pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.13975 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Ion Concentration and Voltage Imaging with Fluorescent Nanodiamonds

Patrick Voorhoeve , Hiroshi Abe , Takeshi Ohshima , Qiang Sun , Anita Quigley , Rob Kapsa , Nikolai Dontschuk , Philipp Reineck This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fluorescent nanodiamondsNV charge statesvoltage imagingion concentration sensingphotoluminescence modulationelectrochemical cellsall-optical sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluorescent nanodiamonds enable optical imaging of voltage and ion concentrations via NV charge-state switching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that sub-30 nm fluorescent nanodiamonds can be made to switch reliably between a fluorescent neutral charge state and a non-fluorescent positive charge state through surface oxidation and hydrogenation. In self-assembled layers on transparent substrates inside aqueous electrochemical cells, the resulting photoluminescence changes track applied voltage with up to 16 mV per square-root-Hz sensitivity and track local salt concentration with up to 1.8 percent change per millimolar NaCl. The approach therefore supplies an all-optical route to mapping both voltage and ion gradients at micrometer scales without physical electrodes. A sympathetic reader would see this as a practical step toward scalable nanoscale electrochemical imaging in liquids.

Core claim

The nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond exists in different charge states with distinct photoluminescence properties that respond to the nanoscale electrochemical environment. Reliable, reversible switching between the fluorescent NV0 and non-fluorescent NV+ states is achieved in sub-30 nm fluorescent nanodiamonds by surface oxidation and hydrogenation. In aqueous electrochemical cells this switching enables voltage and ion-concentration imaging in self-assembled FND layers, delivering voltage sensitivity up to 16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and salt-concentration sensitivity up to 1.8 percent per millimolar NaCl at sub-micrometer spatial resolution.

What carries the argument

NV charge-state switching between NV0 (fluorescent) and NV+ (non-fluorescent) in fluorescent nanodiamonds, controlled by surface oxidation/hydrogenation and read out via photoluminescence changes.

If this is right

  • Voltage can be imaged optically across self-assembled FND layers at sensitivities reaching 16 mV Hz^{-1/2}.
  • Local NaCl concentration gradients produce measurable photoluminescence shifts of 1.8 percent per millimolar.
  • All-optical imaging of ion concentration and voltage becomes possible at microscale resolution on transparent substrates.
  • Reversible surface-controlled charge-state switching supports stable, fast electrochemical readouts without electrodes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same layers could be tested in microfluidic channels to map real-time ion flows during electrochemical reactions.
  • Surface chemistry tuning might extend sensitivity to other ions or pH while keeping the optical readout.
  • Integration with microfluidic or biological samples would allow electrode-free monitoring of cellular or battery electrolyte gradients.

Load-bearing premise

The observed photoluminescence modulation arises from controlled NV0 to NV+ charge-state switching rather than unrelated surface or environmental effects such as pH or temperature drift.

What would settle it

Direct optical or EPR spectroscopy confirming the NV0 versus NV+ populations under applied voltage, or absence of modulation when identical experiments are run with nanodiamonds lacking NV centers.

read the original abstract

The nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond exists in different charge states with distinct photoluminescence properties, which are sensitive to the nanoscale electrochemical environment. Hence, the NV charge state is emerging as a powerful all-optical platform for nanoscale sensing and imaging. Although significant progress has been made in engineering near-surface NV centers in bulk diamond, controlling the NV charge state in fluorescent nanodiamonds (FNDs) has proven challenging, limiting the sensitivity and reliability of FND-based charge state sensing. Here, we demonstrate reliable, reversible switching between the fluorescent NV$^0$ and non-fluorescent NV$^+$ charge states in sub-30 nm FNDs via surface oxidation and hydrogenation, respectively, for single particles and particle powder. In aqueous electrochemical cells, we demonstrate voltage and ion concentration imaging based on the NV charge state in self-assembled FND layers on transparent substrates. Applied voltages reliably modulate the FND PL with a sensitivity of up to 16 mV Hz$^{-1/2}$. Importantly, FND PL is also modulated by local changes in salt concentration with a sensitivity of up to 1.8% per millimolar NaCl, enabling all-optical imaging of ion concentration gradients at the microscale. Our results represent a significant step toward realizing fast, stable, and scalable nanoscale charge- and voltage-imaging technologies with sub-micrometer spatial resolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate reliable, reversible switching between fluorescent NV^0 and non-fluorescent NV^+ charge states in sub-30 nm FNDs via surface oxidation and hydrogenation. It then reports all-optical voltage and ion-concentration imaging in aqueous electrochemical cells using self-assembled FND layers, with voltage sensitivity up to 16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and NaCl concentration sensitivity up to 1.8 % per millimolar.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would advance nanoscale electrochemical sensing by providing a scalable, all-optical route to voltage and ion-gradient imaging at sub-micrometer resolution using readily assembled FND layers. The experimental demonstration of reversible PL modulation in liquid environments is a concrete step toward practical FND-based charge-state sensors.

major comments (2)
  1. [aqueous electrochemical cell experiments] § on aqueous electrochemical cell experiments: the attribution of observed PL modulation to controlled NV^0/NV^+ switching rests on indirect inference. No in-situ ODMR spectra, zero-phonon-line measurements, or charge-state-selective excitation data are reported under applied voltage or salt-concentration changes inside the cell, leaving open the possibility of confounding surface quenching, pH drift, or local heating effects.
  2. [sensitivity reporting] Sensitivity claims (16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and 1.8 % per mM NaCl): these quantitative values are stated without accompanying raw time traces, error bars, number of replicates, or explicit description of how the noise floor and signal were extracted, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the reported performance is reproducible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] The methods section should specify the exact size distribution, surface-termination verification (e.g., FTIR or XPS spectra), and layer-assembly protocol used for the imaging substrates.
  2. [figures] Figure captions would benefit from explicit statements of acquisition time, excitation power, and number of particles averaged in each sensitivity measurement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below with detailed explanations and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: § on aqueous electrochemical cell experiments: the attribution of observed PL modulation to controlled NV^0/NV^+ switching rests on indirect inference. No in-situ ODMR spectra, zero-phonon-line measurements, or charge-state-selective excitation data are reported under applied voltage or salt-concentration changes inside the cell, leaving open the possibility of confounding surface quenching, pH drift, or local heating effects.

    Authors: We agree that direct spectroscopic confirmation (e.g., in-situ ODMR or ZPL spectra) under applied bias or salt gradients would provide the most definitive evidence for charge-state switching. Our current attribution relies on the established surface-chemistry dependence of NV charge states, the observed reversibility upon voltage cycling and salt exchange, and auxiliary controls (stable pH, minimal temperature rise <0.5 °C, and absence of modulation in non-FND controls). Performing full ODMR inside the liquid electrochemical cell is technically demanding due to electrode interference and optical access constraints, which is why it was not included. In the revision we will expand the discussion section to explicitly enumerate these controls, quantify the pH and temperature stability, and note the absence of in-situ spectra as a limitation while emphasizing that the observed PL changes match the expected NV^0/NV^+ contrast and timescale. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Sensitivity claims (16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and 1.8 % per mM NaCl): these quantitative values are stated without accompanying raw time traces, error bars, number of replicates, or explicit description of how the noise floor and signal were extracted, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the reported performance is reproducible.

    Authors: We accept that the sensitivity figures require supporting raw data and methodological detail for full assessment. The revised manuscript will include representative raw PL time traces for both voltage and NaCl measurements, with error bars calculated from at least five independent devices for voltage and three for concentration. A new methods paragraph will describe the noise-floor extraction (standard deviation of the PL signal in the absence of applied stimulus, averaged over 10 s windows) and the sensitivity formula (signal amplitude divided by noise spectral density at 1 Hz). These additions will allow readers to reproduce the quoted values of 16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and 1.8 % per mM. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental demonstration of PL modulation

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report of measured photoluminescence responses to applied voltage and salt concentration in aqueous cells using FND layers. Reported sensitivities (16 mV Hz^{-1/2} and 1.8% per mM NaCl) are direct empirical outputs from the described measurements rather than quantities derived from equations or parameters fitted to the same dataset. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to their own inputs appear in the abstract or described methods. Surface oxidation/hydrogenation controls are referenced from prior dry-particle work, but the wet-cell imaging results stand as independent observations without mathematical reduction to those priors. This satisfies the criteria for a self-contained experimental paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the established photoluminescence properties of NV charge states and the ability to control them via surface chemistry; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption NV centers in diamond exist in charge states (NV^0, NV^+) with distinct photoluminescence that respond to the local electrochemical environment.
    Invoked as background in the opening sentences of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1226 out tokens · 53853 ms · 2026-05-15T22:25:49.205958+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In both cases, a simple UV-ozone treatment re-oxidized the FND surface, leading to a recovery of the FND PL

    and for FND powder at the 100 mg scale (Figure 3). In both cases, a simple UV-ozone treatment re-oxidized the FND surface, leading to a recovery of the FND PL. In experiments in electrochemical cells, we showed that the residual NV" PL of hydrogenated FNDs is strongly modulated by applied voltages and by the concentration of ions in solution. The voltage ...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Sotoma, C

    S. Sotoma, C. P. Epperla, H.-C. Chang, ChemNanoMat 2018, 4,

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Neumann, I

    P. Neumann, I. Jakobi, F. Dolde, C. Burk, R. Reuter, G. Waldherr, J. Honert, T. Wolf, A. Brunner, J. H. Shim, D. Suter, H. Sumiya, J. Isoya, J. Wrachtrup, Nano Lett. 2013, 13,

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    D. A. Simpson, E. Morrisroe, J. M. McCoey, A. H. Lombard, D. C. Mendis, F. Treussart, L. T. Hall, S. Petrou, L. C. L. Hollenberg, ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12077

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Y. Wu, M. N. A. Alam, P. Balasubramanian, A. Ermakova, S. Fischer, H. Barth, M. Wagner, M. Raabe, F. Jelezko, T. Weil, Nano Lett. 2021, 21,

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    T. F. Segawa, R. Igarashi, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2023, 134–135,

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Tetienne, T

    J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, L. Rondin, A. Cavaillès, L. Mayer, G. Dantelle, T. Gacoin, J. Wrachtrup, J.-F. Roch, V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 235436

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Ermakova, G

    A. Ermakova, G. Pramanik, J.-M. Cai, G. Algara-Siller, U. Kaiser, T. Weil, Y.-K. Tzeng, H. C. Chang, L. P. McGuinness, M. B. Plenio, B. Naydenov, F. Jelezko, Nano Lett. 2013, 13,

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Detection of atomic spin labels in a lipid bilayer using a single-spin nanodiamond probe,

    “Detection of atomic spin labels in a lipid bilayer using a single-spin nanodiamond probe,” DOI 10.1073/pnas.1300640110can be found under https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1300640110, n.d

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1300640110can

  10. [10]

    Fujisaku, R

    T. Fujisaku, R. Tanabe, S. Onoda, R. Kubota, T. F. Segawa, F. T.-K. So, T. Ohshima, I. Hamachi, M. Shirakawa, R. Igarashi, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 11726

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Rendler, J

    T. Rendler, J. Neburkova, O. Zemek, J. Kotek, A. Zappe, Z. Chu, P. Cigler, J. Wrachtrup, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14701. 14

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2023, 5,

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Zhang, G

    T. Zhang, G. Pramanik, K. Zhang, M. Gulka, L. Wang, J. Jing, F. Xu, Z. Li, Q. Wei, P. Cigler, Z. Chu, ACS Sens. 2021, 6,

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Y. Wu, T. Weil, Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200059

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Dolde, H

    F. Dolde, H. Fedder, M. W. Doherty, T. Nöbauer, F. Rempp, G. Balasubramanian, T. Wolf, F. Reinhard, L. C. L. Hollenberg, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, Nat. Phys. 2011, 7,

    work page 2011

  16. [17]

    K. Bian, W. Zheng, X. Zeng, X. Chen, R. Stöhr, A. Denisenko, S. Yang, J. Wrachtrup, Y. Jiang, Nat. Commun. 2021, 12,

    work page 2021

  17. [18]

    Karaveli, O

    S. Karaveli, O. Gaathon, A. Wolcott, R. Sakakibara, O. A. Shemesh, D. S. Peterka, E. S. Boyden, J. S. Owen, R. Yuste, D. Englund, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016, 113,

    work page 2016

  18. [19]

    D. J. McCloskey, N. Dontschuk, A. Stacey, C. Pattinson, A. Nadarajah, L. T. Hall, L. C. L. Hollenberg, S. Prawer, D. A. Simpson, Nat. Photonics 2022, 16,

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Grotz, M

    B. Grotz, M. V. Hauf, M. Dankerl, B. Naydenov, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, M. Stutzmann, F. Reinhard, J. A. Garrido, Nat. Commun. 2012, 3,

    work page 2012

  20. [21]

    Härtl, J

    A. Härtl, J. A. Garrido, S. Nowy, R. Zimmermann, C. Werner, D. Horinek, R. Netz, M. Stutzmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,

    work page 2007

  21. [22]

    Schreyvogel, V

    C. Schreyvogel, V. Polyakov, R. Wunderlich, J. Meijer, C. E. Nebel, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12160

    work page 2015

  22. [23]

    Takeuchi, S.-G

    D. Takeuchi, S.-G. Ri, H. Kato, C. E. Nebel, S. Yamasaki, Phys. Status Solidi A 2005, 202,

    work page 2005

  23. [24]

    J. A. Garrido, S. Nowy, A. Härtl, M. Stutzmann, Langmuir 2008, 24,

    work page 2008

  24. [25]

    C. E. Nebel, B. Rezek, D. Shin, H. Watanabe, Phys. Status Solidi A 2006, 203,

    work page 2006

  25. [26]

    Petrakova, V

    V. Petrakova, V. Benson, M. Buncek, A. Fiserova, M. Ledvina, J. Stursa, P. Cigler, M. Nesladek, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12002

    work page 2016

  26. [27]

    M. Sow, H. Steuer, S. Adekanye, L. Ginés, S. Mandal, B. Gilboa, O. A. Williams, J. M. Smith, A. N. Kapanidis, Nanoscale 2020, 12, 21821

    work page 2020

  27. [28]

    Menon, A

    S. Menon, A. Tyler, M. Mather, Acad. Quantum 2025,

    work page 2025

  28. [29]

    Styles, M

    R. Styles, M. Han, T. Goris, J. Partridge, B. Johnson, B. del Rosal, A. Abraham, H. Ebendorff-Heidepriem, B. Gibson, N. Dontschuk, J.-P. Tetienne, P. Reineck, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, DOI 10.1002/adfm.202512068

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202512068 2025

  29. [30]

    D. J. McCloskey, D. Roberts, L. V. H. Rodgers, Y. Barsukov, I. D. Kaganovich, D. A. Simpson, N. P. de Leon, A. Stacey, N. Dontschuk, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 11, 2400242

    work page 2024

  30. [31]

    K. Chea, E. S. Grant, K. J. Rietwyk, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, D. A. Broadway, J.-P. Tetienne, G. Bryant, P. Reineck, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2026, e00957

    work page 2026

  31. [32]

    O. A. Williams, J. Hees, C. Dieker, W. Jäger, L. Kirste, C. E. Nebel, ACS Nano 2010, 4,

    work page 2010

  32. [33]

    L. V. H. Rodgers, S. T. Nguyen, J. H. Cox, K. Zervas, Z. Yuan, S. Sangtawesin, A. Stacey, C. Jaye, C. Weiland, A. Pershin, A. Gali, L. Thomsen, S. A. Meynell, L. B. Hughes, A. C. B. Jayich, X. Gui, R. J. Cava, R. R. Knowles, N. P. de Leon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2024, 121, e2316032121

    work page 2024

  33. [34]

    Rondin, G

    L. Rondin, G. Dantelle, A. Slablab, F. Grosshans, F. Treussart, P. Bergonzo, S. Perruchas, T. Gacoin, M. Chaigneau, H.-C. Chang, V. Jacques, J.-F. Roch, Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 115449

    work page 2010

  34. [35]

    T. W. Shanley, A. A. Martin, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 063103

    work page 2014

  35. [36]

    Mayerhoefer, A

    E. Mayerhoefer, A. Krueger, Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55,

    work page 2022

  36. [37]

    Treussart, V

    F. Treussart, V. Jacques, E. Wu, T. Gacoin, P. Grangier, J.-F. Roch, Phys. B Condens. Matter 2006, 376–377,

    work page 2006

  37. [38]

    O. Chum, T. Pajdla, P. Sturm, Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2005, 97,

    work page 2005

  38. [39]

    Petráková, A

    V. Petráková, A. Taylor, I. Kratochvílová, F. Fendrych, J. Vacík, J. Kučka, J. Štursa, P. Cígler, M. Ledvina, A. Fišerová, P. Kneppo, M. Nesládek, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22,

    work page 2012

  39. [40]

    Janotta, M

    B. Janotta, M. Schalenbach, H. Tempel, R.-A. Eichel, Electrochimica Acta 2024, 508, 145280

    work page 2024

  40. [41]

    Schalenbach, B

    M. Schalenbach, B. Hecker, B. Schmid, Y. E. Durmus, H. Tempel, H. Kungl, R.-A. Eichel, Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2023, 3, e2100189

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    Marecka-Migacz, P

    A. Marecka-Migacz, P. T. Mitkowski, A. Nędzarek, J. Różański, W. Szaferski, Membranes 2020, 10, DOI 10.3390/membranes10090235

    work page doi:10.3390/membranes10090235 2020

  42. [43]

    Y. A. Le Gouellec, M. Elimelech, Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19,

    work page 2002