pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16908 · v1 · pith:5LUBJEMRnew · submitted 2026-01-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Doping-dependent orbital magnetism in Chromium pnictides

Henri G. Mendon\c{c}a , George B. Martins , Lauro B. Braz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 15:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords chromium pnictidesorbital magnetismelectron dopingmagnetic phase diagramincommensurate orderLaCrAsOrandom phase approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron doping in LaCrAsO switches the system between commensurate antiferromagnetic states tied to localized d3z2-r2 electrons and incommensurate states driven by itinerant dxy electrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the magnetic phase diagram of LaCrAsO as electrons are added to the parent compound. It finds that low doping favors an antiferromagnetic state with opposite spins on different chromium sites, followed by a stripe antiferromagnetic phase at higher doping. At still higher doping these two states reappear but with incommensurate ordering vectors. The calculations link the commensurate phases to more localized electrons in the d3z2-r2 orbital and the incommensurate phases to the dxy orbital, whose larger overlap promotes itinerant magnetism. A sympathetic reader would care because the result offers a concrete orbital mechanism that converts doping into changes in magnetic ordering type and character.

Core claim

Using the matrix random-phase approximation on a tight-binding or DFT-derived band structure, the work shows that electron doping in LaCrAsO first stabilizes a commensurate antiferromagnetic state, then a stripe antiferromagnetic state; at higher doping both reappear with incommensurate magnetic vectors. The commensurate instabilities are carried by more localized electrons in the Cr d3z2-r2 orbital, whereas the incommensurate instabilities are carried by the dxy orbital whose stronger overlap favors itinerant-electron magnetism.

What carries the argument

Matrix random-phase approximation applied to the multi-orbital band structure, which computes the doping-dependent magnetic susceptibility and identifies the leading orbital-resolved instabilities.

If this is right

  • At low electron doping the ground state is a commensurate antiferromagnet with opposite spins on the two Cr sublattices.
  • Intermediate doping stabilizes a stripe antiferromagnetic phase.
  • Still higher doping restores both phases but with incommensurate ordering vectors.
  • The switch from commensurate to incommensurate order tracks a change from localized d3z2-r2 to itinerant dxy orbital character.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same orbital-selectivity mechanism may operate in other chromium pnictides when carriers are added by substitution or pressure.
  • If the dxy-driven incommensurate state can be stabilized near a superconducting dome, it would suggest a route to test whether itinerant magnetism competes with or promotes pairing.
  • The sequence implies that modest further doping or strain could be used to toggle between localized and itinerant magnetism in a single material.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen tight-binding or DFT band structure together with a fixed set of interaction parameters is enough to determine the sequence of magnetic instabilities without vertex corrections or exact treatment of competing orders.

What would settle it

Neutron scattering measurements that track the evolution of magnetic ordering vectors with electron doping, combined with orbital-sensitive spectroscopy that confirms whether d3z2-r2 or dxy character dominates at each doping level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16908 by George B. Martins, Henri G. Mendon\c{c}a, Lauro B. Braz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Projected band structure in the d−orbitals (d3z 2−r 2 in green; dxz in red; dyz in blue; dx 2−y 2 in black; dxy in magenta) of the tight-binding Cr atoms for LaCrAsO along the symmetry lines Γ − X − M − Γ. (b) Density of states (DOS) for LaCrAsO. In panels (a) and (b), the grey regions indicate the doping studied in this work (n = 4.0 − 4.55). 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panels (a) to (d) shows the contribution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Panels (a) shows the critical Hubbard interaction strength U (s) c in the spin channel as a function of electron doping n. Colors in the scattered points denote the norm of the magnetic ordering vector at the instability Q. For visualization purposes, we indicate the different magnetic instabilities by colored regions of the diagram. In panel (b), we show the magnetic ordering vector Q and the density of s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spin density [∆¯ s]pp(r) mapping the magnetic texture (spin-up: red; spin-down: blue) at Cr sites (Site A: circle; Site B: square) under varying electron doping concentrations: n = 3.992 (panel a), n = 4.204 (panel b), n = 4.219 (panel c), n = 4.298 (panel d), n = 4.440 (panel e), and n = 4.533 (panel f). 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present results for the phase diagram of the parent compound LaCrAsO under electron doping using the matrix random-phase approximation. At low doping levels, the system stabilizes an antiferromagnetic state in which different Cr sublattices carry opposite spins, consistent with experimental observations. As the doping concentration increases, a stripe-type antiferromagnetic phase becomes favored. At even higher doping, the system repeats the two former magnetic states, but with incommensurate magnetic ordering vectors. The commensurate magnetic phases are associated with more localized electrons in the Cr $d_{3z^2-r^2}$ orbital, whereas the incommensurate phases are linked to the $d_{xy}$ orbital, whose stronger overlap favors itinerant-electron magnetism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the matrix random-phase approximation to a multi-orbital model of electron-doped LaCrAsO to map the evolution of magnetic instabilities with doping. It reports an antiferromagnetic state with opposite spins on Cr sublattices at low doping (consistent with experiment), a transition to stripe-type antiferromagnetism at intermediate doping, and repetition of both phases with incommensurate ordering vectors at higher doping. The commensurate instabilities are attributed to more localized electrons in the Cr d_{3z^2-r^2} orbital, while the incommensurate ones are linked to the d_{xy} orbital whose stronger overlap favors itinerant magnetism.

Significance. If the orbital-resolved assignment of instabilities survives scrutiny, the work would provide a concrete microscopic picture of how orbital character selects between localized and itinerant magnetism in Cr pnictides. The matrix RPA approach permits direct extraction of orbital weights in the leading eigenvectors, which is a useful technical feature for multi-orbital systems when the underlying band structure and interactions are adequately justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section (band-structure and interaction parameters): the central claim that d_{3z^2-r^2} drives commensurate order while d_{xy} drives incommensurate order rests on the orbital character of the RPA susceptibility eigenvectors. No explicit values for the interaction parameters (U, J, etc.), no source or convergence details for the tight-binding/DFT band structure, and no benchmark against experimental ordering vectors or other observables are provided. These inputs directly control which orbital dominates the leading instability at each doping, so their justification is load-bearing for the reported sequence.
  2. [Results] Results on doping evolution: the transition from commensurate to incommensurate order is obtained from the poles of the RPA susceptibility. The manuscript does not examine whether vertex corrections or self-energy renormalizations (known to be relevant for intermediate-correlation Cr d states) would shift the crossover doping or alter the orbital content of the leading eigenvector. A direct comparison with a method that includes these effects would be required to confirm that the reported orbital association is robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the low-doping AF state is 'consistent with experimental observations' but does not cite the specific experimental ordering vector or reference; adding this citation would strengthen the comparison.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the phase diagram should explicitly label the doping intervals corresponding to each magnetic phase to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will implement where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section (band-structure and interaction parameters): the central claim that d_{3z^2-r^2} drives commensurate order while d_{xy} drives incommensurate order rests on the orbital character of the RPA susceptibility eigenvectors. No explicit values for the interaction parameters (U, J, etc.), no source or convergence details for the tight-binding/DFT band structure, and no benchmark against experimental ordering vectors or other observables are provided. These inputs directly control which orbital dominates the leading instability at each doping, so their justification is load-bearing for the reported sequence.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the model parameters and their provenance is necessary to substantiate the orbital assignments. In the revised version we will add a dedicated Methods subsection that lists the interaction parameters (U, J_H, U', J') together with their origin in constrained-RPA estimates for Cr pnictides, specifies the DFT functional and k-mesh used to generate the tight-binding Hamiltonian, and reports convergence checks. We will also include a direct comparison of the calculated zero-doping ordering vector with the experimental neutron-scattering result for LaCrAsO. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results on doping evolution: the transition from commensurate to incommensurate order is obtained from the poles of the RPA susceptibility. The manuscript does not examine whether vertex corrections or self-energy renormalizations (known to be relevant for intermediate-correlation Cr d states) would shift the crossover doping or alter the orbital content of the leading eigenvector. A direct comparison with a method that includes these effects would be required to confirm that the reported orbital association is robust.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the RPA neglects vertex corrections and self-energy renormalizations, which can be quantitatively important for Cr d states. Within the present methodological scope, however, the matrix RPA already provides orbital-resolved eigenvectors that directly link the leading instability to a given orbital character; this diagnostic is unavailable in many other approximations. We will add a concise limitations paragraph in the Discussion that states the RPA approximation explicitly and notes that a systematic study including vertex corrections would require a different framework (e.g., fRG or DMFT+RPA) and is left for future work. No change to the reported RPA phase sequence is planned. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

RPA-derived orbital associations are direct outputs of susceptibility eigenvectors, not definitional reductions

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by constructing a multi-orbital tight-binding or DFT band structure, adding Hubbard interactions, and computing the matrix RPA susceptibility to locate doping-dependent poles that signal magnetic instabilities. The orbital assignments (commensurate phases linked to d_{3z^2-r^2} localization, incommensurate to d_{xy} itinerancy) are read off from the orbital-resolved eigenvectors at those poles. This is a standard forward calculation whose outputs are not equivalent to the input band parameters or interaction strengths by construction. No self-citation chain, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via prior work is required for the central claim. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as experimental ordering vectors and doping trends.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the matrix RPA for this multi-orbital system and on the assumption that the input electronic structure plus interaction parameters correctly capture the relevant physics; no free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Matrix random-phase approximation accurately identifies the leading magnetic instability as a function of doping.
    Invoked to generate the entire phase diagram.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5658 in / 1236 out tokens · 50862 ms · 2026-05-21T15:44:59.163631+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006) 17.doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 2006

  2. [2]

    N. P. Armitage, P. Fournier, R. L. Greene, Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2421.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.2421

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Ishida, A

    H. Ishida, A. Liebsch, Fermi-liquid, non-Fermi-liquid, and Mott phases in iron pnictides and cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 054513.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.81.054513

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Note that in this case the cuprates are being hole-doped and the Fe-SC are being electron-doped. 14 □π 0 π a) dx2□y2 Leading λ =0.000243 b) dxy Leading λ =0.000308 □π 0 π□π 0 π c) dxy Leading λ =0.000366 □π 0 π d) gxy(x2□y2) Leading λ =0.000329 □0.10 □0.05 0.0 0.05 0.10 □0.10 □0.05 0.0 0.05 0.10 □0.10 □0.05 0.0 0.05 0.10 □0.10 □0.05 0.0 0.05 0.10 Figure A...

    work page

  5. [5]

    J. M. Pizarro, M. J. Calderón, J. Liu, M. C. Muñoz, E. Bascones, Strong correlations and the search for high-Tc superconductivity in chromium pnic- tides and chalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 075115.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.95.075115

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Edelmann, G

    M. Edelmann, G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, L. de’ Medici, Chromium analogs of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 205118. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.205118

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.205118 2017

  7. [7]

    W.-S. Wang, M. Gao, Y . Yang, Y .-Y . Xiang, Q.-H. Wang, Possible supercon- ductivity in the electron-doped chromium pnictide LaOCrAs, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 144507.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.144507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.144507 2017

  8. [8]

    Note that, as Cu-doping in NaFe 1−xCuxAs has been shown to result in elec- tron doping of the FeAs planes [36], changingxfrom∼0.5 to 0, as done in Ref. [37], is an example of hole-doping a Fe-SC Mott-insulating phase and obtaining a SC phase with aT max c ∼11.5 K atx=0.019 [36], which is not as high as the above reasoning would suggest. However, one may a...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Singh, A

    Y . Singh, A. Ellern, D. C. Johnston, Physical Review B 79 (9) (2009) 094519.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094519, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.094519 2009

  10. [10]

    Singh, M

    Y . Singh, M. A. Green, Q. Huang, A. Kreyssig, R. J. McQueeney, D. C. Johnston, A. I. Goldman, Physical Review B 80 (10) (2009) 100403.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.100403, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.100403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.100403 2009

  11. [11]

    B. S. Jacobs, A. Pandey, bamn 2p2: Highest magnetic ordering tem- perature 122-pnictide compound, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7 (2023) 044410. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.044410. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7. 044410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.044410 2023

  12. [12]

    J.-K. Bao, H. Jiang, Y .-L. Sun, W.-H. Jiao, C.-Y . Shen, H.-J. Guo, Y . Chen, C.-M. Feng, H.-Q. Yuan, Z.-A. Xu, G.-H. Cao, R. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, K. Matsubayashi, Y . Uwatoko, Weakly ferromagnetic metallic state in heav- ily doped ba 1−xkxmn2as2, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 144523.doi:10.1103/ 16 PhysRevB.85.144523. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB....

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.144523 2012

  13. [13]

    Pandey, R

    A. Pandey, R. S. Dhaka, J. Lamsal, Y . Lee, V . K. Anand, A. Kreyssig, T. W. Heitmann, R. J. McQueeney, A. I. Goldman, B. N. Harmon, A. Kamin- ski, D. C. Johnston, Physical Review Letters 108 (8) (2012) 087005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.087005, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 087005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.087005 2012

  14. [14]

    N. S. Sangeetha, V . Smetana, A.-V . Mudring, D. C. Johnston, Antiferromag- netism in semiconducting srmn2sb2 and bamn2sb2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 014402.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014402. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.014402 2018

  15. [15]

    A. T. Satya, A. Mani, A. Arulraj, N. V . C. Shekar, K. Vinod, C. S. Sundar, A. Bharathi, Physical Review B 84 (18) (2011) 180515.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.84.180515, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180515

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.180515 2011

  16. [16]

    Pandey, V

    A. Pandey, V . K. Anand, D. C. Johnston, Physical Review B 84 (1) (2011) 014405.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.014405, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.014405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.014405 2011

  17. [17]

    Lamsal, G

    J. Lamsal, G. S. Tucker, T. W. Heitmann, A. Kreyssig, A. Jesche, A. Pandey, W. Tian, R. J. McQueeney, D. C. Johnston, A. I. Goldman, Physical Review B 87 (14) (2013) 144418.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.144418, [link]. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.144418

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.144418 2013

  18. [18]

    D. J. Singh, A. S. Sefat, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, D. Mandrus, L. H. Van- Bebber, V . Keppens, Itinerant antiferromagnetism in bacras2: Experimental characterization and electronic structure, Physical Review B 79 (9) (2009) 094429.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094429. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094429

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.094429 2009

  19. [19]

    Z. Ning, P. Das, Y . Lee, N. S. Sangeetha, D. L. Abernathy, D. C. John- ston, R. J. McQueeney, D. Vaknin, L. Ke, Spin dynamics in the itinerant antiferromagnet srcr2as2, Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025) 134438.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.111.134438. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.134438 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.134438 2025

  20. [20]

    U. B. Paramanik, R. Prasad, C. Geibel, Z. Hossain, Itinerant and local- moment magnetism in eucr2 as2 single crystals, Physical Review B - Con- densed Matter and Materials Physics 89 (14) (2014) 1–8.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.89.144423

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Nandi, Y

    S. Nandi, Y . Xiao, N. Qureshi, U. B. Paramanik, W. T. Jin, Y . Su, B. Oulad- diaf, Z. Hossain, T. Brückel, Magnetic structures of the eu and cr moments ineucr 2as2: Neutron diffraction study, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 094411. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094411. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094411

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.094411 2016

  22. [22]

    Langevin dynamics of fluctuation-induced first-order phase transitions: Self- consistent Hartree approximation

    K. Kubo, Pairing symmetry in a two-orbital hubbard model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 224509.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75. 224509. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.224509

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75 2007

  23. [23]

    Graser, T

    S. Graser, T. A. Maier, P. J. Hirschfeld, D. J. Scalapino, Near-degeneracy of several pairing channels in multiorbital models for the fe pnictides, New Journal of Physics 11 (2) (2009) 025016. URLhttp://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/11/i=2/a=025016

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. V . Chubukov, Low-energy microscopic models for iron-based superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 (2016) 014503. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/80/1/014503. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1361-6633/80/1/014503/meta?casa_token=XjO8PnhuG4oAAAAA: gofMFXJjs9D7SwV90rTULD2loWli2wwOS8hchbMWXOqwjPYXp1iJtesOJMSPzmsFPBZ0AlRiuO4ENr...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/80/1/014503 2016

  25. [25]

    Altmeyer, D

    M. Altmeyer, D. Guterding, P. J. Hirschfeld, T. A. Maier, R. Valentí, D. J. Scalapino, Role of vertex corrections in the matrix formulation of the ran- dom phase approximation for the multiorbital Hubbard model, Phy. Rev. B 94 (2016) 214515.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214515. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214515

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.214515 2016

  26. [26]

    Ozaki, Continued fraction representation of the fermi-dirac function for large-scale electronic structure calculations, Phys

    T. Ozaki, Continued fraction representation of the fermi-dirac function for large-scale electronic structure calculations, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 035123. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.035123. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.035123 18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.035123 2007

  27. [27]

    L. V . Boehnke, Susceptibilities in materials with multiple strongly correlated orbitals, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg, dissertation, oral defence: 2014- 10-28 (2015). URLhttps://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/6373

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    M. R. Cantarino, K. R. Pakuszewski, B. Salzmann, P. H. A. Moya, W. R. d. S. Neto, G. S. Freitas, P. G. Pagliuso, W. H. Brito, C. Monney, C. Adriano, F. A. Garcia, Incoherent electronic band states in mn-substituted bafe 2as2, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 245124.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.245124. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.245124

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.245124 2023

  29. [29]

    Heavy operators and hydrodynamic tails

    M. dos Reis Cantarino, K. R. Pakuszewski, B. Salzmann, P. H. A. Moya, W. R. da Silva Neto, G. S. Freitas, P. G. Pagliuso, C. Adriano, W. H. Brito, F. A. Garcia, Hole doping and electronic correlations in Cr substituted BaFe2As2, SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 141.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys. 17.5.141. URLhttps://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.5.141

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys 2024

  30. [30]

    X. Chen, J. Qi, D. Shi, Strain-engineering of magnetic coupling in two- dimensional magnetic semiconductor crsite 3: Competition of direct ex- change interaction and superexchange interaction, Phys. Lett. A 379 (2015) 60–63.doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.10.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.10.042 2015

  31. [31]

    Y . Lou, D. Wu, Y . Liao, C. Fang, Y . Pu, J. Xie, A in-plane biaxial strain tunable electronic structures and magnetic properties of fe2c monolayer, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 563 (2022) 169959.doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022. 169959

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022 2022

  32. [32]

    Bascones, B

    E. Bascones, B. Valenzuela, M. J. Calderón, Orbital differentiation and the role of orbital ordering in the magnetic state of fe superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) 174508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.174508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.174508 2012

  33. [33]

    Nayak, K

    J. Nayak, K. Filsinger, G. H. Fecher, S. Chadov, J. Minár, E. D. L. Rienks, B. Büchner, S. P. Parkin, J. Fink, C. Felser, Observation of a remarkable reduction of correlation effects in bacr2as2 by arpes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 (47) (2017) 12425–12429.doi:10.1073/pnas.1702234114

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1702234114 2017

  34. [34]

    Richard, A

    P. Richard, A. van Roekeghem, B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, J.-P. Hu, A. S. Sefat, S. Biermann, H. Ding, IsBaCr 2As2 symmetrical to 19 BaFe2As2 with respect to half 3dshell filling?, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 184516.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.184516 2017

  35. [35]

    A. G. de Figueiredo, M. R. Cantarino, W. R. da Silva Neto, K. R. Pakuszewski, R. Grossi, D. S. Christovam, J. C. Souza, M. M. Piva, G. S. Freitas, P. G. Pagliuso, C. Adriano, F. A. Garcia, Orbital localization and the role of the fe and as 4porbitals in bafe 2as2 probed by xanes, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 045130.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045130. URLhttps://l...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.045130 2022

  36. [36]

    A. F. Wang, J. J. Lin, P. Cheng, G. J. Ye, F. Chen, J. Q. Ma, X. F. Lu, B. Lei, X. G. Luo, X. H. Chen, Phase diagram and physical properties of nafe1−xcuxas single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 094516.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.094516

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Y . Song, Z. Yamani, C. Cao, Y . Li, C. Zhang, J. S. Chen, Q. Huang, H. Wu, J. Tao, Y . Zhu, W. Tian, S. Chi, H. Cao, Y .-B. Huang, M. Dantz, T. Schmitt, R. Yu, A. H. Nevidomskyy, E. Morosan, Q. Si, P. Dai, A Mott insulator continuously connected to iron pnictide superconductors, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016).doi:10.1038/ncomms13879. 20

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13879 2016