arxiv: 2601.18433 · v4 · submitted 2026-01-26 · 🧮 math-ph · math.GR· math.MP· math.RT

Massless Representations in Conformal Space and Their de Sitter Restrictions

Jean-Pierre Gazeau , Hamed Pejhan , Ivan Todorov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.GRmath.MPmath.RT

keywords massless representationsconformal groupde Sitter groupClifford algebraoctonionsMajorana spinorsladder representationsinvariant bilinear forms

0 comments

The pith

Massless representations of the conformal group U(2,2) restrict to de Sitter via a Clifford-split-octonion algebra realizing 8-component Majorana spinors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs massless ladder representations of the conformal group U(2,2) and examines their restrictions to the de Sitter group Sp(2,2). It supplies explicit derivations of invariant bilinear forms, Casimir operators, vertex operators, and two-point functions for low-helicity fields. The central advance is a canonical Clifford-split-octonion framework that places 8-component Majorana spinors inside an alternative composition algebra. This supplies a unified algebraic setting for the spinorial and geometric structures needed in the theory. A reader would care because the construction aims to deliver concrete computational control over symmetries that appear in quantum field theory and cosmology.

Core claim

The monograph establishes that massless representations of U(2,2) and their Sp(2,2) restrictions admit a coherent treatment through the introduction of a canonical Clifford-split-octonion framework. In this setting 8-component Majorana spinors are realized within an alternative composition algebra, which furnishes an intrinsically defined unification of the algebraic, spinorial, and geometric ingredients. The framework supports the systematic derivation of invariant bilinear forms and Casimir operators together with explicit constructions of vertex operators and two-point functions for low-helicity fields.

What carries the argument

The canonical Clifford-split-octonion framework, an alternative composition algebra that realizes 8-component Majorana spinors to unify algebraic, spinorial, and geometric structures for the representations.

If this is right

Invariant bilinear forms and Casimir operators become explicitly computable for the ladder representations.
Vertex operators and two-point functions for low-helicity fields can be constructed directly inside the algebra.
The representations restrict to the de Sitter group Sp(2,2) while preserving the algebraic structure.
The same setting yields a unified treatment of symmetries relevant to quantum field theory and cosmology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The framework could simplify explicit calculations of correlation functions in de Sitter backgrounds.
It may extend naturally to higher-spin or supersymmetric extensions of the same symmetry groups.
Connections between the split-octonion realization and other composition-algebra approaches in particle physics become testable through direct comparison of invariant operators.

Load-bearing premise

The Clifford-split-octonion framework supplies a consistent realization of the massless representations that stays free of inconsistencies when the derived invariant forms and operators are used in physical models.

What would settle it

A concrete inconsistency or contradiction appearing when the invariant bilinear forms and Casimir operators obtained from the Clifford-split-octonion construction are applied to an explicit physical model of a low-helicity massless field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.18433 by Hamed Pejhan, Ivan Todorov, Jean-Pierre Gazeau.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 1.** Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The monograph offers a coherent and self-contained treatment of massless (ladder) representations of the conformal group U(2,2) and their restriction to the de Sitter group Sp(2,2), combining rigorous representation-theoretic analysis with fully explicit constructions. It systematically develops these representations, including the derivation of invariant bilinear forms and Casimir operators, and constructs vertex operators and two-point functions for low-helicity fields. A central and distinctive contribution is the introduction of a canonical Clifford-split-octonion framework, in which 8-component Majorana spinors are realized within an alternative composition algebra, providing a unified and intrinsically defined setting for the algebraic, spinorial, and geometric structures underlying the theory. By bridging abstract symmetry principles with concrete computational methods and physically motivated applications in quantum field theory and cosmology, the monograph advances both conceptual clarity and technical control. While primarily addressed to researchers in mathematical physics and related fields, the exposition is carefully structured to guide advanced graduate students through subtle constructions, maintaining accessibility without compromising mathematical precision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The split-octonion framework for Majorana spinors is the real novelty here, but the bilinear forms need explicit checks for non-degeneracy after de Sitter restriction.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is a canonical Clifford-split-octonion realization of the 8-component Majorana spinors that ties together the massless ladder representations of U(2,2) and their Sp(2,2) restrictions. It gives explicit constructions for the invariant bilinear forms, Casimir operators, vertex operators, and two-point functions for low-helicity fields, all in one self-contained treatment. That level of concreteness is useful if you want to move from abstract group theory to actual calculations in conformal or de Sitter models. The algebraic unification looks cleaner than standard matrix realizations of these groups, and the monograph structure makes the derivations accessible without skipping steps. The authors build on standard representation theory rather than inventing new entities, which keeps the circularity low. The constructions appear systematic and the abstract claims they are fully explicit, so the technical control is there for readers who need the formulas. On the downside, split-octonions are non-associative with zero divisors, so the invariant forms could lose rank or the operators could become ill-defined on the restricted modules. The stress-test concern about degeneracy after restriction is worth checking directly in the text; if the paper only states the forms without verifying positive-definiteness or unitarity on the ladder reps, that would limit the physical reach. No free parameters or fitted results show up, which is a plus. This is for mathematical physicists already working on conformal symmetries or de Sitter cosmology who need the explicit spinor algebra. Advanced students with representation-theory background can use it as a reference. It deserves a serious referee because the explicit constructions and new algebraic setting are substantive enough to warrant external verification, even if some consistency details need tightening. Send it to review and ask the referees to confirm the forms remain non-degenerate on the restricted representations.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops massless (ladder) representations of the conformal group U(2,2) and their restrictions to the de Sitter group Sp(2,2). It derives invariant bilinear forms and Casimir operators, constructs vertex operators and two-point functions for low-helicity fields, and introduces a Clifford-split-octonion framework realizing 8-component Majorana spinors as an alternative composition algebra that unifies the algebraic, spinorial, and geometric structures.

Significance. If the explicit constructions hold, the work supplies a parameter-free algebraic setting for these representations that bridges abstract symmetry analysis with concrete computational tools, offering potential utility for QFT applications and cosmology through its unified treatment of spinors and operators.

major comments (1)

[Clifford-split-octonion framework and invariant forms] The central claim that the Clifford-split-octonion framework yields consistent, non-degenerate invariant bilinear forms on the spinor module after Sp(2,2) restriction is load-bearing; the presence of zero divisors and non-associativity in split-octonions raises the possibility that the forms become rank-deficient or that the Casimir operators fail to be well-defined on the ladder representations, and an explicit check of non-degeneracy (e.g., via the explicit matrix realizations or the action on the lowest-weight vectors) is required to support the unified setting.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the split-octonion multiplication table and the embedding of the Majorana spinors should be cross-referenced to the standard basis used in the representation theory sections to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the need to strengthen the verification of non-degeneracy in the Clifford-split-octonion framework. We address the concern directly below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate an explicit check.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the Clifford-split-octonion framework yields consistent, non-degenerate invariant bilinear forms on the spinor module after Sp(2,2) restriction is load-bearing; the presence of zero divisors and non-associativity in split-octonions raises the possibility that the forms become rank-deficient or that the Casimir operators fail to be well-defined on the ladder representations, and an explicit check of non-degeneracy (e.g., via the explicit matrix realizations or the action on the lowest-weight vectors) is required to support the unified setting.

Authors: We agree that an explicit non-degeneracy check is necessary to fully support the central claim. The manuscript constructs the invariant bilinear form on the 8-component Majorana spinor module via the Clifford-split-octonion multiplication and the standard involution, and derives the Casimir operators from the enveloping algebra action. However, the referee is correct that the potential effects of zero divisors and non-associativity on rank after Sp(2,2) restriction were not verified in sufficient detail. We have added a new subsection (Section 4.3) containing the explicit 8x8 matrix realizations of the generators, the bilinear form matrix, and its restriction. Direct computation on the lowest-weight vectors shows that the form remains non-degenerate (full rank 8) and that the Casimirs act as scalars on the ladder representations. The chosen embedding avoids the zero-divisor subalgebra, ensuring consistency. These additions make the unified setting fully rigorous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation builds on independent algebraic construction

full rationale

The paper develops massless ladder representations of U(2,2) and their Sp(2,2) restrictions via explicit constructions of invariant bilinear forms, Casimir operators, vertex operators, and two-point functions. The central Clifford-split-octonion framework is introduced as a new realization of 8-component Majorana spinors within an alternative composition algebra, supplying an independent algebraic setting rather than redefining inputs. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or self-citation chains; the exposition remains self-contained against external representation-theoretic benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard representation theory of the groups U(2,2) and Sp(2,2) together with the newly introduced Clifford-split-octonion algebra; no free parameters are mentioned.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard properties of unitary representations and Casimir operators for the Lie groups U(2,2) and Sp(2,2)
Invoked throughout the development of invariant forms and restrictions.
domain assumption Existence of consistent invariant bilinear forms on the massless representations
Used to construct two-point functions and vertex operators.

invented entities (1)

Clifford-split-octonion framework no independent evidence
purpose: Realize 8-component Majorana spinors inside an alternative composition algebra to unify algebraic, spinorial, and geometric structures
Newly introduced as the canonical setting for the representations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1434 out tokens · 55435 ms · 2026-05-16T11:05:05.279397+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking (D=3 forcing) echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

the spinorial carrier space is fixed from the outset by identifying it with a real 8-dimensional alternative compositional algebra of split-octonions... Clifford generators represented as left-regular multiplication operators by a distinguished set of imaginary split-octonion units
IndisputableMonolith/README.md reality_from_one_distinction (8-tick period) echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

8-component Majorana spinors... split-octonionic structure... 8-tick period implicit in the 8-dimensional algebra

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Infrared Spectral Gap in a Gluonic Dark Sector as the Origin of the Galactic Acceleration Scale
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A trace-anomaly-seeded infrared gap in a coherent gluonic dark sector produces the observed galactic acceleration scale g⋆ = G M_h / r_c² as its gravitational signature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Cartan,Leçons sur la géométrie des espaces de Riemann, Gauthier-Villars (1928)

É. Cartan,Leçons sur la géométrie des espaces de Riemann, Gauthier-Villars (1928)

work page 1928
[2]

Weyl,Gravitation und elektrizität, In Das Relativitätsprinzip: Eine Sammlung von Ab- handlungen (pp

H. Weyl,Gravitation und elektrizität, In Das Relativitätsprinzip: Eine Sammlung von Ab- handlungen (pp. 147-159), Wiesbaden: Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag (1918)

work page 1918
[3]

Wigner,On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, Ann

E.P. Wigner,On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, Ann. Math., 40, 149 (1939)

work page 1939
[4]

T.D.Newton,E.P.Wigner,Localizedstatesforelementaryparticles,Rev.Mod.Phys.,21,400 (1949)

work page 1949
[5]

Bargmann,Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group, Ann

V. Bargmann,Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group, Ann. Math., 48(3), 568-640 (1947)

work page 1947
[6]

Gel’fand,M.A.Naimark,Unitaryrepresentationsof theLorentzgroup, Izv.Akad.Nauk SSSR Ser

I.M. Gel’fand,M.A.Naimark,Unitaryrepresentationsof theLorentzgroup, Izv.Akad.Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 11, 5, 411–504 (1947)

work page 1947
[7]

Segal,A class of operator algebras which are determined by groups, Duke Math

I.E. Segal,A class of operator algebras which are determined by groups, Duke Math. J., 18, 221-265, 1951

work page 1951
[8]

Mackey,Induced Representations of Groups and Quantum Mechanics, J

G.W. Mackey,Induced Representations of Groups and Quantum Mechanics, J. Math. Phys., (1950) — Series of papers developing induced representation theory and applications to massless fields

work page 1950
[9]

I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 185-243 (1953);Representations of semisimple Lie groups

Harish-Chandra,Plancherel formula for the2×2real unimodular group, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 38(4), 337-342 (1952);Representations of a semisimple Lie group on a Banach space. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 185-243 (1953);Representations of semisimple Lie groups. II, Transactions of the American Math- ematical...

work page 1952
[10]

Gel’fand, R.A

I.M. Gel’fand, R.A. Minlos, and Z.Y. Shapiro,Representations of the Rotation and Lorentz Groups and their Applications, Courier Dover Publications (1963)

work page 1963
[11]

G. Mack, A. Salam,Finite-component field representations of the conformal group, Ann. Phys., 53(1), 174-202 (1969)

work page 1969
[12]

Fronsdal,Massless fields with integer spin, Phys

C. Fronsdal,Massless fields with integer spin, Phys. Rev. D, 18(10), 3624 (1978)

work page 1978
[13]

G. Mack, I. Todorov,Irreducibility of the ladder representations of U(2,2)when restricted to the Poincaré subgroup, J. Math. Phys. 10, 2078 (1969)

work page 2078
[14]

Todorov (1933-2025)https://www.ihes.fr/en/todorov-en/?utm

Ivan T. Todorov (1933-2025)https://www.ihes.fr/en/todorov-en/?utm

work page 1933
[15]

IvanTodorov,BiographyandContributions,MuseumoftheBulgarianAcademyofSciences, http://museum.issp.bas.bg/m11-itodorov.html, accessed September 2025

work page 2025
[16]

fr/en/tribute-todorov/, accessed September 2025

IHES,TributetoIvanTodorov,InstitutdesHautesÉtudesScientifiques,https://www.ihes. fr/en/tribute-todorov/, accessed September 2025

work page 2025
[17]

Bogoliubov, A.A

N.N. Bogoliubov, A.A. Logunov, A.I. Oksak, and I. Todorov,General principles of quantum field theory, (Vol. 10), Springer Science and Business Media (2012)

work page 2012
[18]

Bogoliubov, A.A

N.N. Bogoliubov, A.A. Logunov, and I. Todorov,Introduction to axiomatic quantum field theory(1975)

work page 1975
[19]

Dobrev, G

V.K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V.B. Petkova, S.G. Petrova, I. Todorov,Harmonic analysis: on the 𝑛-dimensional Lorentz group and its application to conformal quantum field theory, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1977)

work page 1977
[20]

CERN Courier,Ivan Todorov 1933-2025,https://cerncourier.com/a/ ivan-todorov-1933-2025/, accessed September 2025

work page 1933
[21]

De Sitter,On the relativity of inertia

W. De Sitter,On the relativity of inertia. Remarks concerning Einstein’s latest hypothesis, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Wet., 19.2, 1217 (1917)

work page 1917
[22]

E.P.Wigner,SomeremarksontheinfinitedeSitterspace,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA36,184 (1950)

work page 1950
[23]

Dirac,Wave equations in conformal space, Ann

P.A.M. Dirac,Wave equations in conformal space, Ann. Math., 37, 429-442 (1936). 158 4 Conformal Massless low-helicity Fields and their de Sitter (dS) Spacetime Restriction

work page 1936
[24]

G.Mack,AllunitaryrayrepresentationsoftheconformalgroupSU(2,2)withpositiveenergy, Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 1 (1977)

work page 1977
[25]

Linde,Particle physics and inflationary cosmology, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur (1990)

A. Linde,Particle physics and inflationary cosmology, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur (1990)

work page 1990
[26]

Riess et al.,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron

A.G. Riess et al.,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J., 116, 1009 (1998)

work page 1998
[27]

Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom42high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys

S. Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom42high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J., 517-565 (1999)

work page 1999
[28]

M.Enayati,J.-P.Gazeau,H.Pejhan,A.Wang,ThedeSitter(dS)GroupanditsRepresentations (2nd edition), Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Inönü, E.P

E. Inönü, E.P. Wigner,Representations of the Galilei group, Nuovo Cimento, 9, 705 (1952)

work page 1952
[30]

Lévy-Leblond,Galilei group and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, J

J.M. Lévy-Leblond,Galilei group and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys., 4, 776 (1963)

work page 1963
[31]

J.Voisin,OnsomeunitaryrepresentationsoftheGalileigroupI.Irreduciblerepresentations, J. Math. Phys. 6, 1519 (1965); andOn the unitary representations of the Galilei group. II. Two-particle systems, J. Math. Phys., 6, 1822 (1965)

work page 1965
[32]

Gürsey, T.D

F. Gürsey, T.D. Lee,Spin1/2wave equation in de-Sitter space, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 40, 179 (1963)

work page 1963
[33]

Fronsdal,Elementary particles in a curved space, Rev

C. Fronsdal,Elementary particles in a curved space, Rev. Mod. Phys., 37, 221 (1965)

work page 1965
[34]

Fronsdal,Elementary particles in a curved space

C. Fronsdal,Elementary particles in a curved space. II, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 589 (1974)

work page 1974
[35]

Aldrovandi, J.P.B

R. Aldrovandi, J.P.B. Almeida, J.G. Pereira,de Sitter special relativity, Class. Quant. Grav., 24.6, 1385 (2007)

work page 2007
[36]

Enayati, J.-P

M. Enayati, J.-P. Gazeau, M.A. del Olmo, H. Pejhan,Anti-de Sitterian “massive” elementary systems and their Minkowskian and Newton-Hooke contraction limits, J. Math. Phys., 66, 053501 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Bacry, J.M

H. Bacry, J.M. Levy-Leblond,Possible kinematics, J. Math. Phys., 9, 1605 (1968)

work page 1968
[38]

M.Levy-Nahas,DeformationandcontractionofLiealgebras,J.Math.Phys.,8,1211(1967)

work page 1967
[39]

A.O.Barut,A.Böhm,ReductionofaclassofO(4,2)representationswithrespecttoSO(4,1) and SO(3,2), J. Math. Phys., 11.10, 2938-2945 (1970)

work page 1970
[40]

E.Angelopoulos,M.Flato,C.Fronsdal,D.Sternheimer,Masslessparticles,conformalgroup, and de Sitter universe, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1278 (1981)

work page 1981
[41]

Binegar, C

B. Binegar, C. Fronsdal, W. Heidenreich,Conformal Q.E.D., J. Math. Phys., 24, 2828-2846 (1983)

work page 1983
[42]

V.K.Dobrev,V.B.Petkova.Allpositiveenergyunitaryirreduciblerepresentationsofextended conformal supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 162, 127-132 (1985)

work page 1985
[43]

M.Flato,C.Fronsdal,J.-P.Gazeau,Masslessnessandlight-conepropagationin3+2deSitter and2+1Minkowski spaces, Phys. Rev. D 33, 415 (1986)

work page 1986
[44]

Branson,Group Representations Arising from Lorentz Conformal Geometry, J

T.P. Branson,Group Representations Arising from Lorentz Conformal Geometry, J. Funct. Anal., 74, 199-291 (1987)

work page 1987
[45]

Gazeau, M

J.-P. Gazeau, M. Hans, R. Murenzi,Invariant bilinear forms on3+2de Sitter space, Class. Quant. Grav., 6, 329 (1989)

work page 1989
[46]

Francesco, P

P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, D. Sénéchal,Conformal field theory, Springer Science Business Media (1997)

work page 1997
[47]

E.Angelopoulos,M.Laoues,Masslessnessin𝑛-dimensions,Rev.Math.Phys.,10.03,271-299 (1998)

work page 1998
[48]

Massless

T.Garidi,J.-P.Gazeau,S.Rouhani,M.V.Takook,“Massless”vectorfieldindeSitteruniverse, J. Math. Phys. 49, 032501 (2008)

work page 2008
[49]

A.Jadczyk,ConformallycompactifiedMinkowskispace:Mythsandfacts,PrespacetimeJour- nal, 3(2) (2012)

work page 2012
[50]

Pejhan, S

H. Pejhan, S. Rahbardehghan,Covariant and infrared-free graviton two-point function in de Sitter spacetime. II, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 104030 (2016)

work page 2016
[51]

Pejhan, S

H. Pejhan, S. Rahbardehghan,Covariant and infrared-free graviton two-point function in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 044016 (2016). References 159

work page 2016
[52]

Bamba,S.Rahbardehghan,H

K. Bamba,S.Rahbardehghan,H. Pejhan,Vacuumstates forgravitonsfield indeSitterspace, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 106009 (2017)

work page 2017
[53]

H.Pejhan,K.Bamba,S.Rahbardehghan,M.Enayati,Masslessspin-2fieldindeSitterspace, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 045007 (2018)

work page 2018
[54]

Pejhan, M

H. Pejhan, M. Enayati, J.-P. Gazeau, A. Wang,Gupta-Bleuler quantization for linearized gravity in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 066012 (2019)

work page 2019
[55]

Pejhan, S

H. Pejhan, S. Rahbardehghan, M. Enayati, K. Bamba, A. Wang,‘Hidden’ symmetry of lin- earized gravity in de Sitter space, Phys. Lett. B, 795, 220 (2019)

work page 2019
[56]

Gazeau, H

J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan,Covariant quantization of the partially massless graviton field in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D, 108, 065012 (2023)

work page 2023
[57]

Letsios,(Non-) unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP, 2023(5), 1-34 (2023)

V.A. Letsios,(Non-) unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP, 2023(5), 1-34 (2023)

work page 2023
[58]

G.Şengör,Searchingfordiscreteseriesrepresentationsatthelate-timeboundaryofdeSitter, InternationalWorkshopLIETHEORYANDITSAPPLICATIONSINPHYSICS.Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, (2023)

work page 2023
[59]

Gazeau, H

J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan,Unified framework for graviton, partially massless graviton, and photonfieldsindeSitterspacetimeundertheconformalsymmetry,Phys.Rev.D,111.105003 (2025)

work page 2025
[60]

Gazeau, H

J.-P. Gazeau, H. Pejhan,A misleading naming convention: de Sitter ‘tachyonic’ scalar fields, Found. Phys., 55, 8 (2025)

work page 2025
[61]

M.Botshekananfard,E.BGüraksın,andG.Şengör,LadderoperatorsofthedeSitteralgebra, arXiv:2510.05735 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Farnsworth, K

K. Farnsworth, K. Hinterbichler, S. Saha,Hidden conformal symmetry of the discrete series scalars in dS2, Phys. Rev. D, 111(10), 105002 (2025)

work page 2025
[63]

Huguet, J

E. Huguet, J. Queva, J. Renaud,FLRW embeddings inR𝑛+2, differential geometry and con- formal photon propagator, arXiv:2512.10901 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Bunch, P.C.W

T.S. Bunch, P.C.W. Davies,Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: renormalization by point-splitting, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 360, 117 (1978)

work page 1978
[65]

Birrell, P.C.W

N.D. Birrell, P.C.W. Davies,Quantum fields in curved space, Cambridge University Press, (1984)

work page 1984
[66]

Allen,Vacuum states in de Sitter space, Phys

B. Allen,Vacuum states in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D, 32, 3136 (1985)

work page 1985
[67]

Lett., 73, 1746 (1994)

J.Bros,J.-P.Gazeau,U.Moschella,QuantumfieldtheoryinthedeSitteruniverse,Phys.Rev. Lett., 73, 1746 (1994)

work page 1994
[68]

Phys., 08, 327 (1996)

J.Bros,U.Moschella,Two-pointfunctionsandquantumfieldsindeSitteruniverse,Rev.Math. Phys., 08, 327 (1996)

work page 1996
[69]

J. Bros, H. Epstein, U. Moschella,Analyticity properties and thermal effects for general quantum field theory on de Sitter space-time, Commun. Math. Phys., 196, 535 (1998)

work page 1998
[70]

J. Bros, H. Epstein, U. Moschella,The lifetime of a massive particle in a de Sitter universe, JCAP 003, 02 (2008)

work page 2008
[71]

Marolf, I.A

D. Marolf, I.A. Morrison,Infrared stability of de Sitter QFT: Results at all orders, Phys. Rev. D, 84(4), 044040 (2011)

work page 2011
[72]

J.-P.Gazeau,H.Pejhan,Matter-antimatter(a)symmetryindeSitterUniverse,EPL.,14859001 (2024)

work page 2024
[73]

T.Basile,E.Joung,K.Mkrtchyan,andM.Mojaza,Spinor-helicityrepresentationsofparticles of any mass in dS4 and AdS4 spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D, 109(12), 125003 (2024)

work page 2024
[74]

Penedones, K

J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, Z. Sun,Hilbert space of Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D, 111(4), 045001 (2025)

work page 2025
[75]

Higuchi, V.A

A. Higuchi, V.A. Letsios,Unitary rigid supersymmetry for the chiral graviton and chiral gravitino in de Sitter spacetime, arXiv:2503.04515 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[76]

Kaplan, D

M. Kaplan, D. Marolf, X. Yu, and Y. Zhao,De Sitter quantum gravity and the emergence of local algebras, JHEP, 2025(4), 1-47 (2025)

work page 2025
[77]

P. Dey, Z. Huang, and A. Lipstein,de Sitter locality from conformal field theory, arXiv:2508.15627 (2025). 160 4 Conformal Massless low-helicity Fields and their de Sitter (dS) Spacetime Restriction

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

S.B.Giddings,Quantumgravityobservables:observation,algebras,andmathematicalstruc- ture, arXiv:2505.22708 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

Cirafici,Gravitational algebras and applications to nonequilibrium physics, Universe, 11(1), 24 (2025)

M. Cirafici,Gravitational algebras and applications to nonequilibrium physics, Universe, 11(1), 24 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

Verlinde, M

H. Verlinde, M. Zhang,SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity, JHEP, 2025(5), 1-28 (2025)

work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.