pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.01191 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-03 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-lat

Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions

Nathan Seiberg , Wucheng Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat
keywords staggered fermionst Hooft anomaliesKlein bottlesheared torusparity anomalytime-reversal symmetry2+1 dimensionslattice Hamiltonian
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice staggered fermions in 2+1d exhibit parity and time-reversal anomalies that match the continuum when placed on tori and Klein bottles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines symmetries of staggered fermions on a 2+1d lattice and shows how to place the system on sheared tori or Klein bottles. These backgrounds diagnose 't Hooft anomalies tied to crystalline symmetries. The authors map lattice symmetries to continuum symmetries in a nontrivial way and use the map to show that the anomalies agree exactly between the discrete and continuous descriptions. This matching confirms that the lattice model reproduces the correct anomalous physics of the field theory. The work also supplies a general way to study Hamiltonian lattice models on compact flat spaces.

Core claim

Staggered fermion lattice models in 2+1d can be defined on any sheared torus or Klein bottle using their crystalline symmetries; a nontrivial map sends these lattice symmetries to the symmetries of the corresponding continuum theories, and the map equates the 't Hooft anomalies of the two descriptions, including the modulo-8 parity and time-reversal anomalies.

What carries the argument

The nontrivial symmetry map between the lattice staggered-fermion model and the continuum Dirac theory, which preserves anomaly data on compact flat backgrounds.

If this is right

  • The lattice model reproduces the full set of 't Hooft anomalies of the continuum theory.
  • Staggered fermions admit consistent definitions on every compact flat manifold.
  • The anomaly coefficients are constrained to multiples of 8 for parity and time-reversal.
  • The same symmetry-mapping technique applies to other lattice fermion models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method offers a practical diagnostic for anomaly cancellation in numerical lattice simulations.
  • Analogous placements on higher-genus surfaces could probe additional anomaly structures.
  • The framework may connect lattice results to classifications of topological phases in condensed-matter systems.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetries of the lattice system can be identified with those of the continuum theory in a way that carries the anomaly information unchanged.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the anomaly phase on a Klein bottle that differs by a nonzero multiple of 8 between the lattice Hamiltonian and the continuum effective theory would falsify the matching.

read the original abstract

We study the symmetries of lattice staggered fermions in 2+1d. Using the symmetries, we can place the system on any sheared torus or Klein bottle. These different backgrounds provide diagnostics of various 't Hooft anomalies associated with the crystalline symmetries. We then compare the lattice model to its continuum limit. The symmetries of the lattice system are mapped in a nontrivial way to the symmetries of the continuum theories. Using this map, we match the 't Hooft anomalies on the lattice and the continuum. Along the way, we develop a general formalism to study Hamiltonian lattice models on nontrivial, compact, flat spaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies symmetries of 2+1d lattice staggered fermions, develops a formalism to place Hamiltonian models on sheared tori and Klein bottles, maps lattice symmetries nontrivially to continuum symmetries, and uses this to match 't Hooft anomalies (particularly modulo-8 parity/time-reversal anomalies) between lattice and continuum descriptions.

Significance. If the symmetry map is rigorously constructed and the anomaly matching holds, the work supplies concrete diagnostics for crystalline anomalies on nontrivial flat backgrounds and clarifies how staggered-fermion discretizations reproduce continuum anomaly coefficients, which is useful for lattice studies of 2+1d topological phases.

major comments (1)
  1. [Symmetry mapping and anomaly matching sections] The central claim requires an explicit, verifiable map between lattice symmetry generators (translations, rotations, reflections on the sheared torus/Klein bottle) and continuum ones such that anomaly coefficients match exactly. The manuscript asserts this map is nontrivial yet supplies neither the operator dictionary nor a direct lattice anomaly computation (e.g., via projective representations or cobordism invariants on the Klein-bottle background) that is then shown to equal the continuum value; without this, the matching cannot be confirmed and could be falsified by an extra sign or factor of 2/8.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Formalism section] Notation for the sheared torus and Klein-bottle backgrounds would be clearer with an explicit figure or coordinate definition early in the formalism section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve the explicitness of the symmetry map and anomaly computation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Symmetry mapping and anomaly matching sections] The central claim requires an explicit, verifiable map between lattice symmetry generators (translations, rotations, reflections on the sheared torus/Klein bottle) and continuum ones such that anomaly coefficients match exactly. The manuscript asserts this map is nontrivial yet supplies neither the operator dictionary nor a direct lattice anomaly computation (e.g., via projective representations or cobordism invariants on the Klein-bottle background) that is then shown to equal the continuum value; without this, the matching cannot be confirmed and could be falsified by an extra sign or factor of 2/8.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. While the manuscript defines the lattice symmetry generators on sheared tori and Klein bottles in Section 3 and states the nontrivial map to continuum symmetries in Section 4, we agree that an explicit operator dictionary and a self-contained lattice anomaly calculation would make the matching more verifiable. In the revision we will add a table that lists each lattice generator (translations, rotations, reflections) together with its continuum counterpart, including the precise phase factors induced by the staggering. We will also include an appendix that computes the lattice anomaly directly via the projective representation of the symmetry group on the Klein-bottle background and shows that the resulting modulo-8 invariant equals the continuum cobordism value. These additions will eliminate any ambiguity about extra signs or factors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: anomaly matching via explicit symmetry map is independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper derives a symmetry map between lattice staggered fermions on sheared tori/Klein bottles and continuum theories, then uses it to compare 't Hooft anomalies. No quoted step defines the map in terms of the anomalies, fits parameters to anomaly coefficients, or renames a known result as a prediction. The matching is presented as a consistency check between two independently formulated descriptions, with the lattice symmetries providing diagnostics that are then compared rather than assumed equal by construction. This is the normal non-circular case for anomaly-matching arguments.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; paper appears to rest on standard lattice QFT and anomaly-matching assumptions without new free parameters or invented entities visible here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of lattice gauge theory and 't Hooft anomaly matching
    Invoked to equate lattice and continuum anomalies via symmetry map.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5412 in / 1000 out tokens · 31502 ms · 2026-05-16T17:53:01.936273+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lattice fermion formulation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Overlap fermions

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Physics-informed neural networks construct overlap fermions by optimizing to the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and autonomously discover both the standard and generalized Fujikawa-type versions of the relation.

  2. Lattice fermion formulation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Overlap fermions

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Physics-Informed Neural Networks construct lattice Dirac operators satisfying the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, reproducing overlap fermions to high accuracy and discovering a Fujikawa-type generalized relation via algebr...

  3. Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A bosonic lattice model realizes exact chiral symmetry and its anomaly in 3+1d, with the continuum limit a compact boson theory with axion-like coupling.

  4. Taste-splitting mass and edge modes in $3+1$ D staggered fermions

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A kink in a one-link mass term for 3+1D staggered fermions creates a 2+1D domain wall with two-flavor massless Dirac fermions protected by SU(2) and parity, realizing the parity anomaly from the UV lattice Hamiltonian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci. Ser. B59(1980) 135–157

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis,Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,Annals Phys.16(1961) 407–466

    work page 1961

  3. [3]

    Affleck and E

    I. Affleck and E. H. Lieb,A Proof of Part of Haldane’s Conjecture on Spin Chains, Lett. Math. Phys.12(1986) 57

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Affleck,Quantum Spin Chains and the Haldane Gap,J

    I. Affleck,Quantum Spin Chains and the Haldane Gap,J. Phys. C1(1989) 3047

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Topological approach to Luttinger's theorem and the Fermi surface of a Kondo lattice

    M. Oshikawa,Topological approach to Luttinger’s theorem and the Fermi surface of a Kondo lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000), no. 15 3370, [cond-mat/0002392]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    M. B. Hastings,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions,Phys. Rev. B69(2004) 104431, [cond-mat/0305505]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Translational symmetry and microscopic constraints on symmetry-enriched topological phases: a view from the surface

    M. Cheng, M. Zaletel, M. Barkeshli, A. Vishwanath, and P. Bonderson, Translational Symmetry and Microscopic Constraints on Symmetry-Enriched Topological Phases: A View from the Surface,Phys. Rev. X6(2016), no. 4 041068, [arXiv:1511.02263]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    C.-M. Jian, Z. Bi, and C. Xu,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and its generalizations from the Perspective of the Symmetry Protected Topological phase,Phys. Rev. B97 (2018), no. 5 054412, [arXiv:1705.00012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    G. Y. Cho, C.-T. Hsieh, and S. Ryu,Anomaly Manifestation of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem and Topological Phases,Phys. Rev. B96(2017), no. 19 195105, [arXiv:1705.03892]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    M. A. Metlitski and R. Thorngren,Intrinsic and emergent anomalies at deconfined critical points,Phys. Rev. B98(2018), no. 8 085140, [arXiv:1707.07686]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    D. V. Else and R. Thorngren,Topological theory of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorems in quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. B101(2020), no. 22 224437, [arXiv:1907.08204]. 44

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Gioia and C

    L. Gioia and C. Wang,Nonzero Momentum Requires Long-Range Entanglement, Phys. Rev. X12(2022), no. 3 031007, [arXiv:2112.06946]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 2 051, [arXiv:2211.12543]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Gauging spatial symmetries and the classification of topological crystalline phases

    R. Thorngren and D. V. Else,Gauging Spatial Symmetries and the Classification of Topological Crystalline Phases,Phys. Rev. X8(2018), no. 1 011040, [arXiv:1612.00846]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff,Axial Anomaly Induced Fermion Fractionization and Effective Gauge Theory Actions in Odd Dimensional Space-Times,Phys. Rev. Lett.51(1983) 2077

    work page 1983

  16. [16]

    A. N. Redlich,Gauge Noninvariance and Parity Violation of Three-Dimensional Fermions,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 18

    work page 1984

  17. [17]

    A. N. Redlich,Parity Violation and Gauge Noninvariance of the Effective Gauge Field Action in Three-Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 2366–2374

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    Alvarez-Gaume, S

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, S. Della Pietra, and G. W. Moore,Anomalies and Odd Dimensions,Annals Phys.163(1985) 288

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Rao and R

    S. Rao and R. Yahalom,Parity Anomalies in Gauge Theories in (2+1)-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B172(1986) 227–230

    work page 1986

  20. [20]

    Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms

    A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo, and Z. Wang,Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms,JHEP12(2015) 052, [arXiv:1406.7329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    G. Y. Cho, C.-T. Hsieh, T. Morimoto, and S. Ryu,Topological Phases Protected By Reflection Symmetry and Cross-cap States,Phys. Rev. B91(2015) 195142, [arXiv:1501.07285]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Global anomalies on the surface of fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases in (3+1) dimensions

    C.-T. Hsieh, G. Y. Cho, and S. Ryu,Global anomalies on the surface of fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases in (3+1) dimensions,Phys. Rev. B93 (2016), no. 7 075135, [arXiv:1503.01411]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases

    E. Witten,Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases,Rev. Mod. Phys.88 (2016), no. 3 035001, [arXiv:1508.04715]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    The "Parity" Anomaly On An Unorientable Manifold

    E. Witten,The ”Parity” Anomaly On An Unorientable Manifold,Phys. Rev. B94 (2016), no. 19 195150, [arXiv:1605.02391]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Anomaly indicators for time-reversal symmetric topological orders

    C. Wang and M. Levin,Anomaly indicators for time-reversal symmetric topological orders,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 13 136801, [arXiv:1610.04624]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Tachikawa and K

    Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,On time-reversal anomaly of 2+1d topological phases,PTEP2017(2017), no. 3 033B04, [arXiv:1610.07010]. 45

    work page arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    More on time-reversal anomaly of 2+1d topological phases

    Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,More on time-reversal anomaly of 2+1d topological phases,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 11 111603, [arXiv:1611.01601]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Barkeshli, P

    M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, C.-M. Jian, M. Cheng, and K. Walker,Reflection and time reversal symmetry enriched topological phases of matter: path integrals, non-orientable manifolds, and anomalies,Commun. Math. Phys.374(2019), no. 2 1021–1124, [arXiv:1612.07792]

    work page arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    S. Tata, R. Kobayashi, D. Bulmash, and M. Barkeshli,Anomalies in (2+1)D Fermionic Topological Phases and (3+1)D Path Integral State Sums for Fermionic SPTs,Commun. Math. Phys.397(2023), no. 1 199–336, [arXiv:2104.14567]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Classification of Gapped Symmetric Phases in 1D Spin Systems

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen,Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,Phys. Rev. B83(2011), no. 3 035107, [arXiv:1008.3745]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Filling constraints for spin-orbit coupled insulators in symmorphic and non-symmorphic crystals

    H. Watanabe, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and M. Zaletel,Filling constraints for spin-orbit coupled insulators in symmorphic and nonsymmorphic crystals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(2015), no. 47 14551–14556, [arXiv:1505.04193]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Ogata, Y

    Y. Ogata, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Tasaki,General Lieb–Schultz–Mattis Type Theorems for Quantum Spin Chains,Commun. Math. Phys.385(2021), no. 1 79–99, [arXiv:2004.06458]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024), no. 3 064, [arXiv:2307.02534]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Y. Yao, L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and C.-T. Hsieh,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem for 1D Quantum Magnets with Antiunitary Translation and Inversion Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 13 136705, [arXiv:2307.09843]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Seiberg, S

    N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 154, [arXiv:2401.12281]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    S. D. Pace, A. Chatterjee, and S.-H. Shao,Lattice T-duality from non-invertible symmetries in quantum spin chains,SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 4 121, [arXiv:2412.18606]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    S. D. Pace, M. L. Kim, A. Chatterjee, and S.-H. Shao,Parity Anomaly from a Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem: Exact Valley Symmetries on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 23 236501, [arXiv:2505.04684]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    M. L. Kim, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao,Symmetry-enforced Fermi surfaces, arXiv:2512.04150. 46

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    LSM and CPT,

    N. Seiberg, S.-H. Shao, and W. Zhang,LSM and CPT,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(Nov., 2025) 116, [arXiv:2508.17115]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind,Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 395–408

    work page 1975

  41. [41]

    Banks, L

    T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. B. Kogut,Strong Coupling Calculations of Lattice Gauge Theories: (1+1)-Dimensional Exercises,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 1043

    work page 1976

  42. [42]

    Banks, S

    T. Banks, S. Raby, L. Susskind, J. B. Kogut, D. R. T. Jones, P. N. Scharbach, and D. K. Sinclair,Strong Coupling Calculations of the Hadron Spectrum of Quantum Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 1111

    work page 1977

  43. [43]

    Susskind,Lattice Fermions,Phys

    L. Susskind,Lattice Fermions,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 3031–3039

    work page 1977

  44. [44]

    Majorana-Hubbard model on the square lattice

    I. Affleck, A. Rahmani, and D. Pikulin,The Majorana-Hubbard model on the square lattice,Phys. Rev. B96(2017), no. 12 125121, [arXiv:1706.05469]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.B 97, 039901 (2018)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Catterall,’t Hooft anomalies for staggered fermions,Phys

    S. Catterall,’t Hooft anomalies for staggered fermions,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 1 014501, [arXiv:2209.03828]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Catterall and A

    S. Catterall and A. Pradhan,Gauging staggered fermion shift symmetries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 9 094516, [arXiv:2405.03037]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions,

    S. Catterall and A. Pradhan,Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions,arXiv:2501.10862

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Quan- tized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao,Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:2409.12220]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    van den Doel and J

    C. van den Doel and J. Smit,Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Two Flavor SU(N) and SO(N) Lattice Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B228(1983) 122–144

    work page 1983

  50. [50]

    Kluberg-Stern, A

    H. Kluberg-Stern, A. Morel, O. Napoly, and B. Petersson,Flavors of Lagrangian Susskind Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B220(1983) 447–470

    work page 1983

  51. [51]

    Parisi and Y

    G. Parisi and Y. C. Zhang,Staggered Fermions And Rotation Gauge Invariance, Nucl. Phys. B230(1984) 97–108

    work page 1984

  52. [52]

    M. F. L. Golterman and J. Smit,Lattice Baryons With Staggered Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 328–340

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    M. F. L. Golterman,STAGGERED MESONS,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 663–676

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    M. F. L. Golterman,Irreducible Representations of the Staggered Fermion Symmetry Group,Nucl. Phys. B278(1986) 417–435

    work page 1986

  55. [55]

    G. W. Kilcup and S. R. Sharpe,A Tool Kit for Staggered Fermions,Nucl. Phys. B 283(1987) 493–550. 47

    work page 1987

  56. [56]

    Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions

    C. Wang and T. Senthil,Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions,Phys. Rev. B89(2014), no. 19 195124, [arXiv:1401.1142]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.B 91, 239902 (2015)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    M. A. Metlitski, L. Fidkowski, X. Chen, and A. Vishwanath,Interaction effects on 3D topological superconductors: surface topological order from vortex condensation, the 16 fold way and fermionic Kramers doublets,arXiv:1406.3032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Delmastro, D

    D. Delmastro, D. Gaiotto, and J. Gomis,Global anomalies on the Hilbert space, JHEP11(2021) 142, [arXiv:2101.02218]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    H. B. Lawson and M.-L. Michelsohn,Spin geometry, vol. 38. Princeton university press, 2016

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    R. C. Kirby and L. R. Taylor,Pin structures on low-dimensional manifolds, Geometry of low-dimensional manifolds2(1990) 177–242

    work page 1990

  61. [61]

    Hatcher,Algebraic Topology

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic Topology. Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    Kaidi, J

    J. Kaidi, J. Parra-Martinez, Y. Tachikawa, and A. Debray,Topological Superconductors on Superstring Worldsheets,SciPost Phys.9(2020) 10, [arXiv:1911.11780]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    J. G. Ratcliffe,Foundations of Hyperbolic Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 3 ed., 2019

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten,JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24(2020), no. 6 1475–1680, [arXiv:1907.03363]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Witten, Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes, arXiv:2305.01012

    E. Witten,Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes,arXiv:2305.01012

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    D. S. Freed, M. J. Hopkins, and C. Teleman,The Odd Fermion,arXiv:2401.04223

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Harlow, S.-H

    D. Harlow, S.-H. Shao, J. Sorce, and M. Srivastava,Disjoint additivity and local quantum physics,arXiv:2509.03589

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev,The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 134509, [arXiv:0904.2197]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    P. Sala, J. Lehmann, T. Rakovszky, and F. Pollmann,Dynamics in Systems with Modulated Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 17 170601, [arXiv:2110.08302]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    J. H. Han, E. Lake, H. T. Lam, R. Verresen, and Y. You,Topological quantum chains protected by dipolar and other modulated symmetries,Phys. Rev. B109 (2024), no. 12 125121, [arXiv:2309.10036]. 48

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    S. D. Pace, G. Delfino, H. T. Lam, and ¨O. M. Aksoy,Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections,SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 1 021, [arXiv:2406.12962]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit,Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly,Nucl. Phys. B183(1981) 103

    work page 1981

  73. [73]

    P. B. Gilkey,The geometry of spherical space form groups. World Scientific, 1989

    work page 1989

  74. [74]

    Tachikawa and K

    Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,Why are fractional charges of orientifolds compatible with Dirac quantization?,SciPost Phys.7(2019), no. 5 058, [arXiv:1805.02772]

    work page arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Hason, Z

    I. Hason, Z. Komargodski, and R. Thorngren,Anomaly Matching in the Symmetry Broken Phase: Domain Walls, CPT, and the Smith Isomorphism,SciPost Phys.8 (2020), no. 4 062, [arXiv:1910.14039]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    C´ ordova, K

    C. C´ ordova, K. Ohmori, S.-H. Shao, and F. Yan,DecoratedZ 2 symmetry defects and their time-reversal anomalies,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 4 045019, [arXiv:1910.14046]. 49

    work page arXiv 2020