pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.04308 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Fluctuation conductivity in ultraclean multicomponent superconductors

Sondre Duna Lundemo , Asle Sudb{\o} This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords fluctuation conductivityultraclean limitmulticomponent superconductorsGaussian fluctuationsoptical conductivitycritical behaviortype-II superconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

In ultraclean multicomponent superconductors the enhancement of DC conductivity due to fluctuations follows the same critical behavior as in the diffusive limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates intrinsic fluctuation conductivity in metals with multiply sheeted Fermi surfaces near a superconducting critical point, restricting attention to the ultraclean limit for extreme type-II multicomponent superconductors. Functional-integral techniques yield the Gaussian fluctuation action, from which the gauge-invariant electromagnetic linear response kernel is obtained to compute the optical conductivity tensor. Essential conditions are identified for a nonzero dissipative part of the longitudinal conductivity in a disorder-free and translationally invariant system, which derives from the multicomponent character of the incipient superconducting order and the parent metallic state. Under these conditions, the enhancement of the DC conductivity due to fluctuations close to the critical point follows the same critical behavior as in the diffusive limit.

Core claim

We derive the Gaussian fluctuation action for multicomponent superconductors in the ultraclean limit and obtain the optical conductivity tensor. The multicomponent character allows a nonzero dissipative longitudinal conductivity without disorder. Consequently, the fluctuation-induced enhancement of DC conductivity near the critical point follows the same critical behavior as in the diffusive limit.

What carries the argument

Gauge-invariant electromagnetic linear response kernel derived from the Gaussian fluctuation action using functional-integral techniques.

If this is right

  • The optical conductivity tensor can be computed explicitly in the ultraclean limit for these systems.
  • A dissipative longitudinal response appears indirectly from the multicomponent Fermi surface and order parameter structure.
  • The critical scaling of the conductivity enhancement near Tc is independent of whether the system is clean or diffusive under the stated conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This result suggests that transport experiments on clean samples of materials with multiple Fermi sheets could detect fluctuation conductivity effects comparable to those in disordered samples.
  • The approach may extend to other multicomponent systems where similar symmetry considerations allow dissipation without explicit scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The multicomponent character of both the superconducting order and the metallic state suffices to generate a nonzero dissipative longitudinal conductivity in a disorder-free translationally invariant system.

What would settle it

A measurement or calculation showing that the DC conductivity enhancement near the critical point follows a different critical exponent in an ultraclean multicomponent superconductor than in the diffusive limit would falsify the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04308 by Asle Sudb{\o}, Sondre Duna Lundemo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the superconducting pairing allowed from the interaction considered in a two-band model. The blue and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagrammatic representation of Dyson equation for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fluctuation corrections to the electromagnetic response kernel with fermion band labels included. Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Triangle vertex block appearing in AL diagram. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic graphical representation of the fluctuation kernel that contributes to the regular conductivity in the uniform [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Regular part of longitudinal conductivity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the intrinsic fluctuation conductivity in metals with multiply sheeted Fermi surfaces approaching a superconducting critical point. Restricting our attention to extreme type-II multicomponent superconductors motivates focusing on the ultraclean limit. Using functional-integral techniques, we derive the Gaussian fluctuation action from which we obtain the gauge-invariant electromagnetic linear response kernel. This allows us to compute the optical conductivity tensor. We identify essential conditions required for a nonzero dissipative part of the longitudinal conductivity in a disorder-free and translationally invariant system. Specifically, this derives indirectly from the multicomponent character of the incipient superconducting order and the parent metallic state. Under these conditions, the enhancement of the DC conductivity due to fluctuations close to the critical point follows the same critical behavior as in the diffusive limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in ultraclean multicomponent superconductors with multiply sheeted Fermi surfaces, functional-integral techniques yield a Gaussian fluctuation action and gauge-invariant electromagnetic response kernel from which the optical conductivity tensor is computed. It identifies conditions arising from the multicomponent character of both the incipient order parameter and the parent metallic state that produce a nonzero dissipative part of the longitudinal conductivity even in a disorder-free, translationally invariant system, and concludes that the resulting enhancement of DC conductivity near the critical point obeys the same critical scaling as in the diffusive limit.

Significance. If the derivation of the response kernel is correct, the result is significant because it establishes universality of the paraconductivity critical exponent across clean and dirty regimes for multicomponent systems. This is relevant to materials with multi-sheet Fermi surfaces (e.g., MgB2 or certain iron-based superconductors) where the ultraclean limit is experimentally accessible, and it supplies a microscopic, gauge-invariant foundation rather than phenomenological assumptions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the gauge-invariant linear response kernel] The central claim that the DC paraconductivity enhancement follows the diffusive-limit critical behavior rests on the response kernel producing a finite Re[σ(ω→0)] from multicomponent effects alone. The manuscript must explicitly exhibit the intercomponent or interband matrix elements in the kernel (or the relevant current-current correlator) that generate this dissipation once all symmetries are enforced; without that step, the equivalence of exponents cannot be verified and the weakest assumption remains untested.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from stating the explicit critical exponent obtained for the DC conductivity enhancement (or the functional form of the kernel) to allow immediate comparison with known diffusive results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of establishing universality of the paraconductivity exponent across clean and dirty regimes in multicomponent systems. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the gauge-invariant linear response kernel] The central claim that the DC paraconductivity enhancement follows the diffusive-limit critical behavior rests on the response kernel producing a finite Re[σ(ω→0)] from multicomponent effects alone. The manuscript must explicitly exhibit the intercomponent or interband matrix elements in the kernel (or the relevant current-current correlator) that generate this dissipation once all symmetries are enforced; without that step, the equivalence of exponents cannot be verified and the weakest assumption remains untested.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit form of the intercomponent matrix elements must be displayed to allow independent verification of the dissipation mechanism. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, an appendix) that writes out the current-current correlator in the multi-band basis. The off-diagonal elements between distinct Fermi sheets arise directly from the gauge-invariant coupling of the multicomponent order-parameter fluctuations to the interband current operator; after enforcing translational invariance and time-reversal symmetry these terms produce a nonzero Re[σ(ω→0)] whose temperature dependence matches the diffusive-limit exponent. This addition will make the equivalence of critical behaviors fully traceable from the kernel. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from microscopic action via functional integrals to gauge-invariant kernel is self-contained

full rationale

The paper starts from a functional-integral representation of the microscopic action for a multicomponent superconductor with multiply sheeted Fermi surface, derives the Gaussian fluctuation action, extracts the gauge-invariant electromagnetic linear response kernel, and computes the optical conductivity tensor. The nonzero dissipative part of the longitudinal conductivity is shown to arise directly from the multicomponent character of both the order parameter and the parent metallic state, without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The claimed equivalence of the DC paraconductivity critical behavior to the diffusive limit follows from this explicit kernel evaluation under the stated conditions, rather than reducing to an input by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; the derivation chain remains independent of its target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard functional-integral techniques for Gaussian fluctuations and on the assumption that the multicomponent Fermi surface permits a dissipative longitudinal response; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gaussian fluctuation approximation near the critical point
    Invoked to derive the fluctuation action from the functional integral.
  • standard math Gauge invariance of the electromagnetic response kernel
    Required to obtain the physical conductivity tensor.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 1199 out tokens · 48517 ms · 2026-05-16T16:08:55.144714+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Divergent spin conductivity on the verge of ferromagnetic quantum criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Spin conductivity diverges near ferromagnetic quantum criticality from critical fluctuations, interpreted as incipient spin superfluidity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    These are found by reading off the paramagnetic and diamagnetic four-currents that appear in the free theory after minimal substitution [25]

    Bare electromagnetic vertices The fluctuation corrections involve the bare electromagnetic vertices,γ µ a andγ µν a . These are found by reading off the paramagnetic and diamagnetic four-currents that appear in the free theory after minimal substitution [25]. Performing one functional derivative yields the paramagnetic four-current with components j0 p(x)...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (17a) with the vertex in Eq

    AL diagram The AL diagram is found by computing the trace in Eq. (17a) with the vertex in Eq. (B3). This yields K µν AL(x, x′) =− X abcd Z 4Y i=1 dyiLab(y1, y2)Λµ bc(y2, y3;x)L cd(y3, y4)Λν da(y4, y1;x ′) =−4e 2X abcd X ab sbascasdbsab Z 4Y i=1 dyi Z 4Y j=1 dzjLab(y1, y2)Lcd(y3, y4) ×G 0,a(y2, z1)γµ a (z1, z2;x)G 0,a(z2, y3) ˜G0,a(y3, y2) (B16) ×G 0,b(y4,...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the third line of Eq

    MT diagram The MT diagram is found by computing the trace in Eq. (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the third line of Eq. (B6). This yields K µν MT(x, x′) = X ab Z 2Y i=1 dyiLab(y1, y2) [ΓMT]µν ba (y2, y1;x, x ′) =−2e 2X ab X a saasba Z 2Y i=1 dyi Z 4Y j=1 dziLab(y1, y2) ×G 0,a(y2, z1)γν a (z1, z2;x ′)G0,a(z2, y1) ˜G0,a(y1, z3)˜γµ a (z3, z4;x) ˜G0,a...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the first and second line of Eq

    DOS diagram The DOS diagram is found by computing the trace in Eq. (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the first and second line of Eq. (B6). This yields K µν DOS(x, x′) = X ab Z 2Y i=1 dyiLab(y1, y2) [ΓDOS]µν ba (y2, y1;x, x ′) =−2e 2X ab X a saasba Z 2Y i=1 dyi Z 4Y j=1 dziLab(y1, y2) × G0,a(y2, z1)γµ a (z1, z2;x)G 0,a(z2, z3)γν a (z3, z4;x ′)G0,a(...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the last line of Eq

    DIA diagram Finally, the DIA diagram is found by computing the trace in Eq. (17b) with the part of Γ µν appearing in the last line of Eq. (B6). This yields K µν DIA(x, x′) = X ab Z 2Y i=1 dyiLab(y1, y2) [ΓDIA]µν ba (y2, y1;x, x ′) = 2e2X ab X a saasba Z 2Y i=1 dyi Z 2Y j=1 dzjLab(y1, y2) ×G 0,a(y2, z1)γµν a (z1, z2;x, x ′)G0,a(z2, y1) ˜G0,a(y1, y2). (B25)...

    work page

  6. [6]

    L. N. Cooper, Bound Electron Pairs in a Degenerate Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev.104, 1189 (1956)

    work page 1956

  7. [7]

    A. J. Leggett, Number-Phase Fluctuations in Two-Band Superconductors, Prog Theor Phys36, 901 (1966)

    work page 1966

  8. [8]

    Stanev and Z

    V. Stanev and Z. Tesanovi´ c, Three-band superconduc- tivity and the order parameter that breaks time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B81, 134522 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    T. A. Bojesen, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Time rever- sal symmetry breakdown in normal and superconducting states in frustrated three-band systems, Phys. Rev. B88, 220511 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Lin and X

    S.-Z. Lin and X. Hu, Massless Leggett Mode in Three- Band Superconductors with Time-Reversal-Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 177005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Takahashi, Z

    Y. Takahashi, Z. Huang, and X. Hu, H–T Phase Dia- gram of Multi-component Superconductors with Frus- trated Inter-component Couplings, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.83, 034701 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Babaev, A

    E. Babaev, A. Sudbø, and N. W. Ashcroft, A supercon- ductor to superfluid phase transition in liquid metallic hydrogen, Nature431, 666 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Smiseth, E

    J. Smiseth, E. Smørgrav, and A. Sudbø, Critical proper- ties of theN-color london model, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 077002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Smiseth, E

    J. Smiseth, E. Smørgrav, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Field- and temperature-induced topological phase tran- sitions in the three-dimensionalN-component london su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. B71, 214509 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    E. V. Herland, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Phase transi- tions in a three dimensionalU(1)×U(1) lattice London superconductor: Metallic superfluid and charge-4esuper- conducting states, Phys. Rev. B82, 134511 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    T. A. Bojesen, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Phase tran- sitions and anomalous normal state in superconductors with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B89, 104509 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    M. O. Soldini, M. H. Fischer, and T. Neupert, Charge- 4esuperconductivity in a hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214509 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    V. L. Ginzburg, Sov. Phys. Solid State2, 1824 (1960)

    work page 1960

  19. [19]

    Maki, The Critical Fluctuation of the Order Param- eter in Type-II Superconductors, Prog Theor Phys39, 897 (1968)

    K. Maki, The Critical Fluctuation of the Order Param- eter in Type-II Superconductors, Prog Theor Phys39, 897 (1968)

    work page 1968

  20. [20]

    L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin, The influence of fluc- tuation pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal, Physics Letters A26, 238 (1968)

    work page 1968

  21. [21]

    L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin, Effect of Fluctuations on the Properties of a Superconductor Above the Critical Temperature, Sov. Phys. Solid State10, 875 (1968)

    work page 1968

  22. [22]

    R. S. Thompson, Microwave, Flux Flow, and Fluctuation Resistance of Dirty Type-II Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B1, 327 (1970)

    work page 1970

  23. [23]

    A. A. Varlamov, A. Galda, and A. Glatz, Fluctuation spectroscopy: From Rayleigh-Jeans waves to Abrikosov vortex clusters, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Larkin and A

    A. Larkin and A. Varlamov,Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Reggiani, R

    L. Reggiani, R. Vaglio, and A. A. Varlamov, Fluctuation conductivity of layered high-T c superconductors: A the- oretical analysis of recent experiments, Phys. Rev. B44, 9541 (1991)

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    A. G. Aronov, S. Hikami, and A. I. Larkin, Gauge invari- ance and transport properties in superconductors above Tc, Phys. Rev. B51, 3880 (1995)

    work page 1995

  27. [27]

    J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Ground-State Energy of a Many-Fermion System. II, Phys. Rev.118, 1417 (1960)

    work page 1960

  28. [28]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Conservation Laws and Correlation Functions, Phys. Rev.124, 287 (1961)

    work page 1961

  29. [29]

    Baym, Self-Consistent Approximations in Many-Body Systems, Phys

    G. Baym, Self-Consistent Approximations in Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev.127, 1391 (1962)

    work page 1962

  30. [30]

    J. R. Schrieffer,Theory Of Superconductivity(Avalon Publishing, 1999)

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Rickayzen,Theory of Superconductivity, Monographs and Texts in Physics and Astronomy, Vol

    G. Rickayzen,Theory of Superconductivity, Monographs and Texts in Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 14 (John Wiley & Sons, 1965)

    work page 1965

  32. [32]

    Boyack, Restoring gauge invariance in conventional fluctuation corrections to a superconductor, Phys

    R. Boyack, Restoring gauge invariance in conventional fluctuation corrections to a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B98, 184504 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Dupuis,Field Theory of Condensed Matter and Ul- tracold Gases: Volume 1(WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EU- ROPE), 2023)

    N. Dupuis,Field Theory of Condensed Matter and Ul- tracold Gases: Volume 1(WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EU- ROPE), 2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Wulin, B

    D. Wulin, B. M. Fregoso, H. Guo, C.-C. Chien, and K. Levin, Conductivity in pseudogapped superconduc- tors: A sum-rule-consistent preformed-pair scenario, Phys. Rev. B84, 140509 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Guo, C.-C

    H. Guo, C.-C. Chien, and Y. He, Theories of Linear Re- sponse in BCS Superfluids and How They Meet Funda- mental Constraints, J Low Temp Phys172, 5 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Guo, C.-C

    H. Guo, C.-C. Chien, Y. He, and K. Levin, Fundamental constraints on linear response theories of fermi superflu- ids above and belowT c, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B27, 1330010 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    B. M. Anderson, R. Boyack, C.-T. Wu, and K. Levin, Going beyond the BCS level in the superfluid path in- tegral: A consistent treatment of electrodynamics and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. B93, 180504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Boyack, C.-T

    R. Boyack, C.-T. Wu, B. M. Anderson, and K. Levin, Collective mode contributions to the Meissner effect: Fulde-Ferrell and pair-density wave superfluids, Phys. Rev. B95, 214501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Boyack and P

    R. Boyack and P. L. e. S. Lopes, Electromagnetic re- sponse of superconductors in the presence of multiple collective modes, Phys. Rev. B101, 094509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    H. Suhl, B. T. Matthias, and L. R. Walker, Bardeen- Cooper-Schrieffer Theory of Superconductivity in the Case of Overlapping Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 552 (1959)

    work page 1959

  41. [41]

    A. E. Koshelev, A. A. Varlamov, and V. M. Vinokur, Theory of fluctuations in a two-band superconductor: MgB2, Phys. Rev. B72, 064523 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Fanfarillo, L

    L. Fanfarillo, L. Benfatto, S. Caprara, C. Castellani, and M. Grilli, Theory of fluctuation conductivity from inter- band pairing in pnictide superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 79, 172508 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory, third edition ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Kleinert, Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation: Suc- cesses, Failure, and Cure, Electron

    H. Kleinert, Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation: Suc- cesses, Failure, and Cure, Electron. J. Theor. Phys.8, 57 (2011). 20

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Watanabe and H

    S. Watanabe and H. Watanabe, Gauge-invariant electromagnetic responses in superconductors (2025), arXiv:2501.13722 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    D. V. Livanov, G. Savona, and A. A. Varlamov, Strong compensation of the quantum fluctuation corrections in a clean superconductor, Phys. Rev. B62, 8675 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    N. A. Stepanov and M. A. Skvortsov, Superconducting fluctuations at arbitrary disorder strength, Phys. Rev. B 97, 144517 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Grinenko, D

    V. Grinenko, D. Weston, F. Caglieris, C. Wuttke, C. Hess, T. Gottschall, I. Maccari, D. Gorbunov, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, A. Rydh, K. Kihou, C.- H. Lee, R. Sarkar, S. Dengre, J. Garaud, A. Char- nukha, R. H¨ uhne, K. Nielsch, B. B¨ uchner, H.-H. Klauss, and E. Babaev, State with spontaneously broken time- reversal symmetry above the superconducting ph...

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Shipulin, N

    I. Shipulin, N. Stegani, I. Maccari, K. Kihou, C.-H. Lee, Q. Hu, Y. Zheng, F. Yang, Y. Li, C.-M. Yim, R. H¨ uhne, H.-H. Klauss, M. Putti, F. Caglieris, E. Babaev, and V. Grinenko, Calorimetric evidence for two phase transi- tions in Ba 1−xKxFe2As2 with fermion pairing and qua- drupling states, Nat Commun14, 6734 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Samoilenka and E

    A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Microscopic theory of elec- tron quadrupling condensates (2025), arXiv:2505.12542 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Dzero, M

    M. Dzero, M. Khodas, and A. Levchenko, Transport anomalies in multiband superconductors near the quan- tum critical point, Phys. Rev. B108, 184513 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Gindikin, S

    Y. Gindikin, S. Li, A. Levchenko, A. Kamenev, A. V. Chubukov, and D. L. Maslov, Quantum criticality and optical conductivity in a two-valley system, Phys. Rev. B110, 085139 (2024)

    work page 2024