An Approach to Probing Particles and Quasi-particles in the Condensed Bose-Hubbard Model

Huy Nguyen; Jacob M. Taylor; Yu-Xin Wang

arxiv: 2602.05924 · v4 · submitted 2026-02-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

An Approach to Probing Particles and Quasi-particles in the Condensed Bose-Hubbard Model

Huy Nguyen , Yu-Xin Wang , Jacob M. Taylor This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

keywords Bose-Hubbard modelquasiparticlesphase contrast imagingBose-Einstein condensatemeasurement backactioncold atomsmany-body dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Phase contrast imaging on Bose-Einstein condensate arrays can be tuned to probe either bare particle or quasiparticle dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the choice of parameters in phase contrast imaging of cold-atom systems affects both the information obtained and the backaction on the quantum many-body state. In the condensed Bose-Hubbard model restricted to the low-temperature and low-momentum regime, the analysis shows that the imaging light can interact with either the bare particles or the collective quasiparticle excitations depending on those parameters. The work further identifies conditions for directly selecting quasiparticle modes and for directing the measurement-induced creation and diffusion of quasiparticles across momentum states. This matters because measurement in quantum systems is never passive; the same tool that reads the state also reshapes it, and the ability to steer that reshaping opens controlled studies of many-body dynamics.

Core claim

In the low-temperature and low-momentum limit of the condensed Bose-Hubbard model, phase contrast imaging admits parameter regimes that selectively couple to bare-particle dynamics or to quasiparticle dynamics; the same framework supplies a route to measure quasiparticle modes directly and to control the momentum distribution of measurement-created quasiparticles.

What carries the argument

Parameter-dependent coupling of phase contrast imaging light to the particle versus quasiparticle basis in the low-momentum Bose-Hubbard condensate.

If this is right

Tuning imaging parameters isolates either bare-particle or quasiparticle observables in the same physical system.
Quasiparticle modes can be read out without mixing in the bare-particle background.
Measurement backaction can be directed so that created quasiparticles populate chosen momentum states rather than spreading diffusively.
The same control distinguishes the effects of different experimental probing methods on many-body evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach supplies a concrete handle on measurement-induced quasiparticle dynamics that could be used to test models in which continuous monitoring modifies the effective Hamiltonian.
Extension beyond the low-momentum limit would require checking whether the bare-particle versus quasiparticle distinction survives when higher-momentum components become populated.
The framework may be adapted to other imaging schemes, such as absorption imaging, to compare how each couples to the same underlying excitations.

Load-bearing premise

The separation into distinct bare-particle and quasiparticle regimes holds only inside the low-temperature and low-momentum limit.

What would settle it

A direct numerical or experimental check of the imaging response at fixed low temperature but increasing momentum; if the predicted switch between particle-like and quasiparticle-like signatures disappears outside the stated limit, the central distinction collapses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05924 by Huy Nguyen, Jacob M. Taylor, Yu-Xin Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (a) illustrates the atomic levels and the dissipative process. The expectation values of σij evolve under the ad2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: In the wide measurement-bandwidth regime, the detuning ∆ of the probe state is much larger than the Rabi drive Ω, while the strengths of intrinsic parameters of the tunneling system, δR and t are comparable to Ω. Additionally, the damping rate κ is taken to be large relative to Ω, implying that the dynamical variables of |r⟩, namely, σri (i = 0, 1, e) evolve and decay much more rapidly than those that onl… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Weakly-interacting Bose–Hubbard lattice schematic, where the bare bosonic state a † j0 |vac⟩ at site j = j0 is Rabi driven to an excited probe state r † |vac⟩. (a) Lossless measurement in which the excited probe bosons remain in the trap. (b) Dissipative measurement in which the excited probe bosons leak from the trap. atomic Hamiltonian eigenstates or a desired state superposition. In this section, we now… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The correspondence between bare bosons (in momentum space) and Bogoliubov quasiparticles, described by the relative ratio between Bogoliubov parameters as function of momentum norm. In higher momenta (or higher excitations), the bosons behave more like a quasiparticle. high momenta. At low momentum k, these coefficients are equal in amplitude, which means that a Bogoliubov quasiparticle is made of the ori… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Damping rate resonances. The shaded red regions are forbidden by the SW condition. Although not relevant to our measurement protocol, in the case of dephasing, poles also appear when Πall sites,k = 0. At these values, defined by ∆Π(k) = 2t cos(k − p) − uk−vk uk+vk or ∆Π(k) = 2t cos(k − p) − uk+vk uk−vk , the (unnormalized) operator Bk simply behaves classically. IV. MEASUREMENT-INDUCED CONDENSATE HEATING … view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Quasiparticle heating over time for N = 7 without loss. On the other hand, when dissipation does not oc11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Quasiparticle heating of a 7-site system over time due to loss, in the narrow measurement bandwidth. In both figures, we tune ∆ to be near ∆q = 2t cos(q − p) − Eb,q for q = 0.9, such that the quasiparticle heating of mode q = 0.9 (red) is suppressed. The left figure plots numerical average quasiparticle increase in all 6 quasiparticle modes, whereas the right figure compares the numerical result against th… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Quasiparticle heating over time without loss, in the narrow measurement bandwidth. In this plot, we also tune ∆ to be near ∆q = 2t cos(q − p) − Eb,q for q = 2. lossless case, but with pronounced anisotropy. Notably, unlike the lossy case—where heating of the measured q = 2 mode is suppressed by the dominant decay channel—the heating here is instead enhanced, since the effect of near-resonant tuning now … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Measurement plays a crucial role in a quantum system beyond just learning about the system state: it changes the post-measurement state and hence influences the subsequent time evolution; further, measurement can even create entanglement in the post-measurement conditional state. In this work, we study how careful choice of parameters for a typical measurement process on cold atoms systems -- phase contrast imaging -- has a strong impact on both what the experimentalist observes but also on the backaction the measurement has on the system, including the creation and diffusion of quasiparticles emerging from the quantum many-body dynamics. We focus on the case of a Bose-Einstein-condensate array, in the low-temperature and low-momentum limit. Our theoretical investigation reveals regimes where the imaging light probes either the bare particle or quasiparticle dynamics. Moreover, we find a path to selectively measuring quasiparticle modes directly, as well as controlling over the measurement-induced creation and diffusion of quasiparticles into different momentum states. This lays a foundation for understanding the effects of both experimental approaches for probing many-body systems, but also more speculative directions such as observable consequences of `spontaneous collapse' predictions from novel models of quantum gravity on aspects of the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Tunable parameter regimes allow selective probing of quasiparticles versus bare particles in Bose-Hubbard condensates via phase contrast imaging.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper works out how to tune phase-contrast imaging parameters on a condensed Bose-Hubbard system so the measurement picks up either bare particle or quasiparticle dynamics, and it gives a route to selective quasiparticle readout while controlling the creation and diffusion of those quasiparticles. They apply standard Bogoliubov expansion and linear-response treatment of the imaging light to identify concrete regimes in the low-temperature, low-momentum limit. The separation into different probing regimes and the control over backaction are the new elements here, and they could be useful for quantum-gas experiments that want to minimize unwanted effects on the many-body state. The main limitation is the tight scoping to that low-T, low-momentum regime; the distinction likely breaks down elsewhere. The derivations rely on established methods, so no obvious circularity, though without seeing the full equations it's hard to judge the error estimates. The quantum-gravity paragraph is clearly an outlook and not part of the core result. This is for experimentalists and theorists in cold atoms and quantum simulation who deal with measurement backaction. A reader interested in quasiparticle dynamics or controlled probing would get value from the protocols. It shows honest engagement with the literature and standard tools, so it deserves a serious referee. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The practical angle for experiments makes it worth the effort even if some details need tightening.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines phase-contrast imaging on a Bose-Einstein condensate array in the condensed Bose-Hubbard model, restricted to the low-temperature and low-momentum limit. Using Bogoliubov expansion and linear-response theory, it identifies parameter regimes in which the imaging light couples preferentially to bare-particle versus quasiparticle dynamics, derives a protocol for selective quasiparticle-mode readout, and analyzes measurement-induced quasiparticle creation and diffusion across momentum states. An outlook paragraph discusses possible links to spontaneous-collapse models of quantum gravity.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally actionable framework for distinguishing and selectively probing quasiparticles in lattice Bose gases. The reliance on standard many-body techniques (Bogoliubov theory plus linear response) yields falsifiable predictions for imaging parameters, which could guide future cold-atom experiments on measurement back-action and quasiparticle control.

minor comments (3)

The abstract and introduction would benefit from one or two explicit equations (e.g., the form of the imaging Hamiltonian or the Bogoliubov dispersion used) to make the central separation between bare-particle and quasiparticle regimes immediately visible to readers.
Section on the selective-measurement protocol should state the precise imaging detuning and intensity window that isolates quasiparticle modes; currently the boundaries are described only qualitatively.
The quantum-gravity outlook paragraph is clearly labeled as speculative, but a single sentence clarifying that it lies outside the technical scope of the derivations would prevent any misreading.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the supportive review and recommendation of minor revision. We address the points in the report below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The paper examines phase-contrast imaging on a Bose-Einstein condensate array in the condensed Bose-Hubbard model, restricted to the low-temperature and low-momentum limit. Using Bogoliubov expansion and linear-response theory, it identifies parameter regimes in which the imaging light couples preferentially to bare-particle versus quasiparticle dynamics, derives a protocol for selective quasiparticle-mode readout, and analyzes measurement-induced quasiparticle creation and diffusion across momentum states. An outlook paragraph discusses possible links to spontaneous-collapse models of quantum gravity.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's accurate summary of the manuscript. In the revised version we will add a short clarifying sentence in the outlook paragraph to better separate the speculative quantum-gravity discussion from the main technical results. revision: yes
Referee: If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally actionable framework for distinguishing and selectively probing quasiparticles in lattice Bose gases. The reliance on standard many-body techniques (Bogoliubov theory plus linear response) yields falsifiable predictions for imaging parameters, which could guide future cold-atom experiments on measurement back-action and quasiparticle control.

Authors: We agree with this assessment of the work's potential utility. We have inserted one additional sentence in the introduction that explicitly lists the imaging-parameter regimes that can be tested experimentally. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper restricts analysis to the low-temperature, low-momentum limit of the condensed Bose-Hubbard model and applies standard Bogoliubov expansion plus linear-response treatment of phase-contrast imaging. The separation into bare-particle versus quasiparticle regimes and the selective-measurement protocol follow directly from these standard approximations and the stated Hamiltonian; no step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or renamed input. The outlook paragraph on quantum gravity is explicitly non-technical and does not support any central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian in the condensed regime and on the usual description of phase-contrast imaging as a dispersive measurement; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Low-temperature and low-momentum limit for the BEC array
Explicitly stated as the regime of focus in the abstract.
standard math Phase contrast imaging acts as a dispersive measurement with controllable backaction
Standard assumption in quantum optics of cold atoms invoked throughout the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1366 out tokens · 39967 ms · 2026-05-16T06:49:22.986252+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

effective Hamiltonian and jump operators... Γ_eff,wide = √κ_wide σ_LL ... Γ_eff,narrow ∝ (σ_LR + ...)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Bogoliubov transformation ak = u_k b_k − v_k b†_−k ... E_b,k = √(A_k² − (U n_0)²)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 885 (2008)

work page 2008
[2]

M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Va- por, Science269, 198 (1995), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 1995
[3]

J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose- Einstein Condensates, Science292, 476 (2001), pub- lisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 2001
[4]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a su- perfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2002
[5]

C. A. Regal, M. Greiner, and D. S. Jin, Observa- tion of Resonance Condensation of Fermionic Atom Pairs, Physical Review Letters92, 040403 (2004), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2004
[6]

M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, S. M. F. Raupach, A. J. Kerman, and W. Ketterle, Conden- sation of Pairs of Fermionic Atoms near a Feshbach Resonance, Physical Review Letters92, 120403 (2004), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2004
[7]

Fallani, J

L. Fallani, J. E. Lye, V. Guarrera, C. Fort, and M. Inguscio, Ultracold Atoms in a Disordered Crys- tal of Light: Towards a Bose Glass, Physical Re- view Letters98, 130404 (2007), publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society

work page 2007
[8]

H. M. Hurst, S. Guo, and I. B. Spielman, Feedback induced magnetic phases in binary Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review Research2, 043325 (2020), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2020
[9]

Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the mi- croscopic observation of transparent objects, Phys- ica9, 686 (1942)

F. Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the mi- croscopic observation of transparent objects, Phys- ica9, 686 (1942)

work page 1942
[10]

Bogolubov, ON THE THEORY OF SUPER- FLUIDITY*, inHelium 4, edited by Z

N. Bogolubov, ON THE THEORY OF SUPER- FLUIDITY*, inHelium 4, edited by Z. M. Galasiewicz (Pergamon, 1971) pp. 247–267

work page 1971
[11]

Altunta¸ s and I

E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Weak-measurement- induced heating in Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review Research5, 023185 (2023)

work page 2023
[12]

Anastopoulos and B

C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, A master equation for gravitational decoherence: probing the textures of spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity30, 165007 (2013), publisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2013
[13]

Di´ osi, A universal master equation for the grav- itational violation of quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A120, 377 (1987)

L. Di´ osi, A universal master equation for the grav- itational violation of quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A120, 377 (1987)

work page 1987
[14]

Reiter and A

F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator for- malism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

work page 2012
[15]

Wang and Y

B. Wang and Y. Jiang, Bogoliubov approach to superfluid-Bose glass phase transitionof a disordered Bose-Hubbard model in weakly interacting regime, The European Physical Journal D70, 257 (2016)

work page 2016
[16]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quan- tum stochastic methods with applications to quan- tum optics, 3rd ed., Springer series in synergetics (Springer, Berlin ; New York, 2004)

work page 2004
[17]

Wang, R.-L

X.-Q. Wang, R.-L. Zeng, Z.-Y. Zhang, C. Tian, S. Zhang, A. Hemmerich, and Z.-F. Xu, Observation of Brownian Motion of a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Physical Review Letters134, 223402 (2025), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

work page 2025
[18]

Dalfovo and S

F. Dalfovo and S. Stringari, Bosons in anisotropic traps: Ground state and vortices, Physical Review A53, 2477 (1996)

work page 1996
[19]

Dalfovo, S

F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases, Reviews of Modern Physics71, 463 (1999), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1999
[20]

Bouten and A

L. Bouten and A. Silberfarb, Adiabatic Elimination in Quantum Stochastic Models, Communications in Mathematical Physics283, 491 (2008)

work page 2008
[21]

Paulisch, H

V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Beyond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of ap- proximations for multi-photon processes, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Plus129, 12 (2014)

work page 2014
[22]

C. W. Gardiner, Adiabatic elimination in stochastic systems. I. Formulation of methods and application to few-variable systems, Physical Review A29, 2814 (1984), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1984
[23]

E. P. Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in bo- son systems, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)20, 454 (1961)

work page 1955
[24]

L. P. Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Soviet Physics JETP13, 451 (1961)

work page 1961
[25]

M. R. Andrews, M.-O. Mewes, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Direct, Nondestructive Observation of a Bose Condensate, Science273, 84 (1996), publisher: American Asso- ciation for the Advancement of Science

work page 1996
[26]

Reitter, J

M. Reitter, J. N¨ ager, K. Wintersperger, C. Str¨ ater, I. Bloch, A. Eckardt, and U. Schneider, Interaction Dependent Heating and Atom Loss in a Periodi- cally Driven Optical Lattice, Physical Review Let- ters119, 200402 (2017). Appendix A: Schrieffer-Wolff Transformation of the Double-Well Atom Because the Schrieffer-Wolff transformatione−S is unitary, t...

work page 2017

[1] [1]

Bloch, J

I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 885 (2008)

work page 2008

[2] [2]

M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Va- por, Science269, 198 (1995), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 1995

[3] [3]

J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose- Einstein Condensates, Science292, 476 (2001), pub- lisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 2001

[4] [4]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a su- perfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2002

[5] [5]

C. A. Regal, M. Greiner, and D. S. Jin, Observa- tion of Resonance Condensation of Fermionic Atom Pairs, Physical Review Letters92, 040403 (2004), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2004

[6] [6]

M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, C. H. Schunck, S. M. F. Raupach, A. J. Kerman, and W. Ketterle, Conden- sation of Pairs of Fermionic Atoms near a Feshbach Resonance, Physical Review Letters92, 120403 (2004), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2004

[7] [7]

Fallani, J

L. Fallani, J. E. Lye, V. Guarrera, C. Fort, and M. Inguscio, Ultracold Atoms in a Disordered Crys- tal of Light: Towards a Bose Glass, Physical Re- view Letters98, 130404 (2007), publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society

work page 2007

[8] [8]

H. M. Hurst, S. Guo, and I. B. Spielman, Feedback induced magnetic phases in binary Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review Research2, 043325 (2020), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2020

[9] [9]

Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the mi- croscopic observation of transparent objects, Phys- ica9, 686 (1942)

F. Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the mi- croscopic observation of transparent objects, Phys- ica9, 686 (1942)

work page 1942

[10] [10]

Bogolubov, ON THE THEORY OF SUPER- FLUIDITY*, inHelium 4, edited by Z

N. Bogolubov, ON THE THEORY OF SUPER- FLUIDITY*, inHelium 4, edited by Z. M. Galasiewicz (Pergamon, 1971) pp. 247–267

work page 1971

[11] [11]

Altunta¸ s and I

E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Weak-measurement- induced heating in Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review Research5, 023185 (2023)

work page 2023

[12] [12]

Anastopoulos and B

C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, A master equation for gravitational decoherence: probing the textures of spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity30, 165007 (2013), publisher: IOP Publishing

work page 2013

[13] [13]

Di´ osi, A universal master equation for the grav- itational violation of quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A120, 377 (1987)

L. Di´ osi, A universal master equation for the grav- itational violation of quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A120, 377 (1987)

work page 1987

[14] [14]

Reiter and A

F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator for- malism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

work page 2012

[15] [15]

Wang and Y

B. Wang and Y. Jiang, Bogoliubov approach to superfluid-Bose glass phase transitionof a disordered Bose-Hubbard model in weakly interacting regime, The European Physical Journal D70, 257 (2016)

work page 2016

[16] [16]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quan- tum stochastic methods with applications to quan- tum optics, 3rd ed., Springer series in synergetics (Springer, Berlin ; New York, 2004)

work page 2004

[17] [17]

Wang, R.-L

X.-Q. Wang, R.-L. Zeng, Z.-Y. Zhang, C. Tian, S. Zhang, A. Hemmerich, and Z.-F. Xu, Observation of Brownian Motion of a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Physical Review Letters134, 223402 (2025), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

work page 2025

[18] [18]

Dalfovo and S

F. Dalfovo and S. Stringari, Bosons in anisotropic traps: Ground state and vortices, Physical Review A53, 2477 (1996)

work page 1996

[19] [19]

Dalfovo, S

F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases, Reviews of Modern Physics71, 463 (1999), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1999

[20] [20]

Bouten and A

L. Bouten and A. Silberfarb, Adiabatic Elimination in Quantum Stochastic Models, Communications in Mathematical Physics283, 491 (2008)

work page 2008

[21] [21]

Paulisch, H

V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Beyond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of ap- proximations for multi-photon processes, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Plus129, 12 (2014)

work page 2014

[22] [22]

C. W. Gardiner, Adiabatic elimination in stochastic systems. I. Formulation of methods and application to few-variable systems, Physical Review A29, 2814 (1984), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1984

[23] [23]

E. P. Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in bo- son systems, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)20, 454 (1961)

work page 1955

[24] [24]

L. P. Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Soviet Physics JETP13, 451 (1961)

work page 1961

[25] [25]

M. R. Andrews, M.-O. Mewes, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Direct, Nondestructive Observation of a Bose Condensate, Science273, 84 (1996), publisher: American Asso- ciation for the Advancement of Science

work page 1996

[26] [26]

Reitter, J

M. Reitter, J. N¨ ager, K. Wintersperger, C. Str¨ ater, I. Bloch, A. Eckardt, and U. Schneider, Interaction Dependent Heating and Atom Loss in a Periodi- cally Driven Optical Lattice, Physical Review Let- ters119, 200402 (2017). Appendix A: Schrieffer-Wolff Transformation of the Double-Well Atom Because the Schrieffer-Wolff transformatione−S is unitary, t...

work page 2017