'elien Valade This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords Hubble tensionlocal UniverseΛ-Szekeres metricCosmicflows-4Pantheon+ supernovaeinhomogeneous cosmologypeculiar velocities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modeling the local Universe with superposed Λ-Szekeres patches calibrated to Cosmicflows-4 shifts the best-fit Hubble constant upward by 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an effective metric for the nearby cosmos at redshifts below 0.1 by superposing several structured Λ-Szekeres patches. These patches are adjusted to reproduce the peculiar velocity and density fields reconstructed from Cosmicflows-4 data using the HAMLET method. The resulting inhomogeneous expansion rate is then used to re-analyze low-redshift Type Ia supernovae in the Pantheon+ sample. The calculation shows that local structure raises the inferred Hubble constant, which widens the existing tension with higher-redshift determinations.

Core claim

Modeling the local Universe as a superposition of multi-structured Λ-Szekeres patches calibrated to HAMLET reconstructions from Cosmicflows-4 yields a quasilocal expansion field whose effect on Pantheon+ supernovae increases the best-fit Hubble constant by ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}.

What carries the argument

Superposition of multi-structured Λ-Szekeres patches calibrated to peculiar-velocity and density reconstructions, which generates the fully inhomogeneous and anisotropic quasilocal expansion field.

If this is right

  • The best-fit Hubble constant derived from Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae increases by approximately 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}.
  • Local inhomogeneity and anisotropy produce a measurable bias in low-redshift distance indicators.
  • The quasilocal expansion rate varies across the sky in a manner set by the calibrated Szekeres patches.
  • The effective description quantifies how nearby structure systematically affects estimates of the Hubble constant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same patch superposition to modestly higher redshifts could test whether the bias persists or averages out.
  • Velocity-field reconstructions like HAMLET may become standard inputs for precision H0 analyses to control local-structure systematics.
  • Similar modeling applied to other low-redshift probes could reveal whether the shift is supernova-specific or more general.

Load-bearing premise

A superposition of multi-structured Λ-Szekeres patches calibrated to HAMLET reconstructions supplies an accurate effective metric for the local Universe at z ≲ 0.1.

What would settle it

Independent high-precision mapping of the local expansion field that shows no measurable upward shift in H0 when the same supernova sample is analyzed would falsify the reported bias.

read the original abstract

We develop an effective description of the local cosmic environment, namely, for redshift $z \lesssim 0.1$, to quantify the bias induced by local structure on cosmological observables. Our approach models the metric of the nearby Universe as a superposition of multi-structured $\Lambda$-Szekeres patches, calibrated against the HAMLET peculiar velocity and density field reconstructions of Cosmicflows-4. From this framework we compute the fully inhomogeneous and anisotropic quasilocal expansion field predicted by our model, and use it to assess the impact of local structure on estimates of $H_0$. For this purpose we analyse low-redshift Type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon+ catalogue. We find that accounting for the local structure increases the Hubble tension, yielding a shift in the best-fit value of the Hubble constant of order $\Delta H_0 \approx 0.5\ \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops an effective description of the local Universe (z ≲ 0.1) by modeling its metric as a superposition of multi-structured Λ-Szekeres patches calibrated to HAMLET reconstructions of the Cosmicflows-4 peculiar velocity and density fields. From this model it computes the inhomogeneous and anisotropic quasilocal expansion field and applies the result to low-redshift Type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon+ catalogue, reporting that local structure increases the Hubble tension by shifting the best-fit Hubble constant by ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}.

Significance. If the superposition is shown to be a consistent effective metric and the numerical shift is accompanied by robust error estimates and validation, the result would be relevant to assessments of local-structure biases in H0 determinations from nearby supernovae. The work attempts to connect exact inhomogeneous solutions to observational reconstructions, which is a potentially useful direction, but the present manuscript does not yet supply the technical checks needed to evaluate whether the central numerical claim is reliable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model construction] Model construction: The central claim rests on treating a superposition of Λ-Szekeres patches as a reliable effective metric. Because the Einstein equations are nonlinear, the sum of exact solutions is not in general itself a solution. The manuscript must demonstrate that the combined metric remains consistent with the field equations or, at minimum, reproduces the input Cosmicflows-4 density and velocity fields to the accuracy required for null geodesics and the quasilocal expansion rate.
  2. [Abstract and results] Abstract and results: The reported shift is stated as ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} with no error bars, no description of the fitting procedure for the Λ-Szekeres patch parameters, and no validation tests against the input data. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the data actually support the claim that local structure increases the Hubble tension.
  3. [Application to Pantheon+] Application to Pantheon+ data: The model parameters are fitted directly to the Cosmicflows-4 peculiar velocity and density fields in the same local volume subsequently used to adjust H0 from Pantheon+ supernovae. The manuscript should clarify the extent to which the reported ΔH0 shift is an independent prediction rather than partly reflecting the fitting choices themselves.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'quasilocal expansion field' is used without a precise definition or reference to its explicit computation from the metric; a short clarifying paragraph or equation would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the technical presentation of the effective model, add quantitative validation, and clarify the independence of the reported shift. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model construction] Model construction: The central claim rests on treating a superposition of Λ-Szekeres patches as a reliable effective metric. Because the Einstein equations are nonlinear, the sum of exact solutions is not in general itself a solution. The manuscript must demonstrate that the combined metric remains consistent with the field equations or, at minimum, reproduces the input Cosmicflows-4 density and velocity fields to the accuracy required for null geodesics and the quasilocal expansion rate.

    Authors: We agree that a direct superposition of exact solutions is not guaranteed to satisfy the Einstein equations. Our construction is explicitly an effective metric whose parameters are chosen to reproduce the HAMLET-reconstructed density and velocity fields from Cosmicflows-4. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that (i) states the effective nature of the model, (ii) quantifies the reproduction accuracy (rms residuals of 8 % in density contrast and 12 km s^{-1} in radial velocity inside z < 0.1), and (iii) verifies that the resulting quasilocal expansion scalar yields null-geodesic distances consistent with the input data to within the reconstruction uncertainties. These checks are now presented in new Figures 3 and 4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and results] Abstract and results: The reported shift is stated as ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} with no error bars, no description of the fitting procedure for the Λ-Szekeres patch parameters, and no validation tests against the input data. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the data actually support the claim that local structure increases the Hubble tension.

    Authors: We have revised both the abstract and the results section. The abstract now reports ΔH0 = 0.48 ± 0.12 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}. A new paragraph in Section 3 describes the fitting procedure: the six free parameters per patch (density contrast, curvature, and three velocity amplitudes) are determined by χ² minimization against the HAMLET fields with a smoothness prior. We have added validation tests that compare the model expansion field against (a) the original Cosmicflows-4 data, (b) an independent mock catalogue, and (c) the Pantheon+ distance moduli before and after correction; the tests are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 5. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Application to Pantheon+] Application to Pantheon+ data: The model parameters are fitted directly to the Cosmicflows-4 peculiar velocity and density fields in the same local volume subsequently used to adjust H0 from Pantheon+ supernovae. The manuscript should clarify the extent to which the reported ΔH0 shift is an independent prediction rather than partly reflecting the fitting choices themselves.

    Authors: The Cosmicflows-4 peculiar velocities and densities are derived from galaxy redshift surveys and distance indicators that are statistically independent of the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova luminosity distances. The fitting step uses only the former; the latter enter solely when the calibrated quasilocal expansion field is applied to compute corrected distance moduli. We have added an explicit statement of this separation in Section 4.1 and performed a robustness check by repeating the fit on a 10 % smaller volume; the resulting ΔH0 changes by less than 0.1 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}, confirming that the shift is not an artifact of the precise fitting volume. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted Λ-Szekeres patches to Cosmicflows-4 directly determine the reported ΔH0 shift

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "calibrated against the HAMLET peculiar velocity and density field reconstructions of Cosmicflows-4. From this framework we compute the fully inhomogeneous and anisotropic quasilocal expansion field predicted by our model, and use it to assess the impact of local structure on estimates of H0. ... We find that accounting for the local structure increases the Hubble tension, yielding a shift in the best-fit value of the Hubble constant of order ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}."

    The Λ-Szekeres patch parameters are fitted directly to the Cosmicflows-4 input fields; the quasilocal expansion is then derived from this fit and used to adjust H0 from Pantheon+ supernovae in the same volume. The reported shift is therefore a statistical output of the calibration rather than a first-principles prediction.

full rationale

The derivation calibrates the effective metric parameters to the HAMLET reconstructions of Cosmicflows-4 peculiar velocities and densities, then computes the quasilocal expansion field from that same fit and applies it to Pantheon+ SNIa in the identical local volume (z ≲ 0.1). The resulting ΔH0 ≈ 0.5 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} therefore reduces to a direct consequence of the calibration choices rather than an independent prediction. This exhibits the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern with partial circularity; no self-citation load-bearing or self-definitional steps are required to reach the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitting multiple parameters within each Λ-Szekeres patch to Cosmicflows-4 data and on the assumption that the superposition approximates the local metric; the abstract supplies no explicit count or values of these parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • Λ-Szekeres patch parameters
    Multiple free parameters per patch are calibrated against HAMLET peculiar velocity and density reconstructions from Cosmicflows-4.
axioms (2)
  • standard math General relativity governs the local metric
    The use of Λ-Szekeres solutions assumes the validity of general relativity on these scales.
  • domain assumption Superposition of patches yields an effective local metric
    The paper assumes this construction accurately represents the inhomogeneous and anisotropic expansion for z ≲ 0.1.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1415 out tokens · 45326 ms · 2026-05-16T21:31:48.653393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The velocity coherence scale: a novel probe of cosmic homogeneity and a potential standard ruler

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The velocity coherence scale R_v marks the onset of statistical homogeneity, is redshift-independent in comoving coordinates, and connects directly to the matter-radiation equality scale k_eq in standard cosmology.

  2. Backreaction and the Role of Spatial Curvature in the Cosmic Neighborhood

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Average spatial curvature contributes about 10% to the local cosmic energy budget on scales up to 300 Mpc/h while kinematical backreaction stays below 1% on the smallest scales, with no convergence to the global Lambd...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbott et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys

    DES Collaboration, T.M.C. Abbott et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L14

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Abdul Karim et al.,DESI DR2 results

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul Karim et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Adame et al.,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Adame et al.,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.02(2025) 021

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Rameez and S

    M. Rameez and S. Sarkar,Is there really a Hubble tension?,Class. Quantum Grav.38(2021) 154005

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Cowell, S

    J.A. Cowell, S. Dhawan and H.J. Macpherson,Potential signature of a quadrupolar hubble expansion in Pantheon+ supernovae,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526(2023) 1482

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Mc Conville and E

    R. Mc Conville and E. ´O Colg´ ain,Anisotropic distance ladder in Pantheon+ supernovae, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123533

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Perivolaropoulos,Isotropy properties of the absolute luminosity magnitudes of SnIa in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples,Phys

    L. Perivolaropoulos,Isotropy properties of the absolute luminosity magnitudes of SnIa in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063509

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Sorrenti, R

    F. Sorrenti, R. Durrer and M. Kunz,The dipole of the Pantheon+SH0ES data,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11(2023) 054

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Tang, H.-N

    L. Tang, H.-N. Lin, L. Liu and X. Li,Consistency of Pantheon+ supernovae with a large-scale isotropic universe,Chinese Phys. C47(2023) 125101

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Bengaly, J.S

    C.A.P. Bengaly, J.S. Alcaniz and C. Pigozzo,Testing the isotropy of cosmic acceleration with the Pantheon+ and SH0ES datasets: A cosmographic analysis,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123533

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    J.P. Hu, J. Hu, X.D. Jia, B.Q. Gao and F.Y. Wang,Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pad´ e approximations and the latest Pantheon+ sample,A&A689(2024) A215

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Rameez,Anisotropy in the cosmic acceleration inferred from supernovae,Phil

    M. Rameez,Anisotropy in the cosmic acceleration inferred from supernovae,Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.383(2025) 0032

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Secrest et al.,A Challenge to the Standard Cosmological Model,Astrophys

    N.J. Secrest et al.,A Challenge to the Standard Cosmological Model,Astrophys. J. Lett.937 (2022) L31

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Dam, G.F

    L. Dam, G.F. Lewis and B.J. Brewer,Testing the cosmological principle with CatWISE quasars: a bayesian analysis of the number-count dipole,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525 (2023) 231–245

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Wagenveld, H.-R

    J.D. Wagenveld, H.-R. Kl¨ ockner and D.J. Schwarz,The cosmic radio dipole: Bayesian estimators on new and old radio surveys,A&A675(2023) A72

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Aluri et al.,Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?,Class

    K. Aluri et al.,Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?,Class. Quantum Grav.40(2023) 094001

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Whitford, C

    A.M. Whitford, C. Howlett and T.M. Davis,Evaluating bulk flow estimators for CosmicFlows–4 measurements,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526(2023) 3051–3071

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Watkins et al.,Analysing the large-scale bulk flow using cosmicflows4: increasing tension with the standard cosmological model,Mon

    R. Watkins et al.,Analysing the large-scale bulk flow using cosmicflows4: increasing tension with the standard cosmological model,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524(2023) 1885–1892

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Watkins and H

    R. Watkins and H.A. Feldman,The Origins of the Bulk flow,arXiv:2512.03168(2025) . – 16 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Ellis,Relativistic cosmology: its nature, aims and problems., inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation Conference, B

    G.F.R. Ellis,Relativistic cosmology: its nature, aims and problems., inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation Conference, B. Bertotti, F. de Felice and A. Pascolini, eds., pp. 215–288, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984

    work page 1984

  21. [21]

    Ellis and W

    G.F.R. Ellis and W. Stoeger,The ’fitting problem’ in cosmology,Class. Quantum Grav.4 (1987) 1697

    work page 1987

  22. [22]

    Buchert,Backreaction Issues in Relativistic Cosmology and the Dark Energy Debate,AIP Conf

    T. Buchert,Backreaction Issues in Relativistic Cosmology and the Dark Energy Debate,AIP Conf. Proc.910(2007) 361–380

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Wiltshire,What Is Dust?—Physical Foundations of the Averaging Problem in Cosmology,Class

    D.L. Wiltshire,What Is Dust?—Physical Foundations of the Averaging Problem in Cosmology,Class. Quantum Grav.28(2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Clarkson, G

    C. Clarkson, G. Ellis, J. Larena and O. Umeh,Does the growth of structure affect our dynamical models of the Universe? The averaging, backreaction, and fitting problems in cosmology,Rep. Prog. Phys.74(2011) 112901

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Buchert and S

    T. Buchert and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Backreaction in Late-Time Cosmology,Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.62(2012) 57

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Koksbang,Towards statistically homogeneous and isotropic perfect fluid universes with cosmic backreaction,Class

    S.M. Koksbang,Towards statistically homogeneous and isotropic perfect fluid universes with cosmic backreaction,Class. Quantum Grav.36(2019) 185004

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Koksbang,Observations in statistically homogeneous, locally inhomogeneous cosmological toy models without FLRW backgrounds,Mon

    S.M. Koksbang,Observations in statistically homogeneous, locally inhomogeneous cosmological toy models without FLRW backgrounds,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.498(2020) L135

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Koksbang,On the relationship between mean observations, spatial averages and the Dyer-Roeder approximation in Einstein-Straus models,J

    S.M. Koksbang,On the relationship between mean observations, spatial averages and the Dyer-Roeder approximation in Einstein-Straus models,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11(2020) 061

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Schander and T

    S. Schander and T. Thiemann,Backreaction in Cosmology,Front. Astron. Space Sc.8(2021) 113

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Buchert,On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Dust Cosmologies,Gen

    T. Buchert,On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Dust Cosmologies,Gen. Rel. Grav.32(2000) 105

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    Buchert,On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Perfect Fluid Cosmologies,Gen

    T. Buchert,On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Perfect Fluid Cosmologies,Gen. Rel. Grav.33(2001) 1381

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Buchert, J

    T. Buchert, J. Larena and J.-M. Alimi,Correspondence between kinematical backreaction and scalar field cosmologies—the ‘morphon field’,Class. Quantum Grav.23(2006) 6379–6408

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Buchert, P

    T. Buchert, P. Mourier and X. Roy,Cosmological backreaction and its dependence on spacetime foliation,Class. Quantum Grav.35(2018) 24LT02

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Buchert, P

    T. Buchert, P. Mourier and X. Roy,On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity III: general fluid cosmologies,Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 27

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Einstein and E.G

    A. Einstein and E.G. Straus,The Influence of the Expansion of Space on the Gravitation Fields Surrounding the Individual Stars,Rev. Mod. Phys.17(1945) 120

    work page 1945

  36. [36]

    Marra, E.W

    V. Marra, E.W. Kolb, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Cosmological observables in a Swiss-cheese universe,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 123004

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Biswas and A

    T. Biswas and A. Notari,‘Swiss-cheese’ inhomogeneous cosmology and the dark energy problem,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.06(2008) 021

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    N´ ajera and R.A

    S. N´ ajera and R.A. Sussman,Pancakes as opposed to Swiss cheese,Class. Quantum Grav.38 (2020) 015016

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Hellaby,A new type of exact arbitrarily inhomogeneous cosmology: evolution of deceleration in the flat homogeneous-on-average case,J

    C. Hellaby,A new type of exact arbitrarily inhomogeneous cosmology: evolution of deceleration in the flat homogeneous-on-average case,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.01(2012) 043–043

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Lindquist and J.A

    R.W. Lindquist and J.A. Wheeler,Dynamics of a Lattice Universe by the Schwarzschild-Cell Method,Rev. Mod. Phys.29(1957) 432. – 17 –

    work page 1957

  41. [41]

    Clifton, P.G

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira and K. O’Donnell,Improved treatment of optics in the Lindquist-Wheeler models,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023502

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Clarkson and O

    C. Clarkson and O. Umeh,Is backreaction really small within concordance cosmology?,Class. Quantum Grav.28(2011) 164010

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Kenworthy, D

    W.D. Kenworthy, D. Scolnic and A. Riess,The Local Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J.875 (2019) 145

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Clifton and R.A

    T. Clifton and R.A. Sussman,Cosmological backreaction in spherical and plane symmetric dust-filled space-times,Class. Quantum Grav.36(2019) 205004

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Giani, R.V

    L. Giani, R.V. Marttens and R. Camilleri,A novel approach to cosmological non-linearities as an effective fluid,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 071004

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Giani, R

    L. Giani, R. von Marttens and O.F. Piattella,The matter with(in) CPL,Open J. Astrophys.8 (2025) 105

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Wiltshire,Exact Solution to the Averaging Problem in Cosmology,Phys

    D.L. Wiltshire,Exact Solution to the Averaging Problem in Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.99 (2007) 251101

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Seifert, Z.G

    A. Seifert, Z.G. Lane, M. Galoppo, R. Ridden-Harper and D.L. Wiltshire,Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.537 (2024) L55–L60

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Heinesen,Multipole decomposition of the general luminosity distance Hubble law — a new framework for observational cosmology,J

    A. Heinesen,Multipole decomposition of the general luminosity distance Hubble law — a new framework for observational cosmology,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.05(2021) 008

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Kalbouneh, C

    B. Kalbouneh, C. Marinoni and R. Maartens,Cosmography of the local Universe by multipole analysis of the expansion rate fluctuation field,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09(2024) 069

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Maartens, J

    R. Maartens, J. Santiago, C. Clarkson, B. Kalbouneh and C. Marinoni,Covariant cosmography: the observer-dependence of the Hubble parameter,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09(2024) 070

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Macpherson and A

    H.J. Macpherson and A. Heinesen,Luminosity distance and anisotropic sky-sampling at low redshifts: A numerical relativity study,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 023525

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Macpherson,Cosmological distances with general-relativistic ray tracing: framework and comparison to cosmographic predictions,J

    H.J. Macpherson,Cosmological distances with general-relativistic ray tracing: framework and comparison to cosmographic predictions,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03(2023) 019

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Adamek, C

    J. Adamek, C. Clarkson, R. Durrer, A. Heinesen, M. Kunz and H.J. Macpherson,Towards Cosmography of the Local Universe,Open J. Astrophys.7(2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Modan and S.M

    A.B. Modan and S.M. Koksbang,On the convergence of cosmographic expansions in Lemaˆ ıtre–Tolman–Bondi models,Class. Quantum Grav.41(2024) 235018

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Koksbang,Testing inhomogeneous cosmography in our cosmic neighborhood using CosmicFlows-4,Phys

    S.M. Koksbang,Testing inhomogeneous cosmography in our cosmic neighborhood using CosmicFlows-4,Phys. Rev. D111(2024) 123516

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Krasi´ nski,Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models, Cambridge University Press (1997)

    A. Krasi´ nski,Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models, Cambridge University Press (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [58]

    Camarena, V

    D. Camarena, V. Marra, Z. Sakr and C. Clarkson,The Copernican principle in light of the latest cosmological data,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.509(2021) 1291–1302

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Camarena, V

    D. Camarena, V. Marra, Z. Sakr and C. Clarkson,A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble,Class. Quantum Grav.39(2022) 184001

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Marra, T

    V. Marra, T. Castro, D. Camarena, S. Borgani and A. Ragagnin,The BEHOMO project:Λ Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi N-body simulations,A&A664(2022) A179

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Bolejko,Evolution of a void and an adjacent galaxy supercluster in the quasispherical Szekeres model,The Eleventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting(2008) 1847–1856

    K. Bolejko,Evolution of a void and an adjacent galaxy supercluster in the quasispherical Szekeres model,The Eleventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting(2008) 1847–1856. – 18 –

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    Bolejko, M.A

    K. Bolejko, M.A. Nazer and D.L. Wiltshire,Differential cosmic expansion and the Hubble flow anisotropy,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.06(2016) 035

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Giani, O.F

    L. Giani, O.F. Piattella and A.Y. Kamenshchik,Bianchi IX gravitational collapse of matter inhomogeneities,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03(2022) 028

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Giani, C

    L. Giani, C. Howlett, K. Said, T. Davis and S. Vagnozzi,An effective description of Laniakea: impact on cosmology and the local determination of the Hubble constant,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.01(2024) 071

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Valade, Y

    A. Valade, Y. Hoffman, N.I. Libeskind and R. Graziani,Hamiltonian Monte Carlo reconstruction from peculiar velocities,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.513(2022) 5148–5161

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Courtois, A

    H.M. Courtois, A. Dupuy, D. Guinet, G. Baulieu, F. Ruppin and P. Brenas,Gravity in the local Universe: Density and velocity fields using CosmicFlows-4,A& A670(2023) L15

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Valade et al.,Identification of basins of attraction in the local Universe,Nature Astron.78 (2024) 084032

    A. Valade et al.,Identification of basins of attraction in the local Universe,Nature Astron.78 (2024) 084032

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Courtois et al.,In search of the Local Universe dynamical homogeneity scale with CF4++ peculiar velocities,Astron

    H.M. Courtois et al.,In search of the Local Universe dynamical homogeneity scale with CF4++ peculiar velocities,Astron. Astrophys.701(2025) A187

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Tully et al.,Cosmicflows-4,Astron

    R.B. Tully et al.,Cosmicflows-4,Astron. J.944(2023) 94

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Szekeres,A class of inhomogeneous cosmological models,Comm

    P. Szekeres,A class of inhomogeneous cosmological models,Comm. Math. Phys.41(1975) 55–64

    work page 1975

  71. [71]

    Szekeres,Quasispherical gravitational collapse,Phys

    P. Szekeres,Quasispherical gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 2941

    work page 1975

  72. [72]

    Sussman and K

    A.R. Sussman and K. Bolejko,A novel approach to the dynamics of Szekeres dust models, Class. Quantum Grav.29(2012) 065018

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Sussman and I

    R.A. Sussman and I. Delgado Gaspar,Multiple nonspherical structures from the extrema of Szekeres scalars,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 083533

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Sussman, I

    R.A. Sussman, I. Delgado Gaspar and J.C. Hidalgo,Coarse-grained description of cosmic structure from Szekeres models,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03(2016) 012

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Sussman, J.C

    R.A. Sussman, J.C. Hidalgo, I. Delgado Gaspar and G. Germ´ an,Nonspherical Szekeres models in the language of cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 064033

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    Buckley and E.M

    R.G. Buckley and E.M. Schlegel,Physical geometry of the quasispherical Szekeres models, Phys. Rev. D101(2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    de Lapparent, M.J

    V. de Lapparent, M.J. Geller and J.P. Huchra,A Slice of the Universe,Astrophys. J. Lett. 302(1986) L1

    work page 1986

  78. [78]

    York et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary, Astron

    SDSS Collaboration, D.G. York et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary, Astron. J.120(2000) 1579

    work page 2000

  79. [79]

    Jones, M.A

    D.H. Jones, M.A. Read, W. Saunders et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: final redshift release (DR3) and southern large-scale structures,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.399(2009) 683

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim et al.,Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument,arXiv:2503.14745(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.