pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.18381 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-20 · 🧮 math.OC · math.AP

Studies on the Rao-Nakra Sandwich Beam: Well-Posedness, Dynamics, and Controllability

George J. Bautista , Roberto de A. Capistrano-Filho , Boumediene Chentouf , Oscar Sierra Fonseca , Juan L\'imaco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC math.AP
keywords Rao-Nakra sandwich beamwell-posednessexponential stabilitynull controllabilityLyapunov functionalHilbert Uniqueness Methoddynamical boundary conditionstime-varying damping
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Rao-Nakra sandwich beam with time-varying damping and delays is exponentially stable and null controllable from the boundary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a system of three coupled partial differential equations for a sandwich beam, including longitudinal and transverse displacements with dynamical boundary conditions. It proves existence and uniqueness of solutions for the damped version using semigroup theory, establishes exponential energy decay via a Lyapunov functional that handles time-varying weights and delays, and demonstrates null controllability for the controlled system by constructing an observability inequality for the adjoint and applying the Hilbert Uniqueness Method. This matters for understanding how composite structures can be stabilized and controlled even when material properties or delays vary over time.

Core claim

For the linear Rao-Nakra sandwich beam, the Cauchy problem is well-posed, the energy decays exponentially under bounded time-varying damping and delays, and the system is null controllable by boundary control.

What carries the argument

Lyapunov functional for exponential decay and observability inequality for the adjoint system to establish null controllability via HUM.

If this is right

  • The energy of the system tends to zero exponentially fast.
  • Any initial state can be steered to the zero state in finite time by suitable boundary control.
  • The presence of time-dependent delays and variable damping weights does not destroy these properties when boundedness holds.
  • Well-posedness extends to the controlled system with dynamical boundaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The techniques may apply to other multi-layer beam models with similar couplings.
  • Explicit estimates on the decay rate could be derived for particular forms of the weights.
  • Numerical approximation of the system could test the predicted controllability times.

Load-bearing premise

The time-varying damping weights and delay functions satisfy boundedness and regularity conditions sufficient for a Lyapunov functional to yield a negative definite derivative that dominates the energy.

What would settle it

Identification of bounded time-varying functions for which some solution's energy fails to decay exponentially, or an initial condition not driven to zero by any boundary control.

read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the well-posedness, stabilization, and boundary controllability of a linear Rao-Nakra type sandwich beam. The system consists of three coupled equations that represent the longitudinal displacements of the outer layers and the transverse displacement of the composite beam, all of which are coupled with dynamical boundary conditions. In the first problem, time-varying interior damping and static boundary conditions with time-dependent delays are considered. Then, we establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the Cauchy problem associated with the damped system using semigroup theory and a classical result by Kato. Furthermore, employing a Lyapunov-based approach, we prove that the system's energy decays exponentially, despite the presence of time-varying weights and delays. In the second problem, we consider a boundary linear control system with dynamical boundary conditions, and prove its well-posedness. By deriving an observability inequality for the adjoint system and applying the Hilbert Uniqueness Method (HUM), we show that the system is null controllable. A key contribution of this work lies in handling the full three-equation coupled system, which involves significant difficulty due to the dynamic boundary conditions, resolved via appropriately constructed Lyapunov functionals and intermediate observability inequalities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the well-posedness, exponential stabilization, and boundary null controllability of a linear Rao-Nakra sandwich beam consisting of three coupled PDEs (longitudinal displacements of outer layers and transverse displacement) subject to dynamic boundary conditions. For the first problem, existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Cauchy problem with time-varying interior damping and time-dependent delayed boundary conditions are obtained via semigroup theory and Kato's theorem; exponential energy decay is then proved by constructing a suitable Lyapunov functional. For the second problem, well-posedness of the boundary-controlled system is established, an observability inequality is derived for the adjoint system, and null controllability is concluded by the Hilbert Uniqueness Method.

Significance. If the estimates hold, the work extends existing results on sandwich-beam control to the fully coupled three-equation setting with both time-varying coefficients and dynamic boundaries. The explicit construction of Lyapunov functionals and intermediate observability inequalities for this model supplies a concrete template that may be useful for other coupled structural systems with variable damping or delays.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Preliminaries / Assumptions] The precise regularity and boundedness hypotheses imposed on the time-varying weights and delay functions should be collected in a single preliminary section or assumption list so that the reader can immediately verify they are compatible with the Lyapunov derivative estimate and with Kato's theorem.
  2. [Controllability analysis] In the controllability section, the statement of the observability inequality should explicitly indicate the observation operator (e.g., which boundary traces or interior terms are measured) and the length of the observation time interval.
  3. [Introduction] A brief comparison paragraph with earlier results on two-layer or static-boundary Rao-Nakra models would help situate the technical novelty of the three-equation dynamic-boundary case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive evaluation of our manuscript. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and the recognition that the work extends results on sandwich-beam control to the fully coupled three-equation setting with time-varying coefficients and dynamic boundaries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard functional-analytic methods applied directly

full rationale

The derivation chain applies Kato's theorem to establish well-posedness of the time-dependent generator, constructs a Lyapunov functional whose derivative yields a negative definite term for exponential decay under the stated boundedness assumptions on weights and delays, and derives an observability inequality for the adjoint system before invoking the Hilbert Uniqueness Method for null controllability. These steps rely on classical results in semigroup theory and infinite-dimensional control (explicitly referenced as such in the abstract) without any reduction of the target quantities to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The technical difficulties of the three-equation coupling and dynamic boundaries are resolved by explicitly constructed functionals and inequalities, keeping the argument self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard functional-analysis tools rather than new postulates or fitted constants.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The spatial operator generates a C0-semigroup on the appropriate Hilbert space
    Invoked via Kato's theorem for well-posedness of the damped system
  • domain assumption A Lyapunov functional exists whose time derivative is negative definite under the stated boundedness conditions on weights and delays
    Central to the exponential-decay proof

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1333 out tokens · 26216 ms · 2026-05-16T20:48:06.600798+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akil and Z

    M. Akil and Z. Liu, Stabilization of the generalized Rao-Nakra beam by partial viscous damping,Math Meth Appl Sci., 46 (2023), 1479–1510. 4

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    M. M. Al-Gharabli, S. Al-Omari, A. M. Al-mahdi, Stabilization of a Rao–Nakra sandwich beam system by Coleman–Gurtin’s thermal law and nonlinear damping of variable-exponent type,Journal of Mathematics, 2024, Article ID 1615178, 21 pages. 4

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Z. M. Ali, A. Wehbe and A. Guesmia, Energy decay rate of the generalized Rao-Nakra beam with singular local Kelvin-Voigt damping,Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 13 (2024), 1548–1583. 4

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    A. M. Al-Mahdi, M. Noor, M. M. Al-Gharabli, B. Feng, and A. Soufyane, Stability analysis for a Rao- Nakra sandwich beam equation with time-varying weights and frictional dampings,AIMS Math., 9 (2023), 12570–12587. 4

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    R. G. C. Almeida, Sebasti˜ ao, M. S. Cordeiro, W. R. Oliveira, M. L. Santos, C. A. Raposo, Asymptotic behavior of the Rao-Nakra beam model with localized damping,Contrib. Math., 11 (2025), 55–64. 4 RAO-NAKRA SANDWICH BEAM MODEL 31

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Ammari, V

    K. Ammari, V. Komornik, M. Sep´ ulveda-Cort´ es, O. Vera-Villagr´ an, Stability of the Rao-Nakra Sandwich Beam With a Dissipation of Fractional Derivative Type: Theoretical and Numerical Study,Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 48 (2025), 6678–6690. 4

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Aouadi, Regularity and upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for non-autonomous Rao-Nakra beam,Nonlinearity, 35(2022), 1773–1809

    M. Aouadi, Regularity and upper semicontinuity of pullback attractors for non-autonomous Rao-Nakra beam,Nonlinearity, 35(2022), 1773–1809. 4

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    G. J. Bautista and A. F. Pazoto, On the controllability of a Boussinesq system for two-way propagation of dispersive waves,J. Evol. Eqs., 20 (2020), 607–630. 25

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    G. J. Bautista, R. A. Capistrano-Filho, B. Chentouf, and O. Sierra Fonseca, Well-posedness and long- time dynamics of a water-waves model with time-varying boundary delay,Asymptotic Analysis, (2025), doi:10.1177/09217134251344395. 11

    work page doi:10.1177/09217134251344395 2025

  10. [10]

    V. R. Cabanillas, T. Quispe and J. S´ anchez, Optimal polynomial stability for laminated beams with Kelvin–Voigt damping,Math. Meth. Appl. Sciences, 45(16) (2022), 9578–9601. 20

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    V. R. Cabanillas, C. A. Raposo and L. Potenciano-Machado, Stability of solution for Rao–Nakra sandwich beam model with Kelvin-Voigt damping and time delay,Theor. Appl. Mech., 49 (2022) 71–84. 4

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    R. A. Capistrano–Filho, F. A. Gallego, and A. F. Pazoto, On the well-posedness and large-time behavior of higher order Boussinesq system,Nonlinearity, 5 (2019), 1852–1881. 25

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    R. A. Capistrano–Filho, B. Chentouf, V. H. Gonzalez Martinez, and J. R. Mu˜ noz, On the boundary stabi- lization of the KdV-KdV system with time-dependent delay,Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 79 (2024), 104122. 11, 15

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    M. M. Cavalcanti, B. Feng, V. H. G. Martinez and S. Mansouri, Asymptotic behavior of Rao–Nakra sandwich beam with nonlinear localized damping and source terms,Appl. Math. Optim., 91 (2025) 18. 4

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Di Neza, G

    L. Di Neza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces,Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 136 (2012), 521–573. 27

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    L.,A general theory of observation and control,SIAM J

    Dolecki, S., Russell, D. L.,A general theory of observation and control,SIAM J. Control Optim.,15 (1977), 185–220. 7

    work page 1977

  17. [17]

    B. Feng, A. ¨O. ¨Ozkan, Long-time behavior of a nonlinearly-damped three-layer Rao–Nakra sandwich beam,Appl. Math. Optim.87 (2023), art. 19. 4

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    B. Feng, C. A. Raposo, C. A. Nonato and A. Soufyane, Analysis of exponential stabilization for Rao-Nakra sandwich beam with time-varying weight and time-varying delay: multiplier method versus observabil- ity,Math. Control Relat. Fields13 (2023) 631–663. 4

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    M. M. Freitas, M. L. Santos, C. A. Raposo, A. A. Ramos, and J. Ferreira, Blow-up solutions for damped Rao-Nakra beams with source termsElectron. J. Differential Equations, 39 (2025), 1–14. 5

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Guesmia, On the stability of a linear Cauchy Rao-Nakra sandwich beam under frictional dampings, Taiwanese J

    A. Guesmia, On the stability of a linear Cauchy Rao-Nakra sandwich beam under frictional dampings, Taiwanese J. Math.27 (2023), 799–811. 4

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Guesmia, Study of the well-posedness and decay rates for Rao–Nakra sandwich beam models subject to a single internal infinite memory and Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions,Comp

    A. Guesmia, Study of the well-posedness and decay rates for Rao–Nakra sandwich beam models subject to a single internal infinite memory and Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions,Comp. Appl. Math., 44 (2025), 44-67. 4

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    S. W. Hansen, R. Rajaram, Riesz basis property and related results for a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.Supplement Vol. (2005) 365–375. 3

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Holmgren, ¨Uber Systeme von linearen partiellen Differentialgleichungen,¨Ofversigt af Kongl

    E. Holmgren, ¨Uber Systeme von linearen partiellen Differentialgleichungen,¨Ofversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps- Academien F¨ orhandlinger, 58 (1901), 91–103. 29

    work page 1901

  24. [24]

    hyperbolic

    T. Kato, Linear evolution equations of “hyperbolic” type,J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I, 17 (1970), 241–258. 5, 7

    work page 1970

  25. [25]

    J. L. Lions and E. Magenes,Probl` emes aux limites non homog` enes et applications,vol. 1, Ed. Dunod, Paris, (1968). 27

    work page 1968

  26. [26]

    L.,Contrˆ olabilit´ e exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de syst` emes distribu´ es: Contrˆ olabilit´ e exacte,Masson, (1988)

    Lions, J. L.,Contrˆ olabilit´ e exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de syst` emes distribu´ es: Contrˆ olabilit´ e exacte,Masson, (1988). 7

    work page 1988

  27. [27]

    L.,Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems,SIAM Review, 30(1) (1988), 1–68

    Lions, J. L.,Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems,SIAM Review, 30(1) (1988), 1–68. 7

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    Z. Liu, B. Rao, and Q. Zhang, Polynomial stability of the Rao-Nakra beam with a single internal viscous damping,J. Diff. Eqs., 269 (2020), 6125–6162. 4

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Micu, On the controllability of the linearized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation,SIAM J

    S. Micu, On the controllability of the linearized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation,SIAM J. Control Optim., 39 (2001), 1677–1696. 25

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    S. E. Mukiawa, Well-posedness and stabilization of a type three layer beam system with Gurtin–Pipkin’s thermal law,AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 28188–28209. 4

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    S. E. Mukiawa, C. D. Enyi, and J. D. Audu, Well-posedness and stability result for a thermoelastic Rao-Nakra beam model,Journal of Thermal Stresses, 45 (2022), 720–739. 4

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Nicaise and C

    S. Nicaise and C. Pignotti, Stability and instability results of the wave equation with a delay term in the boundary or internal feedbacks,SIAM J. Control Optim., 5 (2006), 1561–1585. 7

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Nicaise, J

    S. Nicaise, J. Valein and E. Fridman, Stability of the heat and of the wave equations with boundary time-varying delays,Discrete Continuous Dynamical Systems-S., 3 (2009), 559–581. 7, 9 32 BAUTISTA, CAPISTRANO–FILHO, CHENTOUF, SIERRA, AND LIMACO

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    A. ¨O. ¨Ozkan and S. W. Hansen, Uniform stabilization of a multilayer Rao-Nakra sandwich beam,Evol. Equ. Control Theory2 (2013) 695–710. 3

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    A. ¨O. ¨Ozkan and S. W. Hansen, Exact boundary controllability results for a multilayer Rao-Nakra sand- wich beam,SIAM J. Control Optim., 52 (2014) 1314–1337. 3

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    A. ¨O. ¨Ozkan, Modeling and controlling an active constrained layer (ACL) beam actuated by two voltage sources with/without magnetic effects,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62 (2017), 6445–6450. 3

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    A. ¨O. ¨Ozkan, Dynamic and electrostatic modeling for a piezoelectric smart composite and related stabi- lization results,Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 7 (2018) 7, 639–668. 4

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Pazy,Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations,Springer, New York, (1983)

    A. Pazy,Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations,Springer, New York, (1983). 12, 21

    work page 1983

  39. [39]

    C. G. Quica˜ no Barrientos, J. C. Sanchez Vargas, L. G. Huamanlazo Ricci, J. R. T´ amara Albino, Expo- nential Stability of Rao-Nakra sandwich Beams,Pesquimat, 25 (2022), 44–57. 4

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Quispe M´ endez, V

    T. Quispe M´ endez, V. Cabanillas Zannini and B. Feng, Asymptotic behavior of the Rao-Nakra sandwich beam model with Kelvin-Voigt damping,Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 29 (2023), 22–38. 4

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Rajaram, Exact boundary controllability result for a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam,Syst

    R. Rajaram, Exact boundary controllability result for a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam,Syst. Control Lett., 56 (2007), 558–567. 3

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    C. R. Raposo, Rao–Nakra model with internal damping and time delay,Math. Morav., 25 (2021), 53–67. 4

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Y. V. K. S. Rao and B. C. Nakra, Vibrations of sandwich beams with viscoelastic core,Journal of Sound and Vibration, 34 (1974), 309–326. 1

    work page 1974

  44. [44]

    Y. V. K. S. Rao and B. C. Nakra, Free and forced vibrations of viscoelastic sandwich beams with all layers of different thickness,Journal of Sound and Vibration, 48 (1976). 1

    work page 1976

  45. [45]

    C. A. Raposo, O. P. Vera Villagran, J. Ferreira, E. Pi¸ skin, Rao-Nakra sandwich beam with second sound, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, 4 (2021) 100053. 4

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Simon, Compact sets in the spaceL p(0, T;B),Annali di Matematica Pura ed Appicata, CXLVIIV (1987), 65–96

    J. Simon, Compact sets in the spaceL p(0, T;B),Annali di Matematica Pura ed Appicata, CXLVIIV (1987), 65–96. 28

    work page 1987

  47. [47]

    O. P. V. Villagr´ an, C. A. Raposo, C. A. Nonato, A. J. A. Ramos, Stability of solution for Rao-Nakra sandwich beam with boundary dissipation of fractional derivative type,J. Fract. Calc. Appl., 13 (2022), 116–143. 4

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Wang, Boundary feedback stabilization of a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam,Phys.: Conf

    Y. Wang, Boundary feedback stabilization of a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam,Phys.: Conf. Ser.1324 012044 (2019), 9 pages. 4

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    G. Q. Xu, S.P. Yung and L. K. Li, Stabilization of wave systems with input delay in the boundary control, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 12 (2006), 770–785. 7

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    Zuazua, Exponential decay for the semilinear wave equation with locally distributed damping,Comm

    E. Zuazua, Exponential decay for the semilinear wave equation with locally distributed damping,Comm. Partial Diff. Eqs., 15 (2) (1990), 205–235. 28 Instituto de Matem ´atica e Estat ´ıstica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Campus Gragoat ´a, 24210-201, Niter´oi (RJ), Brazil. Email address:geojbs25@gmail.com Email address:jlimaco@id.uff.br Departamento de...

    work page 1990