pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.20358 · v2 · pith:2W6BBZ6Rnew · submitted 2026-01-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Coupled-wire descriptions of unconventional quantum states in twisted nanostructures

Chen-Hsuan Hsu , Anna Ohorodnyk This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords coupled wire modelmoiré materialstwisted bilayersquantum Hall effectfractional quantum Hallquantum spin Halltopological statesstrongly correlated electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupled wires in moiré networks realize the full set of quantum Hall states and their fractional versions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines how networks of one-dimensional channels in twisted two-dimensional materials can be described using the coupled-wire framework. The framework, originally developed for systems like cuprates and quantum Hall states, now applies to a tunable nanoscale platform. It shows that these networks can host quantum Hall, quantum spin Hall, and quantum anomalous Hall states along with fractional counterparts. The electrical tunability allows switching between competing phases such as superconductivity and insulating states. This positions twisted nanostructures as a versatile setting for studying topology and strong correlations in low dimensions.

Core claim

The paper claims that the coupled-wire framework applied to moiré networks completes the trio of quantum Hall phenomena by encompassing quantum Hall, quantum spin Hall, and quantum anomalous Hall states together with their fractional analogues.

What carries the argument

Coupled-wire networks formed by one-dimensional channels in two-dimensional moiré and twisted materials, using bosonic descriptions to model their low-energy physics.

If this is right

  • These systems enable continuous electrical tuning of interaction strength, confinement, and inter-wire coupling to access different phases.
  • Superconductivity, charge and spin density waves, Mott and Anderson insulators can all emerge in the same platform.
  • The framework unifies descriptions of integer and fractional versions of the three quantum Hall types in one setting.
  • Experimental control in nanoscale materials makes these states more accessible than in traditional systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar coupled-wire models might apply to other twisted bilayer systems beyond the ones reviewed.
  • Future experiments could measure the transition points between the different Hall states by varying gate voltages.
  • This approach suggests that low-dimensional channels in van der Waals heterostructures generally support bosonic field theory descriptions.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy behavior of the one-dimensional channels inside moiré and twisted materials is accurately captured by the same bosonic coupled-wire models used in earlier condensed matter systems.

What would settle it

A direct experimental demonstration that the same moiré sample can be tuned to show signatures of both quantum spin Hall and quantum anomalous Hall states would support the claim; failure to observe one while the model predicts it would challenge the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.20358 by Anna Ohorodnyk, Chen-Hsuan Hsu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Schematic illustration of the moir´e pattern in twisted bilayer graphene (purple). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Schematic illustration of the domain wall network and its low-energy spectrum. In the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase diagram of correlated coupled wires in twisted bilayer graphene as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Localization length (ξloc) and temperature (Tloc) of the domain wall network as a function of interlayer bias (Vd) and screening length (d). The figures are reproduced from Ref. 46. terlayer bias typically enhances electron-electron interactions and thus favors lo￾calization, whereas stronger electrostatic screening suppresses long-range interwire couplings and can partially counteract this trend. Estimate… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of electrons, ψℓmσ (with ℓ ∈ {R, L} and σ ∈ {↑, ↓}), propagating along the domain walls and experiencing a periodic potential, V (x), generated by the moir´e pattern. The colors of the domain walls correspond to those used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Categories of moir´e umklapp scatterings allowed at the filling factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Trio of quantum Hall phenomena (top) and their corresponding coupled-wire description [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Schematic of an interedge tunneling setup between two chiral bosonic modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Schematic illustration of interedge backscattering between two chiral edge modes; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: Schematic of a system comprising localized moments (pink) and sliding Luttinger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: illustration of the spatially phase coherent spin helix stabilized by the RKKY inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coupled-wire description has been developed as a powerful framework for providing bosonic descriptions of strongly correlated quantum matter, with early applications to systems such as the cuprates and the integer and fractional quantum Hall states. In this topical review, we discuss recent developments of coupled-wire description in nanoscale systems, where it emerges not only as a theoretical tool but also as a highly tunable physical platform. In these nanoscale realizations, coupled-wire networks are formed by one-dimensional channels embedded in two-dimensional materials, most prominently in moir\'e and twisted structures. Such networks host a broad range of unconventional states of matter, including superconductivity, charge density waves, spin density waves, Mott insulating phases, Anderson insulating phases, quantum spin Hall states, quantum anomalous Hall states, and their fractionalized counterparts. The ability to electrically control interaction strength, confinement, and coupling between wires makes these systems qualitatively different from earlier realizations and allows continuous tuning between competing phases. Notably, recent work has demonstrated that the coupled-wire framework in moir\'e networks completes the trio of quantum Hall phenomena, encompassing quantum Hall, quantum spin Hall, and quantum anomalous Hall states, together with their fractional analogues. This development highlights coupled-wire networks in nanoscale materials as a versatile and experimentally relevant setting for exploring the interplay of topology, strong correlations, and low-dimensional physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This topical review summarizes the coupled-wire framework's applications to moiré and twisted nanostructures, where 1D channels embedded in 2D materials form tunable networks. It covers bosonic descriptions of states including superconductivity, charge/spin density waves, Mott/Anderson insulators, quantum spin Hall states, quantum anomalous Hall states, and their fractional analogues. The review stresses electrical control of interactions and couplings, and highlights that recent work using this approach completes the set of quantum Hall, quantum spin Hall, and quantum anomalous Hall phenomena together with fractional versions.

Significance. If the literature summary is accurate, the review consolidates an emerging experimental platform that makes coupled-wire physics highly tunable and relevant to mesoscopic systems. Credit is due for clearly framing how the framework unifies topological phases (QHE/QSHE/QAHE) in moiré networks without introducing new derivations; this provides a useful reference for researchers working at the intersection of topology, correlations, and low-dimensional nanostructures.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that coupled-wire constructions in moiré networks 'complete the trio of quantum Hall phenomena' is the central narrative claim; to support it, the review should explicitly identify (with citations) the specific recent works that realize the quantum anomalous Hall state and its fractional analogue within this framework, rather than leaving the completion as an assertion.
minor comments (2)
  1. The modeling assumption that 1D channels in twisted structures are faithfully captured by the same bosonic wire descriptions used in cuprates and conventional QH systems is inherited from the cited literature; a short paragraph clarifying the regime of validity (e.g., interaction strength or moiré period relative to wire spacing) would improve clarity without altering the review character.
  2. Ensure consistent use of acronyms (e.g., expand QSH, QAHE on first appearance) and verify that all referenced works appear in the bibliography with complete details.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive report on our topical review. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the significance of the coupled-wire framework in the context of tunable moiré networks. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that coupled-wire constructions in moiré networks 'complete the trio of quantum Hall phenomena' is the central narrative claim; to support it, the review should explicitly identify (with citations) the specific recent works that realize the quantum anomalous Hall state and its fractional analogue within this framework, rather than leaving the completion as an assertion.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the abstract would be strengthened by explicitly citing the specific recent works that realize the quantum anomalous Hall state and its fractional analogue. The main text of the review already discusses these developments in dedicated sections with the relevant citations. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to name these works directly (with citations) so that the central narrative claim is supported by concrete references rather than a general statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no internal derivations reducing to inputs

full rationale

This topical review summarizes existing literature on coupled-wire constructions in moiré and twisted nanostructures without advancing new derivations, theorems, or equations. The central claim reports that prior works have realized quantum Hall, spin Hall, and anomalous Hall states (including fractional versions) using these frameworks. Modeling assumptions are inherited from the cited literature rather than asserted or fitted here. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs or self-referential equations. Any self-citations are non-load-bearing and do not elevate the circularity score beyond a minor level.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a topical review paper. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves; all technical content is drawn from the cited prior literature on coupled-wire constructions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5762 in / 1133 out tokens · 49974 ms · 2026-05-22T12:26:03.884948+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tomonaga,Prog

    S. Tomonaga,Prog. Theor. Phys.5(1950) 544

    work page 1950

  2. [2]

    J. M. Luttinger,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 1154

    work page 1963

  3. [3]

    F. D. M. Haldane,J. Phys. C14(1981) 2585

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, New York, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, New York, 2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    V. J. Emery, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson and T. C. Lubensky,Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 2160

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Vishwanath and D

    A. Vishwanath and D. Carpentier,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 676

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Mukhopadhyay, C

    R. Mukhopadhyay, C. L. Kane and T. C. Lubensky,Phys. Rev. B63(2001) 081103(R)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Mukhopadhyay, C

    R. Mukhopadhyay, C. L. Kane and T. C. Lubensky,Phys. Rev. B64(2001) 045120

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    C. L. Kane, R. Mukhopadhyay and T. C. Lubensky,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 036401

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Klinovaja and D

    J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 196401

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Klinovaja and Y

    J. Klinovaja and Y. Tserkovnyak,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 115426

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Klinovaja and D

    J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Eur. Phys. J. B87(2014) 171

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, C. Mudry and R. Thomale,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 205101

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Sagi and Y

    E. Sagi and Y. Oreg,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 201102(R)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 085101

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Klinovaja, Y

    J. Klinovaja, Y. Tserkovnyak and D. Loss,Phys. Rev. B91(2015) 085426

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    R. A. Santos, C.-W. Huang, Y. Gefen and D. B. Gutman,Phys. Rev. B91(2015) 205141

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Fuji and A

    Y. Fuji and A. Furusaki,Phys. Rev. B99(2019) 035130

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Imamura, K

    Y. Imamura, K. Totsuka and T. H. Hansson,Phys. Rev. B100(2019) 125148

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Meng,Eur

    T. Meng,Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.229(2020) 527

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Fuji and A

    Y. Fuji and A. Furusaki,Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023) 043108

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald,Nat. Mater.19(2020) 1265

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov and A. F. Young,Nat. Phys.16(2020) 725. January 29, 2026 1:34 arxiv Coupled-wire descriptions of unconventional quantum states in twisted nanostructures25

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani and A. F. Young,Nat. Rev. Mater.6(2021) 201

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. N. Basov, A. N. Pasupathy and A. Rubio,Nat. Phys.17(2021) 155

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras and P. Jarillo- Herrero,Nature (London)556(2018) 43

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez- Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori and P. Jarillo- Herrero,Nature (London)556(2018) 80

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    San-Jose and E

    P. San-Jose and E. Prada,Phys. Rev. B88(2013) 121408(R)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    J. S. Alden, A. W. Tsen, P. Y. Huang, R. Hovden, L. Brown, J. Park, D. A. Muller and P. L. McEuen,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110(2013) 11256

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. B. Torrisi, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin and E. Kaxiras,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 224102

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Andjelkovi´ c, L

    M. Andjelkovi´ c, L. Covaci and F. M. Peeters,Phys. Rev. Mater.2(2018) 034004

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 035404

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Huang, K

    S. Huang, K. Kim, D. K. Efimkin, T. Lovorn, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. H. MacDonald, E. Tutuc and B. J. LeRoy,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 037702

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Ramires and J

    A. Ramires and J. L. Lado,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 146801

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Rickhaus, J

    P. Rickhaus, J. Wallbank, S. Slizovskiy, R. Pisoni, H. Overweg, Y. Lee, M. Eich, M.-H. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin,Nano Lett.18(2018) 6725

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu and E. Kaxiras,Phys. Rev. Res.1(2019) 013001

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    S. G. Xu, A. I. Berdyugin, P. Kumaravadivel, F. Guinea, R. K. Kumar, D. A. Ban- durin, S. V. Morozov, W. Kuang, B. Tsim, S. Liu, J. H. Edgar, I. V. Grigorieva, V. I. Fal’ko, M. Kim and A. K. Geim,Nat. Commun.10(2019) 4008

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    H. Yoo, R. Engelke, S. Carr, S. Fang, K. Zhang, P. Cazeaux, S. H. Sung, R. Hovden, A. W. Tsen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G.-C. Yi, M. Kim, M. Luskin, E. B. Tadmor, E. Kaxiras and P. Kim,Nat. Mater.18(2019) 448

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Fleischmann, R

    M. Fleischmann, R. Gupta, F. Wullschl¨ ager, S. Theil, D. Weckbecker, V. Meded, S. Sharma, B. Meyer and S. Shallcross,Nano Lett.20(2020) 971

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    T. Hou, Y. Ren, Y. Quan, J. Jung, W. Ren and Z. Qiao,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 201403(R)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    B. Tsim, N. N. T. Nam and M. Koshino,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 125409

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    N. R. Walet and F. Guinea,2D Mater.7(2019) 015023

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    J. D. Verbakel, Q. Yao, K. Sotthewes and H. J. W. Zandvliet,Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) 165134

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Mondal, R

    C. Mondal, R. Ghadimi and B.-J. Yang,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) L121405

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Wittig, F

    P. Wittig, F. Dominguez, C. De Beule and P. Recher,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 085431

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Wang and C.-H

    H.-C. Wang and C.-H. Hsu,2D Mater.11(2024) 035007

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Wu, C.-M

    X.-C. Wu, C.-M. Jian and C. Xu,Phys. Rev. B99(2019) 161405(R)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Chou, Y.-P

    Y.-Z. Chou, Y.-P. Lin, S. Das Sarma and R. M. Nandkishore,Phys. Rev. B100 (2019) 115128

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    C. Chen, A. H. Castro Neto and V. M. Pereira,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 165431

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    E. J. K¨ onig, P. Coleman and A. M. Tsvelik,Phys. Rev. B102(2020) 104514

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    J. M. Lee, M. Oshikawa and G. Y. Cho,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 186601

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    C.-H. Hsu, D. Loss and J. Klinovaja,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) L121409

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Chang, K

    Y.-Y. Chang, K. Saito and C.-H. Hsu,Phys. Rev. Res.7(2025) L032066

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    C. Kane, L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher,Phys. Rev. Lett.79(1997) 5086

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108(2011) 12233

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    N. N. T. Nam and M. Koshino,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 075311. January 29, 2026 1:34 arxiv 26C.-H. Hsu and A. Ohorodnyk

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Koshino, N

    M. Koshino, N. F. Q. Yuan, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki and L. Fu,Phys. Rev. X8(2018) 031087

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov and A. Vishwanath,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 106405

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Koshino and N

    M. Koshino and N. N. T. Nam,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 195425

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Nakatsuji, T

    N. Nakatsuji, T. Kawakami and M. Koshino,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 041007

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Egger and A

    R. Egger and A. O. Gogolin,Phys. Rev. Lett.79(1997) 5082

    work page 1997

  62. [62]

    Egger and A

    R. Egger and A. Gogolin,Eur. Phys. J. B3(1998) 281

    work page 1998

  63. [63]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Phys. Rev. B92(2015) 235435

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Wentzel,Phys

    G. Wentzel,Phys. Rev.83(1951) 168

    work page 1951

  65. [65]

    Bardeen,Rev

    J. Bardeen,Rev. Mod. Phys.23(1951) 261

    work page 1951

  66. [66]

    Engelsberg and B

    S. Engelsberg and B. B. Varga,Phys. Rev.136(1964) A1582

    work page 1964

  67. [67]

    Loss and T

    D. Loss and T. Martin,Phys. Rev. B50(1994) 12160

    work page 1994

  68. [68]

    Martin and D

    T. Martin and D. Loss,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B09(1995) 495

    work page 1995

  69. [69]

    Hsu,Nanoscale Horiz.9(2024) 1725

    C.-H. Hsu,Nanoscale Horiz.9(2024) 1725

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Furusaki and N

    A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa,Phys. Rev. B47(1993) 4631

    work page 1993

  71. [71]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello and T. V. Ramakrishnan,Phys. Rev. Lett.42(1979) 673

    work page 1979

  72. [72]

    Abrahams, ed.,50 Years of Anderson Localization(World Scientific, 2010)

    E. Abrahams, ed.,50 Years of Anderson Localization(World Scientific, 2010)

    work page 2010

  73. [73]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz,Phys. Rev. B37(1988) 325

    work page 1988

  74. [74]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 081405(R)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Phys. Rev. B97(2018) 125432

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja and D. Loss,Semicond. Sci. Technol.36(2021) 123003

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan and K. F. Mak,Nature628(2024) 522

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Devakul, P

    T. Devakul, P. J. Ledwith, L.-Q. Xia, A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, P. Jarillo-Herrero and L. Fu,Sci. Adv.9(2023) eadi6063

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    P. Wang, G. Yu, Y. H. Kwan, Y. Jia, S. Lei, S. Klemenz, F. A. Cevallos, R. Singha, T. Devakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. L. Sondhi, R. J. Cava, L. M. Schoop, S. A. Parameswaran and S. Wu,Nature (London)605(2022) 57

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    G. Yu, P. Wang, A. J. Uzan, Y. Jia, M. Onyszczak, R. Singha, X. Gui, T. Song, Y. Tang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, L. M. Schoop and S. Wu,Nat. Commun.14(2023) 7025

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.