pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17953 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-25 · 🌀 gr-qc

QPO-Based Bayesian Constraints on Charged Particle Dynamics Around Magnetized Schwarzschild Black Holes

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasi-periodic oscillationsblack hole dynamicsmagnetic fieldscharged particlesBayesian parameter estimationepicyclic frequenciesSchwarzschild black holes
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Bayesian analysis of QPO data constrains black hole masses and magnetic field strengths via charged particle dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how charged particles with magnetic dipole moments move around a Schwarzschild black hole in a paraboloidal magnetic field. The authors derive the motion using the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism and calculate the frequencies of small oscillations around circular orbits. They incorporate these frequencies into the relativistic precession model to interpret high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations observed in black hole systems. By applying Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods to fit observational data from black holes of varying masses, the study places constraints on the black hole mass, the magnetic field strength and geometry, the coupling strength between the particle's magnetic moment and the field, and the orbital radius where the oscillations occur.

Core claim

The magnetic field strength and the coupling parameter exert opposing influences on the stability of circular orbits and on the epicyclic frequencies, enabling the use of QPO observations to derive parameter bounds through Bayesian inference for stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black holes.

What carries the argument

The dipole coupling interaction in the Hamiltonian, which accounts for the particle's magnetic moment interacting with the external magnetic field and alters the effective potential governing orbital and epicyclic motion.

If this is right

  • Constraints on magnetic field strength are obtained consistently across black hole mass scales using the same model.
  • The geometry of the magnetic field is fixed to paraboloidal in the fits.
  • The QPO orbital radius is determined as a free parameter in the estimation.
  • Competing effects of field strength and coupling must be accounted for to explain observed frequencies.
  • Magnetospheric effects influence the timing signals from accreting black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar modeling could be applied to other compact objects where magnetic fields play a role in particle dynamics.
  • Higher resolution QPO data could distinguish between different field geometries.
  • Ignoring magnetic dipole effects might lead to systematic errors in mass determinations from QPO modeling.
  • The framework opens a path to probe black hole magnetospheres using timing observations.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen form of the dipole coupling is taken to represent the primary way the magnetosphere affects the epicyclic frequencies.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the predicted and observed frequency ratios in a black hole system with independently measured mass and magnetic field would falsify the applicability of this dipole coupling model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17953 by Hasan El Moumni, Karima Masmar, Zakaria. Ahal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Effective potential as a function of the external magnetic field strength B and the coupling parameter β, for fixed values r = 6 and L ′ = 6. The parameters B and β exhibit opposite qualitative effects: increasing B lowers the potential, whereas increasing β raises it. For fixed orbital radius and angular momentum in the equatorial plane, the two parameters influence the potential in opposite directions: a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radial dependence of the specific angular momentum L ′ for circular orbits of charged magnetized particles for different values of the magnetic field strength B and coupling parameter β [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ISCO radius rISCO as a function of the magnetic field strength B for different values of the coupling parameter β. inner radius of the accretion disk, whereas negative values draw the ISCO closer to the event horizon. At the ISCO, the particle possesses well-defined values of specific energy and angular mo￾mentum. Fig.4 shows the dependence of the specific energy on the angular momentum for different value… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Specific energy E′ as a function of the specific angular momentum L ′ for different values of the coupling parameter β and magnetic field strength B. tractive (repulsive) Lorentz force. The inclusion of a magnetic dipole moment significantly modifies this picture. Representative particle trajectories for weak and strong magnetic fields are displayed in Fig.5 for different values of β. In the weak magnetic … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trajectories of charged magnetized particles around a magnetized black hole for different magnetic field strengths and coupling parameters. The black disk represents the black hole, while gray curves denote magnetic field lines. Within this model, the radiation emitted by the disk is primarily generated near its inner edge, close to the ISCO, where relativistic effects and magnetic interactions are stronge… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radiating flux of accretion disk within panel (a) and Temperature of the disk in panel (b) against B′ and β in a fixed r = 10 . Fig.6 displays the dependence of the radiative flux and temperature on the magnetic field strength B and the coupling parameter β at a fixed radius r = 10. Negative values of B enhance both the flux and temperature, while increasing β suppresses them. These trends reflect the comp… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Density plot of the temperature profile of the accretion disk around the black hole for different parabolic MF strengths B and coupling parameters β. The differential luminosity observed at infinity is given by dL∞ d ln r = 4πr√ g E′ F(r), (33) which directly reflects the radial distribution of emitted radiation. Assuming blackbody radiation, the spectral luminosity measured at infinity reads νLν,∞ = 60 π … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Differential luminosity of accretion disk within different strength of B and β. In the following section, we therefore investigate the epicyclic dynamics of magnetized charged particles in a parabolic black hole magnetosphere and analyze the resulting QPO frequencies. 3.4 Fundamental frequencies The dynamics of particles orbiting a black hole is strongly governed by the properties of circular orbits, in pa… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial profiles of Keplerian frequencies for a charged particle with dipole moment orbiting a mag￾netized BH within different strengths of B and β. magnetic field strengths (B ≥ 0), while dashed curves represent negative values (B < 0). The Keplerian frequency decreases with increasing magnetic field strength. The coupling parameter β produces a qualitatively similar effect, although its influence is gener… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Radial dependence of the radial frequency for a charged particle with dipole moment orbiting a magnetized BH within different strengths of B and β. This figure reveals that for non-negative magnetic field strengths (B ≥ 0), the radial epicyclic frequency Ωr is reduced, whereas it is enhanced for B < 0. Likewise, negative values of the coupling parameter β increase Ωr, while positive values lead to its sup… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Upper and lower QPO frequency correlation predicted by the relativistic precession model for different values of the magnetic field strength B and coupling parameter β. This figure shows that the characteristic frequencies shift systematically under the combined influence of the black hole magnetic field strength and the dipole–field coupling parameter, while preserving the typical 3 : 2 frequency ratio. … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Constraints on magnetized BH parameters of the QPO orbit from a five-dimensional MCMC analysis using the QPO data for the stellar mass BHs GRS 1915+105 ,GRO J1655-40 and XTE J1550-564 , intermediate-mass BH M82 X-1 and supermassive BH Sgr A⋆ and in the RP model. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Parameter correlation matrices derived from the MCMC posterior samples for the analyzed black hole sources, illustrating the level of degeneracy among the parameters (M, B, r/M, β, w). A strong anti-correlation between the black hole mass M and the orbital radius r is observed for several sources (e.g. ρ ≃ −0.96 for GRO J1655–40 and ρ ≃ −0.99 for M82 X–1). Such a behavior is expected in QPO models since t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the motion of charged particles with a magnetic dipole moment orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an external paraboloidal magnetic field. The interaction between the particle's intrinsic magnetic moment and the black hole magnetosphere is modeled through a dipole coupling, and the equations of motion are derived using the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism. We analyze equatorial circular orbits, the innermost stable circular orbit, and epicyclic oscillations, showing that the magnetic field strength and coupling parameter produce competing effects on orbital stability and fundamental frequencies. These frequencies are applied to model high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations within the relativistic precession framework. Using observational QPO data from stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black holes, we perform a Bayesian parameter estimation based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. The analysis constrains the black hole mass, magnetic field strength, field geometry, coupling parameter, and QPO orbital radius, highlighting the role of magnetospheric interactions in shaping both particle dynamics and timing properties of accreting black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the motion of charged particles possessing a magnetic dipole moment in the spacetime of a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an external paraboloidal magnetic field. Equations of motion are obtained via the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism; equatorial circular orbits, the ISCO, and epicyclic frequencies are analyzed, with the magnetic field strength and a dipole-coupling parameter shown to exert competing influences. These frequencies are inserted into the relativistic precession model for high-frequency QPOs. Observational QPO data from stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black holes are then used in an MCMC Bayesian analysis to constrain black-hole mass, magnetic-field strength, field geometry, coupling parameter, and orbital radius.

Significance. If the central modeling assumption is validated, the work supplies a concrete route to joint constraints on magnetospheric parameters and black-hole mass across three decades in mass scale, using only timing data. The explicit inclusion of a particle dipole moment and the paraboloidal field geometry distinguishes the approach from purely geodesic or test-particle treatments and could be tested against future multi-messenger observations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of effective potential and epicyclic frequencies] The functional form of the dipole-coupling term in the Hamilton-Jacobi effective potential is introduced without quantitative comparison to alternative contributions (higher multipoles, possible plasma back-reaction, or frame-dragging if spin were restored). Because the epicyclic frequencies that enter the MCMC likelihood are computed directly from this term, any incompleteness propagates directly into the reported posteriors on B, coupling parameter, and mass. A concrete test—e.g., recomputing frequencies with an added quadrupole term and showing that the shift remains sub-dominant over the quoted parameter ranges—would be required to support the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'field geometry' is constrained, yet the precise parameterization (e.g., the opening angle or radial index of the paraboloidal field) is not defined until later; an early equation or table listing all free parameters would improve readability.
  2. [Bayesian analysis] No error budget or convergence diagnostics for the MCMC chains are mentioned in the provided text; inclusion of Gelman-Rubin statistics or posterior predictive checks would strengthen the Bayesian section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested validation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The functional form of the dipole-coupling term in the Hamilton-Jacobi effective potential is introduced without quantitative comparison to alternative contributions (higher multipoles, possible plasma back-reaction, or frame-dragging if spin were restored). Because the epicyclic frequencies that enter the MCMC likelihood are computed directly from this term, any incompleteness propagates directly into the reported posteriors on B, coupling parameter, and mass. A concrete test—e.g., recomputing frequencies with an added quadrupole term and showing that the shift remains sub-dominant over the quoted parameter ranges—would be required to support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of neglected contributions strengthens the robustness of the reported posteriors. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.3) that introduces a perturbative quadrupole correction to the paraboloidal magnetic field, recomputes the effective potential and epicyclic frequencies, and demonstrates that the resulting shifts remain sub-dominant (well below observational uncertainties) over the full range of magnetic-field strengths and coupling parameters constrained by the data. This test directly supports the use of the dipole term in the MCMC analysis. Plasma back-reaction and frame-dragging effects lie outside the present vacuum, non-rotating framework and are identified as topics for future extensions rather than part of the current scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives equations of motion from the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism for a charged particle with magnetic dipole moment in an external paraboloidal magnetic field around a Schwarzschild black hole. Equatorial circular orbits, ISCO, and epicyclic frequencies are computed directly from this model. These frequencies are inserted into the relativistic precession framework to model QPOs, after which Bayesian MCMC is applied to external observational QPO data to constrain parameters. No prediction or central result reduces by construction to the inputs or to a fitted parameter renamed as output. The dipole coupling is stated as an explicit modeling assumption rather than derived from the data. No self-citations are load-bearing in the provided derivation chain. The procedure is a standard first-principles model plus external-data inference and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the dipole-coupling interaction term (invented for this model) and on several fitted parameters whose values are determined by matching to QPO data rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (3)
  • magnetic field strength
    Constrained via MCMC fit to observed QPO frequencies
  • coupling parameter
    Fitted parameter controlling strength of magnetic-moment interaction
  • field geometry parameter
    Controls paraboloidal shape and is adjusted to data
axioms (2)
  • standard math Hamilton-Jacobi formalism yields the correct equations of motion in the combined gravitational plus magnetic background
    Invoked to derive orbital frequencies
  • domain assumption Relativistic precession model correctly maps epicyclic frequencies to observed QPO peaks
    Used without additional justification in the abstract
invented entities (1)
  • dipole coupling term no independent evidence
    purpose: Models interaction between particle magnetic moment and external field
    Introduced ad hoc to capture magnetospheric effects; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5479 in / 1545 out tokens · 28131 ms · 2026-05-16T10:47:11.803108+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring. Astrophys. J. Lett., 910(1):L12, 2021

  2. [2]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring. Astrophys. J. Lett., 964(2):L25, 2024

  3. [3]

    Magnetic fields in astrophysical objects

    LJ Silvers. Magnetic fields in astrophysical objects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1884):4453–4464, 2008

  4. [4]

    Magnetic fields in galaxies

    Richard Wielebinski and F Krause. Magnetic fields in galaxies. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 4(4):449–485, 1993

  5. [5]

    Pulsar electrodynamics

    Peter Goldreich and William H Julian. Pulsar electrodynamics. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 157, p. 869, 157:869, 1969

  6. [6]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from kerr black holes

    Roger D Blandford and Roman L Znajek. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from kerr black holes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 179(3):433–456, 1977

  7. [7]

    Magnetic fields in spiral galaxies

    Rainer Beck. Magnetic fields in spiral galaxies. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 24(1):4, 2016

  8. [8]

    Theory of star formation

    Christopher F McKee and Eve C Ostriker. Theory of star formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 45(1):565–687, 2007

  9. [9]

    Magnetic fields in molecular clouds

    Richard M Crutcher. Magnetic fields in molecular clouds. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 50(1):29–63, 2012

  10. [10]

    Acceleration of ultra high energy cosmic rays

    RD Blandford. Acceleration of ultra high energy cosmic rays. Physica Scripta, 2000(T85):191, 2000

  11. [11]

    On the acceleration of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays

    Federico Fraschetti. On the acceleration of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1884):4417–4428, 2008

  12. [12]

    Supermassive black holes as possible sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays

    Arman Tursunov, Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık, Martin Koloˇ s, Naresh Dadhich, and Bobomurat Ahme- dov. Supermassive black holes as possible sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays. The Astrophysical Journal, 895(1):14, 2020. 25

  13. [13]

    Extraction of black hole rotational energy by a magnetic field and the formation of relativistic jets

    Shinji Koide, Kazunari Shibata, Takahiro Kudoh, and David L Meier. Extraction of black hole rotational energy by a magnetic field and the formation of relativistic jets. Science, 295(5560):1688–1691, 2002

  14. [14]

    A strong magnetic field in the jet base of a supermassive black hole

    Ivan Marti-Vidal, Sebastien Muller, Wouter Vlemmings, Cathy Horellou, and Susanne Aalto. A strong magnetic field in the jet base of a supermassive black hole. Science, 348(6232):311–314, 2015

  15. [15]

    Magnetized particle motion and acceleration around a schwarzschild black hole in a magnetic field

    Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Ozodbek Rahimov, and Umar Sa- likhbaev. Magnetized particle motion and acceleration around a schwarzschild black hole in a magnetic field. Physica Scripta, 89(8):084008, 2014

  16. [16]

    Particle acceleration and plasma heating in the chromo- sphere

    VV Zaitsev and AV Stepanov. Particle acceleration and plasma heating in the chromo- sphere. Solar Physics, 290(12):3559–3572, 2015

  17. [17]

    Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    Dieter Biskamp. Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Cambridge University Press, 2003

  18. [18]

    Magnetic reconnection

    Masaaki Yamada, Russell Kulsrud, and Hantao Ji. Magnetic reconnection. Reviews of modern physics, 82(1):603–664, 2010

  19. [19]

    Black hole spin and accretion disk magnetic field strength estimates for more than 750 active galactic nuclei and multiple galactic black holes

    Ruth A Daly. Black hole spin and accretion disk magnetic field strength estimates for more than 750 active galactic nuclei and multiple galactic black holes. The Astrophysical Journal, 886(1):37, 2019

  20. [20]

    A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the galaxy

    RP Eatough, H Falcke, R Karuppusamy, KJ Lee, DJ Champion, EF Keane, G Desvignes, DHFM Schnitzeler, LG Spitler, M Kramer, et al. A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the galaxy. Nature, 501(7467):391–394, 2013

  21. [21]

    First m87 event horizon telescope results

    Kazunori Akiyama, Juan Carlos Algaba, Antxon Alberdi, Walter Alef, Richard Anantua, Keiichi Asada, Rebecca Azulay, Anne-Kathrin Baczko, David Ball, Mislav Balokovi´ c, et al. First m87 event horizon telescope results. viii. magnetic field structure near the event horizon. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 910(1):L13, 2021

  22. [22]

    Charged particle dynamics in parabolic magnetosphere around schwarzschild black hole

    Martin Koloˇ s, Misbah Shahzadi, and Arman Tursunov. Charged particle dynamics in parabolic magnetosphere around schwarzschild black hole. The European Physical Journal C, 83(4):323, 2023

  23. [23]

    Magnetic Fields of Black Holes and the Variability Plane

    M Yu Piotrovich, NA Silant’ev, Yu N Gnedin, and TM Natsvlishvili. Magnetic fields of black holes and the variability plane. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.4948, 2010

  24. [24]

    Askour, A

    N. Askour, A. Belhaj, L. Chakhchi, H. El Moumni, and K. Masmar. On M87∗and SgrA∗ observational constraints of Dunkl black holes. JHEAp, 46:100349, 2025

  25. [25]

    Chakhchi, H

    L. Chakhchi, H. El Moumni, and K. Masmar. Signatures of the accelerating black holes with a cosmological constant from the Sgr A⋆and M87⋆shadow prospects. Phys. Dark Univ., 44:101501, 2024

  26. [26]

    Black hole in a uniform magnetic field

    Robert M Wald. Black hole in a uniform magnetic field. Physical Review D, 10(6):1680, 1974

  27. [27]

    Charged particle motion around schwarzschild black hole with split monopole magnetosphere

    Martin Koloˇ s, Dilshodbek Bardiev, and Bakhtinur Juraev. Charged particle motion around schwarzschild black hole with split monopole magnetosphere. Proceedings of RAGtime, pages 20–21, 2019. 26

  28. [28]

    Charged particles in dipole magneto- sphere of neutron stars: epicyclic oscillations in and off-equatorial plane

    Jaroslav Vrba, Martin Koloˇ s, and Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık. Charged particles in dipole magneto- sphere of neutron stars: epicyclic oscillations in and off-equatorial plane. The European Physical Journal Plus, 140(2):1–25, 2025

  29. [29]

    Charged particle dynamics in magnetosphere generated by current loop around schwarzschild black hole

    Martin Koloˇ s and David Kofroˇ n. Charged particle dynamics in magnetosphere generated by current loop around schwarzschild black hole. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11518, 2025

  30. [30]

    Quasi-harmonic oscillatory motion of charged particles around a schwarzschild black hole immersed in a uniform magnetic field

    Martin Koloˇ s, Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık, and Arman Tursunov. Quasi-harmonic oscillatory motion of charged particles around a schwarzschild black hole immersed in a uniform magnetic field. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(16):165009, 2015

  31. [31]

    Magnetic field of a current loop around a schwarzschild black hole

    Jacobus A Petterson. Magnetic field of a current loop around a schwarzschild black hole. Physical Review D, 10(10):3166, 1974

  32. [32]

    Synthetic gamma-ray light curves of kerr black hole magnetospheric activity from particle-in-cell simulations

    Benjamin Crinquand, Benoˆ ıt Cerutti, Guillaume Dubus, Kyle Parfrey, and Alexander Philippov. Synthetic gamma-ray light curves of kerr black hole magnetospheric activity from particle-in-cell simulations. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 650:A163, 2021

  33. [33]

    Simulations of black hole accretion torus in various magnetic field configurations

    Martin Koloˇ s and Agnieszka Janiuk. Simulations of black hole accretion torus in various magnetic field configurations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07535, 2020

  34. [34]

    Parabolic jets from the spinning black hole in m87

    Masanori Nakamura, Keiichi Asada, Kazuhiro Hada, Hung-Yi Pu, Scott Noble, Chihyin Tseng, Kenji Toma, Motoki Kino, Hiroshi Nagai, Kazuya Takahashi, et al. Parabolic jets from the spinning black hole in m87. The Astrophysical Journal, 868(2):146, 2018

  35. [35]

    The event horizon general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic code comparison project

    Oliver Porth, Koushik Chatterjee, Ramesh Narayan, Charles F Gammie, Yosuke Mizuno, Peter Anninos, John G Baker, Matteo Bugli, Chi-kwan Chan, Jordy Davelaar, et al. The event horizon general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic code comparison project. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 243(2):26, 2019

  36. [36]

    Curled orbit and epicyclic oscillation of charged particles around the weakly magnetized black hole in the presence of lorentz violation

    Hai-Yang Zhang, Ya-Peng Hu, and Yu-Sen An. Curled orbit and epicyclic oscillation of charged particles around the weakly magnetized black hole in the presence of lorentz violation. The European Physical Journal C, 85(7):725, 2025

  37. [37]

    Epicyclic oscillations in spinning particle motion around kerr black hole applied in models fitting the quasi- periodic oscillations observed in microquasars and agns

    Misbah Shahzadi, Martin Koloˇ s, Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık, and Yousaf Habib. Epicyclic oscillations in spinning particle motion around kerr black hole applied in models fitting the quasi- periodic oscillations observed in microquasars and agns. The European Physical Journal C, 81(12):1067, 2021

  38. [38]

    Circular motion and qpos near black holes in kalb–ramond gravity

    Shokhzod Jumaniyozov, Saeed Ullah Khan, Javlon Rayimbaev, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Sharofiddin Urinbaev, and Sardor Murodov. Circular motion and qpos near black holes in kalb–ramond gravity. The European Physical Journal C, 84(9):964, 2024

  39. [39]

    Perturbing the stable accretion disk in kerr and 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet gravities: Comprehensive analysis of instabilities and dynamics

    Orhan Donmez. Perturbing the stable accretion disk in kerr and 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet gravities: Comprehensive analysis of instabilities and dynamics. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24(8):085001, 2024

  40. [40]

    Proposing a physical mechanism to explain various observed sources of qpos by simulating the dynamics of accretion disks around the black holes

    Orhan Donmez. Proposing a physical mechanism to explain various observed sources of qpos by simulating the dynamics of accretion disks around the black holes. The European Physical Journal C, 84(5):524, 2024

  41. [41]

    The comparison of alternative spacetimes using the spherical accretion around the black hole

    Orhan Donmez. The comparison of alternative spacetimes using the spherical accretion around the black hole. Modern Physics Letters A, 39(16):2450076, 2024. 27

  42. [42]

    Qpos from charged particles around charged black holes in stvg

    Isomiddin Nishonov, Sardor Murodov, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Saeed Ullah Khan, Javlon Rayimbaev, Inomjon Ibragimov, and Sardor Sabirov. Qpos from charged particles around charged black holes in stvg. The European Physical Journal C, 85(9):1029, 2025

  43. [43]

    X-ray properties of black-hole binaries

    Ronald A Remillard and Jeffrey E McClintock. X-ray properties of black-hole binaries. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 44(1):49–92, 2006

  44. [44]

    Radio pulsars in an electromagnetic universe

    Javlon Rayimbaev, Shokhzod Jumaniyozov, Maksud Umaraliyev, and Ahmadjon Abdu- jabbarov. Radio pulsars in an electromagnetic universe. Universe, 8(10):496, 2022

  45. [45]

    A precise determination of black hole spin in gro j1655-40

    Marek Artur Abramowicz and W Klu´ zniak. A precise determination of black hole spin in gro j1655-40. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 374(3):L19–L20, 2001

  46. [46]

    Black holes surrounded by pfdm in kalb-ramond gravity: from thermodynamics to qpo tests

    Shokhzod Jumaniyozov, Sardor Murodov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Inomjon Ibragimov, Bekzod Madaminov, Sharofiddin Urinbaev, and Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov. Black holes surrounded by pfdm in kalb-ramond gravity: from thermodynamics to qpo tests. The European Physical Journal C, 85(7):797, 2025

  47. [47]

    P-mode observations on cen a

    Francois Bouchy and Fabien Carrier. P-mode observations on cen a. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 374(1):L5–L8, 2001

  48. [48]

    Qpos analyses and circular orbits of charged particles around magnetized black holes in bertotti– robinson geometry

    Abubakir Shermatov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Bekir Can L¨ utf¨ uolu, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Sabirov Sardor, Inomjon Ibragimov, Murodbek Vapayev, and Bahrom Kuyliev. Qpos analyses and circular orbits of charged particles around magnetized black holes in bertotti– robinson geometry. The European Physical Journal C, 85(9):1017, 2025

  49. [49]

    Disc–jet coupling in black hole accretion systems–i

    Jonathan C McKinney and Ramesh Narayan. Disc–jet coupling in black hole accretion systems–i. general relativistic magnetohydrodynamical models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 375(2):513–530, 2007

  50. [50]

    Black hole spin and the radio loud/quiet dichotomy of active galactic nuclei

    Alexander Tchekhovskoy, Ramesh Narayan, and Jonathan C McKinney. Black hole spin and the radio loud/quiet dichotomy of active galactic nuclei. The Astrophysical Journal, 711(1):50, 2010

  51. [51]

    Collisions and dynamics of particles with magnetic dipole moment and electric charge near magnetized rotating kerr black holes

    Shokhzod Jumaniyozov, Saeed Ullah Khan, Javlon Rayimbaev, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Bobomurat Ahmedov. Collisions and dynamics of particles with magnetic dipole moment and electric charge near magnetized rotating kerr black holes. The European Physical Journal C, 84(3):291, 2024

  52. [52]

    General relativistic dynamics of polarized particles in electromagnetic fields

    Giovanni Preti. General relativistic dynamics of polarized particles in electromagnetic fields. Physical Review D, 70(2):024012, 2004

  53. [53]

    Spinning test particles in general relativity

    Achille Papapetrou. Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 209:248–258, 1951

  54. [54]

    Dy- namics of particles with electric charge and magnetic dipole moment near schwarzschild- mog black hole

    Sardor Murodov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Abdullo Hakimov. Dy- namics of particles with electric charge and magnetic dipole moment near schwarzschild- mog black hole. Symmetry, 15(11):2084, 2023

  55. [55]

    Particles with magnetic dipole moment orbiting magnetized schwarzschild black holes: Applications to orbits of hot-spots around sgr a

    Javlon Rayimbaev, Bobomurat Ahmedov, and Zdenek Stuchlik. Particles with magnetic dipole moment orbiting magnetized schwarzschild black holes: Applications to orbits of hot-spots around sgr a. Physics of the Dark Universe, 45:101516, 2024. 28

  56. [56]

    Dynamics of charged particles and magnetic dipoles around magnetized quasi-schwarzschild black holes

    Bakhtiyor Narzilloev, Javlon Rayimbaev, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Bobomurat Ahme- dov, and Cosimo Bambi. Dynamics of charged particles and magnetic dipoles around magnetized quasi-schwarzschild black holes. The European Physical Journal C, 81(3):269, 2021

  57. [57]

    Magnetized black holes: ionized keplerian disks and acceleration of ultra-high energy particles

    Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık, Martin Koloˇ s, and Arman Tursunov. Magnetized black holes: ionized keplerian disks and acceleration of ultra-high energy particles. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 17(1):13, 2019

  58. [58]

    Black hole flares: ejection of accreted magnetic flux through 3d plasmoid-mediated reconnection

    Bart Ripperda, Matthew Liska, Koushik Chatterjee, Gibwa Musoke, Alexander A Philip- pov, Sera B Markoff, Alexander Tchekhovskoy, and Ziri Younsi. Black hole flares: ejection of accreted magnetic flux through 3d plasmoid-mediated reconnection. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 924(2):L32, 2022

  59. [59]

    Correlations in the quasi-periodic oscillation frequencies of low-mass x-ray binaries and the relativistic precession model

    Luigi Stella, Mario Vietri, and Sharon M Morsink. Correlations in the quasi-periodic oscillation frequencies of low-mass x-ray binaries and the relativistic precession model. The Astrophysical Journal, 524(1):L63, 1999

  60. [60]

    The orbital reso- nance model for twin peak khz quasi periodic oscillations in microquasars

    Gabriel T¨ or¨ ok, Marek A Abramowicz, W Klu´ zniak, and Z Stuchl´ ık. The orbital reso- nance model for twin peak khz quasi periodic oscillations in microquasars. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 436(1):1–8, 2005

  61. [61]

    The orbital resonance model for twin peak kHz QPOs

    Marek A Abramowicz, Wlodek Kluzniak, Zdenek Stuchlik, and Gabriel Torok. The orbital resonance model for twin peak khz qpos. arXiv preprint astro-ph/0401464, 2004

  62. [62]

    Confrontation of observation and theory: high-frequency qpos in x-ray binaries, tidal disruption events, and active galactic nuclei

    Krista Lynne Smith, Celia R Tandon, and Robert V Wagoner. Confrontation of observation and theory: high-frequency qpos in x-ray binaries, tidal disruption events, and active galactic nuclei. The Astrophysical Journal, 906(2):92, 2021

  63. [63]

    Dynamics of warped accretion discs

    Scott Tremaine and Shane W Davis. Dynamics of warped accretion discs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441(2):1408–1434, 2014

  64. [64]

    Modeling hf-qpos in microquasars and agns: charged particles around black holes with cdm halos

    Zakaria Ahal, H El Moumni, and Karima Masmar. Modeling hf-qpos in microquasars and agns: charged particles around black holes with cdm halos. The European Physical Journal C, 85(10):1–36, 2025

  65. [65]

    Signatures of ned on quasi periodic oscillations of a magnetically charged black hole.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07821, 2025

    Bidyut Hazarika, Mrinnoy M Gohain, and Prabwal Phukon. Signatures of ned on quasi periodic oscillations of a magnetically charged black hole.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07821, 2025

  66. [66]

    A Precise determination of angular momentum in the black hole candidate GRO J1655-40

    Marek Artur Abramowicz and Wlodek Kluzniak. A Precise determination of angular momentum in the black hole candidate GRO J1655-40. Astron. Astrophys., 374:L19, 2001

  67. [67]

    S. E. Motta, T. Mu˜ noz Darias, A. Sanna, R. Fender, T. Belloni, and L. Stella. Black hole spin measurements through the relativistic precession model: XTE J1550-564. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 439:65, 2014

  68. [68]

    Ev- idence for harmonic relationships in the high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations of xte j1550–564 and gro j1655–40

    Ronald A Remillard, Michael P Muno, Jeffrey E McClintock, and Jerome A Orosz. Ev- idence for harmonic relationships in the high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations of xte j1550–564 and gro j1655–40. The Astrophysical Journal, 580(2):1030, 2002

  69. [69]

    Rxte observations of qpos in the black hole candidate grs 1915+ 105

    EH Morgan, RA Remillard, and J Greiner. Rxte observations of qpos in the black hole candidate grs 1915+ 105. The Astrophysical Journal, 482(2):993, 1997. 29

  70. [70]

    Discovery of a 450 hz quasi-periodic oscillation from the microquasar gro j1655–40 with the rossi x-ray timing explorer

    Tod E Strohmayer. Discovery of a 450 hz quasi-periodic oscillation from the microquasar gro j1655–40 with the rossi x-ray timing explorer. The Astrophysical Journal, 552(1):L49, 2001

  71. [71]

    Black hole quasi-periodic oscillations in the presence of gauss-bonnet trace anomaly

    Rupam Jyoti Borah and Umananda Dev Goswami. Black hole quasi-periodic oscillations in the presence of gauss-bonnet trace anomaly. Physics Letters B, page 140124, 2025

  72. [72]

    The neutron star interior composition explorer (nicer): design and development

    Keith C Gendreau, Zaven Arzoumanian, Phillip W Adkins, Cheryl L Albert, John F Anders, Andrew T Aylward, Charles L Baker, Erin R Balsamo, William A Bamford, Suyog S Benegalrao, et al. The neutron star interior composition explorer (nicer): design and development. In Space telescopes and instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to gamma ray, volume 9905, pages 42...

  73. [73]

    Fourier techniques in x-ray timing

    M Van der Klis. Fourier techniques in x-ray timing. In Timing neutron stars, pages 27–69. Springer, 1989

  74. [74]

    Is m82 x-1 really an intermediate-mass black hole? x-ray spectral and timing evidence

    Ralph Fiorito and Lev Titarchuk. Is m82 x-1 really an intermediate-mass black hole? x-ray spectral and timing evidence. The Astrophysical Journal, 614(2):L113, 2004

  75. [75]

    Mass of intermediate black hole in the source m82 x-1 restricted by models of twin high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations

    Zdenˇ ek Stuchl´ ık and Martin Koloˇ s. Mass of intermediate black hole in the source m82 x-1 restricted by models of twin high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 451(3):2575–2588, 2015

  76. [76]

    emcee: the mcmc hammer

    Daniel Foreman-Mackey, David W Hogg, Dustin Lang, and Jonathan Goodman. emcee: the mcmc hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925):306, 2013. 30