Is the overconcentration of pristine populations in Galactic globular clusters real? An N-body approach to the problem

A. Askar; F. Flammini Dotti; M. Giersz; M. Ishchenko; M. Sobolenko; O. Sobodar; P. Berczik; R. Spurzem

arxiv: 2602.15953 · v2 · pith:KGN2KOFPnew · submitted 2026-02-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Is the overconcentration of pristine populations in Galactic globular clusters real? An N-body approach to the problem

P. Berczik , O. Sobodar , F. Flammini Dotti , M. Sobolenko , M. Ishchenko , R. Spurzem , M. Giersz , A. Askar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords globular clustersmultiple stellar populationsN-body simulationsblack hole subsystemstellar dynamicsred giant branch starsMilky Way

0 comments

The pith

Direct N-body simulations confirm that apparent overconcentration of pristine RGB stars in globular clusters is a transient effect from black hole subsystem interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the observed central concentration of pristine first-population red giant branch stars over enriched second-population stars in some Milky Way globular clusters reflects true initial conditions. It uses tailored direct N-body simulations with NBODY6++GPU to reproduce clusters that have lost much of their mass and host an active black hole subsystem. Results show stochastic fluctuations and preferential ejection of 2P RGB stars and progenitors from the center create a temporary illusion of 1P overconcentration when RGB stars are used as tracers. This matches earlier Monte Carlo work and removes the contradiction with multiple-population formation models that expect the opposite initial setup. A sympathetic reader cares because the finding preserves standard formation scenarios while explaining the data through dynamics alone.

Core claim

The simulations confirm that the spatial distributions and kinematics inferred from RGB stars can be strongly affected by stochastic fluctuations and interactions with the BHS. Preferential ejection of 2P RGB and their progenitors from the cluster center leads to a transient apparent overconcentration of 1P RGB stars, in agreement with earlier MOCCA predictions.

What carries the argument

The black hole subsystem (BHS) driving preferential ejection of second-population RGB stars and progenitors through dynamical interactions in mass-lost clusters.

If this is right

The apparent overconcentration is transient and appears only after clusters have lost a large fraction of their initial mass.
RGB stars serve as particularly sensitive tracers that reveal the effect while other populations may not.
The phenomenon originates in ongoing dynamical interactions with the BHS rather than in the initial formation of the populations.
Direct N-body integration independently reproduces the same transient signature previously found with Monte Carlo methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same ejection process could subtly alter kinematic signatures or velocity dispersions measured from RGB samples in affected clusters.
Comparing multiple tracer types within one cluster offers a direct observational test for the presence of this transient phase.
Varying the assumed BHS mass or activity level in follow-up simulations could map how long the apparent overconcentration persists.

Load-bearing premise

The initial conditions accurately capture the dynamical state of real globular clusters that have lost a large fraction of their mass while retaining an active black hole subsystem.

What would settle it

Mapping the spatial distribution of main-sequence stars rather than RGB stars in the same clusters would show no overconcentration of the pristine population if the BHS ejection mechanism is operating.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15953 by A. Askar, F. Flammini Dotti, M. Giersz, M. Ishchenko, M. Sobolenko, O. Sobodar, P. Berczik, R. Spurzem.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Cumulative number distributions of RGB stars for 1P (green) and 2P (blue) around 1.2 Gyr as a function of projected distance, normalised by the 2D half-light radius Rhl. Solid line: N-body model (average of 33 snapshots). Dashed line: MOCCA model (average of 5 snapshots). Snapshots span 1.18–1.22 Gyr. a wide range of cluster environments (e.g. Giersz et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2016; Madrid et al. 2017; Gelle… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The time evolution of the A+ parameter for different type of stars and for X −Y projection of 3D snapshots. The left panel shows RGB stars, the middle panel – evolved luminous stars and the right panel – MS stars. The red, green and blue lines are averaged over 9, 17 and 33 snapshots, respectively. 3. Results Following the approach presented in (Leitinger et al. 2023), we used the A+ parameter (Alessandrin… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent observations indicate that in some Milky Way globular clusters (GCs) pristine red giant branch (RGB) stars appear more centrally concentrated than enriched ones. This contradicts most multiple stellar population (MSP) formation scenarios, which predict that the enriched (second) population (2P) should initially be more concentrated than the pristine (first) population (1P). Previous MOCCA Monte Carlo simulations suggested that this apparent overconcentration is a transient effect arising in clusters that have lost a large fraction of their initial mass and host an active black hole subsystem (BHS), and is visible only when RGB stars are used as tracers. In this letter, we test this interpretation using tailored NBODY6++GPU models evolved with direct N-body simulations, providing an independent validation that does not rely on a statistical treatment of relaxation. We performed direct N-body simulations with the NBODY6++GPU code, adopting initial conditions designed to reproduce the dynamical regime relevant to the proposed mechanism. The simulations include updated stellar and binary evolution, dynamical interactions, and the Galactic tidal field, enabling a direct comparison with MOCCA results. The simulations confirm that the spatial distributions and kinematics inferred from RGB stars can be strongly affected by stochastic fluctuations and interactions with the BHS. Preferential ejection of 2P RGB and their progenitors from the cluster center leads to a transient apparent overconcentration of 1P RGB stars, in agreement with earlier MOCCA predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

N-body runs back the MOCCA picture for apparent 1P overconcentration but start from pre-tuned initial conditions.

read the letter

The main point is that these direct NBODY6++GPU runs reproduce the transient overconcentration of 1P RGB stars via preferential 2P ejection by the black hole subsystem, giving an independent check on the earlier MOCCA Monte Carlo results without using statistical relaxation approximations. The simulations include updated stellar/binary evolution and the Galactic tidal field, which strengthens the comparison to real clusters in that dynamical state. That cross-method confirmation is the useful part here and adds some weight to the idea that observed spatial distributions can be shaped by later dynamical processing rather than initial conditions alone. The setup chooses initial conditions to match clusters that have already lost a large fraction of mass and host an active BHS, so the mechanism operates by design but does not emerge from more generic starting points. This makes the result a consistency test inside the targeted regime rather than a broader demonstration that the effect explains the observations across the population. The abstract also stays light on numbers—no count of realizations, no size of the effect, and no direct comparison plots—so it is hard to judge how robust or frequent the signal is. This paper is mainly for people working on multiple-population dynamics and chemical tagging in Milky Way globular clusters. A reader who needs to know whether RGB stars are reliable tracers would get a clear cautionary note from the N-body confirmation. I would send it for peer review; the independent numerical test is worth referee time even if more quantitative detail is needed in revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses direct N-body simulations performed with NBODY6++GPU to test whether the observed central overconcentration of pristine (1P) RGB stars relative to enriched (2P) stars in some Galactic globular clusters can arise as a transient dynamical effect. The authors adopt initial conditions chosen to place clusters in a high mass-loss regime hosting an active black hole subsystem (BHS), evolve the models with updated stellar/binary evolution, dynamical interactions, and the Galactic tidal field, and report that preferential ejection of 2P RGB stars and progenitors produces an apparent 1P overconcentration when RGB tracers are used, in agreement with prior MOCCA Monte Carlo predictions.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies an independent direct-integration validation of a mechanism that can reconcile observations with multiple-population formation scenarios. It underscores the sensitivity of RGB-based spatial and kinematic inferences to stochastic fluctuations and BHS interactions in dynamically evolved clusters, and demonstrates that the effect is visible only for specific tracers and evolutionary stages.

major comments (1)

[simulation setup] Simulation setup (abstract and paragraph describing initial conditions): the models are initialized with conditions explicitly chosen to reproduce clusters that have already lost a large fraction of their initial mass and host an active BHS. This pre-selection permits the mechanism to operate but leaves open whether the required mass-loss fraction and BHS density arise self-consistently from more generic starting points; the central claim that the N-body runs provide a robust validation of the transient overconcentration therefore rests on an assumption whose generality is not demonstrated within the manuscript.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that the simulations reproduce the reported effect but provides no quantitative measures (e.g., concentration ratios, radial-profile differences, or statistical significance) or the number of independent realizations performed; inclusion of these metrics and direct comparison plots against the MOCCA results would strengthen the presentation.
Notation for the two populations (1P/2P) and for the black-hole subsystem (BHS) is introduced without an explicit definition table or first-use footnote; a brief glossary or consistent parenthetical expansion on first appearance would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the significance of our direct N-body validation. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [simulation setup] Simulation setup (abstract and paragraph describing initial conditions): the models are initialized with conditions explicitly chosen to reproduce clusters that have already lost a large fraction of their initial mass and host an active BHS. This pre-selection permits the mechanism to operate but leaves open whether the required mass-loss fraction and BHS density arise self-consistently from more generic starting points; the central claim that the N-body runs provide a robust validation of the transient overconcentration therefore rests on an assumption whose generality is not demonstrated within the manuscript.

Authors: We agree that the initial conditions were deliberately chosen to place the clusters in the high mass-loss regime with an active black hole subsystem. This targeted setup follows directly from the MOCCA results that identified the mechanism as operating under precisely these conditions. The letter's purpose is to supply an independent direct-integration test of the dynamical effect itself (preferential ejection of 2P RGB stars and progenitors by the BHS) rather than to evolve clusters self-consistently from generic birth conditions. We acknowledge that the present work does not demonstrate how the required mass-loss fraction and BHS density emerge from arbitrary starting points; such a demonstration would require a substantially larger parameter survey outside the scope of this short letter. In the revised version we will explicitly state the targeted nature of the initial conditions in both the abstract and the methods section and will add a brief discussion of the conditions under which the relevant regime is expected to arise in realistic cluster evolution. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Independent N-body runs provide self-contained validation

full rationale

The paper generates its central result through new direct N-body integrations with NBODY6++GPU that evolve tailored initial conditions forward in time; the reported transient 1P RGB overconcentration and preferential 2P ejection emerge from the simulated dynamics, stellar evolution, and BHS interactions rather than from any redefinition or statistical fit of the input quantities. Reference to prior MOCCA work supplies only the motivating interpretation being tested, not a load-bearing premise that the present derivation reduces to. Because the numerical outcome is produced by an independent integration method and is not presupposed by construction, the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the chosen initial conditions isolate the black-hole-driven ejection mechanism; details of those conditions are not provided in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

Initial mass-loss fraction
Selected to place the model cluster in the regime where the transient effect is expected.
Black-hole subsystem density
Tuned to ensure an active BHS is present during the RGB phase.

axioms (2)

domain assumption RGB stars are faithful tracers of the spatial distribution of their birth populations at the epochs examined
The paper states the effect is visible only when RGB stars are used as tracers.
standard math NBODY6++GPU accurately implements stellar evolution, binary interactions, and the external tidal field
The simulation results depend on the fidelity of these modules.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5828 in / 1467 out tokens · 77738 ms · 2026-05-21T12:04:08.589972+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We performed direct N-body simulations with the NBODY6++GPU code, adopting initial conditions designed to reproduce the dynamical regime relevant to the proposed mechanism... The selected N-body model dissolves on a much shorter timescale... but it captures the essential physical processes.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

R., Miocchi, P., & Vesperini, E

Alessandrini, E., Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., Miocchi, P., & Vesperini, E. 2016, ApJ, 833, 252

work page 2016
[2]

& Lardo, C

Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83

work page 2018
[3]

2024, A&A, 685, A158

Cadelano, M., Dalessandro, E., & Vesperini, E. 2024, A&A, 685, A158

work page 2024
[4]

P., et al

Cordoni, G., Casagrande, L., Milone, A. P., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2342

work page 2025
[5]

2024, A&A, 691, A94

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Della Croce, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A94

work page 2024
[6]

2019, ApJ, 884, L24

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, L24

work page 2019
[7]

2018, ApJ, 859, 15

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 15

work page 2018
[8]

M., Cheung, P., Portegies Zwart, S

Fregeau, J. M., Cheung, P., Portegies Zwart, S. F., & Rasio, F. A. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1

work page 2004
[9]

Fregeau, J. M. & Rasio, F. A. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1047

work page 2007
[10]

M., Leigh, N

Geller, A. M., Leigh, N. W. C., Giersz, M., Kremer, K., & Rasio, F. A. 2019, ApJ, 872, 165

work page 2019
[11]

1998, MNRAS, 298, 1239

Giersz, M. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 1239

work page 1998
[12]

C., & Hurley, J

Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., & Hurley, J. R. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 429

work page 2008
[13]

C., Hurley, J

Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., Hurley, J. R., & Hypki, A. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2184

work page 2013
[14]

2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8 Hénon, M

Gratton, R., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., et al. 2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8 Hénon, M. H. 1971, Ap&SS, 14, 151

work page 2019
[15]

2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 11

Huang, S.-Y ., Spurzem, R., & Berczik, P. 2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 11

work page 2016
[16]

& Giersz, M

Hypki, A. & Giersz, M. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1221

work page 2013
[17]

2022, MNRAS, 517, 4768

Hypki, A., Giersz, M., Hong, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4768

work page 2022
[18]

2025, A&A, 693, A41

Hypki, A., Vesperini, E., Giersz, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A41

work page 2025
[19]

2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Küpper, A

Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Küpper, A. H. W., Maschberger, T., Kroupa, P., & Baumgardt, H. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2300

work page 2001
[20]

& Stiefel, E

Kustaanheimo, P. & Stiefel, E. 1965, Journal fur die reine und angewandte Math- ematik

work page 1965
[21]

2023, MNRAS, 520, 1456

Leitinger, E., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., Hilker, M., & Pancino, E. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1456

work page 2023
[22]

I., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., et al

Leitinger, E. I., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A184

work page 2025
[23]

2022, MNRAS, 514, 5739

Leveque, A., Giersz, M., Banerjee, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5739

work page 2022
[24]

& Spurzem, R

Li, Z.-M. & Spurzem, R. 2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 015009

work page 2026
[25]

2023, ApJ, 944, 58

Libralato, M., Vesperini, E., Bellini, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 58

work page 2023
[26]

P., Leigh, N

Madrid, J. P., Leigh, N. W. C., Hurley, J. R., & Giersz, M. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 1729

work page 2017
[27]

J., Milone, A

Mehta, V . J., Milone, A. P., Casagrande, L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 1077

work page 2025
[28]

Milone, A. P. & Marino, A. F. 2022, Universe, 8, 359

work page 2022
[29]

& Aarseth, S

Nitadori, K. & Aarseth, S. J. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 545 Pavlík, V ., Davies, M. B., Leitinger, E. I., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A157

work page 2012
[30]

P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al

Rizzuto, F. P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5257

work page 2021
[31]

& Kamlah, A

Spurzem, R. & Kamlah, A. 2023, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics, 9, 3 Stodółkiewicz, J. S. 1982, Acta Astron., 32, 63

work page 2023
[32]

C., Askar, A., Kamlah, A

Vergara, M. C., Askar, A., Kamlah, A. W. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.07491

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

2016, MNRAS, 458, 1450

Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 1450

work page 2016
[34]

Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4070 Article number, page 4 Berczik et al.: Pristine population overconcentration in globular clusters Appendix A: Projection properties of cluster RGB stars Figure A.1 shows the time evolution of the RGB-star counts in the 1P and 2P populations for projections of the 3D data onto the Galactic c...

work page 2015

[1] [1]

R., Miocchi, P., & Vesperini, E

Alessandrini, E., Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., Miocchi, P., & Vesperini, E. 2016, ApJ, 833, 252

work page 2016

[2] [2]

& Lardo, C

Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83

work page 2018

[3] [3]

2024, A&A, 685, A158

Cadelano, M., Dalessandro, E., & Vesperini, E. 2024, A&A, 685, A158

work page 2024

[4] [4]

P., et al

Cordoni, G., Casagrande, L., Milone, A. P., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2342

work page 2025

[5] [5]

2024, A&A, 691, A94

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Della Croce, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A94

work page 2024

[6] [6]

2019, ApJ, 884, L24

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, L24

work page 2019

[7] [7]

2018, ApJ, 859, 15

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 15

work page 2018

[8] [8]

M., Cheung, P., Portegies Zwart, S

Fregeau, J. M., Cheung, P., Portegies Zwart, S. F., & Rasio, F. A. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1

work page 2004

[9] [9]

Fregeau, J. M. & Rasio, F. A. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1047

work page 2007

[10] [10]

M., Leigh, N

Geller, A. M., Leigh, N. W. C., Giersz, M., Kremer, K., & Rasio, F. A. 2019, ApJ, 872, 165

work page 2019

[11] [11]

1998, MNRAS, 298, 1239

Giersz, M. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 1239

work page 1998

[12] [12]

C., & Hurley, J

Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., & Hurley, J. R. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 429

work page 2008

[13] [13]

C., Hurley, J

Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., Hurley, J. R., & Hypki, A. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2184

work page 2013

[14] [14]

2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8 Hénon, M

Gratton, R., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., et al. 2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8 Hénon, M. H. 1971, Ap&SS, 14, 151

work page 2019

[15] [15]

2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 11

Huang, S.-Y ., Spurzem, R., & Berczik, P. 2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 11

work page 2016

[16] [16]

& Giersz, M

Hypki, A. & Giersz, M. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1221

work page 2013

[17] [17]

2022, MNRAS, 517, 4768

Hypki, A., Giersz, M., Hong, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4768

work page 2022

[18] [18]

2025, A&A, 693, A41

Hypki, A., Vesperini, E., Giersz, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A41

work page 2025

[19] [19]

2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Küpper, A

Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Küpper, A. H. W., Maschberger, T., Kroupa, P., & Baumgardt, H. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2300

work page 2001

[20] [20]

& Stiefel, E

Kustaanheimo, P. & Stiefel, E. 1965, Journal fur die reine und angewandte Math- ematik

work page 1965

[21] [21]

2023, MNRAS, 520, 1456

Leitinger, E., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., Hilker, M., & Pancino, E. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1456

work page 2023

[22] [22]

I., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., et al

Leitinger, E. I., Baumgardt, H., Cabrera-Ziri, I., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A184

work page 2025

[23] [23]

2022, MNRAS, 514, 5739

Leveque, A., Giersz, M., Banerjee, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5739

work page 2022

[24] [24]

& Spurzem, R

Li, Z.-M. & Spurzem, R. 2026, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26, 015009

work page 2026

[25] [25]

2023, ApJ, 944, 58

Libralato, M., Vesperini, E., Bellini, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 58

work page 2023

[26] [26]

P., Leigh, N

Madrid, J. P., Leigh, N. W. C., Hurley, J. R., & Giersz, M. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 1729

work page 2017

[27] [27]

J., Milone, A

Mehta, V . J., Milone, A. P., Casagrande, L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 1077

work page 2025

[28] [28]

Milone, A. P. & Marino, A. F. 2022, Universe, 8, 359

work page 2022

[29] [29]

& Aarseth, S

Nitadori, K. & Aarseth, S. J. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 545 Pavlík, V ., Davies, M. B., Leitinger, E. I., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A157

work page 2012

[30] [30]

P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al

Rizzuto, F. P., Naab, T., Spurzem, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5257

work page 2021

[31] [31]

& Kamlah, A

Spurzem, R. & Kamlah, A. 2023, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics, 9, 3 Stodółkiewicz, J. S. 1982, Acta Astron., 32, 63

work page 2023

[32] [32]

C., Askar, A., Kamlah, A

Vergara, M. C., Askar, A., Kamlah, A. W. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.07491

work page arXiv 2025

[33] [33]

2016, MNRAS, 458, 1450

Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 1450

work page 2016

[34] [34]

Wang, L., Spurzem, R., Aarseth, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4070 Article number, page 4 Berczik et al.: Pristine population overconcentration in globular clusters Appendix A: Projection properties of cluster RGB stars Figure A.1 shows the time evolution of the RGB-star counts in the 1P and 2P populations for projections of the 3D data onto the Galactic c...

work page 2015