pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16016 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-22 · 🌀 gr-qc

Nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields around a black hole

Caiying Shao , Zhen-Tao He , Jiageng Jiao , Jingqi Lai , Jun-Xi Shi , Yu Tian , Dandan Yuan , Hongbao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords nonlinear tailsmassive scalar fieldsblack hole ringdownquasinormal modesscalar perturbationslate-time behaviorgravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields around black holes decay at the same rate as linear tails in intermediate times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how massive scalar fields behave when perturbed nonlinearly around a black hole. It reveals that the nonlinear tails decay at the same rate as their linear counterparts during intermediate times, in contrast to massless scalar fields where nonlinear effects change the decay. The result holds across toy models that include ingoing and outgoing sources as well as self-interacting scalars, and it does not depend on specific source parameters or initial conditions. These tails matter because they shape the late-time ringdown signals that gravitational-wave detectors could observe. The authors point out that quadratic quasinormal modes may still serve as a distinct probe of nonlinear effects even when the tail decay matches the linear prediction.

Core claim

The central claim is that the nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields decay at the same rate as linear tails in the intermediate time, independent of source parameters or initial conditions. This behavior is opposite to that found for massless scalar fields. The study reaches this conclusion by evolving toy models that incorporate ingoing and outgoing sources together with a self-interacting scalar model, then directly comparing the extracted power-law decay rates to those of the corresponding linear perturbations. The work concludes that quadratic quasinormal modes remain available as a potential signature of nonlinearity for massive fields.

What carries the argument

Numerical solutions of the nonlinear evolution equations for a massive scalar field with self-interaction on a black-hole background, used to extract and compare late-time tail decay rates against linear theory.

If this is right

  • Late-time ringdown signals involving massive fields would follow the same power-law decay predicted by linear perturbation theory in the intermediate window.
  • Nonlinear contributions would not alter the tail decay exponent itself but could appear in other observables such as quadratic quasinormal modes.
  • The reported independence from source details implies the decay rate is a robust feature of massive scalar dynamics around black holes.
  • Modeling of astrophysical scenarios with massive scalar fields around black holes can safely use linear tail formulas for intermediate times while checking quadratic modes separately for nonlinearity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gravitational-wave searches for massive field signals around black holes may need to rely more on quadratic mode frequencies than on tail decay slopes to identify nonlinear physics.
  • The same linear-like tail behavior might appear when massive scalars represent ultralight dark matter clouds, simplifying certain waveform templates.
  • Extending the analysis to Kerr black holes would test whether black-hole spin preserves or breaks the reported equivalence of nonlinear and linear decay rates.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen toy models with ingoing and outgoing sources plus the self-interacting scalar term capture the dominant nonlinear dynamics without higher-order corrections or numerical artifacts changing the reported decay rates.

What would settle it

A high-resolution numerical evolution or gravitational-wave observation in which the intermediate-time decay rate of a nonlinear massive scalar tail differs measurably from the linear rate would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16016 by Caiying Shao, Dandan Yuan, Hongbao Zhang, Jiageng Jiao, Jingqi Lai, Jun-Xi Shi, Yu Tian, Zhen-Tao He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time evolution of massless scalar perturbations, co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Quasinormal oscillations and tails of massive scala [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temporal evolution of massless and massive scalar pe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temporal evolution of massive scalar perturbations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temporal evolution of massive scalar perturbations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonlinear effects play a fundamental role in the late-time ringdown of black holes, with direct implications for gravitational-wave observations. For massive fields, these dynamics become richer, yet their nonlinear signatures remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically study nonlinear tails of massive scalar perturbations, from a toy model with ingoing and outgoing sources to a self-interacting scalar model, revealing nonlinear tails and contrasting the results with their linear counterparts. We find that the nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields, opposite to massless ones, decay as the same rate as linear tails in the intermediate time, independent of source parameters or initial conditions. Nevertheless, quadratic quasinormal modes could serve as a probe to the nonlinear effects of massive fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear tails of massive scalar perturbations around black holes via toy models with ingoing/outgoing sources and a self-interacting scalar field. It reports that, unlike the massless case, the nonlinear tails decay at the same rate as linear tails in the intermediate-time regime, independent of source parameters and initial conditions, and proposes quadratic quasinormal modes as probes of nonlinearity.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the finding identifies a distinctive dynamical feature of massive-field nonlinearities relative to massless ones, with potential relevance for late-time gravitational-wave ringdown modeling. The claimed parameter independence would strengthen the result's generality.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical implementation and results sections] The central claim that nonlinear and linear tails share the identical intermediate-time decay rate rests on numerical extraction of power-law indices, yet no convergence tests, resolution studies, error estimates, or validation against the linear limit are reported for the self-interacting model; this leaves open whether the reported agreement is physical or an artifact of truncation error in the quadratic source terms or insufficient grid resolution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the numerical scheme and how the decay rates were extracted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concern below and will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical implementation and results sections] The central claim that nonlinear and linear tails share the identical intermediate-time decay rate rests on numerical extraction of power-law indices, yet no convergence tests, resolution studies, error estimates, or validation against the linear limit are reported for the self-interacting model; this leaves open whether the reported agreement is physical or an artifact of truncation error in the quadratic source terms or insufficient grid resolution.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit convergence tests, resolution studies, error estimates, and linear-limit validation for the self-interacting model is a genuine limitation of the current manuscript. While our numerical evolutions were performed with resolutions that we found sufficient for the reported qualitative and quantitative features, these tests were not documented. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) presenting (i) results at multiple grid resolutions with quantitative error estimates on the extracted power-law indices, (ii) direct comparison of the nonlinear evolution against the corresponding linear run (setting the self-interaction coefficient to zero), and (iii) evidence that the quadratic source terms remain well-resolved. These additions will confirm that the reported agreement between linear and nonlinear decay rates is physical. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: result follows from explicit numerical comparison of linear and nonlinear models

full rationale

The paper reports a numerical finding that nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields decay at the same intermediate-time rate as linear tails, independent of source parameters or initial conditions. This emerges from direct simulations of the described toy models (ingoing/outgoing sources plus self-interaction) contrasted against their linear counterparts. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The derivation chain remains self-contained through explicit model evolution and rate extraction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of general relativity and linear/nonlinear perturbation theory around black holes; no free parameters, ad-hoc constants, or new postulated entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spacetime is governed by general relativity
    Implicit foundation for all black-hole perturbation calculations.
  • domain assumption Perturbation theory remains valid for the scalar field evolution
    Required to separate linear and nonlinear contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1338 out tokens · 49306 ms · 2026-05-16T12:11:18.016104+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can Oscillatory and Persistent Nonlinearities Be Bridged in Black Hole Ringdown?

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quadratic quasinormal modes and Christodoulou memory effect are related through bridge coefficients depending primarily on remnant black hole parameters.

  2. Can Oscillatory and Persistent Nonlinearities Be Bridged in Black Hole Ringdown?

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quadratic quasinormal modes and the memory effect in black hole ringdown are related through bridge coefficients that depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 25 internal anchors

  1. [2]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties of the Binary Black Hol e Merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [3]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with G W150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (201 8)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [4]

    Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multi-Band Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics

    E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain, Theory-Agnos tic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multib and Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241104 (2016), arXiv:1603.04075 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [5]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    E. Berti et al. , Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrop hysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [6]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084002 (2016), arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [7]

    Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Extreme Gravity Tests wit h Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 46 (2018), arXiv:1801.03208 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [8]

    Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme Gravity T ests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 49 (2018), arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [9]

    H. O. Silva, A. Ghosh, and A. Buonanno, Black-hole ringdo wn as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044030 (2023), arXiv:2205.05132 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [10]

    C. Shi, J. Bao, H. Wang, J.-d. Zhang, Y. Hu, A. Sesana, E. B arausse, J. Mei, and J. Luo, Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary results on testing the no-hair th eorem with ringdown signals, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044036 (2019), arXiv:1902.08922 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [11]

    C.-Y. Shao, Y. Hu, and C.-G. Shao, Parameter estimation for Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with ringdown sig- nals*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 105101 (2023), arXiv:2307.02084 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [12]

    P. A.-S. et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser interferom eter space antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM ]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [13]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for grav itational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev. 4, 685 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [14]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luo et al. (TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave dete ctor, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [15]

    Y. Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang, Concepts and status of Chine se space gravitational wave detection projects, Nature Astron. 5, 881 (2021), arXiv:2109.07442 [astro-ph.IM]. 9

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [16]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal m odes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [17]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativist ic gravitational collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational per turbations, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972)

    work page 1972

  17. [18]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical Perturbations of Relativist ic Gravitational Collapse. II. Integer-Spin, Zero-Rest-M ass Fields, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2439 (1972)

    work page 1972

  18. [19]

    Late-Time Behavior of Stellar Collapse and Explosions: I. Linearized Perturbations

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Late time behavi or of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized pertur bations, Phys. Rev. D49, 883 (1994), arXiv:arXiv:gr-qc/9307009 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  19. [20]

    R. F. Rosato and P. Pani, Universality of late-time ring down tails, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024080 (2025), arXiv:2505.08877 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Radiative Tail of Realistic Rotating Gravitational Collapse

    S. Hod, The Radiative tail of realistic gravitational c ollapse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 10 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9907096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  21. [22]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, and P. Pani, Is the gravitationa l-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 089902 (201 6)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [23]

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, W. M. Suen, and K. Young, Wave p ropagation in gravitational systems: Late time behavior, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2118 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9507035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  23. [24]

    Late-Time Tails of Wave Propagation in Higher Dimensional Spacetimes

    V. Cardoso, S. Yoshida, O. J. C. Dias, and J. P. S. Lemos, L ate time tails of wave propagation in higher dimensional space-times, Phys. Rev. D 68, 061503 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0307122

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  24. [25]

    Late-Time Tails in Gravitational Collapse of a Self-Interacting (Massive) Scalar-Field and Decay of a Self-Interacting Scalar Hair

    S. Hod and T. Piran, Late time tails in gravitational col lapse of a selfinteracting (massive) scalar field and decay of a selfinteracting scalar hair, Phys. Rev. D 58, 044018 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9801059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [26]

    Slowly decaying tails of massive scalar fields in spherically symmetric spacetimes

    H. Koyama and A. Tomimatsu, Slowly decaying tails of mas sive scalar fields in spherically symmetric space-times, Phys. Rev. D 65, 084031 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  26. [27]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Massive charged scalar fi eld in the Kerr-Newman background I: quasinormal modes, late-time tails and stability, Phys. Rev. D 88, 024054 (2013), arXiv:1307.1812 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [28]

    L. M. Burko and G. Khanna, Universality of massive scala r field late time tails in black hole space-times, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044018 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0403018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [29]

    Late-time tail of a coupled scalar field in the background of a black hole with a global monopole

    S. Chen and J. Jing, Late-time behavior of a coupled scal ar field in background of a Schwarzschild black hole with a glo bal monopole, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 359 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0511098

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [30]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Asymptotic tails of mass ive gravitons in light of pulsar timing array observations, Phys. Lett. B 853, 138685 (2024), arXiv:2307.01110 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [31]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and A. Zhidenko, Massive fields affected by echoes: New physics vs. astrophysical envir onment, JCAP 10, 027, arXiv:2411.09014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  31. [32]

    Possible discovery of a nonlinear tail and second-order quasinormal modes in black hole ringdown

    S. Okuzumi, K. Ioka, and M.-a. Sakagami, Possible Disco very of Nonlinear Tail and Quasinormal Modes in Black Hole Ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 77, 124018 (2008), arXiv:0803.0501 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [33]

    Mitman et al., Phys

    K. Mitman et al. , Nonlinearities in Black Hole Ringdowns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081402 (2023), arXiv:2208.07380 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [34]

    M. H.-Y. Cheung et al. , Nonlinear Effects in Black Hole Ringdown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081401 (2023), arXiv:2208.07374 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [35]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, AdS perspective on the nonlin ear tails in black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084068 (2025), arXiv:2506.14475 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [36]

    Ianniccari, L

    A. Ianniccari, L. Lo Bianco, and A. Riotto, The nonlinea r tails in black hole ringdown: the scattering perspective, JCAP 10, 062, arXiv:2507.17732 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  36. [37]

    J. D. ´Alvares and A. Va˜ no-Vi˜ nuales, Charged scalar field at futu re null infinity via nonlinear hyperboloidal evolution, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104053 (2025), arXiv:2506.15311 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    De Amicis et al., (2024), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    M. De Amicis et al., Late-Time Tails in Nonlinear Evolutions of Merging Black H oles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171401 (2025), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. K idder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computa tion of late-time tails, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024003 (2025), arXiv:2412.06906 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Nonlinear tails of gravitati onal waves in Schwarzschild black hole ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024023 (2025), arXiv:2504.06224 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    Cardoso, G

    V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. De Amicis, F. Duque, T. Katagi ri, D. Pereniguez, J. Redondo-Yuste, T. F. M. Spieksma, and Z. Zhong, Hushing black holes: Tails in dynami cal spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 109, L121502 (2024), arXiv:2405.12290 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [42]

    S. Ling, S. Shah, and S. S. C. Wong, Dynamical nonlinear t ails in the Schwarzschild black hole ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024008 (2025), arXiv:2503.19967 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    Z.-T. He, J. Du, J. Jiao, C. Shao, J. Shi, Y. Tian, and H. Zh ang, Numerical computation of electromagnetically source d nonlinear tails, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104008 (2025), arXiv:2508.20499 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Berti et al. , Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, (2025 ), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    Gravitational Wave Memory from Gamma Ray Bursts' Jets

    O. Birnholtz and T. Piran, Gravitational wave memory fr om gamma ray bursts’ jets, Phys. Rev. D 87, 123007 (2013), arXiv:1302.5713 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [46]

    Albanesi, S

    S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, T. Damour, A. Nagar, and A. Pla cidi, Faithful effective-one-body waveform of small-mass- ratio co- alescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning c ase, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084037 (2023), arXiv:2305.19336 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [47]

    Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme ma ss ratio inspirals, Living Reviews in Relativity 21, 4 (2018)

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme ma ss ratio inspirals, Living Reviews in Relativity 21, 4 (2018). 10

    work page 2018

  47. [48]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta , C. P. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based interferometer lisa . v. extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Physical Review D 95, 103012 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [49]

    Zi and C

    T. Zi and C. Zhang, Detecting massive vector fields with e xtreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104062 (2025), arXiv:2406.11724 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reacti on in general relativity, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 016904 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [51]

    Mining information from binary black hole mergers: a comparison of estimation methods for complex exponentials in noise

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez, and U. Sperhake, Mi ning information from binary black hole mergers: A Comparis on of estimation methods for complex exponentials in noise, Ph ys. Rev. D 75, 124017 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [52]

    L. E. Simone and C. M. Will, Massive scalar quasinormal m odes of Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 963 (1992)

    work page 1992